UNION Without Table?

Feb 6, 2008

Is there a way to attach a single record to a Select expression without another table?

Here's my case: I am developing a Select query for a report. The report has to show a row for each month, but not all months are necessarily represented in the data, so the result is a report with some of the months missing. Can't have that. To "force" the appearance of all months, I'd like to UNION my Select query to "dummy" records for each month with zeros in the data fields, or something like that. But I'd like to avoid creating a table just to hold the months for the Union. Is there a way to attach records to the result of a Select without those records coming from a table? I'd like to be able to say something like this:

"Do this SELECT. Now, append a row with the following values..."

Thanks!

View 3 Replies

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Using Union ALL Or Union Kills Performance On Stored Proc

Jun 12, 2014

SQL Server 2008 r2...

I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).

Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.

Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...

Query below [for reference]...

WITH cte AS (
SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum
FROM[UT_Pole] A
LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]

[Code] .....

View 4 Replies View Related

Select From UNION Into Table

Sep 21, 2005

What am I missing?

I have three tables "UNIONED" and I want the this inserted into a table.

INSERT INTO mytable (A, B, C, D, E)
SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM
(SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS1 UNION SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS2)
UNION
(SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM a_lot_of_parts)
GROUP BY A,B,C,D,E

This part alone works just like I want it:

(SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS1 UNION SELECT * FROM temp_PARTS2)
UNION
(SELECT A, B, C, D, E
FROM a_lot_of_parts)

I just want it inserted inte stated columns in my table.

I've stared so much at this I'm "homeblind", ie I can't see the forest because of all the trees...

View 7 Replies View Related

Create A Table With A Union And Specify Primary Key

Jul 7, 2004

I want to create a table with a union. Which I have already accomplished. I want to specify the Primary Key in the statement.

Or would I have to use another statement. How would I do that? With an update and what would the syntax be?

Thanks before hand,

itarin

View 1 Replies View Related

Results Of Union Into Temp Table

Apr 3, 2008

This may be a dumb question, but I can't seem to get the syntax right. I have two temp tables that have the same columns, I want to do a union on them and store the results in a temp table. Any ideas?

Ie.

select * from #tmpTable1
union
select * from #tmpTable2
into #tmpTable3

Thanks!!!

View 4 Replies View Related

Temp Table Vs. Union: Which Has Better Performance?

Aug 13, 2007

Right now, a client of mine has a T-SQL statement that does thefollowing:1) Create a temp table.2) Populate temp table with data from one table using an INSERTstatement.3) Populate temp table with data from another table using an INSERTstatement.4) SELECT from temp table.Would it be more efficient to simply SELECT from table1 then UNIONtable 2? The simply wants to see the result set and does not need tore-SELECT from the temp table.

View 1 Replies View Related

UNION 2 Tables Horizontally, To One Table

Aug 5, 2007

Is it possible to combine the following tables:

Table1:
id
1
2
3

Table2:
licenses
3
2
1

To one table, like this:

id licenses
1 3
2 2
3 1

-There is always the same number of rows in both tables.

Thanks a lot!

View 9 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Create Union View To Display Current Values From Table A And All Historical Values From Table B

May 6, 2014

I have 2 identical tables one contains current settings, the other contains all historical settings.I could create a union view to display the current values from table A and all historical values from table B, butthat would also require a Variable to hold the tblid for both select statements.

Q. Can this be done with one joined or conditional select statement?

DECLARE @tblid int = 501
SELECT 1,2,3,4,'CurrentSetting'
FROM TableA ta
WHERE tblid = @tblid
UNION
SELECT 1,2,3,4,'PreviosSetting'
FROM Tableb tb
WHERE tblid = @tblid

View 9 Replies View Related

How Does Union/union All Work Inside SQL Server?

Apr 29, 2008

Why the sequence different?

select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union all select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

---------

--1 G

--2 R

--4 Z

--3 Z

select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

----------

--1 G

--2 R

--3 Z--changed

--4 Z

View 3 Replies View Related

Insert Into Table, Query && Union Question...

Apr 17, 2007

i am do the following:
insert into table_a
([field1a], [field2a], [field3a])
select field1b, field2b, field3b from tableb
where datefield1b >= {variable datefield1} and datefield1b <= {variable datefield2}
which is working.
HOWEVER, i need to add/include 1 more record from tableb.
My first inclination is to do a UPDATE to add that first record BUT i am wondering if there is a way to do a UNION to get that record?
i need the next 1 RECORD that has a datefield1b value that is < {variable datefield1}
so if my date range is 01/01/2007 thru 12/31/2007 i need to also include the previous 1 record from tableb that is < 01/01/2007. that date could be from 1 month to 24 months old. I don't want all those records because there could be a whole lot of them in there.

View 2 Replies View Related

Returning In Table Called Order Using UNION

Apr 23, 2008

Hello again,

I am using UNION to return these 2 tables:

TableA
QID Q
1 Name?
2 Age?
3 Phone?

TableB
QID Q
1 DogName?
2 CatName?

When I use the following query;
SELECT * FROM TableA UNION SELECT * FROM TableB

I get the following return:
QID Q
1 whateverquestions
1
2
2
3

but I wish it to return in order of table invoke:
QID
1
2
3
1
2

Is that possible? (by not changing QID)

Cheers,

James

View 2 Replies View Related

Can I Make A Temp Table With A Union All Select?

Mar 26, 2008

I'm having trouble creating a temp table out of a select statement that uses multipe union alls.

Here's what I have, I'm trying to get the results of this query into a temp table...

select
parent,
(select cst_id from co_customer (nolock) where cst_key = Parent) as cst_id,
(select cst_name_cp from co_customer (nolock) where cst_key = Parent) as cst_name_cp,
(select org_total_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = parent) as Parent_Total_assets,
sum(own_assets) as Total_child_own_assets

from
(
Select parent,
Child,
(select org_own_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = child) as Own_assets

from
(Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,1) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,1) is not null
union all

Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,2) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,2) is not null
union all

Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,3) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,3) is not null
union all

Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,4) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,4) is not null
union all

Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,5) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,5) is not null
union all

Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,6) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,6) is not null
union all
Select Cst_key as Child,
dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,7) as Parent
from co_customer (nolock)
where cst_type = 'Organization'
and cst_delete_flag = 0
and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,7) is not null )as c
) as d

group by parent

having sum(own_assets) <> (select org_total_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = parent)

View 8 Replies View Related

Union Select Of Two Tables And Join Of Another Table Afterwards

Apr 2, 2008

I have got the following union statement:

SELECT plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr,
FROM plan2008
GROUP BY plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr

UNION

SELECT fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
FROM fsp_auftrag
GROUP BY fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr

My problem is that each table contains additional values like art_amount, art_turnover etc... whereby the first table contains plan values while the second table contains actual values.

My goal is to get plan as well as the actual values in one row, how is that possible? If I put the values into each of the selects I get two rows, which is not the wished output.

Is it possible to join the tables after the union took place?

Thanks in advance!

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: UNION ALL In View With Temp Table

May 8, 2015

I have a performance issue with one of the views when I join the view with a temp table

I have 2 Views - View1 and View2.

There is a third view - view_UNION where the

view_UNION =
SELECT * FROM View1
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM View2

If I have a query like -

Select view_UNION.* FROM
view_UNION INNER JOIN #TMP ON #TMP.ID = view_UNION.ID

the execution is too slow.

But if I execute the views separately, I get good performance.

How to improve the performance of the view_Union

View 7 Replies View Related

Avoid Table Scan Using Multi Union View

May 26, 2008

Anyone see a way to trick the optimizer into not scanning all tables involved in the view?

-- create two test tables
create table dbo.test1
(testID int, TestName varchar(10))

create table dbo.test2
(testID int, TestName varchar(10))

-- populate
declare @i int
set @i = 1000
while @i > 0
begin
insert into dbo.test1
select @i, '1.' + cast(@i as varchar(5))
set @i = @i - 1
end

insert into dbo.test2
select 1, '2.1' union all
select 2, '2.2'
go

-- create view
create view dbo.vw_Test
as
select1 as QueryID,
TestName
fromdbo.Test1
union all
select2 as QueryID,
TestName
fromdbo.Test2;
go

-- this works as i want, only scans table dbo.Test2
select *
fromdbo.vw_Test
whereQueryId = 2

-- joining to a table triggers scan of both tables in view:
declare @table table (QueryID int)
insert into @table
select 2;

selectvt.TestName
fromdbo.vw_Test vt
join@table t on
vt.QueryID = t.QueryID

Using the showplan I can see why the optimizer ends up scanning all tables, but maybe there is a way to force it to use the QueryID param evaluation earlier in the filtering.

Nathan Skerl

View 6 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Confirmation Of UNION ALL Query For INSERT INTO Temp Table

Jul 21, 2015

I have the following UNION ALL query with SELECT INTO @tblData temp table. I would like to confirm if my query is correct.

In my first SELECT statement, I have INSERT INTO @tblData.

Do I need another INSERT INTO @tblData again in my second SELECT statement after UNION ALL?

DECLARE @BeginDate as Datetime
DECLARE @EndDate as Datetime
SET @BeginDate = '7/1/2015'
SET @EndDate = '7/13/2015'
DECLARE @tblData table

[Code] ....

View 3 Replies View Related

Group / Union Statement - Pull Unique Records From A Large Table

Sep 22, 2014

I am trying to use SQL to pull unique records from a large table. The table consists of people with in and out dates. Some people have duplicate entries with the same IN and OUT dates, others have duplicate IN dates but sometimes are missing an OUT date, and some don’t have an IN date but have an OUT date.

What I need to do is pull a report of all Unique Names with Unique IN and OUT dates (and not pull duplicate IN and OUT dates based on the Name).

I have tried 2 statements:

#1:
SELECT DISTINCT tblTable1.Name, tblTable1.INDate
FROM tblTable1
WHERE (((tblTable1.Priority)="high") AND ((tblTable1.ReportDate)>#12/27/2013#))
GROUP BY tblTable1.Name, tblTable1.INDate
ORDER BY tblTable1.Name;

#2:
SELECT DISTINCT tblTable1.Name, tblTable1.INDate
FROM tblTable1
WHERE (((tblTable1.Priority)="high") AND ((tblTable1.ReportDate)>#12/27/2013#))
UNION SELECT DISTINCT tblTable1.Name, tblTable1.INDate
FROM tblTable1
WHERE (((tblTable1.Priority)="high") AND ((tblTable1.ReportDate)>#12/27/2013#));

Both of these work great… until I the OUT date. Once it starts to pull the outdate, it also pulls all those who have a duplicate IN date but the OUT date is missing.

Example:

NameINOUT
John Smith1/1/20141/2/2014
John Smith1/1/2014(blank)

I am very new to SQL and I am pretty sure I am missing something very simple… Is there a statement that can filter to ensure no duplicates appear on the query?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: UNION Vs PIVOT For De-flattening SOME Columns Of A Partially Flat Table

Jan 23, 2015

We have a table with 500+ columns. The data is non-normalized, i.e. there are four groups of fields for for "people", followed by data that applies to all people in the row (a "household").For ad-hoc queries, and because I wanted to index columns within each person (person 1's age, person 2's age, etc.), I used UNION:

SELECT P1Firstname AS FirstName, P1LastName as LastName, P1birthday AS birthday, HouseholdIncome, HouseholdNumber of Children, <other "household" columns>
UNION
SELECT P2Firstname AS FirstName, P2LastName as LastName, P2birthday AS birthday, HouseholdIncome, HouseholdNumber of Children, <other "household" columns>

I could get at least the P1... P2... P3... columns with PIVOT, but then I believe I'd have to JOIN back to the row anyway for the "household" columns. Performance of UNION good, but another person here chose to use PIVOT instead.I can' find any articles on PIVOT vs. UNION for "de-flattening".

View 2 Replies View Related

Union All Does Not Union All Rows

Nov 6, 2006

Hi all,

I have a Union All transformation with 4 inputs and one output when I debug the package the sum of the different inputs rows does not match the row count in output.

I don't understand, I've used the Union All transform many times and I've never seen this.

Any idea why this could happen ?

View 18 Replies View Related

How To Create A Make-Table Query With A Union Query

Oct 30, 2006

I have successfully execute a union query. How can i create a make-table query to accomodate the resultset of the union query?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Loop And Query CSV Files In Folder Using Union All Query To Form Resultant Table On Server?

Jun 27, 2014

I am trying to run a UNION ALL query in SQL SERVER 2014 on multiple large CSV files - the result of which i want to get into a table in SQL Server. below is the query which works in MSAccess but not on SQL Server 2014:

SELECT * INTO tbl_ALLCOMBINED FROM OPENROWSET
(
'Microsoft.JET.OLEDB.4.0' , 'Text;Database=D:DownloadsCSV;HDR=YES',
'SELECT t.*, (substring(t.[week],3,4))*1 as iYEAR,
''SPAIN'' as [sCOUNTRY], ''EURO'' as [sCHAR],

[Code] ....

What i need is:

1] to create the resultant tbl_ALLCOMBINED table

2] transform this table using PIVOT command with following transformation as shown below:

PAGEFIELD: set on Level = 'Item'
COLUMNFIELD: Sale_Week (showing 1 to 52 numbers for columns)
ROWFIELD: sCOUNTRY, sCHAR, CATEGORY, MANUFACTURER, BRAND, DESCRIPTION, EAN (in this order)
DATAFIELD: 'Sale Value with Innovation'

3] Can the transformed form show columnfields >255 columns i.e. if i want to show all KPI values in datafield?

P.S: the CSV's contain the same number of columns and datatype but the columns are >100, so i dont think it will be feasible to use a stored proc to create a table specifying that number of columns.

View 9 Replies View Related

DTS - UNION

Jan 23, 2001

Hi,

I am using DTS to import data where the query involves the UNION .

Select a,z,y from x
UNION
select b,z,y from y;

Only the columns Z,y appearing in the output. Is there any known problem with UNION in DTS?

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Union -- Union All

Dec 3, 2004

Help me again . :) ..
Query :

Select 1 AS ColA, ColB,ColC
FROM Table1
Where ColA = 1
Union
Select 2 AS ColA, ColB,ColC
FROM Table1
Where ColA = 2

Expected Result.
ColA ColB ColC
1 Apple Sweet
1 Wine Alcohol
2 Home Nice
2 Travel Fun

But gives
ColA ColB ColC
1 Apple Sweet
1 Wine Alcohol
1 Home Nice
1 Travel Fun

any suggestions .please reply.

View 1 Replies View Related

Union In MDX

Mar 23, 2007

Could someone explain me Union function in MDX? How is different from the T-SQL Union?

My need is urgent.

View 1 Replies View Related

Union

Jul 12, 2004

i have a table with country names

table name:country
column name:country
it is populated with:
UK
USA
africa
asia
japan

i want a query which gives the foll output
USA
UK
africa
asia
japan

(i.e) USA and UK must be on the top 2 rows
while the rest of the countries should come below these 2 and sorted in the ascending order.

if it is possible with any other query also it is ok

View 1 Replies View Related

Use TOP With UNION

Jul 14, 2004

Hi

I just found out that I can do an ORDER BY clause on entire records set retrieve from a query that combines several sub queries with UNION from different tables with the same structure... so this is great to know, BTW, is this a new feature of MSSQL 2K ? I don't recall being able to do this in MSSQL 7 or 6.5.

Anyway, the main question is, can I use the TOP command in a query that has UNION in it?? Meaning, there are two queries (or more) from two tables (or more) and I need to fetch the top 10 records by an ORDER BY clause from the combined results, when I try to add each sub query TOP 10 the results are not correct at all, when I try to add TOP 10 only to the first query hoping that the analyzer will refer to the whole query, it's selecting TOP 10 from the first query and combines it with all the records from the others...

So, can anyone help? I hope the problem is understood.

Thank you,
Inon.

View 2 Replies View Related

Need Help With UNION And SUM

Nov 8, 2004

Hi!

I am trying to join to different queries into one table ( I accomplished this)

Next I need to ADD or SUM the results of 2 rows to form a single row.

As you can see in the query below, I run 2 separate queries and use ' ' as a place holder for the UNION to work. I get duplicate rows, one with a value and the other with a '0'. I want to have a single row.

Any help is greatly appreciated!

(SELECT
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name',
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site',
Count(ProdID0) as '# copies installed',
'' as '# legitimate copies installed'

FROM
v_R_System SYS,
v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN,
v_gs_SupportedPackages
inner join
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID

WHERE
SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId
AND
SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId
AND
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60)

GROUP BY

v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0,
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 )

UNION

(SELECT
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name',
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site',
'' as '# copies installed',
Count(ProdID0) as '# legitimate copies installed'

FROM
v_R_System SYS,
v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN,
v_gs_SupportedPackages
inner join
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID

WHERE
SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId
AND
SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId
AND
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60)
AND
DateDiff(Day,HWSCAN.LastHWScan,GetDate()) <= '20'

GROUP BY

v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0,
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 )

View 4 Replies View Related

UNION Vs UNION ALL

Dec 15, 2006

Just a pet peeve....

From BOL:

By default, the UNION operator removes duplicate rows from the result set.
If you use ALL, all rows are included in the results and duplicates are not
removed.

Why is it assumed that one would want the duplicates removed by default?
Isn't that what SELECT DISINCT is for?

View 1 Replies View Related

Union

Mar 18, 2004

I was wondering if there is a way I could write this query as one query using union instead of 3 different queries?

SELECT columna as column,count(ID) as Applications
FROM tablea
GROUP columna

SELECT columna as column2, count(ID) as Approved
FROM tablesa where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and in 'Approved')
GROUP BY columna

SELECT columna as column3, count(ID) as Booked, sum(AMT) as amt, sum(AMT)/count(ID) as lavg
from tablea where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and STATUS in('book')
group by columna

View 2 Replies View Related

UNION Vs UNION ALL

Apr 22, 2008

Hi All,

I am doing a UNION of 8 views(with 3 million rows in each view approx). I am sure that there is NO DUPLICATE data between the views. SO specifying a UNION ALL would be better than specifying a UNION in this case?

Thanks!

Prakash.P
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources!

View 8 Replies View Related

Union

Jun 20, 2008

Hi folks,
I have a question about the performance of the following query:

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
)
union

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
) union

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
)

How that query works? Is it slow for a larger data? Does it do 3 queries and then combine them?

Thank you.

View 3 Replies View Related

Union

Feb 11, 2008

Hi All
I want to do the following report and I want the 2nd select statement to appear at the bottom to display the totals

SELECT Item,B.Mar, B.Apr, B.May, B.Jun,B.Jul, B.Aug, B.Sep, B.Oct, B.Nov, B.Dec, B.Jan
FROM fncWineSales(2007) AS A
UNION
SELECT 'Total',SUM(B.Mar), SUM(B.Apr), SUM(B.May), SUM(B.Jun),SUM(B.Jul), SUM(B.Aug), SUM(B.Sep), SUM(B.Oct), SUM(B.Nov), SUM(B.Dec), SUM(B.Jan)
FROM dbo.fncWineSales (2007) AS B

thanx in advance

View 11 Replies View Related

Other Than UNION

Jul 23, 2005

Hello,Bear with me (not had much sleep last night), pls see following ddl,dml and comments for what is desired, I don't have a problem gettingdesired result(s), however, I'm wondering if there's another (better)solution than UNION operator in this case. TIA.-- DDLCREATE TABLE #TMP (col varchar(10));-- DMLinsert into #TMPvalues('A124');insert into #TMPvalues('A127');insert into #TMPvalues('A12728');insert into #TMPvalues('A17282');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('CDSS');insert into #TMPvalues('DS');insert into #TMPvalues('YUUEI');-- goal: get one row with col data starting with 'A' and distict rowsfor the restselect top 1 colfrom #TMPwhere col LIKE 'A%'UNIONselect distinct colfrom #TMPwhere col NOT LIKE 'A%'

View 4 Replies View Related