W3WP.exe Taking Over Server!
Mar 7, 2007
We are using SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services for all our reporting. I have noticed sometimes the W3WP.exe starts hogging memory and reaches to 4 GB and that causes the reports portal to not respond and become really slow and report users start complaining.
We have a Windows Server 2003 R2 SP1, total of 4 GB RAM. We are using a 64 bit OS and 64 bit SQL Server. Is this a known issue in 64 bit version. Whats the resolution.? Will the SP2 fix this issue?
We only have the report server websiterunning in IIS.
The DefaultAppPool settings for IIS are checked as follows:
Recycle worker processes in minutes: 1740
Performance: Limit kernel request queue (number of requests): 1000
We also see intermittent warning and informational messages like the following in the windows event viewer:
A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during shut down. The process id was '5256'.
A worker process with process id of '5256' serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' has requested a recycle because the worker process reached its allowed processing time limit.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 29, 2007
Summary: We host reports off of one server that are accessed and refreshed 24/7/365. On a daily basis, I receive calls about reports taking several minutes to run IF they run at all. (normally these reports take seconds). There has yet to be an actual "error message" associated with this behavior. When I check the server at these times, I will find that w3wp.exe process is taking up about 4G and is causing paging. It seems that once it gets to that point, it will kill itself and all goes back to normal. However, it's a slow death and is impacting business.
We're using MSRS 2005. Hosting the reports is the job of this server--no other applications are hitting it. There is a development SQL db on the box, but not in use at this time. The datasources in most cases are stored procedures housed on another box. The web interface (for end users running the report) is hosted on a third server.
Any thoughts?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2006
HI allI want to take a back of my serverthere is 40 data base into my server and i have to take back of every database every day is there any way which can take back up of hole server at one time.regard
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2002
I have a VB application which uses SQL server as the database and uses Crystal reports for reporting.We are using a stored procedure to create a report and we pass ID from the vb side to run the stored procedure.
In boston the report shows up in 4 sec.But in california it takes 7 min.
We have a very good network(T3).Why it is taking more time in california ?.
Any ideas ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2006
I am running SQL Server 2000 on a desktop PC. Just recently upgraded my PC to 2gig of ram from 1 gig, in part, to try and fix the problem below. Didn't work. Have SP3 installed but not SP4 at this point.
When I open up query analyzer and edit some code, regardless of whether I actually execute the code, SQL server eventually sucks up available and cached memory to the point that my system comes to an effective halt --takes forever to do anything either in SQL server or other applications. In the task manager PF Usage climbs to just over the 2gig memory limit.
I conceptually understand the dynamic memory operation of SQL server ... but why is it sucking up most available memory when nothing is executing?
Is there a way I can release/clear the memory? Ideally, code that coould be run under a stored procedure would best meet my needs. Right now, I am "fixing" by shutting down and then restarting SQL server.
Thanks,
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2007
i buyed hosting for my site , i am using sqlserver 2000 as backend. hosting compony allow to connect to my database through queryanalyzer not from enterprise manager.hosting compony charge me for taking database backup on there server. so i want to know how can i take databse backup from remote sql server 2000 to my local sql server 2000,any tool process by which it is possible to take databse backup at my own computers sql server 2000.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 23, 2003
Hi Folks:
We´ve migrated from SQL Server 7.0 EE to SQL Server 2000 in a 8processors, 8 GB RAM server, using W2000.
All seems go ok, but after reorganizing indexes, when we want to recover free space in the differents files using DBCC SHRINKFILE, that recovers are taking the triple of time than with previous SQL Server 7.0.
Shrinking big files (6GB to recover 1.5 GB), previously taking 3 hours now are needing 9 hours.
Any suggestion or help will be appreciated.
Best Regards.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi All,I am facing problem in MS SQL Server 2000. It is behaving slow forselect statements. It is even slower than MS ACCESS. For example, if iuse"Select count(*) from tbl;". i get the results after long time ifthere is more than 100k rows. What might be the possible reasons forthis??ThanksHoque
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2015
Working on sqlserver 2008 R2
CREATE TABLE OrderRanking
(
OrderID INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
CustomerID INT,
OrderDate date
)
INSERT OrderRanking (CustomerID, OrderDate)
[Code] ...
Looks fine but what I need is DRP with this:
CustomerID OrderDate 'DRP taking care of the gap in the days'
1 '01-01-2015' 1
1 '01-01-2015' 1
2 '02-01-2015' 1
2 '02-01-2015' 1
2 '05-01-2015' 4
2 '05-01-2015' 4
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2007
I'm using a Hemisphere West MSR-152 card reader. I need to take data from the reader and store it into SQL Server 2005 Express. Can anyone give ideas on how to do this (sample code recommendations). I'm using visual studio 2005 express and I code with VB.NET.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2014
We have run into an issue on a dedicated SSAS 2012 SP1 server where the allocated memory is not being utilized, causing some slowness in use, connections, and queries.
Total Memory on the server is 512, and after startup, the utilized memory gets up to a max of 60GB and stops there. Checking the Resource Monitor, msmdsrv.exe is only taking around 39GB overall. With the current properties, that should be at 330GB. Am I missing something in the settings or in configuration that should be changed?
Version: SQL Server 2012 SP1 Enterprise (11.0.3000)
OS: Windows Server 2012 Datacenter - Fully patched and up to date
Databases: 2 Tabular models
Server: 512GB RAM
Current memory configuration:
Hard Memory Limit - 0 (Default)
LowMemoryLimit - 65% (Default)
TotalMemoryLimit - 95% (Default is 80)
VertiPaqMemoryLimit - 60% (Default)
VertiPaqPaginingPolicy - 1 (Default)
MemoryHeapType - 2 (Default)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2007
I would like to know recommendations on automate the following:
1. I want to know how to take data from various sql server 2000 data queries and load the data onto excel spreadsheets in an automated method. Some of the data loaded into the excel spreadsheets load detail data and some load data into pivot tables.
Is there any way that the data can be taken from sql server to the excel spreadsheets using odbc connections?
2. Some of the data taken from sql server 2000 database is loaded into pdf files. Is there any way this process can be automated?
Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2013
I'm trying to move specific data from three linked tables on a source database to three tables on a destination database by generating dynamic SQL INSERT scripts but am getting stuck on the last set of INSERT statements. I don't think I can use SSIS because the source autonumber fields may already exist on the destination side but I could be wrong.
For simplicity, Table 1 (T1) has one autonumber key of PK1 as well as other fields (A1, B1, etc.).
Table 2 (T2) has one autonumber key of PK2 and a foreign key (FK1) that links back to PK1 as well as other fields (A2, B2, etc.).
Table 3 (T3) has one autonumber key of PK3 and a foreign key (FK2) that links back to PK2 as well as other fields (A3, B3, etc.).
Like this:
T1: PK1, A1, B1, etc.
T2: PK2, FK1, A2, B2, etc.
T3: PK3, FK2, A3, B3, etc.
So, I'm able to query the source database T1 to generate my dynamic SQL INSERT statements that will be run on the destination side. I'm also able to generate my dynamic SQL statements to insert into T2 but when I get to T3 I currently am stuck figuring out how to insert because the destination side is unable to match it's FK2 to the just inserted PK2. It throws the below error.
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2007
Hello,
I see the following error on the sql server log of one of our sql servers running sql 2000 with sp4.
SQL Server has encountered 1964 occurrence(s) of IO requests taking longer than 15 seconds to complete on file [h: empdb.mdf] in database [tempdb] (2). The OS file handle is 0x00000534. The offset of the latest long IO is: 0x0000002b09e000
Any idea as to what might be causing this error. Appreciate any comments.
Thanks!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2008
I'm in the middle of developing a Database for a hospital that measures its audits, inhouse operations, and finance. What we currently have and do everyday is collect data from a large database that is real time with patient data, progess, infomation, etc and dump it into a data warehouse that runs on TSI/Eclipsys. We run reports using a number of programs and dump it into Excel sheets that have charts, reports, etc. This Database for which I'm developing won't come soley from the TSI/Eclypsys source, but this is the only source thats updated regularly. I don't want to have in sync with TSI/Eclipysys in fear that every day when it updates data may be lost, not read, or worse won't be up date if there is a problem. My question is is it possible to run a query from Sequel Server 2005 that will take that data upon request using the reporing features on Sequel Server 2005. i.e. What if I need to run a report on measure B in department 12 from Jan 1-Feb 1, instead of being in sync, can I just write queries to take that information rather than double the data and take up twice the space and trouble. FYI, these datatypes rarely change in the TSI/Eclipsys data warehouse. This sure was long question and didn't intended it to be . Thanks for listening and hope to hear back.
Stephen
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I'm taking 70-228 this Saturday.Any advice from anyone who has taken it recently?Thanks in advance,Joe in Florida
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2007
just as we export in db2 database
as db2move databasename export -u username -p password
how we will export in sql server
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
Hello.
I have a query that takes 1,5second to execute, but only 150ms of CPU. The query is quite simple, just one where statement against a clustered index.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 156 ms, elapsed time = 1595 ms.
SELECT column1, column3, column4, ..., column10 FROM table WHERE column2 IN (37, 41, 43, 45, 49, 53, 55) ORDER BY column3 DESC
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=37 OR [u].[searchparamid]=41 OR [u].[searchparamid]=43 OR [u].[searchparamid]=45 OR [u].[searchparamid]=49 OR [u].[searchparamid]=53 OR [u].[searchparamid]=55 OR [u].[searchparamid]=59) ORDERED FORWARD)
I have tried to rewrite the query to an INNER JOIN instead.
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Nested Loops(Inner Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([spal].[number]))
|--Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__search_parameters_lookup].[IX___search_parameters_lookup] AS [spal]), SEEK:([spal].[hash]=-1726604993) ORDERED FORWARD)
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=[spal].[number]) ORDERED FORWARD)
but the query still takes 1,5 seconds.
It spends 59% (according to execution plan) of sorting. 14% for the index seek of the __search_parameters_lookup table and then 24% of a clustered index seek of the __searchtest table.
How come it only uses that small of CPU but it still takes 1,5 seconds? It seems to be reading from memory as well so it shouldnt be an IO-problem?
The index I have on the table is a clustered index on (column 2).
Any ideas of how I can improve this? I have tried with DTA, also with a non clustered index on column3.
If I remove some columns from the SELECT-list the query will execute alot faster:
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 32 ms, elapsed time = 32 ms.
Booth the CPU and the elapsed time goes down and now appears to be more normal.
So there seems to be a problem caused by data transfer.
I tried to do a remake and normalize the table and when I do that I get the query execute with a speed of 400ms CPU and 400ms total. And this is still the exact same result, so why does it only spend 400ms of "rendering" or fetching the data when the tables are normalized but 1500ms when its denormalized?
Any ideas?
I am running Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2006
I'm performing an insert and I not only need to remove the << character, but also need to take one field and dump it into two fields. So in essence -
KAREL>>MONTES
needs to look like
Col1 Col2
Karel Montes
Thanks :)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2006
I have a custom .net application that uses SQL 2000 server. All users are compaining performance issues and white-outs while they are using the application. I am almost certain that it's the SQL server that is the curprit. All the other components involved in the application hardly has any CPU or memory usage when I check the performance in the task manager.
On SQL server, I see that the process sqlserver.exe is taking like 2.8GB of memory. Is there a way to find out which exact SQL query or process is taking so much of memory? I belive there may be a bad SQL process that is stuck and taking all the memory? Is there a way to find out?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
Hello.
I have a query that takes 1,5second to execute, but only 150ms of CPU. The query is quite simple, just one where statement against a clustered index.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 156 ms, elapsed time = 1595 ms.
Code Snippet
SELECT column1, column3, column4, ..., column10 FROM table WHERE column2 IN (37, 41, 43, 45, 49, 53, 55) ORDER BY column3 DESC
Code Snippet
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=37 OR [u].[searchparamid]=41 OR [u].[searchparamid]=43 OR [u].[searchparamid]=45 OR [u].[searchparamid]=49 OR [u].[searchparamid]=53 OR [u].[searchparamid]=55 OR [u].[searchparamid]=59) ORDERED FORWARD)
I have tried to rewrite the query to an INNER JOIN instead.
Code Snippet
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Nested Loops(Inner Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([spal].[number]))
|--Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__search_parameters_lookup].[IX___search_parameters_lookup] AS [spal]), SEEK:([spal].[hash]=-1726604993) ORDERED FORWARD)
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=[spal].[number]) ORDERED FORWARD)
but the query still takes 1,5 seconds.
It spends 59% (according to execution plan) of sorting. 14% for the index seek of the __search_parameters_lookup table and then 24% of a clustered index seek of the __searchtest table.
How come it only uses that small of CPU but it still takes 1,5 seconds? It seems to be reading from memory as well so it shouldnt be an IO-problem?
The index I have on the table is a clustered index on (column 2).
Any ideas of how I can improve this? I have tried with DTA, also with a non clustered index on column3.
If I remove some columns from the SELECT-list the query will execute alot faster:
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 32 ms, elapsed time = 32 ms.
Booth the CPU and the elapsed time goes down and now appears to be more normal.
So there seems to be a problem caused by data transfer.
I tried to do a remake and normalize the table and when I do that I get the query execute with a speed of 400ms CPU and 400ms total. And this is still the exact same result, so why does it only spend 400ms of "rendering" or fetching the data when the tables are normalized but 1500ms when its denormalized?
Any ideas?
I am running Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2007
I dont know what this is called in the technical world. But you know when you do a search on amazon or play.com and the search results contain the first sentance or so of the items describtion rather than the whole thing. How is this done? thanks si!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2006
I have the below query which returns thousands of records. can I optimize the returned result set faster without changing the structure of the database?
SELECT dbo.tblComponent.ComponentID, dbo.tblComponent.ComponentName, dbo.tblErrorLog.ShortErrorMessage, dbo.tblErrorLog.LongErrorMessage, dbo.tblErrorLog.LogDate, dbo.tblErrorLevel.Description,dbo.tblErrorLog.ErrorLogIDFROM dbo.tblErrorLevel INNER JOIN dbo.tblErrorLog ON dbo.tblErrorLevel.ErrorLevelID = dbo.tblErrorLog.ErrorLevelID INNER JOIN dbo.tblComponent ON dbo.tblErrorLog.ComponentID = dbo.tblComponent.ComponentID
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2001
Hi,
I am running this query and it is taking over 3 minutes.
"select * from table1 where CONVERT(varchar(10),dated,5) = '13-09-01' "
Table1 has a column called dated which is datetime datatype.
Any suggestions how can i optimize this query?I tried Non-clustered index on Dated column and time came down to less than 3 but still more than 2min.
TIA.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2004
I have been dealing with an intermittent problem for several months that manifests itself on my computer as well as a customers computer. It is happening so often, upon booting the computer, that I just open and then minimize the Task Manager so that it will be in the Tool Tray and the bargraph will be visible.
From time to time the processor bargraph will "Max out" and when I open Task Manager and click on CPU in the Processes Tab, SQLServr.exe is using 99% of the CPU.
In Enterprise Manager I have set maximum Memory to 25% of the available system memory. I have tried this in both Fixed mode as well as Dynamic mode, no change.
I was told that there was a SQL Server version that was susceptible to a WORM that caused this. I have since upgraded to SQL ver. 8.0.194. I'm not sure of the version that I replaced, but I thought that the previous version was the one that was susceptible to the worm.
Has anyone fought this battle and if so can you offer any experience or advice?
Thanks very much for your help,
Doc
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2006
hi i am taking date from user.
if i want to take only date or only time from user and save into database than what to do?
i am using MS SQL Server which takes datatype as 'datetime' which takes both date and time as value to store in database.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2008
Hi all,
2 weeks ago I deleted about 200GB of data from a 300GB+ database. It's a custom DB we want to use to test few things. We wanted a smaller size DB for our testing and since we didn't have any we grabbed a production backup, removed sensitive data and ran a large archiving script on it... Anyway so far so good but our data file was still the same size as before.
So we started a shrinkdatabase... it has been running for 2 weeks now! After about 1 week I interrupted the shrinkdatabase process and ran a
dbcc shrinkdatabase('DB', truncateonly)
just to see if the data file will get reduced a bit or not. It did get reduced by about 20GB. I assume that
dbcc shrinkdatabase('DB', 0)
has free up enough pages at the end of the data file so a truncateonly was able to free up some space... Anyway after this we started the
dbcc shrinkdatabase('DB', truncateonly)
again... still running...
The database was never shrank before and every index is highly fragmented... Is that why it's taking so long? Am I actually going to have to wait for another few weeks before that thing finishes??
Anyone has experience running shrink on large DBs?
thanks!
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
I have following common table expression query which is taking like 15 hours to run. would someone suggest what can I do to speed this thing up..
; with
a as (select proj_id, proj_start_dt,proj_end_dt, case when charindex('.', Proj_ID) > 0 then left(Proj_ID, len(Proj_ID) - charindex('.', reverse(Proj_ID))) end as Parent_Proj_ID from ods32.dbo.Proj a), --add Parent_Proj_ID column
b as (select proj_id, proj_start_dt,proj_end_dt,Parent_Proj_ID from a where PROJ_START_DT is not null and PROJ_END_DT is not null --get all valid rows
union all
select a.Proj_Id, b.PROJ_START_DT, b.PROJ_END_DT, a.Parent_Proj_ID from b inner join a on b.Proj_Id = a.Parent_Proj_ID where a.PROJ_START_DT is null or a.PROJ_END_DT is null) --get all invalid children of valid rows and give them the dates of their parents
update a set PROJ_START_DT = b.PROJ_START_DT, PROJ_END_DT = b.PROJ_END_DT
from WPData a left outer join b on a.Proj_ID = b.Proj_ID -- join up and update
thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
im rstoring a db the file is 7gig. Its taking more than 10 minuts..
how do i know if the backup file is ok to restore it
=============================
http://www.sqlserverstudy.com
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2007
what can I do?
all queries that used to work are taking forever now???
what can I do?
is there a max size for the db that I may have reached
please advise asap
View 20 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
Hi:
I have issued the following ALTER TABLE CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT on a table which has around 100K rows and it is taking long time (it's been more than 30 mins the alter table is running) to add the constraint. Is this normal or should I kill the process.
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblAbsHeqAnalyticOutputSimulationPathValues]
WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_tblAbsHeqAnalyticOutputSimulationPathValues_1]
CHECK ([dbo].[svfConstraintVerifyTableUniqueActiveEntryFacade]('tblAbsHeqAnalyticOutputSimulationPathValues')<=(1) AND [dbo].[svfConstraintVerifyTableUniqueActiveEntryFacade]('tblAbsHeqAnalyticOutputSimulationPathValues')>=(0))
Thanks !
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
Dear Experts,
i've one table named table11. in this perticular table, i've 30 columns and 40,000 rows of data.
this table is taking 35 sec for select * from table11.
defnetly it will take more time if i used this in some places like procedures and functions or views like that.
where is the problem? generally it takes that much of time or is there any problem?
guidence please.....
Vinod
Even you learn 1%, Learn it with 100% confidence.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2007
Dear All,
here i'm posting my query which is taking 3 minutes
please suggest me the best query
SELECT distinct INP.COLUMN001 REPORT_INPUT_ID, INP.COLUMN002 REPORT_ID, INP.COLUMN003 OPERATION_ID,
OPER.COLUMN004 OPERATION_CODE, OPER.COLUMN005 OPERATION_NAME, INP.COLUMN004 ITEM_ID,
CONVERT(NVARCHAR , INP.COLUMN005, 110) RECEIVED_DATE, INP.COLUMN006 LOT_NO, INP.COLUMN007 RECEIVED_QTY,
INP.COLUMN008 CONSUMED_QTY, (select CODE from view1 where item_id = INP.COLUMN004) my_val,
(select NAME from view1 where item_id = INP.COLUMN004) Item_Name, INP.COLUMN009 UOM_ID,
U.UOM_CODE, INP.COLUMN010 BASE_RECEIVED_QTY, INP.COLUMN011 BASE_CONSUMED_QTY,
case when INP.COLUMN012 ='1' then 'Progress' when INP.COLUMN012 ='2' then 'Closed' end OPERATION_STATUS,
case when INGDTL.COLUMN006 ='0' then 'Ingredient' when INGDTL.COLUMN006 ='1' then 'Intermediate' end INPUT_TYPE,
INP.COLUMNB01 COLUMNB01, INP.COLUMNB02 COLUMNB02, INP.COLUMNB03 COLUMNB03, INP.COLUMNB04 COLUMNB04,
INP.COLUMNB05 COLUMNB05, INP.COLUMNB06 COLUMNB06, INP.COLUMNB07 COLUMNB07, INP.COLUMNB08 COLUMNB08,
INP.COLUMNB09 COLUMNB09, INP.COLUMNB10 COLUMNB10, INP.COLUMND01 BRANCHID, INP.COLUMND02 COMPANYID, INP.COLUMND03 CREATEDBY,
INP.COLUMND04 CREATEDDATE, INP.COLUMND05 LASTUPDATEDBY, INP.COLUMND06 LASTUPDATEDDATE, INP.COLUMND07 ROWGUID,
INP.COLUMND08 UPDATEDSITE, INP.COLUMND09 LANGID, WC.COLUMN009 WIP_WAREHOUSE_ID,
(SELECT (sum(WIP.COLUMN011) - sum(wip.column010))
FROM TABLE066 WIP where wip.column008 = INP.column004 and WIP.COLUMN005 = '8cd741c7-1ac6-4839-88e7-df85518170f1' and wip.column006 = inp.column003 ) WIP_Qty ,
WIPM.Column005 WIP_ITEM_ID
FROM TABLE073 INP
left join view1 I on I.ITEM_ID = INP.COLUMN004
left join view2 U on U.UOM_ID = INP.COLUMN009
left join TABLE022 OPER ON OPER.COLUMN001 = INP.COLUMN003
left join TABLE066 WIP on WIP.column008 = INP.column004
left join TABLE015 WC on WC.COLUMN001 = OPER.COLUMN008
left JOIN TABLE040 INGDTL ON INGDTL.COLUMN002 = INP.COLUMN004 AND WIP.column008 = INGDTL.COLUMN002
left join TABLE065 WIPM on WIPM.column005 = INP.column004
where INP.COLUMN002 = '057f87aa-7884-43fa-8984-9b74c971da62' order by my_val
thank you very much
View 7 Replies
View Related
