TransactionScope Limitations And MS DTC

Nov 15, 2007

I am receiving an error message while using the System.Transactions.TransactionScope class.  The error message that I am receiving is "Communication with the underlying transaction manager has failed".  This error seems to only appear when I have my web application one server, Server1,  and my database on a second, Server2.  When I run the web app on the same server as the database (i.e., web site and database on Server2), I don't receive this error.  So, this leads me to believe this has something to do with MS DTC. 
 Is there a limit to how much data MS DTC can manage for a given transaction?  If so, is it configurable?
 When I run my code, the application fails after a certain number of steps (this is repeatable). See sample code below.  When I execute the code below, the error occurs on UpdateBody2();.  If I comment out UpdateBody2(), the error will now occur on UpdateBody3();, and so on.  This leads me to believe that I have hit some upper limit.
 
My code follows a pattern similar to this:

using {TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope())
{
    UpdateHeader();
    UpdateBody1();
    UpdateBody2();
    UpdateBody3();
    UpdateFooter();
}

Where each of the classes follows a pattern of:
UpdateHeader()
{
    using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection())
    {
    conn.Open();
    // Do something 
    conn.Close();
    }

Environment:
ASP.NET 2.0
SQL/2005 Standard
Windows Server 2003  
Thanks.
Steve 

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

TransactionScope

Oct 20, 2007

 I am at a loss here.    Sub Main()        Dim sqlConnection As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("db").ToString)        Dim dbCommand As New SqlCommand("test", sqlConnection)        dbCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure        Using ts As New TransactionScope            Using sqlConnection                sqlConnection.Open()                Try                    dbCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()                    Console.WriteLine("Success")                Catch ex As SqlException                    Console.WriteLine(ex.Message)                Finally                    dbCommand.Dispose()                End Try                ts.Complete()            End Using        End Using        Console.ReadKey()    End Sub  BEGIN    Insert    dbo.Table_2        (Column1)        Values        (newid())    Insert    dbo.Table_1        (Column1)        Values        ('123456')End The Try block catches the exception in the second insert statement as it should, but I still get this exception "The COMMIT TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." at the last End Using. I have tried placing Begin Transaction/Commit Transaction around the insert statement, but I get the same exception. What I am doing seems to match all the examples for the TransactionScope class.

View 1 Replies View Related

Want To Use TransactionScope But Not Getting It.......................................

Feb 2, 2008

Transaction/TransactionScope
When a user signs up on our site we use Microsofts Membership and Roles Framework. We also have some of our own tables that need to be updated. I have tried to wrap the whole thing into TransactionScope but it is not working. Looking at some samples it might not be possible to do what I am trying to do. We have a Data Access Layer to get the data from or into the database. Here is some mock up code:
using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope transaction = new System.Transactions.TransactionScope()){MembershipUser newUser = Membership.CreateUser(userName, password, email, question, answer, isApproved, out status);Roles.AddUserToRole(userName, Enumerations.Role.Basic.ToString());DAL.Group.Save(user);DAL.UsersInGroup.Save(userID, GroupID)transaction.Complete}
This code is simplified a lot but you get the idea. All these inputs have to complete succesfully to commit the transaction otherwise we have to roll it back. Can I use TransactionScope in this scenerio? The connection to the database happens in the DAL. Lost - help please, newbie
 

View 2 Replies View Related

TransactionScope

Feb 19, 2007

Hi, I'm trying this feature like:

Using tScope As New System.Transactions.TransactionScope

intRet = ta.Insert(dr.X, dr.Y, .....)

tScope.Complete()

End Using

Works fine without the TransactionScope, but with the above code I will end up with "The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." I'm running the development server on my PC and the SQL-2000-server is a machine on the LAN. (Same domain)



View 1 Replies View Related

TransactionScope

Apr 5, 2006

Hi,

I am trying to use transactions as below:

using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope scope = new System.Transactions.TransactionScope())
{


//some code here

// Throw an exception to roll back the transaction.

// Call the Complete method to commit the transaction


}

I can't seem to get it working though. Have trided several things like Security Configuration on the MSDTC tab, restarted €œDistributed Transaction Coordinator€? Service, iisreset, different constructors on the transactionscope etc. I haven't tried running it from the same domain since this won't work with the source safe. Is it really suppose to be this "hard" to get it right??

I use Windows XP Professional 2002 service pack 2 and microsoft SQL server 2005.

Thanks for any answers on the matter...

//R

View 6 Replies View Related

TransactionScope Error

Jan 2, 2007

I am required to insert an xcel file that may contain more than 1000 records into the databse in a single transaction.
I have used Transaction scope for the same.
The code works fine on my machine, Where the database is on a win 2k machine and the application is on Win XP machine. Tha database is Sql server 2000.
When the same code is deployed at Win2k3 server, I recieved following errors,

Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.
Import of MSDTC transaction failed: XACT_E_NOTRANSACTION.
Ther error occured randomly, sometimes after 900 records and sometime after 1500 records.Many times the application successfully insert 1900 records,
 Can anybody help me? I think i am required to make some MSDTC settings.
I have checked for the firewall settings. I have increased the timeout of transactionscope as TimeSpan.Max

View 1 Replies View Related

Trying To Use TransactionScope For The First Time..................

Jan 31, 2008

I am writing my first distributed transaction application, using C# and running against SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 Server. Both Windows 2003 Server and SQL Server 2005 have their respective service pack 1's applied on this server. I am using Visual Studio 2005 Pro for development.       I am using the TransactionScope object in the System.Transaction namespace, and as I understand it, if the SystemTransaction object detects that a connection to a second SQL Server 2005 database is about to be opened, then it will promote the transaction from a lightweight transaction manager to a distributed transaction. I have stepped through the application in the debugger and found that it opens the connection just fine to the to the database, executes the stored procedure like a champ, but when it attempts to execute the second stored proc  it generates the following error messages (which I copied out of the output window):       ? ex.Message      "Communication with the underlying transaction manager has failed."      ? ex.InnerException      {"Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component."}        [System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException]: {"Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component."}        Data: {System.Collections.ListDictionaryInternal}        HelpLink: null        InnerException: null        Message: "Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component."        Source: "System.Transactions"        StackTrace: "  at System.Transactions.Oletx.IDtcProxyShimFactory.ReceiveTransaction(UInt32 propgationTokenSize, Byte[] propgationToken, IntPtr managedIdentifier, Guid& transactionIdentifier, OletxTransactionIsolationLevel& isolationLevel, ITransactionShim& transactionShim)
  at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.GetOletxTransactionFromTransmitterPropigationToken(Byte[] propagationToken)"        TargetSite: {Void ReceiveTransaction(UInt32, Byte[], IntPtr, System.Guid ByRef, System.Transactions.Oletx.OletxTransactionIsolationLevel ByRef, System.Transactions.Oletx.ITransactionShim ByRef)} 
The  Distributed Transaction Coordinator is started on the development machine and the SQL Server 2005/Windows 2003 server machine.
Any ideas?
 

View 1 Replies View Related

TransactionScope And TableAdapter

Jul 30, 2007

This thread has also been posted under '.NET Data Access and Storage'. However, I have realized that the same code contruction using SQL Server connection- and tableadapter objects work fine so I am trying to get answers here also.

I am attempting to do transactional updates to SQL Compact Edition database using TableAdapter and TransactionScope like this:


using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope())

{


SqlCeConnection sqlConn = new SqlCeConnection(connectionString);

myTableTableAdapter ta = new myTableTableAdapter();

ta.Connection = sqlConn;

ta.Update(dsmyTable.myTable);
ts.Complete();

}


dsmyTable is a strongly typed dataset created through the Dataset Designer and populated with data from the database prior to the code sample above.

This all works fine. However, when removing the call to 'ts.Complete()' to simulate the transaction rolling back, data is still stored into the database.

Am I missing something here or does TransactionScope not support SQL Compact Edition? Any help is appreciated!

Regards.

View 3 Replies View Related

Question About TransactionScope And DTC

Jul 27, 2007

My Code :



Code Snippet
using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope())
{
using (SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection(connStr))
{
sqlConn.Open(); //throw exception:The transaction has already been implicitly or explicitly committed or aborted




//do delete,update
}
scope.complete();
}



My clientsystem is winxp sp2, dbserver is win2003


Err: The transaction has already been implicitly or explicitly committed or aborted.


Type: TransactionException
StackTrace:
Server stack trace:
at System.Transactions.Oletx.OletxTransactionManager.ProxyException(COMException comException)
at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.GetExportCookie(Transaction transaction, Byte[] whereabouts)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.EnlistNonNull(Transaction tx)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.Enlist(Transaction tx)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.Activate(Transaction transaction)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionInternal.ActivateConnection(Transaction transaction)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()

Please help!


I have enable "Network DTC Access", allow both "Inbound" and "Outbound" TM communication, set it to "No Authentication Required" in DTC

I had been puzzled for servral days!
I can't find the answer and read many-large-hurge topics and blogs!

Help me,thk u!

View 3 Replies View Related

Connection Won't Enlist In TransactionScope

Nov 11, 2007

I'm getting the following stack trace when trying to use TransactionScope with multiple newly created connections. The exact same code works perfectly in MSSQL 2005. Is there something that I'm missing, or (hopefully) is this going to be fixed for release? Thanks much.

System.InvalidOperationException: The connection object can not be enlisted in transaction scope.
at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Enlist(Transaction tx)
at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Open()
at TransactionScopeBugs.DAO.get_Connection() in DAO.cs:line 35
at TransactionScopeBugs.DAO.Insert(String query) in DAO.cs:line 51
at TransactionScopeBugs.Class1.InsertRecord() in Class1.cs:line 38
at TransactionScopeBugs.Class1.TestTxScope() in Class1.cs:line 54

Class1



Code Block
[TestFixture]
public class Class1
{
protected TransactionScope scope;

[SetUp]
public void Initialize()
{
scope = new TransactionScope();
}

[TearDown]
public void TearDown()
{
scope.Dispose();
}

private int GetRowCount(DAO d)
{
using (DbCommand cmd = d.NewCommand("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TxScope", d.Connection))
{
return (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar();
}
}

private void InsertRecord()
{
DAO d = new DAO();
int num1 = GetRowCount(d);
string id = d.Insert("INSERT INTO TxScope (name) values ('txscope')");
Assert.IsNotNull(id);
Console.WriteLine(id);
int num2 = GetRowCount(d);
Assert.AreEqual(num1 + 1, num2);
}

[Test]
public void TestTxScope()
{
InsertRecord();
}
}





DAO



Code Block
public class DAO
{
private static readonly DbProviderFactory providerFactory;

static DAO()
{
providerFactory = DbProviderFactories.GetFactory("System.Data.SqlServerCe.3.5");
}

public DbConnection Connection
{
get
{
DbConnection conn = providerFactory.CreateConnection();
if (conn.State == ConnectionState.Closed)
{
conn.ConnectionString = "DataSource="txscope.sdf"";
conn.Open();
}
return conn;
}
}

public DbCommand NewCommand(String query, DbConnection conn)
{
DbCommand cmd = providerFactory.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = query;
cmd.Connection = conn;
return cmd;
}

public string Insert(String query)
{
using (DbConnection con = Connection)
{
using (DbCommand cmd = NewCommand(query, con))
{
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT @@IDENTITY";
object val = cmd.ExecuteScalar();
return val.ToString();
}
}
}
}

View 2 Replies View Related

Managing Distributed Transactions With ADO.NET 2.0 Using TransactionScope Gives Error Message

Nov 14, 2007

 Hi, I am working  on vs2005 with sql server 2000. I  have used TransactionScope class. Example Reference: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/mosessaur/TransactionScope04142006103850AM/TransactionScope.aspx   The code is given below.  using System.Transactions;   protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)    {  System.Transactions.TransactionOptions transOption = new System.Transactions.TransactionOptions();         transOption.IsolationLevel = System.Transactions.IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted;         transOption.Timeout = new TimeSpan(0, 2, 0);         using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope tranScope = new System.Transactions.TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required,transOption))         {            using (SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["nwConnString"].ConnectionString))            {                int i;                con.Open();                SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("update products set unitsinstock=100 where productid=1", con);                i = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();                if (i > 0)                {                    using (SqlConnection conInner = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["pubsConnString"].ConnectionString))                    {                        conInner.Open();                        SqlCommand cmdInner = new SqlCommand("update Salary set sal=5000 where eno=1", conInner);                        i = cmdInner.ExecuteNonQuery();                        if (i > 0)                        {                            tranScope.Complete(); // this statement commits the executed query.                        }                    }                }            }            //  Dispose TransactionScope object, to commit or rollback transaction.        } } It gives error like
 "The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8004D025)" The database I have used is northwind database and pubs database which is by default in sql server 2000. So, Kindly let me know how to proceed further.  Thanks in advance,Arun. 

View 1 Replies View Related

Select With (nolock) OR TransactionScope With Option Read Uncommitted Data

May 29, 2007

Hi Sql gurus :))I've got a question that I couldn't find a satisfying answer on the net.What is the difference between:1) running sql query (select from sth with nolock) with no transaction2) running sql query (select from sth) withing a TransactionScope with option Read Uncommitted dataBasically, both should do the same work. However is anyone aware of any potential problems using any of both approaches ?We use 1) to improve our web application scalability since the system works in such a way that any selects and updates on that table (sth) do not interfere with one another.However, updates are done in a TransactionScope. And when having simultaneous select with nolock and update in a Transaction scope (the select statement has a where clause and returns records that are not updated by the update statement). However sometimes ( we still cannot figure it out when) the select statement returns some records twice.For example, the select should return 1000 records , but (sometimes) it returns 1002 records ( the extra 2 records are copies of some of the original 1000 records).Removing the nolock, makes the problem does not appear - but i want to be 100% sure that nolock is our troublemaker. And if it is - why ?We also have a problem that this particular nolock select sometimes return even less records than it should.I know it sounds impossible but it happens.So anyone who has experience with select with nolock, please share :)Thanks in advance, Yani 

View 4 Replies View Related

Limitations In SQL?

Feb 27, 2006

I'm new to SQL so don't laugh if this is easy to spot but I'm having trouble with a select statement but I do not think it's the syntax etc, I'm convinced it must be due to some restrictions and limitations within SQL.

Could anyone shed some light? I've been 'googling' for two days now and can't find anything, much appreciated! thanks.


SELECT a.medno_id,
tblAction.action_shortdesc,
tblClassification.class_shortdesc,
tblType.type_shortdesc,
tblUnit.unit_shortdesc,
tblSystem.system_shortdesc,
a.med_oldserial,
a.med_builddate,
tblLibrary.lib_shortdesc,
a.med_f24bookno,
a.med_f24entry,
a.med_f102bookno,
a.med_f102entry,
tblTransport.trans_shortdesc,
a.med_courierno,
tblPOC.poc_surname,
a.med_title,
a.med_notes

FROM tblMedia a

INNER JOIN tblAction ON a.action_id = tblAction.action_id
INNER JOIN tblClassification ON a.class_id = tblClassification.class_id
INNER JOIN tblType ON a.type_id = tblType.type_id
INNER JOIN tblUnit ON a.unit_id = tblUnit.unit_id
INNER JOIN tblSystem ON a.system_id = tblSystem.system_id
INNER JOIN tblLibrary ON a.lib_id = tblLibrary.lib_id
INNER JOIN tblTransport ON a.trans_id = tblTransport.trans_id
INNER JOIN tblPOC ON a.poc_id = tblPOC.poc_id

WHERE a.medno_id = 327
ORDER BY a.med_effdate


I've spaced out the query so it's easy to read

I've started the query from scratch building my SQL adding one field at a time and it works perfect until it reaches a certain number of fields, it's as if SQL has a limit to no of fields it can return/be used in the select part of the statement. Are there any limitations I should know about? or am I being an idiot and doing something I shouldn't?

Hope this makes sense, thanks!

View 3 Replies View Related

Limitations

May 11, 2006

What are the limitations of the SQL 2005 Express Management Studio tools, as opposed to the full blown 2k5 Tools (i'm not referring to the Server, just the tools). I ask because the install for the 2005 Management Studio Tools alone is 878 megs.

View 1 Replies View Related

CE Limitations?

Feb 27, 2008

Hi.

I've been using CE 3.1 in a .NET/C# application. My knowledge of database technology is very basic, and I'm wondering how far I can take my application with CE, given its limitations, which I stumbled across when I read the following about VistaDB: http://www.vistadb.net/compare_sql_compact.asp

For right now, my application uses a CE database as a fancy log file. There are only two tables in the database -- one to hold the log information, and one to hold information about different "runs" of my application. The only time a row is ever updated is when a row in the latter table is updated (once) to indicate that that "run" has completed. Other than that, I only add and delete rows.

Right now, two different processes on the same CPU (the same CPU as the database) write rows to the database during a run of my application. They do this by accessing a singleton object, hosted in a Windows service, via .NET remoting. One of these processes also polls the database continually to read it for display purposes.

So. My questions are:

I can live with the single-user limitation, given my application. But what exactly is it about using CE that limits me to a single user? I never actually specify user information, as far as I know. Am I missing it?

Can I assume that the "single CPU supported" limitation simply means that it only runs on a 32-bit Windows machine, and that it has nothing to do with multiple databases running on different CPUs at runtime?

Why is it that the two processes in my application seem to be able to connect to my database concurrently, when this is apparently a limitation?
As I said, my knowledge of this technology is quite elemental. Forgive me. But I figure I'm in the right place to change that. :-)

Thanks.

Mike

View 1 Replies View Related

MSDE Limitations

Jun 22, 2004

I'd like to use MSDE since it's free instead of SQL Server for my database. I will be hosting a portal type site. If all goes well and my site is wildly successful are there any limitations in MSDE that I need to worry about?

For instance, I thought there was a limit to the number of connections. I thought I remember seeing 5 or 50 on the microsoft download site.

If there is a connection limit of say 10, what happens when connection 11 comes in? Does it just wait for a free connection or does it fail?

Is anyone using is as the database on a large portal site? How many users are there in total? How many connected at the same time?

I am under the assumption that it is SQL Server underneath, so I assume the performance and abilities are very good. Is this a fair assumption?

Thanks for the input

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Express Limitations

Jun 6, 2006

    Hi, I was curious if anyone knew if there was a way to get around SQL Express Edition 2005's limitations to support remote connections.  If I install SQL Server 2005, will there be a smooth transition between the two on my IIS 5.1 server?  My database is extremely simple and only consists of a single table without any complex queries.  Idealy, I would like to spend no money since I am a poor collge student doing this as a project.  Suggestions?

View 9 Replies View Related

Access Limitations

Jan 20, 1999

Does anyone know the limitations of access in records?

CZ

View 1 Replies View Related

Varchar Limitations

May 18, 2004

I updated a varchar field fom 500 length to 800 and now nothing works. Are there limitations to how big a varchar table entry can be and if so what is the alternative?

Cheers

View 2 Replies View Related

Limitations In A Query !!

Aug 2, 2006

Hi all there,I'm a newbee to this forum. I've a question, is there any limitationon "IN" clause in select query.for example :"SELECT EMP_ID, EMP_NAME FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE EMP_ID IN('EMP1001','EMP1002','EMP1003', etc, etc, so on)".I've read at some documentation that there is a limitation for Columnsin a table and i.e. we can have only 1024 columns per table, is thistrue?Plz help me !!Thanx in advance.Kind Regards,Harry

View 4 Replies View Related

Limitations, Compatibility

Nov 29, 2006

Hi,
What are the limitations of using the automated conversion tool and how to deal with compatability issues?
Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

SSMS-EE Limitations

Dec 12, 2007



Is it possible someone could let me know the exact differences between the SSMS Express Edition and SSMS Standard Edition?

Just simply what you cannot do in the Express edition but can in the full edition.

Thanks

View 7 Replies View Related

FTP Task Limitations

Oct 3, 2006

Hi,

I'm thinking about using the FTP task in an integration i am developing, but before i do, i need to get an idea that what i want to do is possible.

With the FTP task could i get a list of directories on the FTP server, and compare the folders with a result set returned from a SQL query. If any of the directories on the FTP site then i want to download each of the relevent directories and there contents to the local machine.

Could someone give me an idea as to if this is possible via the task, or if indeed a script task would be better?

Many thanks,

Grant

View 7 Replies View Related

CPU Limitations Of SQL Express

May 12, 2006

I had a question about the CPU limitations of SQL express. It says limited to 1 CPU but what if I have multiple instaces since the application is a new service and runs in it 'sown memory space how is it limited to 1 CPU? does the service use multiple processors and the queris are binded to one?



Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Express RAM && CPU Limitations

Mar 10, 2008

With the limitation of 1Gb of ram and 1 CPU for SQL Express, does that mean we cannot load it on a server with multiple CPU's and more ram, or that we can load it and it will only use 1CPU and 1Gb of ram?

View 7 Replies View Related

Users And Limitations

Feb 10, 2006

can sqlExpress handle 200 users all at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server XE Limitations

Jul 9, 2006

Hi,

As SQL Server XE can run on one PC maximum, does it mean that it can't support multi users??? I mean could it be installed on one server and to be used by multiple users connected to server with their PCs?

thanks in advance

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL Server Limitations

Aug 31, 2006



what are the limitations in MS SQL Server Express (for a network application)?



View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Express Limitations

Jun 21, 2006

I was looking around, and I found this info on SQL Server Express:The 4 GB database size limit applies only to data files and not to log
files. However, there are no limits to the number of databases that can be
attached to the server.Does this mean I can use several different databases in my website, like one separate db containing forum entries, and one with user details and related stuff?

View 4 Replies View Related

Record Limitations Of SQL 2000

Oct 9, 2007

Can anyone tell me if SQL 2000 has a record limitation on tables?
The table that I have is very basic. It contains 6 columns, none of which can contain more than 10 characters, but I'm already sitting at 2,500,000 records and expecting up to 20-30 million records. Can it handle it?
Thanks in advance.
 

View 2 Replies View Related

Identity Column Limitations

Nov 27, 2000

Is there a numeric limitation to using the identity value, or is it limited by the integer data type limitation

View 1 Replies View Related

Practical Limitations With SQL Server

Oct 12, 2000

We are primarily a DB2 and Oracle shop. There are movements towards SQL Server for smaller applications. We would like to know if anyone out there has shop standards in determining which database should go with what type of application. What we are looking for are possibly database sizes, number of concurrent users, hardware and software cost, network infrastructure, security, scalability, and development tools. Any information would be appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Overcome Xp_cmdshell Limitations?

Mar 6, 2008

Hi.

I really need to call an external application with GUI but xp_cmdshell does not allow it. Is there any way to do this?

Thanks in advance for replays.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved