Does anyone know who I can truncate the transaction log of a database that
is on a linked server?
TRUNCATE LOG [linked server].[dbo].[database] WITH TRUNCATE_ONLY
does not work.
Thanks,
Kell
SQL7:
I have a 300MB db, and a transaction log near 1.3GB. Upon notification, I backed up the db log with truncate_only - no luck getting it smaller. Later, tried backup with no_log ( assuming the o/s was full - no diff)
I tried shinkfile (logfile,truncateonly) and no luck.
I tried dbcc opentrans to see if any pending trans. The db looks fine with dbcc checkdb. I managed to free up a mere 50MB. I checked the permissions on the db, and added backup db, and backup log in the db permissions for the user logged in (also tried this with sa)
I am unable to free up the space to the os. Can I somehow rid the log file and start off with a fresh log file? I need this space. As a patch I moved the log to a larger filesystem as a temporarily fix.
start/stop SQL- nothing? reboot -nothing? I played with waiting game. This log does not want to release space. The log grew from data loads.
Question1: Suggestions how to truncate this log? The contents are not really impt, but the space is.
Question2: Can I add another logfile, then use EMPTYFILE to transfer the contents to the newly added log file, then REMOVE The original logfile? In theory does this make sense?
Thanks,
Jason
This is a silly question but I am not sure of the answer.
Each day I do a complete DB backup and houly I backup the Translog file with the append mode.
Question Is the Transaction log truncated each time I do a Transaction Log Backup?
To commit a transaction on SQL server A database A that also inserts a record to SQl Server B database B (this is a linked sql server) do I need the xact_abort set on before the commit trans statement. Or is doing this not possible
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to connect to another slq server db through a linked server (and synonyms) but I get the following error.
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The current transaction cannot be committed and cannot support operations that write to the log file. Roll back the transaction. ,Unable to start a nested transaction for OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "BURT". A nested transaction was required because the XACT_ABORT option was set to OFF. , at Westfalia.TDMN.TxObjects.TxBurtOCIInterface.BurtOCIPalletChangedRecords_Get() , --- End of inner exception stack
I've set up MSDTC and executed the procedures noted in MS's article ID 873160. I am using 2005, but the Burt server is 2000. I can run the stored procedure from my server, which queries theirs. But when I execute the sp from a service, I get the error. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Can one use Truncate Table on a linked server table? When I try it, I get amessage that only two prefixes are allowed. Here's what I'm using:Truncate Table svrname.dbname.dbo.tablename
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have my SQL7 server running on NT4 server. Currently the transaction log backups are on the same server but I want to back these up to a Win2000
server in another building. When creating a Backup Device in Enterprise Manager on the NT server it cannot see the drive but not the folder I have created on the Win2000 server, even though I have shared this folder out and set the permissions. Any help would be appreciated.. Thanks
With a database size of almost 2 GB, I run the 'truncate table eventlog command' which completes successfully, but the database size only decreases by about 10 MB so stays too large - indeed the number of rows in the eventlog table is minimal, but the otehr tables in this database don't show such an amount of tables large enough to cause the size issue either. What could be the reason and how can I reduce it (possibly truncating another table but then which one, how could I determine which is too large and needs truncating?).
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi ,
On my Desktop i registered Production Server in Enterprise Manager
on that Server if i go to SecurityLinked Servers
There is another Server is already mapped, when i am trying to see the Tables under that one of the
Linked Server i am getting the Error message saying that
"Error 17 SQL Server does not exist or access denied"
if i went to Production Server location and if i try to see the tables i am able to see properly, no problems
why i am not able to see from my Desk top
i am using the sa user while mapping the Production Server on my DESKTOP using (ENTERPRISE MANAGER)
And i check the Client Network Utility in the Alias using Named Pipe only, i changed to TCP/IP still same problem
What might the Problem how can i see the Tables in Linked Server from my DESKTOP
Thanks
I am using Linked Server in SQL Server 2008R2 connecting to a couple of Linked Servers.
I was able to connect Linked Servers, but I cannot point to a specific database in a Linked Server, also, I cannot rename Linked Server's name.
How to point the linked server to a specific database? How to rename the Linked Server?
The following is the code that I am using right now:
USE [master]
GO
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedserver
   @server = N'Machine123Instance456',
   @srvproduct=N'SQL Server' ;
GO
EXEC sp_addlinkedsrvlogin 'Machine123Instance456', 'false', NULL, 'username', 'password'Â Â
Is there a way to bypass the syntax checking when adding a stored procedure via a script?
I have a script that has a LINKed server reference (see below) .
INSERT
INTO ACTDMSLINKED.ACTDMS.DBO.COILS ..etc.
ACTDMSLINKED does not exist at the time I need to add the stored procedure that references it.
PLEASE to not tell me to add the LINK and then run the script. This is not an option in this scenerio.
Thanks,
Terry
Hi all...
Please forgive the elementary nature of my question, but could someone please explain the differences between these two database backup types:
1. Log backup
2. Log backup no truncate
From what I understand and have read, the "no truncate" backup method keeps the entire transaction log indefinitely. Using the truncation method, the transaction log is either 1) compressed or 2) cleaned up so that any completed transactions are removed from the log. Which one of these is true?
And, for the big question: is it better to run a backup of the transaction log with truncation or not? Our current backup scheme is similar to the following:
Full backup every 24 hours
transaction log backup every hour with no truncation
Should we insert a truncation backup somewhere in here? What is the danger of removing (or compressing) parts of the transaction log? Will this affect the restore process?
Thanks in advance!
friend can i ask something like this
what query that can i truncate the transaction logs or shrink it into
2mb.
Please response to this. I need help
Thanks
Hi all,If I set recovery model SIMPLE then truncation of log files will beautomated , but I will losedatabase changes made since the last backup was taken.Is there any way to automate truncation of log file andbackup of database upto last change has been done????Plz Help.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi All,
I am new to SQL Server. I have a table which is paritioned by Value (String). Can I write a stored procedure or an SQL Statment to truncate a particular partition in SQL Server. Please suggest me on this.
Thanks
Chow
I have an issue with Delete statement.In the code given below (its a part of actual proc),if we use TRUNCATE to clean the temp tables, everything goes fine.But if I use DELETE in place of truncate, system skips the IF loop 'if (@script_type = 1 OR @script_type = 2)'I am not able to understand this behavioral difference between DELETE and TRUNCATE.Recently the database is being used for replication, but that should not be a reason.
SELECT @max_rows = COUNT('X') FROM #temp_table1
SET@row_cnt = 1
WHILE @row_cnt <= @max_rows
BEGIN
[code],...
I wnat to have a log file with all the updates and inserts made to the DB.
I understand I have to do a trans-log,how?
in order to make a query a transaction do I only have to declare trans...commit ??
tanx,
eyal
I would like to know what happens if i shrink the database with truncate only option and do a full backup or transaction log backup ? are the full backup or transaction log backup valid? I know that the performance of the database is bad if i shrink the database. What happens to full backup or transaction log backups?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe are using SQL Server 2005 (SP1). I have created a maintenance plan that backs up up the datebase every night. The problem is that the transaction log is continuing to grow. I have been told that a full backup will automatically truncate and shrink the transaction log. However, this is not happening. How can I truncate and shrink the transaction log after a full backup as part of our maintenance plan. Thank you.
View 29 Replies View RelatedHello all - I have a SQL Server 2000 database setup using the Full Recovery Model. Each night, we backup the entire database, and as such would like to truncate the log at this time as well.
Is the best way to do this to also backup the Transaction Log, and then perform a DBCC SHRINKFILE command? It just seems like there should be an easier way...?
Thanks!
I have set up a simple trans rep from a server in the office to the web. both servers are NT4sp6aSQL 7.0. Tables only.
The publication and distribution db are on the server at the office, and there is a full time connection through the firewall.
The initialization and first replication works perfectly, but after that, there is a message from the snapshot agent that "no subscriptions needed initialization", the logreader says thare are no replicated transactions and the Distribution agent says there are no replicated transactions. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance
Does anyone know how to move the transaction log(s) of a LIVE database to a new location. I must move the log of a database to a new mirrored drive without any disruption to users. I cannot take the database offline or use the sp_detach_db stored procedure. Your inputs are much appreciated!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello, During an intantanée arrest of replication of data base sql server 7 sp2 (nt4),
I lose keys on the subscriber, how don't have it? Thank you in advance easter
pascal
:confused:
Here's my situation (SQL2K)
We have a testing database we're using to convert large amounts of data from 1 system to another. We might process 5-6 million records, but don't care about being able to recover point-in-time.
I set recovery mode to simple, do a full backup every night. I keep getting large transaction logs. I manually run Shrink Database when I realize the logs are big
What can I do to prevent the logs from getting big in the first place ?? Can I prevent logging from happening ?
I keep reading various books and BOL, but I guess I don't quite "get it" yet ......
Any plain spoken, detailed suggestions would be very appreciated .... thanks in advance.
My database backs up just fine, but the transaction logs
are not. I created a maintenance plan for the database.
Any suggestions ?
Agent Job for transaction log backup
EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_sqlmaint N'-PlanID 0A83F1BC-EEAA-
4BDF-9374-E7FF5C1215F8 -
Rpt "d:sqldataMSSQL$PRODUCTIONLOGzeon_live_commerce DB
Maintenance Plan16.txt" -DelTxtRpt 1WEEKS -VrfyBackup -
BkUpMedia DISK -BkUpLog -UseDefDir -DelBkUps 2DAYS -
CrBkSubDir -BkExt "TRN"'
The error log file for the transaction log backups is...
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged
on to SQL Server 'ZCHQ_SQLPRODUCTION' as 'ZCISQLSERVICE'
(trusted)
Starting maintenance plan 'zeon_live_commerce DB
Maintenance Plan1' on 6/12/2002 8:15:03 AM
Backup can not be performed on
database 'zeon_live_commerce'. This sub task is ignored.
Deleting old text reports... 1 file(s) deleted.
End of maintenance plan 'zeon_live_commerce DB Maintenance
Plan1' on 6/12/2002 8:15:03 AM
SQLMAINT.EXE Process Exit Code: 1 (Failed)
If you are set up for AutoCommit why would you or should you set a explicit transaction? I have noticed that in some called stored procudures from a "container" stored procedure. (Hope I got that right) that in the called stored procedure a Begin tran is used. Can anyone help with the why and what fors? It seems to me that you want to let SQL Server handle this becuase of the danger of leaving out a Commit or Rollback? But thats me. I may be very wrong? Thanks.
Tom
Hi,
I was just wondering, if I have a DB for log shipping, and change the recovery model to bulk-insert before I do a dbreindex, does the log still grow as big as the full recovery model? as in when the DB in bulk-insert model, will dbreindex still writes to the log? What i'm trying to do is try to make the log files smaller for log ship when i'm doing the db reindexing job.
Thanks.
I’m really scratching my head with this Transact-SQL, say you wanted to cycle through a set of rows, then perform an operation on each row, so in VB/DAO it might look like this:
Dim rsTables As Recordset, rsIndex As Recordset
Set rsTables = dbSource.OpenRecordset("SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.tables")
Do While rsTables.EOF
Set rsIndex = dbSource.OpenRecordset("Select * From SysIndexes Where Name = '" & rsTables!Table_Name & "'")
DoSomethingToIndex rsIndex!Name
rsTables.MoveNext
Loop
How can you do this cycling with Trans-SQL?
I have a basic load proc (loading a staging area.) that truncates a target table just before inserting fresh data in said table, all wrapped in a distributed transaction. What happens (only with certain tables and very inconsistently.) is the truncate will fail (no error) and duplicate data ends up in the target table since no wipe actually occurs. This proc only started having this issue when we went from SQL 2008 to SQL 2014.
View 9 Replies View RelatedHi
We used to used Sql Server 2000 DTS to perform daily backups to remote servers very successfully but just cannot do the same with SSIS.
I set my Transfer Sql Transfer Objects Task to use the following settings:
CopyData = true
ObjectsTocopy = All Tables
As soon as it hits a table that has a foreign key, I get the following error:
"Truncate data failed for Table nnn"
I've tried setting DropObjectsFirst = True but this fails too with foreign key violations.
First of all, am I doing something obviously wrong? Is SSIS not smart enough to drop tables in the right order so that we don't get foreign key violations?
Am I totally barking up the wrong tree with this and can anyone suggest a better way of doing remote backups?
Kind regards
Ben
I want to truncate my sharepoint config database and WSS_Logging database logs the size of sharepoint_config database is growing at a pace of ~10GB every week. I have scheduled a weekly full backup. Current .ldf file size is 113GB.
I am using SQL server 2012 with Always On High Availability feature. I am not able to set the recovery mode from Full to Simple as it gives me message that mirroring is running on both server.
In my case to reduce the log file what I need to do.
Hi all,
Just wondering if the virtual filesize of the transaction log can be changed to suite us.
run dbcc loginfo(sagent_dev) display the followings:
FileId FileSize StartOffset FSeqNo Status Parity
213041664 8192 2110128
213041664 130498561960128
213041664 26091520197064
2524288039133184201064
2524288065404928204064
2524288070647808203064
25242880102105088210064
25242880107347968000
25242880112590848214264
25242880117833728213064
25242880123076608212064
Note that the virtual filesize can comprise of different configuration. In other database I can specify this logical size to whatever I like.
cheers
dave
We would like to replicate from a SQL 7 DB some data onto a SQL 2000 Server running SQL 2000. We plan to take some data off the SQL 7 DB's and create a Data Warehouse on the SQL 2000 Box.
Question: Will the data replicate successfully from the SQL 7 box onto the SQL 2000 box?
-thanks
-tom