Hi,
I want to know which table my foreign is reference to
for instance I have this statement
ALTER TABLE BANK ADD CONSTRAINT BANKING_R_154 FOREIGN KEY (
COM_CODE ,
ACCOUNT_CODE ) references BANK_GLT
I want execute ine select * from information_schema.I_don't_know
to get the table BANK_GLT from constraint BANKING_R_154
How can I do this?
cheers,
Alessandro
I have created a SQL view of several tables, and need to add either a primary key or a constraint to this view. I need it for some full text indexing that will be performed on the view. How do I do it?
Thanks in advance :)
I want to create a check constraint on a table but the constraint values depend upon another table column as well, now one possible way is to create a function to check the column value. But I don’t want to use the function.
Can I do this in a view if so then how can I achieve this.
Hi All,
I have created a table using VIEWS in SQL server 2005, now i want to be ablle to edit it in a datagrid but i cannot do so as i there is no primary key!
now does anybody know how to set a primary key constraint so i can set one of the fields as a primary key to identify the row?
many thanks
Hi, all.
I am trying to create table with following SQL script:
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) constraint NN_Prj_Name not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
When I execute this script I get following error message:
Error source: SQL Server Compact ADO.NET Data Provider
Error message: Named Constraint is not supported for this type of constraint. [ Constraint Name = NN_Prj_Name ]
I looked in the SQL Server Books Online and saw following:
CREATE TABLE (SQL Server Compact)
...
< column_constraint > ::= [ CONSTRAINT constraint_name ] { [ NULL | NOT NULL ] | [ PRIMARY KEY | UNIQUE ] | REFERENCES ref_table [ ( ref_column ) ] [ ON DELETE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ] [ ON UPDATE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ]
As I understand according to documentation named constraints should be supported, however error message says opposite. I can rephrase SQL script by removing named constraint.
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
This script executes correctly, however I want named constraints and this does not satisfy me.
We are using SQL CE 3.5 on tablet PCs, that synchs with our host SQL 2005 Server using Microsoft Synchronization Services. On the tablets, when inserting a record, we get the following error:
A duplicate value cannot be inserted into a unique index. [ Table name = refRegTitle,Constraint name = PK_refRegTitle
But the only PK on this table is RegTitleID.
The table structure is:
[RegTitleID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[RegTitleNumber] [int] NOT NULL,
[RegTitleDescription] [varchar](200) NOT NULL,
[FacilityTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Active] [bit] NOT NULL,
The problem occurs when a Title Number is inserted and a record with that number already exists. There is no unique constraint on Title Number.
Has anyone else experienced this?
I am looking to create a constraint on a table that allows multiplenulls but all non-nulls must be unique.I found the following scripthttp://www.windowsitpro.com/Files/0.../Listing_01.txtthat works fine, but the following lineCREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX idx1 ON v_multinulls(a)appears to use indexed views. I have run this on a version of SQLStandard edition and this line works fine. I was of the understandingthat you could only create indexed views on SQL Enterprise Edition?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWrite a CREATE VIEW statement that defines a view named Invoice Basic that returns three columns: VendorName, InvoiceNumber, and InvoiceTotal. Then, write a SELECT statement that returns all of the columns in the view, sorted by VendorName, where the first letter of the vendor name is N, O, or P.
This is what I have so far,
CREATE VIEW InvoiceBasic AS
SELECT VendorName, InvoiceNumber, InvoiceTotal
From Vendors JOIN Invoices
ON Vendors.VendorID = Invoices.VendorID
[code]...
Hi guys 'n gals,
I created a query, which makes use of a temp table, and I need the results to be displayed in a View. Unfortunately, Views do not support temp tables, as far as I know, so I put my code in a stored procedure, with the hope I could call it from a View....
I tried:
CREATE VIEW [qryMyView]
AS
EXEC pr_MyProc
and unfortunately, it does not let this run.
Anybody able to help me out please?
Cheers!
I compared view query plan with query plan if I run the same statementfrom view definition and get different results. View plan is moreexpensive and runs longer. View contains 4 inner joins, statisticsupdated for all tables. Any ideas?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI had given one of our developers create view permissions, but he wants to also modify views that are not owned by him, they are owned by dbo.
I ran a profiler trace and determined that when he tries to modify a view using query designer in SQLem or right clicks in SQLem on the view and goes to properties, it is performing a ALTER VIEW. It does the same for dbo in a trace (an ALTER View). He gets a call failed and a permission error that he doesn't have create view permissions, object is owned by dbo, using both methods.
If it is doing an alter view how can I set permissions for that and why does it give a create view error when its really doing an alter view? Very confusing.
I have this view in SQL server:
CREATE VIEW dbo.vwFeat
AS
SELECT dbo.Lk_Feat.Descr, dbo.Lk_Feat.Price, dbo.Lk_Feat.Code, dbo.SubFeat.SubNmbr
FROM dbo.Lk_Feat INNER JOIN
dbo.SubFeat ON dbo.Lk_Feat.Idf = dbo.SubFeat.Idt
When ever I open using SQL Entreprise manager to edit it by adding or removing a field i inserts Expr1,2.. and I don t want that. The result I get is:
SELECT dbo.Lk_Feat.Descr AS Expr1, dbo.Lk_Feat.Price AS Expr2, dbo.Lk_Feat.Code AS Expr3, dbo.SubFeat.SubNmbr AS Expr4
FROM dbo.Lk_Feat INNER JOIN
dbo.SubFeat ON dbo.Lk_Feat.Idf = dbo.SubFeat.Idt
I don t want Entreprise manager to generate the Expr fields since I use the real fields in my application.
Thanks for help
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to do this.
For each row, only one out of two columns(id1,id2) should be populated. So if the id1 column is already populated and the application tries to fill in something for id2 then we just simply don't want to allow that and vice versa.
I am thinking triggers is the way to go. What do you think?
thanks
Rozina
using alter table syntax how can i insert the field TramingChoiceCd
Extend the constraint on NetwkChannel table UQ__TetwkChannel__50FB042B to include TramingChoiceCd
Which is the preferred method Rule, Check Constraint or Trigger?
I want to set a column to todays date when the column is = "T"
else when "F" set it to a future date. Each time there is a insertion into
the table.
I have a varchar field in a table.I want to restrict the entries in that field as "yes" or "no" nothing else.No record will be allowed for this field without yes or no.My question is is it possible without using any trigger for the table?I want to do it with the help of a constraint.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I see desing table option in enterprise manager of a table I don't see any constraints, but when I extract ddl I can see all 6 of them. They are all unique constraints not the check constraints. Is this normal. I am new to SQL Server and would appreciate some explanation.
Thanks
Hi, i want to put a contraint on a table which much check agains two values in the same column for the same member.
For example, i don't want a male to get information based on breast cancer, and i don't want a female to get information based on prostate cancer.
I have included some sample data. Just copy and paste.
Code Block
DECLARE @MemberLookupValues TABLE (OptionID INT, ValueID INT, Description VARCHAR(20))
INSERT @MemberLookupValues VALUES (3, 10, 'Male')
INSERT @MemberLookupValues VALUES (3, 11, 'Female')
INSERT @MemberLookupValues VALUES (7, 69, 'Prostate Cancer')
INSERT @MemberLookupValues VALUES (7, 70, 'Breast Cancer')
DECLARE @MemberValues TABLE (MemberID INT, OptionID INT, ValueID INT)
INSERT @MemberValues VALUES (1, 3, 10)
INSERT @MemberValues VALUES (1, 7, 69)
INSERT @MemberValues VALUES (1, 7, 70)
INSERT @MemberValues VALUES (2, 3, 11)
INSERT @MemberValues VALUES (2, 7, 69)
SELECT * FROM @MemberLookupValues
SELECT * FROM @MemberValues
I've highlighted the values that must be stopped.
So the basic check would be, IF OptionID = 3 AND ValueID = 10 then it must not allow you to insert the values OptionID = 7 AND ValueID = 70
I hope that makes sense.
Any help will be greatly appreciated, if you need any more informaiton then just ask,
Kind Regards
Carel Greaves
Hi I was wodering how to add an OR statment right in the Check Constraint expression.
This is what I am starting with in the database
([zip] like '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]')
and what I want well not exact but this would answer my question
([zip] like '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] || [A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]')
Thanks for any help
Is it possible to set an index of no duplicates on a column other than the primary key of a table? If yes, how is this done?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow can i implement delete constraint? i mean i don't want the rows of the primary key table to be deleted if they are used as foreign key in some other table. so i want to check if that PK is used as foreign key in other tables before deleting.
View 10 Replies View RelatedHi,I want to add unique contraint to EXISTING column in EXISTING table.I have ms sql 2005.How to do that?
View 7 Replies View Relatedhi, I want to implement a constraint on a talbe for two fields
phone numbers should b (###)###-####
and ss# should be ###-##-####
How can I create such constraint. I tried, but got an error message and could not save the table with the new changes.
Thanks
Ahmed
student --- enrollment is 1- to - many . ssn is pk in student. ssn and courseid is pk in enrollment. later I added the foreign key constraint FK_SSN in enrollment table reference student table. it is ok.
enrollment --- lessonhistory is 1-to -many, ssn, courseid and lessonid is pk in lessonhistory . I tried to set FK_SSN foreign key constraint in lessonhistory table reference enrollment table, it always show error message " no primary key in referewnce talbe enrollment "
I don't know how to fix it. could you help me out, thanks!!
Can somebody tell me about on delete constraint and where should it be used - table having foriegn key?
coz want i want is- the moment i delete the data from the table whose primary key is been referenced as foreign key , The Data in all the tables where its primary key is beeen used as forein key should be deleted.
:confused:
Does anyone have any Idea on how I could enforce a unique constrait across multiple tables?
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy company does medical billing for several clients. Each client may have a contract with several insurance companies (Payors) for rates for different procedures. I have a table named FeeSchedule with four (relevant) columns: Client, CPTCode (procedure code), Payor, and Fee.
Some Payors don't really negotiate, and have the same FeeSchedule for all clients. I know the right way to track that is have a separate set of records for each client, even for payors like medicare where every client will have the same set of records. However, the data-entry burden for populating that table would be very large, and I would like to use be able to have use a NULL client like a wildcard.
The problem is I then can't use client as part of the key, and I need to be able to restrict it so that if I have a NULL client for a specific CPT and Payor and I can't also have a another Client for that CPT and Payor.
Any ideas how to accomplish this or the equivalent functionality?
Hi everybody
we have the following tables
1)
Country
Countryid CountyNAme
INIndia
MYMalaysia
UKUnitedKingdom
here Countryid is the primary key.
2) MainDept
DeptID Deptname Countryid
CMCashManagementIN
CBConsumerBankingMY
CSCustomer SupportIN
IBInternetBankIN
here deptid is the primary key
3) UserMaster
Uid Uname Deptid Countryid
001 Chris CMIN
002 Raja CSIN
003 Ram CBMY
here Uid is the primary key.
The problem is when i change the countryid from one country to another for a deptname.
THe change is not reflected in the usermaster table as it still shows the previous countryid.
For eg. user Chris belongs to dept Cash management which is situated in india.
Now if i change in mainDept table the cash management from india(IN) to say malaysia(MY).the corresponding change is not reflected in usermaster table.it still shows india. So when i query for chris in usermaster i get an error
as i am searching in india for cash mangement.
i tried using on update cascade but here it did not work as i have to make DeptID & countryID in MainDept table as composite key & use Deptid & countryid in usermaster as refernce key.
Since i have 20-25 tables also referencing the above 2 tables i have to set reference key in all these tables & these tables are in turn referenced elsewhere in other tables. Thus i end up creating a large no. of composite keys.
IS there any other way to solve this problem?
note : In sqlserver we can give on update cascade still it has the above problem
but in Oracle on update cascade is not possible
Can anybody suggest a solution for this in both sql server and in oracle
Thanks u verymuch
I am having problem to find the right syntax to DROP a column with contrainst and recrate it
I get an error
if exists ( select * from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
where TABLE_NAME='myTable'
and COLUMN_NAME='myDate' )
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[myTable] DROP COLUMN myDate
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[myTable] WITH NOCHECK ADD
myDate datetime CONSTRAINT [DF_myDate] DEFAULT (GetDate())
GO
Query Analyser says :
Server: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 5
The object 'DF_myDate' is dependent on column 'myDate'.
Server: Msg 4922, Level 16, State 1, Line 5
ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN myDate failed because one or more objects access this column.
Server: Msg 2705, Level 16, State 4, Line 2
Column names in each table must be unique. Column name 'myDate' in table 'dbo.myTable' is specified more than once.
thank you for helping
Hi all:
Just joined forums, so a big hello to you all :)
Just wondering if someone could explain the following two terms too me?
*Semantic Constraint
*Access Control
Are there limitations each can impose within a relational database?
Many thanks
Olly :D
Hello, I have hit the wall here...can't make sense of this one.
I have a script that creates a PRIMARY KEY constraint called PK_tblDRG
CODE:
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblDRG]
ALTER COLUMN [record_id] Uniqueidentifier NOT NULL
Go
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblDRG]
WITH NOCHECK ADD PK_tblDRG PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[record_id]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
All is fine with that. I run this to verify:
EXEC sp_pkeys @table_name = 'tblDRG'
,@table_owner = 'dbo' ,@table_qualifier = 'Relational_05Q3'
which returns this:
TABLE_QUALIFIERTABLE_OWNERTABLE_NAMECOLUMN_NAMEKEY_SEQPK_NAME
Relational_05Q3dbotblDRGrecord_id1PK_tblDRG
Now I want to drop the constriant if it exists:
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[PK__tblDRG]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsPrimaryKey') = 1)
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblDRG] DROP CONSTRAINT PK__tblDRG
AND I get this in return:
The command(s) completed successfully.
So, lets double check:
EXEC sp_pkeys @table_name = 'tblDRG'
,@table_owner = 'dbo' ,@table_qualifier = 'Relational_05Q3'
AND I STILL GET THIS:
TABLE_QUALIFIERTABLE_OWNERTABLE_NAMECOLUMN_NAMEKEY_SEQPK_NAME
Relational_05Q3dbotblDRGrecord_id1PK_tblDRG
Hmmmmm. Looks like the IF statement didn't do it's job. Ok fine. I'll just kill it myself:
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblDRG] DROP CONSTRAINT PK__tblDRG
AND I GET THIS?!?!?!?!
Server: Msg 3728, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
'PK__tblDRG' is not a constraint.
What am I not getting here? Is it me...I can take If I am a bone head here.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Suppose I have a table called "Languages" with two fields. One field is an Identity field that acts as the Primary Key. The second field is "LanguageName" which would naturally be "English", "Spanish", etc. What I want to do is put a constraint on the LanguageName field so that someone cannot enter the same name twice.Is it better to create an Index --> Create UNIQUE and use:a) Constraint?b) Index with Ignore duplicate key checked?Is there any benefit of one over the other for my purpose? Thanks.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHmm,
I'm creating a table that contains information from two other tables. I'd like to have a constraint on some columns so that thay can only contain information that exists in the other two tables. This is what I got:
create table dbo.KUSE_Bills
(
SERVICE_ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL primary key,
BILLDATE datetime NOT NULL,
CNAME varchar(100) NOT NULL,
SNAME varchar(100) NOT NULL,
PRICE money NOT NULL,
UNIT varchar(50) NOT NULL,
NUMBER integer NOT NULL,
BILLSUM money NOT NULL
)
GO
I tried something like this:
create table dbo.KUSE_Bills
(
SERVICE_ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL primary key,
BILLDATE datetime NOT NULL,
CNAME varchar(100) NOT NULL,
SNAME varchar(100) NOT NULL,
PRICE money NOT NULL,
UNIT varchar(50) NOT NULL,
NUMBER integer NOT NULL,
BILLSUM money NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT chk_cname CHECK (CNAME NOT IN (
SELECT CNAME FROM KUSE_Customer))
)
GO
But subqueries are not allowed...
So how can I do it?