Will SQL Server 2005 Failover Clustering Still Work When The Database Level Is Set To 80?
Nov 2, 2006
We want to use sql 2005 failover clustering feature, so that upgrade sql 2000 is necessary. But some of the stored procedures built in 2000 are not working directly in 2005, set the compatibility level to 80 could make them work. In this case, can somebody here tell me if down grade the database level will affect failover clustering running properly? e.g. will data still be synchronized properly? Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 9, 1999
I am looking in to using Microsoft Clustering supported in NT Server Enterprise to provide failover support for 2 database servers running SQL Server 7. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with it--good or bad. I read the white paper and it sounds good, but I'd like to get some real
world application experience.
Thanks for any info.
Bob
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2002
Hi all,
We are the studying the possibilty of implementing SQL - Clustering for
Failover server.
Are there any third party tools readily available.
Any suggestion or checklist ??
Any suggestions or comments will be appreciated.
Thanks and have a great day.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2008
I have 2 Windows 2003 r2 servers with a SQL failover cluster installed across the 2 node. Generally I have been running off node1 with node2 as the failover partner. I have purchased the correct licensing for noe1 and from the following I do not need to purchase a license for node2:
Failover clustering is a process where the operating system and SQL Server 2005 work together to provide availability in the event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error. Failover clustering provides hardware redundancy through a configuration in which critical resources are transferred automatically from a failing machine to an equally configured server to help ensure continuity of service.
When doing failover support, a server is designated as the passive server. The purpose of the passive server is to absorb the data and information held in another server that fails. A passive server does not need a license if the number of processors in the passive server is equal to or less than the number of processors in the active server. The passive server can take the duties of the active server for 30 days. Afterwards, it must be licensed accordingly
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/activepassive.mspx
My questions are:
1) If I switch my cluster instace to point to node2 for testing node2 in case of a failover, would I need to purchase another licence ? This means I am not doing the repointing because of an 'event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error' ? Can you please provide information from MS ?
2) How are SQL Licences bound to the windows install in a SQL Server failover cluster configuration ? For instance if node1 legitimately fails due to an 'event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error' and you failover to node2. Then you think, stuff (forget about) node1 as I have 1 set of licences for SQL Enterprise already and therefore can run with a legitimate licence on node2. Can you please clarify ?
3) I have heard that only one server needs a license in a failover cluster. Then how does this fit in with any of the questions from above:
'The passive server can take the duties of the active server for 30 days. Afterwards, it must be licensed accordingly' ?
In the event of a legitimate failure, node2 would be running off the license purchased. So why are MS restricting the use of it for 30 days ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2008
Hi All,
We're planning to install a Server 2005 Failover Cluster and I'd like to find more information about licensing, etc.
Basic questions:
- What is the best O.S. to run? Win 2003 or the new 2008? And what version (datacenter, enterprise)?
- Since I'm going to use 2 machines, will I have to pay for 2 licenses (sql and windows - two lic. each)? Or just 1 license, since just 1 machine will be the active server?
This is for some web applications, so, web environment.
Any help?
Thank you!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2007
Hi,
Please tell me that,
What is Clustering in SQL SERVER 2005 Database?
What is the main reason of Clustering in SQL SERVER 2005 Database?
What are the advantages of Clustering in SQL SERVER 2005 Database?
How can I implement Clustering in SQL SERVER 2005 Database?
waiting for your reply with thanks
T C
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2006
Hello All,
I've tried to replicated exactly what it says in the online documentation. At the end of the post are the SQL statements issued.
1. Enable encrypted outbound connections on the primary server
2. Enable encrypted outbound connections on the mirror server
3. Enable encrypted outbound connections on the witness server
4. Enable encrypted inbound connections on the primary server
5. Enable encrypted inbound connections on the mirror server
6. Enable encrypted inbound connections on the witness server
7. Set mirror''s partner to the primary
8. Set primary''s partner the mirror
9. Set principal€™s witness.
Every step run''s normally,but why can''t auto failover.
I used the following Script:
/* -------- 1. ENABLE OUTBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE PRIMARY -------- */
use master;
go
DROP USER PrincipalLogin1
DROP LOGIN PrincipalLogin1
DROP USER PrincipalLogin2
DROP LOGIN PrincipalLogin2
GO
Create login PrincipalLogin1
with password='PrincipalLogin'
go
Create user PrincipalLogin1
from login PrincipalLogin1
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Principal_Endpoint_Mirroring to PrincipalLogin1
go
---stop
create certificate MirrorCertForPartnerPub
authorization PrincipalLogin1
from file = 'd:BackupCertMirrorCertForPartner.cer';
go
Create login PrincipalLogin2
with password='PrincipalLogin'
go
Create user PrincipalLogin2
from login PrincipalLogin2
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Principal_Endpoint_Mirroring to PrincipalLogin2
go
create certificate WintnessCertForPartnerPub
authorization PrincipalLogin2
from file ='D:BackupCertCertForDBRole.cer'
GO
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET PARTNER = 'TCP://10.1.40.158:5022'
GO
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET witness = 'TCP://10.10.11.30:7000'
GO
select * from sys.certificates
/* -------- 2. ENABLE OUTBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE MIRROR -------- */
--On Mirror
--Remove the database
--Connect to either partner.
--Issue the following Transact-SQL statement:
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest SET PARTNER OFF
--Optionally, you can recover the former mirror database. On the server instance that was the mirror server, enter:
--RESTORE DATABASE Mirrortest WITH RECOVERY;
RESTORE DATABASE [Mirrortest] FROM
DISK = N'D:BackupCertMirrortest.bak'
WITH FILE = 1, NORECOVERY, NOUNLOAD, REPLACE, STATS = 10
GO
select * from sys.endpoints
drop endpoint Mirror_Endpoint_Mirroring
select * from sys.certificates
Create certificate MirrorCertForPartner
with subject ='this is the certificate for mirror',
start_date='06/25/2006'
backup certificate MirrorCertForPartner
to file='d:ackupcertMirrorCertForPartner.cer'
CREATE ENDPOINT Mirror_Endpoint_Mirroring
STATE=STARTED
AS TCP (LISTENER_PORT=5022)
FOR DATABASE_MIRRORING (
Authentication=Certificate MirrorCertForPartner
,ROLE=ALL)
GO
/* -------- 3. ENABLE OUTBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE WINTESS -------- */
--On Witness
USE [master]
GO
select * from sys.certificates
drop certificate CertForDBRole
GO
create master key
encryption by password='asdf'
Create certificate CertForDBRole
with subject='this is a certificate for pricipal role',
start_date='06/25/2006'
backup certificate CertForDBrole
to file='c:CertForDBRole.cer'
select * from sys.endpoints
drop endpoint Witness_Endpoint_Mirroring
CREATE ENDPOINT Witness_Endpoint_Mirroring
STATE=STARTED
AS TCP (LISTENER_PORT=7000)
FOR DATABASE_MIRRORING (
Authentication=Certificate CertForDBRole
,ROLE=ALL)
GO
/* -------- 4. ENABLE INBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE PRIMARY -------- */
use master;
go
DROP USER PrincipalLogin1
DROP LOGIN PrincipalLogin1
DROP USER PrincipalLogin2
DROP LOGIN PrincipalLogin2
GO
Create login PrincipalLogin1
with password='PrincipalLogin'
go
Create user PrincipalLogin1
from login PrincipalLogin1
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Principal_Endpoint_Mirroring to PrincipalLogin1
go
---stop
create certificate MirrorCertForPartnerPub
authorization PrincipalLogin1
from file = 'd:BackupCertMirrorCertForPartner.cer';
go
Create login PrincipalLogin2
with password='PrincipalLogin'
go
Create user PrincipalLogin2
from login PrincipalLogin2
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Principal_Endpoint_Mirroring to PrincipalLogin2
go
create certificate WintnessCertForPartnerPub
authorization PrincipalLogin2
from file ='D:BackupCertCertForDBRole.cer'
GO
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET PARTNER = 'TCP://10.1.40.158:5022'
GO
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET witness = 'TCP://10.10.11.30:7000'
GO
select * from sys.certificates
/* -------- 5. ENABLE INBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE MIRROR -------- */
use master;
go
DROP USER MirrorLogin1
DROP LOGIN MirrorLogin1
DROP USER MirrorLogin2
DROP LOGIN MirrorLogin2
GO
Create login MirrorLogin1
with password='MirrorLogin'
go
Create user MirrorLogin1
from login MirrorLogin1
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Mirror_Endpoint_Mirroring to MirrorLogin1
go
--stop
create certificate PrincipalCertForPartnerPub
authorization MirrorLogin1
from file = 'd:BackupCertPrincipalCertForPartner.cer';
go
Create login MirrorLogin2
with password='MirrorLogin'
go
Create user MirrorLogin2
from login MirrorLogin2
go
create certificate WitnessCertForPartnerPub
authorization MirrorLogin2
from file ='D:BackupCertCertForDBRole.cer'
GO
Grant connect on endpoint::Mirror_Endpoint_Mirroring to MirrorLogin2
go
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET PARTNER = 'TCP://10.10.116.42:5022'
GO
ALTER DATABASE Mirrortest
SET WITNESS = 'TCP://w7mis02:5024'
GO
/* -------- 6. ENABLE INBOUND CONNECTIONS ON THE WITNESS -------- */
use master;
go
DROP USER WitnessLogin1
drop login WitnessLogin1
DROP USER WitnessLogin2
drop login WitnessLogin2
Create login WitnessLogin1
with password='WitnessLogi*n@'
go
create user WitnessLogin1
from login WitnessLogin1
go
create certificate PrincipalCertForPartnerPub
authorization WitnessLogin1
from file = 'c:ackupcertPrincipalCertForPartner.cer';
go
--***************************************
Create login WitnessLogin2
with password='WitnessLogi*n@'
go
create user WitnessLogin2
from login WitnessLogin2
go
create certificate MirrorCertForPartnerPub
authorization WitnessLogin2
from file = 'c:ackupcertMirrorCertForPartner.cer';
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Witness_Endpoint_Mirroring to WitnessLogin1
go
Grant connect on endpoint::Witness_Endpoint_Mirroring to WitnessLogin2
go
All runs normally,But how can't be auto failover?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2006
Hi,
Here is my testing environment:
Database server: SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition with SP1
Application: An application developed by Visual Studio 2005 using C# (.Net framework 2.0) and ADO .Net 2.0.
Principal server: computerA
Mirror server: computerB
Witness server: computerC
Mirroring mode: High availability with auto failover
Connection String:
Data Source=computerA;Failover Partner=computerB;Initial Catalog=test_mirroring;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=sa;
Code used for failover:
while (true)
{
thisDataSet = new DataSet();
try
{
thisConnection = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
thisAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(SQL, thisConnection);
thisAdapter.Fill(thisDataSet, name);
break;
}
catch (SqlException e)
{
thisConnection = null;
thisAdapter = null;
thisDataSet = null;
}
}
Test Case:
(Part A) At the beginning of the test, computerA was in principal role. I started my testing application and connected to computerA without any problem. Then I disconnected the connection of computerA to the network by unplugging the network cable of computerA. The failover of database from computerA to computerB was carried out without problem. computerB was in principal role at that time. The application was pending for about 45 seconds and running again without problem. Then I re-connected computerA to network and it became the mirror server. computerB was still in principal role. Up to this point, all works fine, but the problem was coming next. (Part B) I disconnected computerB from network, database failover occurred, computerA became principal again. But my application cannot switch the database connection to computerA and then kept pending. Then, I re-connected computerB to network. It was surprised that the application switched the database connection to computerA successfully at that point.
My questions:
1. I think Part B is abnormal, isn€™t it? The application should be able to failover from computerB to computerA, because it works fine when failover from computerA to computerB.
2. Is there anything wrong in my code leads to the abnormal behavior of the application in Part B.
3. How can I achieve Part B? Any suggestion or idea?
Thanks for your attention.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a 2 node Microsoft 2000 cluster with a shared storage device. Iwant to create automatic failover for MS SQL 2000 server. I can dothat wit the following options:1. Active/Pasive (one instance installed)2. Active/Active (More then one instance/virtual sql serversinstalled)I have a question about option 2.Is it possible to have more then one instance/virtual SQL server,service only one database for example loadbalancing. ?, or when youcreate multiple instances/virtual SQL servers, does that mean you havemultiple databases ? If not why does a Virtual SQL server has to betaken over by a cluster node that didnt fail. Then you can actuallyuse option 1. Please advise!The documentation is not very clear on this issues.Regards,Nico de Groot
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Dear Friends,I wanted to configure Failover cluster for SQL Server 2000 on Windows2000 advanced servers.I have only 2 no.s of windows 2000 advanced server m/cs. I dont haveany shared disks and SCSI drives. Can I still configure the Failoverclustering?I would like to know more about the need for the shared disks in theFailover clustering.Please shed some light.RegardsKumar
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2007
Does anyone know how to obtain the physical server name that a SQL failover cluster instance is running on through the system tables or other database commands? Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2000
I have two SQL 7.0 SP1 (WinNT 4.0 SP 6.2) Servers using Clustering.
Problem: When SQLBox1 goes down, the Failover sends it to SQLBox2. When
SQLBox1 comes back up, the node stays on SQLBox2, instead of going back to
SQLBox1. This happens over 50% of the time, but not every time. Sometimes
it works fine.
I have done 3 hours of research, and can not find anything on this problem,
can any one a tleast point me in the right direction. I can hardly find any
troubleshooting on this issue. I do have January 2000 of the MSDN Library
installed on my machine if that helps, but there was not much on it in there
either (at least not that I found).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2004
:confused:
In evaluating/comparing MS Clustering vs Hardware Failover Blades, has anyone come across any disadvantages/concerns for a Hardware Failover Blades.
Why would you install MS SQL 2000 Clustering when you can use a Hardware Failover Blade and use a SQL 2000 standard edition. e.g In an event a hardware failure occurs the admin manager brings over a standby hardware blade and reassigns it to the SAN (on which OS and SQL 2000) is installed and you are up and running.
Would appreciate any comments and suggestions to compare these solutions.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2015
how to configure email in SQL server failover clustering. I need to configure email to send when node switches from one node to another. best way to configure email in fail over clustering?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2015
I tested the failover clustering for SQL 2008R2.When I stop the SQL server services manully, the failover did not fail to another resource. At the Faiolover cluster manager, SQl server(MSSQLSERVER)  only show the status for offline. I think it should be move to another owner intead of just show as offline.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2008
Could I implement a failover cluster solution on the two DBs which are based in two different cities?
Possible?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
Hello.
I am confuse and cant decide on how to setup high availability on our SQL 2005. Here's what on my mind and on resources list:
I plan to have mirroring on my SQL1 to SQL2 with the help of SQL3 as witness. So this would be automatic failover. My idea on mirroring is when SQL1 goes down, SQL3 would tell SQL2 to run and be the primary. It will automatically failover to SQL2. Right? My questions are:
1) How can I revert back to SQL1 once it is ready?
2) I read in one of the post that it is impossible to write in a mirrored DB, is this true? I mean, what's the use of failing over to the next node when it's not possible to write and update data/records?
3) If number 2 is false (i hope so), how would the data be synchronize from SQL2 back to SQL1. Those transaction that were made while SQL1 is down.
4) How about the connection string from the web applications? Would it be automatically point to SQL2? We have load balancing setup in place, would this help web application connection to automatically point to SQL2?
Another setup:
We have SAN in place (not yet used, but is planning to use for this SQL thing), EMC to be specific. My question would be:
1) For SAN setup, the data storage would be centralize. So would that mean that SQL1 and SQL2 services will use the same data and log file from the SAN storage?
2) How would you call this setup then? Can this be clustering type of high availability? Will clustering work under load balancing setup? I believe mirroring is not possible here? Right?
3) How can I setup my 3 SQL servers with the same theory in mind: when SQL1 goes down, SQL2 will take over. Data will be synchronize when SQL1 is up and running again. With automatic failover and reverting back to primary.
I read so much topics about this, but the more I research, the more I get confuse.
Any suggestions, comments, advice is greatly appreciated!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2007
I installed SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition. When i create a new database (using the "New Database" dialog) i cannot set the new database's compatibility level to "SQL Server 2005(90)" because this option is not in the "dropdown list". the only items shown are: "SQL Server 7.0(70)" and "SQL Server 2000(80)". I set the owner to "sa". How do i get "SQL Server 2005(90)" in my "compatibility level" drop down list? Is this an installation option that i missed? Thanks in advance for any assistance!
-chris
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2015
I am setting up my first sql node on a 2 node cluster and runing into this
The disks are already added into the failover cluster manager
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2004
Howdy,
Is SQL 2000 clustering on windows 2000 any good ??
We are looking at spending *quite* a bit of money to implement it, but I need opinions of what its like from the people that actually use it & look after it.
e.g.
DOES IT WORK LIKE IT SHOULD????????
Is it reliable?
Is it resource hungry?
Are there lots of bugs?
All repsonses very welcome. No response too small.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
SG.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2007
We have 2 env. : Testing and Production, both are running Windows 2003 Enterprise Server with SQL Server 2005. The difference is Testing is NOT running Windows cluster but Production do so, what is the best way to transfer a database from testing to production?
We have another systems that both testing and production are running on NON-cluster and we use backup/restore to transfer the database, can it apply in this case.
And I found that there are a tools called DTC, which can transfer all DB objects from one DB to another, is it a best way to transfer between non-cluster and cluster env.?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
Hi,
Would anyone give me some directions on where I could get good information on Windows 2003 and SQL 2005 clustering??
Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2007
We have a Prinicipal, a Mirror and a Witness server. We have automatic failover configured between the Prinicipal and Mirrored server. When we stop MMSQL service on Prinicipal, not all the databases failover to the Mirrored instance.
Any suggestions would be welcomed as we have a tight deadline to get this in Production.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2008
Friends -
I am going to install sql server 2005 clustering on windows 2003 o/s.
i am using active/passive clustering.
On node : 1 i created a shared disk, quorum, volume1, volume 2 under disk management.
my doubt is do i need to do the same thing again on node :2 like (create shared disk, quorum, volume1, volume 2 same as node:1
Please advise on this.
Cheers:)
vsh
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2006
Hi,
Pl clarify how to use SQL server 2005 clustering Algorythm , I want to use the case and nested table concept. Pl let me know what is key column , Input and product with an example
I have table in the following structure
Cust_id
Age
Product
Location
Income
the above mentioned columns are in my tableand i want to perdict which product is mostly likely to sold with other based on age , location and income
Pl clarify and mail me on rajesh.ladda@lntinfotech.com
Thanks in advance
Rajesh Ladda
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2007
I am getting ready to have a SQL Server failover cluster setup. I have used SQL 2000 for years, mostly for DTS and related database activities, but NOT in a cluster. I have used SQL 2005 for about one year but not intensively, and NOT in a cluster.
We need to set up a cluster. We are setting up a DELL EMC solution. I am going to hire a consultant to set it up, including the SQL part. My questions are should I use SQL 2000 or 2005? (I don't know if one is better than the other for clustering. Both are supported by our vendor for the application we are running.) How hard is it to maintain a cluster if one hasn't had experience in that area before? How should I prepare?
Any opinions or experiences that you would like to share would be helpful.
Thank you.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2015
1. Once fail over to secondary replica, what will happen to connected session in primary node? can the session fail over to secondary seamlessly or need to re-login. what happen committed transactions which has not write to disk.
2. Assume I have always on cluster with three nodes, if primary fails, how second node make write/ read mode.
3. after fail over done to 2nd secondary node what mode in production(readonly or read write).
4. how to rollback to production primary ,will change data in secondary will get updated in primary.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2007
Hi,
We have SQL 2005 2 node active-active clustering with 2 instances on each node.(total 4 instances).
Is it possible to apply Service packs to just 1 instance or does it impact all 4 instances on both nodes ?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
I am developing an enterprise class solution using SQL Server 2005 and MS .NET v2 and am tying determine if SQL Server 2005 (which edition and if so how) would be adequate for my proposed solution. Any feedback, tips, comments would be greatly appreciated.
As a background the solution I am developing will be web services based and used by multiple offices around the globe by over 500 users. I have already developed a prototype using a single SQL Server 2005 instance but as this solution is going to be used by offices around the world I want to have an IIS Server and SQL Server 2005 server instance in each office with "links" back to the primary SQL Server 2005 cluster in Australia.
One of my thoughts was to set up replication between the offices that would happen at midnight remote office local time and then set up triggers to update the primary cluster when assoociated data was changed on the remote sites or on the primary cluster. Does anyone know or can anyone suggest alternatives to this strategy?
I effectively need some sort of inter site caching functionality with store and foreward capabilities ...
Thanks
Andrew
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2006
We have sql server 2005 installed locally on 2 servers and want to set up failover clustering. Do we need to uninstall what we have then install as failover cluster? Thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2007
Hello all,
I have tried to install SQL Server 2005 Standard edition with CLUSTERING. I faced a problem and everything rolls back.
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup
------------------------------
SQL Server Setup was unable add user domain1xyz to local group domain1IT Security Admin-Group.
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkID=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.1399.06&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=29512&EvtType=sqlca%5csqlsecurityca.cpp%40Do_sqlGroupMember%40Do_sqlGroupMember%40x6ba
I have refered to PostI=1659185 posted by Fly and it still won't be able to fix my problem.
I have added LOCAL SERVICE into the local group (SQLServer2005MSFTEUser$AAA$MSSQLSERVER), but it still can't work.
Please can someone help me on this. Thank a lot....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2008
Hi all,
I need some help to known more about basics of SQL Server 2005 failover cluster . pls provide me link to
known the concept.
Thanks,
Nav
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2008
I've never performed this type of installation. Any tips/ tricks you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
View 10 Replies
View Related
