Delete With Join
Sep 27, 2005
-- Idea behind writing this query is to remove duplicate record
t1 table structure as follow
<sno> <identity> int
<value> <char(100)>
t1_tmp is just a replica of t1 with same values
Let say t1 has following value
1Amit
2Amit
3Amit
4Amit
5k
6k
7k
result must be
1 Amit
5 K
BUt when I run below query, it delete all rows... please help, I am newbia
delete from t1
from t1_tmp
where t1.sno <> t1_tmp.sno
and t1.value = t1_tmp.value
As
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 24, 1998
I am getting SEVERE performance problems with the following delete...
delete namelist where str(na_id) + str(na_liid) in (select str(na_id) + str(na_liid) from tnamelist)
... where na_id and na_liid are INT character types.
The individual fields are both indexed on both tables.
I can see no other factors affecting this query.
Any ideas as to how I can optimize this better?
Bob
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2007
below is my procedure i m deleting records with inner join
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_DeleteSkill
(
@SkillID integer,
-- Start 12/12/2007 Shailesh dubey DeVtask 07180
@ClientID integer,
@IsGlobal bit ,
@ParentModuleID int,
@ClientAccessID int,
@GroupID int
-- End 12/12/2007 Shailesh dubey DeVtask 07180
)
AS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM t_ClientSkills INNER JOIN dbo.fn_GetMyEmployeesByAreaAccess(@IsGlobal, @ParentModuleID, @ClientAccessID, @GroupID, 0, '', '', '') AS EMP ON (t_ClientSkills.ClientID = EMP.ClientID) WHERE SkillID = @SkillID AND ClientID = @ClientID
IF @@ERROR <> 0
BEGIN
RETURN(0) --Failed
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RETURN(1) --Success
END
END
getting below error
Server: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure sp_DeleteSkill, Line 40
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'INNER'.
what i m missing?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2005
well i have 2 table one name detcom and another entcom stored in DB1 the key for both to join on is lets say A, B, C . I need to check if there are records based on the key A, B, C of both table where C EQUALS to '80_300_113' and if there are delete them and then grab data from another
database named DB2 on same server (same instance) wich contains the same tables entcom and detcom and insert all the data from those tables into the same tables in DB1 based on the key and where C = '80_300_113'
PLZ help
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2005
Hallo,
Can anybody let me know what I need to change to make this query work:
delete
from a
inner b
on a.item = b.item
I get the error message "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'inner'."
Thanks,
Stephen.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2007
I need to delete records from one table base on criteria from another table. The example below from the Northwind database shows exactly what I want to do. I want to delete the records from the employee table who a terrorityID of 30346 in the EmployeeTerritories table.
Can someone tell me how to write a delete statement that will delete the rows returned from the following SQL Statement? The sql statement will return one employee name. I would lke to delete that one employee from the employee table and I haven’t been able to figure out how to do it.
////////// Sql Statment
SELECT dbo.EmployeeTerritories.EmployeeID, dbo.EmployeeTerritories.TerritoryID
FROM dbo.EmployeeTerritories INNER JOIN
dbo.Employees ON dbo.EmployeeTerritories.EmployeeID = dbo.Employees.EmployeeID
WHERE (dbo.EmployeeTerritories.TerritoryID = N'30346')
////////// end of sql statement
Thanks
GEM
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2015
What is the logic of the below DELETE statement?It deletes all records where the file_modified column value is smaller then the maximum value in the same column, but not crystal clear how...
delete a
from Staging a
left join (select max(file_modifieddate) as file_modifieddate from Staging) b on
a.file_modifieddate = b.file_modifieddate
where b.file_modifieddate is null
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2008
Hi,
I have a table with a large number of records that I need to delete, before attempt to perform the delete I also archived the records to another table.
So I need to delete all of these selected records stored in the archive table from the main table. I can now reference all the records that qualify for the delete in the main table by performing a join on the archive table like so:
select * from my_main_table a
join my_archive_table b
on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id
and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key
and a.identifier=b.indentifier
So all the records check out to be the ones I'd like to perform a delete on but I just can't figure out how to perform a delete of the records with little or no change to the existing query.
Obviously something like this won't work:
delete from my_main_table a
join my_archive_table b
on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id
and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key
and a.identifier=b.indentifier
Though it would be nice if it did.:D
So my question is how would I use the existing query with some modification to delete only the records that this query returns. I've tried selection of records in the main table based on the existing records in the archive table but it can return a higher number of records than what I know is expected. I actually need the join specified to be in place to do it.
Can anyone render any assistance on this one???
I would certainly appreciate it.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2006
In SQL Server 2000/2005 (not CE) I can use the following T-SQL statement to delete orphaned rows from a table:
DELETE GroupsMembers FROM GroupsMembers LEFT OUTER JOIN Groups ON GroupsMembers.GroupID = Groups.ID WHERE Groups.ID IS NULL
SQL Server CE does not seem to support combining the JOIN statement with the DELETE statement. Is this correct? If yes, is there any alternative statement that could be used to accomplish the same thing?
Gerrit
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
Hello
Can any one tell me the difference between Cross Join, inner join and outer join in laymans language
by just taking examples of two tables such as Customers and Customer Addresses
Thank You
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2007
I need to run a DELETE query based on 2 tables. I can't use JOIN with delete queries, so how do I do this?
What I initially tried to do was:
Code:
DELETE FROM tblProductState
JOIN tblProduct
ON tblProduct.id_Product = tblProductState.id_Product
WHERE tblProductState.id_State = 54 AND tblProduct.id_ProductType = 1
Basically, I need to delete FROM tblProductState, WHERE tblProductState.id_State = 54 AND tblProduct.id_ProductType = 1
How can I do this without using JOIN. Use a sub-query? How?
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2015
I have some simple files but they are failing because the delete history task is failing as it is looking for files in a non existent directory.
It is looking for files in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.INSTANCEMSSQLLog whereas it should be looking in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLLog
how I can get this corrected so I can get the Maintenance Plans to run correctly.
I have tried deleting and recreating the Plan but to no avail
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2012
I am using Master Data Service for couple of months now. I can load, update, merge and soft delete data in MDS. Occasionally we even have to hard delete data from MDS. If we keep on soft deleting records in a MDS table eventually there will be huge number of soft deleted records. Is there an easy way to hard delete all the soft deleted records from all MDS tables in a specific Model.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2004
Hello:
Need some serious help with this one...
Background:
Am working on completing an ORM that can not only handles CRUD actions -- but that can also updates the structure of a table transparently when the class defs change. Reason for this is that I can't get the SQL scripts that would work for updating a software on SqlServer to be portable to other DBMS systems. Doing it by code, rather than SQL batch has a chance of making cross-platform, updateable, software...
Anyway, because it needs to be cross-DBMS capable, the constraints are that the system used must work for the lowest common denominator....ie, a 'recipe' of steps that will work on all DBMS's.
The Problem:
There might be simpler ways to do this with SqlServer (all ears :-) - just in case I can't make it cross platform right now) but, with simplistic DBMS's (SqlLite, etc) there is no way to ALTER table once formed: one has to COPY the Table to a new TMP name, adding a Column in the process, then delete the original, then rename the TMP to the original name.
This appears possible in SqlServer too --...as long as there are no CASCADE operations.
Truncate table doesn't seem to be the solution, nor drop, as they all seem to trigger a Cascade delete in the Foreign Table.
So -- please correct me if I am wrong here -- it appears that the operations would be
along the lines of:
a) Remove the Foreign Key references
b) Copy the table structure, and make a new temp table, adding the column
c) Copy the data over
d) Add the FK relations, that used to be in the first table, to the new table
e) Delete the original
f) Done?
The questions are:
a) How does one alter a table to REMOVE the Foreign Key References part, if it has no 'name'.
b) Anyone know of a good clean way to get, and save these constraints to reapply them to the new table. Hopefully with some cross platform ADO.NET solution? GetSchema etc appears to me to be very dbms dependant?
c) ANY and all tips on things I might run into later that I have not mentioned, are also greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sky
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2006
I am having great difficulty with cascading deletes, delete triggers and referential integrity.
The database is in First Normal Form.
I have some tables that are child tables with two foreign keyes to two different parent tables, for example:
Table A
/
Table B Table C
/
Table D
So if I try to turn on cascading deletes for A/B, A/C, B/D and C/D relationships, I get an error that I cannot have cascading delete because it would create multiple cascade paths. I do understand why this is happening. If I delete a row in Table A, I want it to delete child rows in Table B and table C, and then child rows in table D as well. But if I delete a row in Table C, I want it to delete child rows in Table D, and if I delete a row in Table B, I want it to also delete child rows in Table D.
SQL sees this as cyclical, because if I delete a row in table A, both table B and table C would try to delete their child rows in table D.
Ok, so I thought, no biggie, I'll just use delete triggers. So I created delete triggers that will delete child rows in table B and table C when deleting a row in table A. Then I created triggers in both Table B and Table C that would delete child rows in Table D.
When I try to delete a row in table A, B or C, I get the error "Delete Statement Conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE". This does not make sense to me, can anyone explain? I have a trigger in place that should be deleting the child rows before it attempts to delete the parent row...isn't that the whole point of delete triggers?????
This is an example of my delete trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER [DeleteA] ON A
FOR DELETE
AS
Delete from B where MeetingID = ID;
Delete from C where MeetingID = ID;
And then Table B and C both have delete triggers to delete child rows in table D. But it never gets to that point, none of the triggers execute because the above error happens first.
So if I then go into the relationships, and deselect the option for "Enforce relationship for INSERTs and UPDATEs" these triggers all work just fine. Only problem is that now I have no referential integrity and I can simply create unrestrained child rows that do not reference actual foreign keys in the parent table.
So the question is, how do I maintain referential integrity and also have the database delete child rows, keeping in mind that the cascading deletes will not work because of the multiple cascade paths (which are certainly required).
Hope this makes sense...
Thanks,
Josh
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2006
I'm trying to clean up a database design and I'm in a situation to where two tables need a FK but since it didn't exist before there are orphaned records.
Tables are:
Brokers and it's PK is BID
The 2nd table is Broker_Rates which also has a BID table.
I'm trying to figure out a t-sql statement that will parse through all the recrods in the Broker_Rates table and delete the record if there isn't a match for the BID record in the brokers table.
I know this isn't correct syntax but should hopefully clear up what I'm asking
DELETE FROM Broker_Rates
WHERE (Broker_Rates.BID <> Broker.BID)
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
this is my Delete Query NO 1
alter table ZT_Master disable trigger All
Delete ZT_Master WHERE TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
alter table ZT_Master enable trigger All
I have troble in Delete Query No 2
here is a select statemnt , I need to delete them
select d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
I tried modified it as below
delete d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
but this doesn't works..
can you please help?
and can I combine these 2 SQL Query into one Sql Query? thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2008
I'm using SqlDataSource and an Access database. Let's say I got two tables:user: userID, usernamemessage: userID, messagetextLet's say a user can register on my website, and leave several messages there. I have an admin page where I can select a user and delete all of his messages just by clicking one button.What would be the best (and easiest) way to make this?Here's my suggestion:I have made a "delete query" (with userID as parameter) in MS Access. It deletes all messages of a user when I type in the userID and click ok.Would it be possible to do this on my ASP.net page? If yes, what would the script look like?(yes, it is a newbie question)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2013
The requirement is: I should allow single row delete from a table but not bulk delete. An audit table should get updated if there is any single delete or single update. So I wrote the triggers as follows: for single and bulk delete
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[TRG_Delete_Bulk_tbl_attendance]
ON [dbo].[tbl_attendance]
AFTER DELETE
AS
[code]...
When I try to run the website, the database error I am getting is:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 0, current count = 1.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2007
I ran the following query in Query Analyzer on a machine running SQL Server 2000. I'm attempting to delete from a linked server running SQL Server 2005:
DELETE FROM sql2005.production.dbo.products
WHERE vendor='Foo'
AND productId NOT IN
(
SELECT productId FROM sql2000.staging.dbo.fooProductList
)
The status message (and @@ROWCOUNT) told me 8 rows were affected, but nothing was actually deleted; when I ran a SELECT with the same criteria as the DELETE, all 8 rows are still there. So, once more I tried the DELETE command. This time it told me 7 rows were affected; when I ran the SELECT again, 5 of the rows were still there. Finally, after running this exact same DELETE query 5 times, I was able to remove all 8 rows. Each time it would tell me that a different number of rows had been deleted, and in no case was that number accurate.
I've never seen anything like this before. Neither of the tables involved were undergoing any other changes. There's no replication going on, or anything else that should introduce any delays. And I run queries like this all day, involving every thinkable combination of 2000 and 2005 servers, that don't give me any trouble.
Does anyone have suggestions on what might cause this sort of behavior?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2007
Hi,
I have a problem with one report on my server. A user has requested that I exclude him from receiving a timed email subscription to several reports. I was able to amend all the subscriptions except one. When I try to remove his email address from the subscription I receive this error:
An internal error occurred on the report server. See the error log for more details. (rsInternalError) Get Online Help
For more information about this error navigate to the report server on the local server machine, or enable remote errors
Online no help couldn't offer any advice at all, so I thought I'd just delete the subscription and recreate it again, but I receive the same message. "Okay, no problem, I'll just delete the report and redeploy it and set up the subscription so all the other users aren't affected", says I. "Oh, no!", says the report server, and then it give me this message:
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Only members of sysadmin role are allowed to update or delete jobs owned by a different login. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.InstrumentedSqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.DBInterface.DeleteObject(String objectName) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService._DeleteItem(String item) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService.ExecuteBatch(Guid batchId) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportingService2005.ExecuteBatch() --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
What's even weirder is that I'm the owner and creator of the report and I'm a system admin and content manager on the report server and I set up the subscription when the report was initially deployed. Surely I should have sufficient rights to fart around with this subscription/report as I see fit?
I have rebooted the server, redeployed the report, checked credentials on the data source and tried amending and deleting from both the report manager and management studio but still I am prevented from doing so.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2015
I have two xml source and i need only left restricted data.
how can i perform left restricted join?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2015
I was writing a query using both left outer join and inner join. And the query was ....
SELECT
       S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
       Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
      (Production.Products AS P
        INNER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
[code]....
However ,the result that i got was correct.But when i did the same query using the left outer join in both the cases
i.e..
SELECT
       S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
       Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
(Production.Products AS P
LEFT OUTER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
ON C.categoryid = P.categoryid)
ON
S.supplierid = P.supplierid
WHERE
S.country = N'Japan';
The result i got was same,i.e
supplier   country   productid   productname   unitprice   categorynameSupplier QOVFD   Japan   9   Product AOZBW   97.00   Meat/PoultrySupplier QOVFD   Japan  10   Product YHXGE   31.00   SeafoodSupplier QOVFD   Japan  74   Product BKAZJ   10.00   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   13   Product POXFU   6.00   SeafoodSupplier QWUSF   Japan   14   Product PWCJB   23.25   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   15   Product KSZOI   15.50   CondimentsSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULLSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULL
and this time also i got the same result.My question is that is there any specific reason to use inner join when join the third table and not the left outer join.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2014
I have two select statements, in between select statement taking UNION ALL . I need to avoid the error
Warning: The join order has been enforced because a local join hint is used.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Scenario:
OLEDB source 1
SELECT ...
,[MANUAL DCD ID] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM [dbo].[XLSDCI] ORDER BY [MANUAL DCD ID] ASC
OLEDB source 2
SELECT ...
,[Bo Tkt Num] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM ....[dbo].[FFFenics] ORDER BY [Bo Tkt Num] ASC
These two tasks are followed immediately by a MERGE JOIN
All columns in source1 are ticked, all column in source2 are ticked, join key is shown above.
join type is left outer join (source 1 -> source 2)
result of source1 (..dcd column)
...
4-400-8000119
4-400-8000120
4-400-8000121
4-400-8000122 <--row not joining
4-400-8000123
4-400-8000124
...
result of source2 (..tkt num column)
...
4-400-1000118
4-400-1000119
4-400-1000120
4-400-1000121
4-400-1000122 <--row not joining
4-400-1000123
4-400-1000124
4-400-1000125
...
All other rows are joining as expected.
Why is it failing for this one row?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2015
I'm having trouble with a multi-table JOIN statement with more than one JOIN statement.
For each order, I need to return the following: CarsID, CarModelName, MakeID, OrderDate, ProductName, Total ordered the Car Category.
The carid (primary key) and carmodelname belong to the Cars table.
The makeid and orderdate belong to the OrderDetails table.
The productname and carcategory belong to the Product table.
The number of rows returned should be the same as the number of rows in OrderDetails.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2013
Why would I use a left join instead of a inner join when the columns entered within the SELECT command determine what is displayed from the query results?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2006
I have a merge join (full outer join) task in a data flow. The left input comes from a flat file source and then a script transformation which does some custom grouping. The right input comes from an oledb source. The script transformation output is asynchronous (SynchronousInputID=0). The left input has many more rows (200,000+) than the right input (2,500). I run it from VS 2005 by right-click/execute on the data flow task. The merge join remains yellow and the task never finishes. I do see a row count above the flat file destination that reaches a certain number and seems to get stuck there. When I test with a smaller file on the left it works OK. Any suggestions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2007
I'm using SQL Server 2005.
A piece of software I wrote starting timing out on a query that left outer joins a table to a view. Both the table and view have approximately the same number of rows (about 170000).
The table has 2 very similar columns, one is a varchar(1) and another is varchar(100). Neither are included in any index and beyond the size difference, the columns have the same properties. One of the employees here uses the varchar(1) column (called miscsearch) to tag large sets of rows to perform some action on. In this case, he had set 9000 rows miscsearch value to "g". The query then should join the table and view for all rows where miscsearch is set to g in the table. This query takes at least 20 minutes to run (I stopped it at this point).
If I remove the "where" clause and join all rows in the two tables, the query completes in about 20 seconds. If set the varchar(100) column (called descrip) to "g" for the same rows set via miscsearch, the query completes in about 20 seconds.
If I force the join type to a hash join, the query completes using miscsearch in about 30 seconds.
So, this works:
SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER HASH JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE miscsearch = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC
and this works:
SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE descrip = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC
But this does't:
SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE miscsearch = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC
What should I be looking for here to understand why this is happening?
Thanks,
john
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2006
First, this is not my code.
This one is weird and I am missing something fundamental on this one. A developer was getting a timeout with this...
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING WHERE CLMRECDID IN (SELECT DISTINCT CLMRECDID FROM CLAIMSRECEIVED WHERE SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices where ClmRecdPyID in (SELECT ClmRecdPyID
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors WHERE ClmRecdid in (SELECT ClmRecdID
FROM ClaimsReceived
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
I applied a couple of indices and got ride of the uncorrelated subqueries
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
JOIN CLAIMSRECEIVED
ON INVOICECLAIMMAPPING.CLMRECDID = CLAIMSRECEIVED.CLMRECDID
WHERE CLAIMSRECEIVED.SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
JOIN ClaimsReceivedPayors
ON ClaimsreceivedPayorServices.ClmRecdPyID = ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecPyID
WHERE ClaimsReceivedPayors.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsReceivedPayors
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
JOIN ClaimsReceived
ON ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecdid = ClaimsReceived.ClmRecdid
WHERE ClaimsReceived.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
Suddenly this constraint was being violated with the change
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ClaimsReceivedPayorServices] ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_ClaimsReceivedPayorServices_CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYOR S] FOREIGN KEY
(
[ClmRecdPyID]
) REFERENCES [CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYORS] (
[CLMRECPYID]
)
Is the delete on ClaimsReceivedPayors starting before the delete on ClaimsreceivedPayorServices finishes? If so why would it matter between the join and subquery? This one is making me depressed because I can not explain it.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
Hi all
Need some advice solving a little problem I have with my database!
Current setup:
I have a person table that is made up of 39 columns. I also allow for person records to be deleted but I do this by having another table I call LogicallyDeletedrecords. This table is made up of the PersonId, Reason for deletion/suppression and a date time stamp. To access Live records I created a view based on my Person table which contains a WHERE clause to exclude records that exist in the LogicallyDeletedrecords. Similarly, I have another view DeadPersonData which contains Person records that have been removed. Hope it all makes sense so far! Now on to my worries!
The problem:
My Person table contains 9+ million records. The LogicallyDeletedrecords table has 500k+ but I anticipate further growth over the coming weeks/months. My worry is that my LivePersonData view will be too slow to access as my LogicallyDeletedrecords table grows. What’s more, as part of my Load routine, I have to make sure that Person data loaded on to the system is excluded if that same person exists as a deleted member. Both of these actions could slow down my system as the deleted table grows.
My thoughts:
I’ve been thinking of physically deleting dead Person records from my person table (possibly creating an archive table to hold them). But then if I delete them how do I cross check the details when new Person details get loaded?! As I said, my current LogicallyDeletedrecords table holds the PersonId, ReasonDeleted and CreationStamp. The only way is to add further columns which I use to match Person Details?
Any design suggestions would be welcome!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2007
I am trying to write one sql statement that deletes from two tables. Is it possible ? If yes, any thoughts ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2007
Awesome! I don't alway get the email notification of whoever reply to the posting. I think it only work after I log off of the forum.
Scott
View 2 Replies
View Related
