I created a view that joins two tables (tblOrder and tblProduct). The field
ProductID is common to both. When I save the View I get the following error
message: "Column names in each view must be unique." Is there a way around
that? Should I be naming my Key Fields and Foreign Key fields differently?
I'm new to MS-SQL. Thanks for your help.
Louis
I get this message when doing an insert into :
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 1, Line 1
Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.ElementLocalCharacterised' with unique index 'ElementLocalCharacterised_uq'.
The statement has been terminated.
Now my question is : does this error mean that all inserts are done, despite those where the unique key produced a conflict? Or does it mean that none of the inserts are done (all are rejected because at least one gave a conflict) ?
If the second is the case I would like to know if it is possible to execute the insert into in a way that all inserts are done despite those that raise a conflict?
Thanks a lot for any suggestion !
Regards,
Fabianus
my favorit hoster is ASPnix : www.aspnix.com !
We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4
ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion
How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise
I have to create a unique id in a view, How to achive this....Please help
View 8 Replies View RelatedWe are on SQL 2014...we have a bunch of views in a database where we are trying to find the views which have more than 16 columns max for unique index/constraint...this is needed so we can convert them to indexed views...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a bit field only alow one row as 1 all other rows should always 0.
How can I control that -- trigger or constraint?? How?
I have a database table with a primary key that auto-increments - using MS SQL Server 2000.
However I have another field (standard field) that must not allow duplicates.
Besides writing code to sift through the database every time to check for duplicates (which would take long to search through the db every time), is there any setting in MS SQL Server 2000 that allows for an automatic check for duplication and will prevent duplicates!??
I have a database table with a primary key that auto-increments - using MS SQL Server 2000.
However I have another field (standard field) that must not allow duplicates.
Besides writing code to sift through the database every time to check for duplicates (which would take long to search through the db every time), is there any setting in MS SQL Server 2000 that allows for an automatic check for duplication and will prevent duplicates!??
Here's an example of what I mean...
PK Entry_Sheet Cust_Id Date
1 62345 cust1 16/11/2004
2 45663 cust6 16/11/2004
3 82917 cust1 16/11/2004
4 19283 cust2 17/11/2004
5 28764 cust2 18/11/2004
I have everything created, with data already in the table. What I need now is some way to prevent duplicates from occurring.
The Entry_Sheet value needs to be unique. Instead of writing code to run through the entire db each time an insert is performed, is there a simpler way using a SQL Server DB!??
I have built a table called Visit_Fact, which is detailed medical data. Within this table I have to create several index fields.
Well one of the fields ([Diag Code]) that should be included will have null values.
Well in Access I was able to build my new field called IndKey which has the following SQL statement:
IndKey: [PracticeCode]&[Physician Code]&[Chart #]&[Visit #]&[InsCoNum]&[CPT]&[Modifier]&[Units]&[Diag Code]
1. Example data with Diag Code = null
ABCD1234ABCDEF1234567MEDI19921301
2. Example data with Diag Code <> null
ABCD1234ABCDEF1234567MEDI19921301708.1
This runs fine in Access and if the Diag Code is null, Access does not care, it still puts all the other information together. Such as the examples above.
Well I tried doing this in a Stored Procedure and when I ran across a record that had a null value for the [Diag Code] it made the IndKey field Null for that record. If it was not null then it looked like Example 2.
What is the proper way of creating my unique field in SQL Server?
I have a table where the key is an autonumber. I also have a field which holds the reference of a room eg 0BM1. It is nvarchar. Is there a way I can set this field to duplicates = No, so that my user cannot enter the same room reference more than once. Or do I have to do this check in my asp.net code ?
TIA
Hello,
I would like to store some frequently asked questions in a database.
As those questions/answers could be translated in several languages, I was thinking of using two tables :
The first table would contain a unique field : the key wich is an id for each faq.
The second table would contain those fields :
FAQ_ID : foreign key
LANG : language
QUESTION : the question translated in the good language.
ANSWER : the answer translated in the good language.
What I find embarrassing, is that first table just contains a unique field : the id. But it allows :
- to have a table in which a line correspond to an object. It is convenient for object relational mapping.
- it is more evolutionary. If, in the future, I have to add some statistics that concerns a faq, I will have the possibility to store them in the first table, avoiding in this way to duplicate data.
But, one more time, I find a bit embarrassing having a table with a unique field...
What is your opinion about that ?
Thank you in advance for any suggestion.
mathmax
Is it possible to have the field as a unique key and a optional one?It is like.. for example, office code has to be unique (cannot beduplicated with the same code) and it could be null too.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHI Friends,
Can anybody help in this prob with SQL server Enterprise Manager
Prob:
I cannot use alias name spelled same as the table field-name, in a view. For eg:
SELECT Name AS name
FROM dbo.test
if I take this view in the design view in Enterprise Manager, it will changed to:
SELECT Name
FROM dbo.test
Can anybody help me How can I avoid this???? I need the same alias name with different case....
Nish
I need to to have a table that has a counter field (used to generate an id code for a record). This is not the primary id for the field but just a counter to label a record in another table, similar to a registration code for an event. This is a sequential counter that will start 1 and go up on each new record inserted into other tables. What I want to do is be able to query this counter table to get the next valid number and increment the count for the next time. This is a multi user web app so needs to prevent duplicate use of same number.How best should this be handled? A transaction to query and update the field?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a table in Access 2007 that has about 30 field names and I want to have a count of how many unique rows there are in each field. I want to have these results put into another table that will just have the field name and then the count of how many unique rows there are.
I have code in VBA that will loop through my SQL and change out the field name, but I can't seem to get the SQL right before I can start looping it. For just one field name this would be what I have to count the unique names...
So far I have this:
INSERT INTO newtable
COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT Raw_Table.FieldName, COUNT(Raw_Table.FieldName) AS CountOfFieldName
FROM Raw_Table
GROUP BY Raw_Table.FieldName);
And its not going too well.
SQL 2000 Enterprise Manager won’t let me drop a unique key index and move it to another field. I get an error regarding ‘drop index not allowed because of unique key constraint enforcement.
Is there anyway to change fields for unique keys in SQL Enterprise Manager?
Thanks, Al
hello guys,
I have one table which is using to keep 10 difference type of serial number (that mean i got 10 column in the table). Is there any way to do unique key checking (individually, not combine) on these 10 serial number without sacrify the performance?
thank you.
Our phone system keeps a list of events, such as login and logout, which I'm doing a self join on to get the start and end times so I can calculate the time between the start and end of each event during a time period.
Then I stuffed the self joins into a couple views for the events I'm interested in...
The problem is that this makes the "end time" a calculated field, so when I use it as part of the filter it takes forever. I need to account for events ending within the time period, and events starting within the time period... so I need to filter on both the start and end time in the initial select. Filtering the start time first in a subselect, then the end time in the main select is quick but can lose things that started before the start time.
So how can I speed up the filtering on that calculated column?
Or am I going to have to get really creative with unions?
While creating a view in SQl Server 2005 Management Studio Or Interation Services on a SQL Server 2000 database using "*" something very strange happens. Has anyone every seen this happen before?
The new view is created something like the following:
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[new_view]
AS
SELECT *
FROM Table1
GO
However, when right-clicking on the new view, and choosing "Design", the SELECT scrambles the field names with aliases of the other field names. When the view is run, the result set is incorrect. It may look something like the following:
SELECT
Field1,
Field2 AS Field3,
Field3 AS Field4,
Field4 AS Field5,
.
.
.
From Table1
GO
I am in a situation where I need to find out unique field names with different values in a table having 200+ columns.
Let's say I have two rows with 200+ columns ( I exported these rows from Lotus Notes to SQL Server) I am not sure what columns makes unique of these rows. It's going to be tedious by checking each column values.
Is there anyway I can write a squl query on these two rows which outputs column names which are having unique values.
I would appreciate If anybody gives me hint about achieving desired result
I have created a view based on joining 3 tables, however, it is not possible to have a unique field in the view which I must need it and I must create index on some other fields. Is there any way to create sequence number or uniqie field in mssql view.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am working on a software primarily related to accounting with visual basic
Many of the problems and proposed several solutions for running sum, but I have read almost all of these interpretations,
have applied when running sum is a unique ID field. but almost all of the functioning of accounting reports are in chronological order. So he questioned what was the balance on 05.05.2012.
ID of the process is done, if the user enters a process backward a few things since then, the transaction date is old, but the ID is new, are experiencing problems. eg
ID DATE DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE
1 02.02.2012 100.00 0.00 100.00
6 04.04.2012 0.00 150.00 -50.00
3 02.05.2012 70.00 0.00 20.00
4 02.05.2012 80.00 0.00 100.00
2 06.06.2012 120.00 0.00 220.00
must balance the figure above.
if ID = 2 record, the record date 06/06/2012 and if the ID = 6, date 04/04/2012, the date the order is made if the listing is experiencing trouble getting balance. 2 records in the same day when the balance at worst formula breaks down. The big point is that I hang out in my project.
the only solution is to use a temporary table or writing about it in Visual Basic seems to calculate. the use of temporary table is not a solution, but unfortunately also very fast.
I have a very large CSV file containing name-and-address information which I am reading in a Visual Basic project using the Microsoft.JetOLEDB.4.0 provider.
The key field on which the CSV file is to be filtered is the PostCode field. This is a UK-format PostCode "XXnn Nxx" where "XX" is one or more letters denoting a geographical area within the UK and "nn" is one or more characters (starting with at least one numeric digit) which when combined with the area code denotes a specific district within the geographical area. My aim is to identify all the unique UK postal districts held within my address CSV file.
Because I do not know how to use SQL to filter on the partial contents of a database field I am presently reduced to extracting unique full PostCodes using "SELECT DISTINCT PostCode,City,County FROM [ADDRESSES.csv]" into a DataTable object, then sequentially reading that DataTable using the operation of a dictionary object to identify unique PostCode areas, to finally construct the DataTable I need.
Is it possible in SQL to select records where the value of a varying number of characters before a space character in a given (PostCode) field is unique?
I'm new to MS SQL and VB. I have a table with one field JOB_NAME containing 20 records. Out of that field I want to retrieve 6 of the 20 records into a pulldown menu. They are all unique text names like so:
Anna Smith
John Doe
etc. I did not see IDs listed for any of the names in the table when I looked.
There is no common denominator to the names that can be filtered in the SELECT statement, and the 6 that I want will need to be pulled out individually.
Is there a way to do this with a SELECT statement? I have not found much information about how to extract unique records out of a single field. Here's the statement I'm using which pulls all of them:
strSQL = "SELECT DISTINCT JOB_NAME AS Names FROM [WORKER_NAMES] WHERE JOB_NAME<>' ' ORDER BY JOB_NAME ASC"
This gives me the total list but I only want to bring back 6 of the 20 for the pulldown.
Is there a way to modify this statement to pull only the records that I want?
Thanks for any help you can give.
AJ
So for years I was using the int identity(1,1) primary_key for all the tables I created, and then in this project I decided, you know, I like the uniqueidentifier using newsequentialid() to ensure a distinctly unique primary key.
then, after working with the php sqlsrv driver, I realized huh, no matter what, i am unable to retrieve the scope_identity() of the insert
So of course I cruised back to the MSSMS and realized crap, I can't even make the uniqueidentifier an identity.
So now I'm wondering 2 things...
1: Can I short cut and pull the uniqueidentifier of a newly inserted record, even though the scope_identity() will return null or
2: do I now have to add a column to each table, keep the uniqueidentifier (as all my tables are unified by that relationship) and also add a pk field as an int identity(1,1) primary_key, in order to be able to pull the scope_identity() on insert...
I have a list of movies that show throughout the year. I would like to assign a unique numeric identifier to each text field.
I have provided some sample data with the output I would like. The Movie_ID in the sample data is just made up, feel free to assign any numeric identifier, preferably of the same length but not a necessity.
create table dbo.Movie_Pre_Fix
(
Report_Monthint,
IDint,
Movie_NameVarchar(50)
);
insert into dbo.Movie_Pre_Fix (Report_Month, ID,Movie_Name)
VALUES
(201406,0721312144,'SAW'),
[code]....
I ran into an interesting situation. I'm working on contract and was looking at creating an ERD for an existing database when I ran into a problem. I found FK's that are referencing columns that do not have a unique constraint or a unique index.
I don't know the history of the database but was there a time in SQL Server history where this would have been possible? I scripted out the tables and created it in a test database. When I run the script to create the FK I get the following message.
I double checked the original tables and this FK does exist in table1 and there is no unique anything in the referenced table, table2. Currently the database is running on SQL Server 2008 Ent.
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[table1] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_table1] FOREIGN KEY([Col1])
REFERENCES [dbo].[table2] ([col2])
There are no primary or candidate keys in the referenced table 'dbo.table2' that match the referencing column list in the foreign key 'FK_table1'.
I have the following query:
Select p.Id [SenderId], p.Username, up.PhotoId,
CASE
WHEN mr.ReadDate is null then 1 -- New message
ELSE 0 -- Message has been read
END AS NewMessage,
p.LastLoggedIn, p.LoggedIn
[Code] ....
The above query returns me all messages (inbox functionality) that have been sent to mr.ReceipientId, the issue I have is when I send another email to the recipient the readdate field will be null, and the other emails linked to the recipient which have also been sent via me will have a readdate date. This causes duplicate rows to appear due to the case statement, I'm trying to figure out if / how it is possible to only display the one row per conversation and set newmessage to 1 if there is an un-read message otherwise show 0 ?
So instead of showing this:
2Person102015-07-26 17:07:24.9370
2Person112015-07-26 17:07:24.9370
I'm trying to get it to look like this:
2Person112015-07-26 17:07:24.9370
Or if we have no new mail (read date is not null) then it will appear like this, and I can confirm when there is no new mail it works as expected.
2Person102015-07-26 17:07:24.9370
I have a field I am trying to bring into a SQL statement
,ISNULL(Convert(nvarchar(50),OPP1.OriginatingLeadId),'') AS 'OriginatingLeadId'
I get this error message
Conversion failed when converting from a character string to uniqueidentifier.
the field specs' originatingleadid is attached ....
I have a comma separated field containing numerous 2 digit numbers that I would like splitting out by a corresponding unique code held in another field on the same row.
E.g
Unique Code Comma Separated Field
14587934 1,5,17,18,19,40,51,62,70
6998468 10,45,62,18,19
79585264 1,5,18
These needs to be in column format or held in an array to be used as conditional criteria.
Unique Code Comma Separated Value
79585264 1
79585264 5
79585264 18
Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI would like to create a procedure which create views by taking parameters the table name and a field value (@Dist).
However I still receive the must declare the scalar variable "@Dist" error message although I use .sp_executesql for executing the particularized query.
Below code.
ALTER Procedure [dbo].[sp_ViewCreate]
/* Input Parameters */
@TableName Varchar(20),
@Dist Varchar(20)
AS
Declare @SQLQuery AS NVarchar(4000)
Declare @ParamDefinition AS NVarchar(2000)
[code]....
I am having issues trying to write a query that would provide me the unique GUID numbers associated with a distinct PID if the unique GUID's > 1. To summarize, I need a query that just shows which PID's have more than one unique GUID. A PID could have multiple GUID's that are the same, I'm looking for the PID's that have multiple GUID's that are different/unique.
Table1
GUID PID
GUID1 PID1
GUID1 PID1
GUID1 PID1
GUID2 PID1
GUID3 PID2
GUID3 PID2
GUID3 PID2
The result of the query would only have PID1 because it has two unique GUID's. PID2 would not be listed has it has the same GUID3 in each row.
Result:
PID1