Very Slow And Not Complete Screen Update In SQL2005
Jan 14, 2008
Hi
I have the following problem (on 2 PC's now)
On 1 pc i installed VS2008 besides VS2005 and SQL 2005 (before i installed VS2008 everything was fine)
On the other is a fresh installed XP machine with only VS2008 SQL2550 and Office2007
Latets service packs are installed
On both machines when i open a table in SQL 2005 with the 'open table' command the show of the table is very slow.
Every row is updated file by field, the grid is not showing, the row and column headers are not 'grey' as normal.
Scrollign is impossible as the screen updates start again that slow.
Even a small table with 10 rows and 15 field behaves this slow. Its not workable.
What can be done to resove this???
Peter
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 27, 2005
I just upgraded my SQL 2000 server to SQL2005. I forked out all that money, and now it takes 4~5 seconds for a webpage to load. You can see for yourself. It's pathetic. When I ran SQL2000, i was getting instant results on any webpage. I can't find any tool to optimize the tables or databases. And when I used caused SQL Server to use 100% cpu and 500+MB of ram. I can't have this.Can anyone give me some tips as to why SQL 2005 is so slow?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
get the following error when I click on prview.
Build complete -- 0 errors, 0 warnings
[rsWarningFetchingExternalImages] Images with external URL references will not display if the report is published to a report server without an UnattendedExecutionAccount or the target image(s) are not enabled for anonymous access.
[rsInvalidMIMEType] The value of the MIMEType property for the image €˜image1€™ is €œtext/html; charset=utf-8€?, which is not a valid MIMEType.
Preview complete -- 0 errors, 2 warnings
This is the URL:
http://air101/airmaps/amsexpress.aspx?sym=bigdot&mlat=42.2446&mlon=-71.1649&lat=42.2446&lon=-71.1649&wid=0.012500&ht=0.012500&mpanv=0&mpanh=0
I've been told that image is a gif how should I set the mimeType?Or is this a security issue of some sort?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2008
Hello,
I've migrated an DB from SQL2000 to SQL2005, all it's working, but i've a "strange" problem, during the night, the transactions become very slow (no specific load) and if i restart service or I change the Degree of parallelims or Cost Threshold for parallelims to another value, it's solve the problem.
In the server logs (W2003) and SQL logs I can't see an warning or error...
In the old SQL 2000 server i've no problem...
If anybody can help me .. :-)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2008
Hi,We have shifted one of our data processing to a new instance of SQL2005. For this a new DB was created in SQL2005 and it is not anupgrade of SQL200 DB.The data processing application is a VB6 application that runs a batchprocess to insert about4.5 million records everyday in this SQL 2005 database. I am usingADO(ver 2.6) Connection object to execute T-SQL insert statements toinsert the 4.5 mill. records.This same application used to insert the data in the SQL 2000databaseand used to take about 2.5 hours to do so. After moving it to SQL2005 the performance has really detriorated and it now takes morethan6 hours.Is there any configuration change that I need to do in SQL 2005?Please help.Note: There is also an instance of SQL 2000 running in the sameserver.TIA,Tawfiq
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2007
I'm querying a small SQL2005 database and finding that the query can sometimes complete in under a second and then 5 minutes later the same query can take 15 minutes to complete.
The query I'm running is very simple as follows:
select TOP 26 * from vSearchListOpportunityItem WHERE OpIt_OpportunityId=2495 ORDER BY Prod_Name, OpIt_OpportunityItemId
The view it is pulling data from only contains only 1890 lines, which in turn pulls data from 3 tables with 821, 2560, and 1957 lines of data. In other words it's small. I have noticed that if I try and open the smallest of these tables while on a 'go slow' period it also takes around 15 minutes to return the data.
The database was originally on SQL 2000. It is the only database on this powerful quad core server.
The SQL Server CPU usage never goes above 40%, and always has free memory.
No sign of locks.
I can't figure out why such a small database is going so slow with such a simple query. Any ideas?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2007
Hi,I wondered in anyone can help with the following problem that i'mexperiencing, i'll try to provide as much info as possible and anysuggestions would be appreciated.I have just started at an organsiation and there seems to be slowperformance maybe on the san on a 64bit itanium dual core machine. 4CPUs are being showed to sql server, it also has 16gb of RAM. I'llstart with the configuration of the SAN.After speaking to the SAN guy, rather than carve the SAN up intodifferent area's for san Logs/Data etc they have gone for the approachof spreading a Vdisk across as many spindles as possible (All 145 ofthem). So the area that is presented to the SQL Server according thethe SAN guys is a vraid 5 stripe made up of all 145 disks which areall 72gb fibre-channel disks.This storage is not just made available to sql server but also madeavailable to other apps as well that need storage. Having read themanufactres best practice on setting this up there is a valid argumentfor doing this.The bandwidth from the SAN is 2Gb fibre, with each computer that usesthe SAN having 2Gb fibre cards.Clearly, that could act as a bottle-neck. But, there's nothing thatcan be done about it according to the SAN guy.Needless to say, any changes on the SAN are pretty much going to beout of the question as far as he's concerned but i think performanceisn't that good for the type of box they have and the SAN its attachedto.The 2nd thing i'll explain is the setup of the database in question,firstly whoever set it up split the database into 16 different file of4 filegroups so the table that i'm selecting to is in one filegroupsplit over 4 files and the the table selecting from is in anotherfilegroup made up of another 4 files. These are placed on the samephysical disk made up of the SAN LUN with 145 spindles.Anyway when i do a select from a sales table which has various groupbys and then insert the results into a blank table with no indexes itcan take over 2hours for 200k rows which i find very slow.When i look at the sysprocesses table i am getting various waits asfollows :-72427200x0042900PAGEIOLATCH_SH 6:9:219209472427200x00690SLEEP_TASK72427200x00000SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELDThe process seams to be going inbetween a PAGEIOLATCH andSOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD a few times per second.Running the following to get io stalls gives the following :-Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,7)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,8)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,9)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,10)gives results like :-67170853985015624218246512844829457222526431245540454412438340307010565449074954240x0000000000000954It worries me that when the process is on the PAGEIOLATCH the waitcan be over 1000. Is it normal for the wait to be this long and whatwould be the best way to prove one way or another if the configurationof the san is causing this kind of performance???Thanks for any suggestions in advanceIan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi There,I have an update statement to update a field of a table (~15,000,000records). It took me around 3 hours to finish 2 weeks ago. After thatno one touched the server and no configuration changed. Untilyesterday, I re-ran it again and it took me more than 18hrs and stillnot yet finished!!!What's wrong with it? I can ran it successfully before. I have triedtwo times but the result was still the same.My SQL statement is:update [all_sales] aset a.accounting_month = b.accounting_monthfrom date_map bwhere a.sales_date >= b.start_date and a.sales_date < b.end_date;An index on [all_sales].sales_date is built successfully.A composite index on ([date_map].start_date, [date_map].end_date) isbuilt successfully.My server config is:SQL Server 2000 with Service Pack 3Windows 2000 with Service Pack 4DELL PowerEdge 6650 ServerDUAL XEON 1900MHz Processors2G RAM2G Page File on Drive C2G Page File on Drive DDELL Diagnostics on all SCSI harddisks were all PASSED.Any experts could simly give me a help????Thanks x 1,000,000,000
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2008
I have an application written in VB6 that creates a ADO connection using the (native SQL2005 clien)t from the client to SQLServer 2005 on Server 2003 configured as a stand alone server. The application works great on XP and has for a number of years.
Now I am attempting to deploy in Vista and using the same code the connection speed CRAWLS. it's in the magnitude of atleast 10 times slower. It eventualy works but the selects and doing a readnext against the resulting record set is at a snails pace.
What am I missing. It's has to be some sort of configuration problem somewhere.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 1999
UPDATE TABLE SET FIELD1=NULL WHERE FIELD2=something - is running veryvery slow. Table has 200 000 recors and on FIELD2 is index.
If number of records to be updated is about 40 000, it takes about 3-4 hours.
I tried this:
- create a new MSSQL DB.
- migration of TABLE from original databes to new test DB
- So, in new DB was only one table, with 200 000 records. Index was only on FIELD2.
- I ran that update and it takes about 3-4 hours
I tried that on Interbase and update takes under ONE SECOND!!!!!!!
Thanks for some notices
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2007
SQL2000 used to send a 2 part update using sp_msdel followed by sp_msins instead of just calling sp_msupd. I thought this used to happen on tables with compostie primary keys. Does any know know if this still occurs in SQL2005 and maybe why?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 1999
I have the following stored procedure that I use for an update. The table now has just over two million rows and the stored procedure takes days to run. I am looking for any help that would produce the same results faster. This runs on SQL Server 6.5, on an NT machine with 4 pentium pro 200 processors and 512 MB of RAM so I am relatively sure that the performance issue is in the below statement.
UPDATE PAY_CHECK_DETAILS
SET JobID = j.JobID
,HROrganizationID = j.HROrganizationID
,JobDetailID = j.JobDetailID
,GLAccountNumber = j.GLAccountNumber
FROM JOBS j, PAY_CHECK_DETAILS p
WHERE j.EmployeeID = p.EmployeeID
AND j.HRActionEffectiveDate =
(SELECT max(HRActionEffectiveDate)
FROM JOBS jj
WHERE p.EmployeeID = jj.EmployeeID
AND jj.HRActionEffectiveDate <= p.PayDate)
AND j.HRActionSequence =
(SELECT max(HRActionSequence)
FROM JOBS jjj
WHERE p.EmployeeID = jjj.EmployeeID
AND jjj.HRActionEffectiveDate =
(SELECT max(HRActionEffectiveDate)
FROM JOBS jjjj
WHERE p.EmployeeID = jjjj.EmployeeID
AND jjjj.HRActionEffectiveDate <= p.PayDate))
AND NOT (ISNULL(p.JobID,1) = ISNULL(j.JobID,1)
AND ISNULL(p.HROrganizationID,'A') = ISNULL(j.HROrganizationID,'A')
AND ISNULL(p.JobDetailID,1) = ISNULL(j.JobDetailID,1)
AND ISNULL(p.GLAccountNumber,'A') = ISNULL(j.GLAccountNumber,'A'))
Thanks for any help or suggestions you have.
Keith
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2007
I have designed a 22 table database in sql server that is to act as a backup/alternate access to the data we have stored in an ADABAS database. I've also written a vb.net console program that will take data from ADABAS through a broker connection (one row at a time), checks the sql server database to see if that information is already stored, and then either performs an insert or an update.
I can write the rows from ADABAS to a text file (not using the broker), at the rate of about 1.3 million rows in 1.3 hours. Data can be imported (I'm not sure how this import is done, possibly via a CSV file. SELECTS/UPDATES are not done, just INSERTS) at about 1 million or so an hour. But when I do the update, receiving information via the broker from ADABAS to the VB program (with it's SELECT, then UPDATE/INSERT), I'm only doing about 20-25 thousand rows an hour.
I ran a trace using the SQL Server Analyzer on the database while running the update program, and then ran Profiler using the generated workload. It created a few indices, but I just restarted the update program (I'm still developing, so I delete all rows from all tables each time I rerun the update), but I haven't seen that it's really any faster.
I have a rather large set of data to transfer over, and this 20-25 thousand row time is not nearly fast enough.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have the following statement that takes quite a long time. Longestof any of my SQL statment updates.UPDATE F_REGISTRATION_STD_SESSIONSET PREVIOUS_YEAR_SESSION_ID = (SELECT s.previous_year_session_idFROM F_REGISTRATION_STD_SESSION R,DS_V4_TARGET.dbo.D_H_Session_By_SessQtr SWHEREr.STUDENT_ID = F_REGISTRATION_STD_SESSION.STUDENT_IDand s.previous_year_SESSION_ID = r.SESSION_IDand s.session_id = F_REGISTRATION_STD_SESSION.SESSION_ID)STUDENT_ID varchar(20) and SESSION_ID char(10) and are indexedWhat I want to accomplish:I want to know if there was a student registration from the prior yearof a registration.Example, if there is a registration for Fall 2004, was there also aregistration for the same student Fall 2003?Maybe there is a better way to approach this?TIARob
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2007
Hi,
I have a table with 110 nvarchar (255) columns in the database. I receive the data from the server (array) and them loop through it to insert the data into the database. The problem is it takes more than 3 minutes to insert (or update) (in memory) the 310 records it got from the array. I am reusing the Statement (with parameters). How could I improve the performance?
It's really a small quantity of data, the CPU in the device is 520Mhz... it should be alright!
Can aynone help me please?
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2006
I am in the process of moving a SQL2000 database to a SQL2005 database.
Porting from: SQL200, Windows Server 2000(SP4) (32 bit dual processor 4GB RAM)
to:SQL2005, Windows Server 2003(SP1) (x64 bit dual processor 4GB RAM)
After porting the database from SQL2000 to SQL2005 (no changes)
I then compare an update statement running from Management Studio on the 2003 Server and and Query analiser on the 2000
Server.
SQL2000 completes the command in 2 minutes SQL2005 is still running after 60 minutes.
SQL2000 is the live/production system with users connected, the SQL2005 is in a test environment with no other processors
running.
The SQL2005 activity monitor shows:
-----------------------------------
3 suspended processes in CXPACKET wait state and
2 runnable process high CPU counts (SQLServer running at 100% cpu).
All processes with the same Process ID.
Wait time is 0
High CPU counts for the runnable processes.
Low physical IO
No lock conflicts
When I add the "option (maxdop 1)" to the update statment then:
The activity monitor shows:
---------------------------
1 runnable process with a high CPU count (SQLServer running at 50% cpu).
Wait time is 0
High CPU count for the runnable processe.
Low physical IO
No lock conflicts
How do I debug this situation?
Why is the SQL2005 unable to complete the task?
The update statement is as follows...
-------------------------------------
update BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS
set [Balance Movement Month] = M.[Balance Movement Month]
from BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS as T,
BI_BALANCE_MOVEMENT_DATES as M,
BI_COMPANIES as C
where (T.[Transaction Date] >=
(SELECT DATEADD(d, - 70, minDate) from (select min([Transaction Date]) minDate
from p_BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS) t1)
OR
T.[Transaction Date] >= C.[MostRecentSnapShotDate] or
T.[Value Date] = T.[Balance Movement Month] ) and
T.[Value Date] <= C.[MostRecentSnapShotDate] and
T.[Value Date] >= T.[Transaction Date] and
T.[Company_Code] = M.[Company_Code] and
T.[Value Date] > M.[SnapShotFromDate] and
T.[Value Date] <= M.[SnapShotToDate] and
C.[Company_Code] = M.[Company_Code]
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
Hi all.
I need your help.
I create a linked server on SQL 2005 server using IBMDA400 as provider.
I create a VBscript to update some data on DB2, and issue begin trans and commit trans. Kindly refer to below code.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Set oKCDat = CreateObject("KCDAT.kcdatapi")
Set objConnection = oKCDat.OpenConnection_SQL(strDataSource,strDB, strUserID, strPassword)
Set rs = CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
strName = "TEST1"
strTemp1 = "2"
strTemp2 = "3"
intTemp1 = 199
strSQLStatement = "SELECT * FROM QS36F.TEST WHERE PRACNM = ''" & strName & "''"
strUpdSQL = "TEST1 = '" & strTemp1 & "', TEST2 = '" & strTemp2 & "', TEST3 = " & intTemp1
strSQL = "UPDATE OPENQUERY(TESTDB2," & "'" & strSQLStatement & "')" & " SET " & strUpdSQL & ";"
objConnection.BeginTrans
objConnection.Execute(strSQL)
objConnection.CommitTrans
objConnection.Close
Set rs = Nothing
Set oKCDat = Nothing
Set objConnection = Nothing
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When i run above script, it prompt me an error message;
"Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server
The requested operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "IBMDA400" for linked server "TESTDB2" does not support the required transaction interface."
If i run it without "begintrans" and "committrans", it update the data successfully.
Does anyone know about it?
Highly appreciated for above matters.
Regards
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
Hi all,
I'm having what you might call an optimisation issue - but I'm also not sure if my approach to this problem is right. I've spent the whole day trying various methods but none seem to be performing as admirably as I'd hoped.
Basically, here's the scenario:
1. Log files are being inserted into a SQL table via Log Parser 2.2.
2. I have a lookup table of ip address ranges to countries and other geographic data.
3. Once the log row has been inserted from Log Parser, I want to update the same log table with data from the lookup table.
The main problem seems to be the updating (the initial insert from Log Parser is lightning quick).
I initially wrote a trigger on AFTER INSERT on the log table that converted the actual user's IP address into IPNumber format using a simple algorithm, then pumped the IPNumber into a quick select query which retrieved the geolocation data. Then, in the same trigger, there was an update statement which basically said:
update dbo.Logs
set [Country] = @Country
where [IpNumber] = @IpNumber and [Country] = Null
Therein lies the problem. The update statement slows everything down to almost a standstill and also seems to obtain a lock on the table.
Critical factors:
1. The log table must remain readable.
2. The query must execute in seconds -- not over half hour :)
I've experimented with various combinations of indexing, so far to no avail.
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated.
Regards
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have two tables:T1 : Key as bigint, Data as char(20) - size: 61M recordsT2 : Key as bigint, Data as char(20) - size: 5M recordsT2 is the smaller, with 5 million records.They both have clustered indexes on Key.I want to do:update T1 set Data = T2.Datafrom T2where T2.Key = T1.KeyThe goal is to match Key values, and only update the data field of T1if they match. SQL server seems to optimize this query fairly well,doing an inner merge join on the Key fields, however, it then does aHash match to get the data fields and this is taking FOREVER. Ittakes something like 40 mins to do the above query, where it seems tome, the data could be updated much more efficiently. I would expectto see just a merge and update, like I would see in the followingquery:update T1 set Data = [someconstantdata]from T2where T2.Key = T1.Key and T2.Data = [someconstantdata]The above works VERY quickly, and if I were to perform the above query5 mil times(assuming that my data is completely unique in T2 and Iwould need to) it would finish very quickly, much sooner than theprevious query. Why won't SQL server just match these up while it ismerging the data and update in one step? Can I make it do this? If Iextracted the data in sorted order into a flat file, I could write aprogram in ten minutes to merge the two tables, and update in onestep, and it would fly through this, but I imagine that SQL server iscapable of doing it, and I am just missing it.Any advice would be GREATLY appreciated!
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2007
I have a linked server set up on my local SQL 2000 instance. I try and run an update against an SQL 2005 database and it take 29 seconds. I checked the execution plan and it says it takes the entire time on the Remote Scan. Is there something I need to do to speed this up? There is an index on the PK that I am searching against.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
Hi
I have an update query that joins with 2 table variables. this update updates about 50,000 rows in a table.
update table1
from @table2 t2
inner join @table3 t3
on t2.id = t3.id
where table1.id = t2.id
the problem is that sometimes this update takes forever. If I replace the table variable with regular tables, it only takes about 11 seconds.
I am not sure what the problem is. Could this be a problem with the tempdb. What should I be looking for in the tempdb that might cause a problem.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2006
Following update runs 20 hours till TEMPDB grows up to 400GB and runs out of space with error message:
Msg 1105, Level 17, State 2, Line 8
Could not allocate space for object 'dbo.Large Object Storage System object: 440701391536128' in database 'tempdb' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full. Create disk space by deleting unneeded files, dropping objects in the filegroup, adding additional files to the filegroup, or setting autogrowth on for existing files in the filegroup.
T_PERF_LOC has 30,000,000 rows and T_MASTER_LOC has 2,000,000 rows
There is and index on V_KEY in both tables. CHANNEL_KEY is of Integer datatype and not indexed.
F_MAP function performs simple lookup on very small table (10 rows)
UPDATE A
SET CHANNEL_KEY = OTHERDB.DBO.F_MAP(b.ID)
FROM T_PERF A
JOIN dbo.T_MASTER b
on a.V_KEY = b.V_KEY
Any ideas why?
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2004
The following basic UPDATE SQL statement has been running for 16 hours and counting. I need to get this done ASAP.
UPDATE Recipients SET UndeliverableTime = getdate()
FROM Recipients
INNER JOIN Domains ON (Recipients.DomainID = Domains.ID)
INNER JOIN Undeliverables ON (
Recipients.UserName + '@' + Domains.Domain =
Undeliverables.EmailAddress)
Is there any way I can see how far this has gone and how long it will take to finish? Will this take another hour to finish or another week?
Both tables (Recipients and Undeliverables) have approximately 80 million records
I did a nearly identical operation with another table that had only 7 million records and it took 10.5 hours. I hope this doesn't scale linearly to 115 hours.
I am tempted to cancel, retune, and rerun but that may be trigger a really expensive rollback operation that could take days. Any ideas?
thanks!
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2014
I have a database with enabling merge replication.
Then the problem is update query is taking more time.
But when I disable the merge triggers then it'll update quickly.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
am using FOR UPDATE triggers to audit a table that has 67 fields. Myproblem is that this slows down the system significantly. I havenarrowed down the problem to the size (Lines of code) that need to becompiled after the trigger has been fired. There is about 67 IFUpdate(fieldName) inside the trigger and a not very complex selectstatement inside the if followed by an insert to the audit table. WhenI leave only a few IF-s in the trigger and comment the rest of thecode performance increased dramatically. It seems like it is checkingevery single UPdate() statement. Assuming that this was slowing downdue to doing a select for every update i tried to do to seperateselects in the beginning from Deleted and Inserted and assigningcolumns name to specific variables and instead of doingif Update(fieldName) i didif @DelFieldName <> @InsFieldNamebeginINSERT INTO AUDITSELECT WHAT I NEEDENDThis did not improve performance. If you have any ideas on how to getaround this issue please let me know.Below is an example of what my triggers look like.------------------------------------Trigger 1 -- this was my original designCREATE trigger1 on TableFOR UPDATEASif update(field1)begininsert into AuditSELECT What I needENDif update(field2)begininsert into AuditSELECT What I needEND...... Repeated about 65 more timesif update(field67)insert into AuditSELECT What I needEND---------------------------------------------------------------------------Trigger 2 -- this is what i tried but did not improve performanceCREATE trigger2 on TableFOR UPDATEASDeclare @DelField1 varcharDeclare @DelField2 varchar....Declare @DelField67 varcharSelect@DelField1 = Field1,@DelField2 = Field2,....@DelField67 = Field67From DeletedDeclare @InsField1 varcharDeclare @InsField2 varchar....Declare @InsField67 varcharSelect@insField1 = Field1,@insField2 = Field2,....@InsField67 = Field67From Inserted-- I do not do if Update() but instead compare variablesif @DelField1 <> InsField1beginInsert into AUDITSELECT what I needendif @DelField2 <> InsField2beginInsert into AUDITSELECT what I needend............if @DelField67 <> InsField67beginInsert into AUDITSELECT what I needend----------------------------------------------IF you have any idea how to optimize this please let me know. Anyinput is greatly appreciated. I do not have a problem with triggersdoing what they are supposed to, they are very slow this is myconcern. The reason I gave you two examples is because i suspect ithas something to do with the enormouse amount of code inside thetrigger. both examples perform about the same whether i use the twohuge selects from the Inserted and Deleted or not.Thanks,Gent
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2006
we just moved a database from a shared SQL 2000 server to SQLExpress on a VPS server. Every thing seems to work great, really no performance loss at all, except for one stored proc that is giving us problems. It's function is to update a history table, and then update the production table. On the old server, it would take less than a second to run this, now it takes anywhere from 45 seconds to 1 minute or it times out. This database is used on a classic asp web app. ANY help at all on this would be appreciated as I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out what's wrong here. here is the proc.
------------------------------------------ code ----------------------------------------------
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
SET NOCOUNT ON
go
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_UpdatePersonalization]
@p_id nvarchar(50),
@cust_num varchar(50),
--@publication varchar(25),
@full_name varchar(500),
@email varchar(200),
@web_address varchar(300),
@include_web bit,
@ReturnAddressYN varchar(1),
@include_email bit,
@job_title varchar(500),
@company_name varchar(500),
@tagline varchar(1000),
@phone1 varchar(30),
@phone2 varchar(30),
@phone3 varchar(30),
@phone4 varchar(30),
@phoneext1 varchar(10),
@phoneext2 varchar(10),
@phoneext3 varchar(10),
@phoneext4 varchar(10),
@phonedesc1 varchar(20),
@phonedesc2 varchar(20),
@phonedesc3 varchar(20),
@phonedesc4 varchar(20),
@company_mail_address varchar(500),
@masthead varchar(250),
@verbiage_page1 varchar(1400),
@verbiage_page4 varchar(2650),
@inc_bbb bit,
@inc_ehl bit,
@inc_eho bit,
@inc_rl bit,
@p_comments varchar(500),
@p_update_flag varchar(10)
--@frequency varchar(50),
--@mail varchar(50),
--@fold varchar(50),
--@contact varchar(50),
-- do not add this on the update! @date_added,
AS
declare @last_updated datetime
select @last_updated=GETDATE()
declare @set_update bit
--if @p_update_flag='False'
--select @set_update = 1
--else
--select @set_update = 0
if @p_update_flag='False'
INSERT INTO pers_main_arch
(
p_id,
cust_num,
publication,
full_name,
email,
web_address,
include_web,
include_email,
job_title,
company_name,
tagline,
phone1,
phone2,
phone3,
phone4,
phoneext1,
phoneext2,
phoneext3,
phoneext4,
phonedesc1,
phonedesc2,
phonedesc3,
phonedesc4,
company_mail_address,
masthead,
verbiage_page1,
verbiage_page4,
inc_bbb,
inc_ehl,
inc_eho,
inc_rl,
p_comments,
frequency,
mail,
fold,
contact,
date_added,
last_updated,
start_month,
ReturnAddressYN
)
SELECT
pm.p_id,
pm.cust_num,
pm.publication,
pm.full_name,
pm.email,
pm.web_address,
pm.include_web,
pm.include_email,
pm.job_title,
pm.company_name,
pm.tagline,
pm.phone1,
pm.phone2,
pm.phone3,
pm.phone4,
pm.phoneext1,
pm.phoneext2,
pm.phoneext3,
pm.phoneext4,
pm.phonedesc1,
pm.phonedesc2,
pm.phonedesc3,
pm.phonedesc4,
pm.company_mail_address,
pm.masthead,
pm.verbiage_page1,
pm.verbiage_page4,
pm.inc_bbb,
pm.inc_ehl,
pm.inc_eho,
pm.inc_rl,
pm.p_comments,
pm.frequency,
pm.mail,
pm.fold,
pm.contact,
pm.date_added,
pm.last_updated,
pm.start_month,
pm.ReturnAddressYN
FROM pers_main pm
WHERE pm.cust_num = @cust_num
if @p_update_flag='True' OR @p_update_flag='False' OR @p_update_flag IS NULL OR @p_update_flag=''
UPDATE pers_main SET
--cust_num=@cust_num,
--publication=@publication,
full_name=@full_name,
email=@email,
web_address=@web_address,
include_web=@include_web,
include_email=@include_email,
job_title=@job_title,
company_name=@company_name,
tagline=@tagline,
phone1=@phone1,
phone2=@phone2,
phone3=@phone3,
phone4=@phone4,
phoneext1=@phoneext1,
phoneext2=@phoneext2,
phoneext3=@phoneext3,
phoneext4=@phoneext4,
phonedesc1=@phonedesc1,
phonedesc2=@phonedesc2,
phonedesc3=@phonedesc3,
phonedesc4=@phonedesc4,
company_mail_address=@company_mail_address,
masthead=@masthead,
verbiage_page1=@verbiage_page1,
verbiage_page4=@verbiage_page4,
inc_bbb=@inc_bbb,
inc_ehl=@inc_ehl,
inc_eho=@inc_eho,
inc_rl=@inc_rl,
p_comments=@p_comments,
--frequency=@frequency,
--mail=@mail,
--fold=@fold,
--contact=@contact,
--date_added,
last_updated=@last_updated,
updated_flag=1,
ReturnAddressYN=@ReturnAddressYN
WHERE cust_num=@cust_num
------------------------------------------ code ----------------------------------------------
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2014
I have a database with enabling merge replication.
Then the problem is update query is taking more time.But when I disable the merge triggers then it'll update quickly.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2007
Hi All,
I would like to know whether it is possible to add and updated date column in a slow changing dimension table using the slow changing dimension data flow transformation.
I would like to keep track of what record is updated in the dimension table based on the data being processed.
Thanks for you help and information
Regards,
Fadzli
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2006
I am in the process of moving a SQL2000 database to a SQL2005 database.
Porting from: SQL200, Windows Server 2000(SP4) (32 bit dual processor)
to:SQL2005, Windows Server 2003(SP1) (x64 bit dual processor)
After porting the database from SQL2000 to SQL2005 (no changes) running the same update statement from Management Studio on the 2003 Server and and Query analiser on the 2000 Server.
SQL2000 completes the command in 2 minutes SQL2005 is still running after 60 minutes.
SQL2000 is the live/production system with users connected, the SQL2005 is in a test environment with no other processors running.
When the problem first showed up the SQL2005 activity monitor displayed CXPACKET wait type on 2 processes with the same pid number. I now no longer have any wait type being displayed but my wait time is increasing rapidly. No block is reported.
I assume that I have an CXPACKET lock problem.
Am I correct that I have a CXPACKET problem and if so what is the resolution?
The update statement is as follows...
update BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS
set [Balance Movement Month] = M.[Balance Movement Month]
from BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS as T,
BI_BALANCE_MOVEMENT_DATES as M,
BI_COMPANIES as C
where (T.[Transaction Date] >=
(SELECT DATEADD(d, - 70, minDate) from (select min([Transaction Date]) minDate
from p_BI_LENDING_TRANSACTIONS) t1)
OR
T.[Transaction Date] >= C.[MostRecentSnapShotDate] or
T.[Value Date] = T.[Balance Movement Month] ) and
T.[Value Date] <= C.[MostRecentSnapShotDate] and
T.[Value Date] >= T.[Transaction Date] and
T.[Company_Code] = M.[Company_Code] and
T.[Value Date] > M.[SnapShotFromDate] and
T.[Value Date] <= M.[SnapShotToDate] and
C.[Company_Code] = M.[Company_Code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2001
In an ASP, I have a dynamically created SQL statement that amounts to "SELECT * FROM Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable WHERE Col1 = 1" (Col1 is the table's primary key). It returns the data immediately when executed.
However, when the same record is updated with "UPDATE Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable SET Comments = 'blah blah blah' WHERE Col1 = 1", the page times out before the query can complete.
I watched the program in Profiler, and I saw on the update that sp_cursorfetch was being executed as an RPC once per each row in the table. In a table of 78000 records, the timeout occurs well before the last record is fetched, and the update bombs.
I can run the same statements in Query Analyzer from a linked server and have the same results. The execution plan shows that a Remote Query is occurring on the select that returns 1 row, and a Remote Scan is taking place on the update scanning 78000 rows (I guess this is where all the sp_cursorfetch calls are happening...?).
How can I prevent the Remote Scan? How can I prevent the execution of the RPC sp_cursorfetch for each row in the remote table?
Thank you!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2007
Hi there,
We have a big problem here with merge replication, specifically whenever a schema change occurs. We are replicating schema changes, and triggers/stored procedures. The example is that we changed about 150 stored procedures and about 30 triggers. This is then replicated to the subscriber database (which is also a merge publisher for further remote systems that were offline at the time) over a 10Mb link - hardly low bandwidth. However, the replication process takes about an hour and a half - considering the SQL on the primary server took less than a minute to run this is a big suprise.
We've run a trace to see if we can identitfy what is going on. There seems to be a great number of calls to sp_MSunmarkschemaobject - we are still waiting for a trace to complete to fully analyse this however it looks like it calls this repeatedly for every stored procedure in the database. We are currently re-testing to one of the remote servers with the merge agent set to the slow profile (not much hope that this will alter the poor performance).
This task looks to be excessive - and certainly does not seem to function in a sensible manner. Has anyone else had similar issues or have any suggestions. This is very infuriating as it means that the servers are effectively offline for a minimum of and hour and a half (in fact the remoter servers take over 4 hours !).
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2005
hi
i try to restore a bak file from another sql2005 server to my sql2005 server, but it show the error message as below :
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express
------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Cannot open backup device 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupackup.bak'. Operating system error 5(error not found).
RESTORE HEADERONLY is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 3201)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.1399&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=3201&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
pls some one can help me ???
thanks
chaus
View 62 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
Can you open/use a database created in SQL2005 in SQL2005 Express?
Thanks for the help!
Max
View 4 Replies
View Related
