Windows 2003 SP1 Comaptibility With SQL Server 2000 (SP3)
Jun 22, 2006
Hello there,
We got SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3 running on Windows 2003 server.
Now, we would like to apply windows 2003 SP1 to the Operating System.
We are concerned that whether windows 2003 SP1 is compatible with SQL server 2000 (SP3)?
I was looking at the application comaptibility chart for Windows 2003 SP1.Among them SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 3a was listed but not the Standard Edition.
My Question - Is windows 2003 server SP1 is compatible with SQL Server 2000 (SP3)?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 26, 2004
Hello y'all,
I have to do a new install of SERVER 2000 using WINDOWS 2003 . Has anyone done this. If so, what are the steps. Should I expect any problems ? Any help appreciated.
Thanx
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I have XP workstations and windows 2003 SBS. I setup an ODBC for anapplication (tried both User and System DSN), but after a few usage, I getthe following error:Connection failed:SQLState: 'HY000'SQL Server Error: 0[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Cannot generate SSPI context.Any ideas? Is this a bug?--Thank youPlease post only
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
Does SQL Server 2000 CE 2.0 work on Windows Mobile 2003?
Thank you,
Ken Carlino
ServiceMaster
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2006
I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise x64 edition cluster setup and functioning normally. Now, I am trying to get SQL Server 2000 installed as a failover cluster but am having some difficulty. When installing, I get the message '[sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed' in the event log. The message happens when the installer is trying to bring the SQL Server Service resource online.
I am able to ping the name of the instance successfully. I am able to manually start the 'MSSQL$InstanceName' service. I have turned off the firewall on both machines, but this did not help. I have the DTC Service setup as a resource in the same cluster group.
I also read http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;815431 which seemed promising, but did not reolve the problem.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Andy
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2006
I have a mobile device application using mobile sql 2005 replicating with sql 2000 in a x86 environment. This works fine!
I'm having issues getting this to work under Windows Server 2003 X64.
I've got all the components installed under the X64 environment including CLR 2.0 X64 and the mobile sql tools. the but when I run the Configure Web Synchronization Wizard I get the following error. SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition Server Tools were not found on the IIS server. Run the SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition Server Tools installer....
My question is: Were do I get the X64 version of these tools?
sqlce30setupen.msi
sql2Ken@P4.msi
The SQL environment is X86 as follows: SQL2000 SP4
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
Any help would be much appreciated!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,I have a Windows 2003 server, which is also a terminal server forapplication, with sql 2000 installed. My company has developed anapplication that uses SQL 2000 as its database. The application is aclient/server one. In each client computer there's a link to theapplication on the server. There is no problem with Windows 98,Windows 2000 pro, Windows xp pro clients, but the windows 95 onescannot log in to the database. The log of the application shows thefollowing error:connection error -2147467259. Cannot open database requested in login'database name'. Login fails.Till a week ago the application was running on a Windows 2000 serverwith SQL 2000 install and the W95 clients had no problem connecting tothe database, so my guess is the error has something to do withWindows 2003 server, but what'causing the error?I tried to install a newer version of MDAC (MDAC 2.5, the last versionof MDAC you can install on W95)but with no success. By the way W95clients have no problem accessing shared folder on the Windows 2003server.Any idea?ThanksMarino
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2006
Hi all,I just asked some people to help me out and phone microsoft with thefollowing information, kindly they refused unless we setup a supportcontract with them first, for pre-sales information. (That really doesnot sound like good business sense to me - anyway here is our problem,if anyone could help thanks)."To tell and ask microsoft:We will be setting up a microsoft sql server 2000 instance running on awindows 2003 server.1) We need to check this can run alongside a microsoft 2003 sql server(either workgroup or standard edition), on the same machine. Are thereany .dll clashes if we do this? If there are can we run SQL Server2000, in a virtual machine running windows 2000 professional. (I have alicenced copy we can use for this).2) If we run one instance of 2000, and one of 2003 of the sql servers,can one use the processor licence model, and one use the CAL licencemodel."Thanks for any help, and any idea why they actually force you to usenews groups for pre-sales information?David
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2004
My uncle runs a small networking company and has extra licenses for Windows 2003 Server as well as SQL Server 2000. Since I just graduated from college and have started working as a database programmer (for a different company) I'd like to setup a small server at home to learn more about SQL (as well as networking, but SQL is my primary concern). I know I can setup SQL Server 2000 on my main PC, but I'd still like to set everything up in a server environment.
So, what I'm wondering is if any books (or web sites?) exist that walk you through setting up Windows 2003 Server and SQL Server 2000. I've actually set these up before (it's not very complicated) but I'm not sure if I did it the "correct" way.
Ideally if any books exist on O'Reilly's Safari Bookshelf that would be even better.
Thanks in advance,
John
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2008
We got SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3 running on Windows 2003 Standard Edition server.
Now, we would like to apply windows 2003 SP2 to the Operating System.
We are concerned that whether windows 2003 SP2 is compatible with SQL server 2000 (SP3)?
I was looking at the application compatibility chart for Windows 2003 SP2.Among them Microsoft SQL Server Standard (2000) was listed but with no Service pack details. And also does Standard means standard edition there?
My Question - Is windows 2003 server SP2 compatible with SQL Server 2000 (SP3) Standard Edition? And what if I plan to apply SP4 to Sql Server ?
Please help. Thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2007
Hi!!
I'moving my asp application to a new hosting server.
So when i tried the setup locally with the live DB & application in my test machine...
The DB access is denied when application tries to hit the DB.
DB is in seperate machine with SQL Server 2000 & application(ASP) is in Windows server 2003.....
Kindly help me with your suggestions....on what went wrong?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2007
Currently a server running 2003 small business operating system has MSDE 2000 and Microsoft##SSEE.
A memory problem exists with SQL consuming over 50% of RAM. Total RAM is 4GB.
There is a SQL 2000 patch for this type of problem. However, it calls for SQL to be upgraded to SP4.
Problem:
Can this MSDE 2000 be upgraded with SP4 and have memory patch applied with Microsoft##SSEE also on this box?
Please let me know. Thank you.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2006
Where can I further educate myself on this subject?
Right off from the start I would assume that installing SQL Server 2000 or 2005 on Windows Server 2003 that is set up as a web server hosting a website would be against "best practices." Is my assumption right?
Common sense tells me to not to host a website on a pc that is also hosting my database.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2008
set up windows 2003 serversql server 2000have public IP from netword soluctionsI can see websitewhat settings to i need to open up sql server to the public?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2006
Dear Sir,
I would like to use sql server 2000 as datasource with visaul web developer express.
My concern here is it compatilbe ?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
Hi,
I am having a problem connecting my .net applications from the application server to the database server. When I run the application from my windows xp (sp2) box it works fine. When I try to connect via SQL Management Studio to the database server from the application server I get the same error.
Here is the error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
Here is the Environment:
App Server:
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
Inside Company's Firewall/ Network
Database Server:
Windows Server 2000 Advanced Edition
SQL Server 2000 SP4
Remote Connections to the Server is checked
Enable Protocols: Named Pipes & TCP/IP
TCP/IP Port: 1402 (I don't know why it isn't the default of 1433)
The db server is sitting out side the Company's firewall (don't ask me why). I can access it fine from inside the firewall on my XP box but not from windows server 2003. There is a web server outside the our network that also connects to the db server with no problem and that is running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition.
I can ping the db server from the app server using the IP address.
I tried using the IP address and the port 1402 in my connection string but that didn't work from any machine (XP and Server).
I imagine the issue is somehow related to the company's firewall but why would it only block Windows Server 2003 and not XP?
What do I tell the network admin to change?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Oran
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
Hello ALL
I have configured a website on a windows 2003 server, while its database is residing on a remote server with sqlserver 2000 database. In the connection string, I use the server IP address for the remote SQL server, and when the website is browsed, i get an error something similar to the one below:
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
If I test the same website on windows XP, it will connect to the remote server without a problem. Can Anyone please give me a tip about the windows operating system, what should I do to over come this?
Thanks in advance
regards,
Mykhan
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2005
Hi friends...
can anyone help about how can use this combo..
MSSQL Server 2000 - PHP - Windows 2003 server - IIS 6.0?
can i use like this ?
please reply if anyone know
Regards..
Navvin
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,Is it possible to install on a Windows server 2003,SQL SERVER 2000 in the folowing configuration :SQL server 7.0 as a default InstanceandSQL server 2000 as a named instance.Thanks for your answer.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2005
I have a SQL 2000 DB server running win 2k.
I have just recently bought a new webserver that has 2003 server installed on it.
When I try to connect to SQL (through a webapp) using integrated security I get the error message
Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYANONYMOUS LOGON'
I've tried configuring an application pool to run as a domain user and place the web app into the app pool but the pool fails.
The event viewer has an error message that reads
IDENTITY OF THE APPLICATION POOL IS INVALID
I've even tried congifuring the process model section of the machine.config to run as a domain user. Its almost as if the identity is not getting passed over to sql.
any ideas please!!!!!!!!!
This is driving me nutZZZZZZ
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2006
Any know issues installing SQL Server 2000 ( Enterprise and Standard ) on Windows 2003 Server?
Thx
Venu
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I have several database on a Windows Server 2003. I re-registered this SQLserver, which is local, and after that I cannot see any of the databases inthe Enterprise Manager. The databases still work, since my applications workfine. I have no clue how can I make these databases visible in EnterpriseManager. I tried registering this SQL Server in Enterprise Manager underWindows accounts and SQL Server accounts. Nothing works.Can anybody help?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2007
Hello people,
I currently have a SQL Std Srv 2000 v 8.0.760 sp3 running on a Windows 2003 Server without SP1.
The business application using the SQL is Optika Acorde v4.0.
I have just been brought on to help bring the servers up to date.
Unfortunately when SP1 was applied the server failed to reboot.
We brought everything back to life with a back up.
Now it is my intention to build a new server while the other one remains as is for now.
How would one suggest installing the SQL 2K Std Srv on the W2K3 Std Srv?
1. Bring the W2k3 server to life with all patches then install SQL w/ sp4 and install the application, then migrate the data over?
2. Install Win2K3, install SQL 2K -> sp4, and install the W2K3 sp1...
3. Install Win2K3, install SQL 2K -> W2k3sp1 -> SQL 2K sp4...
Ok I see countless opportunities to debate these possibilities, but there has to be some kind of best practices on a recommended procedure.
Thank you for your time,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
When windows 2003 server is not log on to the domain, SQL worksfine.(workgroup) Everyone can connect to SQL. When everyone is on thedomain, nothing can connect remotely to SQL.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2006
I'm working on deploying an ASP.NET 2.0 app onto a Windows 2003 server and I'm having trouble with SQL 2000 authentication. When I run my app from my development box running IIS 5.1 I have no problems. In order to get it to work on my this machine, I had set the account for anonymous access to run under an ASPNETDOMAIN account and configured my SQL database to allow this account.On the Windows 2003 box with IIS 6.0, I've done the same thing with anonymous access for the web app, and also created an application pool that the app runs under and have set the application pool to run under the same account. It appears the app is looking for a local SQL 2005 instance (which doesn't exist). Why would it do this and what do I need to change for this to work?Error:An error has occurred while establishing a connection to
the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be
caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not
allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26
- Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)Stack Trace:[SqlException (0x80131904): An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +735043 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +188 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(Boolean& useFailoverPartner, Boolean& failoverDemandDone, String host, String failoverPartner, String protocol, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean aliasLookup) +820 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +628 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +170 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) +130 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreateNonPooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPoolGroup poolGroup) +27 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +47 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111 System.Web.Management.SqlServices.GetSqlConnection(String server, String user, String password, Boolean trusted, String connectionString) +68
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I installed MS SQL 2000 on a Windows 2003 server cluster (no servicepacks). Both nodes are online and both domain controllers are online.I tried to install SP3 and got the following error:--------------Logon Account could not be validated.No authority could be contacted for authentication.---------------I installed SQL SP 2 and did not get the error but I do get it everytime I try to install SP3.Does anybody have an idea that might help resolve the problem.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2007
Windows 2003 backup utility uses the shadow copy option that allows it to copy open files.
Therefore, can I use this utility to backup the .mdf and .ldf files for my SQL 2000 database?
I can then attach the .mdf files if I need to restore the database to another server.
Can anyone tell me if this is safe? I've tried it and it worked but I'm worried there maybe some lurking danger in using this approach.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2006
Hi
we have a windows 2003 server with 4 xeon 3Gh and 8 gb of memory.
Now, when run a query or when click for properties is slowwwww very slow.
No error in the event view
Any idea
TIA
Abel
:angel:
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2004
Can anyone confirm that SQL 2000 Standard Edition is still limited to 2GB of memory utilization on Windows 2003 Server?
In addition, anyone have suggestions for deploying SQL 2000 on Windows 2003?
TIA
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi !when installing sqlserver 2000 on a Windows 2003 server it explicitlytells "server not compatible with Windows 2003" during install, but itcan carry on.After we applied serfice pack 3a then the db server seems to runnormally, but does it risk to behave randomly afterwards ???Is sqlserver 2000 standard edition compatible with Windows 2003 server?Or does it exist a specific sqlserver edition for Win2003 ?thanks !Patrice
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
Can SQL 2000 32 bit run on a Windows 2003 64-bit Intel OS installation? What about the SQL 2000 64 bit version? Is the Enterprise Edition required for this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2006
I have been running Windows 2003 64bit and SQL2000 SP4 for over 2 months with out any issues.
Sadly we had a server crash "NTldr missing or corrupted"
now when the one engineer looked at it he suggested to reload the server with Windows 2003 32 bit version as there were known compatibility problems between 2003 64bit and SQL 2000 32bit but that you can install SQL 2000 32bit onto a Windows 2003 64 bit server.
Now i dont really believe this statement nor can i find any documentation supporting this. I believe this server might have crashed due to a new patch that was released the last 2 or 3 week either on Windows or SQL. Does anyone know where i can verify what patches was released?
Maybe someone else can share their thoughts with me.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2008
After differential restore I start Remedy service. It starts in few seconds.
After full restore the same service takes 15 minutes to start. Bothe the things are done through SQL service agent. Even manual restaring the service also takes 15 minutes after full restore. WHy is it happening this way?
View 5 Replies
View Related
