Nothing happens and i dont know where to troubleshoot, if i check both queues they are empty ? I have altered the queues so that retention is ON.
I have checked the sql log of both instances and nothing.
When i execute the above sql it executes succesfully, so basically i am stuck i can execute the dialog sql, and set the activation on the target queue to OFF , so if i message gets there it should stay in the queue, but both que's are empty and no errors ? Not sure where to even start checking the issue ? For all i know the contract could be incorrect or port 4022 blocked or the endpoints not working, but i dont know where to find these errors other than the sql log and it has no errors ?
I'm working with the April CTP of SQL Server and I'm trying to create a proof of concept using service broker. I'm struggling with the "abc's" of it. If anyone has or can point me to a distributed "Hello, World" for service broker between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Express instances it would save me some time and trouble.
We are developing a distributed application based on Tree Network Topology. Any part of this application knows only for one parent part and all children parts. For synchronize data with parts of this application we using SQL Service Broker.
Every part contains database. Lets name it SB?. This database contains one QUEUE for received and sent messages, MESSAGE TYPE, CONTRACT and SERVICE. Any Service on part has unique name. Also there are one REMOTE SERVICE BINDING and ROUTE for parent part (service) and on one fore every child part (service). For each link Source Target we create separate conversation_handle:
"BEGIN DIALOG @ConversationHandle FROM SERVICE [Source] TO SERVICE 'Target' ON CONTRACT Contract WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;"
All works fine, messages sends and received quite well. But if we have opposite messages in one moment, with probability 100 percent one of messages, will be missing. Why it happened? Is duplex is not supported in Service Broker? May we do something wrong? Anybody encounter this problem?
We using flag retention = on for queue, to analyze messages after they processed. Body of Message that sent into several services (in one transaction) absent in that service from which the message during the same moment has been sent.
hi all, i want to create a service broker application between two different instances. can i achieve the dialog security and transport security with out using certificate? like we can achieve the transport security using windows authentication (both the instances are in same domain). so how to achieve the dialog security with out using certificates.
I have been profiler tracing my service broker setup while testing.
Now i have a strange scenario.
I get the following error on Server1 every 65 seconds:
An error occurred while receiving data: '64(The specified network name is no longer available.)'.
Now i am familiar with this error, it normally has to do with my routing.
BUT
Every 10 minutes or so i get the following errors:
An error occurred while receiving data: '10054(An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.)'. 10053(An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.) An error occurred while receiving data: '10053(An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.)
Now i have no ieda where this is coming from, the queue, sys.transmission queue and sys.endversation_endoints are clear, if i trace the initiator and forwarder for this target i get nothing, so basically i have no idea what is causing these errors? I cannot find any active messages or conversations from either side?
I cannot find out what remote host the errors are refering to? I am not sure what to trace for to get more detailed infromation.
Sql Server Log has nothing.
When i do test communications between target and initaitor both ways every seems fine, the messages are recieved, conversations are ended properly the queues, sys_transmission and conversation endpoints all clear 100%.So my routing etc all is 100%.
But these errors keep coming up on server 1. On profiler these errors happen under Broker:connection event, but there is no other info like hostname etc.
This is really irritating because i am profiling testing and i dont know when and error is from what i am testing or this ghost error that keeps happening constantly.
My normal investigation with profiler and sys_transmission_queue and conversation_endpoints gets my no information.
How to prevent the hang on the initator service broker if the target service broker is not started?
Our case has two service brokers (two databases), sometime, the target is need to turn off. But the sitation is the initator service broker (in fact, the message is sent from triggers) become hang, I want to prevent this case and continue to operation, and the messages should queue and will continue to send to target service broker when it startup. How should I do?
Hello, I receive this error "The SQL Server Service Broker for the current database is not enabled, and as a result query notifications are not supported. Please enable the Service Broker for this database if you wish to use notifications." I attach the database in Management Studio to query and enable the broker using the scrip below but to no avail. ALTER DATABASE DataName SET ENABLE_BROKER β''<<------successfulandSELECT is_broker_enabled FROM sys.databases WHERE name = 'Database name' β'''<<-------value is 1 Global.asax ... Sub Application_Start(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDependency.Start(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("dataConnectionString1").ConnectionString) End Sub...Web.config ... <connectionStrings> <add name="dataConnectionString1" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|jbp_data.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> <add name="ASPNETDBConnectionString" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.MDF;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> </connectionStrings>... Hope you could help. cheers,imperialx
I am struggling with the position SSB could take in an SOA. If I would want a broker in the general sense, meaning an intermediary sitting between applications which exchange information through messaging, would SSB be a good candidate? I know Biztalk is probably the primary candidate, but in my scenario I would end up with Biztalk apps with empty orchestrations. Also, I think Biztalk is more expensive to manage. So I am looking for a lightweight broker for a simple SOA targeted at application interoperability, no fancy business processes in sight.
In our current project, we are attempting to use Broker for the middleware for a "queuing" solution that helps in throttling & load-balancing incoming messages. These messages could potentially be either long-running jobs or simply an incoming flood of messages received from our integration web services that are called upon via BizTalk.
For the posting of messages onto the "to do" queue, we are implementing the "fire & forget" pattern that has been discussed here previously and on Remus' blog. This aspect of the design seems to work fine for us. Currently we have this setup where activation is occuring on the target queue, but we don't want to hold open a thread there on the server while waiting for our synchronous calls to various web-services on the processing "farm" to complete.
The next evolution of our design is to try and move activation from off of the primary SQL cluster itself (i.e. activation is currently happening on the clustered SQL boxes) onto the individual processing nodes. For this model, we are looking at using SQL Express on each of the nodes as has been suggested here on the forums for other similar scenarios.
For resiliance to any node failures, we do not want to "route" the messages to the individual nodes hosting their own queues but rather have those nodes do a "read" from the primary queue and do the per-message processing and performing either a committed EndDialog of EndDialogWithError based on the success of processing each task/message.
To invoke the processing on each of the nodes, we need some form of mechanism to send a "wake up" and do the "reads" since no message is being sent to the node itself for any form of activation based on a queue that receives the actual "job". On the same hand, we are considering having a "wake up" queue on the nodes where a simple "wake up" message could be sent to all nodes/queues and then activation on those queues would then invoke the processing "loop" for each node.
My question is how to best establish this "wake up" call to each node. I think I've read about a queue that is internal to Broker itself that receives a message when new items are received in any queue. My initial thought is to put activation on that queue and have a procedure that sends the "wake up" to each of the nodes in our processing farm.
I am looking for any input where others have attempted to solve this type of problem with Broker.
We are doing a POC for transferring a huge number of messages(millions) from oner machine to another. The two approaches we are examining are MSMQ and SQL Broker. The MSMQ is set up as a remote queue on the target machine, and the source machine takes as little as 1 millisecond to send the message (using a .NET program). However, when testing on Service Broker, we find that the time taken to send message to the queue is significantly higher - like 70 millisecond. Could you please help us in understanding why this is happening?
The service broker distributed queues have been set up as per the directions in the posting at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/sindukuri/2797.asp
The source program (written in .NET) is calling a stored procedure in the source machine to write to the SSB queue. When we run SQL Trace, we find that the SP is responsible for 99% of the time taken. Here is our SP that send the message: Declare @ConversationHandle uniqueidentifier Begin Dialog @ConversationHandle From Service SenderService To Service 'ReceiverService' On Contract SampleContract WITH Encryption=off; SEND ON CONVERSATION @ConversationHandle Message Type SenderMessageType (<<XML String>>)
Please let us know if there are any additional settings required in the Service Broker to improve its performance. Or , what are the other approaches for building a distributed SSB application?
I am trying to send a message between to SQL Server 2005 instances on two different machines. I have checked all my routes and all my objects appear to be setup correctly. However, when running Profiler on the target machine, I receive the "This message has been dropped because the TO service could not be found. Service name: "[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]". Message origin: "Transport". This is my activated stored procedure that is sending the message to the target service. I am using certificate security. Any help appreciated....
CREATE PROCEDURE [usp_ProcessMessage]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @conversation_handle uniqueidentifier
DECLARE @message_body AS VARBINARY(MAX)
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
WAITFOR(RECEIVE TOP (1)
@conversation_handle = conversation_handle,
@message_body = message_body
FROM [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyQueue]
), TIMEOUT 1000;
IF (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
BEGIN
COMMIT;
BREAK;
END
END CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
IF @message_body IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
FROM SERVICE [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
ON CONTRACT [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyMessage/v1.0]
WITH ENCRYPTION = ON, LIFETIME = 600;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
MESSAGE TYPE [tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/VisitMessage]
(@message_body);
END
COMMIT;
END
END
GO
My endpoints are created like so:
CREATE ENDPOINT MyEndpoint
STATE = STARTED
AS TCP
(
LISTENER_PORT = 4022
)
FOR SERVICE_BROKER (AUTHENTICATION = CERTIFICATE MasterCertificate)
GO
GRANT CONNECT TO CertOwner
GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::MyEndpoint TO CertOwner
GO
And my routes like so:
GRANT SEND ON SERVICE::[tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService] TO CertOwner
GO
CREATE REMOTE SERVICE BINDING [MyCertificateBinding]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
I am doing some research to see if the Service Broker technology would help my company with our Enterprise application. Here is our scenario: We have a 3 tier system. The first tier needs to contact the second tier asynchronously. Hence, using queues is a good option. However, the process that needs to happen on the second tier is mostly process intensive with little database updates. Is it still worth our time to use Service Broker?
I like the concept of Activation that Service Broker provides. But, from what I am reading most of the documentation describes activation as a way to call another stored proc. I definitely dont' want to do any process intensive work on the SQL server. So here comes my question...
How would I use a windows service to listen to the activation event from the Service Broker. I could have multiple windows services watching the same queue (scalable). Would I have to handle collisions myself? If so, I think I would rather keep it simple, and just use a simple table as my queue.
Hi to all, I want to study Sql server Service broker, have some questions1. What is the use of service broker ?2. Where this will use ? (With example)3. How to enable Service broker? Because i have sql server 2005 version but no folder like service broker.
Im having a hard time understanding everything required to create a simple Service Broker example. Can someone please assist? Source code would be ideal, but if not "do this, do that" would even be helpful.
I am trying to implement service broker. I send a message from my application code to the database to execute a specific stored procedure. How do i return the result set obtained by the execution of the stored procedure to the application.
My service broker seems to be broken... The database was restored from another crashed server but i have tried the
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE::[SPYDERONTHEWEB] TO [SA];
The error i'm getting is
Service Broker needs to access the master key in the database 'SpyderOnTheWeb'. Error code 25. The master key has to exist and th service master key encryption is required.
It will be great to have an update on MS plans to solve the problem of using Service Broker for remote users who sit behind the NAT. Any news will be appreciated.
Hello , I am trying to Implement distribution of the Stock Quotes over the LAN(only within the Network) and showing the live changing stock Quotes on the front end (in datagrid) installed at each clients desktop.I am receiving the Stock prices over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. I am recieving atleast 10-15 messages per second over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. Now i need to distribute this feed to Each connected client.
I tried doing it from TCP / IP , but in vein. Can we install the SQL 2005 Database Client Version on every client and use Service broker instaed of Live TCP / IP connections programmatically?
Ideally Can i dump the meesages from Stock Exchange in to each connected client's database locally and each front end application will keep a record of all the incomming messages.i.e Front end have a notification event , it will referesh the Datagrid in Front end accordingly...
Is it possible to develop Service Broker in .Net 1.1 (VS 2003)? Currently I have a project developed in .Net 1.1 and I want to add a new method utilize the message queue concept (instead of using MSMQ, using Service Broker SQL 2005), although my DB is SQL server 2005.
I am looking at the Service Broker as a way to notify multiple clients that there has been data changed on a table in the shared database. These clients may or may not be online. When there is a change, the notification should fire off a query to refresh the clients local cache. Is this a situation where Service Broker would help me? Can multiple clients recieve the notification at different times ( some recieve while online, some recieve when they come back online)? Any help on this would be appreciated. It seems from what I read that the messages are pulled off the queue when a notification has taken place. Is this correct? If so, can I set it to behave differently?
Let's assume the situation: we have Initiator and Target. Target is behind ISP's NAT and can't be published outside. So, when Initiator sends a message to Target, Target will not be able to establish a backward connection and will not send an acknowledge. Initiator will retry and retry...
I have tried the following, each runs successfully with no error, but nothing is in the queues, what can be the issue? CREATE MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType VALIDATION = WELL_FORMED_XML;
CREATE CONTRACT MQContract (SentMsgType SENT BY ANY );
CREATE QUEUE SentQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE QUEUE ReceivedQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE SERVICE SentService ON QUEUE SentQueue (MQContract);
CREATE SERVICE ReceivedService ON QUEUE ReceivedQueue (MQContract);
SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[insertTrigger] ON [dbo].[tblBBB] FOR INSERT AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; DECLARE @handle uniqueidentifier DECLARE @msgBody nvarchar(500)
select @msgBody = someString from inserted
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @handle FROM SERVICE SentService TO SERVICE 'ReceivedService', 'CURRENT DATABASE' ON CONTRACT MQContract;
--Sends a message SEND ON CONVERSATION @handle MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType ('<message>' + @msgBody + '</message>') END CONVERSATION @handle WITH CLEANUP; END
SELECT * FROM SentQueue SELECT * FROM ReceivedQueue;
Can anyone let meknow how do i enable a service broker. I am trying to enable a service broker for an issuetracker application to get change of events in my database. When ever i try enabling it using the ALTER DATABASE [ databse] set Enable_Broker. it takes abt more that 2 hrs or more but doesnt show as enabled. Thanks in Advance, Pawan Venugopal
So SQLDependencies failed to do what I wanted them to do for my Cache Invalidating, so i'm going to humor another possibility for a half day - Triggers on my database table that communicate messages to my C# inside my ASP.NET App. Any advice on how to tap into a message queue with C#? I'm thinking that my messages could be 1 of about 100 different strings as far as what occurred on the Database Tables
We have a customer whos database just grows and grows. Not the customers own tables, but the:
sys.sysconvgroup sys.sysdesend sys.sysdercv
And these tables are linked to the Service Broker, and according to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179503.aspx these tables exists in every database and are used by the Service Broker.
Now to my questions =)
HOW do I delete rows from these tables? How come these tables hust grows and grows, could it be any setting in the SQL 2005 Server or is it the customer who has programmed his application wrong?
I'm in the process of doing the initial research for the architecture of a large scale, transactional messages routing platform.
My initial design called for a series of MSMQ queues and Windows Services, written in C#, to process the messages in these queues. There will be incoming and outgoing queues, queues to store unroutable messages, etc.
My application will be routing many hundreds of thousands (and eventually millions) of messages per day. These message are very small (< 200 bytes each) and must be routed very quickly. (<1 second processing overhead per message for high priority messages.)
Using the term "routing" may be a bit misleading. The messages arrive via TCP socket connections. I will just need to take in a message, examine its intended destination, and send it to one of several outgoing socket connections, likely on different machines. Some messages require higher priority routing than others, but I don't need multi-hop routing or anything like that.
Of great concern to me is that there are absolutely no single points of failure in the system. Because of this I was considering using a combination of MSMQ and Windows Services in a Clustered environment.
Can the Service Broker provide me with this kind of functionality? If so, how well does it perform and scale? Is it a better choice for messaging applications that require high transactional throughput than MSMQ?
I'm just trying to get an idea of what products/services I should look into further.
i'm new with service broker and need to develop mail site to send mass email and decide to use sevice broker i'm make aqueue ,sevice and all function for run service borker and creat databasie mail profile
then test it but it's don't work please help me to fine what's the problem ?
thanks very mcuh for every one read my request and response to me thanks very mcuh
I am new to service broker and would like a little help please. I have a SP which gathers information from a collection of tables. Depending on the data gathered it may or may not begin a dialog conversation with a service broker queue. What i'm needing to know is should at the end of the SP once the required message has been sent should i end the conversation or not?
Hi, in the development env. I created the 2 dbs used by service brokers, the service brokers objects (messages, queues etc...).
The schema applied to tables and Activation SP is [dbo] and also the queues are executed as [dbo].
Everything works fine!Cool!
Now that we have to deploy evertything on production I would like that the service broker conversation runs using a specif user ( in this way when I log the Service Broker's errot in the event log I see this specific user and not my name)
Which kind of permission I have to give to this the user .. it is enought that I assign to it the schema DBO or I have to change the definition of my queues( execute as '[dbo]') or to create a new schema?
