URGENT: Insert And Update In A Transaction Is Getting Blocked
Dec 2, 2005Hello,
View 25 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Database Blocked - URGENT!!
Apr 2, 2007Hi guys,
we have a database here and something happened which causes a database block. We tried to run the 'sp_who' 'active' command to see the spid which locked the database, and we found out that some transaction is blocking another transaction. The following is the sample data results from the sp_who 'active'
spid ecid status loginame hostname blk dbname cmd
52 0 sleeping HOSTINGSQLMonitor BLUE2 185 tempdb INSERT
53 0 sleeping sa 10.10.10.106 185 mfgq_live SELECT
56 0 sleeping sa 10.10.10.106 175 mfgq_live UPDATE
57 0 sleeping sa 10.10.10.143 185 mfgq_live SELECT
We killed all spid which casuse the blocking, but they are keep on coming.
Does anybody have any idea on what casuses this problem or a teporary solution for this? Please help.
Thx
SERIALIZABLE TRANSACTION Getting Blocked?
Jun 10, 2004Hi guys,
I have a stored procedure which generates the next sequence number...
it uses SERIALIZABLE Option. procs look something like below..
begin
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION
Sequence generating statement...
COMMIT TRANSACTION
set @NextSequenceValue = @NextSequenceValue
Return @NextSequenceValue
end
For some reason when i call the proc with below parameters to get next sequence number.. its hungs up..
declare @NextSequenceValue int
set @NextSequenceValue = 0
exec spGetNextSequence 19, 'LotSequence', @NextSequenceValue output, Null
select @NextSequenceValue as NextSequenceValue
When i queried sp_who2 it shows that my processid is blocked by some other processid.. and when i do DBCC INPUTBUFFER (blockingprocessid), the query of blocking processid and my nextsequence generation stored proc is not realted at all..
Can you help shed some light on why my nextsequence generating proc is getting hunged...?
help is appericated..
Blocked Transaction Problem
Oct 11, 2006Hello,
I am trying to execute next query, but when doing it, TABLE1 locks and it does not finish.
SERVER2 is a linked server.
BEGIN TRAN
INSERT INTO TABLE1
SELECT * FROM SERVER2.DATABASE2.DBO.TABLE2 WHERE TAB_F1 IS NULL
COMMIT TRAN
I have same configuration in other 2 computers and it works ok.
What is the problem?
Thank you!!
Bulk Insert W/Update (urgent)
Aug 11, 2006[EDIT #2]
Using this query:
Code:
INSERT INTO Users (userName, UserSalt, UserHash1, UserHash2, UT_memberID)
select memberFirstName + '.' + memberLastName + '56' as userName, '{AxxxxxDE-6xx6-4xxD-Bxx9-3xxxx79xxxxE}',
'{4xxxxxx6-8xx5-6xxD-Cxx6-4xxxFxxx1xx9}', '{0xxx8xxE-Cxx4-6xx8-ExxB-Dxxxx4xxx2xC}', members.memberID
From members
Inner Join groupLeaders ON members.memberID = groupLeaders.memberID
SELECT @@Identity AS UserID
How can I modify the portion that is inserting the '56' at the end of each username to do the following:
1) check to see if username already exists in the database (using a query with "LIKE %'")
2) if not, create the username "as-is" or how it should be without the number
3) if already exists, get a count of records matching your search criteria .... now make a new username + + (count + 1).ToString();
Any thoughts... I am struggling to put these two pieces together.
Thanks,
Zoop
[EDIT - original post below this]
I have modified my method to make this a bit easier. I added a memberID field to my [Users] table so that I can update my [Members] table in a difference statement after the insert takes place.
I have the following query, and it completes succesfully in query analyzer (though I haven't actually executed the SP, just testing the syntax...) anyway, here is what I have:
Code:
INSERT INTO Users (userName, UserSalt, UserHash1, UserHash2, UT_memberID)
select memberFirstName + '.' + memberLastName + '56' as userName, '{AxxxxxDE-6xx6-4xxD-Bxx9-3xxxx79xxxxE}',
'{4xxxxxx6-8xx5-6xxD-Cxx6-4xxxFxxx1xx9}', '{0xxx8xxE-Cxx4-6xx8-ExxB-Dxxxx4xxx2xC}', members.memberID
From members
Inner Join groupLeaders ON members.memberID = groupLeaders.memberID
SELECT @@Identity AS UserID
I am hoping this will create a user for all members whose 'memberID' can be found in the groupLeaders table... is this correct?
Also, notice the 56 being appended to the end of each username. I would like this to be a random number generated within a given range... can this be done? any advice?
Thanks,
Zoop
[Original post below - provide more background]
I have three tables involved with this insert/update:
[Members]
-memberID
-memberFirstName
-memberLastName
-UserID
[GroupLeaders]
-groupLeaderID
-memberID
[Users]
-UserID
-Username
-UserSalt
-UserHash1
-UserHash2
I want to insert into the [Users] table the memberFirstName.memberLastName + randomNum into the 'UserName' column from the [Members] table. Also, I want to make all passwords the same, in this case I know the Salt, Hash1, Hash2 I will be using and would like to pass these in for the 'UserHash1' 'UserHash2' fields.
Now, I only want to make this insert where the memberID is in the GroupLeaders table. and Finally, I need to Update my Members table with a UserID where the memberID matches the one used from the groupLeaders table.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I can accomplish this, even if it requires adding a temporary field to one of my tables... here is what I have so far, but am recieving errors and can't quite figure this one out. (btw - I also don't know how to gen the rand num and was using the literal 23 as a placeholder.) Thanks...
Code:
INSERT INTO Users (userName, UserSalt, UserHash1, UserHash2)
select a.memberFirstName + '.' + a.memberLastName + '23' + as userName, '{AA99FCDE-6E06-437D-B9E9-3E3D27955C3E}',
'{7xxxxxx2-4xx6-9xx1-7xx9-4x3xx4Axxx59}', '{0xx8xxE-Cxx4-6xxx-xxxx-Fxx3xxxx3xxF}', b.memberID as newMemID
From members a, groupLeaders b
Where a.memberID = b.memberID
SELECT @@Identity AS UserID
Update Members Set UserID = Ident_Current('Users')
where memberID = newMemID
Any help is appreciated!
Long Blocked Transaction Logging
May 5, 2007 Is there anyone know any feature in SQL server which can detect/log the transaction which has been blocked unusually long? My idea is:
If a transaction has run for over 30 minutes, then log the following information in SQL server log:
1. State of the transaction : Blocked, Running, Sleeping
2. Time happeing
3. Duration
4. Last SQL it run
5. Blocked by which thread and info of the thread : the last SQL it run, the state of the thread.
Possibly it would be run in SQL server agent or SQL profiler has such feature, I am not sure about it. Can anyone suggest? Thanks.
Should Insert, Update And Delete Stored Procs Be Wrapped In Transaction?????
Feb 7, 2008I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert] @CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRYINSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURNEND TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
Should Insert, Update And Delete Stored Procs Be Wrapped In Transaction?????
Feb 7, 2008I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert]
@CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRY
INSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURN
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP
EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).
RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
DTC Select Works - Insert Update Fails Cannot Begin Distributed Transaction
Mar 31, 2015We have a rather large environment and have just a couple of boxes out there that we are getting cannot begin distributed transaction on inserts and updates but works fine on selects. Inserts and updates work fine outside the begin tran / commit so it's definitely DTC
We have checked the configuration on and the source box is set to No authentication required same for destination.
We have: Verified credentials running the service, changed them, same problem. Uninstalled and re-installed MSDTC per Microsoft instructions.
Have run all the tools for checking DTC DTCPing etc and followed those procedures which typically in the past has resolved any DTC issues. Other than swapping out the offending pc for a new one we are at a loss.
SQL Server 2008 :: Find All Transaction (insert / Delete / Update) On A Database For A Day?
May 8, 2015i would like to know it's possible to find all transaction(insert, delete,update) on a database for a day. if yes what can i do.
View 2 Replies View RelatedInsert Statement Blocked
Sep 25, 2006HiShortly, I keep invoices in a table.Occasionally, someone will fire the execution of a stored procedure(SP) that performs several UPDATEs against (potentially) all invoicesOLDER than a date that is supplied to the SP as a parameter.The SP is usually a lengthy process (it takes at least 30 mins).The problem is that SQL server 2000 Dev Edition doesn't allow me toinsert new invoices that are "younger", while the SP is executing.How should I specify to SQL Server that new invoices are "harmless"?Thanks.
View 8 Replies View RelatedTransaction Log URGENT!!!
Jul 22, 2002Hi! i need to clean the transaction log of a local database. I used to do this in SQL server 6.5 with the sentence 'dump transaction {DB} with no_log'. After this ran 'sp_spaceused @updateusage = 'true'' and the problem was corrected. How can i do this in version 7' ? Are the same sentences?
View 1 Replies View Related**Urgent** Transaction Log
Oct 3, 2001For some reason the transaction log backup which occurs every few hours has failed. This means my transaction log in filling up. Is it possible to increase the space allocated for the log whilst the server is in use.
Thanks in advance for help.
Urgent...transaction Log
Feb 7, 2000Hi,
what do I do if the trasaction log is full?????
Bindu
Transaction Log & Replication -- URGENT
Apr 2, 2002Hi All,
I have been asked to take over the maintenance on dB servers that I have not originally 'set up'. The request came as a result of the database log files growing at such a rapid pace its taking up hard drive space. I ran sp_dboption and noticed that the log files are NOT set up to truncate on checkpoint. As in SQL 2000 I wanted to determine if the dB was set up in 'simple' or 'full' recovery mode. It appears they are set up in 'full' recovery mode (which we can modify, since this is not a transactional dB and we rarely if ever have to restore from the transaction log). Hence my question,
Is there anything I need to worry about (regarding replication)if I change the dboption to truncate on checkpoint and set dB in simple recovery mode?
And after I backup the transaction log and try to shrink it will that have any adverse affects? I feel like this is all I need to do but replication is new ground for me, any information regarding it would be greatly appreciated. Also, any advice on how to maintain the transaction logs would be helpful.
Christine
Transaction Count --help Very Urgent!!
Jul 24, 2001Hi,
I would like to capture number of the total transactions made on the server during a day. ie begin tran - commit tran
How can I collect this information?
Is it possible?
Please help.
Urgent Transaction Log Problem
Jul 27, 2000Hi,
I have just migrated the 6.5 SQL Server to 7 and the intial isze of Db growth was unlimited for 7.0 and so was the transaction log
, now the problem is that the trasaction log file has grown to 8GB, i truncated the transaction log and took a complete DB
backup now the log size is 90MB but i was to put restrictions on log growth to max of 1500MB but when i go to properties of Db
and try to change the log size to 1500 it says cannot change it as the size is less than max size, the max size it shows currently is 8GB
i was to re set it to 1.5GB how can i do that i have tried shrinking the file and relasing the space to OS but still the size it show to me
is 8GB.
What shold i do...
Replies will be appreciated
jane
Transaction-Replication----Urgent
Aug 24, 2000Hi,
Every one
I have added new column in my Publication - Article Table ,
Same column I have added in my Subscriber Table ,
I am doing Transaction replication , but now its giving me error
Insert Error - Column Name or Supplied Value doesn't Match,
If any one has any idea please suggest me
Thanks
Nirmal
Urgent....Transaction Log Backup
Feb 7, 2000Hi,
What do I do if transaction log is full ?????
Can I automate the truncation of the transaction log????
Bindu
URGENT-Transaction Log Full
Feb 21, 2001Hi,
I have an urgent problem.
My transaction log is full.What can I do?I can't stop the server.It's on production.
Please suggest.It's urgent.
TIA
HELP-- Execution Dts In Transaction -- URGENT
Feb 6, 2004please I need to know what is required to properly execute a dts with steps joined to transactions in it.
i know MSDTC must be running on server but it must be running in local machine too?
user running dts must be sysadmin? is it required ?
any other requirements needed?
please write down a full list of required items or a BOL reference to look for
Free Some Space Of The Transaction Log .. Urgent Help Please .!!
Apr 11, 2002Hi friends ,
I have a database with around 2 GB space for the data and 5.8 GB for the
transaction log .
Now the problem is i do not have any more space on the system and data files requires more space than 2 G.B to execute some stored procedures .
Is it possible to decrease some space of the transaction log , say from 5.8 GB to 2 GB and allocate it to the data files .
My data and log files are on different drives . I did not find anything related to this topic in the BOL .
Can somebody help me with this problem ? Anthing related to this issue will be of great help to me since i have no expertise in this field .
Thanks and Regards
Christine S.
Distributed Transaction Error - Help Urgent
Nov 2, 2005i have two remote servers connected to each other through the linked servers.
i can run querries or even perform inserts as far as its not inside a transaction
but when i am trying to run distribted transaction but it keeps on returning the same msg.
Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 3
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
i have configured the firewall, made sure the DTC service is started on both and enabled. they both have the same Sp packs, same config.
Transaction Rollback And Database Restore-urgent
Dec 8, 2000Hi,
We have an order posting stored procedure that's been executing for 14 hours now. This procedure has simple update statements but all the tables updated have triggers which update other tables with triggers and so on.
This procedure hasn't commited yet. I have a full database backup from last night and transaction log backup from this morning while it was running. I want to kill this job and restore database from last backup. Only thing I am afraid of is that it will take too long to roll back which I have no estimate of time. Is there any faster way to get rid of all the uncommited transactions? Has anybody rolled back such a massive transaction? Any idea on how long it can take? Can it affect the overall server performance as this is the main production ERP server.
I can see in profiler that this procedure is still running and not hung.
URGENT !!!! Transaction Log Backup Running Longer Time
Dec 26, 2002Hi Guys,
We have a database with 20 gig and with huge transactions. The transaction log backup is scheduled every one hour
from 3.00 AM to 9.00 PM.
We take a full backup in the disk at 9.00 PM and again a full backup in the tape at 2.00 AM
It works fine in the day from 6.00 AM and complete within seconds and the size is approx. 50 to 200 MB.
But the very first transaction log backup at 3.00 AM is running like 3 hrs and the size is approx. 11 gig whick is almost equivalent to the Full backup size. There are some dts packages that are running in the night and as usual reindex, intergrity checks are running and there no large user traffic during night. But I have no idea which the very first transaction log backup in the morning takes longer time and has this bug size. Is there any work around to fix this proble.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Anu
SQL Server 2008 :: Update Null Enabled Field Without Interfering With Rest Of INSERT / UPDATE
Apr 16, 2015If I have a table with 1 or more Nullable fields and I want to make sure that when an INSERT or UPDATE occurs and one or more of these fields are left to NULL either explicitly or implicitly is there I can set these to non-null values without interfering with the INSERT or UPDATE in as far as the other fields in the table?
EXAMPLE:
CREATE TABLE dbo.MYTABLE(
ID NUMERIC(18,0) IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
FirstName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
LastName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
[Code] ....
If an INSERT looks like any of the following what can I do to change the NULL being assigned to DateAdded to a real date, preferable the value of GetDate() at the time of the insert? I've heard of INSTEAD of Triggers but I'm not trying tto over rise the entire INSERT or update just the on (maybe 2) fields that are being left as null or explicitly set to null. The same would apply for any UPDATE where DateModified is not specified or explicitly set to NULL. I would want to change it so that DateModified is not null on any UPDATE.
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
VALUES('John','Smith',NULL)
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName)
VALUES('John','Smith')
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
SELECT FirstName, LastName, NULL
FROM MYOTHERTABLE
Can I Insert/Update Large Text Field To Database Without Bulk Insert?
Nov 14, 2007I have a web form with a text field that needs to take in as much as the user decides to type and insert it into an nvarchar(max) field in the database behind. I've tried using the new .write() method in my update statement, but it cuts off the text after a while. Is there a way to insert/update in SQL 2005 this without resorting to Bulk Insert? It bloats the transaction log and turning the logging off requires a call to sp_dboptions (or a straight-up ALTER DATABASE), which I'd like to avoid if I can.
View 6 Replies View RelatedT-SQL (SS2K8) :: Insert / Update Triggers When Insert Run Via Script
Oct 23, 2014I'm working on inserting data into a table in a database. The table has two separate triggers, one for insert and one for update (I don't like it this way, but that's how it's been for years). When there is a normal insert, done via a program, it looks like the triggers work fine. When I run an insert manually via a script, the first insert trigger will run, but the update trigger will fail. I narrowed down the issue to a root cause.
This root issue is due to both triggers using the same temporary table name. When the second trigger runs, there's an error stating that a few columns don't exist. I went to my test server and test db and changed the update trigger so that the temporary table is different than the insert trigger temporary table, the triggers work fine. The weird thing is that if the temporary table already exists, when the second trigger tries to create the temporary table, I would expect it to fail and say that it already exists.I'm probably just going to update the trigger tonight and change the temporary table name.
Trigger To Update A Table On Insert Or Update
Feb 15, 2008
Hello
I've to write an trigger for the following action
When a entry is done in the table Adoscat79 having in the index field Statut_tiers the valeur 1 and a date in data_cloture for a customer xyz
all the entries in the same table where the no_tiers is the same as the one entered (many entriers) should have those both field updated
statut_tiers to 1
and date_cloture to the same date as entered
the same action has to be done when an update is done and the valeur is set to 1 for the statut_tiers and a date entered in the field date_clture
thank you for your help
I've never done a trigger before
Single Complex INSERT Or INSERT Plus UPDATE
Jul 23, 2005Hello,I am writing a stored procedure that will take data from severaldifferent tables and will combine the data into a single table for ourdata warehouse. It is mostly pretty straightforward stuff, but there isone issue that I am not sure how to handle.The resulting table has a column that is an ugly concatenation fromseveral columns in the source. I didn't design this and I can't huntdown and kill the person who did, so that option is out. Here is asimplified version of what I'm trying to do:CREATE TABLE Source (grp_id INT NOT NULL,mbr_id DECIMAL(18, 0) NOT NULL,birth_date DATETIME NULL,gender_code CHAR(1) NOT NULL,ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL )GOALTER TABLE SourceADD CONSTRAINT PK_SourcePRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (grp_id, mbr_id)GOCREATE TABLE Destination (grp_id INT NOT NULL,mbr_id DECIMAL(18, 0) NOT NULL,birth_date DATETIME NULL,gender_code CHAR(1) NOT NULL,member_ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL,subscriber_ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL )GOALTER TABLE DestinationADD CONSTRAINT PK_DestinationPRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (grp_id, mbr_id)GOThe member_ssn is the ssn for the row being imported. Each member alsohas a subscriber (think of it as a parent-child kind of relationship)where the first 9 characters of the mbr_id (as a zero-padded string)match and the last two are "00". For example, given the followingmbr_id values:1234567890012345678901123456789021111111110022222222200They would have the following subscribers:mbr_id subscriber mbr_id12345678900 1234567890012345678901 1234567890012345678902 1234567890011111111100 1111111110022222222200 22222222200So, for the subscriber_ssn I need to find the subscriber using theabove rule and fill in that ssn.I have a couple of ideas on how I might do this, but I'm wondering ifanyone has tackled a similar situation and how you solved it.The current system does an insert with an additional column for thesubscriber mbr_id then it updates the table using that column to joinback to the source. I could also join the source to itself in the firstplace to fill it in without the extra update, but I'm not sure if theextra complexity of the insert statement would offset any gains fromputting it all into one statement. I plan to test that on Monday.Thanks for any ideas that you might have.-Tom.
View 4 Replies View Related(Urgent) Help Need With Update Statement
Jan 9, 2008Hi,
I want the PlanId in 6 tables and is there is a way i can provide a statement...
Update TableName
SET Plan_NUM = '279-072230'Where
Plan_NUM = '120003'
but i need to provide mulitple plan_NUM??
REgards
Karen
Help With SqlDataAdapter.Update URGENT
Feb 7, 2008 MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@ConsultantName",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@Calls",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@PPC",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@Mth",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@DaysInMonth",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@Coach",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@Center",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@ProductValue",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@ObjectiveValue",SqlDbType.VarChar));
MyCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
MyCommand.CommandTimeout = 360;
try
{
SqlDataAdapter saveCenterCoaches = new SqlDataAdapter(MyCommand);
saveCenterCoaches.InsertCommand = MyCommand;
DataSet updateSet = finalSet.GetChanges(DataRowState.Added);
saveCenterCoaches.Update(updateSet.Tables[0]);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
Iam getting "Procedure expects parameter @ConsultantName, which was not supplied."
I have consultantname and other parameters built in my datatable.
Is it the correct way of doing?
Can someone help.It is urgent.
Urgent : Update() Function
Jun 2, 2000IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TABLE dbo.TestTrigger
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger') IS NOT NULL
PRINT '<<< FAILED DROPPING TABLE dbo.TestTrigger >>>'
ELSE
PRINT '<<< DROPPED TABLE dbo.TestTrigger >>>'
END
go
CREATE TABLE dbo.TestTrigger
(
colA int NULL,
colB int NULL
)
go
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger') IS NOT NULL
PRINT '<<< CREATED TABLE dbo.TestTrigger >>>'
ELSE
PRINT '<<< FAILED CREATING TABLE dbo.TestTrigger >>>'
go
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger_i') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger_i') IS NOT NULL
PRINT '<<< FAILED DROPPING TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i >>>'
ELSE
PRINT '<<< DROPPED TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i >>>'
END
go
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i
ON dbo.TestTrigger
FOR INSERT AS
IF UPDATE(colA)
select "updating col A"
IF UPDATE(colB)
select "updating col B"
go
go
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.TestTrigger_i') IS NOT NULL
PRINT '<<< CREATED TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i >>>'
ELSE
PRINT '<<< FAILED CREATING TRIGGER dbo.TestTrigger_i >>>'
go
insert into TestTrigger
(colA)
values
(1)
go
insert into TestTrigger
(colA, colB)
values
(2,3)
go