I am trying to get a consolidated sum of all the columns of the two tables that I am Using the UNION on. I can not get the sum function to work or the group by.
SELECT T2.State,t2.Taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', (T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM inv1 t1 inner JOIN oinv t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
UNION ALL
SELECT t2.state,t2.taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then -(T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
-T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM RIN1 t1 inner JOIN ORIN t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
order by T2.STATE
Hi, I have three tables named as BroadCastetails,PaymetMaster,MemberMaster. I have two query as mentioned below-- SELECT MemberMaster.FirstName, MemberMaster.LastName, BroadCastDetails.BroadCastName FROM BroadCastDetails INNER JOIN MemberMaster ON 5 = MemberMaster.MemberID AND BroadcastCreationDateTime between '01/01/2007' AND '12/12/2007' SELECT BroadCastDetails.ScheduledStartDateTime, BroadCastDetails.TotalCalls FROM BroadCastDetails UNION SELECT PaymentTransaction.TransactionDate, PaymentTransaction.CallsToCredit FROM PaymentTransaction
I want the result of the above two query in a GridView.How can I do that ? Its urgent...
How can I write a query that will return the following result to show the order details for customerid 1000 for a date range between 01/01/2003 and 01/08/2003
OrderDate Quantity FreeShipping ========= ======== ============ 01/01/2003 5 Y 01/03/2003 0 Y 01/04/2003 9 N 01/08/2003 14 N
Note that even if an order was not placed and the date was a freeshipping date, it is still displayed in the resultset
I have 2 Tables one called Reps and the other called STORES I need to use a UNION statement but my Server is saying that the "UNION" is ERROR The Query Designer does not support the UNION SQL construct.
What command would I use to put these 2 tables together? HELP!
I have 2 temporary tables from a previous operation, Tab1 and Tab2, with the same dimensions. How do I create a third table Tab3 with the same dimensions containing the the combined rows of the 2 previous tables? TIA!
Hi there, I have some identical tables that I want to query for a search Is there anyway I can execute the unions first then a where command on all the tables at once I have tried using go but it doesn't seem to work, so I put the where statemtents at the end of each union for now. Here's my code:
strSQL = "SELECT * FROM england WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM ni WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM wales WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM scotland WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%'"
This query works perfectly and orders by just as I need
Code: Select '1st' As [Type], #Uno.ID #Uno.Address, #Uno.shippingInfo FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
However, when I use it in a Union All so I can pull data from 2 diff tables, the order by statement no longer works. How can I order by data in 2 tables?
Code: Select '1st' As [Type], #Uno.ID #Uno.Address, #Uno.shippingInfo FROM #Uno
I try to build some query on hierarchy data and after two days thinking about it i have null result. What I need is union more trees tables by root id to one table.
-- tree -- this query is functional: OK WITH tree (sid, parend_id, level) as ( SELECT sid, parend_id, 0 as level
[Code] ....
But this query work with one root id (100); what can i do when i have more roots id ? -> generate each tree table separated by roots id and then all tables join to one (union).
tblOpenSiteDates Site: int OpenDate: smalldate Comment: VarChar
tblCloseSiteDates Site: int CloseDate: smalldate Comments: VarChar newLocationID: int
I am trying to get a view which would display a site with the open and close dates. Null is ok for a close date for those opens that are still open.. not every office has an open date and close date.. it is possible to have just a close date and not an open date (ie unsure of open date but I know its closing)
so the output would be
viewOpenCloseSites Site: int opendate: smalldate closedate: smalldate
I have two tables with data that I need to get and display in a combobox. What I want to do is have the parent table listed in the combobox with all of its children indented. Sorted by parent then by child.
This SQL seems to be more complex than I have done previously
I can get all of the records from both tables easily:
Code: SELECT strName, ID FROM tblParents as pp INNER JOIN tblChildren as cc ON cc.pID = pp.uiGUID UNION (SELECT strName FROM tblChildren as c INNER JOIN tblParents as p ON c.pID = p.ID)
However, this simply returns a list that is not ordered in any fashion. I'd like to have all of the parent's children shown under the parent name (there is only 1 parent per child and multiple children per parent)
I'm trying to get the results from three different tables, where they have some of the same results. I'm only interested in where they match and then trying to order by date (that's in three columns - M, D, Y). I read previous post in 9/07 but the result doesn't seem to order correctly. It does not have any rhyme or reason to the outputed results as it bounces back and forth through Oct, Nov and Dec posting and throughout all three tables. Here's my query below. Any ideas how I can get my ordering correct for all three tables to display all Oct, all Nov and all Dec?
Thanks so much
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from ( select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shows union select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shares union select date3, date2, date1, who, what from soiree ) a order by date3, date2, date1
SELECT plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr, FROM plan2008 GROUP BY plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr
UNION
SELECT fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr FROM fsp_auftrag GROUP BY fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
My problem is that each table contains additional values like art_amount, art_turnover etc... whereby the first table contains plan values while the second table contains actual values.
My goal is to get plan as well as the actual values in one row, how is that possible? If I put the values into each of the selects I get two rows, which is not the wished output.
Is it possible to join the tables after the union took place?
I've some AT_DATE tables (eg: AT_20080401, AT_20080402, ...) in SQLServer DB, and these AT_XX table have same columns. but table count could be variant, so I have to query sysobjects to get all of these tables. like this: select name from sysobject where name like 'AT_%'
Now I try to create a view AT which is the union of all these AT_XX tables, such as:
Code Snippet
Create View AT as select * from AT_20080401 union select * from AT_20080402 union ...
but since I'm not sure how many tables there, it would be impossible to write SQL as above. though I could get this union result via stored-procedure, view couldn't be created on the resultset of a procedure. Create View AT as select * from AT_createView() <-- AT_createView must be a function, not procedure
I've checked msdn, there is Multi-statement table-valued function, but this function type seems to create one temporary table, I don't want to involve much of insert operation because there could be more than 1million records totally in these AT_XX tables.
So is there any way to achived my goal? any reference would be appreciated, thanks !
I'm trying to summarize costs assigned to active jobs for a manufacturing business. I need to aggregate work in process (WIP) cost that resides in labor-transaction and part-transaction tables based on transaction types, and transaction dates. Some transactions increase the WIP cost of the job while others decrease WIP. The business needs to see how much $$ is tied up in each job as of a particular date -- the calculation is: ToDate (cost of materials and labor assigned to job) - ToInv (cost of materials returned to inventory) - ToSales (cost of materials sold).
I developed this query incrementally and, so far, the #ToDate, #ToInv, and #ToSales temp tables seem to be populating with the correct data. My thought was to combine these three tables with a UNION and then extract the grand totals and here's where I started getting the following error: ------------------------------------------ Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'. ------------------------------------------ The problem is with the UNIONs going into #myTotal.
I would appreciate any help with this. Also, please let me know if you can suggest a better design for this. Thanks!
--M&S To Date SELECT pt.jobnum, SUM(pt.extcost) AS Cost FROM parttran pt JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum WHERE trantype IN ( <valid trans types> ) AND jh.JobReleased = 1 AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30' GROUP BY pt.jobnum
UNION -- This one works ok.
--L&B To Date SELECT jh.JobNum, sum(l.LaborRate*l.LaborHrs) + sum(l.BurdenRate*l.BurdenHrs) AS Cost FROM LaborDtl l JOIN JobHead jh ON l.JobNum = jh.JobNum WHERE jh.JobReleased = 1 AND l.PayrollDate < '2007-9-30' GROUP BY jh.JobNum
SELECT pt.jobnum, SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv FROM parttran pt JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>) AND jh.JobReleased = 1 AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30' GROUP BY pt.jobnum
SELECT pt.jobnum, SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv FROM parttran pt JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>) AND jh.JobReleased = 1 AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30' GROUP BY pt.jobnum
Currently I have a standard query with a join to several tables. There are two additional tables MAS_CTB and MAS_STB. I would like to do a union between those two tables to get FIELDVALUE which will exist in either the CTB table or the STB table and then have that value be returned with the results of the original query.
I can of course write a UNION from the main query to the CTB and then to the STB table, however it's about 80 dummy fields I would have to replicate in the union which is why I was wondering if there was a more simple way.
Main Query: SELECT Field1, Field2...Field80 From Table1 Join Table2
Union Portion: Select FieldValue <------ From MAS_CTB UNION Select FieldValue <-----Return to main query above From MAS_STB
I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).
Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.
Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...
Query below [for reference]...
WITH cte AS ( SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum FROM[UT_Pole] A LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]
I have a Union All transformation with 4 inputs and one output when I debug the package the sum of the different inputs rows does not match the row count in output.
I don't understand, I've used the Union All transform many times and I've never seen this.
I just found out that I can do an ORDER BY clause on entire records set retrieve from a query that combines several sub queries with UNION from different tables with the same structure... so this is great to know, BTW, is this a new feature of MSSQL 2K ? I don't recall being able to do this in MSSQL 7 or 6.5.
Anyway, the main question is, can I use the TOP command in a query that has UNION in it?? Meaning, there are two queries (or more) from two tables (or more) and I need to fetch the top 10 records by an ORDER BY clause from the combined results, when I try to add each sub query TOP 10 the results are not correct at all, when I try to add TOP 10 only to the first query hoping that the analyzer will refer to the whole query, it's selecting TOP 10 from the first query and combines it with all the records from the others...
So, can anyone help? I hope the problem is understood.
I am trying to join to different queries into one table ( I accomplished this)
Next I need to ADD or SUM the results of 2 rows to form a single row.
As you can see in the query below, I run 2 separate queries and use ' ' as a place holder for the UNION to work. I get duplicate rows, one with a value and the other with a '0'. I want to have a single row.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
(SELECT v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name', v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site', Count(ProdID0) as '# copies installed', '' as '# legitimate copies installed'
FROM v_R_System SYS, v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN, v_gs_SupportedPackages inner join v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID
WHERE SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId AND SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId AND v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60)
(SELECT v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name', v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site', '' as '# copies installed', Count(ProdID0) as '# legitimate copies installed'
FROM v_R_System SYS, v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN, v_gs_SupportedPackages inner join v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID
WHERE SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId AND SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId AND v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60) AND DateDiff(Day,HWSCAN.LastHWScan,GetDate()) <= '20'
By default, the UNION operator removes duplicate rows from the result set. If you use ALL, all rows are included in the results and duplicates are not removed.
Why is it assumed that one would want the duplicates removed by default? Isn't that what SELECT DISINCT is for?
I was wondering if there is a way I could write this query as one query using union instead of 3 different queries?
SELECT columna as column,count(ID) as Applications FROM tablea GROUP columna
SELECT columna as column2, count(ID) as Approved FROM tablesa where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and in 'Approved') GROUP BY columna
SELECT columna as column3, count(ID) as Booked, sum(AMT) as amt, sum(AMT)/count(ID) as lavg from tablea where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and STATUS in('book') group by columna
I am doing a UNION of 8 views(with 3 million rows in each view approx). I am sure that there is NO DUPLICATE data between the views. SO specifying a UNION ALL would be better than specifying a UNION in this case?
Thanks!
Prakash.P The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources!
Hi All I want to do the following report and I want the 2nd select statement to appear at the bottom to display the totals
SELECT Item,B.Mar, B.Apr, B.May, B.Jun,B.Jul, B.Aug, B.Sep, B.Oct, B.Nov, B.Dec, B.Jan FROM fncWineSales(2007) AS A UNION SELECT 'Total',SUM(B.Mar), SUM(B.Apr), SUM(B.May), SUM(B.Jun),SUM(B.Jul), SUM(B.Aug), SUM(B.Sep), SUM(B.Oct), SUM(B.Nov), SUM(B.Dec), SUM(B.Jan) FROM dbo.fncWineSales (2007) AS B
Hello,Bear with me (not had much sleep last night), pls see following ddl,dml and comments for what is desired, I don't have a problem gettingdesired result(s), however, I'm wondering if there's another (better)solution than UNION operator in this case. TIA.-- DDLCREATE TABLE #TMP (col varchar(10));-- DMLinsert into #TMPvalues('A124');insert into #TMPvalues('A127');insert into #TMPvalues('A12728');insert into #TMPvalues('A17282');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('CDSS');insert into #TMPvalues('DS');insert into #TMPvalues('YUUEI');-- goal: get one row with col data starting with 'A' and distict rowsfor the restselect top 1 colfrom #TMPwhere col LIKE 'A%'UNIONselect distinct colfrom #TMPwhere col NOT LIKE 'A%'
