Trigger (Instead Of Update) Doesn't Allow My Table Been Updated.
Mar 8, 2008I have a Trigger Instead of Update.
When I Update my table, the trigger runs correctly but my table never is updated.
I have a Trigger Instead of Update.
When I Update my table, the trigger runs correctly but my table never is updated.
Hi guys, may I know is it possible to create an update trigger like this ? Assuming there are two database, database A and database B and both are having same tables called 'Payments' table. I would like to update the Payments records on database A automatically after Payments records on database B had been updated. I can't use replication because both tables might having different records and some records are the same. Hope can get any assistance here, thank you.
Best Regards,
Hans
Hi,
I am creating update trigger(After) on a table.I want to catch an updated row and insert the values of this row into
a new table.How can i catch this row while creating a trigger after update.
Hi,
I'm using sql-2005.
I want to update several columns in different tables whenever an update is happend on specific table. I have a trigger for that which update all the relevant places when it fires.
I want to do this update only if certains columns were changed, otherwise - do anything, to reduce performance.
How Can I know which columns were updated inside the trigger? The tables has many columns and only if 2 of them were changed then I need to update other tables.
Many thanks,
Nira.
Im using a trigger to check updates on particular table and execute a email. it works but it doesnt show the right record
im looking into one table called SiteInfo.
here is my code
Im using sql 2005, can someone look at my code or the select statement.
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author: <Author,,Name>
-- Create date: <Create Date,,>
-- Description: <Description,,>
-- =============================================
CREATE TRIGGER TTSUpdate
ON SiteInfo
FOR UPDATE
AS
declare @SiteID varchar(10)
declare @Body2 varchar(2000)
declare @Sitename varchar(50)
declare @TTSCreate varchar(30)
declare @TTSCreator varchar(50)
declare @Subject2 varchar (100)
SELECT @SiteID = SiteID,@Sitename = AccountName,@TTSCreator = TTSOwner,@TTSCreate = TTSCreatedDate
from SiteInfo
SET @Body2 = 'New TTS site created: ' + @Sitename + ' With TTS Site ID:' + @SiteID + ' TTS was created on: ' + @TTSCreate + ' By:' + @TTSCreator
SET @subject2 = 'New TTS site created: ' + @Sitename
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail
@profile_name = 'TTSAdmin',
@recipients = 'email address here',
@subject = @subject2,
@body = @body2
GO
Hi
Apologies if this is a silly question
I have a basic table "Customer" which has
Id
Address1
Address2
Address3
Town
County
Postcode
SearchData
After I insert or Update a row in this table I need to update the SearchData column
with
UPPER(ADDRESS1) + UPPER(ADDRESS2) + UPPER(TOWN) + UPPER(POSTCODE)
only for that Id
I'm sure this is only a basic update but all the examples I can find are for inserting into other tables not the row itself.
Regards
David
I've gotten conflicting info about this in the past so I thought I'd try to get clarification.
When a record is deleted, I'm sure it fires the delete trigger. Does it also fire the update trigger?
Thanks
Hi,
I have a trigger set on TABLE1 so that any update to this column should set off trigger to write to the AUDIT log table, it works fine otherwise but not the very first time when table1 has null in the column. if i comment out
and i.req_fname <> d.req_fname from the where clause then it works fine the first time too. Seems like null value of the column is messing things up
Any thoughts?
Here is my t-sql
Insert into dbo.AUDIT (audit_req, audit_new_value, audit_field, audit_user)
select i.req_guid, i.req_fname, 'req_fname', IsNull(i.req_last_update_user,@default_user) as username from inserted i, deleted d
where i.req_guid = d.req_guid
and i.req_fname <> d.req_fname
Thanks,
leo
Hi SQL fans,I realized that I often encounter the same situation in a relationdatabase context, where I really don't know what to do. Here is anexample, where I have 2 tables as follow:__________________________________________ | PortfolioTitle|| Portfolio |+----------------------------------------++-----------------------------+ | tfolio_id (int)|| folio_id (int) |<<-PK----FK--| tfolio_idfolio (int)|| folio_name (varchar) | | tfolio_idtitle (int)|--FK----PK->>[ Titles]+-----------------------------+ | tfolio_weight(decimal(6,5)) |+-----------------------------------------+Note that I also have a "Titles" tables (hence the tfolio_idtitlelink).My problem is : When I update a portfolio, I must update all theassociated titles in it. That means that titles can be either removedfrom the portfolio (a folio does not support the title anymore), addedto it (a new title is supported by the folio) or simply updated (atitle stays in the portfolio, but has its weight changed)For example, if the portfolio #2 would contain :[ PortfolioTitle ]id | idFolio | idTitre | poids1 2 1 102 2 2 203 2 3 30and I must update the PortfolioTitle based on these values :idFolio | idTitre | poids2 2 202 3 352 4 40then I should1 ) remove the title #1 from the folio by deleting its entry in thePortfolioTitle table2 ) update the title #2 (weight from 30 to 35)3 ) add the title #4 to the folioFor now, the only way I've found to do this is delete all the entriesof the related folio (e.g.: DELETE TitrePortefeuille WHERE idFolio =2), and then insert new values for each entry based on the new givenvalues.Is there a way to better manage this by detecting which value has to beinserted/updated/deleted?And this applies to many situation :(If you need other examples, I can give you.thanks a lot!ibiza
View 8 Replies View RelatedHello
I am a newbie creating triggers and I would like to know what is the name of the updated logical table. That is, since the are identifiers like "inserted" and "deleted" that represent the inserted and deleted rows, respectivaly, I presumed that "updated" existed - but it does not.
I have a table with a column named "UpdatedTimeStamp" which I would like to update anytime the other columns are modified. I intended to create the following trigger:
create trigger myTrigger
on myTable
after update
as
update updated set UpdateTimeStamp=GetDate()
Of course, "updated" is not a valid identifier that represents the updated row.
Please, help me in creating this trigger. What is the correct way of doing a trigger like this?
Thanks a lot in advanced.
Hi All,
I am using a trigger. I want to get the data of a row before updating inside this trigger and insert it into a backup table. Please anybody help me. Example with code is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
I am having a hard time understanding triggers. My goal is to put a trigger on table x where records are UPDATED or DELETED. When this trigger fires I need to take the record ID and put the ID modified record into table y with the date modified. so basically logging the recordid changed with the getDate()
I don't quite understand how to get the rowid of the modified record.
If the id1 will change in table1 it should also change the corresponding id1 field in table2 it does not do anything.
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[IDCHANGE]
ON [dbo].[table1]
AFTER UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
[Code] .....
Hello,
I am using SQL Server 2005 and ASP.NET 2.0. We have a very simple content management system where we have to keep track of date last modified for each row in all of our content tables. I know there's a "timestamp" datatype that is used for replication scenarios, but is there anything similar that I can use to set up a date_modified column for each of my content tables that will automatically update with GETDATE() whenever anything in a given row is updated?
Or do I have to create a date_modified column of smalldatetime datatype and write a trigger on update for EVERY single table of content that I have in the database? It seems there should be an easier way to do this than to write 20 triggers for my 20 content tables.
Thanks!
I am looking to created a trigger that inserts records into a log table to show the stored porcedure that has updated a specific column to a specific value in a specific table
At present I have:
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trUpdaterTable]
ON [dbo].[t_account]-- A DB level trigger
FOR UPDATE
--Event we want to capture
AS
IF update (document_status)
[Code] ...
However this doesn't appear to bring back the procedure that triggered the update...
The value the trigger should update on is document_status = 0
DDLProcExecutedByEventDate
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 07:42:01.677
NULLNULLLOMBDA im64602015-06-25 07:51:34.503
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 07:52:01.610
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 08:02:01.417
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trTableupdateaccount] ON [DoesMore].[dbo].[t_account]
[Code] ....
Here is my problem: I've created a table in MSSQL named MyReferences and then a typed dataset to connect to it.
Then I realized that I needed to add a column to MyReferences table and then I did it.
The problem is that I cannot find a way to add the new column to the typed dataset. I am unable to view it in the available columns.
Can anyone help me?
I'm using Visual Studio 2005 sp1 and C#.
Best regards
Alessandro
I want to update a field with a trigger only if a specific field is updated.
When I try the code below, it updates the field when any field in the record is updated. Is there a way to only make look at picked_dt?
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[UpdatePickedDate]
on [dbo].[oeordlin_sql]
after update
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
[Code] .....
Are there any limitations or gotchas to updating the same table whichfired a trigger from within the trigger?Some example code below. Hmmm.... This example seems to be workingfine so it must be something with my specific schema/code. We'reworking on running a SQL trace but if anybody has any input, fireaway.Thanks!create table x(Id int,Account varchar(25),Info int)GOinsert into x values ( 1, 'Smith', 15);insert into x values ( 2, 'SmithX', 25);/* Update trigger tu_x for table x */create trigger tu_xon xfor updateasbegindeclare @TriggerRowCount intset @TriggerRowCount = @@ROWCOUNTif ( @TriggerRowCount = 0 )returnif ( @TriggerRowCount > 1 )beginraiserror( 'tu_x: @@ROWCOUNT[%d] Trigger does not handle @@ROWCOUNT[color=blue]> 1 !', 17, 127, @TriggerRowCount) with seterror, nowait[/color]returnendupdate xsetAccount = left( i.Account, 24) + 'X',Info = i.Infofrom deleted, inserted iwhere x.Account = left( deleted.Account, 24) + 'X'endupdate x set Account = 'Blair', Info = 999 where Account = 'Smith'
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have following T-SQL statement:-
insert into [dbo].[tbl_FG_Alert_Count_All_Report] ([Date] ,[Count] ,[Rule Type])
SELECT TOP 10 [Date]
,[Count]
,[Rule Type]
FROM [dbo].[tbl_FG_Alert_Count_All] where Count <>'0' and DATEDIFF(dy,date,GETDATE()) = 1 order by Date desc
When I ran this T-SQL statement in SSMS; I don't get any error and as expected, I can see new data in [dbo].
[tbl_FG_Alert_Count_All_Report] table.
Now I created one job with same T-SQL Statement. Job completes successfully with out giving any error message; But unfortunately I don't see any new data in [dbo].[tbl_FG_Alert_Count_All_Report] table. What would be the reason that I don't see new data when job completes successfully but I can see new data after executing same T-SQL statement in SSMS?
I have a table where table row gets updated multiple times(each column will be filled) based on telephone call in data.
Initially, I have implemented after insert trigger on ROW level thinking that the whole row is inserted into table will all column values at a time. But the issue is all columns are values are not filled at once, but observed that while telephone call in data, there are multiple updates to the row (i.e multiple updates in the sense - column data in row is updated step by step),
I thought to implement after update trigger , but when it comes to the performance will be decreased for each and every hit while row update.
I need to implement after update trigger that should be fired on column level instead of Row level to improve the performance?
Hello
I've to write an trigger for the following action
When a entry is done in the table Adoscat79 having in the index field Statut_tiers the valeur 1 and a date in data_cloture for a customer xyz
all the entries in the same table where the no_tiers is the same as the one entered (many entriers) should have those both field updated
statut_tiers to 1
and date_cloture to the same date as entered
the same action has to be done when an update is done and the valeur is set to 1 for the statut_tiers and a date entered in the field date_clture
thank you for your help
I've never done a trigger before
I am trying to update one table when records are inserted in another table.
I have added the following trigger to the table “ProdTr” and every time a record is added I want to update the field “Qty3” in the table “ActInf” with a value from the inserted record.
My problem appears to be that I am unable to fill the variables with values, and I cannot understand why it isn’t working, my code is:
ALTER trigger [dbo].[antall_liter] on [dbo].[ProdTr]
for insert
as
begin
declare @liter as decimal(28,6)
[Code] ....
I have an update trigger which fires from a transactiion table to update a parent record in another table. I am getting no errors, but also no update. Any help appreciated (see script below)
create trigger tr_cmsUpdt_meds on dbo.medisp for UPDATE as
if update(pstat)
begin
update med
set REC_FLAG = 2
from deleted dt
where med.uniq_id = dt.uniq_id
and dt.pstat = 2
and dt.spec_flag = 'kop'
end
I have an Order header table (ORDER_HEADER) and I want to update a lines table (ORDER_LINES), colum DATE via a trigger (when UPDATE or INSERT).
What is the synthax ?
Thanks
I have a trigger on an orders table. It checks against a patientmaster table to see if the sentflag is set to n or y. If it is "n" I need to push a record to a table on a separate db table. The user has permissions on the orders table. Without having the user be added and given permissions on the second db and table, what would be the best approach inside the trigger to handle this. I am using nt/sql security for this
View 3 Replies View RelatedAm in a small fix. my Trigger is updating my entire table records , i don't want that, i want to update a column in the record that is updated by my application using a trigger that tracks updates on that table.
Is there a way i can track the updated record on my table and then update a field in that record through my TRIGGER?
My database is MSSQLServer2005 Enterprise Edition..
Below is my code
CREATE TRIGGER [TR_Employee]
ON [Test_1_1].[dbo].[Employee]
For UPDATE
Not For Replication
AS
BEGIN
Update Employee set Last_Changed = (select getDate())
END
Go
Yemi
I am new to triggers and need help on the following:
I have a hourly table that inserts new rows every hour but I need to either Insert or Update the daily table with the sum of the reading from the hourly table. If a row exist in the daily table with the date of the hourly table, then I need to update this row but if it doesn't exist, I need to insert this row.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alan
I need to create trigger on table which will not allow to update value "1" into column and if tried to update.. then it should show error massage "Good To GO"
ID Name Roll
1 Ron 1
2 Jon 0
3 Nil 3
4 Par 1
if you try to update value "1" in Roll then it will through error
nil
I currently have 2 tables as follows:CREATE TABLE [CRPDTA].[F55MRKT119](mhan8 int,mhac02 varchar(5),mhmot varchar(5),mhupmj int)GOCREATE TABLE [CRPDTA].[F55MRKT11](mdan8 int,mdac02 varchar(5),mdmot varchar(5),mdmail int,mdmag int,mdupmj int)What I would like to do is place a trigger on F55MRKT119 which willinsert records to the F55MRKT11 if they do not exist in that tablebased on the [mdan8] field. If the record does exist I would likeUpdate the corresponding record and increment either the [MDMAIL] orthe [MDMAG] based on the inserted [MHMOT]. What I have so far is asfollows:TRIGGER #1:CREATE TRIGGER trgIns_Summary ON [CRPDTA].[F55MRKT119]FOR INSERTASBEGININSERT INTO CRPDTA.F55MRKT11select INS.MHAN8, INS.MHAC02, INS.MHMOT,case when INS.MHMOT='MAG' then 0 ELSE 1 end,case when INS.MHMOT='MAG' then 1 ELSE 0 end,'0' from INSERTED INSWHERE ins.mhan8 not in(select mdan8 from crpdta.f55MRKT11)ENDTRIGGER #2:CREATE TRIGGER trgUpd_Summary ON [CRPDTA].[F55MRKT119]FOR UpdateASBEGINUPDATE CRPDTA.F55MRKT11SET MDMAIL= case when INS.MHMOT='MAG' then 0+MDMAILwhen INS.MHMOT<>'MAG' then 1+MDMAIL end,MDMAG= case when INS.MHMOT='MAG' then 1+MDMAGwhen INS.MHMOT<>'MAG' then 0+MDMAG endfrom INSERTED INS JOIN CRPDTA.F55MRKT11on(ins.mhan8=mdan8)ENDFor instance if I do the following insert:INSERT INTO CRPDTA.F55MRKT119VALUES('212131','VK4','AL4','0')thenINSERT INTO CRPDTA.F55MRKT119VALUES('212131','VK4','MAG','0')This is what I expect in both tables:[CRPDTA.F55MRKT119] (2 Records)MHAN8 MHAC02 MHMOT MHUPMJ------ ------ ----- ------212131 VK4 AL4 0212131 VK4 MAG 0[CRPDTA.F55MRKT11] (1 Record)MDAN8 MDAC02 MDMOT MDMAIL MDMAG MDUPMJ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------212131 VK4 AL4 1 1 0The insert part works fine in that it iserts in both tables with thecorrect values. However it seems as if the Update protion is failingfor some reason. WHat I have tried so far is setting the trigger orderfor the update to run first and vice-versa, but still no luck. Anyhelp would be appreciated.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,Does anyone know of a simple way to do this? I want to create aninsert trigger for a table and if the record already exists based onsome criteria, I want to update the table with the values that arepassed in via the insert trigger without having to use all the 'set'statements for each field (so if we add fields in the future I won'thave to update the trigger). In other words, I want the trigger codeto look something like this:if exists (select * from TableA where Fld1 = inserted.Fld1) then//don't do insert, do an update instead (would i want to rollback here?and will I have access to the 'inserted' table still?)Update TableASet TableA.<all the fields> = Inserted.<all the fields>where Fld1 = inserted.Fld1end ifAny help or ideas would be appreciated.Thanks,Teresa
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,I need to update a field in about 20 records on a table. The table hasan update trigger (which updates the [lastedited] field whenever arecord is updated). As a result I'm getting an error: "Subqueryreturned more than 1 value.", and the update fails.Is there a way in the stored procedure to handle this issue?thanks for your help.Paul
View 2 Replies View Related
I have created a simple trigger that updates a table called documents in my database. When a row has been inserted it will change the field form_type to 'cabinet A' if a document_type is equal to 'form'.
Im fairly new to triggers and Im uncertain whether this trigger is updating the whole table or the new row? I only want the new row to be updated as the table is fairly large.
create trigger file_documents
on documents_table
after insert
as
begin
update documents_table
set cabinet = 'Cabinet A'
where document_type = 'FORM' end
Setup:
Using SQL 2005
TableA
ID INT PK
Name VARCHAR
RefID FK
ID Name RefID
1 Test1 <NULL>
2 Test1a 1
3 Test1b 1
4 Test1b1 3
5 Test1b1a 4
CREATE TRIGGER Update_ID
ON TableA INSTEAD OF UPDATE
AS
IF UPDATE(ID)
BEGIN
DECLARE @old_ID INT
DECLARE @new_ID INT
SELECT @old_ID = ID FROM DELETED
SELECT @new_ID = ID FROM INSERTED
UPDATE TableA
SET ID = @new_ID
WHERE ID = @old_ID
UPDATE TableA
SET RefID = @new_ID
WHERE RefID = @old_ID
END
SPROC:
UPDATE TableA
SET ID=6
WHERE ID=2
RefID is the FK to ID
ID is also the PK to another table and has the relationship use cascading Delete and Update.
Problem:
"The UPDATE statement conflicted with the SAME TABLE REFERENCE constraint"
This is referring to the first UPDATE of the Trigger.
It was my understanding that Instead Of checks the constraints after it is all done yet it errs with the first Trigger UPDATE.
I was expecting to overcome the self-reference constraint issue by using Instead Of and with the first Trigger UPDATE, change the ID(PK) and then change the RefID(FK) with the second Trigger UPDATE.
Once that was done, it should have not had any constraint problems. Thoughts?
Thanks, Nathan