Union Or Subquery

Mar 5, 2008

Greetings!

I have 11 tables with identical fields :

HOSTS, OS, CLASSIFICATION, SITE

The 10 tables (Table 1, 2,..10) are meant for holding data regarding the compliance for a particular attribute. For example, all assets have to follow a naming convention, if they don't follow, they are recorded in Table 1. The same way, if they have any unacceptable os, they are recorded in table 2; and so on. There are 10 such attributes which are monitored in those respective 10 tables.
The 11th table is a Master Table that has all the hosts which is the master inventory table.
How do I write a query to get a list of all the hosts that belong to any of those 10 tables which could be appearing in 1 or more of those 10 table(s).

Thanks in advance
Miky001

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Order By In Subquery + UNION

Jul 20, 2005

All,I've seen several posts regarding using UNION or UNION ALL to mashtogether two or more resultsets into a single result set, but can'tseem to find enough info here to help me answer my particularquestion.I have a stored procedure that gets the column names in a particularformat (i.e. "chassis_id"|"chassis_description"|"modify_date") as wellas actual data for a given table (in a quote-separated, pipe-delimitedmanner i.e. "1"|"description for the chassis"|"2004-09-08").I'd like to get both of these resultsets and mash them together. Thisworks, but when I need to order the second resultset (i.e. select *from chassis order by chassis_id), SQL Server returns an errorcomplaining about the chassis_id column name (invalid column name'chassis_id') in the Order By clause.From what I can tell, I'm using the UNION and Order By in correctly,but I'm not sure exactly what's wrong with it. If I take out the OrderBy, everything works great. Although I would like to be able to ordermy second resultset (in the same sproc) if possible.The actual queries I'm running are actually quite long, but here's onethat's a bit shorter to help illustrate:SELECT '"app_group_id"|"app_group_name"|"create_date"|"create_by"|"modify_date"|"modify_by"'UNION ALLSELECT + ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar,app_group_id), '') + '|'+ SUBSTRING(RTRIM(LTRIM(CONVERT(varchar, 1))), 1,0)+ '"' + ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar(1000), +REPLACE(CONVERT(nvarchar(4000),app_group_name), '"', '""')), '') +'"|'+ SUBSTRING(RTRIM(LTRIM(CONVERT(varchar, 2))), 1,0)FROM app_grouporder by app_group_idThank for any help on this./bc

View 3 Replies View Related

ORDER BY In Subquery Of A UNION Fails ???

Mar 1, 2006

Hi all,

I have the following UNION ALL statement that is my attempt to gather data for the past 5 weekdays (adding a "dummy" row for today's data).

I want the final output to end up in descending order, so for today, I would want today first, then Tuesday, then Monday, then Friday, then Thursday (provided there is data for each sequential day - if not, you get the idea, I want to select back to get the latest 5 days, most recent to oldest).

This select fails, because it doesn't like the ORDER BY in the subqueryselect
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END AS Dow, 'N/A' AS Freight
UNION ALL
(select top 4
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END as DOW,
CAST(CONVERT(int, (Freight * 100)) as VARCHAR(10)) as Freight
from Northwind.dbo.orders where employeeid = 9 order by [OrderDate] desc )

I know you can't use an ORDER BY in a subquery, UNLESS the subquery also uses a TOP n (which this one does)...but does anyone know why this isn't liking my code?

I got the select to work the way I want it to by doing the following (really UGLY) code...SELECT U.DOW, U.Freight FROM
((select
GETDATE() as [OrderDate],
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, GETDATE()) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END AS Dow, 'N/A' AS Freight )
UNION ALL
(select h.OrderDate as [OrderDate], h.DOW, h.Freight FROM
(select top 4
[OrderDate] as [OrderDate],
CASE
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Monday' THEN
'MON'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Tuesday' THEN
'TUES'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Wednesday' THEN
'WED'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Thursday' THEN
'THUR'
WHEN DATENAME(dw, [OrderDate]) = 'Friday' THEN
'FRI'
END as DOW,
CAST(CONVERT(int, (Freight * 100)) as VARCHAR(10)) as Freight
from Northwind.dbo.orders where employeeid = 9 order by [OrderDate] desc ) H)) U
order by OrderDate descbut am still confounded about why my original sub-select is rejected with such impunity.

My confusion seems likely related to understanding the set theory or basic concepts of the building of the select/Union rather than the way I am using the ORDER BY syntax, but I just can't seem to explain it to myself.

Thoughts?
Thanks!

View 14 Replies View Related

Ordering A UNION Select With Subquery

Jun 26, 2006

I have a select such as this:

select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE1
union
select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE2

Now, I want to order the result set by COLUMNS. When I try the following query, the SQL fails.

select * from
(
select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE1

union

select COLUMNS from TABLE where WHERE_CLAUSE2

) as T
order by COLUMNS

Any idea how this can be done?

Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.

Apr 26, 2008

hello friends.. I am newbie for sql server...I having a problem when executing this procedure .... ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spgetvalues]    @Uid intASBEGIN    SET NOCOUNT ON;        select                                  DATEPART(year, c.fy)as fy,                                                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1%      JRF' ) as survivorship,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like  'Gross Earnings' and ) as ytdgross,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1.5%      JRP') as totalcontrib,                                                       from    wh_contribute c                       where    c.uid=@Uid                 Order by fy Asc .....what is the wrong here??  " Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."please reply asap... 

View 1 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.

Jul 20, 2005

I am getting 2 resultsets depending on conditon, In the secondconditon i am getting the above error could anyone help me..........CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO

View 3 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I

Mar 6, 2008

I am getting an error as

Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.

while running the following query.





SELECT DISTINCT EmployeeDetails.FirstName+' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName AS EmpName,

LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.DeptName AS CurrentDepartment,

LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.DesigName AS CurrentDesignation,

LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.ProjectName AS CurrentProject,

ManagerName=(SELECT E.FirstName+' '+E.LastName

FROM EmployeeDetails E

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON E.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid = LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid

WHERE LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Managerid = E.Empid)



FROM EmployeeDetails

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDepartment

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DeptDetails

ON LUP_EmpDepartment.Deptid=LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.Deptid

AND LUP_EmpDepartment.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDepartment.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDepartment

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDepartment.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDesignation

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DesigDetails

ON LUP_EmpDesignation.Desigid=LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.Desigid

AND LUP_EmpDesignation.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDesignation.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDesignation

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDesignation.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

AND LUP_EmpProject.StartDate=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpProject.StartDate

FROM LUP_EmpProject

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpProject.StartDate DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid=LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid



WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=1

PLEASE HELP.................

View 1 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I

May 14, 2008

Hi,

I've running the below query for months ans suddenly today started getting the following error :"Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."

Any ideas as to why??

SELECT t0.DocNum, t0.Status, t0.ItemCode, t0.Warehouse, t0.OriginNum, t0.U_SOLineNo, ORDR.NumAtCard, ORDR.CardCode, OITM_1.U_Cultivar,
RDR1.U_Variety,
(SELECT OITM.U_Variety
FROM OWOR INNER JOIN
WOR1 ON OWOR.DocEntry = WOR1.DocEntry INNER JOIN
OITM INNER JOIN
OITB ON OITM.ItmsGrpCod = OITB.ItmsGrpCod ON WOR1.ItemCode = OITM.ItemCode
WHERE (OITB.ItmsGrpNam = 'Basic Fruit') AND (OWOR.DocNum = t0.DocNum)) AS Expr1, OITM_1.U_Organisation, OITM_1.U_Commodity,
OITM_1.U_Pack, OITM_1.U_Grade, RDR1.U_SizeCount, OITM_1.U_InvCode, OITM_1.U_Brand, OITM_1.U_PalleBase, OITM_1.U_Crt_Pallet,
OITM_1.U_LabelType, RDR1.U_DEPOT, OITM_1.U_PLU, RDR1.U_Trgt_Mrkt, RDR1.U_Wrap_Type, ORDR.U_SCCode
FROM OWOR AS t0 INNER JOIN
ORDR ON t0.OriginNum = ORDR.DocNum INNER JOIN
RDR1 ON ORDR.DocEntry = RDR1.DocEntry AND t0.U_SOLineNo - 1 = RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN
OITM AS OITM_1 ON t0.ItemCode = OITM_1.ItemCode
WHERE (t0.Status <> 'L')

Thanks

Jacquues

View 4 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Using Union ALL Or Union Kills Performance On Stored Proc

Jun 12, 2014

SQL Server 2008 r2...

I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).

Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.

Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...

Query below [for reference]...

WITH cte AS (
SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum
FROM[UT_Pole] A
LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]

[Code] .....

View 4 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value But Work FINE (field_xxx=subquery)

Jul 19, 2007

Hi guys,



A have a problem that I need understand.... I have 2 server with the same configuration...



SERVER01:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)



sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics

********************************

SERVER02:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)



sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics



OK, the problem is that if a run the below query in server01, i get error 512:



Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.



But, if run the same query in the server02, the query work fine -.



I know that I can use IN, EXISTS, TOP, etc ... but I need understand this behavior.



Any idea WHY?



SELECT dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_movimento ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_header,

'SD' ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente,

0 vl_entrada_compra_ctro ,0 vl_entrada_compra_premio,

0 vl_entrada_venda_ctro , 0 vl_entrada_venda_premio,

0 vl_saida_compra_ctro, 0 vl_saida_compra_premio,

0 vl_saida_venda_ctro, 0 vl_saida_venda_premio,

0 vl_lucro , 0 vl_prejuizo, 0 vl_naoexec_contrato,

0 vl_naoexec_premio,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_ganho) vl_aprop_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_perda) vl_aprop_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_ganho) vl_rever_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_perda) vl_rever_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_irrf) vl_irrf

FROM dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx,

dbo.opf_header_operacao ,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao

WHERE dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo = '6-29-2007 0:0:0.000'

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.dt_pregao = (select (o.dt_pregao) from dbo.opf_movimento_operacao o

where o.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato and o.dt_pregao <='6-28-2007 0:0:0.000' ) )

and (dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_tipo_saldo = 'S')

group by dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ,

ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente



Thanks

Nilton Pinheiro

View 9 Replies View Related

How Does Union/union All Work Inside SQL Server?

Apr 29, 2008



Why the sequence different?



select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union all select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

---------

--1 G

--2 R

--4 Z

--3 Z

select * from (

select id=3,[name]='Z'

union select 1,'G'

union all select 2,'R'

union all select 4,'Z'

) as t

order by [name]

--result:

----------

--1 G

--2 R

--3 Z--changed

--4 Z

View 3 Replies View Related

Adding Product Of A Subquery To A Subquery Fails?

Jul 6, 2014

I am trying to add the results of both of these queries together:

The purpose of the first query is to find the number of nulls in the TimeZone column.

Query 1:

SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename

The purpose of the second query is to find results in the AAST, AST, etc timezones.

Query 2:

SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')

Note: both queries produce a whole number with no decimals. Ran individually both queries produce accurate results. However, what I would like is one query which produced a single INT by adding both results together. For example, if Query 1 results to 5 and query 2 results to 10, I would like to see a single result of 15 as the output.

What I came up with (from research) is:

SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST'))

I get a msq 102, level 15, state 1 error.

I also tried

SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')) as IVR_HI_n_AK_results

but I still get an error. For the exact details see:

[URL]

NOTE: the table in query 1 and query 2 are the same table. I am using T-SQL in SQL Server Management Studio 2008.

View 6 Replies View Related

Union All Does Not Union All Rows

Nov 6, 2006

Hi all,

I have a Union All transformation with 4 inputs and one output when I debug the package the sum of the different inputs rows does not match the row count in output.

I don't understand, I've used the Union All transform many times and I've never seen this.

Any idea why this could happen ?

View 18 Replies View Related

DTS - UNION

Jan 23, 2001

Hi,

I am using DTS to import data where the query involves the UNION .

Select a,z,y from x
UNION
select b,z,y from y;

Only the columns Z,y appearing in the output. Is there any known problem with UNION in DTS?

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Union -- Union All

Dec 3, 2004

Help me again . :) ..
Query :

Select 1 AS ColA, ColB,ColC
FROM Table1
Where ColA = 1
Union
Select 2 AS ColA, ColB,ColC
FROM Table1
Where ColA = 2

Expected Result.
ColA ColB ColC
1 Apple Sweet
1 Wine Alcohol
2 Home Nice
2 Travel Fun

But gives
ColA ColB ColC
1 Apple Sweet
1 Wine Alcohol
1 Home Nice
1 Travel Fun

any suggestions .please reply.

View 1 Replies View Related

Union In MDX

Mar 23, 2007

Could someone explain me Union function in MDX? How is different from the T-SQL Union?

My need is urgent.

View 1 Replies View Related

Union

Jul 12, 2004

i have a table with country names

table name:country
column name:country
it is populated with:
UK
USA
africa
asia
japan

i want a query which gives the foll output
USA
UK
africa
asia
japan


(i.e) USA and UK must be on the top 2 rows
while the rest of the countries should come below these 2 and sorted in the ascending order.

if it is possible with any other query also it is ok

View 1 Replies View Related

Use TOP With UNION

Jul 14, 2004

Hi

I just found out that I can do an ORDER BY clause on entire records set retrieve from a query that combines several sub queries with UNION from different tables with the same structure... so this is great to know, BTW, is this a new feature of MSSQL 2K ? I don't recall being able to do this in MSSQL 7 or 6.5.

Anyway, the main question is, can I use the TOP command in a query that has UNION in it?? Meaning, there are two queries (or more) from two tables (or more) and I need to fetch the top 10 records by an ORDER BY clause from the combined results, when I try to add each sub query TOP 10 the results are not correct at all, when I try to add TOP 10 only to the first query hoping that the analyzer will refer to the whole query, it's selecting TOP 10 from the first query and combines it with all the records from the others...

So, can anyone help? I hope the problem is understood.

Thank you,
Inon.

View 2 Replies View Related

Need Help With UNION And SUM

Nov 8, 2004

Hi!

I am trying to join to different queries into one table ( I accomplished this)

Next I need to ADD or SUM the results of 2 rows to form a single row.

As you can see in the query below, I run 2 separate queries and use ' ' as a place holder for the UNION to work. I get duplicate rows, one with a value and the other with a '0'. I want to have a single row.

Any help is greatly appreciated!

(SELECT
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name',
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site',
Count(ProdID0) as '# copies installed',
'' as '# legitimate copies installed'

FROM
v_R_System SYS,
v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN,
v_gs_SupportedPackages
inner join
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID

WHERE
SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId
AND
SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId
AND
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60)

GROUP BY

v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0,
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 )

UNION

(SELECT
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 as 'Product Name',
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 as 'Site',
'' as '# copies installed',
Count(ProdID0) as '# legitimate copies installed'

FROM
v_R_System SYS,
v_GS_Workstation_Status HWSCAN,
v_gs_SupportedPackages
inner join
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites on v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.ResourceID = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceID

WHERE
SYS.ResourceId = HWSCAN.ResourceId
AND
SYS.ResourceId = v_gs_SupportedPackages.ResourceId
AND
v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0 = substring('MS Security Patch MS04-030,031,032,034,037,038',1,60)
AND
DateDiff(Day,HWSCAN.LastHWScan,GetDate()) <= '20'

GROUP BY

v_gs_supportedpackages.ProdID0,
v_RA_System_SMSInstalledSites.SMS_Installed_Sites0 )

View 4 Replies View Related

UNION Vs UNION ALL

Dec 15, 2006

Just a pet peeve....

From BOL:


By default, the UNION operator removes duplicate rows from the result set.
If you use ALL, all rows are included in the results and duplicates are not
removed.



Why is it assumed that one would want the duplicates removed by default?
Isn't that what SELECT DISINCT is for?

View 1 Replies View Related

Union

Mar 18, 2004

I was wondering if there is a way I could write this query as one query using union instead of 3 different queries?

SELECT columna as column,count(ID) as Applications
FROM tablea
GROUP columna


SELECT columna as column2, count(ID) as Approved
FROM tablesa where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and in 'Approved')
GROUP BY columna

SELECT columna as column3, count(ID) as Booked, sum(AMT) as amt, sum(AMT)/count(ID) as lavg
from tablea where substring(APP_DATE,1,6) >'200304' and STATUS in('book')
group by columna

View 2 Replies View Related

UNION Vs UNION ALL

Apr 22, 2008

Hi All,

I am doing a UNION of 8 views(with 3 million rows in each view approx). I am sure that there is NO DUPLICATE data between the views. SO specifying a UNION ALL would be better than specifying a UNION in this case?

Thanks!

Prakash.P
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources!

View 8 Replies View Related

Union

Jun 20, 2008

Hi folks,
I have a question about the performance of the following query:

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
)
union

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
) union

(SELECT name, lastName
from Data
where salary >= 2200
)

How that query works? Is it slow for a larger data? Does it do 3 queries and then combine them?

Thank you.

View 3 Replies View Related

Union

Feb 11, 2008

Hi All
I want to do the following report and I want the 2nd select statement to appear at the bottom to display the totals


SELECT Item,B.Mar, B.Apr, B.May, B.Jun,B.Jul, B.Aug, B.Sep, B.Oct, B.Nov, B.Dec, B.Jan
FROM fncWineSales(2007) AS A
UNION
SELECT 'Total',SUM(B.Mar), SUM(B.Apr), SUM(B.May), SUM(B.Jun),SUM(B.Jul), SUM(B.Aug), SUM(B.Sep), SUM(B.Oct), SUM(B.Nov), SUM(B.Dec), SUM(B.Jan)
FROM dbo.fncWineSales (2007) AS B


thanx in advance

View 11 Replies View Related

Other Than UNION

Jul 23, 2005

Hello,Bear with me (not had much sleep last night), pls see following ddl,dml and comments for what is desired, I don't have a problem gettingdesired result(s), however, I'm wondering if there's another (better)solution than UNION operator in this case. TIA.-- DDLCREATE TABLE #TMP (col varchar(10));-- DMLinsert into #TMPvalues('A124');insert into #TMPvalues('A127');insert into #TMPvalues('A12728');insert into #TMPvalues('A17282');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('BCD');insert into #TMPvalues('CDSS');insert into #TMPvalues('DS');insert into #TMPvalues('YUUEI');-- goal: get one row with col data starting with 'A' and distict rowsfor the restselect top 1 colfrom #TMPwhere col LIKE 'A%'UNIONselect distinct colfrom #TMPwhere col NOT LIKE 'A%'

View 4 Replies View Related

Sum A Union

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,I can return results of a union easily enough, but I wish to sum the recordsfirst. Is this possible in a single SQL statement? Or do I have to useseparate ones to sum up after the union?Cheers,Chris

View 2 Replies View Related

T-SQL UNION With Sum

Aug 20, 2007

Why if run this script, Always Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'group'.
somebody helpme, how to sum the union script

SELECT NUMMSTR3, sum(qty), sum (AP)
FROM (

SELECT c.NUMMSTR3, count(*) qty,sum(a.DEBIT) DEBIT,sum(a.CRDT) CRDT,Sum(a.CRDT - a.DEBIT) AP

FROM MSTR1 a,MSTR2 b,MSTR3 c

where a.IDMSTR1 = b.IDMSTR1

and a.KDMSTR1 = c.KDMSTR3

and c.NUMMSTR3 = '21010100'

and year(b.TRXDATE) <= '2007'

group by c.NUMMSTR3
UNION ALL

SELECT c.NUMMSTR3, count(*) jml,sum(a.DEBIT) DEBIT,sum(a.CRDT) CRDT,Sum(a.CRDT - a.DEBIT) AP

FROM HISTR4 d,MSTR3 c

where d.KDHISTR4 = c.KDMSTR3

and c.NUMMSTR3 = '21010100'

group by c.NUMMSTR3
) group by NUMMSTR3

View 5 Replies View Related

UNION

Jul 5, 2006

Of the two queries below, the first returns the desired result, the union of the select-except statments.  Why doesn't the second query return the same result as the first? Is this a mistake/bug on Microsofts side?

 

select * from

(select * from TEST1

EXCEPT

select * from TEST2) AS A

UNION

select * from (select * from TEST2

EXCEPT

select * from TEST1) AS B

 

 

 

select * from TEST1

EXCEPT

select * from TEST2

UNION

select * from TEST2

EXCEPT

select * from TEST1

View 3 Replies View Related

Union All

Sep 3, 2006

When any changes have been made to the underlying table structure, the Union all reports error and does not automatically correct the error. I then have to delete it and recreate it. Is this a bug?

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Union With SUM

Apr 22, 2008

hi need help
i have tow tables
no primary key
evry table only one ROW

tb1

fld1 fld2 fld3 fld4 fld5 fld6
---------------------------------------

2 4 5 6 7 8

tb2

fld1 fld2 fld3 fld4 fld5 fld6
---------------------------------------
6 1 2 4 1 9


i need to summing the tow table like this (evry table only one ROW)


view_SUM (summing)

fld1 fld2 fld3 fld4 fld5 fld6
---------------------------------------
8 5 7 10 8 17


how to do

select * from tb1

union all --------------SUM ?
select * from tb2
TNX

View 1 Replies View Related

Help With UNION

Feb 27, 2008

Hello all can anybody help me out with this one?

These are the errors that I am getting. The 2nd error only comes up when I try to put in "UNION". Any help would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure searchUser, Line 79
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'.

Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Procedure searchUser, Line 100
Incorrect syntax near 'END'.





Code Snippet

set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[searchUser]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here

@Username VARCHAR(25),
@AppID INT,
@ResID INT,
@Access VARCHAR(5),
@Region INT
AS
BEGIN

IF @Username IS NULL
BEGIN

IF @Access IS NULL
BEGIN
PRINT 1
SELECT a.XID, a.AppID, a.ResID,
b.AppDescription,
c.ResDescription,
d.Username, d.Custom, d.Region

FROM [Application] a INNER JOIN ApplicationName b
ON a.AppID = b.AppID LEFT JOIN ResTable c
ON a.ResID = c.ResID LEFT JOIN AppResCustom d
ON a.XID = d.XID

WHERE a.AppID = @AppID
AND a.ResID = @ResID
END

ELSE
BEGIN
PRINT 2
SELECT a.XID, a.AppID, a.ResID,
b.AppDescription,
c.ResDescription,
d.Username, d.Custom, d.Region

FROM [Application] a INNER JOIN ApplicationName b
ON a.AppID = b.AppID LEFT JOIN ResTable c
ON a.ResID = c.ResID LEFT JOIN AppResCustom d
ON a.XID = d.XID

WHERE a.AppID = @AppID
AND a.ResID = @ResID
AND d.Custom = @Access
END

END

ELSE
BEGIN
PRINT 3
SELECT a.XID, a.AppID, a.ResID,
b.AppDescription,
c.ResDescription,
d.Username, d.Custom, d.Region

FROM [Application] a INNER JOIN ApplicationName b
ON a.AppID = b.AppID LEFT JOIN ResTable c
ON a.ResID = c.ResID LEFT JOIN AppResCustom d
ON a.XID = d.XID

WHERE d.Username = @Username
AND a.AppID = @AppID
AND a.ResID = @ResID
AND d.Custom = @Access

END

UNION

PRINT 4
SELECT a.XID, a.AppID, a.ResID,
b.AppDescription,
c.ResDescription,
d.Username, d.Custom, d.Region

FROM [Application] a INNER JOIN ApplicationName b
ON a.AppID = b.AppID LEFT JOIN ResTable c
ON a.ResID = c.ResID LEFT JOIN AppResCustom d
ON a.XID = d.XID

WHERE d.Username = @Username
AND a.AppID = @AppID
AND a.ResID = @ResID
AND d.Custom = @Access
AND d.Region = @Region

END

View 4 Replies View Related

Top 5 With Union.

Jun 1, 2006

I want to know the top 5 patterns in sales, the report will like this:

Month Top1 Top2 Top3 Top4 Top5

2005-06 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5

2005-07 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5

2005-08 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

--- --- ---

What I did is:

declare @StartDate and @EndDate, set @StartDate and @EndDate

Delete AAAA (AAAA is a table)

Begin

While (@EndDate<somedate)

Insert into AAAA(sales, Month, Pattern)

Select TOP 5 sales, Month,pattern from sometables order by sales DESC

increase @StartDate and @EndDate by a month

End

Select * from AAAA



It works fine. My question is: Can I get rid of table AAAA? Is there a better way that just use Top 5 combine with something say Union? ( I tried Union and failed )

Thanks in advance,

Long

View 4 Replies View Related

Union All Bug In SP0

Dec 28, 2007



Hi All,

Pls look at the following:



http://blogs.conchango.com/jamiethomson/archive/2006/07/10/SSIS_3A00_-MULTICAST-bug.aspx

The first comment, by 'zpeceno', exactly describes a problem that I have hit upon.
However despite looking thro the list of issues resolved in SP1, I've found no mention of it.
Any chance I could get some offical comment re. the bug described, when it was(/has it been?) officially acknowledged, and what service pack (if any) resolves it?


Many thanks,

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved