I'm trying to find information and/or articles on what exactly "Do not replicate DELETE statements" does in transactional replication. How does this affect the Publisher, Distributor, and Subscriber? Does information deleted on the publisher not replicate to the subscriber? What scenarios would someone use this option on a article?
Sorry noob to replication and SQL 2005....
I previously asked What does "Do not replicate DELETE statements" do? to make sure I was correct on my thinking of what "Do not replicate DELETE statements" does. And after finding out it does what I would like it to do, create an archive db, I've tried several testing scenarios to see if it would work. So far I have been unable to not replicate delete statements. I'm not sure if I'm not setting a property right or what and any guidance would be appreciated.
Here is what I've done.
Created a blank db to be used as a subscriber and created a test db with some random data in a table.
Setup a New Publication on the db with the random data as "Transactional Publication"
Selected the following articles and properties in the publication
Tables
DELETE Delivery Format = Do not replicate DELETE statements
Views
Default Values
Stored Procedures
Default Values
User Functions
Default Values
Selected the default options for the rest of the New Publication Wizard steps and clicked finish.
Created a Pull Subscription on the new publication that I just created.
Let it initialize.
Then did a select count(*) query on the test table on the publication (18k+ rows) and subscriber (18k+ rows)
Then did a delete t-sql from the test table on the publication.
Then did a select count(*) query on the test table on the publication (0 rows) and subscriber (0 rows).
Now shouldn't it not delete the records on the subscription db?
I am testing SQL Server 2005.
I need a replication where "DELETE delivery format" field in Table Articles Properties is set to "Do not replicate DELETE statement". Unfortunately nothing I set in this dialog is saved and used. Doesn matter what I change the replication behaves the same and the next time I open "Table Articles Properties", every value is still default.
Am I doing something wrong or is it an issue (bug) in 2005 replication?
I googled about the issue and also searched in the SQL Server Replication threads on this site, both with no success. The thread named "Selective replication of DELETE transactions" doesn't provide enough information about SWL Server 2005 replication configuration.
Use Case:
I have a small "operational" database with live data. I need to keep a complete history for all records that ever appeared within the "operational" DB. It came to my mind that I can "easily" achieve this if I set up a replication that does not replicate a delete statement ever. I strongly prefer not to mess with the subscription stored procedures but to configer my publication properly instead.
I would like to run more than 100 delete statements from a database.
is it possible to use all delete statements in one single stored procedure.
Thanks.
I have a database that I am splitting the data using odd account numbers and even account numbers. The odd acct numbers in one database and the even in the other database.
This database is very large. The problem is when I run the delete statements
it is going to fill up the log files. Can I turn on the "Simple" mode on the database while I am deleteing the data. Will this cause a problem? Then can I turn back on the 'Full' mode when I have finished?
Has anyone ever done this and so how did it work. Or better yet is it possible?
Thanks,
Dianne
Hi
I was curious whether it's possible to audit DELETE statements in the MS SQL database. I created a procedure (below), but I didn't find any event associated with DELETE statements.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Alla
CREATE proc sp_Turn_Audit_On
as
/************************************************** **/
/* Created by: SQL Profiler */
/* Date: 11/15/2006 05:16:40 PM */
/************************************************** **/
-- Create a Queue
declare @rc int
declare @TraceID int
declare @maxfilesize bigint
declare @StatusMsg varchar
declare @ServerTraceFile varchar
set @ServerTraceFile = 'E:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLTraceAudit_Info'
set @maxfilesize = 1024
-- Client side File and Table cannot be scripted
-- Set the events
declare @on bit
set @on = 1
exec @rc = sp_trace_create @TraceID OUTPUT, 0, N'\hostnamedbauditlogmy_dir', @maxfilesize, NULL
print @TraceID
if (@rc != 0) goto error
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 1, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 6, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 9, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 10, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 11, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 12, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 13, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 14, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 16, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 17, @on
exec sp_trace_setevent @TraceID, 14, 18, @on
-- Set the Filters
declare @intfilter int
declare @bigintfilter bigint
exec sp_trace_setfilter @TraceID, 10, 0, 7, N'SQL Profiler'
-- Set the trace status to start
exec sp_trace_setstatus @TraceID, 1
--SELECT @StatusMsg = 'sp_trace_setstatus' + ' Error - ' + @TraceID
-- display trace id for future references
select TraceID=@TraceID
goto noCursor
error:
select ErrorCode=@rc
noCursor:
return
GO
exec sp_procoption N'sp_Turn_Audit_On', N'startup', N'true'
GO
Hi, I am using sql2000 ent edition. I have a partitioned view based on 8 tables. My selects and inserts are fine. But, when I run a delete on the view based on a query on the paritioned column, I get a "Transaction (Process ID 149) was deadlocked and has been chosen as a victim".
I looked at the query plan and it was showing a parallel query on all the underlying tables. So, I put the Option(maxdop 1), using only one processor and the delete worked fine.
Does anybody know why? is parallel query create deadlocks? is there any known problems with deletes on partitioned views?
same question for updates. I think I have the same problem for updates.
Any help will be useful.
thanks!!
In SQL Server 2000/2005 (not CE) I can use the following T-SQL statement to delete orphaned rows from a table:
DELETE GroupsMembers FROM GroupsMembers LEFT OUTER JOIN Groups ON GroupsMembers.GroupID = Groups.ID WHERE Groups.ID IS NULL
SQL Server CE does not seem to support combining the JOIN statement with the DELETE statement. Is this correct? If yes, is there any alternative statement that could be used to accomplish the same thing?
Gerrit
Hi, I just want you to know that I am very young in ASP.NET world so please bear with me.I have been looking for an answer to my problem, but unfortunately I couldn’t find one. So I created a user here on www.asp.net just for making this post.
Before I continue I just want to apologies if there is another post where this question is already answered.
Please watch this Print Screen I just took: � http://www.bewarmaronsi.com/Capture.JPG “
As you can see the “INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE Statements� are disabled, and that’s exactly my problem. I tried with an MS access database and it works perfect, but when I use a MS SQL database this field gets disabled for some reason.
The MDF file is located in the App_data folder and is called ASPNETDB.
And when I try to add custom SQL statements, it gives me Syntax error near “=�. Something like that. I bought the Total Training Set1 package and it works perfect in their examples.
I just want to thank you for reading my post and I hope that you got some useful information for me.
By the way, I’, from Sweden so you have to excuse me if my English is rusty.
Thanks!
PS: Can it be that I’m running windows Vista?
I have problem in using the SQLDataSource. When in VS 2005 I drag and drop the SQLDataSource onto my page and then add a GridView control.I bind the GridView control to the SQLDataSource control. But the problem is it does not generate the INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements. The dialog box is inactive. The screenshots may help. please help me in this regard. I also tried it for Accesscontrol but the same problem. Sorry for my poor English!. thanks in advance
the screenshot links:
http://img139.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=28285_2_122_937lo.JPGhttp://img205.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27550_1_122_203lo.JPG
Auditors want us to track when Insert, Update and Delete failures occur. Is this possible in SQL 2000?
They also want us to track schema changes. Is this possible?
Thanks, Dave
We are not allowed to write delete statement in a function. It will give the below error.
"Invalid use of a side-effecting operator 'DELETE' within a function."
We will get the same error for truncate/drop statements.
What is the reason behind this error?
I am working on an app that getting quite a few deadlocks due to delete statements. Â I have turned on the sql trace flags and pulled the offending delete statements out of the ERRORLOG and trying to mesh those up with the indexes defined on the table, etc. looking to see if there is anything that can be done strictly from the db side (no app code change) to reduce/eliminate these deadlocks. Â I have ran some tests/played around with RCSI and even disabling lock escalation but neither have improved my results.
What I have done is to search the errorlog file for DELETE FROM Tablename, output those matching lines, then sort of normalize the literal values to # or XYZ, open in Notepad++, removed trailing whitespace + dups and sort to come up with these results for the unique list of offending T-SQL statements (a LOT easier to read in text editor so sending screen cap. Â
Open this url in new tab [URL] ....
Hi,I'm new to ASP.NET and having a problem configuring the SqlDataSource control. I am using the standard ASP.NET 2.0 "aspnetdb" database to manage user accounts. The problem is this:When using the wizard to configure my SqlDataSource control, the option to auto-generate the Insert/Update/Delete SQL statements are grayed out. I've searched this forum and found that this can be a symptom of no primary keys in the tables. However, there are primary keys (UserId), which is the default schema as generated by asp.net (aspnet_regsql.exe). When I use the wizard, I make the following choices:How would you like to retrieve data from your database?-> Select "Specify columns from a table or view"-> Select the "vw_aspnet_MembershipUsers" view from the "Name:" drop-down list-> Select "UserId", "Email", "UserName" from "Columns:"After this, still no option to auto-generate I/U/D statements. Any thoughts on why this isn't working??? Thanks,Leah.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are using MS SQL Server 2008. I am running a batch job which deletes 21 days older records(6-7 million records). But daily we have transaction is going on in the database. When the delete occurs, all the insert statements got blocked and waits till the delete statement to complete. May I know why the blocking occurs?Â
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an SQL data source on my page and I select "Table". On the next screen I pick the fields I want to show. Then I click the "Advanced" button because I want to allow Inserts, updates and deletes. But its all greyed out abd I can't check this option. The UID in the connection string I am connecting under has the correct permissions in SQL server to do inserts, update and deletes too. Anyone know why it would be greyed out? The connectionstring property in the aspx code is dynamic but this shouldn't be the reason because I have used this before with success
View 2 Replies View RelatedUsing SQL 7.0 I'd like to replicate just schema from DB on server A to DB on server B, then be able to replicate data only form DB on server B to DB on server A. I need help!!
Thanks for ANY information you can give me...
~Jepadria
I am new (very new) to SQL. I 'm trying to set up SQL 7 to replicate a particular table on a daily schedule and then FTP the file out to a remote directory. Sounds easy! I'm sure it is, I just need someone to walk me through the steps.
If anyone can help me out I would really appreciate it.
Hi my friends,
I'm replicating with SQL Server 2000(updated Service Pack 3) get error:
SQL Server Enterprise Manager could not configure 'BREEZE1' as the Distributor for 'BREEZE1'.
Error 14113: Could not execute "'"C:program filesmicrosoft sql server80 ools\binnosql" -E -l60 -t60 -d"distribution" -b -i"c:MSDESQLBinnMSSQL\installinstdist.sql" -o"c:msdesqlinnmssql\installinstdist.out"'". Check 'instdist.out' in the install directory.
'distribution' is not configured as a distribution database.
Deleting database file 'c:msdesqldatamssqldatadistribution.ldf'.
Deleting database file 'c:msdesqldatamssqldatadistribution.mdf'.
I have a feeling this is failing because I have not C:msdesqlinnmssqlinstall directory at all.
Is there something I'm doing wrong...If the SP3 can affect???
This code :
declare @filenumber as char
set @filenumber = '65'
declare @filenu2 as char(6)
set @filenu2 = CONVERT(CHAR(6),(replicate('0',(6-len(@filenumber)))+ @filenumber ))
select @filenu2 as x
This should return 000065
but it returns 000006
i have stepped through it the replicate should replicate the 0 4 times
(6 - len of @filenumber) instaed its doing it 5 ??
Merge replication. We switched a publication over from push to pull and are now initiating everything within an application. We have just encountered a situation where it is now completely impossible to replicate DDL.
When this was a push subscription, we could execute the following and it would fly straight through the engine and hit every subscriber without having to do anything at all:
ALTER TABLE <tablename>
ADD <columnname> <datatype> NULL
Now that it is a pull subscription when I issue an ALTER TABLE and add a nullable column to the end of the table, it does NOT replicate at ALL. We get the following error message:
The schema definition of the destination table 'dbo'.'Player' in the subscription database does not match the schema definition of the source table in the publication database. Reinitialize the subscription without a snapshot after ensuring that the schema definition of the destination table is the same as the source table. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199478)
Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147199478
The process was successfully stopped. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199481)
Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147199481
It apears that we are now required to either reinitialize every subscriber every time we add a column or we are required to first distribute the DDL change to each subscriber, make sure they all have it, then add it to the publisher before anyone replicates, and then reinit every single one of them without a snapshot. This makes absolutely no sense at all.
The interesting thing is that we can add articles at will and those get applied with absolutely no problems at all to the subscribers without having to do anything other than add the article and generate a new snapshot.
Version 9.00.3042.00
Hi everyone, I've recently been thrown into a DBA role (I've never done any DBA work except writing a few SQL queries), so please go easy on me if these are stupid questions. My first task is to find the best way to replicate data between two SQL Server production databases. The data is to come from Production DB #1 to Production DB #2 (for access by a different system). The data has to be super-close -- not necessarily real-time, but within a few minutes. So when data is updated in #1, #2 shouldn't be be lagged by more than 45 minutes (5-10 is ideal). There are hundreds of thousands of records.What would be the best way to do this? Are there options in SQL Server 2005 to do "differential" updates from DB1 to DB2? Or is that how "transactional replication" works? If we were to implement a "full recovery model", will this impact any sort of replication? Thanks.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWE have a production database that we need to sync with about 100
salesman's laptops. These laptops will not always be online and
would need to sync on the fly.
We are thinking of having a separate distribution database to handle
the load and creating either a pull subscription or even just a DTS
package. We would like to have the salesmen just signon and go to an
ASP page and hit an Icon and either the pull subscription or the dts
package would start the sync..
Anyone tried this before and have any other ideas??
Thanks for any help??
SB
I have set up a simple trans rep from a server in the office to the web. both servers are NT4sp6aSQL 7.0. Tables only.
The publication and distribution db are on the server at the office, and there is a full time connection through the firewall.
The initialization and first replication works perfectly, but after that, there is a message from the snapshot agent that "no subscriptions needed initialization", the logreader says thare are no replicated transactions and the Distribution agent says there are no replicated transactions. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance
Hi, there
I have a situation here....
I have Production DB and Development DB in the same SQL7.0 box....
I want to update the data and SP from Pro. to Dev at least once a day...
So this is my plan.
1. Back up(Pro.) and restore(Dev.) so I can have the same DB in the same box.
2. Using a Replication (Pulication and Subscription) ro update the data and SP.
3. Because DTS can not update the SP, I use the replication instead of DTS.
I need to update the SP, too..(Front end is ACCESS and backend is SQL7.0 DB)
Is there any other methods or way to make ti happen... Any suggestion can help...
Thanks in advance
Jay
Can you have a database setup for both replication to server A and log shipping to server B?
Thanks,
Ken Nicholson
Hi,
I'm new to replication.
I configured Server named TESTER as publisher & distributer. Create new publication for database named TEST ( type : Transactional ), then Create a new push subcriptions for database TESTREPLICATION ( on the same Server : TESTER). Then I open a table in database TEST to input some data but I couldn't see any tables or data in database TESTREPLICATION ( I chose Continuously, not scheduled).
Yet, after the lunch, I could see the tables, no data. I tried to choose Start Synchronizing but not helped.
Please tell me if I configured incorrectly ?
Thanks,
Could someone please point me in the direction on where to look for info on how to:
Replicate an MS SQL 6.5 tables on an Oracle 10.2.0 server every 5-10min?
Hi:
In the publishing server, admin users could change and non-admin user password and also add login and drop login.
How could it happen to not only replicate the application database to subscriber server but also replicate the changes made in master database?
So that the remote subscriber server will have the most current login updates?
thanks
D
Hi,
When I'm using MS SQL transactional replication and select all the tables to be replicated, some of the tables are marked with the red cross signs and aren't being replicated. How do I include these tables into the MS SQL replication? I tried to build indexes and re-created publications, but it didn't work.
Please help!
Thanks in advance,
-Alla
Is any tool is available for replicating the Microsoft sql database..
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi all, I have done the replication its working good.Now i have created the new table in publisher. but i have created the same table in sub scription too. how can i replcate this new table..?
Thanks
Krishna
Can changes made to replicated stored procedures (and User-defined Functions) on the Publisher update the Subscriber database?
If I ALTER a SP (or UDF) on Database1 with peer-to-peer Transaction Replication to Database2, will the alter replicate to the Subscriber(s)?
Thomas
ThomBeaux