Hi all,
I need SQL Server 2000 on the server, where SQL Server 2005 has been already installed. So I install SQL Server 2000 Instance as Named one. And everything is ok now when I connect locally from that server (SQL Server 2000 Instance is accessable both in SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager and SQL Server 2005 management Studio) and Default (SQL Server 2005 Instance) also works. But when I try to connect from SQL Server 2005 Management Studio (located on the other server) - only default instance is successfully connected, the named one - give an error:
TITLE: Connect to Server
------------------------------
Cannot connect to SERVER
AMED_INSTANCE.
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=-1&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
so I think smth wrong with using ports simultaneuosly.
For SQL Server 2005 Remote Connections are allowed both for TCP/IP and Named Pipes.
Default TCP Port: 1433
In SQL Server 2000 I didn't find where to allow remote connections.
After insallation in Server Network Utility - default TCP port - 0, in Client Network Utility - 1433.
I have already tried to replace 0 with 1433 - nothing changes,
and use 1434 both in Server and Client Network Utility - nothing changes.
I need a remote connect to SQL Server 2000 Instance.
I hope the answer exists. Thanks to any ideas.
I have seen information on the web about running two versions of SQL at the same time on the same server but was wondering any tricks of the trade regarding it. The main recommendation that I have seen is to have SQL 2000 SP4 running first as the default instance (which is my current situation on a development server) and then install SQL 2005 as a named instance on it. Should the SQL 2005 installation place its files in a dedicated directory (ie, C:SQL2005) as opposed to the default directory that the installation would normally write to, thus not overwriting any SQL 2000 system files? Any other recommendations?
Is it possible to have both servers installed and not having issues? I am really new to this. At my company we have both installed. At home I created a backup of a database in SQL Server 2005 but can not restore it here were we have both.
The message I got is: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlError: The backed-up database has on-disk structure version 611. The server supports version 539 and cannot restore or upgrade this database.
So I think it seems that even though I'm trying to restore it in 2005 this version still uses the old server or something.
Hi, I got on my developer computer one instance of msde 2000. I want to test sql server express 2005, can I install it without "scrap" my other instance of 2000?
Strange question maybee, but it's what I wanna do!
Has anyone developed a workaround to have SQL 6.5 and SQL 7.0 simultaneously active on the same NT 4.0 Server host. The use of VSWITCH.EXE to switch between SQL 6.5 and SQL 7.0 in not an acceptable solution. There are several applications that are only supported under SQL 6.5 and will not be upgraded to SQL 7.0 for another 3 to 6 months.
There are other applications (ERP and data mart) that were developed specifically for SQL 7.0 to take advantage of its new DTS, OLAP, and query capabilities.
All these applications need full-time access to their respective databases.
The obvious solution is to host SQL 6.5 and SQL 7.0 on separate servers. The client has a "monster" database server which would be too expensive to duplicate. Using a "standard" PC to host SQL 6.5 would significantly compromise performance of those applications.
Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated.
Andrew Dominguez, IMS ajd@cwix.com 909.625.4066 / 7826 fax
Hi,I have managed to create a second copy of my "live" database, forsoftware testing purposes.Inspecting the properties of the new database, everything seems inorder. The logical file name is the same, which I believe is fine, andthe physical database (and log file name) is different.However, despite the fact that there is no application currentlyaccessing the "testing" copy, both databases are seemingly beingupdated simultanously. I can tell this from the physical file sizes onthe server, which are identical, and growing at the same rate.Does anyone have any suggestions why this might be happening - and howI can stop it?Thanks in anticipation!Phil
Hi, I have requirement where I need to show the table sizes of each table in database. For this, I have written a procedure that finds the sizes and loads into a table. In my report, I should be able to run the procedure and select the rows from the table that I loaded the data into.
Is this possible to run the SP and then run query to get rows when a user clicks view report?
I am not an expert on T-SQL and I am trying out a small project to learn.
I have encountered a problem, whereby I have 2 tables, 1 containing the header (header_id, header_file, admin_menu_id and admin_submenu_id) and then I have another table called header_details, where I am storing the language details for this header, with the fields being (header_details_id, fk_header_id, header_alt, header_caption and fk_language_id)
Now I want to create a stored proc, first to insert the header and then the header details. I also want that if the header or header details already exist, I just do an update on these tables.
I tried the following code but its not working:-
ALTER Procedure [dbo].[INSERT_Header] ( @admin_menu_idint, @admin_submenu_idint, @header_filevarchar(150), @header_altvarchar(150), @header_captionvarchar(200), @language_idint @outIDint OUTPUT ) AS BEGIN
-- First do a select on the header table to see if this header already exists
DECLARE @count integer = 0
SELECT COUNT(*) as @count FROM headers WHERE[fk_admin_menu_id] = @admin_menu_id AND[fk_admin_submenu_id] = @admin_submenu_id
--if it exists, then update this header IF @count > 0 BEGIN UPDATE [headers] SET [header_file]= @header_file
WHERE [fk_admin_menu_id] = @admin_menu_id [fk_admin_submenu_id] = @admin_submenu_id ELSE -- Insert header in header table -- BEGIN INSERT INTO [headers] ([header_file] ,[fk_admin_menu_id] ,[fk_admin_submenu_id]) VALUES (@header_file ,@admin_menu_id ,@admin_submenu_id) -- Get the Inserted Header ID -- SET @outID = SCOPE_IDENTITY() END
-- Now do a select on the header_details table to see if this header with this language already exists DECLARE @count_details integer = 0
SELECT COUNT(*) as @count_details FROM header_detail WHERE[fk_admin_menu_id] = @admin_menu_id AND[fk_admin_submenu_id] = @admin_submenu_id AND[fk_language_id] = @language_id
--if it exists, then update this header IF @count_details > 0 BEGIN UPDATE [header_detail] SET[header_alt]= @header_file ,[header_caption] = @header_caption
WHERE [fk_header_id] = @header_id [fk_language_id] = @language_id ELSE -- Insert header in header table -- BEGIN INSERT INTO [header_detail] ([fk_header_id] ,[header_alt] ,[header_caption] ,[fk_language_id]) VALUES (@@out_ID ,@header_alt ,@header_caption ,@language_id) END
We would like to install Sql 2005 Enterprise Edition (including database engine, reporting service, integration service and analysis service) as a sepearte instance on a server which already has Sql 2000 with reporting services and analysis services. We do not want to disturb the existing sql 2000 setup.
If we do that then what will happen to my earlier sql 2000 reporting service? Will it be upgraded to sql 2005 reporting service? I heard that reporting services are instance unaware application. Where will be the default reporting service database available?
I have 2 tables EmployeeA(Eng) and EmployeeB(Spanish) kept in seperate mdb's. I want to add the records into Sql Server 2005 table called StateEmployee.
Procedure: 1. Loop through 2 folders..one containing table EmployeeA in mdb and other containing tbl EmployeeB in diff mdb's. 2. Pick a file from EmployeeA and EmployeeB, both at the same time. 3. Count the total no of rows in both files. If equal proceed. 4. Compare the 'employeeid' of one row of employeeA to the employeeid of EmployeeB. 5. If employee id matches, load both the rows in Sql server else file it to the error table. 6. Loop through all rows simultaneously till end of row. 7. Go to next mdb.
How do i go about this step by step. I am fairly new to SSIS.
I'm using ASP with a JScript variant and MSSQL Server 2000. I would like to write a script that basically erases all data except for a few things.
Is there a way to update multiple tables at once without having to write lines and lines of code? I tried UPDATE tbl1,tbl2 SET uid='asc', but to no avail. It gave me a syntax error. My thinking behind it is something like... UPDATE dbo.* SET uid='mferguson' and after that I can delete stuff like DELETE dbo.*... Any ideas?
I know the above is ASP, I've tried this thread in the ASP forum with no avail... they referred me to this forum.
Is there any problem with implementating some kind of replication andbacking up transaction logs at the same time? SQL Server 2000 StandardEditionThe server is configured to back up log files regularly, with thepresenceof a(New) Disaster recovery server and with an inability forstandby(Standard Edition)I am planning to implement some kind ofreplication hopefully still backing up the transaction logs to enablea point in time recovery.Thanks in advance for your great ideasVincento
We are currently using Crystal reports but are considering using SQL RS. We need to know if there is a restriction on simultanoeus access to the same report by multiple users? What happens when multiple users try to access the same report simultaneously? If reports can be accessed simultaneously, do the requests queue up or are they processed concurrently?
I have two table both say A and B.If i insert a record in A that record should be inserted in B.If i delete a record in A that record should be deleted from B.Is that possible.If yes please tell me.Thankyou in advance,vishnu
Alright, here's the deal. I'm testing some backup/restore strategies, and hitting a (slight) sticking point.
We've got collections of database and log backups created by the usual maintenance plans on a 2000 Enterprise machine. I'm trying to run through a restore onto a new 2005 machine (Developer Edition on my test workstation) using the collection of .bak and .trn files copied from the 2000 server. When I try to restore to a new database on 2005 via SSMS, and select all the .bak and .trn files for the restore, I get the ol' "The volume on device '[trimmed]' is not part of a multiple family media set. BACKUP WITH FORMAT can be used to form a new media set." error.
I'm assuming this just means that SQL Server can't verify that these log backups are in fact part of a functional "set", even if they aren't part of a traditional backup media set. Is there any way to tell SSMS, "It's okay man, just restore the database from these files, in this order - trust me," or is the only solution restoring every individual log file one at a time? (Which seems to work fine, though is a tremendous pain with any more than a few log backups.) Seems like there ought to be a good one-shot method to restore a bunch of backups to a different server, and I'm just not finding it.
I have a system of SSIS packages in which several packages perform the same lookup on the same table. E.g., i have PackageA, PackageB and PackageC all doing a lookup on TableA. All of these packages are spawned by the same PackageD and run frequently. In some cases, there is an issue with concurrency on these lookups. I get the following exception :
" The ProcessInput method on component "LKP Lookup SecurityID" (6658) failed with error code 0xC004702C. The identified component returned an error from the ProcessInput method. The error is specific to the component, but the error is fatal and will cause the Data Flow task to stop running.
"
The hex code of this exception corresponds to the following description : "DTS_E_BUFFERNOTLOCKED. This buffer is not locked and cannot be manipulated." That's as much as i could find on this.
My suspision is that the SSIS engine somehow figures that the lookup in these distinct packages is the same one and builds a shared version of the lookup table in memory. Then there is some sort of a multi-threading issue in accessing this shared memory which leads to the exception above.
Has anyone experienced this? Can someone shed some light on this?
I have experienced problem while trying to use variable with expression based on several other variables in tasks running parallel.
The details are as following:
There is a SSIS package with simple Control flow: one Script Task which actually do nothing and two Execute Process Tasks, they run after Script Task in parallel. Then there are three simple (EvaluateAsExpression = False) string variables ServerName, Folder and JobNumber with values ServerName = €œ\test€?, Folder = €œtest€? and JobNumber = €œ12345€?. And there is one variable FullPath with expression @[User:: ServerName] + "\" + @[User::Folder] + "_" + @[User::JobNumber]. All the variables are of the Package scope. Then in Execute Process Tasks I have similar expressions based on FullPath variable: Execute Process Task 1 has expression @[User::FullPath] + "\date.bat" and Execute Process Task 2 has @[User::FullPath] + "\time.bat" one. As you understand these expressions define what exactly task should execute.
Then I€™m going to execute package from command line so appropriate XML configuration file has been created. The file contains following values for variables described above: ServerName = €œ\LiveServer€?, Folder = €œJob€? and JobNumber = €œ33091€?.
After series of consequent executions I have got following log file:
€¦ Execute Process Task 1€¦ Executing the process €œ\LiveServerJob_33091date.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 2€¦ Executing the process €œ\Test est_12345 ime.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 1€¦ Executing the process €œ\Test est_12345date.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 2€¦ Executing the process €œ\LiveServerJob_33091 ime.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 1€¦ Executing the process €œ\LiveServerJob_33091date.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 2€¦ Executing the process €œ\Test est_12345 ime.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 1€¦ Executing the process €œ\LiveServerJob_33091date.bat€?
€¦ Execute Process Task 2€¦ Executing the process €œ\LiveServerJob_33091 ime.bat€?
€¦
As you can see one of Execute Process Tasks usually receive correct value of the expression (based on values of variables from the configuration file) while another - incorrect one (based on €œdefault€? values of variables set directly in package). Sometimes wrong value appears in Task 1, next time in Task 2. Situations when both expressions in tasks evaluated correctly are very rare.
Then if you add some more Execute Process Tasks with similar expressions in the package (for ex. simply by copying existing tasks) you€™ll get a good chance to catch error like this:
OnError,,,Execute Process Task 1,,,8/17/2007 2:07:12 PM,8/17/2007 2:07:12 PM,-1073450774,0x,Reading the variable "User::FullPath" failed with error code 0xC0047084.
OnError,,,Execute Process Task 1,,,8/17/2007 2:07:12 PM,8/17/2007 2:07:12 PM,-1073647613,0x,The expression "@[User::FullPath] + "\time.bat"" on property "Executable" cannot be evaluated. Modify the expression to be valid.
Seems variable with expression FullPath is locked during evaluation by one of the parallel tasks in such a way that another task can€™t read it value correctly. Can someone help me with the issue? Maybe there are some options I missed which could prevent such behavior of application? Please let me know how I can make the package work correctly.
Am using SSIS to integrate between two database. First one is insert data from SQL to Sybase. its working fine and insert simulatenously. Now need to update table from sybase to SQL with condition(where). How to do this task. Is there any possiblities to execute SSIS without using SQL agent, Â update simultaneously whenever insert new data in both database.
I am attempting to move some SQL 2000 databases to SQL 2005. My main production database does not seem to want to move. When I use the SQL 2005 GUI the .bak backup file is marked 'Incomplete'. When I attempt to restore the backup file I get a 'RESTORE detected an error on page (0:0) in database' message. I saw a thread in the SQL Express forum suggesting trying to restore from the T-SQL level to get the GUI out of the picture and I get the same 'error on page (0:0)' message. However when I take the same file and use SQL 2000 Enterprise Manager it restores with no problems.
Hi, I am trying to edit some data from a SQL2000-datasource in ASP.NET 2.0 and have a problem with a column that has bit-data and is used for selection. SQL2005 works fine when declaring <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter DefaultValue="TRUE" Name="APL" Type="boolean" /> </SelectParameters>When running this code with SQL2000, there are no error-msgs, but after editing a record the "APL"-column looses its value of 1 and is set to 0. Looks like an issue with type-conversion, we've hit incompatibilities between SQL200 and 2005 with bit/boolean several times before. So, how is this done correctly with SQL2000? (I've tried setting the Type to "int16" -> err. Also setting Defval="1" gave an err) ThanksMichael
Hi,i have SQL 2000 and 2005 on same machine(with different intance names,of course), my laptop - XP with SP2. The 2005 works fine but i can'tconnect on SQL 2000. All the the SQL services are started.Any idea? Have i to reinstall 2000?Tks,Lourival
I have to merge the data from two databases, one is in SQL Server 2005 format, one is in 2000. The merged data will then reside on a SQL Server 2000 platform. Is there an easy way to do this through Management Studio or Enterprise Manager? Or will we have to export the data from the 2005 database to a flat file and import it into a new 2000 database. And then do the merge?
I am in the process of migrating from Sql Server 2000 to 2005. Part of my plan is to move some database's to 2005, but use the 2000 compatibility mode for the short term. My issue is this, our DR boxes are still on SQL Server 2000, would I still be able to use our log shipping processes? Or would I be better off in starting with migrating the DR boxes to 2005 first?
I have several SQL 2000 servers I need to setup transactional (non updatable) replication with. The structure is:
SQL Server 2000 as Publisher/Distributor
SQL Server 2005 Standard as Subscriber
The connection is via the Internet with snapshots using FTP.
I setup the first set (2 databases at location A). They work wonderfully. I created the publication and then subscribed using MGMT Studio for 2K5.
II am setting up the same scenario for location B. Here is my problem:
In MGMT Studio I connect to the publisher (SANDRA). I right-click a publication and choose New Subscriptions..., the publication is already selected. I click next - Run each agent at its Subscriber is selected and the only option (this is desired), I click Next
HERE IS THE PROBLEM:
On the Subscriber's screen there are no Subscribers listed. When setting up location A the subscribing server was listed and I could choose a database. The Next button is greyed out and there is no way to create/add one.
I tried setting up the subscription by right-clicking the subcribing server's Replication folder in MGMT Studio but I get the same result (except that I have to authenticate with the publishing server which works fine).
WHAT'S DIFFERENT:
Location A is SQL Server Standard (SP3) running on SBS2K3. It is obviously on a domain and so SQL Server and the SQL Agent are running under domain accounts. Location B is a Windows XP SP2 machine running SQL Server Personal Edition (it actually says Development Edition in the properties window).
The databases are the same strucutre, different data. At location A the firewall is set to allow 1433->*any* and *any*->1433 where *any* is 1024 or higher. On the XP machine the firewall is set to allow port 1433. I don't think this is the issue because I've turned the firewall off on the XP machine and I get the same result.
Most of our sql servers ar still sql 2000. Our programmers created many sql 2000 database diagrams using EM. But they can not access them under sql 2005. (They now have only sql 2005 tools installed on their boxes.)
Question: can we reinstall the sql 2000 client tools on their boxes without affecting the current sql 2005 install on their boxes?
Question: is there any workaround negating the need to ihstall the sql 2000 client?
I'm trying to connect to Desktop SQL Server 2000 from Windows mobile PC Emulator (VS 2005). I need a direct connection using connection string to SQL Server 2000 through local wireless network without IIS.
Bellow is the code that I use. After executing this code I get an error on line Conn.Open(). Error says SQL Server does not exist or access denied. SQL is un and running, and I can log in using SA username from the desktop. Even if I chance IP for another SQL server in my connection string I still get the same error. There is no firewall of any kind running.
Dim connectionSTR As String = "Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=False;Server=192.168.0.202,1433;initial catalog=MyDB;user id=sa;password=;"
Dim Conn As SqlConnection
Conn = New SqlConnection(connectionSTR)
Conn.Open()
If Conn.State = ConnectionState.Open Then MessageBox.Show("Open") End If
About my environment: SQL Server 2000 is running on Desktop PC with Windows XP SP2. Application which I need to connect to SQL Server is in Visual Studio 2005. I execute the application in Windows Mobile PC Emulator and try to connect to SQL Server from emulator.
I would like to ask you if there is better to recreate database structure on 2005 from 2000 and move data or to just load 2000 backup.
Currently I loaded the backup, but I am wondering if there might be slightly better performance on 2005 when recreating structure on 2005 to loading 2000 backup?
Does loading 2000 backup create 2005 binary structure?
How do SQL 2000 service packs play a role in upgrading? That is, can SQL 2000 Standard with no Service Packs(SP) be upgraded to SQL 2005 Standard, or does SQL 2000 Standard have to have a certain service pack??
If we changed the sort order from BIN to BIN2 but kept everything else the same will it have any effect on replication? So in SQL 2005 if I were to change my default collation from Latin1_General_Bin to Latin1_General_Bin2, would that cause replication to break? I suspect that it will not be an issue since it is just sort order that is changing and the code page stays the same.
BTW, this is transactional replication. Sorry, I left that out of my original post.
Hi all.My webhost prepared a server for me with sql 2000 instead of sql 2005.Will my asp.net 2005 application work there?I generated a script to export my sql server 2005 objectsLots of failures appeard.IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE name =N'aspnet_WebEvent_FullAccess' AND type = 'R')CREATE ROLE [aspnet_WebEvent_FullAccess]GOThis is the error:Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 2Line 2: Incorrect syntax near 'ROLE'.The object is part of the asp.net security/login components - I did not create these objects myself!Please tell me what to do next..........TIAGuy
