Hi All,
I have a strange problem, when I define an after update trigger on a view I have a message saying:
"Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 4, Procedure after_update_tblpcl_AnalogValue_Minutely, Line 1"
although I am the owner of the view and its in my DB, but when I make the trigger as "Instead of Update" it works fine.
thanx for help.
PEACE!
hi all,
i had a view in my project, i am inserting a record in to that view(View contains a identity key for a column), with in stored procedure i am inserting a record i am not passing the identity key value to the insert statement. The record is getting inserted,Based on the identity key(i am getting the identity key value with Scope_Identity()) and with that value i am inserting records into another two tables.In this scenario every thing is working fine.
but now i am trying to place a trigger(instead of insert trigger) on the view, when i placed,it is not inserting record into first table,so i am not able to get the identity value of that record and process failed.
how can this achived, let me know.
Is there an automated way of regenerating the stored procedures, views, and triggers? Currently I drop and recreate them periodically to ensure that the dependancies are all correct and SQL uses the best plan. Is there a way to have SQL Server do this for me???
Thanks for any help with this issue...
Hello..
I am designing a Database Application that covers Inventory System. And I am now in a dilemma of chosing which design to track Inventory stock better, in performance, reliability, and error free?
1st Design
PRODUCT TABLE
ItemID
ItemName
Price
QtyOnHand
..and other unique info of the product..
SALES TABLE
SalesID
Date
...etc...
SALESDETAIL TABLE
SalesID
ItemID
QtySold
Price
PURCHASE TABLE
PurchaseID
Date
...etc...
PURCHASEDETAIL TABLE
PurchaseID
ItemID
QtyPurchase
Price
...etc...
and similar design with SALESRETURN+DETAIL, PURCHASERETURN+DETAIL, ADJUSTMENT+DETAIL
Tracking Inventory stock is done by using (update, insert and delete) triggers in each of the DETAILS to update the QtyOnHand in the PRODUCT TABLE
2nd Design
PRODUCT TABLE
ItemID
ItemName
Price
...etc...
INVENTORY TABLE
ItemID
QtyBegin
...etc...
SALES TABLE
SalesID
Date
...etc...
SALESDETAIL TABLE
SalesID
ItemID
QtySold
Price
...etc...
and similar design with PURCHASE+DETAIL, SALESRETURN+DETAIL, PURCHASERETURN+DETAIL, ADJUSTMENT+DETAIL
The later design does not hold QtyOnHand, but only save QtyBegin instead. To get the QtyOnHand, it uses views/stored procedure with Union Query, so it looks like this:
QtyOnHand = QtyBegin + Sum(QtySold) + Sum(QtyPurchase) + Sum(QtySalesReturn) + ........
And at the end of a accounting period, the calculation of the QtyOnHand will be the QtyBegin of the next accounting period.
According to you guys, which way is better in PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY, ERROR FREE, and why? What are the pros and cons of these two?
Thanks a lot.
I am trying to replace object name in views , triggers, stored procs, UDF,TVF etc.I have created a automated script to replace 'dbo.Cust' with 'dbo.Customer' in all objects and generate script as ALTER Statements. some objects are still scripted out as Create. Reason is it has some extra space in between
CREATE TABLE #test1(
[NAME] [nvarchar](128) NOT NULL,
[DEFINITION] [nvarchar](max) NULL,
[DEFINITION_bk] [nvarchar](max) NULL,
[type] [char](2) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
[code]....
Hi,
I would like to use the view of the company data in the following stored procedures
without needing to pass a value into the CompanyID identity column. Is there a way to do this? The following code contains the view, the insert trigger on the view, and the desired stored procedures.
Also, this code is given me problem as well the error message says it cannot convert varchar to int. This code is located in the insert trigger.
INSERT INTO State(StateName)
VALUES(@StateName)
Here is the code of the company view, notice the C.CompanyID it is used in the GetCompany stored procedure.
SELECT C.CompanyID, C.CompanyName, A.Street, A.City, S.StateName, A.ZipCode, A.Country, P.PhoneNumber
FROM Company AS C INNER JOIN
Address AS A ON C.AddressID = A.AddressID INNER JOIN
State AS S ON A.StateID = S.StateID INNER JOIN
Phone AS P ON C.PhoneID = P.PhoneID
Here is code for the insert trigger on the view
CREATE TRIGGER InsertTriggerOnCustomerView
ON ViewOfCompany
INSTEAD OF INSERT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @CompanyName VARCHAR(128)
DECLARE @AddressID INT
DECLARE @Street VARCHAR(256)
DECLARE @City VARCHAR(128)
DECLARE @StateID INT
DECLARE @StateName VARCHAR(128)
DECLARE @ZipCode INT
DECLARE @Country VARCHAR(128)
DECLARE @PhoneID INT
DECLARE @PhoneNumber VARCHAR(32)
--DECLARE @CompanyID INT
SELECT
--@CompanyID = CompanyID,
@CompanyName = CompanyName,
@Street = Street,
@City = City,
@StateName = StateName,
@ZipCode = ZipCode,
@Country = Country,
@PhoneNumber = PhoneNumber
FROM INSERTED
INSERT INTO State(StateName)
VALUES(@StateName)
SET @StateID = @@IDENTITY
INSERT INTO Address(Street, City, StateID, Country, ZipCode)
VALUES(@Street, @City, @StateID, @ZipCode, @Country)
SET @AddressID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()
INSERT INTO Phone(PhoneNumber)
VALUES(@PhoneNumber)
SET @PhoneID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()
INSERT INTO Company(CompanyName, AddressID, PhoneID)
VALUES(@CompanyName, @AddressID, @PhoneID)
END
The stored procedures are here.
CREATE PROCEDURE GetCompany
(
@CompanyID INT
)
AS
BEGIN
SELECT CompanyName,Street, City, StateName,
ZipCode, Country, PhoneNumber
FROM
ViewOfCompany
WHERE
CompanyID = @CompanyID
END
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE AddCompany
(
@CompanyName VARCHAR(128),
@Street VARCHAR(256),
@City VARCHAR(128),
@StateName VARCHAR(128),
@ZipCode VARCHAR(128),
@Country VARCHAR(128),
@PhoneNumber VARCHAR(32)
)
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO ViewOfCompany
VALUES(@CompanyName, @Street, @City, @StateName,
@ZipCode, @Country, @PhoneNumber)
END
GO
All of a sudden none of our merge replications are working. In fact you can't even insert, update or delete and data from the tables in the merge publication. When trying that, we get an error stating:
Msg 550, Level 16, State 1, Procedure MSmerge_ins_E3F43EF8B259476099BBB194A2E1708C, Line 42
The attempted insert or update failed because the target view either specifies WITH CHECK OPTION or spans a view that specifies WITH CHECK OPTION and one or more rows resulting from the operation did not qualify under the CHECK OPTION constraint.
The statement has been terminated.
Currently, the only solution I've found is to delete the publication and recreate it. I'm trying to figure out why this happened. It happened on a development server that to my knowledge, hasn't been changed in a week or so outside of changing the server's IP address. Would that cause such an error to occur?
-mike
I developed a search stored proc that searches all orsome of Procs, Views, Triggers and functions. Would anyone be interestedto see it posted here?Do you have any suggestions about other places, websites forums ...., toshare something I have developed?Thanks you for your response in advancePLease send me emailJoin Bytes! {Remove ### before responding}
View 1 Replies View RelatedFellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies View RelatedThis isn€™t an problem as such, it€™s more of a debate.
If a table needs a number of update triggers which do differing tasks, should these triggers be separated out or encapsulated into one all encompassing trigger. Speaking in terms of performance, it doesn€™t make much of an improvement doing either depending upon the tasks performed. I was wondering in terms of maintenance and best practice etc. My view is that if the triggers do totally differing tasks they should be a trigger each on their own.
www.handleysonline.com
Which is more efficient? One large view that joins >=10 tables, or a few smaller views that join only the tables needed for individual pages?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello.
Newbie here. I've only been using SQL for about a year now and have some minor questions about sql objects that reference other objects.
We have some views which reference other views in the joins. I will call one the primary view and the one being referenced in the joins as the secondary view.
Recently we made changes to the secondary view.
After which the primary views which referenced it would not work because of this change and had to be 'refreshed' by using drop/create scripts which essentially just dropped it and recreated the exact same view. I do not recall the exact error message that was returned other than it seemed to suggest that it could no longer see the secondary view since it had been changed. Nothing in the primary view was changed in any way, just the secondary.
Some here where I work have suggested off hand that this was a recompile of the primary view because the contents of the secondary changed.
My questions are:
1. Exactly why did this happen and is there a proper name for it when it does?
2. The same problem does not seem to occur when we have stored procedures referencing views in the joins which had just been changed. Why is that?
Thanks for any help on the matter. I greatly appreciate it.
Hello,
to make a report easier I'm developing it using a view of joined views of joined views.
Is there any significant performance penalty as opposed to just having one big select?
Cheers.
Hello There,I'm trying to create a view that has calculations dependent oncalculations, where the problem resides is that each time I make acalculation I must create an intermediate view so I can reference aprevious calculation.for example lets say I have my_table that has columns a & b. now I wanta view that has a & b, c = a + b, and d = c + 1.this is grossly simplified, the calculations I actually use are fairlycomplex and copying / pasting them is out of the question.so what I have is my_view_a which makes column c, and my my_view_finalwhich makes column d (however, in my real application I have 5 of theseviews, a/b/c/d/e/)is there anyway I can consolidate all these views into one? I wasthinking of using a stored procedure with temp tables or somethingalong those lines.I just which I can use the aliases that I create for c in d in onestep.any insight would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to achieve this using triggers:When someone tries to delete a row in table A, the trigger should first delete a corresponding row in table B and then delete the row in table A. The reason being that, there is a foreign key set on Table B that references table A. So any attempt to delete a row in table A without deleting the corresponding row from B, throws an error.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello All,
I have to write Trigger for Update,
I have two tables, one is for storing records of current values, and one is for storing history of values.
How to Write a Trigger on Main Table. As we have Inserted and Deleted Tables through which we can find Values, We dont have any Table for UPDATED Values.
Help me.
General Problem
I need to create a set of rows every time a new row is inserted into a table.
Example (I think this would work)...
select @insertedId = column1 from insertedselect @id = column1 from table1 where column2 in (select column1 from table2 where column2 = @insertedId)insert into table3 values(x, y, @id)
Is it possible to do the same kind of thing in a situation where the select statement returns multiple values and execute the insert statement for each of these values?
Also, if table3 was in fact the table on which the trigger acts, would it then be executed for every row created by the trigger?
Sorry if I sound confused. I am.
hi everybody..i tried to put thios loop in sql server 2000 But it is not taking The @ action taken value ,,it is only taking the default value of @actiontaken value.
SET @ActionTaken = 'A'
IF (@AType = 'A')IF @Status= 'O' IF (@KAppInd ='Y' AND @DAppInd=null)BEGINSET @ActionTaken = 'O'END
Please tell me other option in sql server 2000 for setting variable value based on conditions
Hi using triggers i try to insert some values in to my 2 tables: But its showing teh error as "The request for procedure 'Triginsert123s' failed because 'Triginsert123s' is a trigger object." This is my code in back end: sqlcon.Open() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("Triginsert123s '" & txtID.Text & "','" & txtName.Text & "','" & txtRole.Text & "','" & txtDep.Text & "'", sqlcon) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() sqlcon.Close() My trigger is: CREATE TRIGGER Triginsert123s ON [dbo].[EmpRole] FOR INSERT AS declare @Eid as tinyint, @Ename as varchar(50), @Role as char(10) Insert into Emprole(Eid,Ename,Role) values(@Eid,@Ename,@Role) insert into empdep(eid,dep) values(@eid,@Role) Whats the probs?, Plz i am new to triggers help me,
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi All,
I'm using triggers to handle my transaction log to cature inserts and updates. It works fine except if the user clicks on the Save button more than once, the trigger is fired and the record is written to the log even if the record wasn't changed. Does anyone know how to check if the record was actually changed so that it isn't written to the table if it wasn't?
Thank you,
Mike
When I execute a stored proc from my asp.net page, will the results of a trigger be returned to my program?
For instance say my stored proc is:
Update Employees set
(Lastname = @Lastname)
where ID = @ID
And my trigger is:
CREATE TRIGGER tr_Employees_U on Employees FOR UPDATE AS
IF UPDATE(lastname)
BEGIN
RAISERROR ('cannot change lastname', 16, 1)
ROLLBACK TRAN
RETURN
END
GO
It seems like since this is an AFTER trigger that my webpage would actually get a valid return code from my stored procedure however the trigger would rollback those changes correct? Or would the trigger get fired and send it's return code to my webpage?
I'm trying to write an instead of trigger for a view in SqlExpress...the table and views are defined as such:CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Work]( [WorkID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) Primary Key, [ResourceID] [int] NOT NULL, [TaskID] [int] NOT NULL, [WorkDate] [datetime] NOT NULL, [WorkQuantity] [float] NOT NULL, [IsEstimate] [bit] NOT NULL DEFAULT ((0)), [Project] [int] NOT NULL,);CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ActualWork]ASSELECT WorkID, ResourceID, TaskID, WorkDate, WorkQuantity, ProjectFROM dbo.[Work]WHERE (IsEstimate = 0);CREATE VIEW [dbo].[EstimatedWork]ASSELECT WorkID, ResourceID, TaskID, WorkDate, WorkQuantity, ProjectFROM dbo.[Work]WHERE (IsEstimate = 1);Given that, what is wrong with the following create trigger statement:Create Trigger trg_InsertActualWork ondbo.ActualWork Instead of InsertasBEGIN Insert into dbo.Work( ResourceID, TaskID, Project, WorkDate, WorkQuantity, IsEstimate ) values ( inserted.ResourceID, inserted.TaskID, inserted.Project, inserted.WorkDate, inserted.WorkQuantity, 0 );END
View 3 Replies View Relatedl'm trying to build a trigger on a table. The reason for the trigger is to check a certain field for the first three characters if it has ie abc it must update another field in this case loanbook to newabc.How do l write the trigger so that it also check if exists and perform the updates. Please help its Urgent. l've listed the trigger below.
CREATE TRIGGER UpdTest_TRGData
ON Test_TRG
FOR insert,Update AS
IF left('Loan_No',3)='ABC'
update Test_TRG
set loanbook = 'NEWABC'
else
IF left('Loan_No',3)='DEF'
update Test_TRG set
loanbook = 'NEWDEF'
where loanbook is null
else
update Test_TRG
set loanbook =left('Loan_No',3)
where loanbook is null
I'm a bit confused on this bit please elaborate : " FROM Test_TRG t INNER JOIN inserted i ON t.PK = i.PK ".
The PK is on which field? Basically this trigger should ensure that on insertion of o new loan if
The left(loan_no,3)=MCG and its null then NEWMCG
left(loan_no,3)=MCG and its null then NEWMCG
left(loan_no,3)=KVS and its null then NEWKVS
left(loan_no,3)=MFS and its null then MFS
left(loan_no,3)=TCR and its null then TCR
left(loan_no,3)=ABL and its null then ABL
Listed below is what l've tried to do but l'm missing the PK part.Otherwise everything else you explained
in the script is clear. Thanks man its urgent. When l parse the query its fine , but When l run it
l get an error.
CREATE TRIGGER UpdTest_TRGData
ON Test_TRG
FOR INSERT, UPDATE
AS
UPDATE Test_TRG
SET LoanBook = CASE WHEN LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'MCG' THEN 'NewMCG'
WHEN LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'KVS' AND i.LoanBook IS NULL THEN 'NewKVS'
WHEN LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'MFS' AND i.LoanBook IS NULL THEN 'MFS'
WHEN LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'ABL' AND i.LoanBook IS NULL THEN 'ABL'
WHEN i.LoanBook IS NULL THEN LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 )
END
FROM Test_TRG t INNER JOIN inserted i ON t.PK = i.PK
-- Fill in Primary Key or other Join Column(s)
WHERE LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'MCG'
OR ( LEFT( i.Loan_No, 3 ) = 'KVS' AND i.LoanBook IS NULL )
OR i.LoanBook IS NULL
====== Error message =================
Server: Msg 207, Level 16, State 3, Procedure UpdTest_TRGData, Line 11
Invalid column name 'PK'.
Server: Msg 207, Level 16, State 1, Procedure UpdTest_TRGData, Line 11
Invalid column name 'PK'.
I an loading records from a flat file into a table, which is done everyday by a scheduled job in SQL Server 7.0.
How can I make sure that if the job is run twice in a day for some reason that the same rows are not inserted into the table again? Do I have to write a insert trigger on the table ??? If so how can I achive the objective ??
Hi! i have a simple question...is possible to create a trigger who affect multiple tables?
The idea will be something like this:
create trigger mytrigger
on sales, users
as...
of course, this don´t work :)
Hey everyone...
I'm working on trying to figure out how to update the child table from the parent via a trigger. This works fine as long as the value is in the child table. If it's not, then I get my foreign key violation. So, My next thought was to simply put in a begin tran / rollback tran within the trigger... My question is this : If I have multiple triggers on the parent table all based on the update of the key field (and the child tables... some 7 of them) all have FK's, if I rollback one trigger does it rollback the entire transaction? Or just the functionality of that trigger? From what I've read, it appears as if it's the entire transaction... if so, how do I get a trigger to 'ignore' itself or not fire based on a select criteria that i have within that same trigger...
Thank you...
I just tried creating my first trigger and I'm a little bit confused. I am trying to see if certain fields have changed and will do that by checking the values of the fields in the "master" table and the "Inserted" table. I wasn't sure which table would have the old data and which would have the new, so I created the following trigger to help me determine which was which:
CREATE Trigger upd_cost_master On tbl_cost_master
For Insert, Update As
Declare @U_Name varchar(65)
Declare @O_Name varchar(65)
Select @U_Name=I.submitted_by, @O_Name=O.submitted_by
From tbl_cost_master O Inner Join Inserted I On O.autokey = I.autokey
Print 'Inserted: ' + @U_Name
Print 'tbl_cost_master: ' + @O_Name
Commit Tran
To my surprise, @U_Name and @O_Name contained the same values. I though that one table contained the old values and one contained the new. Was I wrong? If so, is there anyway to compare the Old and New values through a trigger?
Chris
Hi,
I'm using SQL Server 7.0. I have an insert trigger on table t05r. I populate table t05r with a DTS package. The trigger is supposed to add the record which was inserted into t05r, into t39r. After I run the DTS package to populate t05r, I checked t39r and no records where added. What is going wrong? Is it that DTS uses bulk copy and triggers don't fire on bulk copy?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Darrin
I have an insert trigger on table A which inserts records into table B.
This insertion into B fails( or may fail ) at certain conditions.
I do not want the insertion into A to be affected because of this. Any ways to achieve this ?
Hi,
I have 3 tables A,B C and Triggers on each table like.
for insert/update on table 'C' calculates sum(xxfield) and updates
table 'B'.
for insert/update on table 'B' calculates sum(yyfield) and updates
table 'A'.
This works fine if I insert rows OneByOne.
Problem :- Doesn't work if I post entries(hundreds) in to table 'C' using a Query.
whats happening. Can anyone help Me????????
How do I know if the triggers on table has been disabled or not. Thanks for your ideas!!!!
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello,
I've update triggers on my table, But for some of the transactions, I don't want the triggers to fire. I know in Sybase there are set triggers off. In MS SQL, Is there any similar commands which will set triggers off for particular sql statements.
Thanks A Lot
Sejal