I am looking for an expression for a group in a matric. I am trying to figure out how to group by the a certain amount of letters in a string. For example if I have the followong fields I am grouping...
Bob001
Bob
Robert005
Doug053
Doug100
Douglas
Barney001
Frank
I want to group it up as...
Bob
Doug
Barney
Frank
And then be able to summarize the results in the matrix.
Could someone please help me? I am trying to pull in a partial string (the last six characters of the field, to be exact).
This is an example of my code:
select * into #temp_2 from #temp_1 a, Server2.DBa.dbo.table2 r where r.field1r = a.field1a and r.field3r = a.field3a (field3a is where I need just the last 6 characters)
To be more specific: r.field3r looks like 000884 a.field3a looks like 17445000884 So- I just want to pull in the 000884 off of a.field3a
Is it possible using Sql2000 to compare the first four characters of a parameter? WHERE (tblLinkInfo.CG_ID = @BCG_ID) AND ( 'first 4 characters' of Location_Zip.Zip = 'first 4 characters' of @ZipCodeIn)
Sorry, I realize that this is probably a pretty simple question for you, but I am in a quick time bind and would really appreciate it if someone could help me with this update that I'm trying to run.
Let's say you have a table (call it testtable) that contains the column "text".
Now in column text you want to replace all instantiations of the phrase "in the US" with "to the United States", how would you structure your update query to perform this change (Please note that this phrase could be embedded in the middle of a larger sentence like 'Send a package in the US'. You'd want to change this instance to 'Send a package to the United States')
Daily, I have to map thoursands of items into its correct category. What I have to do is Filter item by the ClSID and SCLISD, then look into the Label for where the item should be. For example from the attachment,
CLSID = 1 and SCLSID = 23 - if in the label has the keyword "notebook", its NEW_CAT should be 14 and its NEW_CATNAME is LAPTOPS;
CLSID = 1 and SCLSID = 23 - if in the Label contains Tablet PC, its NEW_CAT name should be 2474 and its NEW_CATNAME is PC LAPTOPS.
CLSID = 3 and SCLSID = 54 - if in the Label contains Watch, its NEW_CAT name should be A6052 and its New_CATNAME is SMART WATCH.
Basically, the work flow is looking into the CLSID, then SCLSID,then, Label and then assign a correct NEW_CAT and NEW_CATNAME of the item.
I have written a code but I can't get it look into specific CLSID and SCLSID.
For example, i have when upper(Label) like upper ('%Tablet%PC%') then '2474 PC Laptops'
I have a sql server table column that can contain the following possible values. 1. 766/IT 2. 777/HR3. 890/EG4. 012/AS5. Trainee6. Contractor 7. Others I want to write an SQL query grouped by this column, Trainee should be one group, Contractor should be another different group, Others should be another different group and then every thing else ( 766/IT ,777/HR ,890/EG, 012/AS) should be grouped together as one group. Think of it in terms of a pie chart with those groups.
I've got a report built and I'm trying to figure out how sorting and grouping works. I can group the report by Patient, Albumin and it groups as I would expect.
Patient Date Albumin Adams, John 01/28/2007 4.1 Adams, John 12/30/2007 3.9 Adams, John 01/15/2007 3.2 Barker, Mark 01/18/2007 4.3 Barker, Mark 01/22/2007 4.1 Barker, Mark 01/05/2007 3.9
However, when I try to group by Albumin, Patient, it just sorts by Albumin. Patient Date Albumin Barker, Mark 01/18/2007 4.3 Adams, John 01/28/2007 4.1 Barker, Mark 01/22/2007 4.1 Adams, John 12/30/2007 3.9 Barker, Mark 01/05/2007 3.9 Adams, John 01/15/2007 3.2
What I'm looking for is this: Patient Date Albumin Barker, Mark 01/18/2007 4.3 Barker, Mark 01/22/2007 4.1 Barker, Mark 01/05/2007 3.9 Adams, John 01/28/2007 4.1 Adams, John 12/30/2007 3.9 Adams, John 01/15/2007 3.2
Is this something that can be done with grouping and sorting?
I'm really stumped on this one. I'm a self taught SQL guy, so there is probobly something I'm overlooking.
I'm trying to get information like this in to a report:
WO# -WO Line # --(Details) --Work Order Line Detail #1 --Work Order Line Detail #2 --Work Order Line Detail #3 --Work Order Line Detail #etc --(Parts) --Work Order Line Parts #1 --Work Order Line Parts #2 --Work Order Line Detail #etc WO# -WO Line # --(Details) --Work Order Line Detail #1 --Work Order Line Detail #2 --Work Order Line Detail #3 --Work Order Line Detail #etc --(Parts) --Work Order Line Parts #1 --Work Order Line Parts #2 --Work Order Line Parts #etc
I'm unable to get the grouping right on this. Since the line details and line parts both are children of the line #, how do you do "parallel groups"?
There are 4 tables:
Work Order Header Work Order Line Work Order Line Details Work Order Line Requisitions
The Header has a unique PK. The Line uses the Header and a Line # as foreign keys that together are unique. The Detail and requisition tables use the header and line #'s in addition to their own line number foreign keys. My queries ends up looking like this:
It probobly isn't best practice, but I'm kinda new so I need some guidance. I'd really appreciate any help! Here's my query:
SELECT [Work Order Header].No_ AS WO_No, [Work Order Line].[Line No_] AS WOL_No, [Work Order Requisition].[Line No_] AS WOLR_No, [Work Order Line Detail].[Line No_] AS WOLD_No FROM [Work Order Header] LEFT OUTER JOIN [Work Order Line] ON [Work Order Header].No_ = [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN [Work Order Line Detail] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order No_] AND [Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order Line No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN [Work Order Requisition] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order No_] AND [Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order Line No_]
I'm an SQL novice, but I know this must be a common problem.
I'm trying to select a recordset (using ASP), but I know I only want part of the recordset, and am not sure how to limit it ahead of time.
For example, the query will return about 500 rows, but I know I only want to use a small section of these records. I want to give the user the ability to navigate through small sections of these 500 rows without having to get all rows all the time. I know ahead of time which rows to get, but have no idea how to limit the recordset before I get it (there is no fields in the database to help).
This is what I'm doing now. "select * from xyz where id=xxx order by date desc;" I know I only want the first 10, or 10-20, or 400-410. The way I'm doing it now, I'm getting the whole recordset each time, doing a "rs.move x" where x is where I want to start. This is really a waste of network traffic and memory since my SQL server is on a different machine as the web server running ASP.
How do I do this?
Please email me if you could at pmt@vantagenet.com
Hello - I was wondering if anyone knew how to do this -
I have a database with a field for Id, LName, GName, DOB. In the LName field, some of the names have * placed after the names. Is there a way I can search for the entries in LName with the * in the record?
I have started a project using Linq for sql and SSCE. Everything goes well until I realize that SSCE can only run in full trust. Linq for sql is planned to support partial trust scenario. Any plans for such a support in Sql Compact Edition?
The following code accepts a couple of parameters and creates a temp table to hold unpaid schedule rows (like invoices). Then is takes the payment amount passed and starts paying the oldest ones first, until it runs out of money or pays a partial. When it pays it inserts a row in the applieds table with the schedule_ID, Receipt_ID (payment id), applied amount, and applied date. What I need help with is: Say there is a partial payment from a previous payment, I need to pay that one, but only the unpaid part. Then continue to pay other schedule rows... I appreciate any help, @PaymentAmount money,@PledgeID Int,@Receipt_ID IntAS-- Get unpaid reminder rows for the passed in pledge id and put them into the temp tableDeclare @temp_oldest Table(PledgeSchedule_ID int,ReminderDueDate datetime,AmountDue money)INSERT INTO @temp_oldest SELECT PledgeSchedule_ID, PledgeDueDate, AmountDueFROM tblPledgeReminderScheduleWHERE (dbo.tblPledgeReminderSchedule.Pledge_ID=@PledgeID) AND (dbo.tblPledgeReminderSchedule.ReceivedDate IS NULL) -- AND (dbo.tblPledgeReminderSchedule.PledgeDueDate < GETDATE())WHILE((SELECT Count(*) FROM @temp_oldest)>0)BEGIN-- If the payment is greater or equal to the amount due for the current row, do thisIF(@PaymentAmount >= (SELECT Top 1 AmountDue FROM @temp_oldest))BEGIN-- Update the reminder row with todays dateUPDATE tblPledgeReminderSchedule SET ReceivedDate = GETDATE()WHERE PledgeSchedule_ID = (SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID FROM @temp_oldest)-- Insert a row to track applied payment and reminder row associatedINSERT INTO tblPledgeReminderSchedule_Applieds (PledgeSchedule_ID,Receipt_ID,Applied_Amount,Applied_Date)(SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID,@Receipt_ID,AmountDue,GETDATE() FROM @temp_oldestWHERE PledgeSchedule_ID = (SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID FROM @temp_oldest))-- Subtract the amountdue from the paymentamount and reset itSET @PaymentAmount = (@PaymentAmount - (SELECT Top 1 AmountDue FROM @temp_oldest))ENDELSEIF(@PaymentAmount < (SELECT Top 1 AmountDue FROM @temp_oldest))BEGIN -- Insert a row to track applied PARTIAL payment and reminder row associatedINSERT INTO tblPledgeReminderSchedule_Applieds (PledgeSchedule_ID,Receipt_ID,Applied_Amount,Applied_Date)(SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID,@Receipt_ID,@PaymentAmount,GETDATE() FROM @temp_oldestWHERE PledgeSchedule_ID = (SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID FROM @temp_oldest))BREAKENDELSEIF @PaymentAmount = 0-- Delete all rows from temp tableDELETE FROM @temp_oldestELSE-- Delete only the current row from the temo tableprint @PaymentAmountDELETE FROM @temp_oldest WHERE PledgeSchedule_ID = (SELECT Top 1 PledgeSchedule_ID FROM @temp_oldest)END
I was just wondering if anyone could tell me how to do a search for a partial data match. Say one data field is 123, 234, 345, 456 and another is 111, 222, 333, 444 and another is 555, 666, 777, 888 and I want to search for the unique number 234 but not the whole number 123, 234, 345, 456 ... is there any way to do that or does every search have to be exactly like the data in the field? Thanks for any help. Dennis
In our database we have the concept of 'Companies' each company has an entry in a tblCompanyControls using a field lCompanyNumber to uniquely identify it.
Company specific data is then grouped within additional tables using this lCompanyNumber. Thus all the departments for a particular company (eg 4) exist in a table tblDepartments with lCompanyNumber =4. The same applies for pensions, pay elements, employees and so on.
Each employee has various attributes stored in several tables, thus the main data is stored in tblEmployees with an lCompanyNumber to illustrate the company they belong to. And a system generated lUniqueID that is the 1 to many relationship to tables such as tblEmployeePayElements, tblEmployeePensionSchemes.
These in turn have a primary key that establishes a 1 to many with the period data for pay elements etc.
What we want to do is replicate only the data for a specific company, for tblEmployees, tblDepartments this looks straightforward as i just set a filter like 'tblEmployees.lCompanyNumber = 4'. My problem is how do I replicate just the tblEmployeePayElements for those employees that are in the specific company as the table does not contain the lCompanyNumber. Can you replicate a view? I an quite ignorant of replication and would really appreciate some pointers. Note DRI is not in use.
I am serious problem of partial update my query is something like bEGIN tRAN declare cursor...
SElect * from tableA where flag = null
open cursor fetch first...
while @@FETCH_STATUS = 0 BEGIN UPDATE TABLE tableB .. . . .
fetch next END CLOSE ... DEALLOCATE.. COMMIT TRAN
The problem is the cursor select retrieves says about 10000 rows, goes thru the loop for 1000 rows and just terminates without giving an error message,or rolling back in case of errors, but comes out as successfully completed.
I am at loss as what could be the problems.. any suggestions welcome..
etc like that. each row varies with one exception. administrator@sthou.com is in each one.
is there a simple way thru sql or T-SQL to delete that "administrator@sthou.com" part? or should i call each row individually into say, a VB.net form using a split with the deliminator ";" and then looping thru and updating each row?
We have here 3 tables which are linked by Order number. there is one more table we need to use to get the Shipping zone code. This column however is 10 pos. ( the order number on that table)whilst the others are all 8. We want to join on MHORDR in the table MFH1MHL0, then we are done.
SELECT ALL T01.OHORDD, T03.IHINV#, T01.OHORDT, T01.OHJOB3, T01.OHORD#, T02.IDPRLC, T02.IDNTU$*(IDSHP#) AS EXTSHP, T02.IDPRT# FROM ASTDTA.OEORHDOH T01 LEFT OUTER JOIN ASTDTA.OEIND1 T02 ON T01.OHORD# = T02.IDORD# LEFT OUTER JOIN ASTDTA.OEINHDIH T03 ON T01.OHORD# = T03.IHORD# WHERE T01.OHOSTC = 'CL' AND T01.OHORDD >= 20120101 ORDER BY T01.OHORD# ASC
I have been asked to see what I can recover from a development server whose database became suspect during a power failure.
One developer from another group who's time is limited tried to repair the database using checkdb, but it is still suspect.
There are no recent backups of anything whatsoever. Needless to say, we are lacking in DBA skills here. At this point, we don't care whether we get the data back, but we are desperate to recover the table definitions, user-defined functions and stored procedures -- if not all of them than most of them; if not most of them than some.
What are our options here?
Are their any good third-party tools to help us with this problem?
Hi all,I have 2 files containing Id numbers and surnames (these filesessentially contain the same data) I want to select distinct() andjoin on id number to return a recordset containing every individuallisted in both the files HOWEVER, in some cases an incomplete IDnumber has been collected into one of the 2 files -is there a way tojoin on partial matches not just identical records in the same way asyou can select where LIKE '%blah, blah%'??Is hash joining an option i should investigate?TIAMark
Hi All,I have the following scenario. I have a table called Invoice. Thishas around 30 columns of which i have to do a retrieval based onfilter conditions on 10 columns. These filters need to be partialsearches i.e. for e.g the Customer name could be 'Arun', 'Parthiv','Aaron', now i should be able to search the customer as 'ar' and itshould return 'Arun' and 'Parthiv'. My concern is there are 10 columnson which this like '%x%' search has to be done and there willpractically be hudreds of thousands of rows. can anybody suggest me toimprove the performance of such a query. Currently what i am thinkinof isselect Id, Memo, .. FROM Invoice where CustomerName like '%' + @Name +'%' and etc.P.S. am using ASP.Net as the front end.
I have a file where there is a partial row at the end. It doesn't cause an error, but I get a "partial row" warning during execution.
What do most people do with these partial rows? Do they just ignore them as long as they don't cause errors? Or is it better to handle the partial row with a conditional split, for example?
Just wondering what other people's thoughts on this are. I tend to be of the "get rid of it" camp, but maybe that's overkill? Just looking for opinions, best practices.
Hi - I am using partial backup & restore on a Data Warehouse database currently in development.
When I recently tested the restore procedure I got the following error when trying to an online restore of one of the ReadOnly filegroups:
Msg 3125, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The database is using the simple recovery model. The data in the backup it is not consistent with the current state of the database. Restoring more data is required before recovery is possible. Either restore a full file backup taken since the data was marked read-only, or restore the most recent base backup for the target data followed by a differential file backup.
I believe I received this message as the Filegroup I was attempting to restore had been set ReadWrite since it was backed up.
So - I am looking for a query to test that all my filegroup backups are consistent with the live database.
I think I can achieve this by checking the read_write_lsn & read_only_lsn values for the filegroup to restore are the same as the values in sys.master_files for the live database.
I am reading the lsn values for the backup from msdb.dbo.backupfile
Can anyone confirm this is the correct approach? or is there a better way to do this??
I have a question, I keep getting the warning where the lookup found duplicate reference key values when caching reference data. It also says to switch over to partial or no cache mode. I switched to partial and and it took way longer to run my package. I have around 200,000 records right now but this table will continue to grow. I guess my question is which mode should I be using? I have another table that will have millions of records in it.
How can I "Order By" the second + third characters of a 7 char field ?
Sample data looks like:
LCA - L
LCB - L
LCF - M
LCE - M
LCE - A
LCA - A
LCB - A If I order by the whole field I get:
LCA - A
LCA - L
LCB - A
LCB - L
LCE - A
LCE - M
LCF - L
LCF - M What I want is:
LCA - L
LCB - L
LCF - L
LCA - A
LCB - A
LCE - A
LCE - M
LCF - M I'm still at the stage in this project were I can 'split' the field (if I have to) into first 3 and last 1. But the sort order of the last 1 is not alphabetic (I want 'L', 'A', "M"). Can I substitute a custom SortOrder some way ? (I've done that with mainframe Cobol). All suggestions appreciated. Thanks Roger
Hi there, actually I have a set of tables from my database model on SQL SERVER 2005 that I want to replicate (using merge replication) to a different server with SQL SERVER 2005 EXPRESS, Everything seems to be ok until I try so replicate just a portion of my model. I€™ve got some parent tables to replicate but I€™m not going to replicate some of their children, when I try to move them (just the parents and SOME children) to the other server using subscription, I have to erase some foreign keys (the children€™s foreign keys I wasn€™t supposed to migrate) in the target server to get my database migrated.
Is it possible to format just part of a field? I've got a report that return a collection of users based on some search criteria. Bascially, you enter a string and the report returns all users with a user name or display name simialr to your search string. I wanted to highlight the part of the name that matches the search string.
I'm testing mirroring in a high availability mode and getting some odd results. If I kill the SQL Service (or reboot the machine) fail-over works quickly and correctly. If I unplug the Network cable though I will get some of the databases failed over and some of the databases will either be Mirroring / In recovery or Principal / In recovery and never go live. Right clicking on them and going to properties lists there error that the database is unable to communicate with the Partner or Witness. The databases that this will occur on seem to move around (i.e. it isn't always the same databases, but will often be many of the same databases). If I reboot the databases that will not fail over tend to change fairly dramatically. I've seen instances where only 3 databases would fail over (I'm testing 17 databases) and other instances where all but 3 databases would fail over. I've had exactly one test where all databases failed over correctly. Again if I reboot a principal server, fail over works every time.
Has anyone else experienced only partial failovers for network issues or have a work around?
I have temporarily created a script that will force the databases to be the principal, but it's not great for high availability (probably will work for disaster recovery though).
I'll try to explain the situation as simply as I can. A master table exists that has several columns which can either contain trade IDs, or a joint ID of two trade IDs. These trade IDs exist for contracts. Contracts can contain many trades (e.g. Contract ABC is written for 40 trades). There exists a need for a list of documentation for these trades/contracts that must be taken from the master table, based off the trade ID, and if the documentation type matches a certain criteria. Because the users cannot understand a simple list of document IDs, added information about each document must be taken from trade/contract tables about each piece of documentation available. The problem is, two different types of documents can exist for the same contract, but we do NOT need documents for each trade in the contract. Currently, the stored procedure that someone else wrote is incredibly inefficient and regularly times the server out.
It begins by creating two identical tables (called "first" and "second" from here on) set up to hold all relevant info about these documents. It then selects into one table document IDs for all trades that can be found in all of the relevant columns in the master table, including trades found in "joint IDs." It then creates a cursor and selects each row, searching several different things based off the trade ID and updates the first table with these new values. This is the HUGE hangup because there are full table scans on a handful of tables about 4 times for every row in the table. Then, after it updates all the information in the first table, it goes about weeding out the duplicate entries by doing the following: Creates another cursor and does a distinct select on 4 columns which creates a unique ID to pull back exactly the right rows per contract per document from the first table. It then stores the information for all of the unique documents by inserting into the second table doing a "select top 1 * from firstTable where column1+column2+column3+column4 = 4DistinctColumnsFromFirstTable." This, as you can imagine creates another huge sink by inducing table scans from a table resident only in memory... AGAIN for every row. It finishes by selecting all rows from the second table. Now... what I've done so far, is I've managed to create a complex system of joins to grab all relevant information in one select (steps 1-4). I have not stored this information anywhere, nor have I used any cursors to do so (obviously as it is one select), but I imagine that I'll have to store all of this data and do a select on the stored data.
My question that would solve all of this is, can I do a partial distinct select? As in, can I select 7 columns where 4 of them are distinct without having to go through inserting into temp tables, using cursors, using top 1... etc. If not, is there some more efficient way of selecting out an entire batch of info based on only a few columns?
If you made it through that mess and decide to help me out, I sincerely appreciate your time....
