Hi I'm trying to update a db based on the select statement which has
ORDER BY in it.
And due to that I'm getting error which states that
Server: Msg 1033, Level 15, State 1, Line 13
The ORDER BY clause is invalid in views, inline functions, derived
tables, and subqueries, unless TOP is also specified
Here is my sql statement:
SELECT SUBSTRING(A.DESCR,1,10), B.SUPPORT_TEAM_MBR, EMPLID, COUNT(*)
from PS_TEAM_CODE_TBL A, PS_TEAM_MEMBERS B, PS_MEMBER_PERSON C
WHERE A.SUPPORT_TEAM_CD = B.SUPPORT_TEAM_CD
AND A.EFF_STATUS = 'A'
AND A.EFFDT >= (SELECT MAX(AX.EFFDT) FROM PS_TEAM_CODE_TBL AX
WHERE A.SETID = AX.SETID
AND A.SUPPORT_TEAM_CD = AX.SUPPORT_TEAM_CD)
AND B.SUPPORT_TEAM_MBR = C.SUPPORT_TEAM_MBR
GROUP BY SUBSTRING(A.DESCR,1,10), B.SUPPORT_TEAM_MBR, EMPLID
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
ORDER BY SUBSTRING(A.DESCR,1,10)
Hello,I'm using SS2000 on NT4.If I run the following query, is it garanteed that the field"OldField1Value" will hold the value Field1 had before the query was run?UPDATE MyTableSET Field1 = 42,OldField1Value = Field1.... and in this query?UPDATE MyTableSET OldField1Value = Field1,Field1 = 42
Hi,I was hoping someone could help me with what I'm sure is a very simpleproblem...I just can't seem to find the syntax!I'm wanting to update the rows in 'tbl_consolidate' from 'tbl_hold',but working through the records in 'tbl_hold' in the order of dates ina date field, rather than the order that the rows are necessarily in.I came up with the following code to do this:update tbl_consolidateset field1 = b.field1, field2 = b.field2, field3 = b.field3from(select * from tbl_hold order by datefield1) bwhere tbl_consolidate.ID1 = b.ID1(I originally tried to use an alias 'a' for tbl_consolidate but thisthrew an error)In tbl_consolidate, ID1 is unique, but in tbl_hold there can be manyrecords with the same value in ID1. Using my code, I'd expect theUPDATE to work its way through the records in tbl_hold in order of thedatefield1 column, but it doesn't seem to do it in this order. Cananyone help?
I could write a query with a sub-query in order to perform an UPDATE on the most recent 60,000 records of a table based on a date field, but unfortunately I am receiving an error.
Code: SELECT * FROM DMTM SET transmit_date = '2012-05-07 00:00:00.000', transmit_status = '1223' WHERE temp_pk in
I have a Conditional Split, where there are two outputs.
First output is a dataset which is to be inserted into the database.
Second output is a dataset for which the data already exists in the DB. I just need to update those data.
I have a doubt here. I want the insertion to be done first and then updation. Is there any property to be set for insertion or updation, something that maintains the order of execution or priority of execution.
Please do ask me if you need any further clarification.
I am relatively new to complex queries and need creating a query using a CASE in order to update columns to be either A or B. A few things about this is that I am joining tables from linked servers as well. This is the last part. I execute the query and receive the error:
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'from'.
select (select FirstName from [ZZZXXX].HCM.dbo.tPerson where PersonGUID = tPersonJobHistAlias.SupervisorPersonGUID) as supervisorFirstName, (select LastName from [ZZZXXX].HCM.dbo.tPerson where PersonGUID = tPersonJobHistAlias.SupervisorPersonGUID) as supervisorLastName, (select PersonID from [ZZZXXX].HCM.dbo.tPerson where PersonGUID = tPersonJobHistAlias.SupervisorPersonGUID) as SupervisorEmployeeID,
Scenario: [**tableA**] plus [**tableDim1**] plus [**tableDim2**]. I create a DSW, a cube I deploy the [@@CUBE@@]..so connect the data using an excel file that show the data as [¬¬dashboard¬¬].
It works.
My question is: after three days the [**tableA**] is populated with new rows. In order to allow my colleagues to see the new rows I deploy the [@@CUBE@@] again. My colleagues can see the new rows in the [¬¬dashboard¬¬].
It works, ok. But do I really need to deploy the [@@CUBE@@] every time or it should be update automatically when you, for example, refresh the data in Excel. Do I miss something?
I am creating an app that allows the user to change the order of the list by changing a value in a displayOrder field. I'd love a button for move up /move down move bottom/move top and then pass that parameter to a stored procedure and it would renumber all the items in the list. Example ItemID description DisplayOrder Action0 item 1 0 Moveup/move down1 item 2 1 Moveup/move down2 item 3 2 Moveup/move down So clicking on move up on item 2 would pass and itemID, Action and perhaps a list id to a stored proc and it would renumber the list. I'm assuming it would be done with a loop but I've never tried that.. suggestions? Thanks - Mark
I want to be able to pass an "ORDER BY" parameter into my stored procedure but I am receiving errors when I do. For example:
CREATE PROCEDURE GetFromTable ( @SortOn varchar(20) ) AS SELECT * FROM Table ORDER BY @SortOn GO
This is the error I get: Variables are only allowed when ordering by an expression referencing a column name. Any suggestions on what I can do to make this work?
I have created a SQL Stored Procedure that uses a Case statement todetermine the Order By. For one of the Case statements I am trying toturn a Char field into Datetime in for the Order By, however I can notget it to work. Can someone please take a look and my code below andtell me what I am doing wrong. Thank you.ORDER BYCASE WHEN @SortBy = 'dttm_stamp' THEN dttm_stamp End,CASE WHEN @SortBy = 'Event_Date1' THEN CAST(CONVERT(char(10),Event_Date1,101) as datetime) End,CASE WHEN @SortBy = 'FullName' THEN Emp_lastname + ', ' +Emp_firstname End,CASE WHEN @SortBy = 'FullName Desc' THEN Emp_lastname + ', ' +Emp_firstname End DESC,CASE WHEN @SortBy = 'Emp_SSN' THEN Emp_SSN End
I'm running a simple DBCC DBREINDEX ('myTable') and I receive thefollowing error:"Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 2, Line 2A column has been specified more than once in the order by list.Columns in the order by list must be unique. DBCC executioncompleted. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your systemadministrator."I can successfully reindex other tables in this database. I thoughtthat perhaps I had objects in the database that ended up with the samename, but I've pretty much ruled that out.Any suggestions?ThanksJohn D. Morrismailto://jmorris_42@hotmail.com
I have been trying to get the following Selects to work using a case expression in the order by section.
I know I can easily separate out the two statements but I want to do a select using the case statement below ; however, I keep getting error 16 --"Order by items must appear in the select list if the statement contains a union.
If remove the case statement and put order by "internalID desc" I receive no errors. Moreover, when I take out the union statement and execute the two select statements with each including the case expression it runs as planned.
Can anyone tell what the problem is here? I have combed the web looking for an answer, but it seems that the statement is valid.
Thanks J declare @date set @date = '2001'
select internalID from section_data_v3
union
select internalID from section_data_v4
order by case when (@date = '2001') then internalID end desc
on executing the below query i am getting the following error
ERROR: Errors in the back-end database access module. Nested table keys in a SHAPE query must be sorted in the same order as the parent table. The nested query may be missing an ORDER BY clause.
even though the order by clause is presenet in the nested query
SELECT t.[ProductId], Predict ([Association].[Product Basket],3) From [Association] PREDICTION JOIN SHAPE { OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT DISTINCT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} APPEND ({OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} RELATE [ProductId] To [ProductId] ) AS [Product] AS t ON [Association].[Product Id] = t.[ProductId] AND [Association].[Product Basket].[Product Id] = t.[Product].[ProductId]
Finding the "pieces of information" I need to successfully install the SQL Server Express edition is so complex. Uninstalls do "not" really uninstall completely, leading to failure of SQL install. Can you suggest a thorough, one-stop site for directions for the order of app uninstalls and then the order for app installs for the following...
SQL Server Express edition
Visual Studios 2005
Jet 4.0 newest upgrade
.Net Framework 2.0 (or should I use 3.0)
VS2005 Security upgrade
Anything else I need for just creating a database for my VS2005 Visual Basic project?
I was trying to use MS Access as my backend db but would like to try SQL Express
In SQL sERVER 2008, I have two fields - Depatment and Employees. I need to sort the result set by employee number ascending order, with following exception
1)when department number = 50 - the preferred order is Employee # - 573 followed by 551-572 (employee # belong to Dept 50 = 551-573)
2)When Department number = 20 – the preferred sort order is Employee # 213-220, followed by Employee # 201-213 (employee # belong to Dept 20 = 201-220)
I never paid much attention to this before but I noticed this today in a new table I was creating.
For tables defined in the tabular model the table properties have something like SELECT Blah FROM TableName ORDER BY Blah Then in the tabular model the table's data is in the same order it was ordered by in the data source for the table.
I have a date table I setup and I noticed it is NOT respecting the sort order.
I have it sorted by DateID which sorts with the oldest date first and newest date as last row.However, the table that is imported and stored in the data model is not in that order.
I can of course manually sort the rows in BIDS/DataTools, but I find this discrepancy odd.
Would this have negative impacts on the EARLIER function for example if the data rows are not in the order specified?
INSERT INTO PurchaseOrder (PurchaseOrderDate, SupplierID) VALUES(@date, @SupplierID)
END
SET @POno = @@IDENTITY
RETURN
However, how do i make it that it will automatically adds item under the POno being gernerated? can i use a trigger so that whenever a Insert for PO is success, it automaticallys proceed to adding the items into the table PurcahseOrderItem?
hi basically what i have is 3 text boxes. one for start date, one for end date and one for order id, i also have this bit of SQL SelectCommand="SELECT [Order_ID], [Customer_Id], [Date_ordered], [status] FROM [tbl_order]WHERE (([Date_ordered] >= @Date_ordered OR @Date_ordered IS NULL) AND ([Date_ordered] <= @Date_ordered2 OR @Date_ordered2 IS NULL OR (Order_ID=ISNULL(@OrderID_ID,Order_ID) OR @Order_ID IS NULL))"> but the problem is it does not seem to work! i am not an SQL guru but i cant figure it out, someone help me please! Thanks Jez
Hi, We got a problem. supposing we have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE a ( aId int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, aName string2 NOT NULL ) go ALTER TABLE a ADD CONSTRAINT PK_a PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (aId) go
insert into a values ('bank of abcde'); insert into a values ('bank of abcde'); ... ... (20 times)
select top 5 * from a order by aName Result is: 6Bank of abcde 5Bank of abcde 4Bank of abcde 3Bank of abcde 2Bank of abcde
select top 10 * from a order by aName Result is: 11Bank of abcde 10Bank of abcde 9Bank of abcde 8Bank of abcde 7Bank of abcde 6Bank of abcde 5Bank of abcde 4Bank of abcde 3Bank of abcde 2Bank of abcde
According to this result, user see the first 5 records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 in page 1, but when he tries to view page 2, he still see the records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. This is not correct for users. :eek:
Of course we can add order by aid also, but there are tons of sqls like this, we can't update our application in one shot.
So I ask for your advice here, is there any settings can tell the db use default sort order when the order by column value are the same? Or is there any other solution to resolve this problem in one shot?
Hi,guys!I have a table below:CREATE TABLE rsccategory(categoryid NUMERIC(2) IDENTITY(1,1),categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,PRIMARY KEY(categoryid))Then I do:INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('url')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('document')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('book')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('software')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('casus')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('project')INSERT rsccategory(categoryname) VALUES('disert')Then SELECT * FROM rsccategory in ,I can get a recordeset with the'categoryid' in order(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)But If I change the table definition this way:categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL UNIQUE,The select result is in this order (3,5,7,2,6,4,1),and 'categoryname 'in alphabetic.Q:why the recordset's order is not the same as the first time since'categoryid' is clustered indexed.If I change the table definition again:categoryname VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL UNIQUE CLUSTEREDthe result is the same as the first time.Q:'categoryname' is clustered indexed this time,why isn't in alphabeticorder?I am a newbie in ms-sqlserver,or actually in database,and I do havesought for the answer for some time,but more confused,Thanks for yourkind help in advance!
Hi, We got a problem. supposing we have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE a ( aId int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, aName string2 NOT NULL ) go ALTER TABLE a ADD CONSTRAINT PK_a PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (aId) go
insert into a values ('bank of abcde'); insert into a values ('bank of abcde'); ... ... (20 times)
select top 5 * from a order by aName Result is: 6 Bank of abcde 5 Bank of abcde 4 Bank of abcde 3 Bank of abcde 2 Bank of abcde
select top 10 * from a order by aName Result is: 11 Bank of abcde 10 Bank of abcde 9 Bank of abcde 8 Bank of abcde 7 Bank of abcde 6 Bank of abcde 5 Bank of abcde 4 Bank of abcde 3 Bank of abcde 2 Bank of abcde
According to this result, user see the first 5 records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 in page 1, but when he tries to view page 2, he still see the records with id 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. This is not correct for users. Of course we can add order by aid also, but there are tons of sqls like this, we can't update our application in one shot. So I ask for your advice here, is there any settings can tell the db use default sort order when the order by column value are the same? Or is there any other solution to resolve this problem in one shot?
I have created view by jaoining two table and have order by clause.
The sql generated is as follows
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT dbo.UWYearDetail.*, dbo.UWYearGroup.* FROM dbo.UWYearDetail INNER JOIN dbo.UWYearGroup ON dbo.UWYearDetail.UWYearGroupId = dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYearGroupId ORDER BY dbo.UWYearDetail.PlanVersionId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWFinancialPlanSegmentId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYear, dbo.UWYearGroup.MandDFlag, dbo.UWYearGroup.EarningsMethod, dbo.UWYearGroup.EffectiveMonth
If I run sql the results are displayed in proper order but the view only order by first item in order by clause.
Has somebody experience same thing? How to fix this issue?
insert into test_sort values('Non-A'); insert into test_sort values('Non-O'); insert into test_sort values('Noni'); insert into test_sort values('Nons');
then execute the following selects: select * from test_sort order by cast( 1 as nvarchar(75));
select * from test_sort order by cast( description as nvarchar(75));
I have a DB with items which can have lengths from 0 to 400 meter.In my resultset I want to show the items with length 1-400 meter and then the results with length 0 meterHow to build my SQL?
