Unable To Resolve Column Level Collations

May 14, 2008

Hi,


When I try to execute a package I get this following error. I have a bunch of similar packages which runs fine on the same source(sybase) and destination(sqlserver 2005), just different tables. Only few of them fails and all of them have the same error of "Unable to resolve column level collations. Bulk-copy cannot continue". I checked for the dtatatype and length between source and destination, both are same. The user have all the required rights on the objects in both source and destination.


Error at Data Flow Task For Test1 - test_tbl_job [OLE DB Destination [16]]: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Unable to resolve column level collations. Bulk-copy cannot continue.".

Error at Data Flow Task For Test1 - test_tbl_job [OLE DB Destination [16]]: Failed to open a fastload rowset for "testdb..tbl2". Check that the object exists in the database.

On further trial and error I found that if I remove the fast load option, it works without glitch.

Its kind of wierd though....

Any body has faced this situation?

Thanks
Karunakaran

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Unable To Resolve Column Level Collations. Bulk-copy Cannot Continue

May 13, 2008

Hi,

When I try to execute a package I get this following error. I have a bunch of similar packages which runs fine on the same source(sybase) and destination(sqlserver 2005), just different tables. Only few of them fails and all of them have the same error of "Unable to resolve column level collations. Bulk-copy cannot continue". I checked for the dtatatype and length between source and destination, both are same. The user have all the required rights on the objects in both source and destination.

Error at Data Flow Task For Test1 - test_tbl_job [OLE DB Destination [16]]: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Unable to resolve column level collations. Bulk-copy cannot continue.".
Error at Data Flow Task For Test1 - test_tbl_job [OLE DB Destination [16]]: Failed to open a fastload rowset for "testdb..tbl2". Check that the object exists in the database.

Some body can shed light on this?

Thanks
Karun

View 6 Replies View Related

Updating Systemtables Directly To Change Column-collations

Mar 3, 2005

Hi there.

Is there any way to update the system tables directly, to alter the collations of the columns in the user db's?

I've tried the script below:

UPDATE Syscolumns SET collation = 'SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS' WHERE name = '<AddrCode>'
AND id = object_id('<Compliance>')

but, I get the following error message:

Server: Msg 271, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Column 'collation' cannot be modified because it is a computed column.

Can you please help me! I need to do thousands of these, and most of them has constraints on, so my script I generated to do the ALTER TABLE.... ALTER COLUMN does not suffice.

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Column Level Or Database Level Encryption/decryption....

Jan 16, 2008

I want to perform column level and database level encryption/decryption....
Does any body have that code written in C# or VB.NET for AES-128, AES-192, AES-256  algorithms...
I have got code for single string... but i want to encrypt/decrypt columns and sometimes the whole database...
Can anybody help me out...
If you have Store procedure in SQL for the same then also it ll do...
Thanks in advance

View 1 Replies View Related

Working Since Morning, Simple Error But Unable To Resolve, ERROR : 26 , Please Help

Dec 15, 2006

dear friends,
 i started using Asp.net for developing webparts, web parts automatically connect to a database to be created and saved in the database.
i had already Sql Server 2005 Express Edition installed so my webpart page ran and automatically created the database "AspNetDb" in the "App_Data" folder.
but when i uninstalled Sql Server 2005 Express Edition and then installed the Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition, it gave me the following Error 26 as below :

--------------------------------------------------------- Beginning of Error Message -------------------------------------------------- 
 An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server.  When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. SQLExpress database file auto-creation error:
The connection string specifies a local Sql Server Express instance using a database location within the applications App_Data directory. The provider attempted to automatically create the application services database because the provider determined that the database does not exist. The following configuration requirements are necessary to successfully check for existence of the application services database and automatically create the application services database:

If the applications App_Data directory does not already exist, the web server account must have read and write access to the applications directory. This is necessary because the web server account will automatically create the App_Data directory if it does not already exist.
If the applications App_Data directory already exists, the web server account only requires read and write access to the applications App_Data directory. This is necessary because the web server account will attempt to verify that the Sql Server Express database already exists within the applications App_Data directory. Revoking read access on the App_Data directory from the web server account will prevent the provider from correctly determining if the Sql Server Express database already exists. This will cause an error when the provider attempts to create a duplicate of an already existing database. Write access is required because the web server accounts credentials are used when creating the new database.
Sql Server Express must be installed on the machine.
The process identity for the web server account must have a local user profile. See the readme document for details on how to create a local user profile for both machine and domain accounts.
--------------------------------------------------------- End of Error Message -------------------------------------------------- 
then when i checked the Machine.config file, i found this....
  <connectionStrings>    <add name="LocalSqlServer" connectionString="data source=.SQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=SSPI;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|aspnetdb.mdf;User Instance=true" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />  </connectionStrings>
then i thought it's becoz, of the datasource thing that the Machine.Config file supports by default the default free edition of Sql Server 2005 which is the Sql Server 2005 Express Edition.
but friend in my company we use Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition, so can anybody pls guide me and get me out of this soup on helping me to use Sql Server 2005 Enterprise Edition by modifying either 1) Machine.Config File and/or  2) Web.Config file and/or 3) any other way, but please help i want to do this, please......
regards and thanks
Gurjit Singh 

View 2 Replies View Related

Column Level Constraints

Jul 17, 2001

Hello all.

First of all, I've been a reader of swynk.com for quite sometime now, and I'd like to say 'thank you' to everyone who contributes.

Today, I'm the town moron.. haha I'm having issues with column level constraints. I have a varchar(50) where I want to keep *,=,#,/, .. etc, OUT OF the value input. I don't want to strip them. I simply want for sql to throw an error if the insert contains those (and other characters). The only characters that I want in the column are A-Z and 0-9. However, it's not a set number of characters per insert. It always varies... There has to be an easier way to do this than creating a constraint for every possibilty... Any help would be greatly appreciated.

tia,

Jeremy

View 4 Replies View Related

Corruption At Column-Level~~

Dec 22, 2007

Is it possible to have a corruption in one of the columns in a table at a specific row? If yes, what could be the possible causes for such corruption?
Why I am asking? Because it happened that I wasn't able to read the value of a specific column but I was able to update it with other value! it sounds weird if you are able to write but not to read!!
**I wasn't able to read but after I updated it with another value...it was readable...
Please advise...??

View 1 Replies View Related

Concurrency Down To The Column Level - Sql

May 15, 2007



Using VS05 pro SP1...



(I AM REPOSTING THIS IN SQL FROM VB LANGUAGE BECAUSE I RECEIVED NO RESPONSES...ANY HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATED)



This is for a telephony application using Last In Wins concurrency...



Basically, we want to update only the columns that have changed in a row, not the entire row with the few changed columns. We are using TableAdapters exclusively.



We need concurrency down to the column level...that is to say, if a concurrency exception is thrown, we don't just want the new row to be UPDATED and overwrite the old row in the datasource...we only want the new columns to be UPDATED to the datasource...consider the following sequence...



- Fill table A and table B identically

- change column1 value in table A

- Update table A

- change column2 value in table B

- Update table B - this will generate a concurrency error.



Most of the help centers around using the merge command, to update table B, but in the situation above, we would lose the change to column1 (which we don't want to loose). Merge preserves the changes in table B (column2), but it would have the old value for column1, thus we would loose the value in column 1 when we updated the new merged table.



So, we need a way to build a datatable made up of the values in the datasouce plus the changes in the table B, which we will then update.



I have played endlessly with for/next type of constructs to build the new table of new column values using row version data, but I cannot get it to happen.



Upon exception for UPDATING table B, how do we build a temporary table from the datasource (so we get the change to column 1) and the new changes in table B, so we can update the temporary table and not loose any data.



Thanks!

Bob

View 1 Replies View Related

Column Level Security

Apr 29, 2008



Hey,
I have 3 columns in a table Ex:
Select Column1,Column2,Column from TableName

No. 1. Person A should have permission to read values only (Column1, Column3 of the table) -
2. Person B, should have permission to read only (Column 2).

Here my question is , I have to write one single stored procedure to statisfy both conditions. Which means, if person A execute this stored procedure , he shoud get only column 1 & 3 values . similarly other person b should get column 2 value. Ex:
Column 1 - Empid
Column 2 - SSN (Only for Top user display)
Column 3 - Join Date
Person A & B as a SQL or Windows login

Thanks



View 1 Replies View Related

Column Level Permissions For Server 7

Jun 24, 2000

Is there a graphical tool to manage column-level permissions just as it was possible in Enterprise Manager for Server 6.X ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Global Column Level Security - Best Way?

Apr 30, 2008



Hi,

I am trying to find the best way to implement a complex column based security.
Basically i need to secure data among lot of tables with millions of rows, so that some users may see some columns and others see diferent ones...
Whats the best way to implement this kind of procedure securely and flexible?

Best Regards,

View 4 Replies View Related

Do You Know Anything About Collations

Nov 5, 2003

I want to change the collation on a column to be case-sensitive without affecting anything else. What do I do?

View 1 Replies View Related

Collations

Jun 26, 2003

Can anyone point me to collation chart for Latin1_General and CP850?

I'm having conversion difficulties dealing with diacritics and want to look into the specifics.

Thanks,

Al

View 1 Replies View Related

Collations

Nov 2, 2007

Hi there. I'm trying to create a copy of a remote database for development purposes. I am useing MySQL, the remote database is in MSSQL. The create table commands contain a collation titled

quote:SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS

which MySQL doesn't recognise. The three most similar collations I can find in MySQL are:
quote:
'latin1_general_ci',
'latin2_general_ci'
'latin7_general_ci'


Does anyone know the difference between these collations? And whether any of them is equivalent to the MSSQL code I have to implement?

thanks! Dave

View 3 Replies View Related

Need Help With Collations

Jul 20, 2005

I want to create a database where the table names / column names / SP namesare NOTcase sensitive but where the data in the tables is, so that I canbuild a unique index where 'test' and TEST' is accepted as different.I have tried Installing SQL with a Collation designator with the CaseSensitive option checked- this caused all sp names / column names / table names to be casesensitive - not what I want.I have also tried installing SQL and selecting a SQL Collation and pickingan option from the drop down list. - again this cause everything to be casesensitive - not desiredDo I have to install SQL with a non case sensitive collation, then set eachcolumn in the table to be case sensitive? What if any are the problems I amlikely to come across?ThanksSteve

View 2 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Combining Result In Column Level

May 14, 2014

Below is my sample table and data

With Item as(
Select 1 as ItemId,'ItemName1' as ItemName,100 as position union all
Select 2 as ItemId,'ItemName2' as ItemName,200 as position union all
Select 3 as ItemId,'ItemName3' as ItemName,300 as position union all
Select 4 as ItemId,'ItemName4' as ItemName,400 as position union all
Select 5 as ItemId,'ItemName5' as ItemName,500 as position union all
Select 6 as ItemId,'ItemName6' as ItemName,600 as position union all
Select 7 as ItemId,'ItemName7' as ItemName,700 as position),

Mapping as (
Select 1 as Parent, 2 as child union all
Select 1 as Parent, 3 as child union all
Select 1 as Parent, 4 as child union all
Select 5 as Parent, 6 as child union all
Select 5 as Parent, 7 as child )Expected Result:

ParentItemIdParentItemNameParentpositionChildItemIdChildItemNameChildposition
1ItemName11002ItemName2200
1ItemName11003ItemName3300
1ItemName11004ItemName4400
5ItemName55006ItemName6600
5ItemName55007ItemName7700

I was thinking to achieve using union all but if i use union all it will combine the result in rows level. but i need in column level.

View 5 Replies View Related

Native Exception On Column-Level In SQLCE

Nov 30, 2007

Hi,
I have developed a Smart Device Application using VB.NET 2003 on top of Windows Mobile 2003 platform which is running on Symbol PPT 8846, a model used in our construction sites for gathering data bar-coded on Pipes, trucks...etc. This application uses SQL CE as its back-end database and since its difficult to cover our sites with WI-FI coverage, most of the time the application is running offline. As for that, on a daily basis, synchronization is done in the offices before the system is released into sites. I have been doing several implementations in several projects and till now everything is running fine but until I got a native exception on exporting the data back into the server database. The server database or main database is using Fox Pro and this is what led me to build a Web Service for communication between SQL CE and Fox Pro. Anyways, going back to that mysterious exception, I did some of my intensive debug on what caused it. As a start, I went through the code line by line to check if there was a memory leak from P/Invokes; but I was shocked that the exception was raised from "SQLCEDataAdapter.Fill(Dataset)" function. First thought came to mind was to hard reset and to re-install the application but no luck. Since it was about SQLCE, I moved towards checking the data found in the SQLCE database and tried to de-fragment the data found under the table needed for export. What I mean by de-fragmenting is that I grouped the data under different classes or families and created different tables depending on these classes. Then tried exporting again and Bingo the data was exported except one record...That was so weird!! huh? (The database had 515 records)
So I went for the Query Analyzer to try to view that record but no hope, it was taking too long to view the record, I just left it for more than 15 minutes and still no response from the Analyzer...it was so strange since there was only one record in that table!!!?!!! As going further, I was so curious why this record causing that native and inability to be viewed by the Analyzer?? I did testing on the column-level of that record and found out that you can view all the columns except two : nvarchar(200) and nvarchar (20)....I was able to resolve this problem with an SQL statement to update both columns with empty or dummy values...!!!!!
But after this resolution, I really don't know how it could be controlled later on!! and why it happened??
I would be glad if anyone can give me any advise on why such problem popped out and especially on the column-level in SQL CE?? And how to overcome it?

Thanks for your time and effort,

Looking forward to hear from as soon as possible...


Just for Clarification:
.NET CF 1.0 SP3

SQLCE 2.0
were used

View 1 Replies View Related

Information For Column-Level Merge Replication

Aug 22, 2005

Please provide me a column-level merge replication in SQL Server 2005. In the SQL Sever books online, I could able to get very few informaiton about this topic. Please provide me a best practices for using this kind of conflict resolution in Merge-replication.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL2000 Collations

Feb 4, 2002

Hi,
I noticed that when I installed SQL2000,with "typical install",
the default, the following will be used:
SQL collation (dictionary order, case-insensitive, assent sensitive)
sp_helpsort will give
SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI

Is there any difference if I choose the "custom install", then and choose
the windows locale which gives the result of sp_helpsort:
Latin1_General_CI_AI

SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI is supposed for backward compatibilty, so are
they actually equivalent ??
Any impact or difference we have to be aware of ??
Anyone knows..Thx

View 1 Replies View Related

Changing Collations...

Mar 2, 2006

I have looked thru the forum but have a couple of questions:
1) data base was created with case insensitive collation
2) all the tables were then create (72 tables) and by default got the CI collation on all columns
3) lots of data was added 2GB
4) discovered mistake and altered the database to have case sensitive collation
5)..... how to change all the collations for all the columns without doing them all manually
can i backup the database and change some settings and restore it?
export all the data, drop and recreate tables and import data?
????

View 7 Replies View Related

Changing Collations

Dec 19, 2005

Hi,We have around 150 databases as case sensitive, and we are planning tochange it to case insensitive. Each database has around 180 tables, Ihave changed the collation on DB, but changing collation manually oneach column is a daunting process. Is there any script or tool whichcan assist in doing this.Appreciate your help.ThanksSAI

View 5 Replies View Related

Collations And Nvarchar

Aug 22, 2007

Should a programmer bother using nvarchar for a person's name (special chracters allowed) if I still use SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS?

View 1 Replies View Related

Really Challenging Complex Column Level Processing Question

Oct 19, 2007

Hi,

I have to implement a complex algorithm that processes each row and each column.I have bunch complex steps at the end of which a table gets populated with the processed columns.


My question is as to what is the best way to do this?CLR integration or T-SQL?
Also I would appreciate any ideas as to how to go about using either approaches.

One of the steps of processing involved per column is as follows:-
1)For each column,find successive invalid values from the start of the column.Invalid value= any value <0
2)find the invalid value depth of each column(no of successive invalid values from start)
3)If after these invalid vlaues,there is a valid value and another invalid value,replace current invalid value with valid value.
ie replace invalid value only if it has a valid value above it.
4)find the column with maximum invalue value depth and delete that many rows from the table.

Here's am example:-
Suppose there are 2 columsn colA and ColB.The columns have different datatypes eg decimal,int,string etc.
For simplicity colA and colB are ints.
RowID is keeping track of the row number.

suppose colA has the following data

RowID ColA
-----------
1 0
2 -5
3 -3
4 1
5 4
6 -9
7 5
8 8

Step1)successive invalid values from start=0,-5,-3
Step2)Invalid value depth=3(because there are 3 rows from step 1)
Step3)0,-5,-3 do not have any valid value above them.But -9 has a valid value 4 above it.So replace -9 with 4.

so colA after the algo will look as follows
RowID ColA
------------
1 0
2 -5
3 -3
4 1
5 4
6 4(replaced -9 with 4)
7 5
8 8

Now do the next column colB
RowID ColA
------------
1 -6
2 0
3 0
4 -7
5 4
6 8
7 -5
8 -8

Step1)successive invalid values from start=-6,0,0,-7
Step2)depth of invalid values=4
Step3)Next invalid value -5 occurs at RowID 7
and has a valid value 8 above it.
Replace -5 with previous valid vlaue ie 8.

RowID 8 has invalid value -8 .Its previous invalid value(-5) got replaced by a valid value 8.So replace RowID8 also with value of RowID 7 ie 8

Output at the end of these steps
RowID ColA
------------
1 -6
2 0
3 0
4 -7
5 4
6 8
7 8(replaced -5 with 8)
8 8(replaced -8 with 8)

Step4:Get the maximum invalid value depth
In this case ColB had depth=4 which is greater than ColA which had dept=3.so delete 4 rows from the beginning of the table
So the table will be

RowID colA colB
----------------------------------------
5 4 4
6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 8
7 5 8 (replaced -5 with 8)
8 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)

Thanks in advance for your help

coolaqua


View 8 Replies View Related

Query Analyzer Error Unable To Connect Server Local Msg17, Level 16,state 1/ODBC SQL Server Driver [DBNETLIB]SQL Server Does Not

Oct 20, 2007

I am getteing
need help
Query analyzer error Unable to connect server local Msg17, level 16,state 1
ODBC SQL server driver [DBNETLIB]SQL server does not exist

View 6 Replies View Related

English And German Collations

Apr 10, 2007

I have developed a tool to allow project developers to easily re-create the entire schema for our base product. The current issue involves setting the correct collation for the customers' region. Our brother company in Germany uses the same db creation tool and scripts, and we here in the US also have customers in South America. My ultimate question is "what subset of collation names would be necessary to provide the project developer?" I could query the database to get all the collation names, but I think it was around 1000 names. Can I query to get a smaller subset of the most relevant collation names?

Ed

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Column Level Data Encryption

Jun 17, 2015

I need to encrypt some column level data in multiple tables in SQL server 2014. I've never tried encryption in SQL server 2014. How can I achieve it?

View 4 Replies View Related

A T-SQL Function To Check Column Level Data For Special Charaters

Nov 30, 2007

I need to create a function that will check data inputted by a user into a column anc check for special charaters. If any of these exist then block the insert.

Any help will be appreciated!

Paul

View 10 Replies View Related

Changing Collations For Master Database.

May 3, 2004

Hi there


I am using SQL server 2000 and
I want to Change Server Collations from SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN to
SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.

Can anybody help me in this regard.

Rgds

Wilson

View 5 Replies View Related

Collations And Simple Import From A Csv-file

Apr 23, 2007

Hello. Here a two different problems that occur one and a while when I try to import a textfile to SQL Server 2005.

I have a flat file connection to a csv-file that originally is a export from an AS4000 DB2 database
This csv-file is defined as a variable length file
Why do SSIS automatically interpret the length of each column as varchar(50)? It does not matter if a define the same file as a fixed lenght file. The problem is that I will get a warning that information in columns will be truncated. I would like to do a direct export to the SQL Server 2005 table with shorter varchar fields. I can solve this by using the task for transforming data types but this only works on the text fields. This task cannot transform a string to a decimal or an integer column in the SQL Server 2005 table. Is there no other way than having a staging table between the text file and the SSIS-data pipe?
I also get a lot of collation or code page errors even if we set the receiving columns to nvarchar and nchar. Is there any good article on this subject? Code page errors

Last question. Is there parameter support in the data reader source connection?



I appreciate all help.

Regards

Thomas Ivarsson

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Determine Which Service Pack Level Your SQL Server Is Running And Column Name Spacing Bug?

Aug 10, 2007

I have visual studio 2005 with XP home. I'm trying to find out which service pack my SQL server is running as I've been told that Service pack 2 has a few bugs.

For example ADO Applications Report a Syntax Error When Column Names Contain Spaces. This appears to be an error i am recieving. I just wanted to confirm that it is a microsoft bug rather then something Im doing wrong.
Microsoft meantions the bug here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/264687



I've been looking everywhere. I do not have the "query analyzer window" where you can find this out as I have VS 2005. How would I find this out.

Thank you

View 6 Replies View Related

Generates Msg 107, Level 16, State 2, Line 2 - Column Prefix Does Not Exist (Oh Yes It Does.. Anyone Got A Solution ?)

Aug 8, 2007



hi All,

Following code generates error 107 (SQL Server 2000, SP3a):

SELECT

*
FROM

dbo.AssessmentItemHierarchy Parent

INNER JOIN dbo.RaterCategory

INNER JOIN dbo.RaterType

ON RaterCategory.ID = RaterType.RaterCategoryID

INNER JOIN dbo.AssessmentRater

ON AssessmentRater.RaterTypeID = RaterType.ID

INNER JOIN dbo.AssessmentItem

ON AssessmentItem.ID = Parent.ChildItemID

INNER JOIN dbo.Assessment

ON AssessmentItem.AssessmentID = Assessment.ID

INNER JOIN dbo.AssessmentResponse

ON AssessmentResponse.AssessmentItemID = AssessmentItem.ID

ON AssessmentResponse.AssessmentRaterID = AssessmentRater.ID

INNER JOIN dbo.ImageInstance

ON ImageInstance.ID = RaterType.ImageInstanceID

INNER JOIN dbo.AssessmentItem ParentGUID

ON Parent.ParentItemID = ParentGUID.ID

Error on Run:

Msg 107, Level 16, State 2, Line 2

The column prefix 'Parent' does not match with a table name or alias name used in the query.



The only work-around I have found is a rewrite of order:

SELECT

*
FROM

AssessmentItemHierarchy Parent

INNER JOIN RaterCategory

INNER JOIN RaterType

INNER JOIN AssessmentRater

INNER JOIN AssessmentItem

INNER JOIN Assessment ON AssessmentItem.AssessmentID = Assessment.ID

INNER JOIN AssessmentResponse ON AssessmentItem.ID = AssessmentResponse.AssessmentItemID

ON AssessmentRater.ID = AssessmentResponse.AssessmentRaterID

ON RaterType.ID = AssessmentRater.RaterTypeID

ON RaterCategory.ID = RaterType.RaterCategoryID

INNER JOIN ImageInstance

ON RaterType.ImageInstanceID = ImageInstance.ID

ON Parent.ChildItemID = AssessmentItem.ID

INNER JOIN AssessmentItem ParentGUID ON Parent.ParentItemID = ParentGUID.ID




Not very pretty... anyone know why I'm getting this error message with the first version of my query?

View 1 Replies View Related

Miss Match Between Column Type In A Cursor. Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5

Nov 16, 2006

hi

I have a float column . only in cursor I get a type missmatch.

does any one knows it ?

the error

Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5, Line 14

Error converting data type varchar to float.

the code

DECLARE @RON_FLOAT FLOAT

DECLARE RON_CURSOR CURSOR FOR

SELECT RON_FLOAT

FROM RON_TABLE1

OPEN RON_CURSOR

FETCH NEXT FROM RON_CURSOR

INTO @RON_FLOAT

WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0

BEGIN



PRINT 'VALUE IS ' + @RON_FLOAT

FETCH NEXT FROM RON_CURSOR

INTO @RON_FLOAT

END

CLOSE RON_CURSOR

DEALLOCATE RON_CURSOR



the code for the table

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[RON_TABLE1](

[RON_FLOAT] [float] NULL,

[RON_CHAR] [nchar](10) COLLATE Hebrew_BIN NULL

)

View 1 Replies View Related

Reporting Services :: SSRS Interactive Filter At The Column Level (Like In Excel)?

May 21, 2015

Is it possible to have Interactive Filters in an SSRS report like in Excel at Column Level as highlighted below.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved