View Performence - How To Improve

Sep 13, 2007

Hello,

I have the following view SQL ( LATESTRECALL_v, for communication purposes ):

SELECT REC.RECKEY, REC.RECSTM, REC.RECUID, REC.RECREC, REC.RECLNN, REC.RECCCD, REC.RECSKU, REC.RECSKD, REC.RECPEC,
REC.RECPRL, REC.RECQTY, REC.RECTGQ, REC.RECTAG, REC.RECASN, REC.RECRLC, REC.RECPLC, REC.RECNTS, REC.RECRST,
REC.RECLOT, REC.RECARF, REC.RECVEN, REC.RECIBO, REC.RECSRN, REC.RECPAR, REC.RECINS, REC.RECSDTR, REC.RECDEA,
REC.RECUOI, REC.RECFPL, REC.RECTDA, REC.RECUMN, REC.RECRQT, REC.RECCID, REC.RECCTN, REC.RECFPC, REC.RECEPU,
REC.RECSCQ, REC.RECLOG, REC.RECSTS, REC.RECTDV, REC.RECSHDR, REC.RECRRN, REC.RECWDF, REC.RECWWF, REC.RECSLT,
REC.RECSQT, REC.RECSTG, REC.RECRTG, REC.RECPSN, REC.RECIFL, REC.RECEXPR, REC.RECMFDR, REC.RECMFGR, REC.RECCNO,
REC.RECSC1, REC.RECSC2, REC.RECSC3, REC.RECSC4, REC.RECSC5, REC.RECSC6, REC.RECSC7, REC.RECSC8, REC.RECSC9,
REC.RECSD1, REC.RECST1, REC.RECSD2, REC.RECST2, REC.RECSD3, REC.RECST3, REC.RECSQ1, REC.RECSQ2, REC.RECSQ3,
REC.RECSQ4, REC.RECSQ5, REC.RECSQ6, REC.RECSDU1, REC.RECSDU2, REC.RECRRC, REC.RECICS, REC.RECJOBS
FROM dbo.REC, dbo.LATESTRECKEY_V
WHERE REC.RECKEY = LATESTRECKEY_V.LATEST_RECKEY
Note that it refers to view LATESTRECKEY_V, which is defined below ( the SQL ):

SELECT REC.RECSKU, REC.RECPRL, max(REC.RECKEY) AS latest_reckey
FROM dbo.REC, dbo.LATESTREC_V
WHERE
REC.RECSKU = LATESTREC_V.RECSKU AND
REC.RECPRL = LATESTREC_V.RECPRL AND
sysdb.ssma_oracle.to_char_date(REC.RECSDTR, 'YYYYMMDD') + REC.RECSTM = LATESTREC_V.LATEST_DATE_TIME
GROUP BY REC.RECSKU, REC.RECPRL
Note that it refers to view LATESTREC_V, which is defined below ( the SQL ):

SELECT REC.RECSKU, REC.RECPRL, max(sysdb.ssma_oracle.to_char_date(REC.RECSDTR, 'YYYYMMDD') + REC.RECSTM) AS latest_date
time
FROM dbo.REC
GROUP BY REC.RECSKU, REC.RECPRL
Now, there already is a key on the REC table, columns RECSKU and RECPRL. Adding that index sped things up quite a bit. But this setup is still very enefficient. I cannot apply the indexed view concept to LATESTRECKEY_V or LATESTREC_V because they use "max". I suppose I could apply it to the first view, but since that view depends on the other 2 views, I am not convinced it will improve my performance. Any ideas on improving such a situation? Thanks for your time.


Tony

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performence

Sep 14, 2006

suresh writes "Hi
This is suresh,
I want to know some information about Dynamic sql
what its performense wise?
Difference bitween the proc and dynamic sql?
Advantages of dynamic sql?"

View 1 Replies View Related

Regarding Query Performence

Dec 5, 2007



Here each record have start and ending time ,i want to find the timeleft between currenttime and endtime for each and every records.

Eg: This record end within "10day 12hrs 10mins"

View 4 Replies View Related

I Have A Question With Related To Performence

Jun 25, 2006

i have a single souce table , Table a With contiains records for twodifferent entries for the same vendor by different accountinginstructions,BidId = 10,Person Name=ABC,PersonBidAmt=$100BidId = 11,Person Name=ABC,PersonBidAmt=$110now the recors are to be shown asOriginal Rcds Vs IntutiveRecordsOrName,OrAmt,IntName,IntAmtABC,100,ABC,110for this reason i useSelect A.name,A.Amt,B.name,B.Amtfrom AleftOuterjoin B -- There are many reasons why i do a left outer joinbecause i may not have the record in the b side at allbut this is causing a very big performence issue as this view is veryhuge.31,000 records on each side is taking 2 minits to work.Could any one help me with this.

View 4 Replies View Related

Query Performence About NText

Sep 5, 2006

Is there any difference between a nText field value='' and value=NULL ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Improve My SQL

Mar 9, 2008

I have the following SQL, which works but I think it can be done simplier. I seem to have to group it by multiple columns, but I am sure there must be a way of grouping the results by a single column. Any Ideas?

Code:


SELECT count(order_items.order_id) as treenum, orders.order_id, orders.order_date,
orders.cust_order, orders.del_date, orders.confirmed, orders.del_addr
FROM orders, order_items
WHERE orders.order_id = order_items.order_id GROUP by orders.order_id, orders.order_date
, orders.cust_order, orders.del_date, orders.confirmed, orders.del_addr
ORDER BY orders.order_id DESC

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Improve This Transaction

Jul 12, 2006

Hello,
 
 
I have four different transactions such as below and I do one insert and one update in each transaction and it seem it is slow and creates deadlock with the user interface.
 
These transactions are performed against the tables that users are accessing with another user interface. I have following two questions:
 
1. T2.TextField1 and TextField2 = @TextField2 are Ok, Nok fields so I did not put index since only two distinct values. Should I put indexes on these fields?
 
2. Can I make this transaction let user interface do its task in case accessing the same rows, I can start transaction again but I do not want users get disturbed?
.
 
BEGIN TRANSACTION pTrans
BEGIN
   INSERT INTO T1
                      (fields)
   SELECT     (fields)
   FROM         T2 INNER JOIN View1 ON T2.TrID = View1.MyTableID
   WHERE (T2.TextField1 = @TrType AND T2.TextField2 = @TextField2)
 
   UPDATE    T2
   SET              TextField2 = 'Ok',  TextField2Date=@MyRunDateTime
   FROM         T2
   WHERE (TextField1 = @TrType AND TextField2 = @TextField2)
 
  IF @@ERROR <> 0
  BEGIN
     rollback transaction pTrans
     return(-1)
  END
  ELSE
  BEGIN
     commit transaction pTrans
  END
END

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Improve This Query, Thanks

Nov 29, 2006

I have a pretty good db server with four CPUs, it has not any other loads on it, but the following query takes 4ms to return. I use the syscolumns this way quite often, I am not sure why it takes it that long to return, any idea? 
select 'master',id,colid,name,xtype,length,xprec,xscale,status from [ablestatic].[dbo].syscolumns where id=(select id from [ablestatic].[dbo].sysobjects where name='link_data_ezregs')
 

View 6 Replies View Related

Way To Improve SQL Skills

Jul 11, 2006

hi, have a nice day to all , can some expert here point out what are the do and don't when we writing query ? ie:should we create many view as handler to get data? when should we use store procedure and trigger ? and so on

i seeking the way to improve my sql skill, can someone suggest some reference site or material or book as well ?

thank you very much for helping

View 2 Replies View Related

Improve This Function

Nov 30, 2005

I wrote the following function a few years ago - before I learned about SQL's PATINDEX function. It might be possible to check for a valid email address syntax with a single PATINDEX string which could replace the entire body of hte function below.

Is anyone is interested in taking a crack at it?

Signed... lazy Sam

CREATE FUNCTION dbo.EmailIsValid (@Email varchar (100))
/*
RETURN 1 if @Email contains a valid email address syntax, ELSE RETURN 0
*/

RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @atpos int, @dotpos int

SET @Email = LTRIM(RTRIM(IsNull(@Email, ''))) -- remove leading and trailing blanks

IF LEN(@Email) = 0 RETURN(0) -- nothing to validate

SET @atpos = charindex('@',@Email) -- position of first (hopefully only) @

IF @atpos <= 1 OR @atpos = LEN(@Email) RETURN(0) -- @ is neither 1st or last or missing

IF CHARINDEX('@', @email, @atpos+1) > 0 RETURN(0) -- Two @s are illegal

IF CHARINDEX(' ',@Email) > 0 RETURN(0) -- Embedded blanks are illegal

SET @dotpos = CHARINDEX('.',REVERSE(@Email)) -- location (from rear) of last dot

IF (@dotpos < 3) or (@dotpos > 4) or (LEN(@Email) - @dotpos) < @atpos RETURN (0) -- dot / 2 or 3 char, after @

RETURN(1) -- Whew !!

END
Go

View 8 Replies View Related

How Can I Improve My SQL Query

Aug 21, 2007

Hi,


I have this SQL query that can take too long time, up to 1 minute if table contains over 1 million rows. And if the system is very active while executing this query it can cause more delays I guess.


select
distinct 'CONV 1' as Conveyour,
info as Error,
(select top 1 substring(timecreated, 0, 7) from log b where a.info = b.info order by timecreated asc) as Date,
(select count(*) from log b where b.info = a.info) as 'Times occured'
from log a where loggroup = 'CSCNV' and logtype = 4


The table name is LOG, and I retrieve 4 columns: Conveyour, Error, Date and Times occured. The point of the subqueries is to count all distinct post and to retrieve the date of the first time the pst was logged. Also, a first and last date could be specified but is left out here.


Does anyone knows how I can improve this SQL query?


Best /M

View 6 Replies View Related

How To Improve This Transaction

Jul 12, 2006

Hello,


I have four different transactions such as below and I do one insert and one update in each transaction and it seem it is slow and creates deadlock with the user interface.

These transactions are performed against the tables that users are accessing with another user interface. I have following two questions:

1. T2.TextField1 and TextField2 = @TextField2 are Ok, Nok fields so I did not put index since only two distinct values. Should I put indexes on these fields?

2. Can I make this transaction let user interface do its task in case accessing the same rows, I can start transaction again but I do not want users get disturbed?
.

BEGIN TRANSACTION pTrans
BEGIN
INSERT INTO T1
(fields)
SELECT (fields)
FROM T2 INNER JOIN View1 ON T2.TrID = View1.MyTableID
WHERE (T2.TextField1 = @TrType AND T2.TextField2 = @TextField2)

UPDATE T2
SET TextField2 = 'Ok', TextField2Date=@MyRunDateTime
FROM T2
WHERE (TextField1 = @TrType AND TextField2 = @TextField2)

IF @@ERROR <> 0
BEGIN
rollback transaction pTrans
return(-1)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
commit transaction pTrans
END
END

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Improve Update Speed

Dec 18, 2007

hi
  in asp.net,i used sql server to store records.
  in a table has 1 million records,but when i update the record,it is very slowly.
  is "create index" helpful for "update" operation?
  i need help,thanks a lot.

View 4 Replies View Related

Using SQL Profiler To Improve Performance

Mar 8, 2004

Hi,
We have a poorly performing SQL 2000 db. i have just defragged ( the HD, not indexes, these are done daily via SQL Agent) the data files of our server and have not found any improvement in response.
I have now got into using SQL profiler to analyse the server performance. in the results that the trace is returning there are some huge (REALLY BIG) values for the duration and cpu values but these rows have no textdata value returned (ie it is null)

why is this? for these rows, the reads and writes columns are also high.

if these rows are what is taking the cpu's time then how can i identify what the server is doing to make any changes?

any thoughts on what other values i might trace or what action i can take to find the slow down cause?

in performance manager the processors (dual Xeons) are rarely dropping below 60%.


thanks in advance

fatherjack

View 2 Replies View Related

Improve Query Time

Jul 7, 2006

Aside from indexes, will it help if I use multiple filegroups to improve the time needed to query millions of records?

View 2 Replies View Related

Improve Update Statement

Aug 31, 2006

is there anyway to improve this statement. make it short? any input will be appreciated.


update TempAddressParsingTable set ad_unit = case

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),3) like 'apt' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),3) like 'lot'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 4,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,3)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),4) like 'unit' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),4) like 'apt%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),4) like 'lot%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 5,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,4)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),5) like 'unit%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),5) like 'apt%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),5) like 'lot%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 6,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,5)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),6) like 'unit%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),6) like 'apt%%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),6) like 'lot%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 7,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,6)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),7) like 'unit%%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),7) like 'apt%%%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),7) like 'lot%%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 8,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,7)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),8) like 'unit%%%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),8) like 'apt%%%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 9,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,8)

when right(rtrim(ad_str1),9) like 'unit%%%%%' or
right(rtrim(ad_str1),9) like 'apt%%%%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 10,1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1,9)


when right(rtrim(ad_str1), 2) like '#%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 3, 1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1, 2)
when right(rtrim(ad_str1), 3) like '#%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 4, 1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1, 3)
when right(rtrim(ad_str1), 4) like '#%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 5, 1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1, 4)
when right(rtrim(ad_str1), 5) like '#%%%%'
and substring(reverse(ad_str1), 6, 1) in ('', ',', '.')
then right(ad_str1, 5)
else null
end

View 13 Replies View Related

Help Me To Improve My Application Performance

Mar 13, 2007

Dear Experts,
I'm a DBA, Working for a Product based company.
We are implementing our product for a certain client of huge OLTP.
our reports team is facing problem (error: all the reports are timed out).though the queries are written properly, Each query is taking some minutes of time.
I've given the command DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS.
the time immediately dropped to 10 sec.

now my question is :
please suggest me the DBCC commands or any DBA related commands to improve the performance of the application for my reports team.

Thanks in advance.

Vinod

View 4 Replies View Related

Performance And Database Improve Help

Jan 15, 2008

Hi All,

from your experience in SQL 2005 - do i have any free software that can help in improve performance or can help in identifying performance bottleneck. two examples of performance and help that i use usually use are the maintenance plan that do (check DB > reorganized index > rebuild index > update statics) and the second software is the SQL 2005 DASHBOARD for the reporting help.
do you have any other free tools and help that you can give me for performance or any thing that i must have in my SQL 2005 servers.

Thx

View 3 Replies View Related

Improve Performance In Query..

Jul 20, 2005

I have a table called work_order which has over 1 million records and acontractor table which has over 3000 records.When i run this query ,it takes long time since its grouping bycontractor and doing multiple sub SELECTs.is there any way to improve performance of this query ??-------------------------------------------------SELECT ckey,cnam,t1.contractor_id,count(*) as tcnt,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t2 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t2.contractor_id and rrstm=1 and rcdt is NULL) as r1,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t3 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t3.contractor_id and rrstm=2 and rcdt is NULL) as r2,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t4 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t4.contractor_id and rrstm=3 and rcdt is NULL) as r3,SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t5 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t5.contractor_id and rrstm=4 and rcdt is NULL) as r4,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t6 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t6.contractor_id and rrstm=5 and rcdt is NULL) as r5,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t7 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t7.contractor_id and rrstm=6 and rcdt is NULL) as r6,SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t8 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t8.contractor_id and rcdt is NULL) as open_count,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t9 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t9.contractor_id and vendor_rec is not NULL) asAck_count,(SELECT count(*) FROM work_order t10 WHEREt1.contractor_id=t10.contractor_id and (rtyp is NULL or rtyp<>'R') andrcdt is NULL) as open_norwoFROM work_order t1,contractor WHEREt1.contractor_id=contractor.contractor_id andcontractor.tms_user_id is not NULL GROUP BYckey,cnam,t1.contractor_id ORDER BY cnam*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Improve Performance In This Query?

Jul 20, 2005

Hey guys,Here's my situation:I have a table called lets say 'Tree', as illustred bellow:Tree====TreeId (integer)(identity) not nullL1(integer)L2(integer)L3(integer)....L10(integer)The combination of the values of L1 thru L10 is called a "Path" , andL1 thru L10 values are stored in a second table lets say called'Leaf':Leaf====LeafId (integer)(identity) not nullLeatText varchar(2000)Here's my problem:I need to lookup for a given keyword in each path of the tree table,and return each individual column for the paths that match thecriteria. Here's the main idea of how I have this now.SELECT TreeId,L1,L2,...,L10, GetText(L1) + GetText(L2) as L2text + ...+ GetText(L10) AS PathTextINTO #tmp FROM Tree //GetText is a lookup function for the Leaf tableSELECT L1,GetText(L1),L2,GetText(L2),...,L10,GetText(L10) FROM #tmpWHERECharIndex(@keyword,a.pathtext) > 0Does anyone would know a better,smart, more efficient way toaccomplish this task? :)Thks,

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Improve A Sql Sentence With A Clause Not In

Nov 23, 2007



Hello,

I would like to know how can I change a "not in" clause with the same results in a SQL sentence in order to improve the performance of my SQL sentence.

I am working with SQL Server 2005
Thanks,


jmota

View 6 Replies View Related

Improve The Performance Of This Query...

Dec 14, 2007

SQL Experts,

I'm facing a performance issue with the following query...
The Output of the following Query is 184 Records and it takes 2 to 3 secs to execute the query.


SELECT DISTINCT Column1 FROM Table1 (NOLOCK) WHERE Column1 NOT IN

(SELECT T1.Column1 FROM Table1 T1(NOLOCK) JOIN Table2 T2 (NOLOCK)

ON T2.Column2 = T1.Column2 WHERE T2.Column3= <Value>)


Data Info.

No of records in Table1 --> 1377366

No. of distinct records of Column1 in Table1 --> 33240


Is there any way the above query can be rewritten to improve the performance, which should take less than 1 sec...
(I'm using DISTINCT because there are Duplicate records of Column1 inTable1 )

Any of your help in this regard will be greately appreciated.

--
ash



View 7 Replies View Related

Improve VFP Source Performance

Nov 5, 2007


I am not an expert in either SSIS or VFP technology but know enough to get my way round. One anomaly I did discover I thought was worth sharing for all those concerned with getting large amounts of data out of VFP in as short a time as possible. When you search for performance tips in relation to SSIS the advice is to never use select table or view from data access mode list in ole db source as this effectively translates to select * from table and I've never come across anything to contradict this €“ well I am and let me explain why:

When you use SQL command as data access mode in ole db source (where ole db source is foxpro dbc) and you write out select column1, column 2 etc etc from table a etc etc and then connect that to a destination (in my case ole db destination) the SSIS task spends ages stuck on Pre-execute before anything happens (the bigger the fox tbl the longer the wait). What is happening behind scenes is that the foxpro engine (assuming its foxpro engine and not sql engine €“ either way don€™t think it matters too much) is executing the sql command and then writing results to a tmp (temp) file on your local temp folder €“ (in my case : C:Documents and SettingsautologinLocal SettingsTemp1). These files take up gigs of space and it is only when this process is complete does the SSIS task actually finish the Pre-execute and start the data transfer process. I couldn€™t understand a) why my packages were stuck on pre-execute for such long times? and b) why were the tmp files being created and why they were soo big?

If you change from SQL command in source to Table or view and then select your table from list the SSIS task when executed kicks off immediately and doesn€™t get stuck on pre-execute nor create any tmp files €“ so you save time and disk space. The difference in time is immense and if like me you were really frustrated with poor performance when extracting from VFP now you know why.

Btw maybe this does not apply to all versions of VFP but it certainly does to v7.

View 6 Replies View Related

How To Improve The Efficience Of Sql Query ?

Nov 8, 2006

now i want to get results from server tables, but i found it is very slow, for example :

select Coalesce(T1.Name, T2.Name, T3.Name), T1.M1, T2.M2, T3.M3

from T1

full outer join T2

on Coalesce(T1.Name, NULL) = T2.Name

full outer join T3

on Coalesce(T1.Name, T2.Name) = T3.Name

in Tables i have builded index for name, but when every table have 20000 records, the sql above is very slow, is there other method to improve the query speed ?



Thks

View 3 Replies View Related

Help: How To Improve The Speed Of Sync.

Feb 7, 2007

I have a table which has around 132000 rows with 24 columns. I use rda.pull download the data to PDA. For query these data, I must create a index on 5 character columns.

The data download time is good enough, around 4 mins. But it takes 12mins to create the index.

Please help to give me any idea on how to improve the whole synchroniztion speed. Thanks!

View 6 Replies View Related

Query Help To Improve Performance

Jan 2, 2008



Hi,
I have database D1 which contains 5 million users and one more database D2 having 95k Users.
i wanted to insert common users into new database D3 based on filter which is Phone number and is unique value. Below is the structure of my tables in D1 and D2:

D1(database)
UserProfiles(Table)
UserId (Column Name)
UserProfiledata (Column Name)


D2 (database)
Alerts (Table)
PhoneNumbers (ColumnName - Unique)


Now userProfiles table contains data in string format as below:
User.state AA User.City CC User.Pin 1234 User.phonenumber 987654

so iam parsing for each user using cursor and writing phone numbers into some temp table and wanted to query D2 database to verify whether this phone number exists in Alerts Table of D2 database.

can anyone please suggest on how i can go ahead with this and also help me on how to improve perfomance.

Thanks,
-Veera

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Improve This Stored Procedure

Sep 9, 2007

-- Search orders which meet @empDefId

ALTER PROCEDURE SearchOrders
@empDefId nvarchar(50)
AS
declare @ctmId int
select @ctmId=customerid from customers where employeedefineid=@empDefId


select * from producedetails where orderid in
(select orderid from orders where customerid=@ctmId) -- this query executes three times!
order by orderid

select * from producecautions where orderid in
(select orderid from orders where customerid=@ctmId)
order by orderid


select * from orders where customerid=@ctmId order by orderid

RETURN

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Improve Package Stability

Jan 26, 2007

I submit a SSIS package with data flow task by DTEXEC command on a W2k3 SP4 server installed SQL2005 EE SP1 several time. The package sometimes finish the task successfully but sometimes failed.

I would like to know how to improve the stability of running package. The server is not busy for other tasks. The resource should enough to run my task. It is strange.

Thanks.





View 3 Replies View Related

How To Improve The Speed Of Sort?

Nov 15, 2006

i have found the speed of sort is very slow in my sql (because sql is very complicated, i can't paste it on this page), how can i improve the speed of sort ?

are there better methods?



thks

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Improve Performance If Inner Join Has More Than 2 Or 3 Tables

Aug 15, 2006

Hi everyone
     I need a solution for this query. It is working fine for 2 tables but when there are 1000's of records in each table and query has more than 2 tables. The process never ends.
Here is the query
(select siqPid= 1007, t1.Gmt909Time as GmtTime,(t1.engValue+t2.engValue+t3.engValue+t4.engValue) as EngValue,
 t1.Loc1Time as locTime,t1.msgId
 into #temp5
 from #temp1 as t1,#temp2 as t2,#temp3 as t3,#temp4 as t4
 where t1.Loc1Time = t2.Loc1Time and t2.Loc1Time = t3.Loc1Time and t3.Loc1Time = t4.Loc1Time)
 I was trying to do something with this query.
 
But the engValues cant be summed up. and if I add that in the query, the query isnt compiling.
(select siqPid= 1007, t1.Gmt909Time as GmtTime,
 t1.Loc1Time as locTime,t1.msgId,(t1.engValue+t2.engValue+t3.engValue+t4.engValue) as engValue
 --into #temp5
 from #temp1 as t1
 where exists
(Select 1
  from #temp2 as t2
 where t1.Loc1Time = t2.Loc1Time and
  exists
(Select 1
  from #temp3 as t3
 where t2.Loc1Time = t3.Loc1Time and
   exists
(Select 1
 from #temp4 as t4
 where t3.Loc1Time = t4.Loc1Time))))
 
 
I need immediate help on that, I would appreciate an input on it.
 
Thanks
-Sarah

View 15 Replies View Related

To Improve The Performance Of Update Operation...

Oct 20, 2002

I should add an Identity field (Identity=True) and a row version field(timestamp) to my table, and avoid to arrange tables into different databases, is it true in general?

View 4 Replies View Related

Query Does Not Improve After Tables Defragmentation

Oct 22, 2004

Hi ,
I have
SQL Server with 2 processors , 2 GB memory and RAID 5
40 GB db (Pricing ) working with 3rd party application.

in db Pricing
table A = 180000 rows (20 column and 5 indexes incling clustered primary)
table B = 1789000 rows (25 coumns and 6 indexes incling clustered primary )
table C = 10005 rows (15 columns and 4 indexes incling clustered primary)

Users start complaining about poor performance when selecting data from tables A,B and C

I used profier to capture all queries running with A,B and C tables
where duration more then 1 second.

Profiler shows 0 cpu and very high read for all capured queries

I run INDEXDEFRAG on tables A,B and C

then rerun Profiler

No changes at all in profiler reading
same low CPU and high read

If the is no changes in performance after INDEXDEFRAG can I conclude following
everything has been done to optimize tables A,B and C , query code or table structure should be modified?
or
any other improvment could be done without modifing code?

Thank you
Alex

View 10 Replies View Related

Improve Query Result Time

Jul 2, 2006

Intel P4 3.0Ghz dual core, 512MB DDR memory, and EIDE HDD
15.4GB mdf file with 19 million rows.

How will lessen the time to get a result from a query for this database without upgrading hardware components?

Index, tuning, multiple filegroups, etc.? Btw, this will no longer get additional rows.

THanks.

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved