Update Statement Performance Problem
May 8, 2006
Hi,
I have an UPDATE statement which runs very slow (about 1-2 minutes) in
Web as well as in Query Analyzer. Very plain UPDATE statement; uses
indexes, etc. I though the reason might be the table being unorganized
because of the row expansions due to updating an existing column value
with a larger value. Therefore, I ran a maintanenance plan which
reorganizes data and rebuilds indexes. But, it seems that there is no
improvement.
Any thought or advise will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Pelin Bali.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 20, 2005
hiFor an unavoidable reason, I have to use row-by-row processing(update) on a temporary table to update a history table every day.I have around 60,000 records in temporary table and about 2 million inthe history table.Could any one please suggest different methods to imporve the runtimeof the query?Would highly appreciate!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Below is a simple UPDATE that I have to perform on a table that hasabout 2.5 million rows (about 4 million in production) This queryruns for an enourmous amount of time (over 1 hour). Both theChangerRoleID and the ChangerID are indexed (not unique). Is thereany way to performance tune this?Controlling the physical drive of the log file isn't possible at ourclient sites (we don't have control) and the recovery model needs tobe set to "Full".UPDATE CLIENTSHISTORY SET ChangerRoleID = ChangerID WHEREChangerRoleID IS NULLAny Help would be greatly appreciated!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2013
I need to figure out the correct update statement syntax for the following integration.
I have a "Performance Table" which i insert weekly performance numbers into for each store. The table is constructed w/ columns such as Store, Weekenddate, Sales, Refunds, #ofPatients
In a "Averages Table" i have every weekenddate for each store populated. So 52 Weeks for 10 stores = 520 Rows of Store numbers & WeekendDates.
What i would like to do is run a loop or update statement which would update the store average for each weekendate based on the last 13 weeks.
This is my query
update performancestore_avgs set SalesAvg =
(select sum(SalesHit)/Count(Store) from performance_store where performance_store.weekenddate >= performancestore_avgs.weekenddate-84 and performancestore_Avgs.store = performance_store.store)
The update statement runs but the averages are completely wrong.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
I am currently having this problem with gridview and detailview. When I drag either onto the page and set my select statement to pick from one table and then update that data through the gridview (lets say), the update works perfectly. My problem is that the table I am pulling data from is mainly foreign keys. So in order to hide the number values of the foreign keys, I select the string value columns from the tables that contain the primary keys. I then use INNER JOIN in my SELECT so that I only get the data that pertains to the user I am looking to list and edit. I run the "test query" and everything I need shows up as I want it. I then go back to the gridview and change the fields which are foreign keys to templates. When I edit the templates I bind the field that contains the string value of the given foreign key to the template. This works great, because now the user will see string representation instead of the ID numbers that coinside with the string value. So I run my webpage and everything show up as I want it to, all the data is correct and I get no errors. I then click edit (as I have checked the "enable editing" box) and the gridview changes to edit mode. I make my changes and then select "update." When the page refreshes, and the gridview returns, the data is not updated and the original data is shown. I am sorry for so much typing, but I want to be as clear as possible with what I am doing. The only thing I can see being the issue is that when I setup my SELECT and FROM to contain fields from multiple tables, the UPDATE then does not work. When I remove all of my JOIN's and go back to foreign keys and one table the update works again. Below is what I have for my SQL statements:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SELECT:SELECT People.FirstName, People.LastName, People.FullName, People.PropertyID, People.InviteTypeID, People.RSVP, People.Wheelchair, Property.[House/Day Hab], InviteType.InviteTypeName FROM (InviteType INNER JOIN (Property INNER JOIN People ON Property.PropertyID = People.PropertyID) ON InviteType.InviteTypeID = People.InviteTypeID) WHERE (People.PersonID = ?)UPDATE:UPDATE [People] SET [FirstName] = ?, [LastName] = ?, [FullName] = ?, [PropertyID] = ?, [InviteTypeID] = ?, [RSVP] = ?, [Wheelchair] = ? WHERE [PersonID] = ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The only fields I want to update are in [People]. My WHERE is based on a control that I use to select a person from a drop down list. If I run the test query for the update while setting up my data source the query will update the record in the database. It is when I try to make the update from the gridview that the data is not changed. If anything is not clear please let me know and I will clarify as much as I can. This is my first project using ASP and working with databases so I am completely learning as I go. I took some database courses in college but I have never interacted with them with a web based front end. Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you in advance for any time, help, and/or advice you can give.Brian
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2015
Ok I have a query "SELECT ColumnNames FROM tbl1" let's say the values returned are "age,sex,race".
Now I want to be able to create an "update" statement like "UPATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race" dynamically and execute this UPDATE statement. So, if the next select statement returns "age, sex, race, gender" then the script should create "UPDATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race + gender" and execute it.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2014
i was tasked to created an UPDATE statement for 6 tables , i would like to update 4 columns within the 6 tables , they all contains the same column names. the table gets its information from the source table, however the data that is transferd to the 6 tables are sometimes incorrect , i need to write a UPDATE statement that will automatically correct the data. the Update statement should also contact a where clause
the columns are [No] , [Salesperson Code], [Country Code] and [Country Name]
i was thinking of doing
Update [tablename]
SET [No] =
CASE
WHEN [No] ='AF01' THEN 'Country Code' = 'ZA7' AND 'Country Name' = 'South Africa'
ELSE 'Null'
END
What is the best way to script this
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2015
I am attempting to run update statements within a SELECT CASE statement.
Select case x.field
WHEN 'XXX' THEN
 UPDATE TABLE1
  SET TABLE1.FIELD2 = 1
 ELSE
  UPDATE TABLE2
  SET TABLE2.FIELD1 = 2
END
FROM OuterTable x
I get incorrect syntax near the keyword 'update'.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hello,I am trying to update records in my database from excel data using vbaeditor within excel.In order to launch a query, I use SQL langage in ADO as follwing:------------------------------------------------------------Dim adoConn As ADODB.ConnectionDim adoRs As ADODB.RecordsetDim sConn As StringDim sSql As StringDim sOutput As StringsConn = "DSN=MS Access Database;" & _"DBQ=MyDatabasePath;" & _"DefaultDir=MyPathDirectory;" & _"DriverId=25;FIL=MS Access;MaxBufferSize=2048;PageTimeout=5;" &_"PWD=xxxxxx;UID=admin;"ID, A, B C.. are my table fieldssSql = "SELECT ID, `A`, B, `C being a date`, D, E, `F`, `H`, I, J,`K`, L" & _" FROM MyTblName" & _" WHERE (`A`='MyA')" & _" AND (`C`>{ts '" & Format(Date, "yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss") & "'})"& _" ORDER BY `C` DESC"Set adoConn = New ADODB.ConnectionadoConn.Open sConnSet adoRs = New ADODB.RecordsetadoRs.Open Source:=sSql, _ActiveConnection:=adoConnadoRs.MoveFirstSheets("Sheet1").Range("a2").CopyFromRecordset adoRsSet adoRs = NothingSet adoConn = Nothing---------------------------------------------------------------Does Anyone know How I can use the UPDATE, DELETE INSERT SQL statementsin this environement? Copying SQL statements from access does not workas I would have to reference Access Object in my project which I do notwant if I can avoid. Ideally I would like to use only ADO system andSQL approach.Thank you very muchNono
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
It appears to update only the first qualifying row. The trace shows a row count of one when there are multiple qualifying rows in the table. This problem does not exist in JDBC 2000.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2007
Hello,
I'm writing a fairly involved stored procedure. In this Stored Procedure, I have an update statement, followed by a select statement. The results of the select statement should be effected by the previous update statement, but its not. When the stored procedure is finish, the update statement seemed to have worked though, so it is working.
I suspect I need something, like a GO statement, but that doesnt seem to work for a stored procedure. Can anyone offer some assistance?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2000
I have a complex(long) SQL statement inside of a stored procedure which feeds several variables from 2 tables. Something like
Select @var1, @var2, etc from
table1, table2 where
table1.id = table2.id
Is there any advantage to creating a view for this statement
and selecting from that, even though this resides in a stored procedure?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2008
hi all,
I have a function and batch witch consisted of same sql statement, and they will get the same result. but time they take is different, and produce a little different query plans, another significant difference is the estimated numbers. the function is always slower than the batch.
does anyone know why same sql would produce different query plans performance? how do i can to let the function as fast as the batch?
thanks!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
Hi,
My friend expresses his concern over the performance of his update query.
He says the execution time takes around 120 ms.
the query is looking like
Update table set col1 = 'value', col2 = 'val', col3= 'val'............ col40='val'
where col1 = 'value' and col2 = 'value' and col3 = 'val' and col4 = 'val'
He says he's updating around 40 columns at a stretch with filter conditions as shown, and only 1 row is getting affected by this.Where the col1, col2,col3 n col4 are composite primary keys and have default clustered indexes created on them.
Is that the execution time he say is really a performance issue ? I'm confused on this
Experts, pls post your comments and any tips on improving update query in general will immensely help.
thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I've just inherited a system and have some concerns about the speed ofconnections to a remote server (SQL2000). If I do a simple selectstatement on the table below, it takes 14 minutes to retrive 6 millionrows across a 2Mb line. Obviously it's a reasonable amount of data toretrieve, but I would have thought this would be quicker if I'm honest.Run locally, this is 50 seconds.My thoughts are that there may be some issues with our connection (weget general network errors sporadically, which are being looked at),but wanted some thoughts if the performance is acceptable for what itis doing with what is available. I don't think there is a SQL issue,but want to check if this sounds about right.It's early days, so I'm after a general impression of the speed ofretrieval for the amount of data on the available bandwidth. Assuming abest performance scenario, what is the minimum time it should take as abest guess ?ThanksRyanCREATE TABLE [FIELD_VALUES] ([DEALER_DATA_ID] [int] NOT NULL ,[FIELD_CODE] [varchar] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL ,[FIELD_VALUE] [numeric](15, 5) NULL ,[CHANGED_TYPE] [int] NULL ,CONSTRAINT [PK_FIELD_VALUES] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([DEALER_DATA_ID],[FIELD_CODE]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]) ON [PRIMARY]GO
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2014
I run the following statement and it will not update beyond 7 million plus rows and I have about 38 million to complete. I keep checking updated row counts and after 1/2 day it's still the same so I know something is wrong because it was rolling through no problem when I initiated it. I need to complete ASAP so it's adding to my frustration. The 'Acct_Num_CH' field is an encrypted field (fyi).
SET rowcount 10000
UPDATE [dbo].[CC_Info_T]
SET [Acct_Num_CH] = 'ayIWt6C8sgimC6t61EJ9d8BB3+bfIZ8v'
WHERE [Acct_Num_CH] IS NOT NULL
WHILE @@ROWCOUNT > 0
BEGIN
SET rowcount 10000
UPDATE [dbo].[CC_Info_T]
SET [Acct_Num_CH] = 'ayIWt6C8sgimC6t61EJ9d8BB3+bfIZ8v'
WHERE [Acct_Num_CH] IS NOT NULL
END
SET rowcount 0
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2002
I should add an Identity field (Identity=True) and a row version field(timestamp) to my table, and avoid to arrange tables into different databases, is it true in general?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2007
Recently we moved few of our databases from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005 (SP 2) using backup and restore. After the restore I did Reindex and update stats on the databases. Since then we have observed performance issues on SQL 2005 databases but this performance problem vanishes the moment we run (sp_updatestats). Is this a problem with SQL 2005 that we have to run sp_updatestats 2 times a days or 3 times a day. In SQL 2000 we ran it only Once a week and still we never had any performance issues. Is there any config change we need to do to fix this problem in SQL 2005?
Thanks !
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2007
Hello!I have this piece of SQL code:UPDATE aSET Field1 = c.Field1FROM aINNER JOIN b ON a.GUID1 = b.GUID1INNER JOIN c ON b.GUID2 = c.GUID2WHERE c.Type = 1AND @date BETWEEN b.DateFrom AND b.DateToThis query takes hours to complete.Now while trying to find out what's causing the poor performance (itsurely looks simple enough!) I've rewritten it to use temp tables:SELECT a.GUID1, a.Field1, c.Type, b.DateFrom, b.DateTo INTO #temptableFROM aINNER JOIN b ON a.GUID1 = b.GUID1INNER JOIN c ON b.GUID2 = c.GUID2WHERE c.Type = 1AND @date BETWEEN b.DateFrom AND b.DateToUPDATE a SET Field1 = subsel.Field1FROM (SELECT * FROM #temptable) AS subselWHERE subsel.GUID1 = a.GUID1Now it completes in 10 seconds.My question is why? Am I wrong in saying that the two batches aboveproduce same results? Is there something I've missed about the UPDATEFROM syntax? Why would the first query perform THAT poorly?Table sizes:a: 24k rowsb: 268k rowsc: 260k rowsGUIDs are of type uniqueidentifier.Any answers appreciated!Regards,// Richard
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Dear Sql Server experts:First off, I am no sql server expert :)A few months ago I put a database into a production environment.Recently, It was brought to my attention that a particular query thatexecuted quite quickly in our dev environment was painfully slow inproduction. I analyzed the the plan on the production server (itlooked good), and then tried quite a few tips that I'd gleaned fromreading newsgroups. Nothing worked. Then on a whim I performed anUPDATE STATISTICS on a few of the tables that were being queried. Thequery immediately went from executing in 61 seconds to under 1 second.I checked to make sure that statistics were being "auto updated" andthey were.Why did I need to run UPDATE STATISTICS? Will I need to again?A little more background info:The database started empty, and has grown quite rapidly in the lastfew months. One particular table grows at a rate of about 300,000records per month. I get fast query times due to a few well placedindexes.A quick question:If I add an index, do statistics get automatically updated for thisnew index immediately?Thanks in advance for any help,Felix
View 17 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hi All,
Not sure if this question belongs in this area or the server area but I'll start here. Here is my problem. We have an C/C++ app that was originally written for SQL 2000 and uses DBLibrary. We have converted it to SQL 2005 and are using ODBC/Native client to access the SQL 2005 database. This all works great. So we were doing some performance testing and we noticed that our update performance seems slower in the SQL 2005/ODBC case than it did in the SQL 2000/DBLibrary case. Inserts and queries all perform great, in fact the inserts are significantly faster in the SQL 2005/ODBC case which is good. We are using Array inserts/updates/queries wherever possible as this is faster obviously. In our update case, it takes 1.14 seconds to update 2000 rows in table in the SQL 2005/ODBC case, while SQL 2000/DBLibrary case takes .39 seconds to the exact same thing. The table in question is a 12 column table with all integer columns, with an index on the first three columns.
So my question is this. Is there something different about Array Updates in SQL 2005 ? I've looked thru the list of hot fixes available since SQL 2005 SP2 and haven't seen anything that directly mentions Updates so I'm hesitant to go off and start applying the hot fixes to our server to see if the behavior changes. It seems strange to me that Array Inserts would be very fast, but Updates wouldn't be. I've checked the ODBC Data Source and we aren't doing anything fancy there. I'm not actually even sure if this problem is client side or server side as I said earlier.
If anyone has any ideas or thoughts that would be great since this is really bugging me.
Here is a sample of what our C code is doing. This is simplied and I've removed a lot of our own code but these are the SQL calls that we are making in order so maybe can see something wrong I'm doing.
//----Sample Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pSQL = "Update bob set VV=? where VI=?" // not done this way actually in our code but just to show the update text
status = SQLPrepare ( hS, (UCHAR *)pSQL, SQL_NTS );
// Called twice with nCol = 1 and then with nCol = 2
status = SQLSetParam (
hS,
abs(nCol),
cType, // cType = 5 = SQL_C_LONG
sqlType, // sqlType = 4 = SQL_INTEGER
38, // size needed in case the column is numeric or decimal
0,
p16Data, // Pointer to my array of data
NULL
);
SQLSetStmtAttr(hS, SQL_ATTR_PARAMSET_SIZE, (SQLPOINTER)numrows, 0); // numrows = 2000
SQLSetStmtAttr(hS, SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR, &p16cRows, 0);
status = SQLExecute (hS);
SQLParamOptions(hS, 1, NULL);
SQLFreeStmt ( hS, SQL_RESET_PARAMS );
//----Sample Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Nick
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2007
If I run sp_updatestats, does it effect performance?
My testing also reveals canceling sp_updatestats, doesn't caus a rollback?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2014
1. I have a simple JOIN statement between A and B, e.g. Cities A JOIN Countries B:
SELECT A.City_Name, B.Country_Code, B.Country_Area
FROM Cities A
JOIN Countries B
ON B.Country_Id = A.Country_Id
WHERE B.Country_Type='ABC';
That statement works absolutely fine, very fast (less than a second) and returns me 2 records
2. I need to replace Country Area column with 1 for Europe and 0 for all the rest. I implement so in the following way:
SELECT A.City_Name, B.Country_Code, CASE B.Country_Area WHEN 'EUR' THEN 1 ELSE 0 AS Country_Area
FROM Cities A
JOIN Countries B
ON B.Country_Id = A.Country_Id
WHERE B.Country_Type='ABC';
Now to get the same two records it takes 03:55 minutes (!)
I have looked into Estimated Execution Plan, but couldn't spot any difference - all straight forward.
It is SQL 2012 SP1 with compatibility level set to 110
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2008
Hi all
I have a Large log table with large size data(I month only),If I run a query like SELECT * FROM <table_name> Server will go€¦very very slow€¦.
Because of large Data system is going slow€¦..
Please some body helps me with suggestion how get good performance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
I installed the SQL Server 2005 SP2 update 2 rollup on my 64-bitserver and the performance has tanked!I installed rollup 3 on some of them, but that did not seem to help.I thought it was just a linked server performance issue, but myoptimization started running today on one of the "update 2" instancesand so far it's been running about 10 hours longer than it normallydoes.The rollup 3 fixed our stack dumping issues, but we NEED to have thisperformance thing fixed!I saw that MS has come out with update 4 last week - doesn't sayanything about fixing this, though.Has anyone else experienced this?I'm not necessarily expecting anyone to have a fix for this, justwantto know I'm looking in the right place before I call MS.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
Hi,I have table with three columns as belowtable name:expNo(int) name(char) refno(int)I have data as belowNo name refno1 a2 b3 cI need to update the refno with no values I write a query as belowupdate exp set refno=(select no from exp)when i run the query i got error asSubquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when thesubquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used asan expression.I need to update one colum with other column value.What is the correct query for this ?Thanks,Mani
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2007
Dim lblock As Boolean chkChecked = lblock strSQL = "UPDATE CLIENTS SET " If blnCompleted = True Then strSQL = strSQL & "COMPLETED_DT = '" & Format(Now(), "MM/dd/yyyy") & "', " Else strSQL = strSQL & "LAST_SAVED_DT = '" & Format(Now(), "MM/dd/yyyy") & "', " End If strSQL = strSQL & "COMMENTS = '" & FixString(txtcomments.Text) & "' " _ & "WHERE client_ID = " & iclientID & ""I want to put my booleen value lblock to sql too, I probably need value of it, It is checkbox, called chkblock, . how would I include this to update statement database field for that BLOCK =
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2007
Hi, i nid help on update statement. I using 03 and a microsoft sql server 2000 database.
I use a more simple example of my error. A Northwind Database is use to update the Region table(RegionDescription)
User will 1st go in WebForm2.aspx and enter a id, if found will retrieve the data to WebForm1.aspx. User type "1" and retrieve Eastern to TextBox1.
User can choose to update the table by typing in a diff word into TextBox1. But when i type any word(e.g East) the page is refresh back to Webform1.aspx with the not updated data and the database is also not updated. Any idea?
WebForm2.aspx.vb Imports System.Data.SqlClient Public Class WebForm2
Inherits System.Web.UI.PageWeb Form Designer Generated Code Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
'Put user code to initialize the page hereEnd SubPrivate Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Session("id") = TextBox1.Text
Response.Redirect("WebForm1.aspx")End Sub
End Class
WebForm1.aspx.vb Imports System.Data.SqlClient Public Class WebForm1
Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
Web Form Designer Generated CodeDim cnn As New SqlConnection("Data Source=(local); Initial Catalog=Northwind;User ID=******; Password=******") Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
'Put user code to initialize the page here
Label1.Text = Session("id")
retrieveTitle()End SubSub retrieveTitle()
cnn.Open()Dim cmd As New SqlCommand
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM Region WHERE RegionID = '" + Session("id") + "'"
cmd.Connection = cnnDim dr As SqlDataReader
dr = cmd.ExecuteReader()
If dr.Read() Then
TextBox1.Text = dr("RegionDescription").ToString
End If
cnn.Close()End SubSub UpdateTitle(ByVal title As String)
cnn.Open()Dim sqlstr As String = "UPDATE Region SET RegionDescription = '" + title + "' WHERE RegionID = '" + Session("id") + "'"
Trace.Write(sqlstr)Dim cmd As New SqlCommand(sqlstr, cnn)
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
cnn.Close()End SubPrivate Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
UpdateTitle(TextBox1.Text)End Sub
End Class
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2008
I have a SQL Table with the following columns
ID, Date, Meeting, Venue, Notes
What Update statement do i need to update a simple grid view in Visual Studio?I have been experementing but when i click update it updates the whole column insted of the one i was trying to update.
Please can you help? Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2008
I need some help. please. Here is what I got. From the webpage I can pull the following data to update a table. update Vehicle set Name='TestUnitName' ,Make='TestMake', Model='TestModel', SoftwareVersion='TestVersion', DynamicChange='1', ProviderID='1', Description='TestDescription', VIN='TestVIN', IMEI='TestSIM', EngineTypeId=' ', Phone=' ', MobilePhoneProviderID='' where VehicleID=64 But I also get the error: "The UPDATE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_Vehicle_EngineTypes". The conflict occurred in database "Telemetry", table "dbo.EngineTypes", column 'EngineTypeId'.The statement has been terminated." How do I solve this issue? Actually what I am trying to do is, when EngineTypeId=' ' , I want to set is to NULL and same for the MobilePhoneProviderID. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2004
Hey all,
I need to set a column value where the id is within a string. However, I need to set the column to a default value if the id is not within the string. Hope that was easy to understand!
ie:
This currently works...
SET @strSQL = 'UPDATE tblTest SET Archive = 1 WHERE RecID IN (' + @IDList + ')
If the ID is not in the list then I want that column set to 0. How can I do this?
Thanks in advance,
Pete
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2004
Hi
I use a update sub, the problem is that i got an error, the error is:
Syntax error in UPDATE statement.
I guess the UPDATE statement is:
strUpdate = "Update tblUsers Set UserName=@UserName, Password=@Password, RetypePassword=@RetypePassword, Email=@Email, Comments=@Comments Where UserID=@UserID"
Remark:I use Acceess DataBase, exactly the same code works fine in SQL, i just changed the DataBase(From Access to SQL).
Is the problem can be in other place?
Thank you very much for your assistance.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2004
Hi, I'm having trouble writing this update statement and was wondering if anyone could help me out :
My database is sort of set up lilke this:
There are 3 tables: Orders, OrderDetails and Inventory
Orders has a pk called OrderID.
OD has several ProductIDs listed for that OrderID
Inventory has 2 fields, the pk InventoryID(which is the same as
ProductID) and QOH
So OD kinda looks like this:
OrderID ProductID Quantity Cost
192 12 2 $10
192 3 1 $12
192 14 2 $50
193 12 1 $11
.... .
...
...
so what i want to do is take each productID for a specific orderid
and decrement the inventory for it by OD.quantity
This is what I was trying
UPDATE Inventory
Set QOH = QOH - @qty
WHERE Inventory.InventoryID IN (
SELECT ProductID
FROM OrderDetails
WHERE OrderDetails.OrderID = @OrderID
and @qty = OrderDetails.Quantity
)
but, i'm having no luck...... any suggestions ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
