i have a user database called calls. In that database there are about 100 of tables. now i want to give permission to that tables to a new user so what is the easiest way to give permission in a single shot to the 100 of the tables.
I know how to give the object permission to the table. But for 100 talbes it will take a lot of times , isn't it???
I've been looking through permissions to see if it's possible to grant a user permission to see only certain records from a table.
For example:
I'm granting users to view records in the table 'Sales', but I only want the users to see their respective data.
User A should only be able to see Sales where Sales.Location = 1
User B should only be able to see Sales where Sales.Location = 2
... and so on.
I believe I've read this is possible, but in looking through the permissions you can define, I've only found where you can limit the columns a user sees, not records.
Anyone have any ideas or did I just remember something wrong?
I am getting some problem in using group in sql server login.
i have two NT groups in windows.i) developer and tester
I added a user Lalit in both gruop. I want to give db_owner permission on a particular database(Employee) to developer group and data_denyreader and deny_writer on same database(Employee) to tester group.
Now when i logging in to sql server using Lalit(windows authentication) iam not able to access the database(Employee).
Now my concern is that Lalit should have full access to the employee database when entered as developer user and limited access to employee database when entered as tester user.
i have a table "employee" , i have given grant all rights to a user in sql 6.5 server . still whenever he tries to access the table from VB he gets an error "execute permission denied on table employee, owner dbo" . if i log in the server with this user name and his password i am able to interact with the table . please help.
i have an application in vb6.0 and sql 6.5 . the sa has created a table as "employee" . there are no stored procedures in the databases. whenever i try to acces the table "employee" , but not as sa ,but as a user defined in the database . i get an error "execute permission denied on object employee, owner dbo " . if i allow users to login as dbo then security is a problem . please help . i know that eexcute permissions are only there for stored procedures , then how this error is coming for the table.
I have an application that uses Integrated Windows authentication. My Web.config looks like below <add key="dbconnection" value=" server=XXX;Initial Catalog=XXX;persist security info=False;Integrated Security=SSPI;Pooling=true" /> When users try to access my application, they get the below error: Execute permission denied on object 'SprocName', database 'DBNAME',Owner,'dbo' The Only way I could get rid off the error is if I set DBO permissions for the user group on the databse. Can someone suggest how to set up a security group with the ‘necessary’ permissions on SQL SERVER (ie read,write execute Sproc etc) and not too many extra ones, like DBO. Thanks,
SQL Server 2005 anomoly? In SQL Server Management Studio I granted specific permissions to user "A" to do Select, Insert, Update, Delete on Table "B" - When I logged on as User "A" and attempted the Insert imto table "B" I got the following error: "Insert Permission Denied on Table B, Database C, Schema dbo" Is this a problem with the dbo schema?
Then I went back and created a stored proccedure "D" with the exact same Insert statement inside the procedure. I granted User "A" execute permission on the stored procedure "D". I then logged on as User A and executed Stored Procedure "D". No Problem - stored procedure executed fine with the Insert. I attempted the Insert statement again - straight SQL - as User "A" and got the same error as above ("Insert Permission Denied.....") Strange behavior - cannot do a SQL. Insert even though user has permissions but can execute a store procedure with the same Insert statement. What gives?
My challenge is that I need to write a stored procedure for example, that will find the PrizeID associated with the 4th count of the PromotionID that equals 1 . So in this example, counting to the 4th PromotionID that equalls 1 give us a PrizeID of 5.
I hope I've made myself clear! Can anyone write out a mini SP on how to do this.
I populate the above table via a DTS and have checked and have verified that correct data is coming in... I also have a product master table; for business reasons we can have the same product created with different ProductCodes though the rest of the Product details are EXACTLY the same. We have covered this using a field named 'UniqueProdCode'.
... many other product fields e.g. unit price, category etc... ... )
First a small Request: Please note that I have NOT defined links between my tables (in the diagram editor) nor have I defined Primary keys (or any constraint) for any of the tables. When you kindly reply, please suggest I should define primary keys for the tables and also link them in the diagram editor.
[u]THE PROBLEM: When I do a count(*) query on the table 'SalesFACT', I get the correct number of records.
If I create a view, add table 'SalesFACT' and table ProdMaster, link the UniqueProdCode field of table 'SalesFACT' with the UniqueProdCode field of ProdMaster (so that I can also get the name, category, etc. for the products in the SalesFACT), and run a count(*) query I get a much higher and incorrect number of rows. The SQL for the view is:
SELECT dbo.SalesFACT.TransDate, dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode, dbo.SalesFACT.SaleAmt FROM dbo.SalesFACT INNER JOIN dbo.ProdMaster ON dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode = dbo.ProdMaster.UniqueProdCode
Kindly note that I have checked and the contents of the table SalesFACT' UniqueProdCode field DOES contain the correct data i.e. it contains the UniqueProdCode and NOT the ProdCode.
But if i link the "wrong fields", I get the correct count count :confused: i.e. I create a very similar view (as mentioned above) but instead link the UniqueProdCode of table SalesFACT with the ProdCode field (not the UniqueProdCode field) of ProdMaster table I get the correct count. This is really driving me nuts and I just can't understand what's going on and why the "REVERSE" logic. For your convenience here is the SQL for the 2nd view:
SELECTdbo.SalesFACT.TransDate, dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode, dbo.SalesFACT.SaleAmt FROM dbo.SalesFACT INNER JOIN dbo.ProdMaster ON dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode = dbo.ProdMaster.ProdCode
Please guide... I have run out of all the things that I could check and thus this SOS and F1
Making sure that the reportserver's web.config doesn't have an xmlns or something tag in...
Pulling out hair
Pulling out some more hair
Eventually deciding to set the reports server and manager on the Default Web's application pool to make use of Classic .Net application pool. It worked and I could finally browse my reports but every single one of them cannot be viewed and bombs out with:
Logon failed. (rsLogonFailed)
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007052E)
I have tried all sorts of combinations but none work..even Integrated Windows Authentication with the DB on my local machine. I have triple checked passwords etc and the SSRS configuration shows all of the statuses as green when i connect. Is there some sort of special setting that I have to set somewhere on Vista?? I have Vista Business
Hi All, I need to give access to one user only to truncate a particular table. I am not able to frame exact query for this. However i can user EM and do it. But i wanted to know the query for this.
select u_emp,(select name from [@emp] where code=u_emp) name1 from ovpm This query gives me the output having employee code and name. I want to further filter the employee name by giving a where clause as where name1='Carell'
select ClaimNumber, Surname, FirstName, CASE WHEN New= 0 THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No' END AS Processed
from EntryTable) Select * from ProcessedYesNo Where Ignore_dupe='Yes';
why I am getting an syntex error I check the query it is ok atleast the inner query is running but when I apply the with than I am getting Syntax error near 'WITH'
I have imported a DTS package to sql 2005. I am trying to run this DTS package from the JOB using DTSRun. and i am getting the following error. I thought it was some issue with the SQL Agent serivice account which this is running, i have created a proxy which has super privilages.. but still the job is failing. When i run the DTS package directly it's running fine.
I am confused !!!!!
Message Executed as user: AMRsql_seasdv. DTSRun: Loading... DTSRun: Executing... DTSRun OnStart: DTSStep_DTSExecuteSQLTask_1 DTSRun OnError: DTSStep_DTSExecuteSQLTask_1, Error = -2147467259 (80004005) Error string: Login failed for user ''. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection. Error source: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Help file: Help context: 0 Error Detail Records: Error: -2147467259 (80004005); Provider Error: 18452 (4814) Error string: Login failed for user ''. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection. Error source: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Help file: Help context: 0 DTSRun OnFinish: DTSStep_DTSExecuteSQLTask_1 DTSRun: Package execution complete. Process Exit Code 1. The step failed. Dev
when i try to run this following query, i get an error message:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e14'
The ntext data type cannot be selected as DISTINCT because it is not comparable.
/resultados_termo.asp, line 176
the query:
select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%fiat%' or nome_mod like '%fiat%' or estado like '%fiat%' or cidade like '%fiat%' or ano like '%fiat%' ) and ( nome_marc like '%brava%' or nome_mod like '%brava%' or estado like '%brava%' or cidade like '%brava%' or ano like '%brava%' ) and ( nome_marc like '%2004%' or nome_mod like '%2004%' or estado like '%2004%' or cidade like '%2004%' or ano like '%2004%' ) union select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%fiat%' or nome_mod like '%fiat%' or estado like '%fiat%' or cidade like '%fiat%' or ano like '%fiat%' ) and ( nome_marc like '%brava%' or nome_mod like '%brava%' or estado like '%brava%' or cidade like '%brava%' or ano like '%brava%' ) union select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%fiat%' or nome_mod like '%fiat%' or estado like '%fiat%' or cidade like '%fiat%' or ano like '%fiat%' ) union select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%brava%' or nome_mod like '%brava%' or estado like '%brava%' or cidade like '%brava%' or ano like '%brava%' ) and ( nome_marc like '%2004%' or nome_mod like '%2004%' or estado like '%2004%' or cidade like '%2004%' or ano like '%2004%' ) union select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%brava%' or nome_mod like '%brava%' or estado like '%brava%' or cidade like '%brava%' or ano like '%brava%' ) union select * from view_veiculos where ativo='1' and ( nome_marc like '%2004%' or nome_mod like '%2004%' or estado like '%2004%' or cidade like '%2004%' or ano like '%2004%' )
when i use UNION ALL, i get repeated rows. i need the select distinct on it.
I have created a user and given select permissions on a table, I want to go deeper and just give select on a few columns within the table but unable to do so. Can someone tell me how I can do this.
I populate the above table via a DTS and have checked and have verified that correct data is coming in... I also have a product master table; for business reasons we can have the same product created with different ProductCodes though the rest of the Product details are EXACTLY the same. We have covered this using a field named 'UniqueProdCode'.
... many other product fields e.g. unit price, category etc... ... )
First a small Request: Please note that I have NOT defined links between my tables (in the diagram editor) nor have I defined Primary keys (or any constraint) for any of the tables. When you kindly reply, please suggest I should define primary keys for the tables and also link them in the diagram editor.
[u]THE PROBLEM: When I do a count(*) query on the table 'SalesFACT', I get the correct number of records.
If I create a view, add table 'SalesFACT' and table ProdMaster, link the UniqueProdCode field of table 'SalesFACT' with the UniqueProdCode field of ProdMaster (so that I can also get the name, category, etc. for the products in the SalesFACT), and run a count(*) query I get a much higher and incorrect number of rows. The SQL for the view is:
SELECT dbo.SalesFACT.TransDate, dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode, dbo.SalesFACT.SaleAmt FROM dbo.SalesFACT INNER JOIN dbo.ProdMaster ON dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode = dbo.ProdMaster.UniqueProdCode
Kindly note that I have checked and the contents of the table SalesFACT' UniqueProdCode field DOES contain the correct data i.e. it contains the UniqueProdCode and NOT the ProdCode.
But if i link the "wrong fields", I get the correct count count :confused: i.e. I create a very similar view (as mentioned above) but instead link the UniqueProdCode of table SalesFACT with the ProdCode field (not the UniqueProdCode field) of ProdMaster table I get the correct count. This is really driving me nuts and I just can't understand what's going on. For your convenience here is the SQL for the 2nd view:
SELECTdbo.SalesFACT.TransDate, dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode, dbo.SalesFACT.SaleAmt FROM dbo.SalesFACT INNER JOIN dbo.ProdMaster ON dbo.SalesFACT.UniqueProdCode = dbo.ProdMaster.ProdCode
Please guide... I have run out of all the things that I could check and thus this SOS and F1
I have a view over 5 tables that has started giving unreliable results. There are three records that should be different, but in a production Access database, the view is giving three identical records where there should be three unique records. I have tested the view within SQL Server Management Studio and it gives the correct records there. But, I have attached this same view into the same Access database with two separate names. One instance of the view within Access database gives the correct records, and the other gives the incorrect (duplicated) records. I have attached screen shots that show these two separately named incarnations of the same SQL View, with the duplicated data, or the unique data highlighted.
I have also included the SQL query specs for this view.
what I can do to this view in order for it to always give us the unique records that we need, rather than sometimes the correct records, and sometimes the incorrect records.
I have SQL Server 2000 installed on one of my servers, I installed SQL Server 2005 as a named instance on the same server .... its giving me problems now , whenever I start going to the any component of SQL Server I get the following error :-
sqlmangr.exe - Application Error
The instruction at "0x780104ac" referenced memory at "0x1083e7b7" .The memory could not be read
Click Ok to terminate the program Click on Cancel to debug the program
since the last upgrade SQL 2000 --> 2005, the biggest database I am working on (1.4 GB, with loads of binary data) keeps freezin at least one time per week. When I say 'freezin' I mean that you cannot query some of the tables as it gives a timeout error when trying.
I am not a DBA and I don't have any idea of what to do, the only thing which comes to my mind is that this database is too big, as if I go to the preperties window it says Space Available: 38 MB (what's that? there's really only 38 MB on this DB?). I tried re-writing all mainteinment plans (full backup every night, log backup every hour), but I realized that the database keeps freezing (and the backup jobs keep running untill you stop them).
Is there a way to give a particular query greater system resources,such as share of the processor?I have two queries that were started from Query Analyzer. One is verylong, the other rather short. However the long one is taking almostall the processor resources and not allowing the short one to complete.I'd like to allocate more of the processor to the short one until itis done.I am the admin on this system and have access to Enterprise Mgr.Thanks.
I have an archival process on a large database that runs once a month.At the beginning of the process the triggers and indexes on thetables whose data is moved are dropped, the data is moved and then thetriggers and indexes are recreated at the end. This produces amassive improvement in performance.The problem is the process is supposed to run on users accounts (thatsthe way the front-end is set up) and they don't have the neccessarypermissions to drop & create triggers & indexes. I can't see any wayto give them permissions only on specific tables or triggers/indexes.Nor does giving them permissions to the stored procedures that do thedropping & re-creating work, DDL permissions don't seem to beinherited the way they are with tables.Is blanket rights to drop & create objects through the db_ddladminrole the only way users can get rights?Thanks,K Finegan
SELECT * FROM TRANSACCTION_HISTORY WHERE TXN_DATE=@RepDate
For the query parameter @RepDate, I would like to pass a function to it. The function is a calculation of date based on today's date (e.g. Today() function to be simple). So that users don't have to type in the date every time.
Now the question is: is it really possible to do that in RS? Because I am getting a type conversion error, when I put Today() in the Define Query Parameters disalog box.
We have a table of students with fields for the ID of the school district and their school name. For example:
DistrictID StudentName SchoolName
10001 John Smith Washington Elementary
10001 Jane Smith Lincoln Middle
10002 David White Hill High
... ... ...
I want is a listing with the school district ID, the student name, and the number of schools in the district.
I believe the following statement should give me what I want:
SELECT DistrictID, StudentName, COUNT(DISTINCT SchoolName) OVER (PARTITION BY DistrictID)
FROM StudentData
However, I get the error:
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Incorrect syntax near 'distinct'.
If I take out the DISTINCT it runs fine, however it counts all the rows as expected, which is not what I want. If I remove the OVER clause it runs fine, however, it counds the schools across all the districts, which is not what I want. I can remove the OVER clause and use GROUP BY, but not while also retrieving StudentName.
The SQL 2005 Online Books don't seem to indicate that my statement is invalid. Here are the links just for reference: Count: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175997.aspx Over: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189461.aspx
Anyone have an idea one what I'm doing wrong or how to go about getting this information? Thanks! Matt Penner
I'm migrating from 2000 to 2005, what is the best way to handle the following error:
The ALL permission is deprecated and maintained only for compatibility. It DOES NOT imply ALL permissions defined on the entity
The code is below:
DECLARE @sp_name AS sysname; DECLARE syscursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name FROM sysobjects WHERE (xtype = 'P' or xtype='V') AND ((status & 0x80000000) = 0);
OPEN syscursor; FETCH NEXT FROM syscursor INTO @sp_name;
WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0) BEGIN EXECUTE ('GRANT all ON ' + @sp_name + ' TO Public'); FETCH NEXT FROM syscursor INTO @sp_name; END