Trying to figure out a SQL query.I have 2 identical tables: Table A and Table B..This query doesnt seem to be working:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT ClientID, sum(ABC), count(*)
FROM Table A
Where <condition>
[code]...
The result I am looking for is that for each ClientID, I need the total sum of ABC and total count.
I have 3 different companies that share the same ticket_types(CRMS System). I need to display the Ticket Types and the 3 company's Ticket Count:
Ticket Type | Company A Count | Company B Count | Company C Count
I can get the information individually for each company, but if a company doesn't have a ticket in one of the ticket_types, then it isn't displayed in a row. So, I tried to write the following, which isn't pulling back any data.
DECLARE @startdate date = '20150306'
DECLARE @enddate date = '20151031'
DECLARE @AcctGrp varchar(20) = '111'
;WITH TType
AS
(
SELECT ctp.description as TicketType
[Code] .....
If I run each SELECT individually from above (excluding the last SELECT), it works and I get the following:
TicketType
AR Request Credit
Availability/Rush
Cancel Order
Credit Card Payment
Expedite Order
Freight Quote
[Code] ...
How to get the query results? Am I even close to getting it right?
I'm kinda embarrased, it's been quite awhile since I've played with SQL or Access but here's my brain fart. I need to open an access DB by the name of eHomes. Inside there are two tables AD_IMAGE & PROPERTY. Property is the main table and stores most of the info. It has a field in it called AD_ID and others except for the image file name. The AD_IMAGE table just keeps the image file name and has 3 fields: ID - AD_ID - & Image1. The problem is when the ad is deleted from the property table the AD_IMAGE table record referring to the PROPERTY.AD_ID doen't get deleted. So, I just want the AD_IMAGE table cleaned up to match what's active in the PROPERTY table using the common AD_ID fields in both tables.
Thanks
Hellow Folks.
Here is the Original Data in my single SQL 2005 Table:
Department: Sells:
1 Meat
1 Rice
1 Orange
2 Orange
2 Apple
3 Pears
The Data I would like read separated by Semi-colon:
Department: Sells:
1 Meat;Rice;Orange
2 Orange;Apple
3 Pears
I would like to read my data via SP or VStudio 2005 Page . Any help will be appreciated. Thanks..
When I connect two table should they always have a column in common with each other?For example the 'patients' and 'doctors' tables in that ER are connected to say each doctor can have many patients and each patient can have many doctors, but they have no columns in common. Is it right?
View 8 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am trying to query for a common value in a column called "file_auth_nbr" in 30 different tables. I was going to try something like this (see below) but wasn't sure if this was the most efficient, fastest, or correct, way to get what I'm looking for:
Select distinct a.file_auth_nbr from table1 as a
join table2 as b
on a.file_auth_nbr = b.file_auth_nbr
join table3 as c
on a.file_auth_nbr = c.file_auth_nbr
join table4 as d
on a.file_auth_nbr = d.file_auth_nbr
join table5 as e
on a.file_auth_nbr = e.file_auth_nbr
......etc., etc.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated,
Jeff
I am creating a query which will show patients that are enrolled in more than one program, but I need to exclude those patients that enrolled more than once in the same program. Here's part of the code:
SELECT member_id, service_id
FROM pat_prg_info ppi
This query produces results like the following:
member_id service_id
1001 1
1001 2
1003 9
1003 9
1004 2
1004 9
I would like to exclude 1003, since this member_id is enrolled twice in service_id 9. How can I accomplish this?
Hey,
I'm new to this whole SQL Server 2005 thing as well as database design and I've read up on various ways I can integrate business constraints into my database. I'm not sure which way applies to me, but I could use a helping hand in the right direction.
A quick explanation of the various tables I'm dealing with:
WBS - the Work Breakdown Structure, for example: A - Widget 1, AA - Widget 1 Subsystem 1, and etc.
Impacts - the Risk or Opportunity impacts for the weights of a part/assembly. (See Assemblies have Impacts below)
Allocations - the review of the product in question, say Widget 1, in terms of various weight totals, including all parts. Example - September allocation, Initial Demo allocation, etc. Mostly used for weight history and trending
Parts - There are hundreds of Parts which will eventually lead to thousands. Each part has a WBS element. [Seems redundant, but parts are managed in-house, and WBS elements are cross-company and issued by the Government]
Parts have Allocations - For weight history and trending (see Allocations). Example, Nut 17 can have a September 1st allocation, a September 5th allocation, etc.
Assemblies - Parts are assemblies by themselves and can belong to multiple assemblies. Now, there can be multiple parts on a product, say, an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV), and so those parts can belong to a higher "assembly" [For example, there can be 3 Nut 17's (lower assembly) on Widget 1 Subsystem 2 (higher assembly) and 4 more on Widget 1 Subsystem 5, etc.]. What I'm concerned about is ensuring that the weight roll-ups are accurate for all of the assemblies.
Assemblies have Impacts - There is a risk and opportunity impact setup modeled into this design to allow for a risk or opportunity to be marked on a per-assembly level. That's all this table represents.
A part is allocated a weight and then assigned to an assembly. The Assemblies table holds this hierarchical information - the lower assembly and the higher one, both of which are Parts entries in the [Parts have Allocations] table.
Therefore, to ensure proper weight roll ups in the [Parts have Allocations] table on a per part-basis, I would like to check for any inserts, updates, deletes on both the [Parts have Allocations] table as well as the [Assemblies] table and then re-calculate the weight roll up for every assembly. Now, I'm not sure if this is a huge performance hog, but I do need to keep all the information as up-to-date and as accurate as possible. As such, I'm not sure which method is even correct, although it seems an AFTER DML trigger is in order (from what I've gathered thus far). Keep in mind, this trigger needs to go through and check every WBS or Part and then go through and check all of it's associated assemblies and then ensure the weights are correct by re-summing the weights listed.
If you need the design or create script (table layout), please let me know.
Thanks.
Hi!
I am designing a dimension table which will include a short name column based on the (full) name column. For example say Product dimension where I will have ProductName and ProductShortName. ProductShortName will be the first 6 characters of ProductName. I could populate ProductShortName using:
Substring in the select when I select from the original system, e.g. SUBSTR(PRODUCT_NAME, 1, 6) AS ProductShortName
Create a derived column in the SSIS flow which does the same thing
Create the ProductShortName column as a computed column which uses substring on ProductName
Create a trigger that populates ProductShortName based on ProductName when a row is inserted or updated
Create a named calculation in the table in the Analysis Services project's data source view
Create a named query in the Analysis Services project's data source view
I usually use 1, and 5 or 6 would only be used if I only will create reports against the cubes. 3 seems easiest to maintain, so I am thinking about using that one, but maybe it is slow for the data flow as I imagine it must be something like using 4, or when is the column "created" at runtime, i.e. when the table is queried?
Which approach(es) do or would you use? Pros and cons?
Thanks!
I have a GridView dispalying from a SQLServerDataSource that is using a SQL Select Union statement (like the following):
SELECT FirstName, LastNameFROM MasterUNION ALLSELECT FirstName, LastNameFROM CustomORDER BY LastName, FirstName
I am wondering how to create Update and Insert statements for this SQLServerDataSource since the select is actually driving from two different tables (Master and Custom). Any ideas if or how this can be done? Specifically, I want the Custom table to be editable, but not the Master table. Any examples or ideas would be very much appreciated!
Thanks,
Randy
Hello,I have a (big) table which is not normalized, but for i need at themoment i thinkthat's no problem. Indeed, what i would like to do is to select thename field andthe note. The problem is that i want to display the note in 2different columns.the first columns will show the number (count) of time that a certainnote (e.g note=4)appears for a certain name and in the other column the same thing butfor a different note value.so each column noteX will display the number of time that the notewith the value X appears for each namefor example, to the following table:Name | note | job | city | id |----------------------------------------john | 4 | jb1 | hamb | 1 |john | 5 | jb2 | hamb | 2 |john | 5 | jb3 | hamb | 3 |john | 5 | jb4 | hamb | 4 |Mark | 4 | jb1 | mun | 5 |Mark | 4 | jb2 | mun | 6 |Mark | 4 | jb5 | mun | 7 |Mark | 5 | jb1 | mun | 8 |peter | 5 | jb3 | berl | 9 |peter | 5 | jb5 | berl | 10 |frank | 4 | jb6 | v.form | 11 |frank | 5 | jb3 | v.form | 12 |frank | 5 | jb2 | v.form | 13 |the result should be:Name | note5 | note4 |-------------------------john | 3 | 1 |Mark | 1 | 3 |peter | 2 | 0 |frank | 2 | 1 |How should be the right SQL command to show the data i want?Rui DiasJoin Bytes!Thanks a lot
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am writing a stored procedure that takes in a customer number, a current (most recent) sales order quote, a prior (to most current) sales order quote, a current item 1, and a prior item 1, all of these parameters are required.Then I have current item 2, prior item 2, current item 3, prior item 3, which are optional.
I added an IF to check for the value of current item 2, prior item 2, current item 3, prior item 3, if there are values, then variable tables are created and filled with data, then are retrieved. As it is, my stored procedure returns 3 sets of data when current item 1, prior item 1, current item 2, prior item 2, current item 3, prior item 3 are passed to it, and only one if 2, and 3 are omitted.I would like to learn how can I return this as a one data set, either using a full outer join, or a union all?I am including a copy of my stored procedure as it is.
I have a excel file which has a column called "Code" and their values are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H. I want to create a new column called "status" based on the values of "Code".
Code:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
If A,C,E,G then "status" = "Active" else if B,D,F,H then "Status" = "Inactive". I like to do it using "Derived Column".
I have a union all query from 2 databases that I would like to have the same column name returned on it
Code is below
SELECT ‘Managed Data’ as Table1,
NLPostedNominalTran.NLPostedNominalTranID, NLNominalAccount.AccountNumber, NLNominalAccount.AccountName, NLNominalAccount.AccountCostCentre, NLNominalAccount.AccountDepartment, SYSAccountingPeriod.PeriodNumber, NLPostedNominalTran.NLNominalTranTypeID, NLPostedNominalTran.TransactionDate,
[Code] ....
Hi there,
With a Union all Query is there a way to have it also generate
an Auto Increment (number) column that is appended to the Union all results
?
I have a problem with a union all that seems to be changing the results of a column based on using the union, when I run the querys separatly I get the expected results in the field!
Basically 3 queries pulled together for reporting purposes.
Orders (which can include a gift so the gifts are separated in the second query).
OrderGifts (pulled out of the orders).
Gifts (straight gifts with no associated orders).
The problem is showing up in the first ORDERS query. I can pull a specific order and the calculation for the AMOUNT(eg:$15.20) is correct, but when I combine the tables I get a different AMOUNT(eg:$15.199999999999999).
Here are the values for the fields in the amount calc:
totitems=12.9500
totcredits=.0000
discount=.0000
tax=.0000
refund=.0000
convrate=1.0
postage=2.2500
giftamt=15.0000
I tried converting each of the fields to an decimal befre the calc and same results
I tried ROUND and same thing!
I have been trying to chase this down all day, cant figure out what the problem is or how to get around it...whats going on here I am missing?
Here is the query, if you need any other info just let me know, I would GREATLY appreciate ANY direction of figuring this out!
select * from
(
--orders
select
acctnbr as PartnerId,
'O' as TrnType,
ordnbr as TrnId,
0 as FundId,
odate as WorkDate,
adate as PostDate,
sdate as ShipDate,
cast(
(
IsNull(totitems, 0) -
IsNull(totcredits, 0) -
IsNull(discount, 0) -
IsNull(tax, 0) -
IsNull(refund, 0) +
IsNull(postage, 0)
) * IsNull(convrate, 1)
as Decimal(10,2))
as Amount,
batchnbr as BatchId,
motvcode as MotivationCode,
currcode as CurrencyType,
Status,
paycode as PaymentType,
paytype as CardType,
paynbr as CardNbr,
expire as CardExpire,
ChargeAuth,
ConvRate,
MediaCode,
hcf.dbo.KmaiProjMotvTest(0,motvcode) as ProjMotvName
from kmai.dbo.o01omst
UNION all
--orders gifts
select
acctnbr as PartnerId,
'G' as TrnType,
giftref as TrnId,
giftfundid as FundId,
odate as WorkDate,
null as PostDate,
null as ShipDate,
ROUND((giftamt * IsNull(convrate, 1)),2) as Amount,
batchnbr as BatchId,
giftmotvcode as MotivationCode,
currcode as CurrencyType,
Status,
paycode as PaymentType,
paytype as CardType,
paynbr as CardNbr,
expire as CardExpire,
ChargeAuth,
ConvRate,
MediaCode,
hcf.dbo.KmaiProjMotvTest(giftfundid,giftmotvcode) as ProjMotvName
from kmai.dbo.o01omst
where adate is null
and giftfundid <> ''
UNION ALL
--gifts
select
acctnbr as PartnerId,
'G' as TrnType,
gh.giftref as TrnId,
convert(int, fundid) as FundId,
gdate as WorkDate,
applydate as PostDate,
null as ShipDate,
ROUND((IsNull(gd.amt, 0) * IsNull(convrate, 1)),2) AS Amount,
batchnbr as BatchId,
motvcode as MotivationCode,
currcode as CurrencyType,
Status,
paycode as PaymentType,
paytype as CardType,
paynbr as CardNbr,
expire as CardExpire,
ChargeAuth,
ConvRate,
MediaCode,
hcf.dbo.KmaiProjMotvTest(fundid,motvcode) as ProjMotvName
from kmai.dbo.g03ghdr gh
inner join kmai..g04gdtl gd
on gh.giftref = gd.giftref
)
UnionOfGiftsAndOrders
I have a query similar to the following, but it gives the following error:
'Invalid column name 'GroupName'.'
SELECT 'Primary' as GroupName, City
FROM PrimaryTable
UNION ALL
SELECT SpecialGroupName AS GroupName, City
FROM Table2
GROUP BY GroupName, City
GroupName is varchar(30)
Any ideas why this would fail. Thanks in advance.
Terry
Using MDS 2012: I have an entity "XYZ_Entity". In "XYZ_Entity" entity I have 2 domain based Columns "DealerGroup" and "Dealer".
While inserting information into "XYZ_Entity" entity user can select the required dealer group from domain base Dealer Group values. Now for selecting Dealer he wants the dealers to be filter based on selected dealer group and he can select from the filtered list. reason to do that is he don't want to go through thousands of dealers and select an incorrect one.
Is it possible, if yes then how?
Hi,Suppose I have a table containing monthly sales figures from my shopbranches:Branch Month Sales-----------------------London Jan 5000London Feb 4500London Mar 5200Cardiff Jan 2900Cardiff Feb 4100Cardiff Mar 3500The question I am trying to ask is this: in which month did each branchachieve its highest sales? So I want a result set something like this:Branch Month----------------London MarCardiff FebI can do a "SELECT Branch, MAX(Sales) FROM MonthlySales GROUP BY Branch" totell me what the highest monthly sales figure was, but I just can't figureout how to write a query to tell me which month corresponded to MAX(Sales).Ideas anyone?Cheers,....Andy
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have Table Like this
t_id w_id t_codew_name
358553680A1100EVM Method Project
358563680A1110EVM Method Project
358453684A1000Basic
358463684A1010Basic
358473685A1020Detail
[Code] ....
Table structure as follows
Employee
Empno empname salary
commission
I want to have an other employee table named employee_modified
Empno empname salary
commission derived_column1(salary+commission)
derived_column2(derived_column1 + xxxx) and so on derive other
columns based on the earlier derived columns)
Is that possible to do it.. or am I doing something wrong.
something like
Select empno , empname , salary , commission,
(salary + commission) as derived_colum1 ,
(derived_colum1 + xxxxx) as derived_colum2 ,
(derived_colum2 + xxxxx) as derived_colum3
into employee_modified from employee
#EMAIL_ADDRESSES which hold records similar to the following (CREATE code below):
View 6 Replies View RelatedHello All,
We all were new at one point.... any help is appreciated.
Objective:
Combining two 49,000 row tables and remove records where there is only 1 column difference. (keeping the specified column value removing the one with a blank.)
Reason:
I have 2 people going through a list, coding a specific column with a single letter value. They both have different progress on each sheet. Hence I am trying to UNION them and have a result of their combined efforts without duplicates.
My progress/where I'm stuck:
Here is my first query/union:
SELECT * FROM [Eds table]
UNION SELECT * FROM [Vickis table];
As shown above, I have unioned these 2 tables and my results removed th obvious whole record duplicates, but since 1 column is different on these, a union without criteria considers them unique.....
an example of duplicates that I must remove are as follows:
142301 - Product 5000 - 150# - S (Keep)
142031 - Product 5000 - 150# - "" <--- Blank (Remove)
I am trying to run another query on my first query results so I don't mess my first query up. Here it is:
SELECT DISTINCT [Prod #], [Prod Name], [Prod Description], [Product Type]
FROM [Combined Tables]
WHERE [Product Type]<>" ";
Please Help! Thank you in advance.
--------------------
5 minutes away from pulling my last one!
BaldNAskewed
I want to create a raw SQL resultset for outputting to Excel with some artificial headers transposed over the top of the 2nd part of the Union's column names. The first part of the Union will be the Headers. Like this, the space to the left of the topmost columns is preferably empty ....
COL 1 COL2 COL3 COL4 etc. BEH BIG BPL etc.
************************************* INTAKT DEFEKT INTAKT DEFEKT INTAKT
************************************* B E B E B
I just want the text above as a 3 line header and there won't be any values obviously. Then the 2nd query will be joined to the above with a Union all. The 2nd query has all the same column names as what will be given in the first set above. What is the SQL Syntax for doing so? Do I have to use a from clause?
I am trying to add a column to query based on the value of another column in the query.
I first tried creating a calculated field in SSRS 2008 with this statement:
=IIF(Fields!ChargeableFlag.Value=1,Fields!Negamt.Value,0)
The report runs but I get a "#ERROR" when I place the field on the report.
I next tried creating a new column with the SQL statement:
SELECT Project.ProjectCode AS PC, Project.StatusCode AS SC, Time.StandardHours AS Hours,
Time.StandardChargeAmt AS StdAmt, Time.TaskUID as UID,
Time.StandardChargeRate as Rate, ChargeableFlag, 'Bill' =
Case
When TaskRule.ChargeableFlag = 0 Then 'Non-Bill'
When TaskRule.ChargeableFlag = 1 Then 'Billable'
[Code] .....
This query, less the case statement for BLAmt creates the dataset for the SSRS. Adding the Case statement for the BLAmt produces the error: "Invalid column name 'Negamt'."
How to Update Column Value in the whole data base (based on Column Value)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedLeaveEntitlementID PeriodID LeaveType EmployeeID NumberOfDays
1 1 Annual 1 10
2 1 Annual 1 10
3 1 Sick 2 10
4 2 Sick 2 10
5 2 Sick 2 10
I have the above table (LeaveEntitlement) which has the above columns.
What I want to sum the column NumberOfDays based on EmployeeID, LeaveType and PeriodID columns as of LeaveTypeNumberOfDays.
For example sum(NumberOfDays) where PeriodID=1 and EmployeeID=1 and LeaveType=Annual
The result should be shown in new column name AnnualLeave (20)
sum(NumberOfDays) where PeriodID=1 and EmployeeID=1 and LeaveType=Sick
The result should be shown in new column name SickLeave (10)
Same all leave Types
The table should be shown as the below after executing the query
LeaveEntitlementID PeriodID EmployeeID AnnualLeave SickLeave
1 1 1 20 0
2 1 2 0 10
3 2 2 0 20
is it possible in sql server
SQL Server 2008 r2...
I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).
Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.
Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...
Query below [for reference]...
WITH cte AS (
SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum
FROM[UT_Pole] A
LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]
[Code] .....
We have SharePoint list which has, say, two columns. Column A and Column B.
Column A can have three values - red, blue & green.
Column B can have four values - pen, marker, pencil & highlighter.
A typical view of list can be:
Column A - Column B
red - pen
red - pencil
red - highlighter
blue - marker
blue - pencil
green - pen
green - highlighter
red - pen
blue - pencil
blue - highlighter
blue - pencil
We are looking to create a report from SharePoint List using SSRS which has following view:
red blue green
pen 2 0 1
marker 0 1 0
pencil 1 3 0
highlighter 1 1 1
We tried Sum but not able to display in single row.
Hi.
I'm writing a web application with VS2005 andSQL Server 2005 express edition.
I have an SQL table:
Table name:
statistics
Columns:
stat_id
firm_name
stat_month
stat_year
view_count
follow_count
percentage
When a user clicks a button, an sql query is fired which increments the view_count value by one and calculates a new percentage value from this. The query to update the percentage value doesn't work, here's the query:
UPDATE [statistics]
SET percentage = follow_count / view_count * 100
WHERE (stat_id = 15)
This code worked fine with MySQL, but since migrating to MSSql it doesn't seem to work. The data type of the percentage column is: decimal(5, 2)
Any help would be appreciated.
Why the sequence different?
select * from (
select id=3,[name]='Z'
union all select 1,'G'
union all select 2,'R'
union all select 4,'Z'
) as t
order by [name]
--result:
---------
--1 G
--2 R
--4 Z
--3 Z
select * from (
select id=3,[name]='Z'
union select 1,'G'
union all select 2,'R'
union all select 4,'Z'
) as t
order by [name]
--result:
----------
--1 G
--2 R
--3 Z--changed
--4 Z
I have two tables with the following structure:
Table 1
---------
id | Name
---------
1 | John
2 | Debbie
3 | Kim
4 | Mary
Table 2
---------
id | Name
---------
654 | John
415 | Debbie
68 | Kim
289 | Mary
Table 2 id's values are all messed up and I need to replace them so that they look exactly like in Table one, my guess is that query will have to replace value of "Id" based on the "Name" column, I hope I made myself clear.
I have this table where there is tow primary keys ,one for Year and the other for DocNumber.
In this table the DocNumber takes a number based on each year,for example in year 2008 the DocNumber should start counting from 1 and increment by one for every record,when the year changes to 2009 the DocNumber should start again from 1 until and seed by one again.
Those columns are PKs because there must be one doc Number for each year and they can not be null .
Is there any simple way to approach this in Sql Server 2005 ,or do I have to work on trigger to do so...???
Any ideas will be really appreciated.
Eng.Osman Hamad
http://arabic.aspose.com