I am getting this error in the installation of Sql server 2005 express.
I have windows xp service pack 2 in spanish. Net Framework 2.0 installed.
Please, What can i do?
Jose.
I am getting this error when I am installing sql server 2005 express.
My pc has net framework 2.0 installed. XP SP2.
Jose.
I am getting the following error message when I tried installing the 2005 Developer Edition from the MSDN kit. I previously installed the 2005 Express Edition, and it worked just fine, so I thought that the install failed as it was at a lower version than the Express Edition. I uninstalled the SQLExpress Edition, however, when I try to install SQL Server 2005 again, I get the following message:
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Build version check:
Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Build version check:
Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.
I have also installed Visual Studio NET, and I wonder if some component in the Studio app is holding back the SQL Server install. I have uninstalled all SQL components several times already, and I keep on getting this message.
Gregory
Gregory
I am upgrading a sql server 2000 with sp4 (I have double and triple checked the sp) on a windows 2003 sp1 server and I keep getting the following error:
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2000
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Service pack requirement check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
I cannot find anything saying that I need any other service pack other than sp4 for sql serer 2000. Any one ever run into this or have a clue what might be causing the installer to think I have the wrong service pack?
Perhaps someone here can give me a hand with this...
I have three servers running SQL Server 2000. Two are running Windows Server 2000 SP4 with SQL 2000/SP4 and one Windows Server 2003 with SQL 2000/SP?(probably not 4). I copied the installation DVD to a network drive and successfully performed an in-place upgrade of the Windows Server 2003 machine. However, when I try to upgrade either of the other servers, I get an error indicating that I have a service pack problem.
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Service pack requirement check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Of course, the error doesn't indicate what the service pack problem actually is. My SQL 2005 media was probably released before SP4 was released because the Setup Help indicates that you can directly upgrade from SP3, but makes no mention of SP4. I can't imagine there are any migration problems with it since I can't find any reference to it as a problem on any SQL Server sites... So... I'm left wondering what my problem really is... :confused:
Any help would be appreciated.
I've inherited 6 sql server 2000 boxes. I've upgrade 3 with no trouble. now I have one that gives the message :
"your upgrade is blocked because of cross-language compatibility rules.
For more information about cross-language support, see the version..."
all servers are 2003, sp2. All SQL is Enterprise edition, default language is "english". even the collation order is
the same. why the cross language message? Any help would be good else I'll be forced to rebuild the DB and load application again. ugly!!
dave
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools
Hello,
I am having a problem when trying to add the Client Components to an existing installation of SQL 2005 Standard Edition SP1 running on Windows 2003 Standard. The server was originally built with SQL 2005 Standard Edition and had SP1 installed at a later date. I am using the CD that SQL was originally installed with which is not a service packed copy of SQL. The reason given when clicking the details button is as follows:
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Build version check:
Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Steve
I have a very strange problem when I try to install SQL Express 2014 on 1 PC on my network.
The setup is blocking on the step "rules of functionnality" (I hope it is the good translation ...).
I ha ve a message that indicates that there is a problem the following checking : "It exists a Internet connection with the download center for Microsoft Framework 4.0". At the beginning I had Framework 3.5 and 4.5 installed on the PC.
When I tried to install manually Framework 4.0 I had a message that indicated that the setup was not possible because there was a Superior version. So I uninstall v4.5 and install v4.0 normally.
I run again SQL 2014 Express setup but I have always the same error. I take a look on Internet to look for the same problem but I found nothing.
Hi All,
We were upgraded our databases from 6.5 to 7.0 .After upgrading
the Compatibility level was 65 .We changed to 70 for all databases using sp_dbcmptlevel system stored proc.We were having some problems with Ansi nulls if the compatablity level is 70,We changed back to 65 that works fine--OK with ANSI NULLS.While Upgading ANSI NULLS OFF after upgrading ANSI NULLS OFF.But from the front end side ODBC settings ANSI NULLS are ON.Is that some thing to do with compatablity level or with ANSI NULLS .
If you guys have any great ideas Please let me know.
Thanks A Lot,
VJ
This may be very obvious and when I get to the first test server I will find out, but I only have a new installation of SQL2K5 so far to test with. I have several databases that need to be upgraded to run on 2K5, but the application requires them to run in 8.0 compatibility. Does this mean that an in-place upgrade is not an option?
I apologize if this is a silly question, but I have not yet found the answer specifically.
Thanks very much.
Hi All,
We have upgraded our database from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005 keeping the compatibility level 80.
Now the question is -
Would microsoft support compatibility level 80 in SQL Server 2005 even after the extended support date for SQL Server 2000?
OR
If Microsoft dropped the support for SQL 2000, then would Microsoft support compatibility level 80 in SQL Server 2005?
Thanks
We upgraded QA and production to sql server 2012 last year ( in place) leaving the user databases at sql 2005 ( 90 ). A few months ago the QA user databases were set to sql 2012 compatibility mode. Management is worried about upgrading production and wants to know if we can quickly roll back.
I want to confirm that we can roll back using the same command, and if dbcc freeproccache can be used to avoid having to update all statistics.
ALTER DATABASE <mydatabase> SET COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL = 110
ALTER DATABASE <mydatabase> SET COMPATIBILITY_LEVEL = 90
This works fine in QA on my own test user database. No errors.
Not sure if this gets fixed on a restart, but the Backward Compatibility upgrade/piece failed on service pack 1 install for SQL Server 2005. Here is the log output. Anyone experience this?
05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 ================================================================================
05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 Hotfix package launched
05/19/2006 09:00:04.368 Attempting to install instance: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install target: CLARITY
05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install file: sqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Attempting to install file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Creating MSI install log file at: C:WINDOWSHotfixRedist9LogsRedist9_Hotfix_KB913090_sqlncli.msi.log
05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller
05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Failed to read registry key: Debug
05/19/2006 09:00:51.040 MSP returned 3010: A restart is required to complete the install. This message is indicative of a success. This does not include installs where the ForceReboot action is run. This error code is not available on Windows Installer version 1.0.
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Failed to read registry key: Debug
05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Pending reboot, successfully installed file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed target: <SERVER>
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed instance: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product Status Summary:
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: SQL Server Native Client
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 SQL Server Native Client (RTM ) - Reboot Required
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: Setup Support Files
05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Setup Support Files (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Database Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Database Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Reporting Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Notification Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Notification Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Integration Services
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Integration Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150
05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Client Components
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Client Components (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: MSXML 6.0 Parser
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 MSXML 6.0 Parser (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: SQLXML4
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 SQLXML4 (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: Backward Compatibility
05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Backward Compatibility (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Product: Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer (RTM ) - Not Applied
05/19/2006 09:00:51.181
Hello
Can any one tell me the difference between Cross Join, inner join and outer join in laymans language
by just taking examples of two tables such as Customers and Customer Addresses
Thank You
hello, i've just started playing around with rules and udtis it possible to alter rule?are rules 'slower' compared to check constraint?
View 7 Replies View RelatedHello...
Is it normal in SQL Server 6.5 the user who only running the query blocking the other user who try to update/add the records?
note: The query is a complex SQL.
Many Thanks!
We are using SQL server 6.5 and currently have about 100 users connections at a given
point in time. The application is Visual Basic 5.0 based and it allows users to create
MS Word documents from the application. These documents names are stored in a table which basically
acts as a reference table. Every time a document needs to be attached to a record
this table is called with an insert/update query. This results in an exclusive page/table
lock and ends up into a blocked process. This finally results into a major halt for
all the system users.
Manual killing of these blocked processes frees up the resources and brings things back to normal
although disruptive to the users.
Any clue as to why the blocked processes are not able to free themsevles up ?
Are we missing something in our SQL configuration that will help us with unblocking
these processes ?
Hi,
Issuing 'dbcc shrinkfile (log ,truncateonly)'
I get the error message below. Books online doesn't say any more.
Can anyone explain? I am the only user connected to the db at the time, no jobs are executing.
Cannot shrink log file 2 (log) because all logical log files are in use.
(1 row(s) affected)
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
What is SPID -1? I see nothing listing it in any activity monitor, but it has just recently started blocking some processes.
Thanks,
jim craddock
I'm running a heavy SELECT query using WITH (NOLOCK). This still causes other processes trying to INSERT in one of the tables to get blocked.
I thought the locking hint would prevent from blocking other processes?
Hi all,
I have an SQL Server 2005 mirroring config with "High availability". Twice over the past four weeks, the principal server started logging to the event log:
"All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT" I checked the database activity monitor and indeed there were lots of processes in DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT.
The database was totally unresponsive to queries (all got timeouts), and no failover was done.
This are the log entries for all day:
05/04/2008 08:40:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:39:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:38:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:37:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:36:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:35:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%.
05/04/2008 08:33:49,Server,Unknown,The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 2 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
05/04/2008 03:24:02,Backup,Unknown,Log was backed up. Database: TeleCable<c/> creation date(time): 2007/08/24(13:38:00)<c/> first LSN: 205089:18926:1<c/> last LSN: 209688:18463:1<c/> number of dump devices: 1<c/> device information: (FILE=1<c/> TYPE=DISK: {'\face01f$logbackup'}). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
05/04/2008 00:00:14,spid24s,Unknown,This instance of SQL Server has been using a process ID of 1700 since 4/9/2008 3:18:54 AM (local) 4/9/2008 1:18:54 AM (UTC). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
After that, the same entry once per minute.
I restarted the database and everything came to normal.
As you can imagine, the problem is really serious.
Should I forget about mirroring? Anyone has experienced something similar?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Please forgive my ignorance, however I am 2 months new to SQL-Server 2000.
Is there a way to create a rule specific to a user such that he can only SELECT from a table where a field equals a specific value.
In other words user Joe types in: SELECT * FROM SALES_BY_LOCATION. Because Joe's territory is Los Angeles, I want a rule that only retrieves sales data from Los Angeles.
In My table i'm collecting information about our customers.In that i have fields zip and phone.So i wanted to implemement a rule that zip should be atlaest of of 5 characters and phone should be 13 characters Including '-'s(333-333-3333).How can i implement these two rules on my table.
View 9 Replies View RelatedNot long ago I accountered this situation: I had two databases on "MS SQL Server". In one of the databases there was a nomenclature with very large primary key.
I had to transport that nomenclature and transform the wide PK into single identity column into the other database.
I decided to use a function for that transformation. BUT that function had to mark somewhere which combination of the PK columns is relative to which identity value. BUT functions CAN'T WRITE under MSSQL.
So I took the challenge and mine all sources of information. The result was a function "Exec4Fun" that breaks the rule.
I suppose that with this function it's possible to avoid the restriction for triggers, which prevents writing in the triggering table? (not tested yet)
If someone needs such tools, just write back your e-mail and I'll send some code.
All the best and have fun :)
Hi experts,
What is the difference between, Creating rules and creating checks on a field?
They both look the same.
Regards
sachin
Don't sit back because of failure. It will come back to check if you still available. -- Binu
When i use the MS association rules ,i don't know how it is worked on the background .I stuy the Fp-Growth algorithm , but there're some questions , I don't kown what's the meaning of transcation database. who can give me one example ? thanks .I know we can store the data in relation database,but in basket Analysis ,how a transaction stroed in relation database?
View 3 Replies View Related1) I use the identifier of transaction and attribute in one table.
Do I can to build a association rules structure without the use of the nested tables?
I tried - did not turn out...
2) As it is necessary to use a main and child table, can not build a prediction query.
When I try to add the predict column in a criteria/argument (Field=PredictSupport), i'll given message:
"Nested table column cannot be used as an argument in a data mining function."
I can not use other columns, because they are not predicable.
In my package i have column called "optinout" coming from source file which has the value "start" and "stop", now in my destination table i have a column called "contact permission code" to which i need to apply a business rule based on the value in column "optinout" the rule is as stated "Contact Permission Code" is OptOut if "OptInOut" value is "STOP" else OptIn.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi guys,
I have a stored procedure which generates the next sequence number...
it uses SERIALIZABLE Option. procs look something like below..
begin
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION
Sequence generating statement...
COMMIT TRANSACTION
set @NextSequenceValue = @NextSequenceValue
Return @NextSequenceValue
end
For some reason when i call the proc with below parameters to get next sequence number.. its hungs up..
declare @NextSequenceValue int
set @NextSequenceValue = 0
exec spGetNextSequence 19, 'LotSequence', @NextSequenceValue output, Null
select @NextSequenceValue as NextSequenceValue
When i queried sp_who2 it shows that my processid is blocked by some other processid.. and when i do DBCC INPUTBUFFER (blockingprocessid), the query of blocking processid and my nextsequence generation stored proc is not realted at all..
Can you help shed some light on why my nextsequence generating proc is getting hunged...?
help is appericated..
If I kill a blocked process, why does the current activity window still show the process? Both processes, blocking and blocked, are scheduled tasks. Also, the blocked process is still listed as a running task in the manage scheduled task window.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe following is an extract from sp_who2
SPID Status Login HostName BlkBy DBName Command CPUTime DiskIO
----- ---------- ------- -------- ----- ------- ------- ------- ------
162 sleeping om18682 . -1 STIPROD SELECT 236 120
Has anybody experienced a process being blocked by SPID -1.
Hi,
I have a fairly complex application running which has numerous connections on various threads accessing my sql 2005 database.
Every now and then I find that one of my connections is being blocked by process with a pid of -2.
I assume this is some system process.
The only way I can get my application going again is to restart the sql server.
Can someone tell me what process -2 is?
cheers,
Robert
HiShortly, I keep invoices in a table.Occasionally, someone will fire the execution of a stored procedure(SP) that performs several UPDATEs against (potentially) all invoicesOLDER than a date that is supplied to the SP as a parameter.The SP is usually a lengthy process (it takes at least 30 mins).The problem is that SQL server 2000 Dev Edition doesn't allow me toinsert new invoices that are "younger", while the SP is executing.How should I specify to SQL Server that new invoices are "harmless"?Thanks.
View 8 Replies View Related