Is it possible to combine the following tables:
Table1:
id
1
2
3
Table2:
licenses
3
2
1
To one table, like this:
id licenses
1 3
2 2
3 1
-There is always the same number of rows in both tables.
Thanks a lot!
I have got the following union statement:
SELECT plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr,
FROM plan2008
GROUP BY plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr
UNION
SELECT fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
FROM fsp_auftrag
GROUP BY fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
My problem is that each table contains additional values like art_amount, art_turnover etc... whereby the first table contains plan values while the second table contains actual values.
My goal is to get plan as well as the actual values in one row, how is that possible? If I put the values into each of the selects I get two rows, which is not the wished output.
Is it possible to join the tables after the union took place?
Thanks in advance!
I have an interesting problem to report that I'm hoping someone will be able to assist in solving.
I have a report that contains a table inside of a list. When I view this report on my local machine via Visual Studio, everything appears normal, the columns are all the correct size. However, as soon as I publish this report to the report server and attempt to view it via Report Manager, one of the columns expands horizontally!
From all of the documentation I have read, I understand that Reporting Services does not provide the ability for columns to expand horizontally, only vertically. Can anyone help explain why this is happening or a possible solution to turn this automatic expanding off?
Many thanks,
canuck81
I am trying to get a consolidated sum of all the columns of the two tables that I am Using the UNION on. I can not get the sum function to work or the group by.
SELECT T2.State,t2.Taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', (T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM inv1 t1 inner JOIN oinv t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
UNION ALL
SELECT t2.state,t2.taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then -(T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
-T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM RIN1 t1 inner JOIN ORIN t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
order by T2.STATE
Hi,
I have three tables named as BroadCastetails,PaymetMaster,MemberMaster.
I have two query as mentioned below--
SELECT MemberMaster.FirstName, MemberMaster.LastName, BroadCastDetails.BroadCastName FROM BroadCastDetails INNER JOIN MemberMaster ON 5 = MemberMaster.MemberID AND BroadcastCreationDateTime between '01/01/2007' AND '12/12/2007'
SELECT BroadCastDetails.ScheduledStartDateTime, BroadCastDetails.TotalCalls FROM BroadCastDetails UNION SELECT PaymentTransaction.TransactionDate, PaymentTransaction.CallsToCredit FROM PaymentTransaction
I want the result of the above two query in a GridView.How can I do that ? Its urgent...
Hi,
I have an Orders Table and a Freeshipping Table.
ORDERS
======
CustomerId OrderDate Quantity
========== ========= ========
1000 01/01/2003 5
1000 01/04/2003 9
1000 01/08/2003 14
2000 01/01/2003 4
1000 06/03/2003 9
4000 05/02/2003 4
FREESHIPPING
=============
CustomerID FreeDate
========== ========
1000 01/01/2003
1000 01/03/2003
How can I write a query that will return the following result to show the order details for customerid 1000
for a date range between 01/01/2003 and 01/08/2003
OrderDate Quantity FreeShipping
========= ======== ============
01/01/2003 5 Y
01/03/2003 0 Y
01/04/2003 9 N
01/08/2003 14 N
Note that even if an order was not placed and the date was a freeshipping date, it is still displayed in the resultset
Thanks in advance,
-ron
I have 2 Tables one called Reps and the other called STORES
I need to use a UNION statement but my Server is saying that the "UNION" is ERROR The Query Designer does not support the UNION SQL construct.
What command would I use to put these 2 tables together?
HELP!
I have 2 temporary tables from a previous operation, Tab1 and Tab2, with the same dimensions. How do I create a third table Tab3 with the same dimensions containing the the combined rows of the 2 previous tables? TIA!
Tab1
Col1 Col2 Col3
A1 B1 C1
A2 B2 C2
Tab2
Col1 Col2 Col3
X1 Y1 Z1
X2 Y2 Z2
X3 Y3 Z3
After the required sql operation I should have
Tab3
Col1 Col2 Col3
A1 B1 C1
A2 B2 C2
X1 Y1 Z1
X2 Y2 Z2
X3 Y3 Z3
Hi there, I have some identical tables that I want to query for a search Is there anyway I can execute the unions first then a where command on all the tables at once I have tried using go but it doesn't seem to work, so I put the where statemtents at the end of each union for now. Here's my code:
strSQL = "SELECT * FROM england WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM ni WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM wales WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM scotland WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%'"
This query works perfectly and orders by just as I need
Code:
Select
'1st' As [Type],
#Uno.ID
#Uno.Address,
#Uno.shippingInfo
FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
However, when I use it in a Union All so I can pull data from 2 diff tables, the order by statement no longer works. How can I order by data in 2 tables?
Code:
Select
'1st' As [Type],
#Uno.ID
#Uno.Address,
#Uno.shippingInfo
FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
I try to build some query on hierarchy data and after two days thinking about it i have null result. What I need is union more trees tables by root id to one table.
-- tree
-- this query is functional: OK
WITH tree (sid, parend_id, level) as
(
SELECT sid, parend_id, 0 as level
[Code] ....
But this query work with one root id (100); what can i do when i have more roots id ? -> generate each tree table separated by roots id and then all tables join to one (union).
Hello,
I'm using SQL2005, SP2
I have multiple temp tables with the same column structure that I would combine into into a single temp table using Unions.
Is this possible?
Example:
Select * From #temp1
Union All
Select * From #temp2
Union All
Select * From #temp3
Into #Temp4
I thought I would ask while I continue to research this in case someone came back with the solution before I was able to track it down elsewhere.
Thanks!
What is the standard way to union tables with exactly the same schema that are in different databases?
For example:
Code Block
USE db1 SELECT * FROM table1
UNION
USE db2 SELECT * FROM table2
this will return the following error:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 3
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'use'.
I have 2 tables
tblOpenSiteDates
Site: int
OpenDate: smalldate
Comment: VarChar
tblCloseSiteDates
Site: int
CloseDate: smalldate
Comments: VarChar
newLocationID: int
I am trying to get a view which would display a site with the open and close dates. Null is ok for a close date for those opens that are still open.. not every office has an open date and close date.. it is possible to have just a close date and not an open date (ie unsure of open date but I know its closing)
so the output would be
viewOpenCloseSites
Site: int
opendate: smalldate
closedate: smalldate
PLEASE HELP i just can not figure it out
thanks...
I have two tables with data that I need to get and display in a combobox. What I want to do is have the parent table listed in the combobox with all of its children indented. Sorted by parent then by child.
This SQL seems to be more complex than I have done previously
I can get all of the records from both tables easily:
Code:
SELECT strName, ID FROM tblParents as pp
INNER JOIN tblChildren as cc
ON cc.pID = pp.uiGUID
UNION (SELECT strName FROM tblChildren as c
INNER JOIN tblParents as p
ON c.pID = p.ID)
However, this simply returns a list that is not ordered in any fashion. I'd like to have all of the parent's children shown under the parent name (there is only 1 parent per child and multiple children per parent)
Hi!
I'm trying to get the results from three different tables, where they have some of the same results. I'm only interested in where they match and then trying to order by date (that's in three columns - M, D, Y). I read previous post in 9/07 but the result doesn't seem to order correctly. It does not have any rhyme or reason to the outputed results as it bounces back and forth through Oct, Nov and Dec posting and throughout all three tables. Here's my query below. Any ideas how I can get my ordering correct for all three tables to display all Oct, all Nov and all Dec?
Thanks so much
select date3, date2, date1, who, what
from
(
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shows
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shares
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from soiree
)
a order by date3, date2, date1
HI, Guys:
I've some AT_DATE tables (eg: AT_20080401, AT_20080402, ...) in SQLServer DB, and these AT_XX table have same columns. but table count could be variant, so I have to query sysobjects to get all of these tables. like this:
select name from sysobject where name like 'AT_%'
Now I try to create a view AT which is the union of all these AT_XX tables, such as:
Code Snippet
Create View AT as
select * from AT_20080401
union
select * from AT_20080402
union ...
but since I'm not sure how many tables there, it would be impossible to write SQL as above.
though I could get this union result via stored-procedure, view couldn't be created on the resultset of a procedure.
Create View AT as
select * from AT_createView() <-- AT_createView must be a function, not procedure
I've checked msdn, there is Multi-statement table-valued function, but this function type seems to create one temporary table, I don't want to involve much of insert operation because there could be more than 1million records totally in these AT_XX tables.
So is there any way to achived my goal?
any reference would be appreciated, thanks !
I'm trying to summarize costs assigned to active jobs for a manufacturing business. I need to aggregate work in process (WIP) cost that resides in labor-transaction and part-transaction tables based on transaction types, and transaction dates. Some transactions increase the WIP cost of the job while others decrease WIP. The business needs to see how much $$ is tied up in each job as of a particular date -- the calculation is:
ToDate (cost of materials and labor assigned to job)
- ToInv (cost of materials returned to inventory)
- ToSales (cost of materials sold).
I developed this query incrementally and, so far, the #ToDate, #ToInv, and #ToSales temp tables seem to be populating with the correct data. My thought was to combine these three tables with a UNION and then extract the grand totals and here's where I started getting the following error:
------------------------------------------
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'.
------------------------------------------
The problem is with the UNIONs going into #myTotal.
I would appreciate any help with this. Also, please let me know if you can suggest a better design for this. Thanks!
Below is a simplified version of my query:
--#ToDate
CREATE TABLE #ToDate (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2)
INSERT INTO #ToDate (JobNum, Cost)
--M&S To Date
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS Cost
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN ( <valid trans types> )
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
UNION -- This one works ok.
--L&B To Date
SELECT jh.JobNum,
sum(l.LaborRate*l.LaborHrs) + sum(l.BurdenRate*l.BurdenHrs) AS Cost
FROM LaborDtl l
JOIN JobHead jh ON l.JobNum = jh.JobNum
WHERE jh.JobReleased = 1
AND l.PayrollDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY jh.JobNum
--#ToInv
CREATE TABLE #ToInv (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2)
INSERT INTO #ToInv (JobNum, Cost)
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
--#ToSales
CREATE TABLE #ToSales (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2))
INSERT INTO #ToSales (JobNum, Cost)
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
--#myTotal
CREATE TABLE #myTotal (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2), Source varchar(9))
INSERT INTO #myTotal (JobNum, Cost, Source)
SELECT d.JobNum, SUM(d.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToDate d GROUP BY d.JobNum ORDER BY d.JobNum
UNION -- Problem**********************
SELECT i.JobNum, SUM(-1*i.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToInv i GROUP BY i.JobNum ORDER BY i.JobNum
UNION -- Problem**********************
SELECT s.JobNum, SUM(-1*s.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToSales s GROUP BY s.JobNum ORDER BY s.JobNum
--Select grand total for each job
SELECT JobNum, SUM(Cost) FROM #myTotal ORDER BY JobNum
--Drop temp tables
DROP TABLE #ToDate
DROP TABLE #ToInv
DROP TABLE #ToSales
DROP TABLE #myTotal
Currently I have a standard query with a join to several tables. There are two additional tables MAS_CTB and MAS_STB. I would like to do a union between those two tables to get FIELDVALUE which will exist in either the CTB table or the STB table and then have that value be returned with the results of the original query.
I can of course write a UNION from the main query to the CTB and then to the STB table, however it's about 80 dummy fields I would have to replicate in the union which is why I was wondering if there was a more simple way.
Main Query:
SELECT Field1, Field2...Field80
From Table1
Join Table2
Union Portion:
Select FieldValue <------
From MAS_CTB
UNION
Select FieldValue <-----Return to main query above
From MAS_STB
SQL Server 2008 r2...
I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).
Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.
Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...
Query below [for reference]...
WITH cte AS (
SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum
FROM[UT_Pole] A
LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]
[Code] .....
Is there a way to attach a single record to a Select expression without another table?
Here's my case: I am developing a Select query for a report. The report has to show a row for each month, but not all months are necessarily represented in the data, so the result is a report with some of the months missing. Can't have that. To "force" the appearance of all months, I'd like to UNION my Select query to "dummy" records for each month with zeros in the data fields, or something like that. But I'd like to avoid creating a table just to hold the months for the Union. Is there a way to attach records to the result of a Select without those records coming from a table? I'd like to be able to say something like this:
"Do this SELECT. Now, append a row with the following values..."
Thanks!
Is there a way to display my querry horizontally?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn sql server, multiple instances of data default to a row display or vertical. I need a set of data in sql2005 to view horizontally so I can us it in a crystal report. Here is my issue.
gift.HonorKey, gift.HonorName, gift.HonorId
1211 Smith 1222
1244 Owens 4155
I need for the data to read like this:
HonorKey1, HonorKey2, HonorName1, HonorName2, HonorId1, Honorid2
1211 1244 Smith Owens 1222 4155
the table name is gift_view
I would like to be able to create a view in sql analyzer, then save as an SQL View
My direct email is jackfam@comcast.net
What am I missing?
I have three tables "UNIONED" and I want the this inserted into a table.
INSERT INTO mytable (A, B, C, D, E)
SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM
(SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS1 UNION SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS2)
UNION
(SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM a_lot_of_parts)
GROUP BY A,B,C,D,E
This part alone works just like I want it:
(SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS1 UNION SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS2)
UNION
(SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM a_lot_of_parts)
I just want it inserted inte stated columns in my table.
I've stared so much at this I'm "homeblind", ie I can't see the forest because of all the trees...
I have a table where the ID column is a forign key as shown below:
select * from Joel_Table
IDID_Value
1One
2Two
3Three
1Four
2Five
3Six
1Seven
2Eight
3Nine
1Ten
Now, I order the result set based on the ID column:
select ID, ID_Value from Joel_Table
group by ID, ID_Value
order by ID, ID_Value
IDID_Value
1Four
1One
1Seven
1Ten
2Eight
2Five
2Two
3Nine
3Six
3Three
I want though to order the result set as one ID per row:
ID ID_Value ID_Value ID_Value ID_Value
1 Four One SevenTen
2 Eight Five Two
3 Nine Six Three
What is the best way of accomplishing this task?
Thank you much in advance -
I would like for each of the queries to have all of the selected fields shown horizontally in one table.
For example,
Commercial Created | Commercial Closed | Commercial UserId | Residential Created | Residential Closed | Residential UserId | Other Created | Other Closed | Other UserId.
Here is what I have now and it is displaying the fields as I would like them to. In the code below, each Views is acting as an individual table and then joined together to make another table when the query is executed.
WITH t1 AS (
SELECT vSalesReportProcessDetail.[RequestId]
,vSalesReportProcessDetail.Process
,vSalesReportProcessDetail.Entered
,vSalesReportProcessDetail.Closed
/*ROW_NUMBER() over (ORDER BY vSalesReportProcessDetail.[RequestId]) rn*/
FROM[Sales].[dbo].[vSalesReportProcessDetail]
WHERE Process = 'Commercial' ),
[code]....
My project is to automate testing of Stored Proceduresof type SELECT (at least for now).I want to create a table where each stored procedure'sinput parameter values are entered and in another tablethe expected result value(s) are entered when executedagainst a sample database containing manually enteredand verified data.My current problem is that the stored procedures' inputparameters range from none to 50 parameters (ok nowthat I think of it maybe this SP with 50 parameters is anINSERT SP; regardless let's assume I have SPs thatrequire 10-20-30+ parameters).My other problem is each stored procedures' returnedresult could fall into any of these four categories:- 1 row, 1 column- 1 row, many columns- many rows, 1 column- many rows, many columnsSo far I thought about 3 ways of storing the data:1- 1 large table with 50 columns that can hold variousnumber of input parameter values. Similar type of table forholding the output result for the four categories above.2- 1 small table holding one value per row. All kinds of joinswith other tables to indicate which SP and which column thevalue belongs to...3- 1 individual table per stored procedure, this way the numberof columns in the table would match exactly the number of inputparameters.Obviously the above 3 categories could apply both for the inputand output data.Now I'm still in research mode and I haven't decided on any choiceyet. And I know each approach has serious consequences; let's justsay they are all with some limitations.Has anyone dealt with this scenario before? This is the first time Ineed a table to hold various types of returned data.Just to give some numbers: possibly a few thousand SPs and verylikely each SP would have more than one test scenario.What would you suggest?Thank you
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to merge cells within several columns depending on the row number?
e.g.
colA colB colC colD
1 x a b c
2 y -------------------------
3 z -------------------------
for row # 2, #3, colB colC colD are merged.
sample results: <MRNID=10002><VesselCode=VSL1>
wherein MRNID and VesselCode are primary keys of the table.
I want to create a table with a union. Which I have already accomplished. I want to specify the Primary Key in the statement.
Or would I have to use another statement. How would I do that? With an update and what would the syntax be?
Thanks before hand,
itarin
This may be a dumb question, but I can't seem to get the syntax right. I have two temp tables that have the same columns, I want to do a union on them and store the results in a temp table. Any ideas?
Ie.
select * from #tmpTable1
union
select * from #tmpTable2
into #tmpTable3
Thanks!!!
Right now, a client of mine has a T-SQL statement that does thefollowing:1) Create a temp table.2) Populate temp table with data from one table using an INSERTstatement.3) Populate temp table with data from another table using an INSERTstatement.4) SELECT from temp table.Would it be more efficient to simply SELECT from table1 then UNIONtable 2? The simply wants to see the result set and does not need tore-SELECT from the temp table.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to append rows horizontally - I'm using the "xml path" approach
SELECT
E.[USER_NAME] As 'User Name',
(
SELECT ',' + C.[PERMISSION_NAME]
FOR XML PATH('')
) As [Associated Groups]
FROM TABLEA As A
JOIN TABLEB AS B ON A.PK_OBJ_ID = B.FK_APP_OBJECT_REF
JOIN TABLEC AS C ON C.PK_PERMISSION_ID = B.FK_PERMISSION_REF
JOIN TABLED AS D ON D.FK_PERMISSION_REF = C.PK_PERMISSION_ID
JOIN TABLEE AS E ON E.PK_PERSONNEL_ID = D.FK_PERSONNEL_REF
WHERE A.[OBJECT_NAME] = 'MyObjectName'
It's not working. I'm getting:
User nameAssociated Groups
A. SmithG1
A. SmithG2
A. SmithG3
etc...
What I'm looking for is:
User NameAssociated Groups
A. SmithG1, G2, G3
etc...