Hi all, I am really new to SSIS, so may be this is a really simple question, but I couldnt find an answer yet. I need to build a package that 1) counts the rows from a view 2) if rowcount >0 extracts the data into a file
I tryed to do this using a Row Count Transformation in the data flow, but after putting the count in a variable I am not able to perform the "conditional" phase two. I mean that I want to check the value of the variable, but cannot figure out how to conditionally execute the flat file extraction.
Using Row Count, I have to build 2 data flow tasks. Is there a way to do this in a single data flow? May be using an Execute SQL Task instead of row count?
Any suggestions will ge greately appreciated IgorB
I just spent about 30mins searching through the forums for this and saw several posts, but I didn't find a straight answer that seems like it would work for my report. How can I add only 2 data rows to a group (to hide them via the group's visible properties) and keep the rest of the rows outside of the group, but still in the same column (vertical area), as shown:
Having one invoice table (ord) and one 'person' table (actor) I would like to include the name of the person who is responsible for an invoice: SELECT Ord.OrdNo, Ord.Selbuy, AC.Nm AS 'Responsible', AC.EmpNoFROM OrdLEFT OUTER JOIN Actor AS AC ON Ord.Selbuy = AC.EmpNoWHERE ord.ordno = 23505 This works perfectly fine if Ord.Selbuy has a corresponding value in Actor:|26914 |21|Yvonne| 21| or if there is no corresponding value in Actor:|26914 |21|NULL| NULL| But what if Ord.Selbuy=0? Then I end up with 3285 rows from Actor! This happens because Actor.EmpNo=0 is allowed. Persons which have never been employed or used to be employed gets Actor.EmpNo=0.Can I create a SELECT statement which only returns data from the INVOICE row if Ord.Selbuy=0?|26914 |21|NULL| NULL| p.s. I'm not able to change table structure/behavior of update procedures, because the tables/code belong to a "bought from the shelf"-business system.
This should be a simple solution, but it has been a long time since I've done any query writing (mostly in Oracle) and I am stumped, so here goes:
We are in the process of converting Access database to MSSQL with web form front ends.
I have a table, all columns are nullable, and want users to be able to query from a form, which has a field for each column and defaults to a % wild card for the entered value.
I want the users to be able to put any string in any field, and have it return each row that matches that, including rows with null values in the other columns, but not the column with the entered criteria.
Here is a sample of the data:
Code: SQL> select * from test;
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 ----- ----- ----- ----- this is a test this is not test this is not this is test too is test too is too is too
7 rows selected.
Now, if I have this SQL run, it will return only rows that have no nulls in any columns:
Code: select col1, col2, col3, col4from test where col1 like'th%' and col2 like '%' and col3 like '%' and col4 like '%';
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 ----- ----- ----- ----- this is a test this is not test this is test too
Now, if I use an OR clause for each column, this mostly works, but the trouble is it will also return rows with null values for the field that has criteria entered in it:
Code: select col1, col2, col3, col4from test where (col1 like'th%' OR col1 is null) and (col2 like '%' OR col2 is null) and (col3 like '%' OR col3 is null) and (col4 like '%' OR col4 is null); COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 ----- ----- ----- ----- this is a test this is not test this is not this is test too is test too is too is too
The idea is to only select the first 4 rows in the above example.
I was playing with ISNULL in the select clause, but all it does is substitute a string for a null, and I think CASE will do the same thing.
Is there a way I can write this query so it will return rows with NULL values in any column, except the one(column) that has user entered criteria in it?
I have recently had to optimise a site. The DMVs are useful in establihing which queries are taking the longest to run but the data is skewed as it takes into account all queries than have run ever. This is not as useful as profiling a site which in fact I used.
Is there a way to clear all the data returned by the DMVs. This would be useful as all the data could be cleared and then I could just check the DMV every week.
I'm trying to create a trigger that will clear the "checked" field when all items with the same classification have been checked.
The purpose of this is to do cycle counting of inventory, which is when you count the stock levels of a proportion of stock that have the same classification.
The checked field will be used to record the date it was lasted checked and will cleared once all stock have counted, putting back into the pool of stock to be counted.
Therefore, the trigger is suppose to count the number of rows that share the same classification as the amended row, and compare that with the number of rows in that classification, that have a date in the checked date field. When the two values are the same, reset all the checked dates to blank.
But when I tested it, nothing happened ...
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[UDEF_Last_Checked_Reset] ON [dbo].[ASC_PMA_TBL] AFTER INSERT AS BEGIN DECLARE @PartOnly varchar(16) -- Part Number DECLARE @Rev varchar(4) -- Part Revision DECLARE @PartCode as varchar(2) -- Part Classification DECLARE @Last_Checked as datetime -- Checked Date
Hi Im having trouble with this it seems simple enough but its not!
I have a source Table called Access_table example
Name Role1 Role2 Role3 Role4 Role5 a 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 1 0 0 b 1 0 0 0 0 c 0 1 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 1 e 0 0 1 0 0 e 0 1 0 0 0 f 1 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 1 0 0
I need to create a view that basically finds all the names with double Roles and merge the results into 1 row example. Name Role1 Role2 Role3 Role4 Role5 a 1 0 1 0 0 e 0 1 1 0 0
I cannot change the information in the source table and the results need to be in a view as the roles will change. Every time I try and do this I duplicate the row again. Can anybody suggest a solution.
Hi, i have a Stored Procedure that is calling a view. I need to pass on all the records of this view so i made another view that returns the rows count and then a for loop from 0 to count-1. But then how can i access the rows and columns of the view one by one? Any idea? And if someone has a better logic that gives the same result please let me know. Thanks...
Hi, my name's John and this is my first post here at SQL team. I've learnt a lot from the forums here, never needed to post though. I'm pretty good at sql, but not that good and I think for the first time in couple of years I now have a query that I'm completely unable to create. Let me explain the setup. I've got three tables e.g.
This basically shows a simple setup showing that product (computer) has been done the action "repaired" and product (printer) has been done the action "changed motherboard". The query i'd like to have is where I can select all products that have not been performed on cerrtain actions. e.g. a list of products that have not been performed on all actions, such as
select productid from products where productid not in (select productid from productperformedactions....
which elimiantes products that have been performed an action on, but it also removes it for ALL actions, which i'm trying to avoid. All i want is kind of a cross join, listing all actions, then inverting it, to show all products that have NOT had it performed on them. I hope this makes sense.
Help, is something wrong with my SL Server? I am unable to return any rows from all tables in all databases (user and system)on My SQL 7.0 SP2 machine. Whne i right click on the table in E.M and select design or open table i get no results. Does anyone know why this is happening? It did not always happen either. Thanks
Is it possible to insert rows into a view, update rows in a view and delete rows in a view? If so, how does T-SQL handle it when a VIEW is the result of following query?
CREATE VIEW view_name AS SELECT column_name(s) FROM table_name1 INNER JOIN table_name2 ON table_name1.col = table_name2.col WHERE condition
I have one view which is based on couple of tables. Here is the definition of view. Which are the options i can use to optimize the view for better performance. This is one of the view which causing issue on database.
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[V_Reqs] WITH SCHEMABINDING AS SELECT purchase.Req.RequisitionID, purchase.Req.StatusCode AS Expr2, purchase.Req.CollectionDateTime, purchase.Req.ReportDateTime, purchase.Req.ReceivedDateTime, purchase.Req.PatientName, purchase.Req.AddressOne, purchase.Req.AddressTwo, purchase.Req.City, purchase.Req.PostalCode, purchase.Req.PhoneNumber,
Hi, I am stumped and was hoping someone could help me out. Any help isappreciated.I have a view that looks sort of like this (but with a lot moreentries of course)UniqueIdentifyierColumn1Column21 9999 1002 9999 2003 9999 300What I want to do is to add a column to the view that will contain alist of the values from column 2 where column 1 is the same.UniqueIdentifyierColumn1Column2Column31 9999100100, 200, 3002 9999200 100, 200, 3003 9999300100, 200, 300
Now I want to create View that will have an exploded resultset based on SrvType.
For SrvType 1 and 2 there will be 2 lines per Itemid - One for 'Amount' anod another for 'Tax1+Tax2'. But for SrvType 3 there will be 3 lines per 'ItemId' - one for 'Amount', one for Tax1 and another for 'Tax2'.
I have a few hundred source records like this. Now sure how to achieve the exploded resultset with a View.
I have a simple query that joins a largeish fact table (3 million rows) to a view that returns 120 rows. The SKEY in the view is returned via a scalar function. The view returns instantly if queried on it's own however when joined to the fact table in the simple query below results in a query execution plan that runs forever. Interestingly if I change the INNER JOIN to a LEFT OUTER JOIN the query returns the matched results almost instantly.
Select Dimension.Age_Band.[10_Year_Age_Band], Count(*) From Fact.APC_Episodes Inner Join Dimension.Age_Band ON Fact.APC_Episodes.AGE_BAND_SKEY = Age_Band.AGE_BAND_SKEY Group By Dimension.Age_Band.[10_Year_Age_Band]
I know joining to a view using a column generated by a scalar function is not a good recipe for performance. I also know that I could fix this by populating a physical table with the view first as I have already tested this though I hoping not to have to go down that route.
Why a LEFT OUTER JOIN works and not an INNER JOIN or anyway I can get the query optimizer to generate an execution plan that works?
I am using SQL 2014 RTM (may be it's time to upgrade).
I have the following view:
create view [dbo].[SiriusV_Max4SaleList] as select m.id as Max4SaleId, mt.[Description] as [TypeDescription], CAST(m.[type] as tinyint) as [Type], m.start_time as [StartTime], m.end_time as [EndTime],
[Code] ....
I am thinking I may want to remove CAST for department, category, item later on as I don't really care if these columns would be defined as key for my EF model, but I do want to search by these columns. Anyway, this is my current view.
I executed the following select statement once
select * FROM dbo.siriusv_max4saleList where department like 's%' or category like 's%' or item like 's%'
And I believe I got 29 rows initially. However, when I execute this statement now I'm getting just 13 rows. If I execute just the department like 's%' I am getting 0 rows although I can see in the first result a row where department has s in in.
I guess I keep it here since I've created the message already but now I figured out why I am not getting the expected result. I used the condition like 's%' and not like '%s%' which application is doing.
This is probably a stupid question, but here goes: I am trying toupdate a table differently based on what is in one of the columnswithin the table. For example, I want to set Fld1 to be "On" if Fld2is "A", and I want to set Fld1 to be "Off" if Fld2 is "B". This iseasy to do in two SQL statements, but I was wondering if there's someway to do it in a single SQL statement. Thus far, I have had no luckin figuring out how to do this. Any ideas would be appreciated!!
I need some help aggregating values in a single table, where neither a simple Sum() nor a simple First() function will do... Would like to do Sum(First()) but that's not allowed!
Sample dataset (select * from cs_view):
Gender | Program | Student | Class_Section | Heads | Credits ------ | ------- | ------- | ------------- | ----- | ------- Female | English | Elena | Phys 101-b | 1 | 4 Female | English | Elena | Hist 101-c | 1 | 4 Female | English | Elena | Engl 101-a | 1 | 4 Female | English | Elena | Engl 105-b | 1 | 4 Male | History | Rich | Phys 105-a | 1 | 4 Male | History | Rich | Engl 101-c | 1 | 4 Male | History | Rich | Hist 101-b | 1 | 4 Male | History | Jacob | Phys 101-a | 1 | 4 Male | History | Jacob | Hist 101-b | 1 | 4 Male | History | Jacob | Engl 101-c | 1 | 4 Male | History | Jacob | Phys L-101-a | 1 | 0
Dataset has one row per student enrollment in class section. No trouble summing credits by student or by program (or gender). HOWEVER, aggregate head-count should add each student only once.
Desired table: Gender Program Heads Credits ------ ------- ----- ------- Female English 1 16 Male History 2 24 - --- 3 40If I add a third grouping level, that is, add a student-level grouping to the desired table, First(Fields!Heads.Value) will return the correct student-level head count; however, I don't know how to sum up the student-level group header rows ('subtotal' rows), to aggregate head count by gender or by program.
I think this may be an increadibly simple one, but it's been driving me up the wall. I have a dataset that contains some summary information about a group of companies which i'd like to represent in a report. The dataset looks like this:
I can't figure out how to select a specific field from the dataset (e.g. Company = Company1 and Lead_Type = Internal). This sort of thing must be done all the time, I'm sure I'm missing something fairly obvious. Any posts back gratefully received.
I'm pararmeterizing a SQLDataSource, but I've encountered a problem. The users want all records returned if no ID is provided. So when they first hit the page, they will see all records, then they can filter down to one ID if needed. However, if I add a selectparameter of ID, I have to default it to a value, which won't give the users all records. Suggestions?
I have conditionially visible groups that are show/hide based on a report parameter. The problem is that I also want to have a document label on this group. When the group is hidden a blank entry appears in the doument map rather that no entry at all. Is this a bug or is there some work around. Thanks.
I have a sql server table column that can contain the following possible values. 1. 766/IT 2. 777/HR3. 890/EG4. 012/AS5. Trainee6. Contractor 7. Others I want to write an SQL query grouped by this column, Trainee should be one group, Contractor should be another different group, Others should be another different group and then every thing else ( 766/IT ,777/HR ,890/EG, 012/AS) should be grouped together as one group. Think of it in terms of a pie chart with those groups.
