SQL writes "Hi,
i am getting to trip with SQL Server and i find it is quite interesting.
please send me complex TSQL queries which would help me to test my SQL server expertise.
do let me know what are the URLs where i can find complex TSQL Queries
i appreciate pointers in right direction
Thanks in advance"
I am not sure if I am posting this is the right place, please let me know if a better place exists.I am trying to figure out the distance from a point on the earth to a route between two other points. All points that I have are in latitude and longitude secondsIE: 51-52-40.6700N => 186760.6700NI am able to find the distance between two points on the globe using a custom function FindDist(latitude1, longitude1, latitude2, longitude2)I did the legwork for the math and was able to come up with this psudo code: p1 = start of routep2 = end of routep3 = point of referencep4 = INTERSECT(LINE(p1,p2), PERPENDICULAR_LINE(p1,p2,p3)) The direct distance between p4 and p3 is somewhere in the range of 0 - 70 and encompasses all points in the US (We only deal in the US) which is incorrect. If I do the conversion of p4 to latitude and longitude I get numbers that start out at 1000 which is also incorrect.I am doing the conversion with the following: DECLARE @lat2 VARCHAR(25)SET @lat2 = (@p4x * 3600)IF @p4x < 0BEGINSET @lat2 = @lat2 + 'S'
ENDIF @p4x > 0BEGINSET @lat2 = @lat2 + 'N'
ENDDECLARE @lng2 VARCHAR(25)SET @lng2 = @p4y * 3600IF @p4y < 0BEGINSET @lng2 = @lng2 + 'W'
ENDIF @p4y > 0BEGINSET @lng2 = @lng2 + 'E'
END I am not sure, however, how to either:a) find the latitude / longitude of p4b) find the distance in miles between p3 and p4Either of these will solve my problemI know this is a rather odd question, but if anyone can help me that would be great. If you need more information, let me know and I will try and explain things further.
I was hoping to get a little input on a problem I'm having.
In the DataAccessLayer of my application, I have a "search" function written that takes a bunch of parameters (in the form of a class object) and depending on what each of the paramaters are set to (to include search type parameters) it builds an appropriate select statement. The issue is that my company has recently decided to require all DataAccessLayer functions to use TableAdapters. TableAdapters can use StoredProceedures, and StoredProceedures can make external calls (it all seems a bit backward to me, but there does seem to be a bit of logic in that TableAdapters contain a connection string which is set in the app.Config file)... Anyway, here's an example of how I am doing it currently, and I was hoping someone could suggest a way I could do it with either TSQL, or otherwise. If CLR is the way to go, how does that work?
internal static dsStrongTypeDataSet GetAll(clsMyClass inData)
{
bool first = true;
dsStrongTypeDataSet data = new dsStrongTypeDataSet ();
string selectStatement = "Select * from tblMyTable where ";
//There is one of these if statements for each parameter
if ((inData.Paramater1 != null))
{
if (!first)//not as important in this section of code,
//but there are areas where there are up to 30 parameters
selectStatement += " and ";
if (inData.SrchParameter1 == SearchType.Fuzzy)
selectStatement += " Column1 LIKE ('%" + inData.Parameter1 + "%') ";
else if (inData.SrchParameter1 == SearchType.Literal)
selectStatement += "Column1 = '" + inData.Parameter1 + "'";
first = false;
}
//More if statements like above for EVERY parameter possible
SqlCommand selectCommand =
new SqlCommand(selectStatement, CorrectSqlConnection());
SqlDataAdapter dataAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(selectCommand);
dataAdapter.Fill(data, "tblMyTable");
return data;
}
Greetings SSIS friends,
I have been attempting to implement one of our numerous ETL processes in SSIS but hit a brick wall when I tried replacing a complex stored procedure with a series of Merge Join components.
In the end, I had to settle with using a SQL task which merely calls the stored procedure and this proved to be the better option as the other version where I used SSIS components only took forever to run.
How do people cope with complex transformations?! Do you guys opt for pure TSQL to perform complex transformations and use SSIS components for control flow+simple(ish) data flow tasks?
I am confused.
Dear All,
I want to practise writing complex T sql queries in SQl Server 2005 which involve several joins, sub-queries in a single query.
This kind of queries are commonly required in Reporting scenarios where a single report may have to be prepared from 2,3 or more tables.
Presently I am able to write queries of moderate complexity.
Therefore I am looking for web tutorials, books which contains some solved examples as well as some Unsolved ones. The Unsolved ones should have the answers given so that one comes to know if he makes a mistake. The web tutorials can be from paid sites as well.
If any of you have a good collection of such queries then pls be kind enough to send it to me.I will give my email id for the purpose. If anybody can help in some other way pls let me know.
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks .
hi thereanyone had an idea to join following 2 queries to 1????----- QUERY 1 ---------------------------------------------SELECT TMS_CaseF_2.Name AS TCDomain_0,TMS_CaseF_3.Name AS TCDomain_1,TMS.CaseF.Name AS TCFolder_2,TMS_CaseF_1.Name AS TCFolder_3,TMS.TestCase.Name AS TCName_4,TMS_TestCase_1.Name AS TCName_5,TMS.LogFolder.Name AS PlannedLogFolder_6,TMS.Log.Name AS PlannedLog_7,TMS.CaseResult.RecordedCaseName AS TCRecordedName_8,TMS.TestPlan.Name AS Plan_9FROM((((((((((TMS.Build INNER JOIN TMS.LogFolder ON TMS.Build.UID =TMS.LogFolder.Build)INNER JOIN TMS.Log ON TMS.LogFolder.UID = TMS.Log.LogFolder)INNER JOIN TMS.CaseResult ON TMS.Log.UID = TMS.CaseResult.Log)INNER JOIN TMS.TestCase ON TMS.CaseResult.TestCase =TMS.TestCase.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF ON TMS.TestCase.Parent = TMS.CaseF.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.TestCase AS TMS_TestCase_1 ON TMS.TestCase.Parent =TMS_TestCase_1.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_1 ON TMS_TestCase_1.Parent =TMS_CaseF_1.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_2 ON TMS_CaseF_1.Parent =TMS_CaseF_2.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_3 ON TMS.CaseF.Parent =TMS_CaseF_3.UID)INNER JOIN TMS.TestPlan ON TMS.TestCase.TestPlan = TMS.TestPlan.UID)WHERE (((TMS.LogFolder.Name) Like 'TR1%')AND ((TMS.Build.Name)='Planning_VD10A'))ORDER BY TMS.CaseF.Name,TMS_CaseF_1.Name,TMS.TestCase.Name,TMS_TestCase_1.Name;------------------------------------------------------------------ QUERY 2 ---------------------------------------------SELECT TMS.CaseResult.RecordedCaseNameFROM ((TMS.Build INNER JOIN TMS.LogFolder ON TMS.Build.UID =TMS.LogFolder.Build)INNER JOIN TMS.Log ON TMS.LogFolder.UID = TMS.Log.LogFolder)INNER JOIN TMS.CaseResult ON TMS.Log.UID = TMS.CaseResult.LogWHERE (((TMS.LogFolder.Name) Like 'VD%')AND ((TMS.Build.Name)='VD10A IT_APP'));
View 1 Replies View RelatedAlright just starting out in ASP.NET and it's making my head spin, but I think I'm getting it.My schema in brief : Images, Categories, and a table in the middle so we can have a many-to-many relationship between images and categories. My issue is searching. I can search by keyword, and limit it to categories. So, in pseudo sql.. SELECT ... WHERE keyword LIKE '%test%' and category_id in (1,5,20,66); I made a variable for the keyword no problem. But how can I get this dynamic list? Or, is there another way about going this problem?
View 6 Replies View RelatedHello Friends. I have few doubts regarding the use of Sqldatasource server control. Is the control flexible enough to achieve these things:- 1.To perform complex queries using Sqldatasource. For eg:- using JOIN to retrieve/insert data from/into multiple tables.2.Performing cascading dropdownlist using sql database as datasource.3.Performing For loops eg:-populating the multiple items into the listbox from sqldatasource. and retrieving them at once.4.use ajax update panel.etc.any example/sample on how to achieve these task?thanks.jack.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm dealing with queries that manages a lot of data consolidation and I'm having to repeat large blocks of code to get the desired result.
I'm wondering if that is any way to make it simple.
My queries looks like this:
Code BlockSELECT
(A + B) AS C,
(D + E) AS F,
(G + H) AS I,
(A + B) * (D + E) AS total1,
(D + E) * (G + H) AS total2,
(A + B) * (G + H) AS total3,
(A + B) * (D + E) * (G + H) AS total
FROM table
Can I somehow declare each part of the expression and make it something like this?
Code Block
SELECT
(A + B) AS C,
(D + E) AS F,
(G + H) AS I,
C * F AS total1,
F * I AS total2,
C * I AS total3,
C * F * I AS total
FROM table
Maybe it seems silly, but each sub-expression, on the real life, includes a lot of CASEs and aggragate functions and my codes are getting complex and confuse.
Since I have lots of code pieces that I repeat more than once, I would like to make it simpler.
tks for any help
Hi All -
Any recommendations for good advanced t-sql books/articles? I find myself involved with writing increasingly more complex queries and after spending a few hours on some, and then searching on this site for potential answers/help, I am wondering if there might be some good books on creating more advanced/complex t-sql for real world scenarios.
Thanks
- will
I am not very good in queries. Could you please suggest me some web site/Tutorial/Artical where i can get Study Material for complex and real life queries. I know the syntexes, I just need to practice queries to enhance my skills
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have web forms with about 10-15 optional search parameters (fields) for a give table. Each item (textbox) in the form is treated as an AND condition.
Right now I build complex WHERE clauses based on wheather data is present in a textbox and AND each one in the clause. Also, if a particular field is "match any word", i get a ANDed set of OR's. As you can imagine, the WHERE clause gets quite large.
I build clauses like this (i.e., 4 fields shown):
SELECT * from tableName WHERE (aaa like '%data') AND (bbb = 'data') AND (ccc like 'data%') AND ( (xxx like '%data') OR (yyy like '%data%') )
My question is, are stored procedures better for building such dynamic SQL clauses? I may have one field or all fifteen. I've written generic code for building the clauses, but I don't know much about stored procedures and am wondering if I'm making this more difficult on myself.
Can anyone please give me the equivalent tsql for sql server 2000 for the following two queries which works fine in sql server 2005
1
-- Full Table Structure
select t.object_id, t.name as 'tablename', c.name as 'columnname', y.name as 'typename', case y.namewhen 'varchar' then convert(varchar, c.max_length)when 'decimal' then convert(varchar, c.precision) + ', ' + convert(varchar, c.scale)else ''end attrib,y.*from sys.tables t, sys.columns c, sys.types ywhere t.object_id = c.object_idand t.name not in ('sysdiagrams')and c.system_type_id = y.system_type_idand c.system_type_id = y.user_type_idorder by t.name, c.column_id
2
-- PK and Index
select t.name as 'tablename', i.name as 'indexname', c.name as 'columnname' , i.is_unique, i.is_primary_key, ic.is_descending_keyfrom sys.indexes i, sys.tables t, sys.index_columns ic, sys.columns cwhere t.object_id = i.object_idand t.object_id = ic.object_idand t.object_id = c.object_idand i.index_id = ic.index_idand c.column_id = ic.column_idand t.name not in ('sysdiagrams')order by t.name, i.index_id, ic.index_column_id
This sql is extracting some sort of the information about the structure of the sql server database[2005]
I need a sql whihc will return the same result for sql server 2000
HelloWhen I use a PreparedStatement (in jdbc) with the following query:SELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = ?ORDER BY group_nameIt takes a significantly longer time to run (the time it takes forexecuteQuery() to return ) than if I useSELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = 'M'ORDER BY group_nameAfter tracing the problem down, it appears that this is not preciselya java issue, but rather has to do with the underlying cost of runningparameterized queries.When I open up MS Enterprise Manager and type the same query in - italso takes far longer for the parameterized query to run when I usethe version of the query with bind (?) parameters.This only happens when the table in question is large - I am seeingthis behaviour for a table with > 1,000,000 records. It doesn't makesense to me why a parameterized query would run SLOWER than acompletely ad-hoc query when it is supposed to be more efficient.Furthermore, if one were to say that the reason for this behaviour isthat the query is first getting compliled and then the parameters aregetting sent over - thus resulting in a longer percieved executiontime - I would respond that if this were the case then A) it shouldn'tbe any different if it were run against a large or small table B) thisperformance hit should only be experienced the first time that thequery is run C) the performance hit should only be 2x the time for thenon-parameterized query takes to run - the difference in response timeis more like 4-10 times the time it takes for the non parameterizedversion to run!!!Is this a sql-server specific problem or something that would pertainto other databases as well? I there something about the coorect use ofbind parameters that I overall don't understand?If I can provide some hints in Java then this would be great..otherwise, do I need to turn/off certain settings on the databaseitself?If nothing else works, I will have to either find or write a wrapperaround the Statement object that acts like a prepared statement but inreality sends regular Statement objects to the JDBC driver. I wouldthen put some inteligence in the database layer for deciding whetherto use this special -hack- object or a regular prepared statementdepending on the expected overhead. (Obviously this logic would onlybe written in once place.. etc.. IoC.. ) HOWEVER, I would desperatelywant to avoid doing this.Please help :)
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello,
Lets look at this table :
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TableHisto](
[Id] [int] NOT NULL,
[Week] [nvarchar](50) COLLATE French_CI_AS NULL,
[Project] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description', @value=N'Identifiant d''enregistrement' ,@level0type=N'SCHEMA', @level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', @level1name=N'TableHisto', @level2type=N'COLUMN', @level2name=N'Id'
GO
EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description', @value=N'Date de l''enregistrement' ,@level0type=N'SCHEMA', @level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', @level1name=N'TableHisto', @level2type=N'COLUMN', @level2name=N'Week'
GO
EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description', @value=N'Projet de référence' ,@level0type=N'SCHEMA', @level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', @level1name=N'TableHisto', @level2type=N'COLUMN', @level2name=N'Project'
It is a table where i store projects week reports.
I want to make a request to display a table with project ID in Row, Weeks in columns and either TableHisto.id or Null value in cell.
I use SQL 2005. Thanks for any help
I need some help on how to structure a sql statement. I am creating a membership directory and I need the stored procedure to output the Last Name, First Name (and if married) Spouse First Name. Like this Flinstone, Fred & Wilma All members are in one directory linked by two fields. [Family ID] all the family members have the same family id and then there is a Family position id that shows if they are the Husband, Wife or Kids. I have no problem with this part select (LastName + ',' + FirstName) as Name, [Phone 1] as Phone, [Unit Name] as WD, [Street 1] as Street, SUBSTRING(City,1,3) as City, SUBSTRING(Postal,1,5) as Zipfrom Membership Where [HH Order]=1 Order By LastName ASC Could someone help me on how to display the " & Spouse FirstName " as part of the name field only if there is a spouse [HH Order]=2 for the current [Family ID]????
View 6 Replies View RelatedI need to get multiple values for each row in a database, then do a calculation and insert the calculation and the accountnumber related to the calculation the data, into a different column. I get an error trying it this way...there is no real identifier, it is jsut something that needs to get done per row...any ideas on how I can accomplish this?
Declare @NetCommission decimal
Declare @AccountNumber varchar(50)
Set @NetCommission = (select (CommissionRebate * Quantity)
from Account A
Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber)
Set @AccountNumber = (select A.AccountNumber
from cmsAccount A
Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber)
Insert into Transaction
(
Payee
,Deposit
,AccountNumber
)
Values
(
'Account Credit'
,@NetCommission
,@AccountNumber
)
Hello,
could someone help with this query in a stored proc.?
SET @SQL = 'SET ''' + @avgwgt + ''' = '
'(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight)
FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN (' + @cagearray + ')
and ItemDate =''' + CONVERT(varchar(23),@startdate) + ''')'
EXEC @SQL
I'm trying to get an average value across dynamically selected rows. (I'm using a list array to deliver the selection to the stored proc). I need to re-use the average value within the procedure,so it's not enough to output it as a column of the resultset - EG. 'Select AVG(AverageWeight) as AvgWgt' . If I take out the @avgwgt line it works fine, but otherwise I'm getting this error:
"Incorrect syntax near '(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight)
FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN ('."
It may be that I can access a column of the resultset in the rest of the procedure, and that would help avoid the use of pesky apostrophes, but I don't know how to do it.
I've written a lot of queries in the past, but I'm having a lot of trouble with this one.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm sure there is a way of cracking this, but I can't think of a good solution. Right now I am not happy with the solutions I come up with, one of which takes 4 minutes to run on SQL Server
The scenario: User is presented with search page where one or more search terms can be entered/selected. There are no required parameters. It can be any or all of the possibilities presented. Below is a model of the search parameters presented.
The user will either select to show more options under Profile ABC, or go down to Profile STU or Profile XYZ to show more options, or even select all Profiles and then select from Type 1 and either a. or. b. or. c. or ALL of the above.
I cannot predict what a user will make part of the search query so I have to have a stored procedure ready which can handle any or all of the parameters a user may select.
Am I biting off more than I can chew (it seems so)? Or is there an elegant way of handling the unknown combination of search parameters that a user might throw into my sql query?
I'm running this under ASP 1.0 and SQL Server 2000.
[check to show the options below] Profile ABC
[check to shore more options] Type 1
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto
C. ditto
D. ditto
[check to show more options] Type 2
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto
C. ditto
D. ditto
[check to show more options] Type 3
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto
C. ditto
D. ditto
[check to select more options] Type 4
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto
C. ditto
D. ditto
[check to show more options] Profile XYZ (as above)
[check to select more options] Profile STU (as above)
I'm working on a system that used to load control dynamically into a table structure based on "Row" and "Column" properties in the item object.
The system is now being revamped, and instead of a table structure, it's being loaded into a list, which will be controled by css. The new relevant variables are "Sequence" and "Width."
Since there are already thousands of existing items in the database, I have to write a script that can take a really good guess at legacy items' Row and Col, and input values for Sequence and Width.
Since all items exist on "tabs," I can query for all items on a given tabID, Ordered By Row, Col -- that will give me a sequence.
Width isn't literal, it has 6 presets: Whole, Half, Third, Quarter, Two Thirds, Three Quarters, represented in the table as 0,1,2,3,4,5 -- for our purposes, I'll assume that all items on a row are equal in width. We can determine width by figuring out the number of items within the same row, so if there is only one in the row, it's a Whole (0), if there are three in the row it'll be a Third (2), etc.
I'd like to create a query that gets all items by tab, assigns the appropriate sequence, and figures out how many items are in the row with a given item, to assign the correct width.... but I have no idea how to make t-sql do that. I don't mind multiple queries to get the whole process done, and it doesn't need to be efficient -- this is a one-off script to run to give legacy items values that we can work with.
Where would I start?
HI.
I have 3 tables
1- std with : stdID , programID.
2- Programs with :ProgramID , Cost
3 - Movements with : stdID , balance.
the first table contain the stdID and ProgramID , some times the std hasn't programID that mean he hasn't programID. then we return null.
if the std has programID there is to cases.
the first one he have a movement on his balance then we get the biggest balance for the std.
the second case he hasn't any moventen then we get his balance from Programs table by the ProgramID .
I need sql server function that return table like this
stdID , Balance
that means every std with his Balance.
Regards.
This is too complex anyone know how to make it less complex.
I am trying to get all the selected fields from contacts into a datagrid where the other fields contain a string in textbox1.
This works
SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%'))
When i add all the rest of the fields it says its too complex. Please Help
SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([B] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([E] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([G] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([JE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([L] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([M] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ME] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([MK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ML] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([N] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([S] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ST] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TQ] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([UB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([W] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([YO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%'))
hi how are you please help me in my problem which i can't make it.
Now, i have a project in ASP.NET and SQL Server 2005. let's call the project an image gallery, in my project i have a table named "Category" in which all the categories are in this table. also while adding a new category a new table will be created automatically with the name of that category.
now, what i want is that to build a query that reads the contents of the tables that the tables name are the names of the each record in the "Category" table.
is that possible ?
please if any one help can me in my problem.
I have the following SQL 2000 database table:
NEWS (IDNews, Country, PublishDate, Title)
I have to get a dataset containing only one record for each country, having most recent publish date.
Any suggestions? Thanks.
I have 2 tables, say table1, and table2. There is a DocID (primary key) in table1. In table2, DocID is the foriegn key. There can be more than 1 DocID.
this is the table structure (sample)
Table 1:
DocID DocName OtherID etc
1 test 2
2 test2 3
Table2:
TblID DocID OtherID
1 1 10
2 1 13
3 1 25
how do I join these two tables, such that I get all the otherID's for each DocID.
ie.,
DocID OtherID
1 2 and 10 and 13 and 25
2 3
i am writing this query to display search results on a search page (with keyword search) and so, if I display the result in more than one row, then the user might think that there is more than document...whereas the case is that there is only one document with more than one other ID's.
is there any way I can do this? display...more than 1otherID in the same row for the same DociD?
Currently, I am using a left outer join of table1 and table2.
An suggestions on how to do this?
I cant get "order by" to work in this sql query..I use this query:
"SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn"and I want to add this some where to get 12 random records: "ORDER BY NewID()"I tried this: "SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn ORDER BY NewID()"" but get the error:"ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified"I can´t figure out how I should write the query..Somebody have any ideas??/Radiwoi
Hi,
I need a way to retrieve records from a table with a 30 min interval between the records.
For e.g., Lets say I have the following data in a table :-
userid hitdt
1 4/1/2003 10:00 AM
1 4/1/2003 10:15 AM
1 4/1/2003 10:31 AM
1 4/1/2003 11:10 AM
1 4/1/2003 11:30 AM
1 4/1/2003 11:41 AM
I need a query which would return me the following recordset :-
userId hitId
1 4/1/2003 10:00 AM
1 4/1/2003 10:31 AM
1 4/1/2003 11:10 AM
1 4/1/2003 11:41 AM
Is there a way to do this without using a cursor ?
Thanks
table_a has patient_id, tran_id and other fields a,b,c
table_b has patient_id,tran_id, key_id
and other fileds d,e,f
table_a patien_id + tran_id is unique
table_b patient_id + tran_id is not unique, could be duplicated.
I have to create a query which will retrieve fields from table a a,b,c and fields d,e from table b where
table a. patient_id + tran_id =
tableb.patient_id + tran_id and table_b.key_id is the min key_id for that patient_id + tran_id.
I should retrieve just one record.
How would I be able to do that?
Please help!!
Thanks
I have a sp which requires a somewhat(at least for me) where clause. It needs a standard clause but then needs to differentiate the where based on whether a certain field is null or not. I didn't think an if would work but neither is my case. Below is the where clause. Thanks
where(OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RESTRICTION1 in
('Dental hold', 'Medical hold', 'Mental health hold')
AND
case when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is not null
then
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@sdate AND
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO >= @edate
when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is null
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@edate
Code:
ID GroupID User
1 101 Tom
2 101 Mark
3 101 Clark
4 102 Tom
5 102 Mark
6 103 Tom
7 103 Clark
8 104 Tom
9 104 Clark
10 105 Tom
11 105 Bred
the users of Group 101 are Tom,Mark,Clark
the users of Group 102 are Tom,Mark
the users of Group 103 are Tom,Clark
the users of Group 104 are Tom,Clark
the users of Group 105 are Tom,Bred
I want to show Tom that
Both You and Clark are together in 3 groups
Both You and Mark are together in 2 groups
Both You and Bred are together in 1 group
I might have to redesign the tables for this, but I'll ask anyway. I have a table with the following fields:
Email - VarChar
Seminar - Int
PeckingOrder - Int.
As I add addresses to the table, each one has a Seminar, and then each Seminar has a Pecking Order Value. If an email address shows up for more than one seminar, it can have multiple records. IE:
email1 - 1523 - 424
email1 - 1526 - 124
email1 - 1524 - 235
email2 - 1526 - 124
email2 - 1524 - 235
for address, seminar, and pecking order would be sample entries into the table. Give or Take 1000 records in the table at any given time. What I want to pull out is:
Distinct Email Addresses
For each Email Address - The Max(PeckingOrder)
And the Seminar that's associated with Max(PeckingOrder)
For the sample data set above, I'd want to see these two records returned by the query:
email1 - 1523 - 424
email2 - 1524 - 235
I can't seem to get the Having / Where clause right to pull those two records properly. Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
--Daniel
Edited - Didn't realize the BB removed email addresses.
Here is my data
------------------------------
BookName | Price
Book 1 | 75
Book 2 | 100
Book 3 | 45
Book 4 | 10
I want to make a report eg:
Category | Total
>= 75 | 2
25 - 74 | 1
< 25 | 1