Whe we execute sp_who2 on a SQL server Command column displays the following:Any idea on what is CONDITIONAl?? SIGNAL HANDLER LOCK MONITOR LAZY WRITER LOG WRITER CHECKPOINT SLEEP AWAITING COMMAND BULK INSERT CONDITIONAl
sp_who2 shows the block by user and some information.Currently we are moving from sql 2000 to sql 2005. if i execute the sp_who2 in sql 2005 it shows only my login block information. it does not show other users. is there any admin rights has to give to view other block user ??? how to do that.
Is there any way to calculate (just an approximation is fine) theamount of work that is done for an insert statement?For example, can I calculate the approximate row size of my table andthen compare that with the DiskIO for my SPID to determineapproximately how many rows have already been written? Or, does theDiskIO include shuffling data around or other DiskIO that makes thiskind of comparison impossible?Thanks,-Tom.
Thanks, folks, for taking time to help!In query analyzer and profiler, there seem to be system processes thatare generating high cpu time and disk io. Well, I guess the short ofit is that I am having a problem interpreting what I am seeing so thatI can take the next step in corrective action. There are also severaldomain controlled logins that appear to be on the same host name, atthe same time--these are laptops, not terminal servers--why would thesystem be reporting such a thing?Here is a sample of the output from sp_who2:SPIDSTATUSLOGINHOSTNAMEBLKBYDBNAMECOMMANDCPU TIMEDISKIOLASTBATCHPROGRAMNAME1BACKGROUND sa . . NULLLAZY WRITER75006/3/2005 5:142sleeping sa . . NULLLOG WRITER1025006/3/2005 5:143BACKGROUND sa . . masterSIGNAL HANDLER1606/3/2005 5:144BACKGROUND sa . . NULLLOCK MONITOR20306/3/2005 5:145BACKGROUND sa . . masterTASK MANAGER01516/3/2005 5:147sleeping sa . . NULLCHECKPOINTSLEEP243822396/3/2005 5:1410BACKGROUND sa . . masterTASK MANAGER0256/3/2005 5:1411BACKGROUND sa . . masterTASK MANAGER01636/3/2005 5:1412BACKGROUND sa . . masterTASK MANAGER0706/3/2005 5:1413BACKGROUND sa . . masterTASK MANAGER01556/3/2005 5:1451sleeping saMyServer . msdbAWAITINGCOMMAND683371386/8/2005 13:00SQLAgent - Generic Refresher52sleeping saMyServer . msdbAWAITINGCOMMAND1746266/8/2005 13:00SQLAgent - Alert Engine53sleeping DomainUser1LT1 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND1687546/8/2005 12:31Crystal Reports54sleeping saMyServer . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND377296/8/2005 10:49MS SQLEM55RUNNABLE DomainUser2MyServer .masterSELECT 86006/8/2005 12:40SQL Profiler56RUNNABLE DomainUser2LT2 . VPNSELECT34496/8/2005 12:50Microsoft® Access57sleeping DomainUser3LT2 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND110296/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access58sleeping DomainUser1LT1 .masterAWAITING COMMAND1172156/8/2005 9:31Crystal Reports59sleeping DomainUser4LT2 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND1516/8/2005 12:50Microsoft® Access62sleeping DomainUser5LT2 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND3226/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access63sleeping DomainUser6LT2 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND50106/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access64sleeping DomainUser6LT2 . VPNAWAITINGCOMMAND101606/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access65sleeping DomainUser6LT2 . VPNMasterAWAITING COMMAND47496/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access66sleeping DomainUser3LT2 . VPNAWAITINGCOMMAND20306/8/2005 12:50Microsoft® Access67sleeping DomainUser6LT2 . VPNAWAITINGCOMMAND24906/8/2005 12:52Microsoft® Access68RUNNABLE saMyServer . masterSELECTINTO 62126/8/2005 12:59SQL Query AnalyzerThanks,Eric
The behavior seems to have changed on SP_WHO2 in SQL 2005.
In SQL 2000 I could be logged in as a regular user in my system and run SP_WHO2 and get all the users currently logged in. This is no longer working in SQL 2005. It now only returns "me".
What kind of rights do you need to have to see who is logged in?
Is there any way to write a line to a table showing who had a lock at a particular time?
We have a need to rollback transactions that persist for too long and cause application errors. what i want to do is to dump the details of the connection into a table for analysis later.
i am thinking along the lines of SELECT loginname FROM sp_who WHERE spid in ( SELECT spid FROM sp_lock ) or something!!!!
I have some users on Citrix, running an Access front end with ODBCattached tables.In sp_who. on a normal workstation they'd usually show once or maybemore but all with the same hostname so counting actual number of usersis easy, group on loginame,hostname.When someone connects from a Citrix server, I append the connectionnumber to the workstation name in the connect string so the hostnamelooks something like "CITRIXBOXICA-tcp#256" also for terminal servicesthe hostname will look like "GANDALFRDP-Tcp#8".The problem is that on Citrix the user appears twice with a differenttcp number, the hostname is made up of the name of the citrix/ts server+ the environment variable %SESSIONNAME%, which is surely static for asession?Has anyone seen this in Citrix? Does it ghost old connections? I loogedout and in again just now and saw the sessions look like:CITRIXBOXICA-tcp#199 & CITRIXBOXICA-tcp#254 for my user name thenafter re-logging on I got CITRIXBOXICA-tcp#199 & CITRIXBOXICA-tcp#256so that session 199 has stuck there but wasn't visible in sp_who whilenot logged into the Citrix box.
In the sql server analyzer, i ran sp_who2 store procedure to find out the procesess and locks on the sql server. I noticed on the status column some entries "RUNNABLE", does this could trigger blocked to other processess if not closed by our application? or What does runnable status mean?
Beside sp_who which shows the number of connections to databases, is there any other sp that shows us the starting time for each connection because the sp_who does not show the starting of the connection.
I'm using SQL SERVER 7.0. When I do sp_who from Query Analyser to see who has processes running, I get three statuses on the processes, 'runnable', 'background', 'sleeping'. I can't find anywhere in books, BOL, anywhere that tells me a definition of what each of these statuses mean. Can anyone help me out?
Hello All, I need to find out which user are connected to a What database. For this I can Use SP_WHo. But How can i fetch the required fields only dat too in Query Analyzer
Hello 2 all,Maybe my question can be very stupid, but I'm a little confused.When I run sp_who on my database, I see one process (accessing remotelymy database from another database on another SQL server) many manytimes.Well, I assume that this is one process, because I cannot imagin thatthe data aquiring can be done by almost 1000 (thousand) openedconnections.This is what I have. Almost 1000 spids running (sleeping) with cmd =awaiting command.The best part is, that when I run sp_lock, I see, that the currentsession of the client, (lets say spid 53) is locking tempdb, withobjects id below 10 (system).As far as i know, and as far as I'm using this in my software, there isno necessity to open-close-open-close connection.Normaly, you can just open a connection to db, with assigned spid, andoperate within this just one. After the disconect ist done, the sessionshoould be removed.I think, there is something wrong in the way, the remote system isconnecting to my database, but i'm not sure is it normal what I'mexpieriencing or not.below, a piece of that what sp_who returned:SPIDECIDstatusloginnamehostnameblkdbnamecmd2660sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMAND2670sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMAND2680sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMAND2690sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMAND2700sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMAND2710sleeping remote_user_namehost_ERP 0PRIMARY_PROCESS_DBAWAITING COMMANDand these are locks from sp_lock 53 which is the current runningprocess:53700DB SGRANT53260TAB IXGRANT53210TAB IXGRANT53230TAB IXGRANT53220TAB IXGRANT532120TAB IXGRANT53290TAB IXGRANT532110TAB IXGRANT53232KEY(1902141b21c7) XGRANT53213KEY(e60041ad2c6f) XGRANT53232KEY(5b0233670fb9) XGRANT53232KEY(6e0212a7298c) XGRANT53232KEY(97013ece81c8) XGRANT53231KEY(e7006f987fb0) XGRANT53213KEY(ad00a33f46b9) XGRANT53210643560700TAB Sch-MGRANTany idee?ThanksMateusz
am experiencing excessive SSB thread block'n...sql error log is reporting LOTS of Resource Monitor messages about non-yielding threads (nothing meaningful can be surmised from it).
I am running on a 4way 64bit 2003 box w/6gb ram!!!
SSB architecture is simple implementation... Leveraging async trigger(s) in 42 db's (all on same instance) that post (via srvc) into a mstr db queue...where a listener is pull'n them off and applyies to a table (trying to avoid excessive 1205's that I was experiencing using sync trigger approach before)....messages sit in respective db's trans queue and draining of queues is extremely SLOW!!!! I mean SLOW!!!
Eventually SqlServer.exe process pegs out ALL processors!!! Only can reboot box to get connectivity back...~
Anyone have this experience!? (really hope not...but I need help)
Have completely cycled SSB machinery (via disable/enable)...and have even stepped thru enabling one db at a time...but still very poor performance!!!
Anyone?
-mt
sp_who output here...
BACKGROUND sa . 16 NULL RESOURCE MONITOR BACKGROUND sa . . NULL LAZY WRITER SUSPENDED sa . . NULL LOG WRITER BACKGROUND sa . . master SIGNAL HANDLER BACKGROUND sa . . NULL LOCK MONITOR sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER BACKGROUND sa . . master TRACE QUEUE TASK sleeping sa . . NULL UNKNOWN TOKEN BACKGROUND sa . . master BRKR TASK BACKGROUND sa . . master TASK MANAGER SUSPENDED sa . . master CHECKPOINT sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER BACKGROUND sa . 16 ThompsonTractorD43 KILLED/ROLLBACK sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER BACKGROUND sa . . master KILLED/ROLLBACK BACKGROUND sa . 16 master KILLED/ROLLBACK sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER BACKGROUND sa . . master BRKR TASK BACKGROUND sa . 16 master BRKR TASK sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER sleeping sa . . master TASK MANAGER BACKGROUND sa . 16 YancyMachineryCat KILLED/ROLLBACK BACKGROUND sa . . master BRKR EVENT HNDLR BACKGROUND sa . . master BRKR TASK sleeping NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb AWAITING COMMAND sleeping NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb AWAITING COMMAND sleeping NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb AWAITING COMMAND sleeping NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb AWAITING COMMAND SUSPENDED NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb DELETE sleeping fastironweb DETROIT . Cat_Lvl3 AWAITING COMMAND sleeping mike REFINERY1 . master AWAITING COMMAND SUSPENDED NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . distribution WAITFOR sleeping mike REFINERY1 . Cat_Cfsc AWAITING COMMAND sleeping mike REFINERY1 . Cat_Cfsc AWAITING COMMAND sleeping mike REFINERY1 . Cat_Cfsc AWAITING COMMAND RUNNABLE mike REFINERY1 . Cat_Cfsc SELECT INTO sleeping NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM REFINERY1 . msdb AWAITING COMMAND
I've got a new server with Pentium4 xeon processors. I've used sp_who2for quite a while on my old server -- to look at CPU and IO usage. Onthe new server, the CPU times are huge -- although actual performanceis quite good. I know sp_who2 is an undocumented proc. Has anyoneexperienced this or is it just me?
we have one 'application'-user in sysusers that makes the connect to SqlServer for all users, for example:
Application Login-User: Thomas DB-Connect-User: AppUser
With this solution, in Activity-Monitor or with sp_who I don't know, what is the real name of the connected user. Any possibility to change the login-information after the connect, so that i can see 'Thomas' in Activity-Monitor or with sp_who?
What is the difference between below? And how can I make GETDATE() the same as System.DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString()? System.DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString() and GETDATE()
Hello, I am transfereing Data into text format. The datas are about 5 table and has almost 50000 to 2 million rows. I am using the same query for BCP and DTS. But I find the dreference between those. I mean DTS is taking less memory and more time than BCP to complete the process . Anybody can share any comment for this issue ?.