I am very new to the whole sql replication, i am trying to replicate with 2x 2000sql std machines
One is to be the distrubuter and the publisher (merge type by the way) the other to be the subscriber.
I have downloaded and followed step by steps religiously however i have nothing but isses with this. I have used the wizards i am getting various errors.
the merge client comes up with an error after looking in the event view i find i have the following error
Event Type: Information
Event Source: SQLSERVERAGENT
Event Category: Job Engine
Event ID: 203
Date: 8/01/2007
Time: 12:52:17 PM
User: N/A
Computer: FAILOVERSQL2000
Description:
SubSystem Message - Job 'FAILOVERSQL2000-PTO-PTO-ELCOM-TEST-1' (0x96AD1DBC3E5A9541A6C72C4CCFBF5AED), step 2 - The schema script '\FAILOVERSQL2000ReplDatauncFAILOVERSQL2000_PTO_PTO0108120754forums_AddUserToRole_5110.sch' could not be propagated to the subscriber.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
I'm new to replication and set up a Snapshot Replication on the tables in my sample database. Â Everything seemed to work (database created on Subscriber instance, jobs set up, etc) but the articles (tables) are not being created in the subscriber's database. Â
I can see the files created in the folder but I don't see the tables or the data. Â Also, I confirmed that the articles are checked so they should be included.
I'm trying to test merge replication, but am unable to create the publication, the snapshot agent keeps failing. The error I get from replication monitor is "Script failed for Table <tablename>"
Our database has quite a few XML datatype columns, when I take out the xml columns the snapshot succeeds OK, but fails with the xml column.
I created a simple table containing a varchar column and xml column. I created this table in our database, and in Adventure Works. Was able to create a publication with this test table in the adventureworks database, but was unable to create publication with this table in our database. The snapshot failed with error "Script failed for table testtable". I removed the xml column on the test table in our database and was able to create the publication successfully. Creating a publication in the adventureworks database with an xml column has no problems, but does in our database.
I am at my wits end here. For Replication the Books Online clearly state:
"The option to allow transformations is set at the time you create a publication"
However, I cannot find any options that allow me to do this in the Create Publication Wizard.
Once the Publication has been created I see in the Properties in the Subscription Options tab that "Use DTS to transform data before distributing it to a Subscriber" is set to No and there is no way to change it.
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
This article cannot use the 'subscriber_upload_options' feature because the publication compatibility level is less than 90. Use sp_changemergepublication to set the publication_compatibility_level of publication 'testMR' to '90RTM'. Changed database context to 'test'. Publication 'testMR' has the following property: 'compensate_for_errors'. SQL Server subscribers below version '8.00.0858' will ignore this setting. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 21522)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.1399&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=21522&LinkId=20476
I have created my production server as a distributor and a publication on that server. On my backup server I have created a pull subscription. After that I have generated SQL scripts on my backup server so I can create the pull subscription anytime.
To test my script I used sp_removedbreplication 'dbname' to remove replication on the backup server. I then used the generated SQL script to create the pull subscription again. I got this error message
Job 'ProdServName_DBName-BackServName-DBName401A48AE-D8DC-4F29-A610-13916370CD0B' started successfully. Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_addsubscription, Line 135 Invalid object name 'syspublications'.
What does this Error message mean and what can I do about it?
i have setup default transactional replication using locat distributor scheme. I need to create triggers on tables at subscriber side. Can this be done using transaction replication?
I am running MS SQL Server 7 with SP3 installed and am having some problems getting replication to work correctly. I want to replicate all tables from one database to another database on the same server. I can setup replication, add publications and add subscriptions without any problem and all goes well until the replication process starts when the job aborts because it cannot find the sp_MSins..., sp_MSupd... or the sp_MSdel... stored procedures. I have used the New Publication wizard to create a Transactional publication, published all tables and allowed the wizard to use the default stored procedures which it says will be created when the subscribers are initialized but although I have created push subcriptions the stored procedures are never created and hence the replication fails whenever the job runs.
I have SA access to the databases concerned and as far as I am aware the jobs are running as my login - can anybody help me out as this is beginning to drive me nuts.
I am developing a application where the database needs to be deployed from the central database server which is sql server 2005, and we have only few fields and few new tables which need to be deployed into pocket pc using sql mobile from sql server 2005. We would like to design the database in sql server 2005 for mobile, which will be only structure and will be deployed into PDA using web service.
We have a situation exactly like that shown in the documentation for creating a peer-to-peer merge replication. That is, we have three servers, one each in Chicago, New York, and Bermuda. Users in each office will read and write to their respective servers and the servers will then replicate with one another. The documentation, however, only shows how to set up peer-to-peer for a transactional replication. The problem is that the various Manger Studio options and the database stored procedures are NOT the same between transactional and merge replication and on the face of it, merged replication does not support a peer-to-peer topology. Can somebody walk me through the process of creating a peer-to-peer merge replication, or else convince me that I should go with transaction with updating subscriptions -- in contravention of what the documentation seems to reccommend? I'd really appreciate it! Thanks. Randy
I'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.
Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.
In my production box is running on SQL7.0 with Merge replication and i want add one more table and i want add one more column existing replication table. Any body guide me how to add .This is very urgent Regards Don
DBCC OPENTRAN shows "REPLICATION" on a server that is not configured for replication. The transaction log is almost as large as the database (40GB) with a Simple recovery model. I would like to find out how the log can be truncated in such a situation.
Hello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm
I have a VB.net app that access a SQL Express database. I have transactional repliaction set up on a SQL 2000 database (the publisher) and a pull subscription from the VB.net app. I use RMO in the VB app to connect to the publisher. My problem is I am getting some strange behaviour as follows
- if I run the app and invoke the pull subscription it works fine. If I then close my app and go back in, I can access my data without any problem
- If I run the app and try to access data in my SQL Express database it works fine. I can then close the app, reopen it and run the pull subscription it works fine
however.......
- if I run the app, invoke the pull subscription (which runs fine), and then try to access data in my local SQL Express database without firstly closing and reopening the app, I get a login error
- if I run the app, try to access data in my local SQL Express database (which works fine), and then try to run the pull subscription I get a "the process cannot acces the file as it is being used by another process" error. In this case I need to restart the SQL Express service to be able to run replication again.
I get exactly the same behaviour when I use the Windows Sync tool (with my app open at the same time) instead of my RMO code to replicate the data.
I am using standard ADO.Net 2 code to access my SQL Express data in the app and closing all connections etc
I have recently setup a transactional replication in MS SQL 2000. After setting up the replication the clients TempDB grew by almost 60GB. Now the client is Blaming me for the TempDB GROWTH and saying that its because of the replication being setup i tried to convince them but they are not satisfied yet. Can anybody please tell me does replication cause the tempdb to grow. If yes then how. can u suggest any good link for getting to know the internal working of SQL Server replication????
I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.
I have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication. Â I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS. Â I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication. Â SQL-P (publisher),Â
SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber). Â Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.
Hello everyone,I am involved in a scenario where there is a huge (SQL Server 2005)production database containing tables that are updated multiple timesper second. End-user reports need to be generated against the data inthis database, and so the powers-that-be came to the conclusion that areporting database is necessary in order to offload report processingfrom production; of course, this means that data will have to bereplicated to the reporting database. However, we do not need all ofthe data in the production database, and perhaps a filtering criteriacan be established where only certain rows are replicated over to thereporting database as they're inserted (and possibly updated/deleted).The current though process is that the programmers designing thequeries/reports will know exactly what data they need from productionand be able to modify the replication criteria as needed. For example,programmer A might write a report where the data he needs can beexpressed in a simple replication criteria for table T where column X= "WOOD" and column Y = "MAHOGANY". Programmer B might come along amonth later and write a report whose relies on the same table T wherecolumn X = "METAL" and column Z in (12, 24, 36). Programmer B willhave to modify Programmer A's replication criteria in such a way as toaccomodate both reports, in this case something like "Copy rows fromtable T where (col X = "WOOD" and col Y = "MAHOGANY") or (col X ="METAL" and col Z in (12, 24, 36))". The example I gave is reallytrivial of course but is sufficient to give you an idea of what thecurrent thought-process is.I assume that this is a requirement that many of you may haveencountered in the past and I am wondering what solutions you wereable to come up with. Personally, I believe that the above method isprone to error (in this case the use of triggers to specifyreplication criteria) and I'd much rather use replication services tocopy tables in their entirety. However, this does not seem to be anoption in my case due to the sheer size of certain tables. Is thereanything out there that performs replication based on complexprogrammer defined criteria? Are triggers a viable alternative? Anyalternative out-of-the-box solutions?Any feedback would be appreciated.Regards!Anthony
I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example... Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
I have a wired situation..!I set up transactional replication on one of my development server (SQL2000 Dev Edition with sp4).It is running fine without any issues and all of a sudden, i noticed inmy repication monitor tab under Publisher where I usually see thepublication is empty now.I do see the snapshot agent, log reader and distribution agent under myagents inside the replication Monitor. But its usefull to see all 3agents in one window under publisher before. What happend? Is there anyway to get that inside that monitor? Has someone encountered thissitation before? Please advise....After that I tried to create a new set of replication on differentdatabase on the same server and i dont see those either underReplication Monitor - Publishers....All it says is (No Items)....I would appreciate any help to correct this issue... Thanks in advance..
I have setup transactional replication everything on one box. later(two or three weeks later), Replication monitor is show red X Under my publishers (publications is disconnected). this is SQL2005.
I have a SQL Server in an internal network and need to "replicate" to an identical server and database in a DMZ. The DMZ can only receive files sent by a custom component and no port(s) can be opened in the firewall or standard FTP used.
I also need to minimise traffic (i.e. sending whole tables is not an issue as some contain millions of rows), replicate approx once hourly and allow record locking only (as opposed to DB locking/exclsuive access or table locking).
Any thoughts / experiences greatly appreciated otherwise I'm looking at putting triggers on all the tables to monitor changes and generate SQL statements for execution against the DMZ server.
I'm interested in combining the Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication and Standard Transactional Replication to provide a scale out solution of SQL Server 2005. The condition is as follows:
We may have 10 SQL Server 2005 (1 Publisher + 9 Subscriber) running transactional replication in the production environment and allow updates in subscribers. To offload the loading of the publisher, we plan to have 2 Publisher (PubNode1 and PubNode2) using Peer-to-Peer Transaction Replication and the rest 8 subscribers will be divided into 2 groups. The subscribers 1-4 (SubNode1, SubNode2, SubNode3, and SubNode4) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode1, and the rest 4 subscribers (SubNode5, ..., SubNode8) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode2.
Is it possible to setup above 2 Publisher + 8 Subscriber topology? Also, could we set the 8 subscribers with updatable subscriptions to achieve each node is updatable?
We do not plan to set all the 10 nodes using Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication as it is necessary to make sure n*(n-1)/2 (i.e. 45) peer-to-peer connections is reliable. It seems that the maintenance cost is high if the servers are not in a LAN and the topology is very high coupling. So we prefer to divide the 10 nodes into 2 groups and reduce the cost of each node to maintain the connections to all other sites.
Hi,I have a User Defined Datatype, which I want to use to define anotherdata-type. I tried the obvious:EXEC sp_addtype@typename = UDT_OBJECT_ID,@phystype = 'NUMERIC (5)',@nulltype = 'NULL'GOEXEC sp_addtype@typename = UDT_TRACKING_NUM,@phystype = UDT_OBJECT_ID,@nulltype = 'NOT NULL'GObut that didn't work :Msg 15036, Level 16, State 1, Server SKINNER, Procedure sp_addtype, Line 186The data type UDT_OBJECT_ID does not exist.Has anyone done this before,Thanks,Rowland.
1) We have given our clients the option to create a scheduled job for a future date. When this occurs, the jobID, the new action for the job, and the future date is inserted into a table aptly called 'Scheduling'. What we are hoping SQL Server can do is the following:
Query the 'Scheduling' table based on the current date to see if there are any jobs that need their actions updated. If ( 1 ) returns a recordset, update the job's action in the 'Jobs' table with the new action Delete the rows that were queried and updated from the 'Scheduling' table
I am assuming I can do this using the schedule Jobs (excuse the irony) in SQL Server Management. Is this true?
2) I having been playing with TSQL to do the previous mentioned. My other question is how can I query the database using the current date? For example, the date in the database is entered as "mm/dd/yyyy" and I can query it using the following: SELECT * FROM Scheduling WHERE Date='6/30/2006', which will return the recordsets that I desire. If I can schedule SQL Server to do this, then how will I query it based on today's date? SELECT * FROM Scheduling WHERE Date="today's date". I tried the function GETDATE(), but that didn't seem to work. Any ideas?
I am using VB .NET 2003 with SQL Server Express 2005. I am writing a program that creates a new database each time it is ran (through "Test_My_Connection" Sub below). On my development PC I am able to create a database on the fly using the code below without any issue:
Once I deploy to any computer I get the following error on the Create_DB_File below: "An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file c:Program FilesCommon FilesIdeasmyTestDB.mdf failed. As database with that name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share."
I can create any database file I want with this code on my design PC, as long as it is in the "c:program filescommon filesideas" directory, if I move the directory I get the error on my design PC also. Do I need to register the directory I am using as a data directory to allow my PC or deployment computers to create databases? I don't know how I got it to work in the "common files" directory for my development PC but it does. Any thoughts? Code is below, with connection string...
Thanks,
Brian
'This will be run each time a new project is started Private Sub Test_My_Connection
Dim myProjName as String ="myTestDB" myOutDB_cls = New OutputDBCls(retMsg) If retMsg <> "SUCCESS" then
'Deal with it End If
'Database files to be created by "Create_DB_File" Sub
I need to convert the following .NET code to a SQL Server 2005 user defined function. Let me know where to start
Here is the code in ASP.NET using VB
Shared Function GetDigest(ByVal tamperProofParams As String) As String Dim Digest As String = String.Empty Dim input As String = String.Concat(SecretSalt, tamperProofParams, SecretSalt)
'The array of bytes that will contain the encrypted value of input Dim hashedDataBytes As Byte()
'The encoder class used to convert strPlainText to an array of bytes Dim encoder As New System.Text.UTF8Encoding
'Create an instance of the MD5CryptoServiceProvider class Dim md5Hasher As New System.Security.Cryptography.MD5CryptoServiceProvider
'Call ComputeHash, passing in the plain-text string as an array of bytes 'The return value is the encrypted value, as an array of bytes hashedDataBytes = md5Hasher.ComputeHash(encoder.GetBytes(input))
'Base-64 Encode the results and strip off ending '==', if it exists Digest = Convert.ToBase64String(hashedDataBytes).TrimEnd("=".ToCharArray())
;WITH cte AS ( SELECT SYMBOL, [Time], Price, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY CONVERT(CHAR(5), CAST(Time AS DATETIME), 114) ORDER BY CAST(Time AS DATETIME) ASC) AS rn_1, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY CONVERT(CHAR(5), CAST(Time AS DATETIME), 114) ORDER BY CAST(Time AS DATETIME) DESC) AS rn_2 FROM Table1 WHERE SYMBOL='EUR A0-FX' )
SELECT SYMBOL='EUR A0-FX',CONVERT(CHAR(5), CAST(Time AS DATETIME), 114) AS [Time],MAX(CASE WHEN rn_2 = 1 THEN Price ELSE NULL END) AS [Close] FROM cte
GROUP BY CONVERT(CHAR(5), CAST(Time AS DATETIME), 114) ORDER BY CAST(CONVERT(CHAR(5), CAST(Time AS DATETIME), 114) AS DATETIME);
This code is for finding Average of Previous 5 CLOSE values. I want to add this query into my Stored Procedure. I am getting Error if I create another CTE.
select a.symbol,a.TIME,a.CLOSE,avg(b.CLOSE1) as average, CASE WHEN A.CLOSE>AVG(B.CLOSE) THEN 'BUY' ELSE 'SELL' END AS ACTION
from cte as a inner join cte as b on b.rn between a.rn - 5 and a.rn - 1
