View Issue - Where Clause
Apr 8, 2008
Hopefully this is something simple, so I will provide basic information first without going into a ton of detail.
I have inherited a bunch of SQL Views that have recently been moved from 2000 to 2005. The databases were detached and reattached. Everything is running well, except we are having some issues with a bunch of Views.
Here is the general layout of the view, I am not in a position yet to rewrite them (which is what I would like to do) but the ones that are having a problem follow the same general design.
We have a view, that I will call View_A.
Within View_A, we reference View_B and View_C.
So we have one view that takes the results from two other views which are UNION'ed together.
Both View_B and View_C basically contain a select statement that includes around 10 large tables that are UNION'ed together.
I am seeing the following behavior, which is only under 2005.
Scenario #1:
select * from View_A
Result: Returns records in around 5 seconds.
Scenario #2:
select * fomr View_A
where curdate = '20080407'
Result: The query hangs forever and I have seen it generate wait_types (sorry, cannot remember them off the top of my head) but other times it did not generate any. And on occasion, the server processors would spike and we would get an error message in the logs like, "Not enough memory to execute query". I searched for these issues and most solutions to similar problems related to having the latest service pack under 2000.
Scenario #3
select * from View_A
where curdate like '20080407'
Result: Returns records in about 5 seconds.
I have some understanding regarding how operands push differently into views vs. direct table selects, but this is something that functions correctly under 2000. My guess is that this behavior is in place by default under 2005 to prevent really bad queries from bringing the server down. Perhaps the 2000 server has had some configuration changes to allow this to work, but I am hoping that there is a relatively simple solution.
The 2005 Server is SP2 and a MUCH better server from a hardware standpoint.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 21, 2008
Hi All,
I've the following view in my DB and I need to modify it in such a way that it should be grouped by 'categoryId' and display the count of rows that come under each categoryId. In brief, I need to use 'Group By' clause and 'Count/SUM' aggregate function.
Here is my view.
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[MessageCategoryView]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsView') = 1)
drop view [dbo].[MessageCategoryView]
GO
CREATE VIEW MessageCategoryView AS
SELECT
m.subjectSUBJECT,
m.senderidSENDERID,
m.createdateCREATEDATE,
m.completedateCOMPLETEDATE,
m.format MSGFORMAT,
m.isconfidentialISCONFIDENTIAL,
m.queueidQUEUEID,
mc.messageid MESSAGEID,
mc.categoryid CATEGORYID,
cv.label CATEGORYLABEL,
cv.hierarchystring HIERARCHYSTRING,
cv.hotkeys HOTKEYS
FROM
kc_message m
JOIN kc_messagecategory mc on m.messageid = mc.messageid
JOIN CategoryView cv on mc.categoryid = cv.categoryid
WHERE
mc.type not in (3,5)
Can anyone please help me out in resolving this.
Thanks in advance,
Sujatha
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2008
I'm having some difficulties getting sql server replication to properly filter joined tables to my subscribers. I would like to examine the contents of the view the system uses to select the data from my subsidary tables. Unfortunately these views are marked as system views, and I cannot view the underlying SQL clause.
I imagine this data is stored somewhere in yet another system table... does anyone know how I can examine the sql statement of a view that is marked as a 'system view'?
Thanks,
MD
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2006
I have created view by jaoining two table and have order by clause.
The sql generated is as follows
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT dbo.UWYearDetail.*, dbo.UWYearGroup.*
FROM dbo.UWYearDetail INNER JOIN
dbo.UWYearGroup ON dbo.UWYearDetail.UWYearGroupId = dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYearGroupId
ORDER BY dbo.UWYearDetail.PlanVersionId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWFinancialPlanSegmentId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYear, dbo.UWYearGroup.MandDFlag,
dbo.UWYearGroup.EarningsMethod, dbo.UWYearGroup.EffectiveMonth
If I run sql the results are displayed in proper order but the view only order by first item in order by clause.
Has somebody experience same thing? How to fix this issue?
Thanks,
View 16 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2015
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?SELECT Status from lupStatuswith a normal query it returns the correct recordcountSELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Statusbut with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount= -1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
I am working with a vendor on upgrading their application from SQL2K to SQL2K5 and am running into the following.
When on SQL Server 2000 the following statement ran without issue:
UPDATE dbo.Track_ID
SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed
WHERE Processed = 0 AND LegNum = 1
AND TrackID IN
(
SELECT TrackID
FROM dbo.Track_ID
GROUP BY TrackID
HAVING MAX(LegNum) = 1 AND
TrackID + 'x1' IN
(
SELECT
dbo.Track_ID.TrackID + 'x' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(2), COUNT(dbo.Track_ID.TrackID))
FROM dbo.Track_ID INNER JOIN dbo.transactions
ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id
GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID
)
)
Once moved to SQL Server 2005 the statement would not return and showed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD to be the waittype when executed. This machine is SP1 and needs to be upgraded to SP2, something that is not going to happen near time.
I changed the SQL to the following, SQL Server now runs it in under a second, but now the app is not functioning correctly. Are the above and the following semantically the same?
UPDATE dbo.Track_ID
SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed
WHERE Processed = 0 AND LegNum = 1
AND TrackID IN
(
SELECT TrackID
FROM dbo.Track_ID
WHERE TrackID + 'x1' IN
(
SELECT dbo.Track_ID.TrackID + 'x' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(2), COUNT(dbo.Track_ID.TrackID))
FROM dbo.Track_ID INNER JOIN dbo.transactions
ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id
GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID
)
GROUP BY TrackID
HAVING MAX(LegNum) = 1
)
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
2 examples:
1) Rows ordered using textual id rather than numeric id
Code Snippet
select
cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id
from
(
select 1 id
union select 2 id
union select 11 id
) v
order by
v.id
Result set is ordered as: 1, 11, 2
I expect: 1,2,11
if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
2) SQL server reject query below with next message
Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 3, Line 16
A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
Code Snippet
select
cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id
from
(
select 1 id
union select 2 id
union select 11 id
) v
cross join (
select 1 id
union select 2 id
union select 11 id
) u
order by
v.id
,u.id
Again, if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
It reproducible on
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
and
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
In both cases database collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1251_CS_AS
If I check quieries above on database with SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation then it works fine again.
Could someone clarify - is it bug or expected behaviour?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I am looking to create a constraint on a table that allows multiplenulls but all non-nulls must be unique.I found the following scripthttp://www.windowsitpro.com/Files/0.../Listing_01.txtthat works fine, but the following lineCREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX idx1 ON v_multinulls(a)appears to use indexed views. I have run this on a version of SQLStandard edition and this line works fine. I was of the understandingthat you could only create indexed views on SQL Enterprise Edition?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2008
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out
How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2008
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out
How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
Write a CREATE VIEW statement that defines a view named Invoice Basic that returns three columns: VendorName, InvoiceNumber, and InvoiceTotal. Then, write a SELECT statement that returns all of the columns in the view, sorted by VendorName, where the first letter of the vendor name is N, O, or P.
This is what I have so far,
CREATE VIEW InvoiceBasic AS
SELECT VendorName, InvoiceNumber, InvoiceTotal
From Vendors JOIN Invoices
ON Vendors.VendorID = Invoices.VendorID
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2007
Hi guys 'n gals,
I created a query, which makes use of a temp table, and I need the results to be displayed in a View. Unfortunately, Views do not support temp tables, as far as I know, so I put my code in a stored procedure, with the hope I could call it from a View....
I tried:
CREATE VIEW [qryMyView]
AS
EXEC pr_MyProc
and unfortunately, it does not let this run.
Anybody able to help me out please?
Cheers!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2006
I compared view query plan with query plan if I run the same statementfrom view definition and get different results. View plan is moreexpensive and runs longer. View contains 4 inner joins, statisticsupdated for all tables. Any ideas?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2004
Hi,
What is HAVING clause equivalent in the following oracle query, without the combination of "GROUP BY" clause ?
eg :
SELECT SUM(col1) from test HAVING col2 < 5
SELECT SUM(col1) from test WHERE x=y AND HAVING col2 < 5
I want the equivalent query in MSSQLServer for the above Oracle query.
Also, does the aggregate function in Select column(here the SUM(col1)) affect in anyway the presence of HAVING clause?.
Thanks,
Gopi.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
How Can I use Top Clause with GROUP BY clause?
Here is my simple problem.
I have two tables
Categories
Products
I want to know Top 5 Products in CategoryID 1,2,3,4,5
Resultset should contain 25 Rows ( 5 top products from each category )
I hope someone will help me soon.
Its urngent
thanks in advance
regards
Waqas
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2007
hi..
i have basic question like
what is differance between conditions put in ON clause and in WHERE clause in JOINS????
see conditions that shown in brown color
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate,
d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator
from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2
on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID
AND d1.ListType = d2.ListType
AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null)
AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null)
whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND
(d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID
OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL)
OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL)
)
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate,
d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator
from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2
on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID
AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitIDAND d1.ListType = d2.ListType
AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null)
AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null)
whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND
(d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID
OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL)
OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL)
)
another thing...
if we put AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitID condition in second query then shall we remove
d1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID from WHERE clause????
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2008
Hi everyone,
I saw some queries where SQL inner join clause and the where clause is used at the same time. I knew that "on" is used instead of the "where" clause. Would anyone please exaplin me why both "where" and "on" clause is used in some sql Select queries ?
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2000
I had given one of our developers create view permissions, but he wants to also modify views that are not owned by him, they are owned by dbo.
I ran a profiler trace and determined that when he tries to modify a view using query designer in SQLem or right clicks in SQLem on the view and goes to properties, it is performing a ALTER VIEW. It does the same for dbo in a trace (an ALTER View). He gets a call failed and a permission error that he doesn't have create view permissions, object is owned by dbo, using both methods.
If it is doing an alter view how can I set permissions for that and why does it give a create view error when its really doing an alter view? Very confusing.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2006
I have this view in SQL server:
CREATE VIEW dbo.vwFeat
AS
SELECT dbo.Lk_Feat.Descr, dbo.Lk_Feat.Price, dbo.Lk_Feat.Code, dbo.SubFeat.SubNmbr
FROM dbo.Lk_Feat INNER JOIN
dbo.SubFeat ON dbo.Lk_Feat.Idf = dbo.SubFeat.Idt
When ever I open using SQL Entreprise manager to edit it by adding or removing a field i inserts Expr1,2.. and I don t want that. The result I get is:
SELECT dbo.Lk_Feat.Descr AS Expr1, dbo.Lk_Feat.Price AS Expr2, dbo.Lk_Feat.Code AS Expr3, dbo.SubFeat.SubNmbr AS Expr4
FROM dbo.Lk_Feat INNER JOIN
dbo.SubFeat ON dbo.Lk_Feat.Idf = dbo.SubFeat.Idt
I don t want Entreprise manager to generate the Expr fields since I use the real fields in my application.
Thanks for help
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Example, suppose you have these 2 tables(NOTE: My example is totally different, but I'm simply trying to setupthe a simpler version, so excuse the bad design; not the point here)CarsSold {CarsSoldID int (primary key)MonthID intDealershipID intNumberCarsSold int}Dealership {DealershipID int, (primary key)SalesTax decimal}so you may have many delearships selling cars the same month, and youwanted a report to sum up totals of all dealerships per month.select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDMy question is, is there a way to achieve something like this:select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',TotalCarsSoldInMonth * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDNotice the only difference is the 3rd column in the select. Myparticular query is performing some crazy math and the only way I knowof how to get it to work is to copy and past the logic which isgetting out way out of hand...Thanks,Dave
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2006
I was looking through our vendors views, searching for something Ineeded for our Datawarehouse and I came across something I do notunderstand: I found a view that lists data when I use it in t-sql,however when I try to use the statement when I modified the view (viaMS SQL Server Management Studio) I can not execute the statement. I getThe column prefix 'dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit' does not match with atable name or alias name used in the query.Upon closer inspection, I found two ON for the inner join, which I dontthink is correct.So, how can the view work, but not the SQL that defines the view?SQL Server 2000, up to date patches:SELECT dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.aEventID,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nParentEventID,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nUserID,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nColumnID,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nKeyID,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.dChangeTime,CAST(dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.vToValue ASnVarchar(512)) AS vToValue, dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nChangeMode,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.tChildEventText, CASEWHEN nConstraintType = 3 THEN 5 ELSE tblColumnMain.nDataType END ASnDataType,dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nID,CAST(dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.vFromValue AS nVarchar(512)) ASvFromValueFROM dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit WITH (NOLOCK) LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.tblColumnMain WITH (NoLock) INNER JOIN---- Posters comment: here is the double ON--dbo.tblCustomField WITH (NoLock) ONdbo.tblColumnMain.aColumnID = dbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nColumnID ONdbo.tbl_5001_NumericAudit.nColumnID =dbo.tblCustomField.nColumnID LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.tblConstraint WITH (NOLOCK) ONdbo.tblCustomField.nConstraintID = dbo.tblConstraint.aConstraintID AND(dbo.tblConstraint.nConstraintType = 4 ORdbo.tblConstraint.nConstraintType = 9 ORdbo.tblConstraint.nConstraintType = 3)UNION ALLSELECT aEventID, nParentEventID, nUserID, nColumnID, nKeyID,dChangeTime, CAST(CAST(vToValue AS decimal(19, 6)) AS nVarchar(512)) ASvToValue,nChangeMode, tChildEventText, 5 AS nDataType,nID, CAST(CAST(vFromValue AS decimal(19, 6)) AS nVarchar(512)) ASvFromValueFROM dbo.tbl_5001_FloatAudit WITH (NOLOCK)UNION ALLSELECT aEventID, nParentEventID, nUserID, nColumnID, nKeyID,dChangeTime, CAST(vToValue AS nVarchar(512)) AS vToValue, nChangeMode,tChildEventText, 2 AS nDataType, nID,CAST(vFromValue AS nVarchar(512)) AS vFromValueFROM dbo.tbl_5001_StringAudit WITH (NOLOCK)UNION ALLSELECT aEventID, nParentEventID, nUserID, nColumnID, nKeyID,dChangeTime, CONVERT(nVarchar(512), vToValue, 121) AS vToValue,nChangeMode,tChildEventText, 3 AS nDataType, nID,CONVERT(nVarchar(512), vFromValue, 121) AS vFromValueFROM dbo.tbl_5001_DateAudit WITH (NOLOCK)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2006
A colleague of mine has a view that returns approx 100000 rows in about 60 seconds.
He wants to use the data returned from that view in an OLE DB Source component.
When he selects the view from the drop-down list of available tables then SSIS seems to hang without any data being returned (he waited for about 15 mins).
He then changed the OLE DB Source component to use a SQL statement and the SQL statement was: SELECT * FROM <viewname>
In this instance all the data was returned in approx 60 seconds (as expected).
This makes no sense. One would think that selecting a view from the drop-down and doing a SELECT *... from that view would be exactly the same. Evidently that isn't the case.
Can anyone explain why?
Thanks
-Jamie
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2007
Hey guys, I'm a bit weak when it comes to doing ands and or's. I know what i want, but when I put it into statement, i dont get the results that i want.
I have 3 fields in my where clause. ID, LW, and LWU. The code is as follows:WHERE (LASTVISIT BETWEEN '1 / 1 / 95 12 : 00 : 00 AM' AND '1 / 1 / 06 12 : 00 : 00 AM') AND (ID NOT LIKE '%6%') AND (ID NOT LIKE '%7%') AND (ID NOT LIKE '%8%') AND (LW <> 1) AND (LWU <> 'test') OR (LASTVISIT BETWEEN '1 / 1 / 95 12 : 00 : 00 AM' AND '1 / 1 / 06 12 : 00 : 00 AM') AND (ID IS NULL) AND (LW <> 1) AND (LWU <> 'test')
I have a range of dates that I want to grab, in there I do not want any records where ID has 6,7,8 and I only want records where LW does not equal 1. UP to this point, it works fine. I get all the records that only return these values. However, the moment I add where LWU does not equal 'test'. it does not return the values I want. Furthermore, why can I not put this whole string into one and clause? I never understood why I had to create a second line following OR. the longer this query gets the more I get confused. Any help?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2008
I have an insert statement that reads:
SELECT AppointmentID, PatientNo, PatientSurname, PatientForename, ConsultantName, HospitalName, Date, CONVERT (varchar, Time, 8), AppointmentStatus FROM [Appointment] WHERE ([AppointmentId] = @AppointmentId)
I also need to add another WHERE clause. This clause will mean that if the date is within 14 days of the actual date it will not ba able to be selected need help writing this not sure how to write it
Thanks in advance Mike.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2004
I'm having a heck of time with this where clause. I have a table that contains client addresses, a client can have more than one address. So some of the addresses may be seasonal. I need to return only the current address based on a flag MailTo (bit) and a date range, just the month and day, the start and end are datetime datatypes.
Here is what i have tried:
I would really would like it to work on a range of month and day based on the startdate and enddate fields and the MailTo flag.
The table looks like this;
tblClientAddresses:
Address_ID,Client_ID,Address,Address2,City,State,Zip,Country,AddressType,StartDate,
EndDate,MailTo
WHERE (A.MailTo=1) AND (A.EndDate Is Null OR DatePart(mm,A.Enddate) >= DatePart(mm,GETDATE()) AND DatePart(dd,A.Enddate) >= DatePart(dd,GETDATE()))
Thank you for any help!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 23, 2004
Hi,
I am working on a project involving text searching. I created a fulltext catalog on the database and scheduled it for every one minute. I created a fulltext index on a table and added some columns. I scheduled it as the database catalog. I ran a simple query like this in the query analyzer but got an error message that the catalog does not exist!
SELECT * FROM tbl_extra_skills WHERE CONTAINS(ITSkills, 'Word')
What am I doing wrongly?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2004
I'm trying to do a simple ... SELECT ... FROM .... WHERE ... LIKE clause and i think my syntax is off. WHile using sql server ...... is the syntax
Where Name LIKE '%variable%' ??????
Or should I be using something differnent. Thank you in advance for any help.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2005
hi alli need to create a sql statement that receives some values - my doubt is only about how to build that sql statementi've heard something about IN clause but could not apply it - could someone give any sample?First page: I have a textbox with some emails e.g. a@a.com, b@b.com, c@c.com etcSecond page: SELECT * FROM Table1 WHERE Field = ... IN ???thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2001
Hello,
I would like to create a "where in" clause on the fly. For example, if a user types into a text box three email address separated by a comma, I can not do a select on them because they are not strings - (adam@homebusiness.to, wanshark1@yahoo.com, test@test.com) <--- They should be ('adam@homebusiness.to', 'wanshark1@yahoo.com', 'test@test.com') Is there a sql function that tells the server that the stuff in parenthesis is a string? Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2003
we trying to use a UDF in Where Clause. This is taking too much of time. when we replaced the UDF with a subquery the query is fast.
Eg:
select Name, Designation, Address From Employee Where dbo.GetAge(EmpId) > 25
This is taking very long to fetch 12 records from 22,00,000 records.
When the same query has been converted to
select E.Name, E.Designation, E.Address From Employee E Where (select datediff("YY", EP.DOB, GETDATE()) from EmpPersonaldetail EP where EP.Empid= E.EmpId)
this gets executed very fast.
What could be the reason?
Pls help.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2004
Hi,
I'm desperatly trying to make a query (inside a stored procedure which handles diferent tables and columns for each time) on which I have a variable as the table name. The problem is that I cant make it with the variable. What I need to do is something like this:
select @max_value=MAX(COL_NAME(@tableID,@columnID))
from (and here is my problem) @table(or @tableId or something :confused: )
I already tried with OBJECT_NAME but i can't do it, and there's no way i can know the table's name 'cause the idea is to perform the procedure to several tables.
Thanks in advance,
Trillium
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a 3rd party app which generates the following in it's where clause. COnsidering all the ROJ's on this table, would it not be better to put the definitive part
"AND pe.enc_id = '8E487A58-E53A-42B3-8D0E-07AA1BE2E5E5'" before the joins, or does it really make a difference?
WHERE physical_exam_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND
immunization_mast_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND intk_trnf_master_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND vital_signs_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND
med_sys_rev_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND tb_isolation_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND zinmate_encounter_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND intk_trnf_master8_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_head_neck_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_eye_exam_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_ears_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_throat_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_skin_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_cardio_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND
pe_musculoskeletl_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_neurological_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_breast_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id
AND pe_lymph_new_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_abdomnl_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_male_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id AND pe_female_.enc_id
=* pe.enc_id AND pe_proctological_.enc_id =* pe.enc_id
AND pe.enc_id = '8E487A58-E53A-42B3-8D0E-07AA1BE2E5E5'
View 4 Replies
View Related
