Transfer Data Between Two Remote Servers
Sep 26, 2005
Hi, I'm looking for an artical or Someone who can explain me what is the best way to transfer data between two remot database?
I'll Explane:
two business have local SqlServer in their office.
1 of business need to get Specific data from other. each database is protected. how can I read ake information of it?
Thanks.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 8, 2006
Hello,
I want to transfer data in between two or more sql servers. Actually One server is on the web while others are in small networks in diffrent locations.
I want to update the main server with the changes in local servers. My problem is if the connection goes failed in between process of data transfer then how will it be recovered that how much of data is uploaded and how much is left.
Please I need help on this isue.
Thanks in advance
pronov
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2008
Hi,
Not sure thisis the right forum for my question.
I have to insert data from one table into another. The problem is that the 2 tables are on different servers and computers for that matter. I only need data that is in one specific table.
What is the easiest and most efficient way to do that.
If I access the 2 computers via remote desktop from my computer and actually go and copy the data from the table in computer 1 and paste it inside the table in computer 2 it does paste the data.However, for some reason it doesn't paste all the data. The column datatype is ntext.
I mean if the entry is for example 'hello world how are you today? blah bla blah'
It will only paste 'hello world how are'
I will appreciate your help.
Many thanks
Whisky-my beloved dog who died suddenly on the 29/06/06-I miss u so much.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2006
Hi,
I've got a quick question here. I'm still quite new to SQL Server. My question is how to transfer file between SQL Servers. For example, i have been working on the database - updating or editing some tables in the SQL Server 2000 at my end. Then, i need to pass whichever tables got updated on to my client who also uses the SQL Server 2000. So we have two separate SQL Servers 2000. i wonder how to transfer data like tables between the two SQL Servers.
Thank you in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2004
Hello to all,
my problem is about the slow execution of a query.
I have two database located in two different servers. The servers are linked with the linked server connection made with the enterprice manager.
The databases structure is the same and I copy some data from a database to the other with the following query:
INSERT INTO DATASERVER.RESULTS.dbo.Tab_Tests SELECT * FROM LINESERVER.WIP.dbo.Tab_Tests WHERE ID_Result = '{76271FC1-9470-4EF7-A403-000CF75C2215}' OR ID_Result = '{08C8EEB9-CD22-4CF9-8269-8C1CC58C752B}' OR ID_Result = '{B7B7EED1-36E4-48FA-9636-ABBE62AAE04D}' OR ID_Result = '{8F7BA69E-D2CE-4EB2-BBC4-AFFA165CE0CE}' OR ID_Result = '{273CB805-945F-4EFA-AE20-BC4E0898A19F}'
Everything works till the database grows up more than 400 MB.
Also if I select one result, that consist of some records, the query is very slow and the CPU is working over the 75 %.
I ask you if my working way is corret or if you have some solution or some explanation for me.
Thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello AllI was wondering if there's a way to monitor/measure data-transferbeing taking place between 2 serves in a replicated environment.I cannot see any counters, etc. to monitor this..??thanksSunit
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2007
Hello everyone,
Here's my situation...
I'm running a web service which involves 51 seperate servers and databases.
There are fifty licensee servers (One for each US state) and one corporate server.
Each night I need to upload sales and membership data from the licensee's databases to the corporate database to compile reports.
The application platform I'm using is ASP.NET 2.0 and the the database is SQL2005 express.
I want this process to be run automatically, so I believe it's a scheduled windows service I need to setup up in .NET to make the data transfers.
If anyone has already set something up like this, or knows the steps to take? I would love to have your input.
Thanks in advance,
Robert
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2008
Hi All:
I'm looking for some advice. We have multiple remote SQL Server 2005 systems at various clients that all contain the same WorkTrack database. We need to send this data on a daily basis from all of these remote servers to our main server (ChemWeb/Spindle) in our corporate office. The thing is that we need to do this over standard HTTP - no VPN connection, etc.
So I'm thinking of using SQL 2005 Web services to do such. Here's my plan (the name of the Database on the client side and server is WorkTrack, and SDP is the acronym I am using for a Spindle Data Packet which contains the data to be updated from the client)
1. Every day update a WorkTrack_SDP database on the client server that will contain all of the data from WorkTrack (name of Spindle Client Database) that has changed since the last SDP transfer. This WorkTrack_SDP database will only contain the tables from the WorkTrack database that are necessary for transfer to the ChemWeb/Spindle server
2. The WorkTrack_SDP database will have the same schema as the WorkTrack database with one additional Customer_No column in each table.
3. All of the tables in WorkTrack_SDP database will be truncated before insertion of updated data.
4. An acknowledgement of the previous SDP transfer and ChemWeb/Spindle Server update will be required before this process will proceed.
5. There will be an additional table in the Client WorkTrack database to track SDP transfers.
a. Date/Time range of updated data of each transfer
b. When the transfer was sent
c. When the transfer was completed.
6. Create SPROC’s on the ChemWeb/Spindle server to serve as SQL Endpoints (Web Services) to update/insert data from client systems to WorkTrack_SDP database on the ChemWeb/Spindle Server.
7. Create SPROC on ChemWeb/Spindle server that will transfer data from WorkTrack_SDP into WorkTrack
Any thoughts & comments are greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Ken Blum
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2007
am an authenticated user of a remote data base
I can log in using sql server management studio and add tables and
even I can back up the database .
Good.
But I want to get a copy of the
database to my local computer
Is there any way to do
this?The problem is that i don't have access to the directory of sql sever pleases tel me a way that is possible just by using sql server or any add on on it
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 1999
Hi ALL,
I transferred objects of one to the other database from a development server to a production server using Database / Object Transfer tool in SQL Server 6.5. I found some of stored procedures and views didn’t go from the development server to the production server. I am wondering if there is a bug in SQL Server 6.5 (with SP5a) or I did something wrong.
Does someone know what is this problem?
Thanks in advanced,
Stella Liu
Express - The Limited Inc.
614-415-4446
Sliu@express.style.com
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2006
I have SQL Server 2000 installed on one hard drive. I just installed SQL Server 2000 to another hard drive. I'd like to be able to transfer all the registered servers (including the group they belonged to) to the new SQL Server. Is there an easy way to do this? Otherwise, it seems that I have to go to "Client Network Utility" and register each server again, which are a lot of servers.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2015
As we all know logins and jobs aren't replicated when using AllwaysOn. What i wanna know is if the "tranfer login taks" will be enough to cover the transfer of logins between servers.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2005
Hello
I have a production database that i need to refresh to our test environment daily. The database size is 700 MB.
I do not need to transfer the stored procedures and triggers , users and logins.
Would a DTS package that runs every night be the best and the easiest solution to implement or should i look into log shipping and snapshot replication.
thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2007
Hi there,
This is my first post in these forums. Actually i am having some problem in transfering Database from one server to another.
From my source server, i have managed to make a .BAK file(size Around 1.5 GB) through SQL Backup. Now i have that file on my local machine. I want to transfer that database to another remote machine.
I tried 1 thing: i restore that .bak file to my local machine and tried to use export utility...... it started uploading. but after some time. it shows the following error.
I am from programming background. and i am not sure that what i am trying to do is the best solution for my problem. Can you please suggest me any method with which i can acomplish this task. And if i am going right then can u please tell me where i am going wrong.
I am using SQL Server 2005. and i want to transfer the full Database including all the objects i.e. Store Procedures, triggers etc.
Thanks Alot
Gurpreet Singh Dhaliwal
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2008
Is it possible/advisable when transfering very large amounts of data from server to server to:
trasnfer the data to a new table first
second alter new table adding indexes, defaults, ets based on original table
if it is what flow item would be used to transfer/alter the indexes and defaults?
I'm very new to ssis so the more detail you can give the better.
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2001
Hi Everybody,
Can anybody help me on Remote Servers. I want to create a remote server
from 6.5 to 7.0. Is it possible to create a remote server from 6.5 to 7.0?.
From the Books online I saw remote server related commands. Like Linked servers in 7.0, tables of 7.0 can be extracted like "select * from <Remote_server>.<Database>.<Owner>.<Table_name>", in 6.5 Remote servers?. How do we execute a stored procedure of 7.0 Database from 6.5 server in remote server?.
Can anybody guide me on the above topics.
Tks in advance,
Sam
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2000
How do I add a remote SQL server to a local SQL server so that I can query it
using the normal T-SQL syntax. I have already tried using the following syntax:
sp_addlinkedserver @server = '233.56.152.112',
@srvproduct = N'SQL Server'
This caused the server to show up in the linked servers under Security folder in the Enterprise Manager GUI.
BUT WHEN RUNNING THE FOLLOWING QUERY:
(Select * from 233.56.152.112].remoteDATABASE.dbo.remoteTABLE)
I GET THE FOLLOWING ERROR:
[OLE/DB provider returned message: Client unable to establish connection]
[DBNMPNTW]ConnectionOpen (CreateFile()).
ANY GUIDANCE IS GREATLY APPRECIATED
THANKS
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 1998
I am trying to get 1 SQL Server to update another SQL Server.
I have followed the examples in the books on-line and did have some success until I rebooted one of the servers.
I need a step by step process of how to set up the communication link to these servers.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2006
Hi,
I uploaded a database to a remote server (ISP) who has SQL2005 as do I. They got the database okay, but not all the stored procedures went along for the ride
Can anyone tell me how to just simply transfer the stored procedures only to the remote server?
Failing that, can you tell me how to export the entire database and be sure that it all goes, not just the tables. I assume you would have to do this via a script because the export wizard only lets you copy the files and I have dome this but the stored procedures do go along.
Any help?
Tia
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2006
Hello,This is my first post, and i am looking for help about Databases in remote servers.This is my problem:1) I have a free account in "HostBasket", with 50 mb of space, and 10 mb of SQL Server... with ASP.NET 2 support --> http://www.hostbasket.com/dotnet2.shtml?LinkFrom=100602) They gave me this info for the database:Your SQL Server: sql15.hostbasket.comYour database name: myDatabaseNameYour login for the database: myLoginYour password for the database: myPasswordConnection string for ASP.NET (using ADO.NET with System.Data.SqlClient namespace):Persist Security Info=True;User ID=myLogin;Password=myPassword;Initial Catalog=MyDatabaseName;Data Source=sql15.hostbasket.com 3) Actually, i don't know what to do with that info... I mean, i have read so much info, and all people saying "their way" to do things... oh, I am so confused...4) I read in a website, this: "the database can be uploaded as a FILE saved in the App_Data folder, under the .mdf extension"I read that from : http://dotnetjunkies.com/QuickStartv20/aspnet/doc/data/vwd.aspx5) In the url given above, there is a "step by step" example... i follow it, exactly (i start a asp.net website, i create the database and the table, i show the data with the grids, etc )6) All is OK until here, i mean, when i run the website with VWD, it shows me the info OK.7) But... ¿How can i do this works on the Remote Server i described in 1) and 2) ?I know how to upload my website, in fact i uploaded a very basic one, and all was OK, but when i work with databases starts my problem...So, i am almost sure, that i have an error in the "Conecction String"... connectionString="Data Source=.SQLExpress;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|MiBaseDeDatos.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" ¿How should it be, to work with my free remote server?or,if you have done the "easy way" of uploading the .MDF file in the server (but a server different of mine) please, tell me the "how to..." (and the server you used :p )--------------------Ok guys, i am a Chilean young (i dont speak english very well) and i tried to write my ideas in an easy way, so I REALLY HOPE you can help me.I am a New (very new) on this (vwd , .net , asp.net ) in fact, i am using this just 3 days ago...THANK YOU SO MUCH,Carlos,La Serena, Chile.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2000
Please help me! We have a server that was renamed some time ago and, for some reason, the old name is now in SQL 6.5 in remote servers. I can't remove it because it keeps saying that it is "not defined as a remote server at the site."
This is a problem because when I try to set up the server for replication as a subscriber, it gives me the same message and won't let me go any further. It's kind of a catch-22; It's not a valid server so it should be removed, but when I try to remove it, it fails because it's not a valid server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2002
Hi, all -
I know you can execute stored procedures on remote servers in SQL Server 6.5, but can you run regular queries as well using the 4 part name qualification?
Example: select * from server1.database1.dbo.table1
If not, is there another way I can manipulate data on remoter servers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 1999
Hi
I have two SQL Servers (6.5). One based in London (LDNINNTS9) and one in New York (NYINNTS2).
I had bidirectional replication set up on one table in a DB and everything is (WAS!!!) working fine. Came to work this morning (Monday typical!) and the following has happened.
When I select the remote servers option on the NY server from Enterprise manager I get the following error message
Unable to connect to site '0'because '' is not defined as a remote server.
Now it says that '' is not defined as a remote server. So I did a select of @@Servername and it has returned (null). It was set to NYINNTS2. I have tried executing some ISQL to change the name and started and stopped the SQL Services but the name remains (null). Does anyone have an idea of what I can do to set the name up as it was?
I know that the Server name gets set to null if it is invalid, but I am trying to set it to NYINNTS2, which should not be invalid? Does the domain name impact the validity of the name?
HELP!!!!
Regards
Steve Farmer
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2008
Hi all,
Currently, my (small) intranet site is storing it's data on a remote SQL server. The danger with this, as has happened several times now, is that the application is twice as vulnerable; if either the webserver or the dataserver malfunctions or is unreachable, the application won't work.
I only recently discovered the possibility to use local database files (MDF files), and this seems like a much better solution for my site. But now I want to transfer the tables that are residing on the dataserver, to the MDF file. The database only contains tables. How do I handle this? I do not have access to the dataserver, only to a few databases that are residing on it. Is this possible using Visual Studio 2008? I have read about a "Bulk Copy Program" (bcp) which is included with SQL Server, but I cannot find a download for just that application.
Or is this totally not the way to go? I've discovered MDF files are a bit more problematic with concurrent connections; having tables open in Visual Studio results in "Site offline" or "Cannot open database" error messages on the website. Problems I've never had to deal with using SQL Server, but they are only minor problems.
Thanks,
Peter
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 11, 1999
Hi,
I've SQL 7 running on windows NT 4.0 server.
From my Sql server when I tried to register a remote server in the same office, I couldn't.
When I get the new registration wizard, I could see the server(s) I want to register. But when I finish all the steps in the wizard, it says: Unable to establish client connection.Connection Open(Create File).
I tried using both sql standard and win nt security (logins) but didn't work.
Help please.
Thanks,
Kiran
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2002
Hi
Is there a way (workaround) of running a remote stored
procedure as pass through query and without having to use
linked servers. Something similar OPENROWSET when
selecting form a remote object?
Many thanks
Tariq
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2008
Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 16.
Login failed for user 'XXXXXX.COMusername'.
On the remote servers I enabled Named Pipes and TCP/IP and activated the Browser.
Here's what's strange: I can connect to one server but not any other.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2000
Hi Everybody,
Can anyone tell me what is the difference between Remote Server and Linked Servers.
thks in advance,
Srinivasan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2008
Can someone please shed some light on what seems to me to be a common requirement.
If I create an alias or linked server to Server1 - say Alias1 - on Server1 and then use that name in a query on Server1, a remote/distributed query is always used (even though we are running on the local server and that overhead is completely unnecessary).
Is SQL Server really not capable of deciding that
select * from Alias1.db1.dbo.table1
and
select * from Server1.db1.dbo.table1
should be optimized and executed exactly the same when Alias1 is Server1, but that it is a distributed query ONLY when Alias1 is really referring to a remote server? I realize that the four part name is not necessary when I am referring to objects on the current server, but I am trying to write code that is server instance independent.
It just seems that if that is not possible, then the only way to create system independent stored procs that can run in dev, staging, and production environments and work with multiple databases on multiple servers is to create all sorts of scripts to regenerate all the procs whenever you move a database between servers?
If SQL Server is even close to the enterprise big iron server that MS now claims it is, it surely needs to support running in dev, staging, and production environments and work with multiple databases on multiple servers?!
I'm really looking for someone to tell me I'm missing something simple, and of course you can do this - but complex workarounds are invited too :-)
This is not something I am investigating as an academic exercise, I am already doing this, but I have to figure out how to do it better because with all these unnecessary distributed queries, performance is horrible.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2008
I am pulling my hair out having built my first application using WWF, I have moved the application off the development machine to a machine ready for production for the persistence store will now be on a remote server.
I cannot create a connection string for the persistence store that will allow me to attach to the mdb on the remote server.
the original connection string in development was:
Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename='C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataWorkflowPersistenceStore.mdf';Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30;User Instance=False
I cannot create an equivalent string that does not return a error like this one:
An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataWorkflowPersistenceStore.mdf failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share.
I did simply copy the WorkFlowPersistenceStore.mdf from the development machine to the server machine (completely independant environments) - It has worked in the past for other non wwf databases - Is there something particular about the wwf database that would have prevented this?
I have tried making the persistence store permanently attached (in the development environment) but this returns a different error that implies that a permanently attached database is not allowed - so I assume that the persistence service HAS to have a detached database - Am I correct?
I have tried a UNC naming that is the same on both the machine with the server and the client machine e.g. \MACHINEwwfWorkflowPersistenceStore.mdb - but that still returns an error - Is that not allowed? (or is that not allowed) - does the file path for an attached database have to be recognisable by the client machine, the server machine or both?
MUST the User Instance be True or False or does it not really matter
It is probably obvious that I am not confident in the whole area of connection strings and the effect of different parameters and the truth is I am not certain that I have not completely confused the SQL Server with the various attempts I have made.
Is there someone who could confirm that I am in the right area and could give me an example of what SHOULD work in a situation I have described so that I know that I am roughly right and to keep trying or I am barking up the wrong tree?
Thanks in anticipation!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2014
Is there any way I can deny connection from SSMS only from remote servers?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2007
Using Bulk Insert Task extensively in our solution. Everything was working great till we deployed it in stage columns. The database server is different from application servers. We have ASP.NET web services driving SSIS packages on application server. After struggling thru several security issues to get this working (ended up creating an application pool with a domain account) we are now stuck with this problem. On a different note still don't understand what specific security permission is available to domain account that makes it work.
Read in some blog that SQL Server 2005 SP2 Beta had this (Bulk Insert) fixed but not in final production version. Is there a specific reason why this is so?
SSIS and the API is quite easy to work with but associated security and deployment issues are not always clear. A lot of answers seem to be coming from end users - thanks a lot to all for sharing your experiences - sadly not presented clearly in SSIS documentation.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2014
In the full recovery model, if i run a transaction that inserts 10MB of data into a table, then 10 MB of data is moved in the data file. Does this mean then that the log file will grow by exactly 10MB as well?
I understand that all transactions are logged to the log file to enable rollback and point in time recovery, but what is actually physically stored in the log file for this transactions record? Is it the text of the command from the transaction or the actual physical data from that transaction?
I ask because say if I have two drives, one with 5MB/s write speed for the log file and one with 10MB/s write speed for the data file, if I start trying to insert 10 MB of data per second into the table, am I going to be limited to 5MB/s by the log file drive, or is SQL server not going to try and log all 10 MB each second to the log file?
View 6 Replies
View Related