I have 2 tables (master and masterbackup), trying to update and replace the status in one with the other based on master.number match
UPDATE master m
set m.status = (SELECT status from masterbackup where number = m.number )
FROM mastermasterbackup
I have 2 SQL server 2000 machines, I need to take a table from each one and combine them together based on a date time stamp. The first machine has a database that records information based on an event it is given a timestamp the value of variable is stored and a few other fields are stored in Table A. The second machine Table B has test data entered in a lab scenario. This is a manufacturing facility so the Table A data is recorded by means of a third party software. Whenever a sample is taken in the plant the event for Table A is triggered and recorded in the table. The test data may be entered on that sample in Table B several hours later the lab technician records the time that the sample was taken in Table B but it is not exact to match with the timestamp in Table A. I need to combine each of these tables into a new SQL server 2005 database on a new machine. After combining the tables which I am assuming I can based on a query that looks at the timestamp on both Tables A & B and match the rows up based on the closest timestamp. I need to continuously update these tables with the new data as it comes in. I havent worked with SQL for a couple of years and have looked at several ways to complete this task but havent had much luck. I have researched linked servers, SSIS, etc Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a database schema that has an Address table used to store addresses for different entities such as Customers and Employees. I want to reuse the same Address record between different Customers and Employees without duplicating any address information. I'm not sure what the best approach might be.
Should have I have seperate stored procedures on the Address table that update and insert new addresses, where each Address record remains immutable once created? (So the update stored procedure actually creates a new Address record if the data changes). These stored procedures would then be invoked by business logic and used in tandem with stored procedures that act on Customers and Employees to ensure that no address records are duplicated.
Or should I create a view on a Customer joined with Address, and similarily with Employee and Address, and have stored procedures that act on these views and ensure that no Address records are duplicated. Should I use instead of triggers to override the behavior of insert and update on the view to achieve these?
I'm rather lost as to what direction I should take. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
My problem is very simple and that is that I'm trying to copy some tables between databases, but these tables are in different schemas.
let's say I have
dbo.tableA
sch1.tableA
sch2.tableA
sch3.tableA
And I just want to copy let's say sch1.tableA to a Different DB.
If I use Transfer SQL Server Object task and select the table and save the package and try to open the task again, all the tables with name TableA will be selected!! it seems like although it does show the schema ( when I am selecting the table manually ) but it doe snot store the schema detail in the tablelist collection property of the task.
Would please recommend any other way to achieve this.
Many Thanks in advance
By default, I constructed my database using the dbo Schema. I have since created new Schemas, and want to change some of the tables from dbo.
Is there a way to change the existing schema of a table without disrupting the data that is inside the table?
For example:
Current: dbo.Products
Desired Change: NewSchemaName.Products
Thanks.
I am curious why my stored procedures are parsing properly when you do not reference a table with its schema. The stored procs then fail when you run them.
It seems that the parser does not validate that a tables schema is missing.
This is an example stored procedure against the Person.Address table in the Adventureworks database. It will execute fine if I change the FROM clause to Person.Address.
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[Address_Load]
@AddressID [int]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @intError int
BEGIN TRY
SELECT A.[AddressID]
, A.[AddressLine1]
, A.[AddressLine2]
, A.[City]
, A.[StateProvinceID]
, A.[PostalCode]
FROM [Address] A
WHERE A.[AddressID] = @AddressID
IF @@ROWCOUNT = 0
BEGIN
RAISERROR('Record not found', 16, 1) -- Record not found.
END
-- Return success
RETURN 0
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
SET @intError = ERROR_NUMBER();
-- Log error here
RETURN @intError;
END CATCH
END
The stored proc parses fine and gets saved to the database but when executing it I get the following
Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Address_Load, Line 10
Invalid object name 'Address'.
Is there any way to change this so the parsing will generate an error and not allow this into the database?
Thanks,
Cory
table1 has 3 fields:
bookNumber
123
234
345
status -- status defaul value is 0
partnerNumber
1
2
3
table 2 has 2 fields
bookNumber
234
345
567
789
partnerNumber
1
2
3
4
A stored procedure named remove_books, which remove books if the conditions are true.
If stored procedure is executed. That means, it removes the bookNumbers from table2 if the conditions are true. Lets say it removes 234 from table2
then
do update in table1 status = 1 for BookNumber 234.
Hi,
I have the following scenario: N identical Databases (corresponding to different Fiscal Years, with names <Company Name>.<YEAR>). We want to consolidate the N DBs to a New Datawarehouse.
In SSIS we have designed a Dataflow that reads through a OLE DB Source (Connected to one of the N Databases) and maps to a OLE DB Destination (Connected to the NEW DB).
The question is, how we loop in SSIS through the N identical Connections, so to repeatedly execute the designed Dataflow, each time with a different Connection?
Thanks in Advance,
--Dimitris Doukas
Dear Experts,
I have a stored procudure which can be successful called from application and update against tables, the question is how do I get the status which can indicate how many records were updated or no any record was updated in the action?
Thanks in advance.
Consider the following tableCustomercustId char(10)accountExpiryDate datetimeaccountStatus bitNow, I want to update the accountStatus to False as soon as thecurrent date becomes accountExpiryDate.I think it can be done using "SQL Agent" but my webhost doesnt provideme access to that. I have access only to the Query Analyzer.ThanksShane
View 12 Replies View RelatedGreetings,
I have two SQL Server tables on the same server and in the same database. I'll call them table A and table B. They have identical schemas. I need to insert all rows in table A into table B. (Don't laugh - this is just for testing and long run the tables will reside on different servers.)
Can someone please tell me the correct task to use for this and the connection type I need for both the source and destination?
Thanks,
Black Cat Bone
I have >200 tables and I want to create a table that lists the name ofeach table, the number of records, and the number of locations withinthe table.I've created a cursor to do this but it doesn't like it. I get thefollowing error.Invalid column name '<tablename>'.Here's my scriptDECLARE @tbl varchar(100)DECLARE @sql varchar(1000)-- Insert statements for procedure heredeclare c_table cursor forselect table_name from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES where table_type ='base table' order by table_nameopen c_tablefetch next from c_table into @tblwhile (@@fetch_status = 0)beginset @SQL = 'INSERT INTO [zzTable_Status]SELECT ('+ @tbl +') as tblname, count(distinct station__no),count(station__no)FROM [bronze_views].'+@tbl+''exec (@SQL)Print @tbl + ' Updated'fetch next from c_table into @tblendclose c_tabledeallocate c_tableAny help is appreciated...
View 13 Replies View RelatedDear All
Within the sysusers table there is a field named status... All the users has this field set to 2. However there is a particular user and the status for this user is set to 14. Does anyone knows what this means... i.e. why the status field is not set to 2 as it is for the other users?
Regards
Sandro
SID statusid listindex listsize sent
1Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â 1
2Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 50Â Â Â Â Â Â 0
3Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â Â 75Â Â Â Â Â Â 150Â Â Â Â Â Â 1
4Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 14Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â 25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1
I have a table like above where cid is unique but status is not for all the status id i need put 1 as they sent out .but till now i used max listindex because they used to send files sequentially but now list index is random so how to update sent to 1 for all the status ids.
Hi All,
I want to know the status of an index whether it is corrupted or it needs to be reindexed etc ?
I used the sp_MShelpindex tablename stored procedure to retrieve the status also.
In the status column it is showing as 0,2 and 2000 values . what are these values ?
Thanks
Murali
In my SSIS program I have a main package that calls bunch of packages step by step. I would like to find out how can I capture the status of each task once its done and insert the value whether its "success" or "failure" into a sql server table.
any ideas how should I go about doing this?
I want to produce a summary table of amounts per status per user.
I have 2 tables:
Invoices:
Code:
user_id, amount, status
1, £10, S
2, £20, P
3, £30, P
3, £40, E
Users:
Code:
user_id, name
1, user A
2, user B
3, user C
And I want to produce a summary table like this:
Code:
S P E Total
user A £10 £10
user B £20 £20
user C £30 £40 £70
What I have is:
Code:
SELECT Users.name,
(SELECT SUM(amount) FROM Invoices AS t1 WHERE t1.user_id = Invoices.user_id AND (t1.status = 'S')),
(SELECT SUM(amount) FROM Invoices AS t1 WHERE t1.user_id = Invoices.user_id AND (t1.status = 'P')),
(SELECT SUM(amount) FROM Invoices AS t1 WHERE t1.user_id = Invoices.user_id AND (t1.status = 'E')),
(SELECT SUM(amount) FROM Invoices AS t1 WHERE t1.user_id = Invoices .user_id AND (t1.status IN ('S','P','E')))
FROM Invoices
LEFT JOIN Users ON Users.user_id = Invoices .user_id
GROUP BY Invoices.user_id, Users.name
ORDER BY Users.name
This does give me what I want, however the real situation has lots of status codes, many more fields in the Invoices table, hundreds of users and hundred of thousands of records in the Invoice table and I have run out of system memory.
Hello,
I have a table which i use to queue messages in. in this table there is a status column along with all the other message colums (ID, body, phone, time, etc). I use tinyint to express the diffrent status values (my frist question is, should i continue using tinyint, or is there some sort of enum, or another suggestion?). the value 1 means its a new message. An external process polls this table and pics up messages that are new.
Some messages fail, and so their status is changed to two. An external post process comes along and does what it needs to with messages that have status' which it handles, for example message failures, it might erase it, or change its status back to 1.
I expect to handle thousands of messages per hour. Should I create another table, which has only id and status as columns. And when a message fails I will place it in here instead of placing it in my original table. then the post process only polls this table and joins with my main table. instead of having both processes poll the single table. Would this be more efficient for sql internal seraching? since it has a smaller table to search in? or does it not make a diffrence.
Thank you.
Hi everyone
I have a problem about sysusers table in sql2005.
if you run the query in SQL2000
select * from sysusers where status = 2
and you can see the users which are created as sqlauthentication.
But in sql2005 status column equals 0 for sql authenticated users.
Is this a bug or the sturucture of the sysusers table is changed???
And how can i query the sql authenticated users in sql2005.
thanks
Hi,I have table with three columns as belowtable name:expNo(int) name(char) refno(int)I have data as belowNo name refno1 a2 b3 cI need to update the refno with no values I write a query as belowupdate exp set refno=(select no from exp)when i run the query i got error asSubquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when thesubquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used asan expression.I need to update one colum with other column value.What is the correct query for this ?Thanks,Mani
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi SQL fans,I realized that I often encounter the same situation in a relationdatabase context, where I really don't know what to do. Here is anexample, where I have 2 tables as follow:__________________________________________ | PortfolioTitle|| Portfolio |+----------------------------------------++-----------------------------+ | tfolio_id (int)|| folio_id (int) |<<-PK----FK--| tfolio_idfolio (int)|| folio_name (varchar) | | tfolio_idtitle (int)|--FK----PK->>[ Titles]+-----------------------------+ | tfolio_weight(decimal(6,5)) |+-----------------------------------------+Note that I also have a "Titles" tables (hence the tfolio_idtitlelink).My problem is : When I update a portfolio, I must update all theassociated titles in it. That means that titles can be either removedfrom the portfolio (a folio does not support the title anymore), addedto it (a new title is supported by the folio) or simply updated (atitle stays in the portfolio, but has its weight changed)For example, if the portfolio #2 would contain :[ PortfolioTitle ]id | idFolio | idTitre | poids1 2 1 102 2 2 203 2 3 30and I must update the PortfolioTitle based on these values :idFolio | idTitre | poids2 2 202 3 352 4 40then I should1 ) remove the title #1 from the folio by deleting its entry in thePortfolioTitle table2 ) update the title #2 (weight from 30 to 35)3 ) add the title #4 to the folioFor now, the only way I've found to do this is delete all the entriesof the related folio (e.g.: DELETE TitrePortefeuille WHERE idFolio =2), and then insert new values for each entry based on the new givenvalues.Is there a way to better manage this by detecting which value has to beinserted/updated/deleted?And this applies to many situation :(If you need other examples, I can give you.thanks a lot!ibiza
View 8 Replies View Relatedhi,friends
we show record from multiple table using single 'selectcommand'.
like....
---------
select *
from cust_detail,vend_detail
---------
i want to insert value in multiple database table(more than one) using single 'insert command'.
is it possible?
give any idea or solution.
i want to update value in multiple database table(more than one) using single 'update command'
i want to delete value in multiple database table(more than one) using singl 'delete command'
it is possible?
give any idea or solution.
it's urgent.
thanks in advance.
I have a table where table row gets updated multiple times(each column will be filled) based on telephone call in data.
Â
Initially, I have implemented after insert trigger on ROW level thinking that the whole row is inserted into table will all column values at a time. But the issue is all columns are values are not filled at once, but observed that while telephone call in data, there are multiple updates to the row (i.e multiple updates in the sense - column data in row is updated step by step),
I thought to implement after update trigger , but when it comes to the performance will be decreased for each and every hit while row update.
I need to implement after update trigger that should be fired on column level instead of Row level to improve the performance?
I'm trying to understand the schemas in SQL Server 2005. I have a script which was given to me by someone as follow and I'm trying to run the script but it gave me an error at the create view section:
Assume an empty database has been created.
CREATE SCHEMA [mySchema] AUTHORIZATION [dbo]
GO
CREATE TABLE [tblABC] ( ... ) /*note: it didn't bind the table to the above schema*/
create view mySchema.vwMyView as
SELECT * FROM mySchema.tblABC
GO
However I'm confused because the above CREATE VIEW made a reference to the table with the schema. Can someone help clarify. When i tried to create the view, it gives me an error that it is unable to find the mySchema.tblABC table. To me, the error is correct as per my understanding of binding a table to a schema ---> If you do not create a table and bind it to a schema, you are not able to call it together with the schema.
What I'm trying to understand is, without explicitly stating [mySchema] during the table creation, is there a way where it is mysteriously binded thus the CREATE VIEW somehow understood that tblABC has been binded therefore it called the table in the view? or is this just a script error.
Btw, this script was generated from a working database.
Hi Guys,
I'm afraid the schemas of the Development and Production versions of a database are in fact diferent.
How may I compare two database schemas?
Thanks in advance !-)
Is there anyway to differentiate between two schemas between two SQL server instances?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,Anyone know an online source for database schemas, or schemas for singletables i.e. where can I download a schema for an addresses table?--Richhttp://www.badangling.com -= Sea fishing badly explained =-
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to create a local database cache from an SQL 2005 database that uses non standard schemas (like AdventureWorks). I have tried in Visual Studio 2008 but any database that does not use .dbo will not allow any tables to be copied locally. Even setting the default schema for my login does not enable adding any tables in the Configure Data Synchronization dialog box.
If it is not possible via Visual Studio is there any other way? I notice all examples with Sql Compact conveniently use Northwind. Seemingly Compact edition does not support non .dbo schemas.
Hi,
I wanted to find out what the statement is for finding out the number of schemas in all your databases.
I know in 2005 the you can do a select * from sys.schemas
but how do you achieve the same thing in sql server 2000 ?
Please let me know..
Thanks,
Hi,
How do I find out the number of schemas in sql server 2000 and 2005 for each database?
Also, how can i find the number of tables in each database?
I'm trying to figure this out but can't find anything on google.
Please help.
Thanks,
Kapinak
I have schema called [sitex] for some tables .
I have to perform insert or update operations in to these tables through views only and these views were created with [site] schema
All stored procedures are written in the point of view only ( all DML operations into the tables are through views).and these stored procedures has schema same as views.
Now come to the permissions and authorization.
We have some users like sa,112,janu
These users must have permissions only on site schema not on [sitex].
I have a role called €œtestrole€? with 112,janu users and I gave authorization on site schema on for testrole
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON SCHEMA::[site] TO [testRole]
Now I€™m getting error select permessions are denied on [sitex] schema.
But our requirement is 112 must don€™t have any type of permissions on tables
And also is there schema to schema permissions. (that mean [site] schema has permissions on [sitex] schema .
PLZ help me
Hello
Can anyone give an introduction to the use of schemas i SQL Server 2005. If have noticed the feature, but i would like to know why and how the use of schemas is a good thing.
If anyobe has a link to a whitepaper or practical insight that would be nice.
Hello
I've to write an trigger for the following action
When a entry is done in the table Adoscat79 having in the index field Statut_tiers the valeur 1 and a date in data_cloture for a customer xyz
all the entries in the same table where the no_tiers is the same as the one entered (many entriers) should have those both field updated
statut_tiers to 1
and date_cloture to the same date as entered
the same action has to be done when an update is done and the valeur is set to 1 for the statut_tiers and a date entered in the field date_clture
thank you for your help
I've never done a trigger before