Begin Tran In An Sp Executed Fom Within A Transaction Scope
Jan 28, 2008
we have an update sp that must call an insert sp after the update. The update and insert must act like a transaction, ie all or none.
We believe that wrapping most of the update (including call to insert sp) sp in a begin tran block would guarantee the all or none behavior.
However, we're not sure what would happen if one of our developers calls the update sp from within a transaction scope that expects yet something additional to be included in the transaction. Would the begin tran block (assuming no errors in that block) in the sp commit both the update and insert regardless of what happens in the rest of the .net tran scope?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 15, 2008
Hello, I've a problem with a software developed in C# with the framework 2.0. This is the error I receive : The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" was unable to begin a distributed transaction. OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" returned message "No transaction is active.". If I try directly to restart the process, it works fine. Is there someone who can help me ? This is the process 1. In C# --> Call of a Query : select from the linked server (db in sql 2005) and insert into a table SQL 2005 2. In the C# --> using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()) and insert in a table in SQL 2005 which is link server Thank in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2007
I am running an Execute SQL task that does a Begin Tran, then the next task in the sequence is a data task which imports a XML file into two tables. If i doo a Rollback Tran only one of the two tables is rolled back.
Is it possible to have both tables rolled back from one Begin tran command or do i need to split the datatasl into two and treat each import as a seperate issue ?
The connection is set to retainsameconnection
thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
Hi,
I want to rollback my t-sql if it encounters an error. I wrote this code:
begin tran mytrans;
insert into table1 values (1, 'test');
insert into table1 values (1, 'jsaureouwrolsjflseorwurw'); -- it will encounter error here since max value to be inputted is 10
commit tran mytrans;
I forced my insert to have an error by putting a value that exceeds the data size. However, I didn't do any rollback. Anything i missed out?
cherriesh
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2006
Hallo All,
Can somebody explain why the same function works different with MS SQL 2000 and MS SQL 2005?
On both systems 2000 and 2005 I have 2x databases named ACCT and PROD (actually only a test environment).
On both systems I try to execute the following statements:
BEGIN TRAN TRAN_01 WITH MARK 'My TRAN_01'
USE PROD
INSERT INTO [PROD].[dbo].[_PROT]([STR_COMMENT], [R_NUM_T1], [R_NUM_T2])
VALUES('PROT_COMMENT', 1004, 1004)
USE ACCT
INSERT INTO [ACCT].[dbo].[_PROT]([STR_COMMENT], [R_NUM_T1], [R_NUM_T2])
VALUES('PROT_COMMENT', 1004, 1004)
COMMIT TRAN TRAN_01
After executing the statements I start the following query:
SELECT * FROM [msdb].[dbo].[logmarkhistory]
On MS SQL 2000 I get as results:
PROD TRAN_01 My TRAN_01 SUPPORTAdministrator 3944000000107600001 2006-03-29 17:15:13.930
ACCT TRAN_01 My TRAN_01 SUPPORTAdministrator 8000000009200001 2006-03-29 17:15:13.930
Seems to be correct. I think it is the way it should work according to the documentation.
On MS SQL 2005 I only get the following results:
PROD TRAN_01 My TRAN_01 SU 29000000107800001 2006-03-29 17:31:32.283
There are no entries in the table for the ACCT database and the account / user_name is shown incorrectly.
It seems to be an ERROR in the processing of such marked transactions in MS SQL 2005.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2015
Should BEGIN TRAN ...COMMIT be used in a procedure body if I have only select statements??
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[procname]
@param1int
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRY
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
hello, I have a big problem with a script.. some instructions seems to be not executed. I don't understand. If I execute line perline it's ok - but the entire block no.
Explain me and find the solution:
IF NOT EXISTS ( SELECT *
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ACS_ACL'
AND COLUMN_NAME = 'ZoneUId' )
BEGIN
ALTER TABLE dbo.ACS_ACL ADD ZoneUId T_UID;
UPDATE dbo.ACS_ACL SET ZoneUId = '1' WHERE ZoneUId IS NULL;
print 'end of script'
END
result:
Msg 207, Level 16, State 1, Line 9
Invalid column name 'ZoneUId'.
the error is on line:
UPDATE dbo.ACS_ACL SET ZoneUId = '000000001' WHERE ZoneUId IS NULL;
how is is possible because the preceding line is
ALTER TABLE dbo.ACS_ACL ADD ZoneUId T_UID;
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2007
I was just debugging a stored procedure visual studio and I was surprised with what I was watching.
I'm running SQL 2005 and visual studio 2005. I have a set of nested try/catch blocks.
It fails on the first try and drops into the catch block just as it should. Within the catch block a dynamic sql statement is created. A try block begins and attempts to exec(@sql). It then drops to the catch block. However, I copy the statement into SQL Management Studio and it runs without error everytime.
Why is it dropping into the catch block? Logically it should just complete executing the statement continue without going into the catch block.
Do I have to reset the raiserror values between try blocks or something?
--Thanks--
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi have have two linked SQL Servers and I am trying to get things workingsmootly/quickly.Should I be using 'BEGIN TRANSACTION' or 'BEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTION' ?Basicly, these SPs update a local table and a remote table in the sametransaction. I cant have one table updated and not the other. Please dontsay replicate the tables either as at this time, this is is not an option.I have for example a number of stored procedures that are based around thefollowing:where ACSMSM is a remote (linked) SQL Server.procedure [psm].ams_Update_VFE@strResult varchar(8) = 'Failure' output,@strErrorDesc varchar(512) = 'SP Not Executed' output,@strVFEID varchar(16),@strDescription varchar(64),@strVFEVirtualRoot varchar(255),@strVFEPhysicalRoot varchar(255),@strAuditPath varchar(255),@strDefaultBranding varchar(16),@strIPAddress varchar(23)asdeclare @strStep varchar(32)declare @trancount intSet XACT_ABORT ONset @trancount = @@trancountset @strStep = 'Start of Stored Proc'if (@trancount = 0)BEGIN TRANSACTION mytranelsesave tran mytran/* start insert sp code here */set @strStep = 'Write VFE to MSM'updateACSMSM.msmprim.msm.VFECONFIGsetDESCRIPTION = @strDescription,VFEVIRTUALROOT = @strVFEVirtualRoot,VFEPHYSICALROOT = @strVFEPhysicalRoot,AUDITPATH = @strAuditPath,DEFAULTBRANDING = @strDefaultBranding,IPADDRESS = @strIPAddresswhereVFEID = @strVFEID;set @strStep = 'Write VFE to PSM'updateACSPSM.psmprim.psm.VFECONFIGsetDESCRIPTION = @strDescription,VFEVIRTUALROOT = @strVFEVirtualRoot,VFEPHYSICALROOT = @strVFEPhysicalRoot,AUDITPATH = @strAuditPath,DEFAULTBRANDING = @strDefaultBranding,IPADDRESS = @strIPAddresswhereVFEID = @strVFEID/* end insert sp code here */if (@@error <> 0)beginrollback tran mytranset @strResult = 'Failure'set @strErrorDesc = 'Fail @ Step :' + @strStep + ' Error : ' + @@Errorreturn -1969endelsebeginset @strResult = 'Success'set @strErrorDesc = ''end-- commit tran if we started itif (@trancount = 0)commit tranreturn 0
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2006
I'm receiving the below error when trying to implement Execute SQL Task.
"The ROLLBACK TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." This error also happens on COMMIT as well and there is a preceding Execute SQL Task with BEGIN TRANSACTION tranname WITH MARK 'tran'
I know I can change the transaction option property from "supported" to "required" however I want to mark the transaction. I was copying the way Import/Export Wizard does it however I'm unable to figure out why it works and why mine doesn't work.
Anyone know of the reason?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2007
Hi
How do I make use of begin transaction and commit transaction in SSIS.
As am not able to commit changes due to certain update commands I want to explicitly write begin and commit statements. but when i make use of begin and commit in OLEDB commnad stage it throws an error as follows:
Hresult:0x80004005
descriptionyntax error or access violation.
its definately not an syntax error as i executed it in sql server. also when i use it in execute sql task out side the dataflow container it doesnt throw any error but still this task doesnt serve my purpose of saving/ commiting update chanages in the database.
Thanks,
Prashant
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2006
Hi,
I am having some problem with SSIS transaction. Eventhought I tried to imitate the concept that Jamie presented at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/jthomson/transactionsinsqlserver2005integrationservices.asp
. My workflow is as followed
*********************************
For Each ADO.Record in Oracle (transaction=not supported)
If (Certain_Field_Value = 'A')
Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle (transaction=not supported)
DO Sequence A (Start a Transaction , transaction=required)
INSERT/UPDATE some records in SQLDB(transaction=supported)
Finish Sequence A ( transaction should stop here)
UPDATE Oracle DB ( Execute SQLTask, transaction=not supported)
If (Certain_Field_Value = 'B')
Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle (transaction=not supported)
DO Sequence B (Start a Transaction , transaction = required)
INSERT/UPDATE some records in SQLDB (transaction=supported)
Finish Sequence A ( transaction should stop here)
UPDATE Oracle DB ( Execute SQLTask, transaction=not supported)
If (Certain_Field_Value = 'C')
------------
------------
End ForEach Loop
*************************************
My requirements are that I want separate transaction for each Sequence A, B, C, etc... If Sequence A transaction fails, the other should still be continuing with another transaction.
But I am getting an error regarding the OLEDB Error in next Task (e.g in Certain_Field_Value = 'B') "Lookup Data in SQL DB with values from Oracle ", the error message is ".......Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction. ".
What is it that I am doing wrong?
Regards
KyawAM
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2000
I am executing a stored procedure something like this
Create Procedure TEST
@test1
@test2
AS
BeGIN TRANSACTION ONE
SELECT...
UPDATE..
....
....
....
TRUNCATE
etc and lot of Select,update and delete statements like this
.....
COMMIT TRANSACTION ONE
The Block of code which I have b/w BEGIN TRANSACTION AND COMMIT TRANSACTION ..Will it be rolled back
if it encounters any errors in the SELECT,UPPDATE,DELETE ..statements which I have with the transaction one.
IF not How do I roll back if it encounters any erros b/w the BEGIN TRANSACTION and END TRANSACTION.
Thanks
micky
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2007
I had thought that if any statement failed within a BEING TRANS .. COMMIT TRANS block, then all the statements would be rolled back. But I am seeing different behavior (SQL Server 2000 8.00.2039)
For instance, run these statements to set up a test:
--DROP TABLE testTable1
--DROP TABLE testTable2
CREATE TABLE testTable1 (f1 varchar(1))
CREATE TABLE testTable2 (f1 varchar(1))
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_tmptmp ON testTable1 (f1)
insert into testTable1(f1) values ('a')
So table testTable1 has a unique index on it..
Now try to run these statements:
--DELETE FROM testTable2
BEGIN TRANSACTION
insert into testTable1(f1) values ('a')
insert into testTable2(f1) values ('a')
COMMIT TRANSACTION
SELECT * FROM testTable2
..the first insert fails on the unique index.. but the second insert succeeds. Shouldn't the second insert roll back? How can I make two operations atomic?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
HelloI am trying to run a program to check for transaction scopeI have written the following code.But it seems I need to add a namespace or referenceWhat namespace am I supposed to addthanksusing (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScope.Required, options)){SqlConnection MyCon = new SqlConnection("server=hemalatha\sqlexpress;integrated security=sspi;database=demo");MyCon.Open();SqlCommand Mycmd=new SqlCommand("insert into t1 values 574,'scope','10/10/2007',3,3,3");Mycmd.ExecuteNonQuery();SqlConnection MyCon1 = new SqlConnection("server=hemalatha\sqlexpress;integrated security=sspi;database=persons");MyCon1.Open();SqlCommand Mycmd1 = new SqlCommand("insert into persons values 'scope',123,123,12,'scope'");Mycmd1.ExecuteNonQuery();}
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2006
Hi All,Can any one help by giving me the details/difference in using the Transaction Isolation Levels (read uncommitted, read committed, repeatable read, or serializable)in asp.net. I just want to know in which case we can use these things in begining a transaction, and will it improve the performance. thanks in advance Boo
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
I need to copy two large tables from one database into another, via the internet. I haven't worked out exactly how yet, but the first issue which has occurred to me is that by the time the first table has been exported (via a SELECT clause?) into a suitable file, the second table (to which it is related) will be out of sync. So, how do I ensure that I end up with a snapshot of the two tables, perfectly in sync with each other? I know that BEGIN/END TRANSACTION makes sure that UPDATES to tables remain in sync, but will it work just for SELECT statements?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2007
Could someone tell me if this is the correct way to begin and commit a transaction:
CREATE procedure AddTitle
@title varchar(255),
@descriptions varchar(255),
@mediaId int,
@quantityowned int,
@classificationid int
AS
BEGIN Tran TranStart
Set NOCOUNT ON
declare @titleid int --declaring the titleid
INSERT INTO Titles(title, [descriptions])
values(@title,
@descriptions)
set @titleid = SCOPE_IDENTITY() --grabbing the id to be placed in the other table
INSERT INTO Resources(titleid,mediaid,quantityowned)
values(@titleid,
@mediaid,
@quantityowned)
insert into titleclassification(titleid, classificationid)
values(@titleid, @classificationid)
select @titleid as titleid -- return to caller if needed
Commit Tran Transtart
GO
Where would I put rollback transaction? Do I need it?
Thanks!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2007
Hi ,
I have 2 packages and they get executed in SQL Job.
Each of these package will have seperate transactions with the Database and I am not sure of how to maintain the transactions between these 2 packages.
Can someone explain me the necessary setting to achieve this. If I set the TransactionOption property to Required (or) Supported in both these packages, will the Transaction Scope of the first package extend to the second one.
For me, If the second package ends up in error, the first package should also have to be rollbacked.
Any suggestions would be of great help.
Thanks
Evan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2007
I want to know if it's a good practice to use sql-transaction in both c# and sql procedures code.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2006
I notice you can do a END and BEGIN trasaction in BOTH. But I hope BOTH are not needed. So where so I use them ?
Or should I even use them for simple updates and inserts ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Greetings,I've been reading with interest the threads here on deadlocking, as I'mfinding my formerly happy app in a production environment suddenlydeadlocking left and right. It started around the time I decided towrap a series of UPDATE commands with BEGIN/END.The gist of it is I have a .NET app that can do some heavy reading (nowriting) from tblWOS. It can take a minute or so to read all the datainto the app, along with data from other tables.I also have a web app out on the floor where people can entertransactions which updates perhaps 5-20 records in tblWOS at a time.The issue comes when someone is loading data with the app, and someoneelse tries an update through the web app: deadlocks-ville on theapplication and/or the web app.Again, I believe it began around the time I wrapped those 5-20 recordupdates to tblWOS on the web app with BEGIN/END. The funny thing isthat the records involved are not the same ones, so I'm thinking somekind of table-level lock is going on.I've played with UPDLOCK in examples, but don't quite understand whatit's attempting to do. Since the web update is discrete and short, andit is NOT updating records that are getting loaded, I'd like theBEGIN/UPDATE/END web transaction to happen and not deadlock the loadingapplication.Any suggestions? I'd be most grateful.thanks, Leaf
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
Can help me?
I have to insert BEGIN and COMMIT Transaction in my stored procedure (call to a trigger)
Code Snippet
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[DETTAGLIO_TURNI_DIFENSORI]
(
@tipo_albo VARCHAR(50),
@data_inizio DATETIME,
@data_fine DATETIME,
@descrizione VARCHAR(50),
@idturno INT,
@n_dif INT
)
AS
-- DICHIARAZIONE VARIABILI...
DECLARE @dett_idturno as INT
DECLARE @totale_giorni as INT
DECLARE @tipo_albo_A as VARCHAR(9)
DECLARE @tipo_albo_B as VARCHAR(9)
DECLARE @data_odierna as DATETIME
DECLARE @tot_avvocati as INT
DECLARE @avv_giorno as INT
DECLARE @avv_giornoA as INT
DECLARE @avv_giornoB as INT
DECLARE @conta_giorni as INT
DECLARE @incremento_giorni as INT
DECLARE @incr_dif_giorno as INT
DECLARE @nuovo_idturno as INT
DECLARE @idalboturno as INT
DECLARE @old_turni as INT
DECLARE @tot_giorniA as INT
DECLARE @tot_giorniB as INT
DECLARE @conta_giorni_incremento as INT
DECLARE @conta_avvocati as INT
DECLARE @avv as INT
DECLARE @altri_turni AS INT
DECLARE @neg_giorni_incremento as int
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- SET VARIABILI PER EVITARE PROBLEMI CON NULL o 0
SET @totale_giorni = 0
SET @tot_avvocati = 0
SET @avv_giorno = 0
SET @conta_giorni = 0
SET @incremento_giorni = 0
SET @incr_dif_giorno = 0
SET @idalboturno = 0
SET @old_turni = 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SET @nuovo_idturno = @idturno
BEGIN TRAN
-- conta i giorni
SELECT @totale_giorni = (DATEDIFF(dd, @data_inizio, @data_fine))+1
-- select da vista avvocati per tipo difensori selezionato.. (controllare anche data_fine_iscrizione?)
create table #Tmp
(
[ID_anagrafica] varchar(50)
)
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFO'
BEGIN
SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFM'
SET @tipo_albo_B = 'CPT'
-- select per contare..
SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*)
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI
SELECT @tot_avvocati As tot_avvocati
-- creo tabella temporanea..
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFM'
BEGIN
SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFO'
SET @tipo_albo_B = 'CPT'
-- select per contare..
SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*)
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI
SELECT @tot_avvocati as tot_avvocati
-- creo tabella temporanea..
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
IF @tipo_albo = 'CPT'
BEGIN
SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFM'
SET @tipo_albo_B = 'DIFO'
-- select per contare..
SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*)
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT
SELECT @tot_avvocati as tot_avvocati
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
DECLARE @idanagrafica varchar(50)
-- GIORNI PER AVVOCATO
-- tot_giorni * n_dif_minimo / tot_avvocati = tot_giorni_avvocato (con intero successivo)
SET @incremento_giorni = ((@totale_giorni * @n_dif)/@tot_avvocati)
-- controllo se c'è resto..
IF ((@totale_giorni * @n_dif)%@tot_avvocati) <> 0
BEGIN
SET @incremento_giorni = @incremento_giorni + 1
END
-- ogni avvocato deve essere difensore per almeno 2 giorni di seguito..
-- quindi se l'incremento è minore di 2 deve essere uguale a 2
IF @incremento_giorni < '2'
BEGIN
SET @incremento_giorni = '2'
END
-- AVVOCATI AL GIORNO
-- numero variabile.. prendere in considerazione il primo intero e l'intero successivo..
SET @avv_giorno = (@incremento_giorni * @tot_avvocati)/@totale_giorni
SET @avv_giornoB = @avv_giorno
-- controllo il resto della divisione.. se <> 0 @avv_giornoB = @avv_giorno + 1..
-- altrimenti i due valori sono uguali..
IF ((@incremento_giorni * @tot_avvocati)%@totale_giorni) <> 0
BEGIN
SET @avv_giornoA = @avv_giorno + 1
END
ELSE
BEGIN
set @avv_giornoA = @avv_giorno
END
-- conteggi giorni totali difensori...
-- giorni con N difensori
SET @tot_giorniB = ((@avv_giornoB * @incremento_giorni)/@totale_giorni)
-- giorni con M difensori
SET @tot_giorniA = @totale_giorni - @tot_giorniB
declare @totale as int
declare @conta_inseriti as int
set @conta_inseriti = 0
set @totale = (@avv_giornoA * @tot_giorniA) + (@avv_giornoB * @tot_giorniB)
-- ciclo per totale dei giorni
SET @conta_giorni = 1
SET @conta_giorni_incremento = 0
SET @conta_avvocati = 0
WHILE @conta_giorni <= @totale_giorni BEGIN
-- ogni giorno @avv deve essere ZERO
SET @avv = 0
IF @conta_giorni <= @tot_giorniA
BEGIN
SET @avv_giorno = @avv_giornoA
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @avv_giorno = @avv_giornoB
END
-- ciclo per ogni giorno per totale di avvocati/giorno
SET @incr_dif_giorno = 0
WHILE (@incr_dif_giorno < @avv_giorno) AND EXISTS(SELECT TOP 1 ID_anagrafica FROM #Tmp) BEGIN
SET @conta_avvocati = @conta_avvocati + 1
SET @data_odierna = DATEADD(dd, (@conta_giorni-1), @data_inizio)
SET @neg_giorni_incremento = -1 * @conta_giorni_incremento
SET @old_turni = 0
SET @altri_turni = 0
SELECT TOP 1 @idanagrafica = ID_anagrafica from #Tmp
DELETE #Tmp WHERE ID_anagrafica = @idanagrafica
-- query che controlla i turni già assegnati per altre liste...
SELECT @old_turni = COUNT(*)
FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio CROSS JOIN
ALBO_TURNO
WHERE
Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idalbo = @idanagrafica
AND
(
ALBO_TURNO.Tipo = @tipo_albo_A --- probabile problema con trigger
OR
ALBO_TURNO.Tipo = @tipo_albo_B
)
AND
(
Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.Data
BETWEEN
DATEADD(dd, (@neg_giorni_incremento + 1), @data_odierna)
AND
DATEADD(dd, (@incremento_giorni-@conta_giorni_incremento), @data_odierna)
)
SELECT @old_turni AS old_turni
-- (nel caso in cui il ciclo ricominci..) controllare che questo avvocato non abbia
-- già un set di giorni in questo turno...
-- passato il primo controllo.. deve passare anche questo..
SELECT @altri_turni = COUNT(*)
FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio
WHERE
Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idalbo = @idanagrafica
AND
Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idturno = @nuovo_idturno
SELECT @altri_turni AS altri_turni
IF @old_turni = NULL
BEGIN
SET @old_turni = 0
END
IF @ALTRI_TURNI = NULL
BEGIN
SET @ALTRI_TURNI = 0
END
IF (@old_turni = 0 AND (@altri_turni = 0 OR @altri_turni < (@incremento_giorni)))
BEGIN
-- se non ci sono turni sovraposti assegna il turno all'avvocato x N giorni (incremento_giorni)
-- seleziono il dettaglio con idturno max per aumentare di uno...
SET @idalboturno = 1
SET @dett_idturno = 1
SELECT @dett_idturno = MAX(idalboturno)
FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio
if (@dett_idturno) = null
begin
set @dett_idturno = 0
end
SET @idalboturno = @dett_idturno + 1
BEGIN TRAN
INSERT Albo_Turno_Dettaglio
(
idalboturno,
idalbo,
idturno,
data
)
VALUES
(
@idalboturno,
@idanagrafica, -- da cursore
@nuovo_idturno,
@data_odierna -- problemi inserimento data??
)
COMMIT
-- valorizza il numero degli avvocati del giorno + 1
SET @incr_dif_giorno = @incr_dif_giorno + 1
END
ELSE
BEGIN
-- non incrementare la variabile...
SET @incr_dif_giorno = @incr_dif_giorno
END
END -- END WHILE AVVOCATI PER GIORNI
SET @conta_giorni_incremento = (@conta_giorni_incremento + 1)
IF @conta_giorni_incremento < @incremento_giorni
BEGIN
--DEVO RIPOPOLARE LA TABELLA PERCHE' OGNI AVVOCATO DEVE AVERE X GIORNI..
-- cancello tutti i record e poi inserisco di nuovo..
DELETE FROM #Tmp
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFO'
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFM'
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
IF @tipo_albo = 'CPT'
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp
SELECT [ID_anagrafica]
FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
set @conta_giorni_incremento = 0
END
SET @conta_giorni = @conta_giorni + 1
END
DROP TABLE #TMP
COMMIT TRAN
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2007
Hi, i'm trying to run wrap a transaction around a block of code to make sure every statement is carried out. Here's what i have:
using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope())
{ ... ts.Complete();}The code executed in the ... part is a set of sql commands within my dal. If this above expression takes less than 30 seconds everything is carried out correctly, however if it takes longer than 30 seconds i receive an sql timeout error. I tried modify the above code to:
using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)))
{ ... ts.Complete();}
But it did not seem to make a difference. I suppose the easiest option would be to increase the timeout for every sql command in my dal but i feel that the 30 second timeout is sufficient for a single command.
Appreciate if someone could tell me how this should be done correctly. Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2008
I have this code
DECLARE @tempTableName VarChar(50)SET @tempTableName = NEWID()
CREATE TABLE #@tempTableName( State Char(2), Billed Money, AslCode VarChar(10))INSERT INTO #@tempTableName EXEC GetRecords '2/1/2008'
which gives me this error when I run
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
GetRecords does a select * from a linked server's table. Which is working fine but if I try to do an insert (into temp table) then I get the error.
Any help?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2007
I am receiving the following error when I run a stored procedure:Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Procedure spXXXXThe SP inserts data into a local (sql 2000) table from a remote sql2000 database. The SP works fine until I add a trigger to thedestination. The contents of the trigger do not appear to matter, as Ihave tried removing everything but one line, which is just a declarestatement. Updating the table with the trigger (even the full trigger)in place does not cause an error. Running the SP without the triggeron the table does not cause the error.I have the exact same setup on another server. Both the SP and thetrigger are IDENTICAL. This setup works on one server, but not theother. The only difference I can see is that the non-working server isWindows 2000 Server, while the working server is Windows 2003 Server.Any idea what's going on here?Thanks in advance.Eric
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2007
SQL2000 / W2K
I'm having issues with a query to a view that references a view on a linked server, that in turn references a view on a third server.
Query to view on Server A --> View on Server B --> View on Server C
I can query from A to B using the linked server.
I can query from B to C.
I can query from A to C.
All servers at the same location on the same domain.
I cannot query a view on A, that references a view on B, where the view on B references a view/table on C
Each linked server configuration uses "Be made using this security context", with the user specified being 'sa'. I was hoping to get security out of the equation for debug purposes, hence the sa use.
I have tried from Query Analyzer using both windows and sql auth.
MSDTC is running on all servers as local system.
The full error returned is:
Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
Thanks for any support,
Chris
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
Dear all,
I have been attempting to set up a linked server in SQL Server 2000 to point to an Oracle database (a very old Oracle database, v7!).
The linked server set up works fine. Then I created a database on the same SQL Server. Within that database I created a view which reads information from a view in the Oracle database (linked server). When I attempted to create this view in Enterprise Manager, I get the following error:
"The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'MSDAORA' was unable to begin a distributed transaction."
And so I created the view in Query Analyzer. This worked perfectly, no errors, and I can now go into Enterprise Manager and call up the view, which happily goes off to the view in the Oracle linked server and pulls back the info. BUT, when I attempt to do the same thing through an application on a different machine (using OLE Db, and a UDL to connect) the same error as above appears.
Does anyone know what this error means, and where I went wrong? Any help greatly appreciated. My view onto the linked server looks like this:
"CREATE VIEW dbo.NLPG_VIEW
AS
SELECT * from openquery(sadaslink, 'select * from NLPG_VIEW')"
Many thanks in advance for your wisdom!
P.S I wondered whether I need to check if the distributed transaction co-ordinator is running but don't know how.
Thanks,
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2004
I have 3 development SQL Servers A, B & C, all running SQL 2000 sp3 and Windows 2003. Servers B & C have a linked server pointing to A, and A has one pointing to B & C. The linkedservers all have RPC , RPC out enabled. I have a stored procedure called test on server A.
Create Proc test
as
Select Top 5 first_name, last_name from people
GO
--code ran on Servers B & C:
create table #tmptbl (nm varchar(100), nm2 varchar(100))
insert into #tmptbl
Exec ServerA.db1.dbo.test
When the Insert....Exec code above is ran from server B it works fine, however when I run it from Server C, I get error 7391
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]
But regular linked server calls (directly to tables) and openquery calls work fine from either server...
Eg
insert into #tmp
Select top 5 first_name, last_name from ServerA.db1.dbo.people
--and this works also
insert into #tmp
Select * from openquery(ServerA, 'Exec db1.dbo.test')
Both servers (B & C) appear to be configured the same, and
I have reconfigured MSDTC on all three boxes through control panel and component manager, have tried using SET xact_abort, SET implicit_transactions, registry hacks (TurnoffRPCsecurity), basically everything listed on Microsoft, and everything I've been able to find in these groups.
If anyone has any ideas, I'd like to hear them.
Tim.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2006
Hello!I have an Oracle linked server connected through MSDAORA. Linked serverqueries work perfectly - the "openquery" ones as well as the4-part-named ones.The problem I have is with embedding the queries within SQL Servertriggers.Trigger:CREATE TRIGGER tgTest ON [dbo].[test]FOR INSERT, UPDATE, DELETEASselect * from openquery(LS, 'select * from ORACLE_TEST')executing "delete from test" in SQL Query Analyzer raises this error:Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tgTest, Line 5The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider'MSDAORA' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'MSDAORA'ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d01b].I've tried almost every solution I found online, but nothing helped:(This looked promissing: http://tinyurl.com/nk2wd , but it didn't get meany futher.Maybe someone can get me through the troubleshoot mentioned in thatlink:- check if DTC running properlyHow do I check that? If I open the "Support services" in EnterpriseManager and right-click the "Distributed Transaction Coordinatior" Ican stop the service, what indicates the service is running, but isthere anything else I should check? I have 0 items in the right windowpane of the DTC item, is it OK?- registry setting as discussed earlierThe following Registry Keys should be entered:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftMSDTCMTxOCI ]"OracleXaLib"="oraclient8.dll""OracleSqlLib"="orasql8.dll""OracleOciLib"="oci.dll"My entries are:"OracleOciLib"="ociw32.dll""OracleSqlLib"="SQLLib18.dll""OracleXaLib"="xa73.dll"Are they OK?- check if Mtxoci.dll is loadedThere is a Mtxoci.dll in my system32 dir, but how do I tell if it'sloaded? Should I regsvr32 it?- SET XACT_ABORT ON should be use in your SQL statement, for example:SET XACT_ABORT ONBEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANSELECT statementCOMMIT TRANI've tried that, both in trigger but also surrounding the query thatfires the trigger.Am getting deseperate - please help. Will send candies!TIA
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a database containing my own tables and data and I wanted tobe able to query this against an accountancy program which has an ODBCdriver. This was never a problem with MS Access and Jet but I hit Jet'slimitations and have moved to SQL.Creating my own SQL database was no problem, but I was unsure of thebest way to be able to be able to have my SQL tables and my accountancysoftware tables appearing in the same Access front end.I created a linked server to the accountancy program. This wassuccessful in that I could see all the tables below the linked server inenterprise manager.My problem occurs when I try to bring the data from these tablesinto my SQL database.I create a new view in my database:-SELECT *FROM OPENQUERY(SAGE_SERVER, 'SELECT * FROM STOCK')(My linked server is called 'SAGE_SERVER' and I am trying to retrieveall columns from the STOCK table.)I then try to save this view and get the following errors.ODBC Error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The operationcould not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'MSDASQL' was unableto begin a distributed transaction.[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]OLE DB Error Trace[OLE/DBProvider 'MSDASQL' ITransactionJoi JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].Thanks in advance,Marcus Thornton.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2015
I am trying to use sql transaction in foreach loop where I am passing 1 ID @ a time .I want to rollback only current ID.1st task in foreach is execute sql task with begin tran and next is data flow task with 2 source and destination for 2 different tables (if anyone fails then rollback from all tables). After data flow is another execute sql task with rollback tran on failure (logical condition on pipe is OR). The rollback works but only rollback 1 table although I want to rollback on current iteration ID of foreach from both tables.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2015
I have a stored procedure that does the following
BEGIN TRANSACTION OUTERTXN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
Copy records from live to archive
END TRANSACTION with commit or rollback
execute sproc to write audit log with success or fail
IF transaction was committed
BEGIN TRANSACTION
Delete records from live the archive
END TRANSACTION with commit or rollback
execute sproc to write audit log with success or fail
End IF
END TRANSACTION OUTERTXN with commit if both inner transactions were successful or rollback if either failed
If either inner transaction rolled back execute sproc to write audit log saying whole process is rolling back End IfMy problem is that if the outer transaction rolls back then I am losing the two audit records because they are part of the transaction scope. I want these executes to commit even if the master transaction fails.
View 2 Replies
View Related
