I am trying to create a SQL data adapter via the wizard, however, I get
the error "Invalid object name #ords" because the stored procedure uses
a temp table. Anyway around this? Thanks.
What is the best way to store images in sql server and then retrieve them with stored proc's using vb.net/asp.net? There seems to be a lot of different opinions about just saving the img tag, the path, etc.
I only need to store 15 icons....
appreciate any help I can get.
Thanks
soggy coder seattle
I am trying to take a table of Customer locations and making a single string out of them. Any help would be appreciated.
Example:
CustomerLocation = "Web"
CustomerLocation = "North Carolina"
function call..
getCustomerLocations()
output:
Web,North Carolina
:confused:
I have been working for days to translate a report out of an old system and in SQL reporting services.
Getting the basic code down to get the required data was easy, however getting it to work in reporting services has turned into a nightmare.
Why, because I have been told that SQL reporting services does not allow temporary tables...HUH!
Ok, so how am I supposed to take three data queries and munge them together into a report.
Here is the query that does work, can anyone give me an idea of how to make this work given the limitations I have run up against.
I have already thought of using a store procedure, but we have ruled that out since would likely have to do it via linked servers, which would be expensive. We thought of having it just create and then link real tables and then delete them...not sure thats going to work, and again probably talking linked servers to get that to work.
Code:
select distinct al3.asg_location into ##tmp1
from dbo.probsummarym2 AL3
inner join dbo.probsummarym1 AL1 on AL3.number=AL1.number
where AL1.assignment='international client services'
AND AL1.status='Closed'
AND AL1.close_time BETWEEN {ts '2006-05-28 00:00:00.000'} AND {ts '2006-06-04 00:00:00.000'}
and al3.asg_location is not null
SELECT AL3.asg_location as asg_location, Count (AL3.resolve_met) as met_sla into ##tmp2
FROM dbo.probsummarym1 AL1, dbo.probsummarym2 AL3
WHERE (AL3.number=AL1.number)
AND (AL1.severity_code<>'Scheduled'
AND AL1.status='Closed'
AND AL1.close_time BETWEEN {ts '2006-05-28 00:00:00.000'} AND {ts '2006-06-04 00:00:00.000'}
AND AL3.resolve_met='t'
AND AL1.assignment='international client services'
)
GROUP BY AL3.asg_location
SELECT AL3.asg_location as asg_location, Count (AL1.status) as sch_closed into ##tmp3
FROM dbo.probsummarym1 AL1, dbo.probsummarym2 AL3
WHERE (AL3.number=AL1.number)
AND (AL1.assignment='international client services'
AND AL1.severity_code='Scheduled'
AND AL1.status='Closed'
AND AL1.close_time BETWEEN {ts '2006-05-28 00:00:00.000'} AND {ts '2006-06-04 00:00:00.000'}
)
GROUP BY AL3.asg_location
SELECT AL3.asg_location as asg_location, Count (AL1.status) as unsch_closed into ##tmp4
FROM dbo.probsummarym1 AL1, dbo.probsummarym2 AL3
WHERE (AL3.number=AL1.number)
AND (AL1.assignment='international client services'
AND AL1.severity_code<>'Scheduled'
AND AL1.status='Closed'
AND AL1.close_time BETWEEN {ts '2006-05-28 00:00:00.000'} AND {ts '2006-06-04 00:00:00.000'}
)
GROUP BY AL3.asg_location
select ##tmp1.asg_location, ##TMP3.sch_closed, ##tmp2.met_sla, ##tmp4.unsch_closed
from ##tmp1 left outer join ##tmp2 on ##tmp1.asg_location = ##tmp2.asg_location
left outer join ##tmp3 on ##tmp1.asg_location = ##tmp3.asg_location
left outer join ##tmp4 on ##tmp1.asg_location = ##tmp4.asg_location
group by ##tmp1.asg_location, ##TMP3.sch_closed, ##tmp2.met_sla, ##tmp4.unsch_closed
order by ##tmp1.asg_location
drop table ##tmp1, ##tmp2, ##tmp3, ##tmp4
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
Basically, I want to be able to have a stored procedure that will search through all the stored procedures looking for a given string and returning the names of all the stored procs that contain that string value.
I know I can script it off and then do a text search in Notepad or whatever, but I figured there must be a more elegant way to do it. More than likely dealing with the DB sys tables.
Is there already a tool in SQL Server that does this? Or has anybody had a chance to roll their own?
Thanks,
Tim
Creating a temporary table in stored procedure and using a sql query to insert the data in temp. table.I am facing the error as :
String or binary data would be truncated.The statement has been terminated.
The procedure i created is as :
ALTER PROCEDURE fetchpersondetails
AS
CREATE Table #tempperson (personID int,FirstName nvarchar(200),LastName nvarchar(250),title nvarchar(150),Profession nvarchar(200),StreetAddress nvarchar(300),
StateAddress nvarchar(200),CityAddress nvarchar(200),CountryAddress nvarchar(200),ZipAddress nvarchar(200),Telephone nvarchar(200),Mobile nvarchar(200),
Fax nvarchar(200),Email nvarchar(250),NotesPub ntext,Affiliation nvarchar(200),Category nvarchar(200))
Insert into #tempperson
SELECT dbo.tblperson.personID, ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.fName, N'') + ' ' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.mName, N'') AS FirstName, dbo.tblperson.lname AS LastName,
dbo.tblperson.honor AS Title, dbo.tblperson.title AS Profession, dbo.tblperson.street + ' ' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.suite, N'') AS StreetAddress,
dbo.tblperson.city AS cityaddress, dbo.tblperson.state AS stateaddress, dbo.tblperson.postalCode AS zipaddress,
dbo.tblperson.Phone1 + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.Phone2, N'') + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.Phone3, N'') AS Telephone,
dbo.tblperson.mobilePhone AS mobile, dbo.tblperson.officeFax + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.altOfficeFax, N'') + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.altOfficeFax2,
N'') AS Fax, ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.Email1, N'') + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.Email2, N'') + ',' + ISNULL(dbo.tblperson.Email3, N'') AS Email,
dbo.tblperson.notes AS NotesPub, dbo.tblOrganizations.orgName AS Affiliation, dbo.tblOrganizations.orgCategory AS Category,
dbo.tblCountry.countryNameFull AS countryaddress
FROM dbo.tblperson INNER JOIN
dbo.tblOrganizations ON dbo.tblperson.orgID = dbo.tblOrganizations.orgID INNER JOIN
dbo.tblCountry ON dbo.tblperson.countryCode = dbo.tblCountry.ISOCode
please let me know the solurion of this error.
I'm so desperate, I'll pay $100 to the proper solution to this problem. I'm sure it's an easy fix, but I'm wasting more money every day trying to figure it out...
I have a table with hierarchial data in it (see the bottom tabledef) and I need to query an "indented outline" of the records in it for a tree control on a website. To do that I have to perform some sort of recursive or nested query or I can do all that manipulation in a temporary table/cursor... However, even though the resultset will display when I check the query, when I try to open it using ADO, I get a recordcount of -1.... it's very frustrating and extremely important.
I'd rather pay an expert here than try to navigate a tech help line.
ConnIS is defined in an earlier include file...
Set oCmd = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command")
Set oCmd.ActiveConnection = ConnIS
oCmd.CommandText = "dbo.Expandset" 'Name of SP
oCmd.CommandType = adCmdStoredProc 'ADO constant for 4
Set oTmp = oCmd.CreateParameter("@current", adInteger, adParamInput,, 892)
oCmd.Parameters.Append oTmp
Set oRs = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
oRs.Open oCmd
Response.Write oRs.RecordCount & "<hr>"
oRs.Close
Set oRs=Nothing
This code generates the following result when run from an active server page:
-1<hr>
When I execute the raw SQL code ("exec Expandset 892") against the stored proc in the query analyzer, I get:
item tier
----------- -----------
892 1
948 2
895 2
946 2
945 2
893 2
894 3
944 2
943 2
904 2
896 3
897 4
901 2
903 3
902 3
900 2
947 2
899 2
The source for the stored proc is:
------------------------------------------------------
CREATE PROCEDURE Expandset (@current int) as
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @level int, @line char(20)
CREATE TABLE #stack (item int, tier int)
CREATE TABLE #output (item int, tier int)
INSERT INTO #stack VALUES (@current, 1)
SELECT @level = 1
WHILE @level > 0
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM #stack WHERE tier = @level)
BEGIN
SELECT @current = item
FROM #stack
WHERE tier = @level
SELECT @line = space(@level - 1) + convert(varchar,@current)
INSERT INTO #output (item, tier) values (@current, @level)
DELETE FROM #stack
WHERE tier = @level
AND item = @current
INSERT #stack
SELECT ID, @level + 1
FROM SITE_Container
WHERE parent = @current
IF @@ROWCOUNT > 0
SELECT @level = @level + 1
END
ELSE
SELECT @level = @level - 1
END
SELECT O.item, O.tier FROM #output O
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The relevant portions of the Table definitions for SITE_Container are:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[SITE_Container] (
[ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[Parent] [int] NULL)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
My contact information is:
Jared Nielsen
PO Box 600271
Jacksonville, FL 32260
904-230-1688
888-316-2357 vm / fax
Is there a way to namespace groups of stored procs to reduce confusion when using them?
For C# you can have ProjectName.ProjectSection.Classname when naming a class. I am just wondering if there is a way to do the same with SQL stored procs. I know Oracle has packages and the name of the package provides a namespace for all of the stored procs inside it.
Hi
I have one stored procedure which uses temp tables in it .
I am trying to use this stored procedure in my SSRS report as the source.
I am getting an error which says that the temporary table doesnot exist while validating the sql syntax in report.
Also, this stored proc executes in SSMS ithout any problem and giving the result as desired.
Can we use Temp tables in Stored proc and call that in SSRS?
If not, what is the workaround for that.
Thanks
If you use a stored procedure that references one or more temp tables as data dource for a report, you get an error saying that the temp tables cannot be found when you click on the Layout tab. This happens even if you have executed the query in the Data tab before going to the Layout tab. The work around is to simply ignore the error but it is a distraction for the user. Is this a known big that is going to be fixed in a future release?
View 3 Replies View RelatedAre they unique to a user/session? Like if 2 users simultaneously run the stored procedure?
TIA!
Hi I have the following Stored Proc which works in SQL Server 6.5 but not in SQL Server 7.0. All this Stored Proc does is Create a temp table, execute the DBCC ShowContig on a table and insert the results of the DBCC into a temp table. What am I missing. Thanks.
The code of the Stored Proc is:
/* This Stored Procedure Creates a temp table. (Step 1) */
/* Initializes a local variable @StirngToBeExecuted with */
/* a DBCC command. (Step 2) */
/* Step 3. The Command is Executed and the results of the */
/* DBCC command is inserted into Temp Table. */
/* Step 4. The results of the Temp table are shown on the */
/* Screen. */
/* This SQL Works Fine in SQL Server Version 6.5 */
/* In SQL Server 7.0 the results of the DBCC command is */
/* NOT getting inserted into the Temp table. WHY??? */
IF EXISTS (SELECT * from sysobjects where id = object_id('dbo.Test_sp') and sysstat & 0xf = 4)
drop procedure dbo.Test_sp
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE Test_sp
AS
DECLARE
@StirngToBeExecuted Varchar(100)
CREATE TABLE #temp( -- Step 1
OutputOfExecute Varchar(255)
)
-- Step 2
SELECT @StirngToBeExecuted = 'DBCC SHOWCONTIG (123456789)'
INSERT
INTO #temp exec (@StirngToBeExecuted) -- Step 3
SELECT * FROM #temp -- Step 4
DROP TABLE #temp --Drop the Temp Table
I have an sql file that contains several queries that are generating numbers to populate a sql table. The sql file is too large for a single sp so I am nesting them. I have 4 nested stored procedures. Each of the queries in each stored procedure dumps into its own global temp table. The final stored procedure needs to insert into a sql table all the information gathered in the global temp tables. So the final stored proc. looks something like:
"Create procedure usp_myProc_4 AS EXEC usp_myProc_3
INSERT INTO mySQLTable (a,b,c)
SELECT a, b, c FROM ##myTempTable (which was created in usp_myProc_1)
INSERT INTO mySQLTable (a,b,c)
SELECT a, b, c FROM ##myOtherTempTable
INSERT INTO......etc;"
I have done this befor and it worked fine. The only difference is that when I did this before these insert statements were being called from within an sp_makewebtask procedure.
Now when I try to save this final stored procedure it tells me "Invalid Object Name: ##myTempTable"
How do I call on these global temp tables from my final nested stored procedure?
Thanks for any help.
This is killing me...and not slowly.
I have a stored procedure (a) which calls another stored procedure (b).
Stored procedure (b) is a C# stored procedure which simply writes out to a file data in XML format. Internally, it calls...select fld1, fld2, fld3, fld4, fld5from #tmptable for xml auto, elements
If I call stored procedure (a) from Query Analyser / SQL Management Studio everything works fine. Perfect.
But....we need this all to run asynchronously. So we used the Service Broker, configured the queues and messages and off we went. All worked as planned except our XML files were empty.
Further investigation showed that if we call select fld1, fld2, fld3, fld4, fld5from #tmptable
- without the 'xml' bits, we got a resultset back. But if we call it with the for xml auto, elements, the reader was empty. No errors are visible in the profiler, but the XmlReader refuses to read.
The binary / extended stored procedure is the same pysical binary that is called from Query analyser that works, but via the Service Broker refuses to do anything XML based. Outputting the data as normal text is cool, but not what we want.
----------------- UPDATE --------------
I changed the code so the CLR Stored proc was fired as a trigger on an update to a table. If I update the table in Query analyser, the trigger fires, the CLR Stored proc is called, the XML is generated.
If I update the table as part of my message handling in the Service Broker queue, the trigger is fired, the CLR Stored proc is called, the XML is generated EMPTY!!! The other TSQL statements work fine, but selecting for xml simply will not work for a procedure called, either implicitly or explicitly from the service broker.
Hi all,
Looking at BOL for temp tables help, I discover that a local temp table (I want to only have life within my stored proc) SHOULD be visible to all (child) stored procs called by the papa stored proc.
However, the following code works just peachy when I use a GLOBAL temp table (i.e., ##MyTempTbl) but fails when I use a local temp table (i.e., #MyTempTable). Through trial and error, and careful weeding efforts, I know that the error I get on the local version is coming from the xp_sendmail call. The error I get is: ODBC error 208 (42S02) Invalid object name '#MyTempTbl'.
Here is the code that works:SET NOCOUNT ON
CREATE TABLE ##MyTempTbl (SeqNo int identity, MyWords varchar(1000))
INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('Put your long message here.')
INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('Put your second long message here.')
INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('put your really, really LONG message (yeah, every guy says his message is the longest...whatever!')
DECLARE @cmd varchar(256)
DECLARE @LargestEventSize int
DECLARE @Width int, @Msg varchar(128)
SELECT @LargestEventSize = Max(Len(MyWords))
FROM ##MyTempTbl
SET @cmd = 'SELECT Cast(MyWords AS varchar(' +
CONVERT(varchar(5), @LargestEventSize) +
')) FROM ##MyTempTbl order by SeqNo'
SET @Width = @LargestEventSize + 1
SET @Msg = 'Here is the junk you asked about' + CHAR(13) + '----------------------------'
EXECUTE Master.dbo.xp_sendmail
'YoMama@WhoKnows.com',
@query = @cmd,
@no_header= 'TRUE',
@width = @Width,
@dbuse = 'MyDB',
@subject='none of your darn business',
@message= @Msg
DROP TABLE ##MyTempTbl
The only thing I change to make it fail is the table name, change it from ##MyTempTbl to #MyTempTbl, and it dashes the email hopes of the stored procedure upon the jagged rocks of electronic despair.
Any insight anyone? Or is BOL just full of...well..."stuff"?
Hi
Recently I have experienced the following scary scenario;
Users report a problem with an app, on diagnosis it is found that a bunch of SPs in SQL Server seem to be corrupt.
That is, when the code for them is listed, the 'Create Procedure..' line and several DECLARE lines are missing. Often the SP starts off in the middle of a variable name!!
Perhaps entries in the syscomments table have become corrupted?
Has anyone seen this problem before - is it perhaps a known bug in SQL Server 6.5?
Regards,
HI,
CREATE PROCEDURE PROC1
AS
BEGIN
SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,A.CHREMAIL,B.INTPREFERENCEID,C.CHR PREFERENCEDESC
FROM CUSTOMER A
INNER JOIN CUSTOMERPREFERENCE B
ON A.INTCUSTOMERID = B.INTCUSTOMERID
INNER JOIN TMPREFERENCE C
ON B.INTPREFERENCEID = C.INTPREFERENCEID
WHERE B.INTPREFERENCEID IN (6,7,2,3,12,10)
ORDER BY B.INTCUSTOMERID
END
IF I AM USING THIS PROC AS I/P TO ANOTHER PROC THEN IT GIVES NO PROBLEM AS I CAN USE ?
CREATE PROCEDURE PROC2
AS
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #SAATHI(INTCUSTOMERID INT,CHREMAIL NVARCHAR(60),INTPREFERENCEID INT,CHRPREFERENCEDESC NVARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO #SAATHI
EXEC PROC1
ST......1,
ST......2,
END.
BUT IF , I USE ANOTHER PROC SIMILAR TO THE FIRST ONE WHICH GIVES SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT RESULTS AND GIVES TWO SETS OF RESULTS,THEN WE HAVE A PROBLEM,HO TO SOLVE THIS :-
CREATE PROCEDURE MY_PROC
AS
BEGIN
SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,A.CHREMAIL,B.INTPREFERENCEID,C.CHR PREFERENCEDESC
FROM CUSTOMER A
INNER JOIN CUSTOMERPREFERENCE B
ON A.INTCUSTOMERID = B.INTCUSTOMERID
INNER JOIN TMPREFERENCE C
ON B.INTPREFERENCEID = C.INTPREFERENCEID
WHERE B.INTPREFERENCEID IN (23,12,10)
ORDER BY B.INTCUSTOMERID
END
SELECT A.INTCUSTOMERID,MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 23 then '1'
else '0' end) +
MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 12 then '1'
else '0' end) +
MAX(case when A.intpreferenceid = 10 then '1'
else '0' end) AS PREFER
FROM CUSTOMER
GROUP BY A.INTCUSTOMERID
ORDER BY A.INTCUSTOMERID
END
WHICH NOW GIVES ME TWO SETS OF DATA , BOTH REQUIRED THEN HOW TO USE ONE SET OF RESULTS AS I/P TO ANOTHER PROC AND OTHER SET OF RESULTS AS I/P TO YET ANOTHER PROC .
CREATE PROCEDURE PROC2
AS
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #SAATHI(INTCUSTOMERID INT,CHREMAIL NVARCHAR(60),INTPREFERENCEID INT,CHRPREFERENCEDESC NVARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO #SAATHI
EXEC MY_PROC
ST......1,
ST......2,
END.
BUT, HERE I WANT TO USE FIRST DATASET ONLY , HOW TO USE IT ?
THANKS.
I would like to capture any errors thrown by linked server in my stored procedure, How do I do this? eg: Select statement in sp to remote server fails if login credentials were changed for some reason on remote server. @@error is not able to capture this error and stored procedure is terminated when this type of error occurs.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a product that we were experiencing high recompile rates do totemp tables, we have re-written them to use table variables to reducerecompile rate. The problem I am having is that we have somecustomers still on SQL 7 where the table variables were not valid. Iwould like to have one installation script that would create thestored procedure with table variables on SQL Server 2000 and withouton SQL Server 7, I have been unsuccessful do to the limitation thatCREATE PROCEDURE statement cannot be in a script with any otherstatements.Was wondering if anyone else has run into this and found a way aroundit.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL Server 2000:
Question 1
If you drop / rename a table and then recreate the table with the SAME NAME, what impact does it have on stored procedures that use these tables? From a system perspective, do you have to rebuild / recompile ALL the stored procedures that use this table?
I had a discussion with someone that said that this is a good idea, since the IDs of the tables change in sysobjects and from a SQL SERVER query plan perspective, this needs to be done...
Question 2
If you Truncate a Table as part of a BEGIN TRANSACTION, what happens if an error occurs? Will it Rollback? The theory is that it won't because Truncate doesn't utilize the logs where as Delete From uses the SQL Logs?
Thanks!
Hi, I have a stored procedure running on our monitoring server to monitor the backup jobs on other sql servers running on our network. This sp loops thorugh the list of server names and connects remotely to other servers using linked servers. However, if one of the servers is down, the sp stops after raising 42000 error ("SQL Server does not exist") and fails to carry on processing the next server in the list.
Is there any way to capture this "SQL Server does not exist" error within the sp so that the sp can carry on with the processing?
I am using SQL Server 2000 SP4.
Thanks in advance for any replies.
Opal
I work with a large and complex reporting system with several hundred reports: the Programmability; Stored Procedures node of the object explorer has become very difficult to navigate.
Is there any metadata that can be embedded in the stored procs that would create subfolders like the existing System Stored Procedures node in this node of the object explorer?
I suspect that the correct answers are:
Rename all your queries with a rational naming convention;
Cull the deadwood;
Assign them to categories then export them to separate databases.
Unfortunately, one of these has already been done, and the other two will break several hundred dependent processes - the recoding and retesting is neither economical nor desirable.
Still, all advice is welcome. Pitch your answers at a banking geek who does intermediate to advanced stored procedures and triggers, but isn't allowed to play with sharp things (like sys objects) - but I can probably get help from a grown-up on the sysadmin team: I have discovered that the rumours about human sacrifice are baseless, and they will perform favours in return for beer.
This is also a good time to ask: just how many stored procs and functions are you allowed in SQL Server 2005?
Nile.
Could anyone describe the pitfalls and best practices with temp tables in SQL Server 2005 for me?Locking, concurrency issues etc
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi!
I have a stored proc that creates a global temp table. How can I have multiple users select records from and insert records in that table without overwriting and/or deleting data?
Thanks so much for your help!
-Parul
I have an application that I am working on that uses some small temptables. I am considering moving them to Table Variables - Would thisbe a performance enhancement?Some background information: The system I am working on has numeroustables but for this exercise there are only three that really matter.Claim, Transaction and Parties.A Claim can have 0 or more transactions.A Claim can have 1 or more parties.A Transaction can have 1 or more parties.A party can have 1 or more claim.A party can have 1 or more transactions. Parties are really many tomany back to Claim and transaction tables.I have three stored procsinsertClaiminsertTransactioninsertPartiesFrom an xml point of view the data looks like this<claim><parties><info />insertClaim takes 3 sets of paramters - All the claim levelinformation (as individual parameters), All the parties on a claim (asone xml parameter), All the transactions on a claim(As one xmlparameter with Parties as part of the xml)insertClaim calls insertParties and passes in the parties xml -insertParties returns a recordset of the newly inserted records.insertClaim then uses that table to join the claim to the parties. Itthen calls insertTransaction and passes the transaction xml into thatsproc.insertTransaciton then inserts the transactions in the xml, and alsocalls insertParties, passing in the XML snippet
View 2 Replies View RelatedLet's say that I have a stored proc that is assigned to a service broker queue and is constantly running while it waits for messages in said queue. When a message comes in on the queue, the stored proc creates a table variable based off of the contents of the message and performs various operations with the data. Since the stored proc is constantly running, do the contents of this table variable ever truly get emptied? Should I be deleting the contents of the table variable at the end of the operation to ensure that stale data doesn't persist?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've recently started a new position and our production box. Contains a procedure that uses 30 + temp tables. I'm currently not in a position to change this as it's production and I would have to be granted a window to re-design.
However the tempDb is showing some strange activity.
If a table is created #CarrierService (CarrierServiceID,DeliveryZoneID,CollectionZoneID) for example
Once the procedure is called It will appear in the tempDB with the session info appended as expected
#CarrierService________________________________________________________2C78E45A
However once the session has ended the above table will get dropped and a new one created
#2C78E45A, I now have 7000 of these different Tables in the TempDB
When I Interrogate this using
SELECT o.name, o.create_date,o.modify_date , c.Name,C.Column_Id
FROM tempdb.sys.Objects o
Inner join tempdb.Sys.Columns c
ON o.object_id =c.Object_ID
WHERE o.type ='U'
I get the Following results
name create_date modify_date object_id name
#2C78E45A26/04/2015 18:0930/04/2015 14:55746120282CarrierServiceId
#2C78E45A26/04/2015 18:0930/04/2015 14:55746120282CollectionZoneId
#2C78E45A26/04/2015 18:0930/04/2015 14:55746120282DeliveryZoneId
Notice How It's getting Modified today.
For finding size values of temp database:
select * from sys.master_files -
size column value here is 1024 for .mdf,size here for .ldf is 64
select * from tempdb.sys.database_files -
size column value here is 3576 for .mdf,size here for .ldf is 224
Why is there a difference and not the same. size columns in the above 2 tables for temp db's do they represent different values ?
1) "Deferred compile" recompile event occurs because of deferred name resolution. In other words, an object referred to in the statement does not exist at compile time. Later, when the object does exist, it requires a recompile of the statement so that it can create an optimal execution plan. One example of when a deferred compile will occur is if a temporary table is used in a batch and does not exist when the first statements in the batch are compiled.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am just learning about temp temps using Iteration, how do I clear the contents of the #temp table because when I re-run the query I get the following error:
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 6, Line 6
There is already an object named '#mytemp2' in the database.
here's an example of what I am trying to do.
--Exec Database.Employees
--Use Database
--Go
--Create PROCEDURE AEM.TempTable
--AS
--BEGIN
--Select * into #emptemp From Database.Employees
--End
--Select * From #emptemp
Is something like this possible? I can get the EXEC to run the "Select * into #emptemp From Database.Employees" statement, but when I try to use the temp table it doesnt see it.
I have a SSAS stored procedure with a signature:
public Set DoSomthing(Set toBeProcessed, Set measuresToWorkWith)The set measurseToWorkWith is passed as {[Measures].[Measure1], [Measures].[Measure2] ...}
with the measures being real or query-scoped calculated members.
To get the value of the measure for each tuple in the set toBeProcessed, I create an Expression for each tuple (measure) in the set measuresToWorkWith then for each tuple in toBeProcessed call expression.Calculate(tuple) which returns a MDXValue.
My problem is that in order to make the code generic I need to get the real (.NET) data type of the MDXValue. The class only has explicit conversion methods ToInt16() etc which implies that the data type is known at design time.
However, if one of the measures is a query-scoped calculation then it could return a .NET double, int, bool or string.
If the measure is real then I can look up its metadata. However, it appears that if it is a formula (scoped member) then are all bets are off?