We're using Windows Authentication with our SQL Server. We've added a domain group to the SQL Server groups and would like to give it a default schema. The properties window is the same for users and groups but the default schema field is enable only for user entities. We cannot add a default schema to a group.
View 89 RepliesWe have a new development SQL2005 server.
To implement secutiry on this new server we decided to grant rights to NT-groups.
We defined an NT-group Programmersmembers and gave this group the necessary rights.
The problem now is when a member of this NT-group creates a table (this group is dbo in the development database) everything works fine as expected.
But when a member of this group tries to make a new table through 'Microsoft SQL server management studio' they receive the error that there is no default schema available.
But it seems to be impossible to map a default schema to an NT-Group.
=> Does this means we have no other way than to give each individual programmer the necessary rights and assign them to a default schema.
It is no option to force our programmers to create each table through a script on the development database.
Or is there another option ?
==SQL Server 2005 SP2==Is it possible to set the default schema in code?I know that, for a particular DB user, I can set the default schemastatically in Mgmt Studio. However, I want to do this dynamicallyin source code.I am using JDBC if that matters.Any help appreciated.TIAaj
View 1 Replies View Related
I Would like to create a schema sample and make it as default schema instead of dbo.
If a user logs in and creates a table like create table t1 (no int ) .
it would be assigned to sample schema and displayed as sample.t1 not dbo.t1.
How to set the user created schema as primary schema.
Hi,
Re: sql server 2005
I recently migrated a database from one server to another. In the process of doing this, I renamed one of the sql server 2000 migrated logins to a new name, using "alter login with name" and "alter user with name"
Now, I'm having problems with permissions. This user cannot execute sp_send_dbmail, even though it has explicit execute permissions on this stored proc in the msdb database.
What I noticed about this user is that is carried over a default schema from the old 2000 server. I'm beginning to think that this has something to do with the lost permissions. So I tried to drop the default schema. No dice. Next, I set the default schema to dbo. That still didn't work.
Can someone please tell me how to drop a default schema for a user? I've tried everything I can think of, from removing the schema name from the properties windows, to "alter user". Nothing has worked.
Thanks
During deployment of my database project I receive the following error:
"The default schema does not exist."
What could be causing this error?
I am confused.
I added my NT account to the sql server logins for my sql server (2005), then I added a corresponding user account to my database. I then set my default schema. I connect to the database, and the default schema seems to be set to dbo.
Can anyone thing of a reason why this might be happening? Is there some sort of override if I have additional privledges on the server?
I appreciate any thoughts...
-Mike Graham
Hi,
I have SQL Server Management Studio and SQL Server 2000.
What I want to know is:
Is there any way to prevent displaying default schema or owner, when viwing the "tables list" in the object browser?
eg. Instead of
dbo.MyTable1
dbo.MyTable2
....
I want to view as
MyTable1
MyTable2
Thanks
Srinika
I'm migrating a dotnetnuke website from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005 and have run into a problem with one of the stored procedures.
The database objects seem to have upgraded successfully to use the db schema identifer from the dbowner identifier. However I am having a problem with a particular stored procedure trying to execute another stored procedure.
When the following procedure is called, it seems that the db engine has forgotten the schema context and therefore can't find the called procedure. Has anyone come across this before and is there a workaround other than modifing every SP that uses EXEC?
ALTER PROCEDURE [myschema].[dnn_Forum_StatisticsGet]
(
@ModuleID int,
@UpdateWindow int = 12,
@TabId int
)
...
BEGIN
EXEC dnn_Forum_AA_StatisticsSiteUpdate 0, 0, @ModuleID, @TabId
END
...
Does anyone know how to tell sp_rename to look in a schema other than the default.
The code below reproduces the problem.
-- WORKS IN default schema
--
create table dbo.TestDF1(
dfField intconstraint DF1 default 0
)
go
sp_rename 'DF1', 'DF2', 'OBJECT'
go
Select name
From
sys.default_constraints
where
object_name(parent_object_id) = 'TestDF1'
go
drop table dbo.TestDF1
go
-- DOESN'T WORK IN added schema
--
create schema TestSchema
go
create table TestSchema.TestDF2(
dfField intconstraint DF3 default 0
)
go
sp_rename 'DF3', 'DF4', 'OBJECT'
go
Msg 15248, Level 11, State 1, Procedure sp_rename, Line 315
Either the parameter @objname is ambiguous or the claimed @objtype (OBJECT) is wrong.
---------------------------
drop table TestSchema.TestDF2
go
drop schema TestSchema
go
Hi
For MSSQL 2005 server, when we create new user using stored procedure sp_grantdbaccess, it creates schema with name given to user.
While when we create new user with query " Create login identfied by'password'. It attach user to default schema at the server.
My question is can we have a default schema assigned to the user, while user is created with sp_grantdbaccess?
Is there any way to do so?
Please reply as early as possible.
i have database and set default table schema to "ray" and me must input ruy.TABLE-NAME for retrive data !!! , i need set Default Schema to current user for call database as just database name(for my program) , how changed it ? (i change default schema for current user by alter command but not worked !)
View 1 Replies View RelatedDear All,
I am using SQLServer 2005, I have setup a login user "User1" and next I setup database user using the same username and login name. After that I create a new schema "mySchema" and make "User1" as the owner of the schema. To "User1" I assigned the default schema to "mySchema", so far its working fine. But when I open the user's property window (dialogbox) the default schema always gets reset to "dbo".
What could be the problem here? Please help me if there is any solution to get the right schema which I assigned to the user.
Thanks and regards,
One of our databases has at some point in its dark past had the owner of the guest schema changed to be a named user, rather than the default guest user. Correcting this feels like it would be easy enough by running the following...
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON SCHEMA::guest TO guest
but that results in..
Msg 15150, Level 16, State 2, Line 3
Cannot alter the schema 'guest'.
I realise the guest schema is a special one, and cannot be dropped, but I'm not trying to do that. End goal is to export the database to a SQL Azure DB, and this guest schema assignment is blocking that process from completing.
Provided that we have 2 type of tables, the first type of tables with schema schema_a and the second type with schema schema_b.Also 2 filegroups apart from primary created: filegroup_a and filegroup_b.How can I configure so that when table with schema schema_a created, it can be put on filegroup filegroup_a automatically and when table with schema schema_b created, it can be put on filegroup filegroup_b automatically?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSo we have our HA group servers and databases, now we want to deploy schema changes to the HA group databases.
1.) Can we deploy the changes to Server2.mydatabase whilst still having Server1.mydatabase available to users?
2.) If yes, what is involved in doing so
3.) If no, What is the best suggestions to apply schema changes to HA databases.
Hi folks,
I got a message that 'Could not allocate space for object '(SYSTEM table id: -732777483)' in database 'TEMPDB' because the 'DEFAULT' filegroup is full.
Connection Broken'
Can you tell me how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Mike.
Hi,
I have a snapshot replication set up on a SQL 2K Server publishing to other SQL 2K servers. The publisher database has mutliple file groups - which is structured the same as the subscriber databases. The snapshot has been set to delete and recreate the tables on the subscribers - this is a performance decision as the tables are large and this is the better approach. The tables reside in their own file groups (but not the default). I want the replication agents to recreate these tables in the original file groups and not the default.
Is there a method within Replication to specify which file group to recreate the table in so it doesn't fill up the default file group?
Thanks in advance,
Pete
Hi am
i am facing problem adding a domain group to the reporting services.
while setting the security of a report, i am getting the rsUnknownUserName error while adding a domain group.
the group is valid and it does exists. i tried creating a windows group on the machine running reporting services and tried adding the domain group and it accepted. but the reporting services is not accepting.
can somebody tell me whats the problem with this.
i am able to add other domain group belonging to the same domain and the SSRS accepts but not this particular domain group which is like any other domain group.
Am trying to run SQL Server Agent with a service account which is not in the Administrators group. Have done the following -
1. Removed the service account from the Administrators group on the machine
2. Assigned sysadmin privileges to the service account
3. Added it to the SQLServer2005SQLAgentUser$ComputerName$MSSQLSERVER role
4. Through SQL Configuration Manager assigned this account to the SQL Server Agent service
However, this does not start the Agent as a service. What is it that is missing?
We are running SQL Server 2005 in a Windows 2003 domain and I have a situation where some of my users are unable to connect to the SQL Server unless they are a member of the sysadmin group. Any attempts by these users to login result in a login failed,
Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11
Which indicates that it is a valid user who does not have access to this SQL Server.
I have been able to narrow the failures down to the following situation:
Create a user, TestUser1, as a member of 1 domain local group TestGroup1
Give TestGroup1 access to SQL (standard public access to master)
All good. Login succeeds.
Add TestUser1 to another domain local group TestGroup2
Attempt to login to SQL Server -> login failed.
Add the user explicitly -> login failed
Add one of the groups to sysadmin -> login succeeds
It seems that as long as the user is a member of more than one AD group, and none of those groups is a member of the sysadmin server role then the user is unable to login. Obviously having all of the users as sysadmin isn't a workable solution, has anyone seen this issue before?
I have been able to replicate a similar situation in our test domain, but in that case the issue is resolved by adding the users explicitly to SQL Server (still not an ideal solution).
Interestingly, if I run the same test in our test domain but use global groups, it works. But unfortunately the network admin tells me the groups must stay as local.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Daniel Watkins
I've noticed at least five other posts on the web with this problem with no solutions given. Seems there are MANY people with this particular problem--hint:Microsoft Pay Attention. Help!
When installing SP2 for SQL Server 2005 I get this error message:
MSI (s) (E0!68) [09:02:25:673]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 (64-bit) -- Error 29512. SQL Server Setup was unable add user OUR-LAN-DOMAINOUR-SERVICE-ACCOUNT to local group OUR-LAN-DOMAINSQLServer2005SQLAgentUser$OUR-DATABASE-SERVER-NAME$MSSQLSERVER.
The error message seems to contradict itself: it says "local group" which seems to me to mean the group on the database server itself YET the group name is prefixed with our LAN domain name. So which one is it?
Also, I'm not sure if this message means there is a problem in Active Directory or in the security model of SQL Server itself. I don't think it means SQL Server itself because I don't think SQL Server has groups... it only has Roles, right?
We looked in Active Directory and the user above does indeed exist in the domain-level group mentioned.
Please help!
Environment: SQL Server 2014 on Windows Server 2012 R2.
We have our availability group configured and working. However, when we try to connect to the AG listener from a remote server, we have to use the fully qualified domain name (FQDN) to connect. We'd like to be able to connect just using the host name. Interestingly, ping actually resolves the IP correctly for either.
Locally I develop in SQL server 2005 enterprise. Recently I recreated my db on the server of my hosting company (in sql server 2005 express).I basically recreated the tables and copied the data in it.I now receive the following error when I hit the DB:The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' requires a
database schema compatible with schema version '1'. However, the
current database schema is not compatible with this version. You may
need to either install a compatible schema with aspnet_regsql.exe
(available in the framework installation directory), or upgrade the
provider to a newer version.I heard something about running aspnet_regsql.exe, but I dont have that access to the DB. Also I dont know if this command does anything more than creating the membership tables and filling it with some default data...Any other solutions/thought on what this can be?Thanks!
I have 35+ tables and 15+ stored procedures with SchemaA, now I want to transfer them to SchemaB.
I know how to do one by one...!
alter schema SchemaB transfer
SchemaA.TableA
but it will take long time...!
Thanks,
I have an SSRS 2012 table report with groups; each group is broken ie. one group for one page, and there are multiple groups in multiple pages.
'GroupName' column has multiple values - X,Y,Z,......
I need to group 'GroupName' with X,Y,Z,..... ie value X in page 1,value Y in page 2, value Z in page 3...
Now, I need to display another column (ABC) in this table report (outside the group column 'GroupName'); this outside column itself is another column header (not a group header) in the table (report) and it derives its name partly from the 'GroupName' values:
Example:
Value X for GroupName in page 1 will mean, in page 1, column Name of ABC column must be ABC-X Value Y for GroupName in page 2 will mean, in page 2, column Name of ABC column must be ABC-Y Value Z for GroupName in page 3 will mean, in page 3, column Name of
ABC column must be ABC-Z
ie the column name of ABC (Clm ABC) must be dynamic as per the GroupName values (X,Y,Z....)
Page1:
GroupName Clm ABC-X
X
Page2:
GroupName Clm ABC-Y
Y
Page3:
GroupName Clm ABC-Z
Z
I have been able to use First(ReportItems!GroupName.Value) in the Page Header to get GroupNames displayed in each page; I get X in page 1, Y in page 2, Z in page 3.....
However, when I use ReportItems (that refers to a group name) in the Report Body outside the group,
I get the following error:
Report item expressions can only refer to other report items within the same grouping scope or a containing grouping scope
I need to get the X, Y, Z ... in each page for the column ABC.
I have been able to use this - First(Fields!GroupName.Value); however, I get ABC-X, ABC-X, ABC-X in each of the pages for the ABC column, instead of ABC-X in page 1, ABC-Y in page 2, ABC-Z in page 3, ...
Hello everybody!I'm using ASP.NET 3.5, MSSQL 2005I bought virtual web hosting .On new user registrations i have an error =(The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' requires a database schema compatible with schema version '1'. However, the current database schema is not compatible with this version. You may need to either install a compatible schema with aspnet_regsql.exe (available in the framework installation directory), or upgrade the provider to a newer version. On my virtual machine it work fine but on web hosting i have an error =(What can you propose to me?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello,
I would like to use SSIS tool to move the data from one database schema to another database schema.
For example:
Source table has
1. UserName (varchar 20) (no null)
2. Email (varchar 50) (can be null)
Destination table has
1. UserID (uniqueidentifier - GUID)
2. UserName (varchar 50) (no null)
3. EmailAddress (nvarchar 50) (can be null)
4. DateTime
Questions:
1. What controls do I use in my Data Flow to make data move between databases with different data types and include new value in UserID as a new GUID and DateTime as a date (GETDATE)?
OLE DB Source, OLE DB Destination, Data Converson and .....
How do I insert Guid and Date at the same time?
2. I have many tables to do data moving. Any sugestions? How do I architect my project? If I create many data flows for each table - it will look complicated.
Please give me some advices here.
Thanks.
I used SSEUtil to add a schema to my database but I am having problems. Used these steps:SSEUtil -c> USE "c:Rich.mdf"> GO>!RUN Resume.SQL//indicates success>SELECT * FROM SYS.XML_SCHEMA_COLLECTIONS>GO//schema not shown in list> USE master>GO>SELECT * FROM SYS.XML_SCHEMA_COLLECTIONS>GO//schema is shown in the queryIt appears that the schema is not added to the desired database, so when I try to use the schema in Visual Studio, the schema does not appear when I connect to the Rich.mdf database. Any ideas on what I am doing wrong or why this might be happening?ThanksKevin
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am using sql server 2008 R2.I want to copy all the objects of one schema and put it in another schema. I want to do that from command prompt.
In oracle we can export the objects of one user and import to another user using exp and imp. I want similar type.
@pvColumnName VARCHAR(100) = Default,
However, I am unable to determine what is the value for Default. Is it '' ?
Default is not permitted as a constant - below fails to parse:
WHERE t2.TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
AND (@pvColumnName = Default OR t1.[COLUMN_NAME] Like @vColumnName)
Hi!
I've posted a feedback with Microsoft to see if we can get them to fix the issue described below, but so far no one from Microsoft has commented to let us know what they're doing about this problem! I'm posting this here to see if maybe we can get more people to rate this feedback or chime in on what a pain it is! Please feel free to add your own comments or how you had to work around this issue and whether or not you think this is something Microsoft should be addressing NOW.
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=311679
Provide Individual Page Numbering per Group and Total Pages per Group
Currently in a Reporting Services report, you can't readily reset the page number for each group in a table, nor can you display the total number of pages per group. For example, if I'm printing invoices and each invoice is a separate group, I'd like to be able to print "Page 1 of 5" , "Page 2 of 5" etc. for the first invoice, then "Page 1 of 3" when the next invoice begins, and so on. This was easy in Crystal Reports. I realize that Crystal Reports has a two-pass process that enables that kind of pagination. However, this is REALLY important functionality that's just missing from Reporting Services and I'm hoping you'll provide it REALLY SOON! Yeah, I know there are work-arounds if you can know exactly how many rows of information there are on each page. But gosh! That's not practical, especially if you have second level groups inside the main group or text blocks in rows that can 'grow' to more than one line. I've read a couple of work-arounds, but none of them works correctly and consistently when more than one user is running the same report or when you print the report while you're looking at it on the screen. I still may need access to the overall report page number and the overall total number of pages, so don't get rid of that. It's just that if you're doing this already for the entire report, I don't see why you can't do it per group! Lots of people have been asking for this for years, and I don't understand why it hasn't been implemented.
I've read a few articles on this topic, but no one has come up with a decent work around. My theory is that Microsoft should be addressing this immediately. This is major functionality that's just plain missing from SSRS and should have been there from the start. If anyone from Microsoft can let us know what's going on with this issue or if anyone would like for me to clarify this further, feel free to let me know.
Thanks!
Karen
I have an SSRS report with groups that when exported to excel contains drill-in's (plus marks on left side). The issue I have is that for all the groups in the drill-in, those cells become merged. I want to keep the group drill-in but have the cells UNMERGED. I have heard this can be done with the RDL XML but I don't know what to modify to accomplish this.
View 4 Replies View Related