Thank you very much for your reply. I have one more question about collation. In my production server we have SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and on other server (from where i want to move database to prod server) the collation is Latin1_General_CI_AI . can i move the database form one server to another even if they have different collation. The both servers are sql server 2005 and the production server is standard edition and the other server is developer edition. I wanted to move the databases from developer edition. Could some body help me with this. Thank you very much.
I've restored a SQL Server 2000 database with a Latin1_General_BIN collation from a .dmp file to a SQL Server 2005 server with a default collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. When I try to change the database collation I get hundreds of the following error:
The object 'CK_PM10200_GLPOSTD_00AF8CF' is dependent on database collation. So, in this case, is it even possible to change the collation if there are objects in the database that are dependent on it?
I have a DB which has its collation set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and i need to change it to Latin1_General_CI_AS,
does anyone have any idea how to do this?
i have tried right clicking on the DB and changing its collation in the options tab, but this only changes what the default is, so all the old columns still have the old collatin,
Dear Members.. I am facing a problem with SQL server 2005 Secc. I have a Server with server collation Arabic_CI_AS. And i have a databse in it which has a collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1256_CI_AS. The issue started with me when i am trying to create a Integrated seccuroty for some users in my firm. I have created a DatabaseRoll for in the database. There is no problem while creating it. I have added the user in the seccurity login on the server and then i added these users in the database Seccurity users. After that i applied the created roll to that users. It being created perfectly. But the issue is coming when i want to modify the seccurity policy (Seccurables) of any user from the database. (Properties of Users --> Seccurables ) Its showing an error. as follows
------------------------------ Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.SmoEnum) ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: urn could not be resolved at level DatabaseRole. ------------------------------
I am not understanding why its coming with this situation. ========================================================== Also sometimes its showing an error when i am trying to see the login prperties of that user in the database logins. Server--> Seccurity --> Logins --> Properties --> Seccurables -->Err. As follows ------------------------------------------ Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.SmoEnum) ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.ConnectionInfo) ------------------------------ Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468) ------------------------------ Hope some body can help me in this.... Thanks in Advance....
we have a problem with the collation of databases between sql server 7.0 and SQL SERVER 2005. The message that pops up is next:
"Mensagge. 468, level 16, state 9, Line 1 Problem of collation can not be solved between "Compatibility_52_c0a_30001" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS of UNION command.
Te script is lanch from sqlserver 2005, and it doesn´t work with UNION command but it works if you lanch them separately.
A few collation questions on SQL Server 2005 SP2, which I'll call SQLS.The default collation for SQLS is apparently SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS.I wish to use a variation of this, SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AIcollation, but there is no such collation returned fromfn_helpcollations(). Also, if I try to use this collation ina CREATE DATABASE stmt, SQLS yells about it.I see that there is a Latin1_General_CS_AI. What effects are therein using this collation? The SQL_* collations are SQL collations,while non-SQL_* collations are Windows collations, yes? SQLS runsonly on Windows, so am I safe in using Latin1_General_CS_AI? Whatdoes the CP1 in the SQL collation signify? Am I asking for trouble?------------------------------------Assuming that I set Latin1_General_CS_AI (or any other case-sensitivecollation) at the database level, I believe my DDL/DML for that databasealso becomes case-sensitive. How can I specify that I want ONLY my dataaccess to be case-sensitive, and not my DDL/DML? I don't want to haveto remember to type "select * from MyCamelCase" when "mycamelcase"should work.Any help appreciated.A new SQLS DBA..aj
Our production sql 2000 systems have collation setting as "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS". The new production db server[sql 2005] has been installed and configured with "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" collation.
The issue is with the dev est servers. A few of them has been configured with collation "Latin1_General_CI_AS". Recently I have noticed a string comparison failed with collation related message due to the serverdb collation difference.
I have not come across any specific collation recommendation from Microsoft. Are there any specific recommendations from Msft on collation? I can forsee issues, if we have to perform any testsany feautre development on a production copy in dev est environments which involves string comparisons.
This issue is more important since we are on a Migration path which involves large some number of servers in dev est environments. My recommendation to the team at our place was to rebuild the already configured servers which has "Latin1_General_CI_AS" collation and change the server collation to "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS".
I would really appreciate if you could share your thoughts on this issue.
Our production sql 2000 systems have collation setting as "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS". The new production db server[sql 2005] has been installed and configured with "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" collation.
The issue is with the dev est servers. A few of them has been configured with collation "Latin1_General_CI_AS". Recently I have noticed a string comparison failed with collation related message due to the serverdb collation difference.
I have not come across any specific collation recommendation from Microsoft. Are there any specific recommendations from Msft on collation? I can forsee issues, if we have to perform any testsany feautre development on a production copy in dev est environments which involves string comparisons.
This issue is more important since we are on a Migration path which involves large some number of servers in dev est environments. My recommendation to the team at our place was to rebuild the already configured servers which has "Latin1_General_CI_AS" collation and change the server collation to "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS".
I would really appreciate if you could share your thoughts on this issue.
Hi, I'm installing SQL Server 2005 on windows 2003 R2. Which Collation Designator is to be used so that the both English as well as Arabic characters can be stored simultaneously...? That is "The collation settings designator which support both Arabic as well as English character set"...
Scenario Recently moved a SQL2000 database to SQL2005. Collation on SQL 2000 database server was SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS Colaltion on SQL 2005 database server is Latin1_General_CI_AS
After restoring the SQL 2000 database on SQL 2005 we observed that the database collation was SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. We have altered the database collation to Latin1_General_CI_AS. We understand this will work for all new objects created on the database but existing objects (prior to the collation change) will continue to have the 'SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS' collation.
What is the best method to change the collation of the older columns to 'Latin1_General_CI_AS' - 1) Run ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN <colname> <datatype> COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS <nullability> on each varchar/char column
or
2) For each table BCP out data DROP TABLE RECREATE TABLE (taking the new collation Latin1_General_CI_AS) BCP in data
We want to install 2 applications that run on SQL server 2005 but the requirement of database installation are different Collation setting ( One require Dictionary order, case-insensitive, for use with 1252 Character Set and other require Dictionary order, case-sensitive, for use with the 437 (US English) Character set). So the question here could I install both two applications successfully on same platform ? and if yes how?
I need a SQL Server 2005 SP2 instance with a collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN2. After installing SP2, the collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN, and none of the patches I can find seem to want to work (they are all apparently written for SQL Server 2000).
I have just upgraded to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000.In Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, when I click on databaseproperties, I receive the following error:-Cannot resolve the collation conflict between"Latin1_General_CI_AS"and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468)Some reference suggest that I can change the database collation byclicking database properties!What can I do?
I am using SQL Server 2008. In ServerProperty function, there are two properties called “Collation” and “CollationID”. In some cases, I will only know the CollationID. Is it possible get the collation name from the CollationID? Is there a function called CollationNameFromID?
I am installing SQL 2005 on a cluster for the first time. All our other servers (SQL 2000) are set at collation:SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS I am installing SharePoint on a cluster and it needs to be: Case Insensitive, Accent Sensitive, Kana Sensitive and Width Sensitive I can't figure out which collation setting to choose? Can anyone help me out, please? Thanks in advance for your help /P
Does anyone know if there is a command in query analizer for sql server 2005 (Express) that changes the collation of all the char (varchar, nvarchar etc) in a table or in a database. And I don't mean to set the collation when creating a database, but to modify a database's collation seting.
when I install SQL Server it uses a SQL collation (SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS), and i created a form haveing Arabic field names and every thing saved on my DB, when i call this field in my html page its look fine and visitor can read it , the problem when the clintes (visitors) fill this form and submit it, I can't read the information enterd in the text fields its shown like this (???????).
I'm in the process of migrating an existing sql server 2000 that currently has the following collation set / sort order : SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_CS_AS.
I would like to know what the corresponding collation set / sort order is for SQL Server 2005. Looking at the option when installing there doesn't seem to be an option for 850 multilingual and case sensitive and accent sensitive. This is when selecting SQL Collations 9used for compatability with previous version of SQL Server).
If I were to select Latin1_General and check the Case sensitive and Accent sensitive would this give me the desired results ?
Hi. Wondered if I might get a bit of advice on a minor collation problem I've experienced after migrating a database form SQL Server 2000 to 2005?
Users reported an error appearing in pages in a web-based application and I traced the problem to a stored procedure that was using a temporary table. I retained the original collation - SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS - after migration and the error showing up was 'Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.' This makes sense as I guess temporary tables are assuming tempdb's collation. Resolution in this case was fairly simple, which was to apply an explicit collation to one of the columns in the temporary table (it only had three columns, only one requiring the collation). However the longer-term question is should I: (a) resolve similar issues in the same way as and when they arise; (b) change the collation of the migrated database to that of the default for system and new databases under 2005 - i.e. Latin1_General_CI_AS; or (b) change the collation of tempdb and the other system databases to match that of the migrated databases (sounds risky)?
I would probably go for (a) or perhaps (b) but could use some expert advise on the matter.
I had an SQL 2000 database with Turkish collation. (Note: Default database collation was Latin)
Today i transfered data from that to SQL 2005 with Latin collation.
There is no problem with old data. I transfered them correctly. But when i insert/update at new database, Turkish characters change to Latin. (Like i->i, g->g)
When i put an N before the value, it works.
For example INSERT INTO T1 (A) VALUES (N'A')
Must i put N to all of them? I think not. What can be the solution?
Is it possible to restore a SQL 2000 backup with Binary Order collation to a new SQL 2005 installation with Dictionary order, case-insensitive. Is this something I can do during the restore process or would I need to change it after?
I (absolute beginner) configured a distribution on a publisher wich acts as its own distributor. I did it by right click on replication "configure distribution", followed all instructions and chose all default values. Nothing more. But now I want to view the distributor properties and following message appears:
SQL Server is unable to complete the Distributor Properties.
ZUSÄTZLICHE INFORMATIONEN:
Ausnahme beim Ausführen einer Transact-SQL-Anweisung oder eines Transact-SQL-Batches. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. (Microsoft SQL Server, Fehler: 468)
My collegue has no problems viewing these properties. We have both XP and SQLServer 2005 SP1. What is the reason for this error message? And how can I solve it?
Complete: SetPackageInstallStateAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned true Running: DeterminePackageTransformsAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 Complete: DeterminePackageTransformsAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned true Running: ValidateSetupPropertiesAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 Complete: ValidateSetupPropertiesAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned true Running: OpenPipeAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 Complete: OpenPipeAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned false Error: Action "OpenPipeAction" failed during execution. Running: CreatePipeAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 Complete: CreatePipeAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned true Running: RunRemoteSetupAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 <Func Name='CProcessCtrl::GetInstallPath'> <EndFunc Name='CProcessCtrl::GetInstallPath' Return='0' GetLastError='0'> Error: 0x80070050 TaskScheduler::NewWorkItem for SQL Server Remote Setup Error: 0x80070005 TaskSchedulerWorkItem failed to save the task [SQL Server Remote Setup ] Complete: RunRemoteSetupAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned false Error: Action "RunRemoteSetupAction" failed during execution. Error information reported during run: Attempting to determine log files for remote install. Connection to remote computer's scheduler service. Creating new workitem. Deleting existing work item and trying again... Starting remote setup onSQL1N2 Error: 80070005 Access is denied. Running: PopulateMutatorDbAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 Complete: PopulateMutatorDbAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43, returned true Running: GenerateRequestsAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:43 SQL_Engine = 3 SQL_Data_Files = -1 SQL_Replication = -1 SQL_FullText = -1 SQL_SharedTools = -1 SQL_BC_DEP = -1 Analysis_Server = -1 AnalysisDataFiles = -1 AnalysisSharedTools = -1 RS_Server = -1 RS_Web_Interface = -1 RS_SharedTools = -1 Notification_Services = -1 NS_Engine = -1 NS_Client = -1 SQL_DTS = -1 Client_Components = -1 Connectivity = -1 SQL_Tools90 = -1 SQL_WarehouseDevWorkbench = -1 SDK = -1 SQLXML = -1 Tools_Legacy = -1 TOOLS_BC_DEP = -1 SQL_SSMSEE = -1 SQL_Documentation = -1 SQL_BooksOnline = -1 SQL_DatabaseSamples = -1 SQL_AdventureWorksSamples = -1 SQL_AdventureWorksDWSamples = -1 SQL_AdventureWorksASSamples = -1 SQL_Samples = -1 Complete: GenerateRequestsAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:44, returned true Running: CreateProgressWindowAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:44 Complete: CreateProgressWindowAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:44, returned false Error: Action "CreateProgressWindowAction" failed during execution. Running: ScheduleActionAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:44 Complete: ScheduleActionAction at: 2007/9/23 7:33:45, returned true Skipped: InstallASAction.11 Waiting for actions from remote setup(s) Breaking wait state and aborting package due to cancel code received: 1602 Remote setup(s) are ready Notify package action is determined: 1602 Error Code: 0x800700e9 (233) Windows Error Text: No process is on the other end of the pipe.
Source File Name: remotemessageliboverlappedpipelistener.cpp Compiler Timestamp: Sat Oct 7 09:43:54 2006 Function Name: sqls:verlappedPipeListener::writePipe Source Line Number: 294
Notification failed to send. ---- Context ----------------------------------------------- sqls::HostSetupPackageInstallerSynch::installAction
Removing machine from list of targets to sync. Skipped: Action "InstallASAction.11" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlsupport", referred by package: "as", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallASAction.18 Skipped: Action "InstallASAction.18" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "owc11", referred by package: "as", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallASAction.22 Skipped: Action "InstallASAction.22" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "bcRedist", referred by package: "as", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallASAction.9 Skipped: Action "InstallASAction.9" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "msxml6", referred by package: "as", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction.11 Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction.11" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlsupport", referred by package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction.12 Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction.12" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlncli", referred by package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction.18 Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction.18" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "owc11", referred by package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction.22 Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction.22" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "bcRedist", referred by package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallDTSAction.9 Skipped: Action "InstallDTSAction.9" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "msxml6", referred by package: "dts", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction.11 Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction.11" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlsupport", referred by package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction.12 Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction.12" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlncli", referred by package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction.18 Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction.18" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "owc11", referred by package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction.22 Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction.22" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "bcRedist", referred by package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallNSAction.9 Skipped: Action "InstallNSAction.9" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "msxml6", referred by package: "ns", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallRSAction.11 Skipped: Action "InstallRSAction.11" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "sqlsupport", referred by package: "rs", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallRSAction.18 Skipped: Action "InstallRSAction.18" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "owc11", referred by package: "rs", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallRSAction.22 Skipped: Action "InstallRSAction.22" was not run. Information reported during analysis: All installs have been cancelled, so package: "bcRedist", referred by package: "rs", will not be installed. Skipped: InstallSqlAction Clustered feature detected: SQL_Engine Clustered feature detected: SQL_FullText Loaded DLL:C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup Bootstrapsqlsval.dll Version:2005.90.3042.0 Windows Error Text: User cancelled installation.
Source File Name: sqlchainingsqlchainingactions.cpp Compiler Timestamp: Thu Nov 16 20:32:00 2006 Function Name: sqls::ReportChainingResults:erform Source Line Number: 3667
---- Context ----------------------------------------------- sqls::RunRemoteSetupAction::waitForRemoteSetupComplete king package: "patchRS2000" as failed due to cancel code received from cancel source: 1602 sqls Delay load of action "UploadDrWatsonLogAction" returned nothing. No action will occur as a result. Message pump returning: 1602
We are consolidating some old SQL server-environments from 'OLD' to 'NEW' and one of our vendors is protesting on behalve of the collation we use on our 'NEW' SQL server.
Our old server (SQL 2005) contains databases with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
Our new server (2014) has the standard collation Latin1_General_CI_AS
Both collations have CI and AS
From experience I know different databases can reside next to eachother on the same Instance.
The only problem could be ('could be !!') the use of TempDB with a high volume of transaction to be executured in TempDB and choosing for Snapshot Isolation Level ....
The application the databases belong to is very static, hardly updated, and questioned only several time per hour (so no TempDB issue I guess).
using different databases using a different collation running on the same instance?
I need to change the default collation of all dbs on all my servers to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI from SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. We need to do compares and sorts and want to ignore accents -- something that wasn't clear when we built the servers. I know this has to do with "re-building databases" -- maybe even including the master -- but I'm not certain exactly what this means. Thanks!
