hi,
Can any one tell me which is better suitable for web applicaiton Stored Procedure or transaction for regural process in the table..
can you explain me why..?
I have a stored procedure 'ChangeUser' in which there is a call to another stored procedure 'LogChange'. The transaction is started in 'ChangeUser'. and the last statement in the transaction is 'EXEC LogChange @p1, @p2'. My questions is if it would be correct to check in 'LogChange' the following about this transaction: 'IF @@trancount >0 BEGIN Rollback tran' END Else BEGIN Commit END.
Any help on this would be appreciated.
Dear all viewer ,
Thanks to everyone.
We are using -
MSSQL Server 2000 on windows 2000 advanced server.
PB 7.0 for client server front end tools.
Prior to few days our application works fine, rightnow it get slow or not responding after few (4/5) transaction. We don't know wht it is, If anyone has same experience so that is helpfull for us.
Thanks
R.Mall
Hi,
It is possible to write an application which monitors the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 database's transaction log and captures data modified (values after modification) by transactions? Can you point me to some tutorial and API specification?
Thanks,
Rafal
Hi,
It is possible to write an application which monitors the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 database's transaction log and captures data modified (values after modification) by transactions? Can you point me to some tutorial and API specification?
Thanks,
Rafal
hi
i want to know that how to manage the sql server transaction in a
big desktop networking application?
for example
there are 200 tables in
database. many of that tables have relatationship. i have a form in
frontend which holds nere ablut 50 tables deffrent calculated amount. i
want to ADD, EDIT and DELETE, SAVE(commit), CANCEL(roll back) them and
same time another use will do the same work from another pc. if there
are 100 user does the same work (add, edit, delete, save, cancel) how
could i magage my sql server data???
i also want to know that
1 kind of
proffessionsl way to use sql server and vb.net?
2 what kind of septs to
develop a desktop networking application with sql server?
3 how i could
manage the transaction in sql server when there are many-many user
working in the same database(add, edit, delete, save-commit,
cancel-rollback).<img src="images/emoticons/smile_baringteeth.gif">
Hi:
If I have a query: SELECT productName FROM tblProduct WHERE productID = 1
If I send this query from my application, it will pretty fast getting the result return back from SQL Server.
I use store procedure in SQL server, should also very fast.
But which one is better in terms of speed and traffic? especially when my query getting complicated and more data need to retrive. I need to decide which way (store procedure or SQL ) for my medium applicatoin.
Thank you very much.
Jt
I have an ODBC/C program and I want to call the stored proceduressp_addlogin and sp_adduser in it. Can someone please provide me withsome sample code showing the best way to do this.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,I am developing application in asp.net 2.0 using C#. My back end is sql server 2005. I also use microsoft enterprise library 2006.My problem is:First i pass three parameters to stored procedure from the application. After i increase one more parameter in both application as well as stored procedure, the application gives an error that parameter does not match with the stored procedures parameters.after couple of hours when i restart the machine and again run the application it works fine with four parameters.does sql server 2005 stores the parameters in cache??
View 3 Replies View RelatedHey all,
I've got a question and after doing some research I've found only a vague reference but no clear answer.
I have a java app that will be passing parameters to my stored procedure. I'll grab the requested info from the tables but instead of sending it back to the java app that sent the request, I need to send it to a "different" java app (the second java app will not be running at the time).
Can someone point me to a good source for executing java applications from a stored procedure?
Thanks in advance ...
tam
Hi,In SQL Books Online in the section on @@Error it gives the followingexample:-- Execute the INSERT statement.INSERT INTO authors(au_id, au_lname, au_fname, phone, address,city, state, zip, contract) values(@au_id,@au_lname,@au_fname,@phone,@address,@city,@state,@zip,@contract)-- Test the error value.IF @@ERROR <> 0BEGIN-- Return 99 to the calling program to indicate failure.PRINT "An error occurred loading the new author information"RETURN(99)ENDELSEBEGIN-- Return 0 to the calling program to indicate success.PRINT "The new author information has been loaded"RETURN(0)ENDGOHow do I access the value returned by the RETURN statement (i.e. 99 or0) in my asp application that called the stored proc.Sometimes rather than just return an integer signifying success orfailure I've seen examples where the id of the newly added item isreturned on success and perhaps -1 if the operation fails. Theseexamples make use of ouput parameters to achieve this. If theoperation succeeds then then the output parameters value is set to thenew id and this is accessed from the calling application.E.g.IF @@ERROR <> 0BEGIN-- Return -1 to the calling program to indicate failure.PRINT "An error occurred loading the new author information"SELECT @MyOuptputParameter = -1ENDELSEBEGIN-- Return id to the calling program to indicate success.PRINT "The new author information has been loaded"SELECT @MyOuptputParameter = @@IDENTITYENDWhy go to this trouble if you can use the RETURN statement?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi,
I Have created a stored procedure to use full text search and return the results back,
When i run this procedure in the query analyzer it is working fine, but when i run this procedure from asp.net application, it is returning zero rows.
I have checked all the parameters and everything in my web application, there is nothing wrong in there.
Another stored procedure which almost do the samething with some different parameters is working fine on both ends.
I am using Sql server 2005 (express) + VS.NET 2005. and using ASPNET to connect to database.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Hi,
I have a simple web application which calls a stored procedure. The stored procedure operates as a transaction and runs for several minutes. I've created a partial class to set the SQLcommand timeout property to avoid any timeouts, which works fine. Unfortunately though, when the application is run in the production environment, it ends in an error after a certain amount of time (maybe a couple of minutes - not exactly sure), which seems to be the same each run. It doesn't appear to end the stored procedure though, which results in locking the tables. It runs fine in the development environment, and it doesn't appear as though any error information is provided when the application crashes.
I'm assuming that the ASP.NET application is timing out for some reason, but the stored procedure itself is fine. I can run it directly from SQL server without any dramas. In the Virtual Directory configuration within IIS, I have the script timeout period set to 1200 seconds. The Default Web-Site timeout property is set to 120 seconds, but I'm assuming that this is only for internet connection timeout, not database transaction timeouts.
Any information as to what may be causing this is appreciated.
Thanks
I have a stored procedure that works when executed in query analyzer. (It is also way too long to post here) When called from my application ado.net returns the error:
Invalid object name #idTable
If I run the proc in query analyzer using the same parameters (copied from quickwatch while debugging) there is no error.
While very complicated, this procedure runs quickly so timing out is not an issue.
Does anyone know why a proc would run in query analyzer and not in an asp.net/c# application?
Thank you.
Hi Guys,
I am searching for some information on achieving performance improvement by spawning multiple threads in single Stored procedure or rather say within Single Database connection. We have a batch process that updates around 200 tables and each table update takes around 2 mnts. I am trying to optimize this by running these updates in parallel rather than sequential. These all tables are mutually exclusive. I have written a stored procedure which updates these tables in loop. Concern is that every update statement waits for other to get over. I am calling this Sp from Java application. One crude way will be opening multiple connections to database each running separate T-SQL statement. It comes with lot of overhead in opening connections .Is there any way I can force explicitly in T-SQL stored procedure to spawn a new thread for every Update statement. In case I try to do same process from a Java connection.. is there a way I can open multiple threads for each statement under same database connection.
Thanks,
Vikalp
I'm updating a process that recreates a large table every night. The table is the result of a bunch of nightly batch processes and holds a couple million records. In the past, each night at the end of the batch jobs the table would be dropped and re-created with the new data. This process was embodied in dynamic sql statements from an MFC C++ program, and my task is to move it to a SQL Server 2000 stored procedure that will be called from a .Net app. Here's the relevant code from my procedure:
sql Code:
Original
- sql Code
-- recreate new empty BatchTable table
print 'Dropping old BatchTable table...'
exec DropBatchTable --stored procedure called from old code that does a little extra work when dropping the table
-- validate drop
If exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[BatchTable]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1)
Begin
RAISERROR( 'Unable to drop old BatchTable!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT
End Else Begin
print 'Old BatchTable dropped.'
End
print 'Creating new BatchTable...'
SELECT TOP 0 *, cast('' as char(3)) as Client, cast('' as char(12)) as ClientDB
INTO dbo.BatchTable
FROM differentDB.dbo.BatchArchives
--validate create
If Not exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[BatchTable]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1)
Begin
RAISERROR( 'Unable to create new BatchTable!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT
End Else Begin
print 'New BatchTable Created.'
End
-- recreate new empty BatchTable table print 'Dropping old BatchTable table...' exec DropBatchTable --stored procedure called from old code that does a little extra work when dropping the table -- validate drop IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM dbo.sysobjects WHERE id = object_id(N'[dbo].[BatchTable]') AND OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1) BEGIN RAISERROR( 'Unable to drop old BatchTable!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT END ELSE BEGIN print 'Old BatchTable dropped.' END print 'Creating new BatchTable...' SELECT TOP 0 *, CAST('' AS CHAR(3)) AS Client, CAST('' AS CHAR(12)) AS ClientDB INTO dbo.BatchTable FROM differentDB.dbo.BatchArchives --validate create IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM dbo.sysobjects WHERE id = object_id(N'[dbo].[BatchTable]') AND OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1) BEGIN RAISERROR( 'Unable to create new BatchTable!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT END ELSE BEGIN print 'New BatchTable Created.' END
The print statements are there because the .net app will read them in and then write them to a log file. Some of the other mechanics are there to mimic the old process. The idea is to duplicate the old process first and then work on other improvements.
This works in Management studio. The .Net App reports that the old table was dropped, but when it tries to create the new table it complains that "There is already an object named 'BatchTable' in the database." I have verified that the old table is removed.
Any ideas on how to fix this?
in my java application I've made a call to this stored procedureCREATE procedure pruebaICM@pANI varchar(20),@pTABLA varchar(20),@pInsert varchar(500),@pUpdate varchar(1000),@pFLAG varchar(1),@pResultado int OUTPUTasbeginDECLARE @ani varchar(20)declare @cliente intDECLARE @sentencia nvarchar(1000)DECLARE @tabla nvarchar(20)DECLARE @sentencia_where nvarchar(50)DECLARE @sql nvarchar(1050)SET NOCOUNT ONset @tabla = @pTABLAset @ani = @pANISELECT @sql= N'select @cliente=count(ani) from '+ @tabla + N' whereani = ' + @aniexec sp_executesql @sql, N'@Cliente INT OUTPUT', @Cliente OUTPUTSELECT @Clienteif (@pFLAG = 'A') or (@pFLAG = 'Actualizar') or (@pFLAG = 'I')beginif (@cliente = 0)beginset @sentencia = N'insert into ' +@pTABLA + N' values (' + @pInsert + N')'EXEC sp_executesql @sentenciaset @pResultado = 1SELECT @pResultadoreturn @pResultadoendif (@cliente = 1)beginset @sentencia = N'update ' + @pTABLA +N' set ' + @pUpdateset @sentencia_where = N' where ANI =' + @pANIset @sql = @sentencia +@sentencia_whereEXEC sp_executesql @sqlset @pResultado = 2SELECT @pResultadoreturn @pResultadoendendelse if (@pFLAG = 'B') or (@pFLAG = 'Borrar')beginif (@cliente = 0)beginset @pResultado = 0SELECT @pResultadoreturn @pResultadoendelse if (@cliente = 1)beginset @sentencia = N'delete from '+@pTABLA + N' where ANI = ' + @pANIEXEC sp_executesql @sentenciaset @pResultado = 3SELECT @pResultadoreturn @pResultadoendendEXEC sp_cursorcloseendMy problem is that the ouutput param @pResultado haven't got any valueand don't return anything to the java application. How can I fix thisproblem?Thanka very much for helping me!!!!
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello, i have a problem regarding stored procedures and view server state.
I have an application with a lot of stored procedures, one of them checks data of the connected users.
In SQL 2000 i had no problem getting this information, but in SQL server 2005 i do.
my stored procedure looks like this:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dba].[applsp_GetConnectionInfo]
(
@DBName varchar(100)
)
WITH EXECUTE AS OWNER AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @sCollationMaster VARCHAR(128);
DECLARE @sSqlString VARCHAR(900);
-- Determine collation from master database because collation from master and ultimo database may differ
SELECT @sCollationMaster = CAST(databasepropertyex('master', 'Collation') AS VARCHAR);
SET @sSqlString =
'SELECT max(status) AS Status, max(isnull(SCISUSENAME, ''ULTIMOLOGIN'')) AS Login
, MAX(Rtrim(Rtrim(convert(varchar(255), nt_domain)) + nt_username)) AS NTUser
, max(Rtrim(hostname)) AS Host, MAX(Rtrim(program_name)) AS Program
FROM master.dbo.sysprocesses JOIN dba.SCONNECTIONINFO on SCISPID = CAST(spid AS VARCHAR)
AND ( SCISUSENAME = ISNULL(loginame, '''') COLLATE ' + @sCollationMaster + ' OR ISNULL(loginame, '''') = ''ULTIMOLOGIN'')
WHERE ...... AND DB_NAME(dbid) = ''' + @DBName + '''
GROUP BY hostprocess
ORDER BY Login
';
EXEC(@sSqlString);
END
I've granted view server state permissions to my user 'dba' which is the db_owner.
When i execute the query in the stored procedure seperatly as dba i get all the info i need, but when i execute the stored procedure i don't see anything.
I seem to have the same problem with sp_who2
Executing it gives me information about everyone but when i put in a stored procedure like this:
alter procedure test
with execute as owner as
begin
EXEC sp_who2
end
I just see information about myself
I need to randomly order the selected rows from my table. Is this better to do on the Application level or in a stored procedure using "orderby NewID()"?
Which is faster? There will be about 100 rows returned with 10 columns.
Hi All
I'm getting this when executing the code below. Going from W2K/SQL2k SP4 to XP/SQL2k SP4 over a dial-up link.
If I take away the begin tran and commit it works, but of course, if one statement fails I want a rollback. I'm executing this from a Delphi app, but I get the same from Qry Analyser.
I've tried both with and without the Set XACT . . ., and also tried with Set Implicit_Transactions off.
set XACT_ABORT ON
Begin distributed Tran
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 and DONE = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.WBENTRY
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.WBENTRY
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.FIXED
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.FIXED
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TSAUDIT
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.TSAUDIT
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
COMMIT TRAN
It's got me stumped, so any ideas gratefully received.Thx
I have a design a SSIS Package for ETL Process. In my package i have to read the data from the tables and then insert into the another table of same structure.
for reading the data i have write the Dynamic TSQL based on some condition and based on that it is using 25 different function to populate the data into different 25 column. Tsql returning correct data and is working fine in Enterprise manager. But in my SSIS package it show me time out ERROR.
I have increase and decrease the time to catch the error but it is still there i have tried to set 0 for commandout Properties.
if i'm using the 0 for commandtime out then i'm getting the Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.
and
Failed to open a fastload rowset for "[dbo].[P@@#$%$%%%]". Check that the object exists in the database.
Please help me it's very urgent.
I have a stored procedure that registers a user. It also checks whether an email or username exists before registering them.Does this need to be in a transaction to prevent duplication of email/username? The data is highly sensitive and should not be duplicated at all.I tried writing methods in .net like CheckEmail() and CheckUsername() but that probably wont protect against duplicates if 2 people submit at the same time on a busy server. So the next best thing is a stored procedure but should it be in a transaction or not is what I'm wondering.Thanks again,you guys are great!
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a function in which I use a stored procedure and a transaction.I use the following code, but I get the exception e (last try-catch): This SqlTransaction has completed; it is no longer usable.(btw, the SendEmail function currently returns False, so the transaction should ALWAYS roll back) Public Shared Function SaveGBEntry(ByVal myGBEntry As GBEntry, ByVal Language As String) As Boolean Dim bSuccess As Boolean = False Dim MyConnection As SqlConnection = GetConnection() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("spNewGBEntry", MyConnection) Dim fBeginTransCalled As Boolean = False Dim myTrans As SqlTransaction Try MyConnection.Open() myTrans = MyConnection.BeginTransaction() cmd.CommandType = Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Transaction = myTrans fBeginTransCalled = True Dim UserCodeOwner As Integer = UserFunctions.GetUserCode(myGBEntry.UserNameOwner) Dim OwnerEmail As String = UserFunctions.GetUserEmail(myGBEntry.UserNameOwner) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserCodeSender", myGBEntry.UserCodeSender)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@GBText", myGBEntry.Text)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@GBUpdateDate", myGBEntry.UpdateDate)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserCode", UserCodeOwner)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() myTrans.Commit()
If MailFunctions.SendEmail(myGBEntry.UserNameOwner, OwnerEmail, ConfigurationManager.AppSettings("emailINFOname"), ConfigurationManager.AppSettings("emailINFOAddress"), True, "NewGBEntry", Language) Then bSuccess = True fBeginTransCalled = False End If Catch ex As Exception GlobalFunctions.ReportError("GUESTBOOKDAL:SaveGBEntry", ex.Message) Finally If fBeginTransCalled Then Try myTrans.Rollback() Catch e As System.Exception GlobalFunctions.ReportError("GUESTBOOKDAL:SaveGBEntry", e.Message) End Try End If MyConnection.Close() End Try Return bSuccess End Function
hello,
i'm executing a select statement inside the BEGIN TRANSACTION block on a Stored Procedure. my question is, does it lock the table? actually, i'm getting the maximum value of a field and i don't want other users to read until the transaction is done. do i still need to use tablockx to manually lock the table or does the transaction handles the locking?
please help
thanks!
i have to update two tables from ASP pages with same data but i wantthat both of them should be updated at one time. If either of them isnot updated then my transaction should roll back.I want this thing tobe in a stored procedure. so that i have to write an execute statementonly on the ASP page and pass the parameters.Looking forward for ur replyDEEPAK
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
We have a database on sqlserver 2005 on a schedule for transaction log backups is in place already which is happening at interval of 30mins.All these transaction logs are appended to file called 'BKP' on E drive of our server. Now i have to configure logshipping for this database.Normally logshipping process will backup the transaction log,stores it in a shared folder on primary server and then copies the backupfile to another folder on secondary server and then restored ..plz correct me till now if im wrong.Now let us say our normal trans log backup schedule is as follows
T1 at 9.30am
T2 at 10.00am
T3 at 10.30am
T4 at 11.00 am
Now i decided to schedule the log shipping transaction log backup interval once in 30mins and start transaction log backup at following intervals
T11 AT 9.45am
T22 AT 10.15AM
T33 at 10.45AM
T44 AT 11.15AM
So T11,T22 etc these backups are restored on standby server sequentially.
Now if Primary database goes down at 11.25am , then do i have to restore the Tlogs T1,T2,T3,T4 and make the Primary database up or i should restore T1,T11,T2,T22,T3,T33,T4,T44 for making my primary database UP..
Regards
Arvind L
I am getting this error :Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new
transaction or the NULL transaction. Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web
request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and
where it originated in the code. Exception Details:
System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Distributed transaction completed. Either
enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.have anybody idea?!
i have a sequence container in my my sequence container i have a script task for drop the existing tables. This seq. container connected to another seq. container. all these are in for each loop container when i run the package it's work fine for 1st looop but it gives me error for second execution.
Message is like this:
Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.
Hi,
i am getting this error "Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.".
my transations have been done using LINKED SERVER. when i manually call the store procedure from Server 1 it works but when i call it through Service broker it dosen't work and gives me this error.
Thanks in advance.
I have a stored procedure I want to use in a transaction...I have no idea where the problem is, since I dont receive an error...but tblMessages and tblUsersAndMessages are not updated..(hence something is wrong ;))...it might be the sp or just my code...anyway..here's all the data:STORED PROCEDUREset ANSI_NULLS ONset QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONgo
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spNewMessage]@MessageID int,@UserIDSender uniqueidentifier,@MessageTitle nvarchar(50),@MessageContent text,@MessageType int,@UserID uniqueidentifier
ASBegin Set NoCount on DECLARE @WhateverID INT
INSERT INTO tblMessages(UserIDSender,MessageTitle,MessageContent,MessageType)VALUES (@UserIDSender,@MessageTitle,@MessageContent,@MessageType)
SET @WhateverID=SCOPE_IDENTITY()
INSERT INTO tblUsersAndMessages(MessageID,UserID)VALUES (@WhateverID,@UserID)
End
TABLE DEFINITIONtblUsersAndMessages allow nullsMessageID int falseUserID uniqueidentifier falseNew bit false *default set to ((1))
tblMessages allow nullsMessageID int false *PKUserIDSender uniqueidentifier falseMessageTitle nvarchar(50) trueMessageContent text trueSentDateTime datetime false * default set to (getdate())MessageType int false
THE CODE Public Shared Function SendMessage(ByVal SenderName As String, ByVal To As String), ByVal MessageTitle As String, ByVal MessageContent As String, ByVal MessageType As String) As Boolean Dim bSuccess As Boolean Dim MyConnection As SqlConnection = GetConnection() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("spNewMessage", MyConnection) Dim fBeginTransCalled As Boolean = False Dim myTrans As SqlTransaction Try MyConnection.Open() myTrans = MyConnection.BeginTransaction() cmd.CommandType = Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Transaction = myTrans fBeginTransCalled = True
Dim UserIDSender As Guid = UserFunctions.GetUserID(SenderName) Dim UserIDReceiver As Guid = UserFunctions.GetUserID(To)
'create message cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserIDSender", UserIDSender)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageTitle", MessageTitle)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageContent", MessageContent)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageType", CInt(MessageType))) 'userid receiver cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserID", UserIDReceiver))
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() myTrans.Commit() bSuccess = True fBeginTransCalled = False Catch ex As Exception Finally If fBeginTransCalled Then Try myTrans.Rollback() Catch e As System.Exception End Try End If MyConnection.Close() End Try Return bSuccess End Function
-- I made local procedure:
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to use 3 transactions in a single stored procedure.First it should update the value and then if the 1st transaction executed successfully then 2nd transaction should start,if 2nd trans executed successfully then 3rd trans should execute.After that only i want to commit all the transactions that is 1,2,3.If any of the trans fails the other shouldn't execute.How do i do this?
USE [recruit]
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[Import] Script Date: 10/15/2014 17:13:11 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER Proc [dbo].[Import]
@CustId int
[code].....
I use sp_addrolemember inside a DML trigger and every thing goes well in my computer; I can insert or update into my table and sp_addrolemember is executed successfully, but my customer get this error every time he tries to insert or update into the table.
"the procedure 'sp_addrolemember' cannot be executed within a transaction"
Can anybody help me solve this funny error.