Website Using LINQ To SQL Development V Live
Feb 8, 2008
Hello,
I have my local development evrioment and my live webserver in colo. The two different machinces both have SQL2005 and copies of roughly the same database. I use the one for developement and the other obviously for production. Currently I read in different connection strings from my web.config file for my live version v my development version so I can have different database names and connection strings.
I'm looking at moving to LINQ, but I can't figure out how I'd achive an equivelent flexibility as database names and connection strings seem to be hardcoded in to the class using it's designer. Obviously if modifing this wasn't possible, nobody would be using LINQ, so how do I work around this?
Thanks,
Joel Barsotti
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 1, 2007
I am getting a reference problem in APP_Code when I am creaing LinQ enabled website. When I am creating LinQ enabled website at that time it adds some dll like System.Query, System.Data.DLinq, System.Xml.XLinq and in web.config file it adds
<system.codedom> <compilers> <compiler language="c#;cs;csharp" extension=".cs" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharp3CodeProvider, CSharp3CodeDomProvider"/> </compilers> </system.codedom>
automatically. Now the problem is when I add references like System.Query it does not show the Query namespace (It does not show any of the external dll added in the bin folder). And if we comment the
<system.codedom> <compilers> <compiler language="c#;cs;csharp" extension=".cs" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharp3CodeProvider, CSharp3CodeDomProvider"/> </compilers> </system.codedom>
in web.config file it works properly that means it shows System.Query and other refrences.
Please if there is any solution do reply,
Thank You..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2000
I have a problem in that I have a live SQL 7.0 server as a back end to a web server for a large company in Germany and of course we also have a development server locally which is more or less the same apart from data. The ASP developers here want to upload some data to the live server and also download live data from the live server so that we have more or less the same data on both systems.
I have thought about doing this with DTS adn writing SQL scripts to merge the tables and then upload back to the live server etc. but before I do I wondered if anyone had experience of doing this before (I am sure) and could either tell me what are the best methods or package to do or point me or mail me an article that covers this sort of thing.
Of course extreme paranioa creeps in at the thought of copying down large tables from the live server etc. etc. so if anyone can help - great!
Jeff Cresswell in Hamburg Germany
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2007
hi.
I would wish to know whether it is possible for me to program the code from html or aspx ( from web hosting server ) to our office intranet database which is window server 2005?
I had tried to google for more info but there are too complicated thing for me to understand.
Actually i am doing the web form feedback form from the website for the public to fill in and submit. i am using the mysql from web server to store the records from the feedback form.
We have another database in our server, ms server 2005 to store records in the intranet office only. i need to get the records from mysql to intranet database. i don`t think there is a automated scripting which allow u to auto update the intranet database from mysql( web server )
So i thought of one thing . program html or aspx to insert records directly to our database intranet . but how ?
I appreciated that.
Regards
newbie on aspnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2005
I have finished a change request from our client. I need to update clients' database with the one in developments.Here is the changes i made to database:Added/Changed some tablesAdded/Changed some stored proceduresAdded data to some dictionary tableThe data in clients' current database MUST be kept. So how can I merge the changed information to clients' database?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2007
Please can anybody help me in transferring existing SSIS Packages saved in a shared folder location from development server 2ED to Live server TWD1.
Both has SQL server 2005 running and has visual studio 2005
Currently about 25 SSIS packages are executed from the development server transferring data on Live server TWD1...these ETL process is called from development server but executed on live server.
Now the problem is when i call these packages from the shared folder from live server it crashes.....i need to changes something to shift the whole package to the live server..and execute on live server itself instead of recreating the whole 25 process from scratch.....also i use optimize for many tables ..and run in a single trancastion....so how can i see the mappings of source and destination tables.
Please let me know the process how i can achieve this.
Thanks
George
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2001
can anyone tell me if they know of a way to automate the update process from development servers to live server, with little interference from an administrator
I have a development team that are constantly updating their databases along with their ASP code, and want to publish changes an a weekly basis. They have asked me for a way to take their new structures, tables, procedures etc, and copy them to the live servers, but NOT to interfere with existing customer data.
Funny I know – and I hate the idea btw :(
Any references, contacts, 3rd party tool recommendations welcome,
Thanx,
Darren
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2007
Hi,
Im fairly new to this so apologies if Ive put this in the wrong place.
I have just rented out server for a new asp.net site. Ive been developing the site on my local machine and the database in Sql Enterprise. Ive recently put a copy of the site on the live server and got everything configured.
However everytime I make a change to my local database, or add values into my look up tables I have to go do the same on the live server and its proving a bit of a pain in the ass, so Im guessing there has got to be a much smarter way of doing this. I dont want (if possible) to open up the live sql server to allow remote connections, but if thats what neccesary so be it.
So my question is basically what are my options for keeping my live server up to date with my development server. As I add new features on my local server, should i be saving sql scripts of all the changes I make?
All opinions much appreciated.
C
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2008
Hello!
I try to get a list of ConditionsVersion where Version is MAX for each ConditionsVersion.
I tried something like this (as seen on http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vcsharp/aa336747.aspx#maxGrouped):
1 List<ConditionsVersion> list = (from cv in ConditionsVersions2 group cv by cv.FKConditions into cv3 select new { 4 PKConditions = cv.PKConditions,5 FKConditions = cv.FKConditions,6 MaxVersion = cv.GroupBy.Max(cv => cv.Version)7 CTimestamp = cv.Timestamp8 }).ToList();
But it doesn't work. It would be great if someone knows why.
Thank you!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2007
Well, just played a little bit with that new thing from Microsoft. Genius! Microsoft presented that step backwards as a step forward.
Say good bye to the 3-tier architecture, now any programmer, after 1 week training, will be able to put SELECT * into the source code. No more stored procedures and logic on a server. No more ugly WHERE clauses. Just SELECT * and pass all records in a loop :)
When I looked at the queries, generated by LINQ in SQL profiler, I noticed that they are generated automatically using the same pattern. It is obvious, of course, but now it would be really difficult to trace a problematic query back to the C# code. All updates to table X will look like as identical twins!
On the other side, it is not so bad. We will have soon a lot of projects, failing when they go to the production and face the real volumes of data. And a long queue of companies, crying and asking to save them. Perfect “job security�. Please, use LINQ! Port all your code to LINQ immediately (Laughing demonically like Dr. Evil)
Hm… a second thought, but what could we suggest to these companies, having performance problems with LINQ 3rd party applications, when there is no source code? Now we could at least modify some stored procedures, and with LINQ looks like the only recommendation could be “contact a developer of that application or buy more a powerful server�.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2008
Is it possible to use LINQ to SQL with Report Services? If so, are there any examples, tutorials, etc.?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
Is Linq a feature of sql server 2008 ?
Or is it a feature of DOt net. Visual Studio 2008 ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
Some say linq to sql leads to the death of stored procedures is it correct ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2006
Will Linq be compatible with Sql Server Everywhere without having to add additional plugins?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 30, 2007
Hullo am using Asp.Net 3.5, I want to create a usercontrol that is supported to all projects to upload file into sqlserver,
the user just give the database connection string,
tablename, column name depending upon their need, here I develop the
code using LINQ technology.
I Write a class with simple format like below,
using System;
using System.Data;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Security;
using System.Web.UI;
using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts;
using System.Xml.Linq;
using System.Data.Linq;
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for FILE_MASTER_INSERT
/// </summary>
//namespace Linq2Sql_demo_doc
//{
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Table(Name = "FILE_MASTER")]
public partial class FILE_MASTER
{
string Tablename;
public FILE_MASTER()
{
//
// TODO: Add constructor logic here
//
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name="filename")]
public string FileName
{
get;
set;
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name = "file_content")]
public byte[] file_content
{
get;
set;
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name = "file_id", IsPrimaryKey = true, IsDbGenerated = true, CanBeNull = false)]
public int file_id
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class TestDB : DataContext
{
public Table<FILE_MASTER> FILE_MASTERs;
//Initializing base class constructor
public TestDB(string s) : base(s) { }
}
This
is working but, this is suitable only for single table, I expect
depending upon the user input automaticaly the tablename, column name
will change in the yellow block codes .
Is there any way to update the tablename , columnname from any other class?
Thank you. Jeyaseelan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2008
I'm new to ASP/VS/Linq and I'm having a small problem.
I have one table setup in SQL Server Express 2005 through Visual Studio 2008. The table name is "Users" and has three columns (accountID, userName, email). AccountID is the primary key and set to auto incriment. I've added a couple of records by hand and it works.
I have a single form with a button, a label, and two text boxes. The button code is below. After entering some fake data that does not already exist in the database and clicking the button I get this.
Cannot insert explicit value for identity column in table 'Users' when IDENTITY_INSERT is set to OFF.
I understand that it is trying to insert something into the accountID field but I don't understand why since I'm only providing a username and e-mail address to insert.
Your help is greatly appreciated.protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MyDatabaseDataContext db = new MyDatabaseDataContext();
var query = from u in db.Users
where u.email == txtEmail.Text
select u;
var count = query.Count();
if (count == 0)
{
//Create a new user object.
User newUser = new User();
newUser.username = txtUsername.Text;
newUser.email = txtEmail.Text;
//Add the user to the User table.
db.Users.InsertOnSubmit(newUser);
db.SubmitChanges();
}
else
{
Label1.Text = txtEmail.Text + " already exists in the database.";
}
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2008
I have a supplier table with all my suppliers in it. I list them in a gridview. In this gridview, there is a link next to each record to an edit page. Below is the code for the edit page. Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim db As New orderLinqDataContext
Dim q = db.selectSupplierByID(Request.QueryString("id"))
Dim r As New System.Data.DataTable
txtFriend.Text = q(0).friendlyName
txtAdd1.Text = q(0).address1
txtAdd2.Text = q(0).address2
txtAdd3.Text = q(0).address3
txtAdd4.Text = q(0).address4
txtName.Text = q(0).supplierName
txtPhone.Text = q(0).phone
txtFax.Text = q(0).fax
txtPostCode.Text = q(0).postCode
End Sub
This causes a runtime error. The error is: "The query results cannot be enumerated more than once." and the txtAdd1.text line is highlighted.
How am I supposed to get at the data so I can fill my text boxes this way?
Thanks,
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2008
var query = from cloc in context.t_companylocs where (cloc.ref_company == companyid) && (cloc.street == attributes["Street"]) && (cloc.postalcode == attributes["Postalcode"]) && (cloc.country in countrylist) && (cloc.city in citylist) select cloc; attributes is a Dictionary<string, string> object.countrylist and citylist are List<string> objects.Of course the syntax above doesn't work. It's basically what I'm trying to achieve :-)A quick and dirty solution would be to just drop the two where constraints containing the "where in" statement and handle that part in the following foreach() loop.Can anyone please explain how you would do it properly?regards
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2008
Does anyone have a good example of how to insert data using System.Data.Linq? All the examples I've seen do something likeNorthwindDataContext db = new NorthwindDataContext();var x = new Product() {...}; db.Products.Add(x);db.SubmitChanges(); However I'm not seeing an Add method on System.Data.Linq.Table<T>. Has this changed? Could I somehow not be generating my model correctly?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2008
Hello,
How can I get autogenerated value of inserted item with linq to sql?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
I would like to use LINQ to generate a sql statement that does not use LIKE, but rather uses CONTAINS. Is this possible? If not, my second question is whether or not I can parameterize a SqlCommand that uses CONTAINS. For example the following statement works just fine when I pass in the parameter via SqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue()SELECT * FROM [event] WHERE CONTAINS(comments, @searchTerm1)However, the following results in a variable not defined error.SELECT * FROM [event] WHERE (comments LIKE @searchTerm1)Any ideas? Thanks for your help.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2008
Hi there,
In 2005.NET, if I used an asp:repeater, I would load the data from source and then manipulate it like so://load the data from source using a predefined connection and SQL Statement.private void LoadMyDataFromSource(){ try { connection.Open(); OleDbDataReader myReader = comm.ExecuteReader(); rptrCatList.DataSource = myReader; rptrCatList.DataBind(); myReader.Close(); } finally { connection.Close(); }} //catch the ItemDataBound event and manipulate the data how I wish before it's loaded into the Repeater.protected void rptrCatList_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e) { if (e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem) { int title = 4; //this is the index of the column I wish to manipulate((Label)e.Item.FindControl("lblTitle")).Text = ((IDataRecord)e.Item.DataItem).GetString(title) + ":" } }This would give me all the flexbility I ever needed. But now I wish to use linq and since the IDataRecord relies on dataReader sources, I cannot obtain the same flexbility. Can anyone point me in the right direction for obtaining the same kind of flexbility but using a linq-to-SQL dataContext? I wish to manipulate mostData that comes through from my source, so: //loadng the data in via my linq-to-sql context.private void LoadProducts() { MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext (); var all = from p in db.Products_IncontinenceStandards where p.Product_Cat == "Category1" select p; rpterCat.DataSource = all; rpterCat.DataBind(); }This is where I get stuck because, even though I can still capture the ItemDataBound event since I have databound the Repeater to the linqSource, I can't access the individual fields (or this is what I think I can't do!), Does anyone know how to relate to this so I can create the same effect? Many Thanks,Nathan Channon
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2008
Hi,
I am beginner in SQL Server So excuse me if my question is stange for you.
I have to work on an sql server 2005. I need to extract data from this server in XML file. I have look at a lots of thing and I find two solutions:
- Use SSIS
- Create a home made solution with LINQ in c#
Clearly I do not have enouth experience to see with solution are the most available? Which are the things required to use those solutions?
Thanks
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2007
Hi Guys,
I started working with linq and vb9.0 but i have a small problem i could feagure how to solve in c# but not in vb
I wanted to make left join or right join on vb 9.0 and linq is it possible or this is only c# feature ?
Waiting to hear from u guys,
Thanks
Softy
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 30, 2007
Hello, How do I add multiple data using LINQ, this one doesn't work. ... Protected Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Dim i As Integer For i = 0 To 3 Dim db As personalDataContext = New personalDataContext Dim p As personal = New personal p.name = "John" p.number = "01213" p.picture = "image/image.jpg" db.personals.InsertOnSubmit(p) Next End Sub... cheers,imperialx
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2008
I'm just starting to dabble around with LINQ and all of the examples I've come across all have 1 where clause. Is this intentional such that we are supposed to build queries on top of queries or is there a method in which I can add multiple predicates to my 1 query? I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question, I've been googling it to death and reading the few manuals on LINQ but like I said, all of the examples have had 1 where predicate.
Thanks,
Chance
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2008
hi, i'm working with LINQ to SQL and i have a table called Account, in that is Type, which is an int in the database but i map it to a AccountType enum, this works fine, but if i go into the dbml designer and change something later on, it gets errors, so i have to change all int->enum mappings back to int, recompile and then set them again! has anyone else had this? kindest regards
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
Here's my LINQ code:pl = (from p in db.Table where p.ID == 1 orderby p.NumericField descending select p).Take(7);
As you can see, I'm trying to sort by a numeric field. Specifically, it's a Numeric(5,0) field.
Problem is, the results aren't coming back numeric order. If this is good LINQ code, perhaps it's something else in my app. I just want to make sure this LINQ code is good.
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2008
Can I know the best method to connect the sql server 2008 with Visual studio 2008, it will be helpful if I know how to access the stored procedures in the sqlserver via LINQ.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2013
I am trying to convert the following sql to linq
SELECT R.UserID,R.Cntrl_nbr FROM User R
WHERE (
R.REG_ID=
(SELECT MAX(B.REG_ID)
FROM User B
WHERE R.UserID = B.UserID )
The linq I am using is
var query = (from n2 in q1
where
n2.RegServiceTs == (q1.Where(c1 => c1.UserID == n2.UserID).Max(c2 => c2.REG_ID))
select n2).SingleOrDefault();
This is slow and is there a better way to do this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2007
I'm trying convert my working CLR Trigger to a Linq-based implementation, but I don't seem to be able to get Linq to cooperate with the Trigger's context transaction (a local SubordinateTransaction with IsolationLevel="ReadCommitted").
For brevity's sake I've boiled down my scenario to a bare minimum: A SQL table [Test] with three columns (int Manual, int Automatic, IDENTITY int ID) needs any external updates on its [Manual] column to be applied to its [Automatic] column (with an additional sign change) through a Trigger.
A fairly direct translation of my non-Linq CLR Trigger to Linq yields the following code (the [Trigger_TestLinQs] SQL table has been modified to point to the Trigger's "INSERTED" table, [TestLinQs] points to the actual SQL table):
Code Snippet[SqlTrigger(Name = "LinQTrigger", Target = "dbo.TestLinQ", Event = "FOR INSERT, UPDATE")]
public static void LinQTrigger()
{
SqlTriggerContext triggerContext = SqlContext.TriggerContext;
if (triggerContext.TriggerAction == TriggerAction.Insert || triggerContext.TriggerAction == TriggerAction.Update) {
//using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(Transaction.Current)) { /* err 6549 */ using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection("context connection=true")) {
connection.Open();
using (MyDataContext context = new MyDataContext(connection)) {
List<int[]> updates = new List<int[]>();
foreach (Trigger_TestLinQ test in (from t in context.Trigger_TestLinQs select t)) { /* err 6522 */
if (test.Manual != null && triggerContext.IsUpdatedColumn(0))
updates.Add(new int[] { test.ID, -test.Manual.Value });
}
foreach (int[] update in updates) {
dbo.TestLinQ test = (from t in context.TestLinQs where t.ID == update[0] select t).Single<dbo.TestLinQ>();
test.Automatic = update[1];
}
context.SubmitChanges();
}
}
// scope.Complete(); //}
}
}
Running this on SQL Server 2005 / .NET 3.5 beta2 produces an Error 6522 "Cannot enlist in the transaction because a local transaction is in progress on the connection." in the line executing the Linq query because the Linq DataContext apparently insists on opening a transaction.
The recommended pattern for DataContext query operations - running them inside a TransactionScope as indicated by the commented-out sections - unfortunately leads to a different Error 6549 in the TransactionScope constructor complaining about a missing MSDTC. And there shouldn't be a need for a distributed transaction here, should there?
Using different TransactionScope constructors (TransactionScopeOptions.Required, TransactionOptions(){IsolationLevel=ReadCommitted}) did not make any difference, either.
What am I doing wrong here? Is there any way for the Linq DataContext to attach to the CLR Trigger's ambient transaction?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
We have an application that is built with WPF/.net 3.5 and leverages LINQ to SQL. Everything runs as expected when our application connects to MS SQL Server 2005. We have made a SQL CE version of our database using the Microsoft SYNC framework, and SQLMetal.exe to generate our .dbml.
The issue we are running into is that our application hangs while our LINQ to SQL objects are delay loading an EntitySet at random places throughout our code. After futher looking into the issue, and testing our published application on various workstations, we have discovered that the application does work on one computer that has SQL CE version 3.05.5365.0000. It does not however work on any computers that have SQL CE version 3.05.5386.0000.
We are logging the SQL queries that the LINQ to SQL is generating and when we execute them in the the Visual Studio 2008 Query Analyzer, they run successfully.
Any ideas are appreciated as we have hit a dead end.
Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2007
I have a GridView that is populated by a stored procedure via linq. I changed the stored procedure to return an additional column, but I can't get the additional column to show up in the GridView. The GridView has autogeneratecolumns=true, so if I were using a SqlDataSource the new column would show up automagically. But now it is not showing up and I cannot reference it. I can't figure out how to make linq recognize that my stored procedure has changed. I have tried deleting the sproc definition from the dbml file, making sure the partial class is removed the .vb file, refreshing the stored procedures list in database explorer, and adding the sproc definition back again (a hassle), but still it insists on defining only the original columns and not the new column. How do get linq to get back in sync with the database?
View 1 Replies
View Related
