I have a table that contains two foreign keys of two different tables. I want to build a relationship so that when either primary keys deleted in the two tables, the record in the table should be deleted. But, SQL Server does not allow me to save the relationship, it complains that the circling delete might exist. I do not know why, how can I solve this?
Table A: ID ProductID <foreign key> CustomerID <foreign key>
Table Product ProductID <primary key>
Table Customer CustomerID <primary key>
I want to cascade delete the record in Table A when either the ProductID is deleted from Product table or the CustomerID is deleted from Customer table.
I'm going through my tables and rewriting them so that I can create relationship-based constraints and create foreign keys among my tables. I didn't have a problem with a few of the tables but I seem to have come across a slightly confusing hiccup.
Here's the query for my Classes table:
Code:
CREATE TABLE Classes ( class_id INT IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
This statement runs without problems and I Create the relationship with my Users table just fine, having renamed it to teacher_id. I have a 1:n relationship between users and tables AND an n:m relationship because a user can be a student or a teacher, the difference is one field, user_type, which denotes what type of user a person is. In any case, the relationship that's 1:n from users to classes is that of the teacher instructing the class. The problem exists when I run my query for the intermediary table between the class and the gradebook:
Code:
CREATE TABLE Classes_have_Grades ( class_id INT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
Query Analyzer spits out: Quote: Originally Posted by Query Analyzer There are no primary or candidate keys in the referenced table 'Classes' that match the referencing column list in the foreign key 'Classes_have_gradesFKIndex2'. Now, I know in SQL Server 2000 you can only have one primary key. Does that mean I can have a multi-columned Primary key (which is in fact what I would like) or does that mean that just one field can be a primary key and that a table can have only the one primary key?
In addition, what is a "candidate" key? Will making the other fields "Candidate" keys solve my problem?
I am brand new to SQL Server 2000 and have encountered an issue. I created a DB with 5 or so tables all of which contain different client information. All tables are related via the Client_ID primary key I set in my main table, and foreign key in all the subsequent tables. Im using a Microsoft Access Project form as the front end.
Im having trouble figuring out how to populate the subsequent tables with the Client_ID after a enter the data in the Main table where the primary key resides.
Do I create a trigger or a stored procedure...am i even in the ballpark?
I am in the process of building a fact table in a staging area. The data in the host system has numerous composite keys, so I have replaced all the composite keys in the dimensions with surrogate keys (integer) which are generated using an identity at load time. When I load the staging (fact) table, I have set the default value of all the foreign keys to 0. What I must do now is update all the foreign key values with the surrogate key values from the dimensions. I'm using an update command and the original gid values from the source system in the where clause...i.e. UPDATE X SET x.key_1 = y.key_1 FROM TableA X WITH (NOLOCK) INNER JOIN TableB Y WITH (NOLOCK) ON x.org_id = y.org_id AND x.bus_id = y.bus_id AND x.prov_gid = y.prov_gid AND x.log_gid = y.loc_gid;
This seems to work fine for most tables. However, I am now trying to update a table that has over 10 million rows and approximately 30 foreign keys. The script runs for hours. I ususally stop it after about 8 hours when it still hasn't completed. Since the keys are dynamic and they could possibly change during each load process, I can't add them during the load process.
Is there a better way to update these keys. I need to regenerate the fact tables every night and taking this much time to reload a fact table is just not practicle. I've indexed the alternate keys on all the dimensions and have also indexed the gids on the target fact table. Am I doing something wrong? Have I over indexed the target table? Please help! Thanks Jerry
I have contract table which has built in foreign key constrains. How can I alter this table for delete/ update cascade without recreating the table so whenever studentId/ contactId is modified, the change is effected to the contract table.
Thanks
************************************************** ****** Contract table DDL is
create table contract( contractNum int identity(1,1) primary key, contractDate smalldatetime not null, tuition money not null, studentId char(4) not null foreign key references student (studentId), contactId int not null foreign key references contact (contactId) );
I have 4 colums in a table Project, Sections,Tasks,Subtasks Each subtask will haven a row.
I need to write a trigger when I delete a task it needs to delete all the subtasks relating to it. When I delete a section it needs to delete all the tasks and subasks relating to it. similarly for project. This trigger for task-subtask works. CREATE TRIGGER "[Deletetasktrigger]" ON [Tbl] FOR DELETE AS SET NOCOUNT ON /* * CASCADE DELETES TO '[Tbl B]' */ DELETE [tbl] FROM deleted, [Tbl] WHERE deleted.[task] = [Tbl].[task] THis works fine. But when I do it for sections I get this error.
I am very new to SQL Server 2005. I have created a package to load data from a flat delimited file to a database table. The initial load has worked. However, in the future, I will have flat files used to update the table. Some of the records will need to be inserted and some will need to update existing rows. I am trying to do this from SSIS. However, I am very lost as to how to do this.
hello, once upon a time when i created my db (originally in access then used the conversion tool, which i now know is wrong!) i thought it would be an amazing idea to have cascading updates and deletes, however it turns out now this is exactly not what i want! if i leave them in then it throws errors when i delete records out of my stock table as related records are in the order_line table here is the code (well i think so, im not the best at sqlserver as you probably can tell already) that im using if anyone can help or point me in the right direction that would be great, thanks USE [nashdfDB1]GO/****** Object: Table [dbo].[tbl_stock] Script Date: 07/13/2007 02:52:14 ******/SET ANSI_NULLS ONGOSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONGOSET ANSI_PADDING ONGOCREATE TABLE [dbo].[tbl_stock]( [Stock_ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [cat_id] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__cat_i__15502E78] DEFAULT ((0)), [sub_cat_id] [int] NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__sub_c__164452B1] DEFAULT ((0)), [location] [int] NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__locat__173876EA] DEFAULT ((0)), [n_or_sh] [varchar](50) NULL, [title] [varchar](255) NULL, [description] [varchar](255) NULL, [size] [varchar](50) NULL, [colour] [varchar](50) NULL, [cost_price] [decimal](9, 2) NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__cost___182C9B23] DEFAULT ((0)), [selling_price] [decimal](9, 2) NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__selli__1920BF5C] DEFAULT ((0)), [qty] [varchar](50) NULL, [date] [datetime] NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__date__1A14E395] DEFAULT (getdate()), [condition] [varchar](255) NULL, [notes] [varchar](255) NULL, [visible] [bit] NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__tbl_stock__visib__1B0907CE] DEFAULT ((1)), [picture1] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture1_thumb] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture2] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture2_thumb] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture3] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture3_thumb] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture4] [varchar](50) NULL, [picture4_thumb] [varchar](50) NULL, [display_price] [varchar](50) NULL, [created_by] [varchar](50) NULL, [buying_in_recipt] [varchar](255) NULL, CONSTRAINT [tbl_stock$PrimaryKey] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [Stock_ID] ASC)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]) ON [PRIMARY] GO SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
I have three tables: BulkMemberHeader - which has a cascade delete on BulkMemberDetail of any related records BulkMemberDetail €“ which has a DELETE trigger which gets the member ID from deleted and deletes the member record from the member table Member
This issue: > When I delete a record from BulkMemberDetail the trigger fires and deletes the record from the Member table as it should > If I delete a record from the BulkMemberHeader, all corresponding records in BulkMemberDetail are deleted, but the trigger to delete the record in the Member table does not seem to fire
Is it a limitation on SQLServer 2000 that does not allow triggers to fire in a scenario like this?
I'm looking for a query I can use to alter table relationships. What I want to do in particular, is to set every relationship to cascade on update. Can anyone point me out to a solution? MSDN seems very vague in this subject.
ALTER TABLE [Students] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_Schools] FOREIGN KEY([SchoolId]) REFERENCES [Schools] ([SchoolId])
What kind of index would ensure best performance for INSERTs/UPDATEs, so that SQL Server can most efficiently check the FK constraints? Would it be simply:
CREATE INDEX IX_Students_SchlId ON Students (SchoolId) Or CREATE INDEX IX_Students_SchlId ON Students (SchoolId, StudentId)
In other words, what's best practice for adding an index which best supports a Foreign Key constraint?
Background: Am working on completing an ORM that can not only handles CRUD actions -- but that can also updates the structure of a table transparently when the class defs change. Reason for this is that I can't get the SQL scripts that would work for updating a software on SqlServer to be portable to other DBMS systems. Doing it by code, rather than SQL batch has a chance of making cross-platform, updateable, software...
Anyway, because it needs to be cross-DBMS capable, the constraints are that the system used must work for the lowest common denominator....ie, a 'recipe' of steps that will work on all DBMS's.
The Problem: There might be simpler ways to do this with SqlServer (all ears :-) - just in case I can't make it cross platform right now) but, with simplistic DBMS's (SqlLite, etc) there is no way to ALTER table once formed: one has to COPY the Table to a new TMP name, adding a Column in the process, then delete the original, then rename the TMP to the original name.
This appears possible in SqlServer too --...as long as there are no CASCADE operations. Truncate table doesn't seem to be the solution, nor drop, as they all seem to trigger a Cascade delete in the Foreign Table.
So -- please correct me if I am wrong here -- it appears that the operations would be along the lines of: a) Remove the Foreign Key references b) Copy the table structure, and make a new temp table, adding the column c) Copy the data over d) Add the FK relations, that used to be in the first table, to the new table e) Delete the original f) Done?
The questions are: a) How does one alter a table to REMOVE the Foreign Key References part, if it has no 'name'. b) Anyone know of a good clean way to get, and save these constraints to reapply them to the new table. Hopefully with some cross platform ADO.NET solution? GetSchema etc appears to me to be very dbms dependant? c) ANY and all tips on things I might run into later that I have not mentioned, are also greatly appreciated.
Pls let me know How I generate script for All primary keys and foreign keys in a table. Thereafter that can be used to add primary keys and foreign keys in another databse with same structure.
Also how I script default and other constraints of a table?
There is itemlookup table, which stores item number and itemdescription. Also there is a child table, pricehistory, of theitemlookup table, which stores different prices and different dateranges. So it is one-to-many relationship. (Price can be stored morethan one with a different date range)And there is another table RequestItem that stores the foreign key ofthe itemlookup table to show the information of the itemlookup table.Then how do I know later which date range of the price was stored inthe RequestItem table? Since I only keep the foreign key of theitemlookup table, it will be impossible to keep track of the row of thepricehistory table if there are more than one data existed in thepricehistory table.Will it be a valid table structure to create a column for the foreignkey of the pricehistory in RequestItem table or any other ways tohandle this issue?
Hello all,I got a chance to peak into a database system. Part of its design israther unfamiliar to me. When I look at the diagram generated by SQLServer, there are many floating tables. Eventually it turns out thatthese many floating tables are actually not floating. Their tablenames relate to fields (as TableID) in other tables. In this case,you can get a handle to one of such tables by search TableID columnsin other tables.To be more specific, the database is a microarray database implementedin SQL Server 2000. They have a table called MICROARRAYS. In thistable, there is a column called table_id. These table_ids are in facttable names of a bunch of other tables.My questions are1) Is this good relational design?2) How well is this kind of design supported in SQL Server?3) Are there better alternatives?Any other comment or link to helpful resources will also beappreciated.Thanks,Eric Wu
I have two tables as below. I want to update a quote and change the item for which it is for. So I want to do an update statement to change the cat_ref that the quote is for. However, when I do this I get a foreign key conflict with cat_ref in the item table. How do I get around this? Thanks
I have a table fields Register_date, Std_ID, course, version, CourseLearningDays, Batch_Time and Trainer_IDHOw to make Register_date and Batch_Time as primary key in the table.. What are the necessary datatype for these two fields.And one more do we have datatype called date and time in MS SQL Server...
I load values from a TXT file into the temporary table. From there, I figure out which records are new and need to be added to the primary table, and which records are duplicates, and need to a) update the primary table and b) be deleted from the temporary table.Basically, I need to write a SQL statement to grab the records that exist in BOTH tables based upon two primary criteria:
d_id in temporary table = d_id in primary table df_t_v_stock_number in temporary table = v_stock_number in primary table
There are several fields that must be updated if the d_id and v_stock_number match:
I have a very elementary question on table design. This screenshot (which is part of a larger diagram) sets the context of the question.
There are two distinct groups of products with different attributes, hence two separate tables: Products_A and Products_B. There's a third table that keeps track of daily production (DailyProduction), which must accept items from either product table. Now, my question is: How do I relate these two tables to "DailyProduction" ? If I place a double-constraint with two foreign keys, then I get an error whenever I attempt to insert a record in DailyProduction. For example, if the new item is of "Products_A" type, then the error message from SSMS is:
No row was updated.
The data in row 1 was not committed. Error Source: .Net SqlClient Data Provider. Error Message: The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_DailyProduction_Products_B". The conflict occurred in database "MyDatabase", table "dbo.Products_B", column 'ProductB_ID'. The statement has been terminated.
Correct the errors and retry or press ESC to cancel the change(s).
It's clear that the error message makes sense as SQL is trying to apply BOTH constraints. It's one AND the other, not one OR the other. Now, how do I remedy this ? What would be the most appropriate way to relate the three tables ?
Hello!I have a table A with fields id,startdate and other fields. id and startdateare in the primary key.In the table B I want to introduce a Foreign key to field id of table A.Is this possible? If yes, which kind of key I have to build in table A?Thx in advance,Fritz
i'm using sql express, management studio express and a visual web developer starter kit. i have 4 tables: items; categories; categorization; old_items the old_items table has both the item id and category fields in it, the new db has them separated: items.id; categories.id; categorization.itemId, categorizaton.parentCategoryId, both of which are foreign keys. i need to get the old_item.id and old_item.category values into the new categorization table but it keeps choking on the foreign keys and i can't get past it. as far as i've been able to figure out so far, i need to turn off the foreign keys to do the insert but i'm not sure and i haven't been able to find any sql query examples that demonstrate it or explain it well enough for my n00b self. i've read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/10cetyt6.aspx, "How to: Disable Foreign Key Constraints with INSERT and UPDATE Statements" but i don't get how that affects it, it seems like one of the other options would actually disable them. can anyone help? i've been trying all the permutations of queries i can think of and not getting it. thanks.
We have a SQL Server 6.5 table, with composite Primary Key, having the Duplicate Entry for the Key. I wonder how it got entered there? Now when we are trying to import this table to SQL2K, it's failing with Duplicate row error. Any Help?
I have a problem with multiple databases on a server. I originally read another post that went into detail on this same error. After reading the post I decided to re-index the table to see if that would fix my issue. I started on Saturday by re-indexing a table on database 'a' - the process completed after that; I received another error on database 'b' on Monday i subsequently re-indexed all indexes on this database; today I have received the same message on database 'c' and 'd'. All post that I have read seem to point to an issue with only one database and not multiple databases. I have approximately 100 databases on this cluster - SQL 2000. The physical server logs only error shown is '000009ac.00001744::2007/12/29-15:12:58.848 ERR [CP] CppReadCheckpoint unable to copy file U:Disk12Partition1d61e68e-a60f-4ca6-b9ae-df3b893e4bb2 0000001.CPT to C:DOCUME~1mscsLOCALS~1TempCLS302F.tmp, error 3 000009ac.00001744::2007/12/29-15:12:58.848 ERR [CP] CppReadCheckpoint - Was that due to quorum resource not being up ??? ' before corruption of database 'a'.
Here is the entire error if you think it will help. The error has been the same on all databases: 12/28/2007 6:23 AM A possible database consistency problem has been detected on database ‘ substituted_name'. DBCC CHECKDB and DBCC CHECKCATALOG should be run on database 'substituted_name'..
When I run the DBCC CHECKDB command I got these errors on Substite name database: DBCC results for 'FVD_A'. Msg 2511, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 165575628, Index ID 2. Keys out of order on page (1:12743984), slots 97 and 98. There are 72920059 rows in 2281375 pages for object 'FVD_A'. CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in table 'FVD_A' (object ID 165575628). DBCC results for 'FVD_CVS322'. Msg 2511, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 181575685, Index ID 2. Keys out of order on page (1:7250519), slots 30 and 31.
I am at a loss. I believe we may have a bigger issue, but the SAN Administrator and Server Admin are saying there is nothing they can do. Do I have a true SQL Server issue or something else.
Hey,I am having some confusion about how to formulate this particularquery.I have 2 tables. Table A has 4 columns say a1,a2,a3,a4 with thecolumns a1,a2,a4 forming the primary key. Table B again has 3 columnswith b1,b2,b3,b4 and like before, b1,b2 and b4 form the primary key.All columns are of the same datatype in both tables. Now I want to getrows from table A which are not present in table B. Whats the best wayof doing this?Thanks--Posted using the http://www.dbforumz.com interface, at author's requestArticles individually checked for conformance to usenet standardsTopic URL: http://www.dbforumz.com/General-Dis...pict235166.htmlVisit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.dbforumz.com/eform.php?p=815725
Kinda new to SQL, using SQL Server 2005.I have some foreign keys in a couple of tables. I need to drop thesetables, but can't since I'll get the error:Msg 3726,Level 16, State 1, Line 1Could not drop object 'Client' because it is referenced by a FOREIGNKEY constraint.I'm not sure how to disable or get rid of these foreign keys so that Ican drop my tables. I tried:ALTER TABLE Client NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALLAlter Table Client Drop Column Foreign Key Boss_ID;I went into the Object Explorer and deleted the FK lines from eachtable, but still the same error.What am I doing wrong?Thanks for your help.
I want to partition this table on 5 different coulumns.
year, month. coulumn3, coulumn4 and coulumn5.
How do I do this best?
What is the best way of doing this; is there any best practice on ths?
The obvious thing is to make a partition funktion based on the year and month coulmns, but I also want to partition on coulumn3, coulumn4 and coulumn5.
From last 1 week or so, i have been facing very strange problem with my sql server 2005s database which is configured and set on the hosting web server. Right now for managing my sql server 2005 database, i am using an web based Control Panel developed by my hosting company.
Problem i am facing is that, whenever i try to modify (i.e. add new columns) tables in the database, it gives me error saying that,
"There is already an object named 'PK_xxx_Temp' in the database. Could not create constraint. See previous errors. Source: .Net SqlClient Data Provider".
where xxx is the table name.
I have done quite a bit research on the problem and have also searched on the net for solution but still the problem persist.