Hi all
i have setup default transactional replication using locat distributor scheme. I need to create triggers on tables at subscriber side. Can this be done using transaction replication?
Thanks,
Arslan.
Hi,
I am trying to setup bi-directional transactional replication between 2 SQL Servers,
I add the subscription on both the servers using the code below.
EXEC sp_addsubscription @publication = N'test',
@article = N'all', @subscriber = 'AnyServer',
@destination_db = N'test', @sync_type = N'none',
@status = N'active', @update_mode = N'read only',
@loopback_detection = 'true'
GO
I have defined 'AnyServer' on both the servers using cliconfg
(Server1's AnyServer pointed towards Server2 and Server2's AnyServer pointed towards Server1, I need to do that because there is a restriction to run the same code on both the servers),
After inserting a record on server1 in the 'test' database, the changes successfully transfers to the server2, then server2 sends it back to server1 and server1 generates the error of
"Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_Table1'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'Table1'."
It seems as if loop detection is failing if I keep the same subscriber name on both sides.
It runs fine when I change the subscriber name in the subscription (@subscriber = 'Server2' for server1 and @subscriber = 'Server1' for server2).
Can anybody explains this behavior to me?
Hi,
I am trying to setup mirrored subcriber in Transactional Replication in SQL 2005. I am not able to do so as it don't work after failover.However I am able to setup mirrored publisher with distribution property "PublisherFailoverPartner" for snapshot and log reader agent profiles and it works even after failover.
However I need to know, do we have something called "Subscriberfailoverproperty" or any other method to set up mirrored subscriber in Transactional Replication in SQL 2005.
Thanks
Kiran Patil
Greetings All, I was hoping that a replication sage might be able toanswer a question for me.I want to have one subscriber subscribing to N publishers. Iessentially have a company that has a main headquarters and threesatellite offices. I want each of the satellite offices to push theirdata up to the master database. From what I have read it seems likethis should not be a problem. Some questions that come to mind are:1.)Does the master need to be read only or can it be configured to beupdateable as well?2.)Can the distribution agent on all the publishers be set tocontinuously distribute or should it be staggered so as not to cause aproblem when another distribution agent is running?3.)If the distribution is set to "delay distribution" will this causechanges on the subscriber to be pushed out to the publishers?In this database guid's are used as pk's so the issue of pk collisionsis not a problem.I hope that this question is not too vague. My experience thus farwith replication has been simple one way transactional and simplemerge replication.Regards, Louis Frolio
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi!
The distributor was down for a long time (neer the week) and after that the commands stop applying to subscriber, while they successfully collected from publisher and stored into distributor.
Replication agent on distributor reports that initial snapshot is not available. It seems subscription is expired. But all commands from the point distributor down I have. How can I make distr agent to resume activity without reinitialize snapshot?
Hi
I need to setup transactional replication for a production server.
The tables (articles) at publisher being replicated can expect schema changes.
Is there any way to reflect schema changes at subscriber using transactional replication.
Early Thanks,
Salman Shehbaz.
Any experience of success or failure setting up CDC on the subscriber end of transactional replication?
Also for a bonus answer, why are explicit index operations not permitted (I'm assuming this is even on the publisher?) From BOL:
• Explicitly adding, dropping, or altering indexes is not supported. Indexes created implicitly for constraints (such as a primary key constraint) are supported.
I have taken over a transactional replication setup that is being usedfor fault tolerance (I know, I know...).The scenario I am concerned with is where the publisher goes down due tofailure, so we need to point our application at the subscriber and startupdating the data there. We are not using the immediate updating option.How do I go about re-syncing the publisher with the data that been addedto, or changed on the subscriber, when the publisher comes back online?Thanks,TGru*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a primary and secondary servers both running Windows 2000 SP3 with SQL 2000 SP3. I have set up transactional replication with the primary server as publisher and the secondary server has the distributor and subscriber DB. I am testing the scenerio where my primary server goes down and I have to make updates to the secondary server until my primary server comes back up. I am able to update my subscriber database and the transactions go into the MSreplication_queue table to be pushed back to the primary when it comes back up. When I bring the primary server back up and start the queue agent job it starts pushing the transactions over and then stops after 4 or 5 transactions with the error "Failed while applying queued message to publisher". I have attached part of the log file for the agent below
dbserver2.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getsqlqueueversion (?, ?, ?, ?)}
dbserver2.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_replsqlqgetrows (N'DBSERVER', N'Old_Processing', N'Old_Processing')}
[4/15/2004 3:59:47 PM]dbserver2.distribution: exec dbo.sp_helpdistpublisher @publisher = N'DBSERVER'
Connecting to DBSERVER 'DBSERVER.Old_Processing'
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 21)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_ins_IQ2KProcSystem_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1>
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 15)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_ins_NightlyProcess_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', '2004-04-15 15:56:44.623000000', 'Begin ProcessIQ2KSystem', 'AB14E5D7-C81D-4A39-A8F5-51F1C48227B0', '17E5D98F-EDF0-41D0-9991-97511B850720', 1>
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_upd_IQ2KProcSystem_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1>
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 7)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_upd_TheatreProcess_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', 1, '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1, NULL, '79A114D6-FF31-4E37-AC2D-90C0A0114F40', '072175', 1, '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 0, NULL, 'AF61A098-44A3-45D7-B25B-E8EA9CD464A1', 0x2800, 1>
Failed while applying queued message to publisher
Disconnecting from DBSERVER 'DBSERVER'
Worker Thread 692 : Task Failed
Disconnecting from dbserver2 'dbserver2'
Processed 3 queued trans, 3 cmds, 0 conflicts
Queue Reader aborting
In the sql server logs I am getting this message:
Replication-Replication Transaction Queue Reader Subsystem: agent Repl Queue Reader failed. Failed while applying queued message to publisher.
Error: 14151, Severity: 18, State: 1
Any help would be greatly appreciated
We have a database which is (a subset of tables are) replicated to another via transactional replication. Whilst most changes made at the published database reach the subscriber within a matter of seconds, we have a SQL Agent job which performs a calculation in the published database and then immediately exports data from the subscriber using log shipping. The result is that the calculated changes do not make it through to the exported transaction logs in time.
Is there a way to manually "refresh" the subscriber databases using T-SQL?
I am getting the error The transaction log for database 'ReplicationDB' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'.log_reuse_wait_desc from sys.databases is showing logbackup
The database is subscribed database. We configured transactional replication. But the transactional replication is getting errors and failed. Is there relation b/n this replication failures and log growth in subscriber db?
Hello,
Are there any requirements that dictate the SQL Server version for the distribution agent for a SQL 2000 publisher with a transactional push subscription to a SQL 2005 subscriber?
Thanks in advance,
John
I have a transactional replication environment that creates subscribers on another server as a staging area for an ETL process to a data warehouse application on a 3rd server which is the report repository. Currently the ETL process runs every 10 minutes and performs it's function across approx 150+ subscriber databases and consolidates it to the data warehouse.
I have an SLA of 2 minutes. I'd like to rework the ETL process (which run as SSIS job at the moment) to be specific to a single database and fire that one ETL proces when changes have been applied to that subscriber database only. Of these 150+ databases generally only about 8-10 are updating the subscriber at any given time per Repl Monitor. I'm thinking that if I only have a few transactions to apply to a single db the ETL would run in seconds dynamically as the subscriber is update.
The issue is how to fire the ETL process upon completion of updates to the subscriber DB? I'm thinking of using SP_Start_job passing the DBID to update the warehouse but unsure whether this is possible but if so where to trigger it.
I am working to create a phone list that will contain Last Name, First Name, and Phone Number sorted by last name. For printing purposes I would like to have three columns of data instead of the standard of one column.
Is it possible to create a query to present data in three columns showing the data side by side?
I am trying to migrate from my current system, where I do merge replication from Windows Mobile devices running SQL Server CE 2.0 to a central database running SQL Server 2000 sp3a. I want eventually to move to a system running SQL Server 2005 CE replicating to a SQL Server 2005 back-end. But the transition will need to be gradual, and I may have to support both systems for a while until I can convert all clients from the old system to the new. I also need to do thorough testing.
So ... I'm trying to set up a test environment giving me the maximum possible flexibility to do my testing. Ideally, I'd like to set up SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 on a side-by-side basis, in a manner that would potentially allow mobile devices running both SQL Server CE 2.0 and SQL Server 2005 CE to sync with either back-end server.
Can someone provide me with guidance as what is possible to set up here? I know that SQL Server 2000 and 2005 can be installed side-by-side on the same server. It also appears that you can set up SQL Server 2000 so that EITHER SQL Server CE 2.0 OR SQL Server 2005 CE can sync with SQL Server 2000 (see www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/sqlmobile/connectivity-tools.mspx), but I don't know if it's possible for BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 AND SQL Server 2005 CE to sync to the same SQL Server 2000. As for SQL Server 2005 ... it appears to be possible to set up SQL Server 2005 so that BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 devices AND SQL Server 2005 CE devices can sync to the same SQL Server 2005 (see web page cited above). However, I don't know if it's possible to set up a SQL Server 2005 server installation in this manner while at the same time having a side-by-side SQL Server 2000 installation supporting any level of mobile merge replication.
HELP!!!!
in merge replication using sql server 2005 and sql server compact, is it possible to have triggers (or business logic) for any changes on the client side? how does a client app know an insert/update/delete has been made? also, if the article is set to download-only, can the client app also be nofied of any changes?
thanks,
bryan
I created a snapshot replication and after the first replication process i didn't find the triggers and constraints on the subscription side. what happened ? did i do anything in bad or i can't replicate this objects? This necessary for me because i need to create a testdatabase about the production environment - periodically.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello,
I'm interested in combining the Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication and Standard Transactional Replication to provide a scale out solution of SQL Server 2005. The condition is as follows:
We may have 10 SQL Server 2005 (1 Publisher + 9 Subscriber) running transactional replication in the production environment and allow updates in subscribers. To offload the loading of the publisher, we plan to have 2 Publisher (PubNode1 and PubNode2) using Peer-to-Peer Transaction Replication and the rest 8 subscribers will be divided into 2 groups. The subscribers 1-4 (SubNode1, SubNode2, SubNode3, and SubNode4) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode1, and the rest 4 subscribers (SubNode5, ..., SubNode8) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode2.
Is it possible to setup above 2 Publisher + 8 Subscriber topology?
Also, could we set the 8 subscribers with updatable subscriptions to achieve each node is updatable?
We do not plan to set all the 10 nodes using Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication as it is necessary to make sure n*(n-1)/2 (i.e. 45) peer-to-peer connections is reliable. It seems that the maintenance cost is high if the servers are not in a LAN and the topology is very high coupling. So we prefer to divide the 10 nodes into 2 groups and reduce the cost of each node to maintain the connections to all other sites.
That's the scenario.
Any feedback is welcome and appreciated.
Thanks,
Terence
Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication. Â I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS. Â I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication. Â SQL-P (publisher),Â
SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber). Â Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.
Hi,
I'm creating a new transactional publication and when the process begins to add articles i got the follow error:
Messages
* SQL Server Management Studio could not create article 'Tbl_Menu'. (New Publication Wizard)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Automatic identity range support is useful only for publications that allow updating subscribers.
Changed database context to 'sodimprumde4'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 21231)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=21231&LinkId=20476
Thanks for any help, If anyone know how to resolve this problem.
I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
thanks...
SQL Server 7.0 SP3
I am using the "Pull Subscription Wizard" to set up merge replication. I go through all the steps of the wizard and then I hit "Finish" at the end. When it gets to the third step (Creating the Subscription), I get the old:
__________________________________________________ _________
mmc.exe has generated errors and will by closed by Windows.
You will need to restart the program.
An error log is being created.
__________________________________________________ _________
This happens whether I try to do this from my PC or from the actual server I am creating the subscription on.
Has anyone else had this issue? Is there a hotfix I need?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Craig
Hi all!
I hope anyone here can help me with this tough problem:
I have a replication enviroment with several subscribers.
Publisher:MSSQL 2000, SP3
Subscribers: MSSQL200, SP3 and MSDE2000, SP3
Since a few weeks, one of the subscribers fails when
synchronizing with the message
"This process could not enumerate changes at the subscriber"
The erroroutput with verboselevel 3 doesn't help me much, I
append it to the end of this posting. (unfortunately german)
I heard that this error can be caused by a "blank" in an image
column or different Service Pack Versions - definitely not
possible in this case!
The only strange detail is that the SQL Server Versionnumber
of this MSDE shown via EM is not the same as the number shown
in controlpanel->software. By the way, is it ok that here are
two lines for the MSDE?
SP3 is definitely installed on all machines!
Any help would be greatly appreciated - i'm already losing hope...
Best Regards, Gert
Microsoft SQL Server-Merge-Agent 7.00.623
Copyright (c) 1998 Microsoft Corporation
Percent Complete: 0
Verbindung mit Abonnent 'MyServerAT074'
Connecting to Abonnent 'MyServerAT074.MyDB'
MyServerAT074.MyDB: {call sp_MSgetversion }
Percent Complete: 0
Verbindung mit Verteiler 'MyServer1s'
Connecting to Verteiler 'MyServer1s.'
MyServer1s.: {call sp_MSgetversion }
MyServer1s.: {call sp_helpdistpublisher (N'MyServer1s') }
MyServer1s.distribution: select datasource, srvid from master..sysservers
where srvname = N'MyServer1s'
MyServer1s.distribution: select datasource, srvid from master..sysservers
where srvname = N'MyServerAT074'
MyServer1s.distribution: {call sp_MShelp_merge_agentid (0, N'MyDB',
N'MyDB', 9, N'MyDB')}
Percent Complete: 0
Initialisiert
MyServer1s.distribution: {call sp_MShelp_profile (19, 4, N'')}
Percent Complete: 1
Verbindung mit Verleger 'MyServer1s'
Connecting to Verleger 'MyServer1s.MyDB'
Connecting to Verleger 'MyServer1s.MyDB'
MyServer1s.MyDB: {call sp_MSgetversion }
Percent Complete: 3
Ruft Publikationsinformationen ab
Percent Complete: 4
Ruft Abonnementinformationen ab
Connecting to Abonnent 'MyServerAT074.MyDB'
Disconnecting from Abonnent 'MyServerAT074'
Percent Complete: 4
Uploadet Datenänderungen zum Verleger
Percent Complete: 5
Ruft die Liste der Löschungen von MyServer1s.MyDB ab
Percent Complete: 5
Verarbeitet Artikel 'First'
......
SNIP
....
Percent Complete: 5
Verarbeitet Artikel 'LastTable'
Percent Complete: 0
Der Prozess konnte die Änderungen auf dem Abonnenten nicht aufzählen.
Percent Complete: 0
Category:SQLSERVER
Source: MyServerAT074
Number: 0
Message: Attributverletzung eingeschränkter Datentypen
Attributverletzung eingeschränkter Datentypen
Disconnecting from Abonnent 'MyServerAT074'
Disconnecting from Verleger 'MyServer1s'
Disconnecting from Verleger 'MyServer1s'
Disconnecting from Verteiler 'MyServer1s'
:confused:
I want to call a stored procedure to do the insert into my published arcticle/table. Is this possible? I know you can call a stored procedure to insert into the subscriber arctiles.
The problem is the published database has a generated primary key (max +1 )that is calculated via a stored procedure during all inserts. I would bring the stored procedure over to the subscriber but that would not help since the values in the target table will not be 'current' because the subscriber database is only updated nightly.
Thoughts?
I am tring to use SQL Server Mobile 2005 to subscribe to a SQL Server 2005 publication from a pocketPC. In my code I have a SqlCeReplication object. One of the properties that must be set is: Subscriber, but I have no idea what that should be set to. When I was setting up the publication I don't remember specifying anything like that, and the class description of this property doesn't help: "Specifies the name of the Subscriber". Any help will be appreciated.
View 3 Replies View Related
We are currently testing a Replication topology as follows:
SQL Server 2005 Developer as publisher and distributor of a push updatable transaction replication
2 SQL Server 2005 Express clients as subscribers.
The replication is working great. If the connection is lost, the subscribers switch from Immediate to Queued Updating, and seem to shift back to Immediate when they regain the connection.
My question is to determine if there is a way that I can ask SQL Express on the client which mode is it currently running, or ask SQL Express if it has a current live connection to the distributor.
I know that they are usually mutliple ways to accomplish tasks, and I would be open any suggestions, preferrable programming in VB (such as with SMO or RMO) or using stored procedures or functions.
I hope this give some people something to chew on during the weekend and thank you to all that have taking the time to read this.
I am very new to SQL coming from a SAS background.
I work at a College where I am trying to create a table that basically stores application data so that I can record how many applications we had on a set day.
For example I want to run it say bi-weekly and create a date/time stamp for each row and then the next time it runs it appends to the original table but with the new date/time stamp.
I have managed to create the table and the date/time stamp but I'm not sure how to do the next stage.
This is not the best practice as the table will get "big" quite quickly (although we're only dealing in the hundreds in terms of rows). Ideally I'd have a more transactional database that only appends a record if there is a change i.e. the status of the application has changed from "Received" to "Interview" or similar.
I'm not sure how to copy and paste the code dynamically in this forum but this is what I have got so far (see below).
SELECT
CC.cc_name as Academy,
SUBSTRING(CC2.cc_reference,1,4) as Cost_Centre,
MD2.m_reference as Course,
MD2.m_name as Course_Name,
CAST(MD2.m_start AS DATE) as Start_Date,
[Code] ...
Hi Guys,
I have tried backing up the replication from Primary Server (Publisher) A and copying over to Subscriber B. When I sync. I am missing the data. I don't know what step I am missing or it is bug on SQL 2K SP3.
I don't know what i am doing wrong.
Can anybody give me a step by step detail how to backup the publisher database and copy to a subscriber and sync by saying the schema and data already available. As we have WAN problem all the times, and when I try the full snapshot of 20 gig it was taking more than 24 hrs and also if the connection fails my snapshot also fails
Please help.
Thanks in Advance,
-Anu
Hi Guys,
I tried all the ways ,no good result.
I am really running out of time.
Can somebody please help.
-Anu
Hi there,
I installed 2 SQL2000 servers at a client site, the first acting as a publisher and distributor for transactional replication. The second is a push subscription to the first. The client wanted to change the database name, and some other stuff, so I removed the replication and set it up again for the new database name.
All's fine at the publisher / distributor but the subscriber is showing as still having active push subscription to the old (and new) databases
Any idea how to fix this
I am using merge replication with a push subscription type. I am wondering if the updates of the tables on the subscriber side are push to the publisher from the subscriber or pulled from the subscriber by the publisher when the syncronisation takes place. this makes a big diferrence for me and i can't find the answer to this question anywhere...
if anyone could answer it would be really appreciated
Thanks
My manager does not want to go through the process of moving 40 GB of data to the subscriber database over the network as would occur during the initialization phase of replication (exact method of replication has yet to be determined). The subscriber db is for Web Access and will be read-only. He wants to back up a db and use tapes to restore the db on the subscriber db server, and then activate replication. I have told him that you have to allow SQL Server to create the objects on the subscriber side and you have to allow SQL Server to control the data flow, that manually creating the objects on the subscriber side will not work. He says that I am incorrect.
Who is right? I haven't been able to find an answer from the Microsoft site and news groups.
Thanks,