I have to implement a complex algorithm that processes each row and each column.I have bunch complex steps at the end of which a table gets populated with the processed columns.
How do I do this using CLR integration?
One of the steps of processing involved per column is as follows:-
1)For each column,find successive invalid values from the start of the column.Invalid value= any value <0
2)find the invalid value depth of each column(no of successive invalid values from start)
3)If after these invalid vlaues,there is a valid value and another invalid value,replace current invalid value with valid value.
ie replace invalid value only if it has a valid value above it.
4)find the column with maximum invalue value depth and delete that many rows from the table.
Here's am example:-
Suppose there are 2 columsn colA and ColB.The columns have different datatypes eg decimal,int,string etc.
For simplicity colA and colB are ints.
RowID is keeping track of the row number.
Step1)successive invalid values from start=0,-5,-3
Step2)Invalid value depth=3(because there are 3 rows from step 1)
Step3)0,-5,-3 do not have any valid value above them.But -9 has a valid value 4 above it.So replace -9 with 4.
so colA after the algo will look as follows
RowID ColA
------------
1 0
2 -5
3 -3
4 1
5 4
6 4(replaced -9 with 4)
7 5
8 8
Now do the next column colB
RowID ColA
------------
1 -6
2 0
3 0
4 -7
5 4
6 8
7 -5
8 -8
Step1)successive invalid values from start=-6,0,0,-7
Step2)depth of invalid values=4
Step3)Next invalid value -5 occurs at RowID 7
and has a valid value 8 above it.
Replace -5 with previous valid vlaue ie 8.
RowID 8 has invalid value -8 .Its previous invalid value(-5) got replaced by a valid value 8.So replace RowID8 also with value of RowID 7 ie 8
Output at the end of these steps
RowID ColA
------------
1 -6
2 0
3 0
4 -7
5 4
6 8
7 8(replaced -5 with 8)
8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
Step4:Get the maximum invalid value depth
In this case ColB had depth=4 which is greater than ColA which had dept=3.so delete 4 rows from the beginning of the table
So the table will be
RowID colA colB
----------------------------------------
5 4 4
6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 8
7 5 8 (replaced -5 with 8)
8 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
I have to implement a complex algorithm that processes each row and each column.I have bunch complex steps at the end of which a table gets populated with the processed columns.
My question is whether it is possible and feasible to do this kind of processing using CLR integration or should I stick to T-SQL ?
One of the steps of processing involved per column is as follows:- 1)For each column,find successive invalid values from the start of the column.Invalid value= any value <0 2)find the invalid value depth of each column(no of successive invalid values from start) 3)If after these invalid vlaues,there is a valid value and another invalid value,replace current invalid value with valid value. ie replace invalid value only if it has a valid value above it. 4)find the column with maximum invalue value depth and delete that many rows from the table.
Here's an example:- Suppose there are 2 columsn colA and ColB.The columns have different datatypes eg decimal,int,string etc. For simplicity colA and colB are ints. RowID is keeping track of the row number.
Step1)successive invalid values from start=0,-5,-3 Step2)Invalid value depth=3(because there are 3 rows from step 1) Step3)0,-5,-3 do not have any valid value above them.But -9 has a valid value 4 above it.So replace -9 with 4.
so colA after the algo will look as follows RowID ColA ------------ 1 0 2 -5 3 -3 4 1 5 4 6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 7 5 8 8
Now do the next column colB RowID ColA ------------ 1 -6 2 0 3 0 4 -7 5 4 6 8 7 -5 8 -8
Step1)successive invalid values from start=-6,0,0,-7 Step2)depth of invalid values=4 Step3)Next invalid value -5 occurs at RowID 7 and has a valid value 8 above it. Replace -5 with previous valid vlaue ie 8.
RowID 8 has invalid value -8 .Its previous invalid value(-5) got replaced by a valid value 8.So replace RowID8 also with value of RowID 7 ie 8
Output at the end of these steps RowID ColA ------------ 1 -6 2 0 3 0 4 -7 5 4 6 8 7 8(replaced -5 with 8) 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
Step4:Get the maximum invalid value depth In this case ColB had depth=4 which is greater than ColA which had dept=3. So delete 4 rows from the beginning of the table So the output will be
RowID colA colB ---------------------------------------- 5 4 4 6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 8 7 5 8 (replaced -5 with 8) 8 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
I have to implement a complex algorithm that processes each row and each column.I have bunch complex steps at the end of which a table gets populated with the processed columns.
My question is as to what is the best way to do this?CLR integration or T-SQL? Also I would appreciate any ideas as to how to go about using either approaches.
One of the steps of processing involved per column is as follows:- 1)For each column,find successive invalid values from the start of the column.Invalid value= any value <0 2)find the invalid value depth of each column(no of successive invalid values from start) 3)If after these invalid vlaues,there is a valid value and another invalid value,replace current invalid value with valid value. ie replace invalid value only if it has a valid value above it. 4)find the column with maximum invalue value depth and delete that many rows from the table.
Here's am example:- Suppose there are 2 columsn colA and ColB.The columns have different datatypes eg decimal,int,string etc. For simplicity colA and colB are ints. RowID is keeping track of the row number.
Step1)successive invalid values from start=0,-5,-3 Step2)Invalid value depth=3(because there are 3 rows from step 1) Step3)0,-5,-3 do not have any valid value above them.But -9 has a valid value 4 above it.So replace -9 with 4.
so colA after the algo will look as follows RowID ColA ------------ 1 0 2 -5 3 -3 4 1 5 4 6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 7 5 8 8
Now do the next column colB RowID ColA ------------ 1 -6 2 0 3 0 4 -7 5 4 6 8 7 -5 8 -8
Step1)successive invalid values from start=-6,0,0,-7 Step2)depth of invalid values=4 Step3)Next invalid value -5 occurs at RowID 7 and has a valid value 8 above it. Replace -5 with previous valid vlaue ie 8.
RowID 8 has invalid value -8 .Its previous invalid value(-5) got replaced by a valid value 8.So replace RowID8 also with value of RowID 7 ie 8
Output at the end of these steps RowID ColA ------------ 1 -6 2 0 3 0 4 -7 5 4 6 8 7 8(replaced -5 with 8) 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
Step4:Get the maximum invalid value depth In this case ColB had depth=4 which is greater than ColA which had dept=3.so delete 4 rows from the beginning of the table So the table will be
RowID colA colB ---------------------------------------- 5 4 4 6 4(replaced -9 with 4) 8 7 5 8 (replaced -5 with 8) 8 8 8(replaced -8 with 8)
Hello friends, I needed a suggestion, I am currently working on a reporting website that generates reports and i need to store all the reports in the database.
I usually go by row wise processing as it can be easily controlled but the problem is there will be a lot of reports, that is an estimation of 30,000 rows in a month and i m not sure if sql server can hold more than 2 billion rows per table.
I have question about indexed and not indexed Persisted columns on sql server 2005. It's a bug?
First?, my version of SQL Server is Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3186.00 (Intel X86) Aug 11 2007 03:13:58 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
Now I create two tables and try four select queries:
Code Snippet SET ANSI_NULLS ON SET ANSI_PADDING ON SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON SET ARITHABORT ON SET CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL ON SET NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT OFF SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO create table t1 (id int primary key, id_bigint as cast(id as bigint)) GO create table t2 (id int primary key, id_bigint as cast(id as bigint) persisted) GO select * from t1 -- (1) -- Clustered index scan with two times Compute Scalar GO select * from t2 -- (2) -- Clustered index scan with one times Compute Scalar GO create index IX_t2 on t2 (id_bigint) GO select * from t2 -- (3) -- Index Scan with one times Compute Scalar GO select * from t2 where id_bigint = 0 -- (4) -- Index Seek with one times Compute Scalar GO drop table t1 GO drop table t2 GO SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
1. I don't understand why access to computed column raise scalar computation wto times? 2. I don't understand why access to persisted computed column raise any scalar computation? 3. I don't understand why access to persisted computed column over index required any scalar computations?
Can anyone from Microsoft SQL Server Team told me about this mistake? It's a BUG or I incorrect understand value of the "PERSISTED" word?
-- Thanks with avanced. WBR, Roman S. Golubin grominc[at]gmail.com
I have built a package in which i use a derived column to create a new set of columns and then pass the same to another target transformation.
The issue now what I am facing is, the re are certain number of records coming from source(16 rows) and gets processed before the Derived Column transformation, but after that, no records gets processed after the derived column transformation.
The package status shows as Success, but there is no records being written in the target table.
I am working on a SSIS package. I want error records to be redirected to a different table. Natively, the package passes the Error Code and Column Code (don't know what to call it, but it's a number). I found a script to get the error description, but can't find an equivalent to get the Column name.
Hi,I'm constructing a query that will performs a lot o datetimecalculumns to generate columns.All that operations are dependent of a base calculum that is performedon the query and its result is stored in a columna returned.I wanna find a way of reusing this generated column, to avoidreprocessing that calculumn to perform the other operations, causethat query will be used in a critical application, and all saving isfew.Thanks a lot.
I have web forms with about 10-15 optional search parameters (fields) for a give table. Each item (textbox) in the form is treated as an AND condition.
Right now I build complex WHERE clauses based on wheather data is present in a textbox and AND each one in the clause. Also, if a particular field is "match any word", i get a ANDed set of OR's. As you can imagine, the WHERE clause gets quite large.
I build clauses like this (i.e., 4 fields shown):
SELECT * from tableName WHERE (aaa like '%data') AND (bbb = 'data') AND (ccc like 'data%') AND ( (xxx like '%data') OR (yyy like '%data%') )
My question is, are stored procedures better for building such dynamic SQL clauses? I may have one field or all fifteen. I've written generic code for building the clauses, but I don't know much about stored procedures and am wondering if I'm making this more difficult on myself.
I need some help on how to structure a sql statement. I am creating a membership directory and I need the stored procedure to output the Last Name, First Name (and if married) Spouse First Name. Like this Flinstone, Fred & Wilma All members are in one directory linked by two fields. [Family ID] all the family members have the same family id and then there is a Family position id that shows if they are the Husband, Wife or Kids. I have no problem with this part select (LastName + ',' + FirstName) as Name, [Phone 1] as Phone, [Unit Name] as WD, [Street 1] as Street, SUBSTRING(City,1,3) as City, SUBSTRING(Postal,1,5) as Zipfrom Membership Where [HH Order]=1 Order By LastName ASC Could someone help me on how to display the " & Spouse FirstName " as part of the name field only if there is a spouse [HH Order]=2 for the current [Family ID]????
I need to get multiple values for each row in a database, then do a calculation and insert the calculation and the accountnumber related to the calculation the data, into a different column. I get an error trying it this way...there is no real identifier, it is jsut something that needs to get done per row...any ideas on how I can accomplish this? Declare @NetCommission decimal Declare @AccountNumber varchar(50) Set @NetCommission = (select (CommissionRebate * Quantity) from Account A Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber) Set @AccountNumber = (select A.AccountNumber from cmsAccount A Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber)
Hello, could someone help with this query in a stored proc.? SET @SQL = 'SET ''' + @avgwgt + ''' = ' '(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight) FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN (' + @cagearray + ') and ItemDate =''' + CONVERT(varchar(23),@startdate) + ''')' EXEC @SQL I'm trying to get an average value across dynamically selected rows. (I'm using a list array to deliver the selection to the stored proc). I need to re-use the average value within the procedure,so it's not enough to output it as a column of the resultset - EG. 'Select AVG(AverageWeight) as AvgWgt' . If I take out the @avgwgt line it works fine, but otherwise I'm getting this error: "Incorrect syntax near '(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight) FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN ('." It may be that I can access a column of the resultset in the rest of the procedure, and that would help avoid the use of pesky apostrophes, but I don't know how to do it.
I'm sure there is a way of cracking this, but I can't think of a good solution. Right now I am not happy with the solutions I come up with, one of which takes 4 minutes to run on SQL Server The scenario: User is presented with search page where one or more search terms can be entered/selected. There are no required parameters. It can be any or all of the possibilities presented. Below is a model of the search parameters presented. The user will either select to show more options under Profile ABC, or go down to Profile STU or Profile XYZ to show more options, or even select all Profiles and then select from Type 1 and either a. or. b. or. c. or ALL of the above. I cannot predict what a user will make part of the search query so I have to have a stored procedure ready which can handle any or all of the parameters a user may select. Am I biting off more than I can chew (it seems so)? Or is there an elegant way of handling the unknown combination of search parameters that a user might throw into my sql query? I'm running this under ASP 1.0 and SQL Server 2000.
[check to show the options below] Profile ABC [check to shore more options] Type 1
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Type 2
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Type 3
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to select more options] Type 4
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Profile XYZ (as above) [check to select more options] Profile STU (as above)
I'm working on a system that used to load control dynamically into a table structure based on "Row" and "Column" properties in the item object. The system is now being revamped, and instead of a table structure, it's being loaded into a list, which will be controled by css. The new relevant variables are "Sequence" and "Width." Since there are already thousands of existing items in the database, I have to write a script that can take a really good guess at legacy items' Row and Col, and input values for Sequence and Width. Since all items exist on "tabs," I can query for all items on a given tabID, Ordered By Row, Col -- that will give me a sequence. Width isn't literal, it has 6 presets: Whole, Half, Third, Quarter, Two Thirds, Three Quarters, represented in the table as 0,1,2,3,4,5 -- for our purposes, I'll assume that all items on a row are equal in width. We can determine width by figuring out the number of items within the same row, so if there is only one in the row, it's a Whole (0), if there are three in the row it'll be a Third (2), etc.
I'd like to create a query that gets all items by tab, assigns the appropriate sequence, and figures out how many items are in the row with a given item, to assign the correct width.... but I have no idea how to make t-sql do that. I don't mind multiple queries to get the whole process done, and it doesn't need to be efficient -- this is a one-off script to run to give legacy items values that we can work with. Where would I start?
HI. I have 3 tables 1- std with : stdID , programID. 2- Programs with :ProgramID , Cost 3 - Movements with : stdID , balance. the first table contain the stdID and ProgramID , some times the std hasn't programID that mean he hasn't programID. then we return null. if the std has programID there is to cases. the first one he have a movement on his balance then we get the biggest balance for the std. the second case he hasn't any moventen then we get his balance from Programs table by the ProgramID .
I need sql server function that return table like this stdID , Balance that means every std with his Balance. Regards.
This is too complex anyone know how to make it less complex. I am trying to get all the selected fields from contacts into a datagrid where the other fields contain a string in textbox1. This works SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%')) When i add all the rest of the fields it says its too complex. Please Help
SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([B] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([E] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([G] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([JE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([L] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([M] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ME] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([MK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ML] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([N] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([S] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ST] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TQ] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([UB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([W] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([YO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%'))
hi how are you please help me in my problem which i can't make it. Now, i have a project in ASP.NET and SQL Server 2005. let's call the project an image gallery, in my project i have a table named "Category" in which all the categories are in this table. also while adding a new category a new table will be created automatically with the name of that category. now, what i want is that to build a query that reads the contents of the tables that the tables name are the names of the each record in the "Category" table. is that possible ? please if any one help can me in my problem.
I have 2 tables, say table1, and table2. There is a DocID (primary key) in table1. In table2, DocID is the foriegn key. There can be more than 1 DocID.
how do I join these two tables, such that I get all the otherID's for each DocID. ie., DocID OtherID 1 2 and 10 and 13 and 25 2 3
i am writing this query to display search results on a search page (with keyword search) and so, if I display the result in more than one row, then the user might think that there is more than document...whereas the case is that there is only one document with more than one other ID's.
is there any way I can do this? display...more than 1otherID in the same row for the same DociD? Currently, I am using a left outer join of table1 and table2.
I cant get "order by" to work in this sql query..I use this query: "SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn"and I want to add this some where to get 12 random records: "ORDER BY NewID()"I tried this: "SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn ORDER BY NewID()"" but get the error:"ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified"I can´t figure out how I should write the query..Somebody have any ideas??/Radiwoi
table_a has patient_id, tran_id and other fields a,b,c table_b has patient_id,tran_id, key_id and other fileds d,e,f table_a patien_id + tran_id is unique table_b patient_id + tran_id is not unique, could be duplicated.
I have to create a query which will retrieve fields from table a a,b,c and fields d,e from table b where table a. patient_id + tran_id = tableb.patient_id + tran_id and table_b.key_id is the min key_id for that patient_id + tran_id.
I have a sp which requires a somewhat(at least for me) where clause. It needs a standard clause but then needs to differentiate the where based on whether a certain field is null or not. I didn't think an if would work but neither is my case. Below is the where clause. Thanks
where(OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RESTRICTION1 in ('Dental hold', 'Medical hold', 'Mental health hold') AND case when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is not null then OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@sdate AND OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO >= @edate when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is null OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@edate
ID GroupID User 1 101 Tom 2 101 Mark 3 101 Clark 4 102 Tom 5 102 Mark 6 103 Tom 7 103 Clark 8 104 Tom 9 104 Clark 10 105 Tom 11 105 Bred
the users of Group 101 are Tom,Mark,Clark the users of Group 102 are Tom,Mark the users of Group 103 are Tom,Clark the users of Group 104 are Tom,Clark the users of Group 105 are Tom,Bred
I want to show Tom that
Both You and Clark are together in 3 groups Both You and Mark are together in 2 groups Both You and Bred are together in 1 group
I might have to redesign the tables for this, but I'll ask anyway. I have a table with the following fields:
Email - VarChar Seminar - Int PeckingOrder - Int.
As I add addresses to the table, each one has a Seminar, and then each Seminar has a Pecking Order Value. If an email address shows up for more than one seminar, it can have multiple records. IE:
for address, seminar, and pecking order would be sample entries into the table. Give or Take 1000 records in the table at any given time. What I want to pull out is:
Distinct Email Addresses For each Email Address - The Max(PeckingOrder) And the Seminar that's associated with Max(PeckingOrder)
For the sample data set above, I'd want to see these two records returned by the query:
email1 - 1523 - 424 email2 - 1524 - 235
I can't seem to get the Having / Where clause right to pull those two records properly. Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks, --Daniel
Edited - Didn't realize the BB removed email addresses.
i want to write a query that takes any one specific person's schedule for an entire specific day, adds an arbitrary number of days to datStartTime, and finally inserts the PKSlotINDEX corresponding to the calcultated StartTime and fkPersonINDEX.
wow complicated isnt it...
the goal is to take the schedule of one day for one person and copy it to another day; i can scrap my current layout if necessary.
SELECT goto_last_name as 'Manager', advisor_name, advisor_ao_number as 'AO', COUNT (CASE advisor_termination_date WHEN '<Null>' THEN 1 END) as '#Advisors', SUM(Weekly_TOS_GDC) as 'TOS GDC' FROM weekly_condensed_tb WHERE advisor_platform_number = 1 AND report_date BETWEEN CAST(CONVERT(VARCHAR,'9/11/2007',112) AS DATETIME) -28 AND CAST(CONVERT(VARCHAR,'9/11/2007',112) AS DATETIME) GROUP BY goto_last_name,advisor_ao_number,advisor_name HAVING COUNT (CASE advisor_termination_date WHEN '<Null>' THEN 1 END) > 1
In the query above i select a range from the date - 28 days and do a sum on the TOS GDC column. What i am trying to do is have another query where the range will be - 56 and maybe - 86 so i get the SUMS for that as well. I need to display this in SQL Reporting Services and i can only have one DataSet returned otherwise i will not be able to bind it to one table.
How can i go about this so i return one set of data for 3 different date ranges.
Hey all, I have 3 tables: 1 table with Module information (1 quiz-like part of an Exam), 1 table with the relationships between Modules and Exams (ratios) and 1 table with User information, that contains the Exam number, Module number, and score. I am trying to get a full list of modules' names for 1 exam, and the user's score for those modules they taken. All this would pertain to 1 single Exam. I am only getting records returned for those modules that the user has taken; I want the full list with NULL values for the scores of modules the user has not taken. Hope that made sense, here is my attempt:
Code:
SELECT ExamModules.Name, ExamUsers.Score FROM ExamToModule LEFT OUTER JOIN ExamModules ON ExamToModule.ModuleID = ExamModules.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN ExamUsers ON ExamToModule.ModuleID = ExamUsers.MID AND ExamToModule.ExamID = ExamUsers.EID WHERE (ExamToModule.ExamID = 1) AND (ExamUsers.UserName = 'dizzle')
In this case the user is Dizzle and the Exam's ID (primary key) is 1. I've changed LEFT to RIGHT and FULL, they all return the same few records. Help?
I'm struggling with a syntax error in my sp. I'm hoping someone can give it a fresh look and straighten me out. Thanks. Background: 1. The innermost query (using the dynamic statements) will run fine on its own. 2. I can wrap that in another query (with the innermost as a DERIVEDTBL) and it will run fine UNLESS I apply the GROUP BY. Then I get syntax errors. 3. Also, the entire query runs fine as a view (with hard coded vals for column and value). 4. I don't know what kind of formatting this message will apply, so just know that I've checked my line truncations and they all include a trailing '+. Also, I know that Occured is misspelled. That is the correct object name. Not all our DB admins are lit majors.
