TeamStatus
T 1 Complete or Escalate
T 2 Pick Up
T 2 Resolve Case
T 1 Pick Up
T 1 Complete or Escalate
T 1 Pick Up
T 1 Complete or Escalate
I want to get he group based of Resolve Case value in Status Column. Anything before Resolve case will be considered as Group 1 and after Resolve Case status should be considered as Group 2. Below is desired new Group column,
Group TeamStatus
Group 1 T 1Complete or Escalate
T 2 Pick Up
T 2 Resolve Case
Group 2 T 1Pick Up
T 1Complete or Escalate
T 1 Pick Up
T 1 Complete or Escalate
> SELECT tranno ,mrno medrecno ,createdon,createdat,no_of_trans nooftrans FROM mytab WHERE mrno = 'MR1514' and tranno = 1111 ORDER BY no_of_trans tranno medrecno createdon createdat nooftrans
I am trying to calculate the the running total but also tried to reset to reset to zero based on a value of a column.
here I am trying to calculate the value of CalcVal column based on column Flag value...actually it is running total but it reset to zero if Flag value is 0.
Here is the example of data along with required column
Table: classes Columns: classID, hp Table: char_active Columns: name, classID, hp
The classes table is already populated.
What I want to do is insert a new row into char_active using the name and classID column, and have the HP column auto populate based on the corresponding value in the classes table. This is the trigger I wrote but I'm getting the error
Incorrect syntax near 'inserted'.
I'm new to sql, this is actually the first trigger I've tried writing.
create trigger new_hp on curr_chars.char_active instead of insert as declare @hp tinyint select @hp=lists.classes.hp from lists.classes where lists.classes.classID=inserted.classID insert into curr_chars.char_active (name, classID, hp) inserted.name, inserted.classID, @hp go
I have a scenario to compare previous records based on each ID columns. For each ID, there would be few records, I have a column called "compare", We have to compare all Compare 1 records with Compare 0 Records. If Dt is lesser or equal to comparing DT, then show 0. Else 1
We always only one Compare 0 records in my table, so all compare 1 columns will compare with only one row per ID
My tables look like
Declare @tab1 table (ID Varchar(3), Dt Date, Compare Int) Insert Into @tab1 values ('101','2015-07-01',0) Insert Into @tab1 values ('101','2015-07-02',1) Insert Into @tab1 values ('101','2015-07-03',1) Insert Into @tab1 values ('101','2015-07-01',1) Insert Into @tab1 values ('101','2015-06-30',1)
Insert Into @tab1 values ('102','2015-07-01',0) Insert Into @tab1 values ('102','2015-07-02',1) Insert Into @tab1 values ('102','2015-07-01',1)
select * from @tab1
1.) In the above scenario for ID = '101', we have 5 records, first record has Compare value 0, which mean all other 4 records need to compare with this record only
2.) If Compare 1 record's Dt is less or equal to Compare 0's DT, then show 0 in next column
3.) If Compare 1 record's Dt is greater than Compare 0's DT, then show 1 in next column
I have 3 columns. I would like to update a table based on job_cd and permit_nbr column. if we have same job_cd and permit_nbr, reference number should be same else it should take max(reference number) from the table +1 for all rows where reference_nbr column is null
I have a query running and returning 3 columns, user name, e-mail and device name
SELECT DISTINCT v_R_User.Full_User_Name0 AS 'User full Name', v_R_User.Mail0 AS 'E-Mail', _RES_COLL_DEV00144.Name FROM v_R_System INNER JOIN v_R_User ON v_R_System.User_Name0 = v_R_User.User_Name0 INNER JOIN _RES_COLL_DEV00144 ON v_R_User.User_Name0 = _RES_COLL_DEV00144.UserName INNER JOIN v_GS_COMPUTER_SYSTEM ON v_R_System.ResourceID = v_GS_COMPUTER_SYSTEM.ResourceID Where v_R_User.Mail0 <> '' ORDER BY 'User Full Name'
From here I would like to generate an e-mail to each user (like mail merge) to each user in the table an include their machine name. I can do it with PS, but rather have it run directly from SQL. Is it possible?
I have a requirement where i want to delete the records based on the Date column. I have table which contain the columns like machinename ,lasthardwarescandate
I want to delete the records based on the max(Lasthardwarescandate) i.e. latest one, column where the machine name is duplicate menace it repeats. So how would i remove the duplicate machine names based on the Lasthardwarescandate column(There are multiple entries for the Lasthardwarescandate so i want to fetch the latest date column).
Note: Duplication should be removed based on “Last Hardware Scan” date.
Only latest date should be considered from multiple records for the same system. "
I have 3 different companies that share the same ticket_types(CRMS System). I need to display the Ticket Types and the 3 company's Ticket Count:
Ticket Type | Company A Count | Company B Count | Company C Count
I can get the information individually for each company, but if a company doesn't have a ticket in one of the ticket_types, then it isn't displayed in a row. So, I tried to write the following, which isn't pulling back any data.
DECLARE @startdate date = '20150306' DECLARE @enddate date = '20151031' DECLARE @AcctGrp varchar(20) = '111' ;WITH TType AS ( SELECT ctp.description as TicketType
[Code] .....
If I run each SELECT individually from above (excluding the last SELECT), it works and I get the following:
TicketType AR Request Credit Availability/Rush Cancel Order Credit Card Payment Expedite Order Freight Quote
[Code] ...
How to get the query results? Am I even close to getting it right?
ClaimNumTransactionDateUsername ClaimNum TransactionAmountUserName 2000074 20150209jerry.witt 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL 2000074 20150626DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL
[Code] .....
So,if we look at the result set, we notice 2 conditions where the IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.Username is like 'Data' and if we see the transaction date then sometimes that is the max transaction date or sometimes there are transactions that happened after but that doesn't have like '%data%' in username . So, i need to add a new column to my sql query which should basically verify if the username is like '%data%' and if that is the max(transaction date) or even if there are any transactions after that doesn't have like '%data%' then YES else No.
I have a table that is used to build rules. The rules point to other columns in other tables and usually contain only one value (i.e. ABC). But one of the options is to add a comma-separated list of SSNs (i.e. 123123123,012012012,112231122). I am trying to build a single query that allows me to leverage that list to get multiple rows from another table.
This obviously works:
SELECT * FROM vw_Person_Profile P (NOLOCK) WHERE P.PrsnPIISSN_Chr IN ('123123123','012012012','112231122')
But this does not:
SELECT * FROM vw_Person_Profile P (NOLOCK) WHERE P.PrsnPIISSN_Chr IN ( SELECT '''' + REPLACE(CONVERT(VARCHAR(4000),txtFieldValue), ',', ''',''') + '''' FROM MassProcessing_Rules PR WHERE PR.intRuleID = 10 )
In SQL Server 2005, I want to do a set query on the following data that results in 3 groups:
Id EventName EventTime
1 First 41:40.2
2 First 41:41.6
3 First 41:43.1
4 First 41:44.4
5 Second 41:46.4
6 Second 41:48.3
7 Second 41:49.7
8 First 41:51.2
9 First 41:53.3
10 First 41:55.0
So, I want to have a query that returns one aggregate row for each of rows 1-4, 5-7 and 8-10 based on the EventName. Every time EventName 'changes' in the order that I sort it, I want to start a new grouping:
Group EventName Count
1 First 4
2 Second 3
3 First 3
With this query, I could also get the Min() and Max() EventTime for each group, etc.
However, this is proving difficult to do in set SQL. Obviously, if I group on EventName, then rows 1-4 *and* 8-10 will be rolled into my 'First' group. However, there is no other partitioning information that I can factor in that splits this data into *only* 3 groups, based on the order of the Event Time.
I have tried the various ranking functions, but the problem persists through any combination of function, PARTITION BY and ORDER BY that I can find.
Technology Type Size XYZ A 200 XYZ1 A 200 XYZ2 A 300 XYZ3 A 300 ABC1 X 238 ABC2 X 238 PQR B 320 MNO C 330
I have written a query on a table whose output will look like the above. I need to know if i should store this in a record set or create a temp table to get the following fuctionality.
Now I need to concatenate the Technology based on Type and size.
As you can see in Type A we have two sizes 200 and 300.
We need to group the Technology of type A with same size together.
So the output of the procedure should be
XYZ + XYZ1 XYZ2+ XYZ3 ABC1 + ABC2 etc.
We need to concatenate the Technology string with the next technology if they have the same type and size.
I want to group by a fields value in a table. I have a purchase table where contracts and orders are stored in together. Now what I need is, I have to group only by the rows that contain an identical contract_no and order_no as those records represent the actual contract. the other rows contain order data-sets which need to be subtracted from the contracts values.
I'm having some difficulty getting the appropriate results for my scenerio. I have two different datasets that I'm using. One is consisting of two joined tables and the other consisting of one sp. The sp's parameters rely on two things- one is the companyNum (inputed when the user runs the report) and two is the ContactNumType. The ContactTypeNum comes from the dataset of tables. I need to have a table consisting of this format:
ContactNumType1 (From the Tables) File_Name1 (From the sp) File_Name4 (From the sp) File_Name3 (From the sp)
ContactNumType2 (From the Tables) File_Name2 (From the sp) File_Name7(From the sp)
ContactNumType3 (From the Tables) File_Name5 (From the sp)
ContactNumType4 (From the Tables) File_Name6 (From the sp)
File_Name10 (From the sp) File_Name8(From the sp) File_Name9 (From the sp)
So essentially what is going on is that every returned File_Name is grouped based upon the type of ContactNumType. My table returns the appropriate ContactNumTypes and the appropriate number of File_Names but returns only the first File_Name for each row. The File_Names should only grouped by the ContactTypeNums and each be unique. Is there any way to do that?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Edited: I still am trying to work this out. I've tried a few run-arounds but none have worked. Adding custom code apparently is too risky at this point because of the security precautions that I've been instructed to take. Any help would be greatly appreciated as this project has been going on for days now....
To give you some context we have a new amendments application (nothing fancy, excel based with SQL Server back end) that allows users to submit amendments to product data (Product Info, PO Prices, Dates etc.). There is also an admin tool that a team uses to action these amendments in the various systems.
The old version of this tool, users submitted amendments by style and could if need be submit multiple amendments against one product at the same time. The new tool, I believe for audit reasons, users submit by amendment type, so for example I would submit a cost price change for a given style.
The issue now is that on the occasions where a user has multiple amendments, they now come through separately. So cost price would be Amendment 1 and a date change would be amendment 2 even though they could be the same product. This could potentially mean that the admin team would be duplicating work if the paperwork is updated and sent after each amendment, whereas before they would make both changes and only send the paperwork once.
Having not built either of these tools, I've been tasked with trying to fix this, my two thoughts being either to amend the user form to somehow capture/ allow users to submit amendments together or try to use the existing data and doing the grouping dynamically in the back end. Use that lag to look at grouping any submitted amendments that occur within 30mins of the first occurrence of that style
This grouping would then be given a joint time so when the 'time lag' period passes the amendments will be visible together.I've tried a few things and a few head on desk moments trying to get a set based approach but haven't been able to get where i want, its either an issue where amendments span an hour, such as 9:59 and then 10:03 or grouping together amendments that happen after the 30mins of the first one.
Here is some sample data
USE FF_Winning_Together; IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..#AmendTest',N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #AmendTest; CREATE TABLE #AmendTest ( AmendmentIDINT IDENTITY(1,1)NOT NULL, StyleCHAR(1)NOT NULL, AmendmentStatusVARCHAR(10)NOT NULL, DTDATETIMENOT NULL
I am designing a dimension table which will include a short name column based on the (full) name column. For example say Product dimension where I will have ProductName and ProductShortName. ProductShortName will be the first 6 characters of ProductName. I could populate ProductShortName using:
Substring in the select when I select from the original system, e.g. SUBSTR(PRODUCT_NAME, 1, 6) AS ProductShortName
Create a derived column in the SSIS flow which does the same thing
Create the ProductShortName column as a computed column which uses substring on ProductName
Create a trigger that populates ProductShortName based on ProductName when a row is inserted or updated
Create a named calculation in the table in the Analysis Services project's data source view
Create a named query in the Analysis Services project's data source view
I usually use 1, and 5 or 6 would only be used if I only will create reports against the cubes. 3 seems easiest to maintain, so I am thinking about using that one, but maybe it is slow for the data flow as I imagine it must be something like using 4, or when is the column "created" at runtime, i.e. when the table is queried? Which approach(es) do or would you use? Pros and cons?
I was working on what I was told was SQL 2012 and it turns out it is SQL 2005. I wrote two procs that I need to convert to 2005. Here is the code:
SELECT era_provider_name AS Provider, RIGHT([era_upi], 5) AS 'ERA Upi', [era_fy] AS 'ERA FY', ProcGrp, COUNT(DISTINCT UCI) AS 'Client Count',
[Code]....
I'm not finding an efficient way to do this. I cannot use GROUPING SETS with 2005. Here is the code for the second proc:
SELECT CASE WHEN GROUPING(era_provider_name) = 1 THEN 'TOTALS' ELSE era_provider_name END AS era_provider_name, CASE WHEN GROUPING(era_fy) = 1 THEN 'TOTALFY'
[Code] ...
The results as in SQL 2012 are exactly as I would like them. I want to mimic those results in 2005.
This is a report I'm trying to build in SQL Reporting Services. I can do it in a hacky way adding two data sets and showing two tables, but I'm sure there is a better way.
TheTable Order# Customer Status
STATUS has valid values of PROCESSED and INPROGRESS
The query I'm trying to build is Count of Processed and INProgress orders for a given Customer.
I can get them one at a time with something like this in two different datasets and showing two tables, but how do I achieve the same in one query?
Select Customer, Count (*) As Status1 FROM TheTable Where (Status = N'Shipped') Group By Customer
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ADAMHsp_BSS_GetNonMedicaidReportTotals] @pstrProviderNameVARCHAR(100) AS BEGIN
[Code] ....
See my result set in the picture below. The rows with NULL in the 'ProcGrp' column have the totals of the groupings by FY that I am looking for - that's great. What I want to do now is have another row that contains the sums of the values from any row where 'ProcGrp' is null so that I have a totals row.
INSERT INTO @GroupRelation_Test ( CustomerNumber, AmountBilled,MinAmounttBilled) SELECT'12','15243','' UNION ALL SELECT'1231234','15243','' UNION ALL SELECT'463','15243','' UNION ALL SELECT'442','15243','' UNION ALL
I have a table with duration values for different machine states. I 'm trying have a sum of the duration value of each state ( the duration sum , was an earlier question).
