How To Merge Two Queries' Results?
Nov 12, 2007
hi,
my first query is:
"SELECT TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1 FROM TBL_STOK INNER JOIN" _
TBL_BARKOD ON TBL_STOK.stok_id = TBL_BARKOD.stok_id " _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod"
second query :
"SELECT TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1 FROM TBL_BARKOD left outer JOIN TBL_STOKDEPO ON TBL_BARKOD.stok_id = TBL_STOKDEPO.stok_id" _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod and TBL_STOKDEPO.depo_kod=@depokod "
i want to merge these queries' results.first query returns 2 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1)
second query returns 1 column (TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1) .but i want a query that returns 3 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1,TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1)
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,Here is my problem, I have 3 tables :People-------------IDPeopleFirstnameLastnameCars------------IDPeopleCarnameBoats------------IDPeopleBoatname1 person can have 0 or n car/boatI want to a result set displaying : Firstname, Lastname, NumberOfCars,NumberOfBoatsI have two queries, but i want to merge the results in one. how can i dothis ?This one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and CARCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Cars.CarName) AS CARCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Cars ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Cars.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThis one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and BOATCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Boats.BoatName) AS BOATCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Boats ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Boats.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThanks in advancePhil
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2015
We have two queries that run nightly and we'd like to combine them and only have one result set instead of two. What's the best way to combine these? The only difference is the Table the information is being pulled from.
Query 1:
set nocount on
select
case
when datalength(MICRACCTNUMBER) = 4 then convert(char(20),('001 000000000000'+MICRACCTNUMBER))
when datalength(MICRACCTNUMBER) = 5 then convert(char(20),('001 00000000000'+MICRACCTNUMBER))
when datalength(MICRACCTNUMBER) = 6 then convert(char(20),('001 0000000000'+MICRACCTNUMBER))
[code].....
Again, the only difference is the Table the info is coming from...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2006
I have a requirement to create a file containing security Index and Index Component data (think Dow Jones Industrial Average and the 30 securities that make up the index). The format of the file is for the first index to be listed first (with some pricing data) and then followed by each of its components on a separate line. After that comes the second index and then its components.
So, given:
index IN1 with COM1, COM2
index IN2 with COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6
index IN3 with COM7, COM8, COM9
I want:
IN1
IN1COM1
IN1COM2
IN2
IN2COM3
IN2COM4
IN2COM5
IN2COM6
IN3
etc.
Using DTS, my solution was to output each query to a temporary file and then use an ActiveX Script Task to loop through the rows and output the data in the correct order in a single file.
Is there a better solution using SSIS? I see that if I still need to use scripting, I can at the minimum send the queries to Recordset Destinations instead of the temporary files. (I am assuming that since Recordset is available as a destination, then it is accessible through code...)
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2004
Hi,
I would like to use the result table of the first query in a number of other queries. How do I do this ?
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2005
I have created a search interface for a large table and I allow users to search on keywords. The users can enter multiple keywords and I build a SQL based on their input to search a full-text indexed table. However the users want to be able to search like an old system they had, where they enter single words and then combine their searches to drill-down into the results. What would be the best method to combine searches?At the moment I can create a merged query from 2 queries if they have searched using single words, but I know down the line it will get far more complicated if they keep combining and merging even with multiple word entries. Each time they search I store the 'where' section of each query, then if they choose to combine I have a function to build a new query through arrays (to eliminate duplicates and sort etc)Is there a better way in SQL to combine queries as sometimes the logic of the combined query means no results are returned (because of OR/ AND conditions in the wrong places etc)e.g.1. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"run"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"run"'))2. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"level"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"level"'))Combined using my function creates:Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (contains(title,'"level"') AND contains(title,'"run"')) OR (contains(subject,'"level"') AND contains(subject,'"run"'))
When I combine I'm drilling down, so if the first query returns a count of 400 (where the title OR subject contains 'run') and then the second query returns 600 records (where the title OR subject contains 'level') I need to combine so that I'm looking for records where the title contains both keywords 'run' AND 'level' OR else the subject contains both 'run' AND 'level' and I end up with say 50 records where the title has both keywords OR the subject holds both words. I think the main trouble lies if they try combine a previously combines search with a new search. here my logic gets totally thrown and I'm not sure how to handle soemthing like this. Has anyone got any ideas or experience with this kind of functionality? In SQL or even in vb.net is there a method to combine searches easily?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2005
I'm trying to create a list of orders in my db that has been created correctly (some orders are not dealt with correctly...) An order should go from "open -> assigned" to "assigned -> responded" status.
I got the following query:
select org.name, count(order) AS correct, NULL AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
where
o1.status = 'Open -> Assigned'
and o2.status = 'Assigned -> Responded'
and o1.time_stamp < o2.time_stamp
This gives me a list of all organisations with the correct number of orders in the system...
But now I need to add the total number of tickets they got in the system. So I was thinking about a union with a query without the were constraints
UNION 'with the above query
select org.name, NULL AS correct, count(order) AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
..but that gives me a list like this:
name correct total
org1 324 NULL
org1 NULL 423
How can I combine them, or maybe doing it a better way?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2007
Hi,
I have to queries that return tables with the same names. How do i add these 2 so it returns one table?
Thanks for your help.
Mike
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Does anyone know how I can 'join' the results ofone SQL query to the bottom of another?Eg. I have two queries:1. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithNAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve Smith2. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = JonesNAME SURNAMEBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesWhat I want to produce is:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve SmithBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesHowever, if I use UNION like this:SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithUNIONSELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = Jonesit mixes up all the results:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithBob JonesJohn SmithLarry JonesMichael SmithSteve SmithTom Jones(I guess it's sorting by the first field, NAME).Is there a way to stop it sorting the results, so that itjust tacks the second query results to the bottom of thefirst query results?(I realise I could use "ORDER BY Surname" to get the same resultin this simple example, but for the more complicated queriesI want to use it won't work).Thanks for any help,Matt.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2008
Hi,
I am new to MDX and I have created a query listed below, this returns the correct information from the cube. However when I split the query into a CREATE SET and Query the data returned is wrong. I need to include the set creation in the cube but this returns the wrong information. I thought that information returned by these two queries would be indentical can anyone explain please.
Thanks David
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0) on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
create SET [Finance].[LFL Stores List] AS
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0)
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
[LFL Stores List] on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2008
Hello all,
I have been using T-SQL for a while now although the majority of my work required relativley simple queries.
I just need to know is there a way to JOIN the results of several SELECT queries, maybe through the use of functions??
A reference to any online article would be most helpful.
Cheers,
Sean
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I'm trying to devise a query for use on SQL Server 2000 that will dowhat was previously done with one query in MS Access. The MS Accessquery was like this:SELECT Count(*) as [Opened],Abs(Sum([Status] Like 'Cancel*')) As [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Order By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Here were I'm at with SQL Server, TSQLSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Opened]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yieldsMonthOpened======================Aug 2004503Sep 2004752Oct 2004828Nov 2004658Dec 2004533Jan 2005736Feb 2005707Mar 2005797Apr 2005412AndSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus like 'Cancelled%'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yields;MonthCancelled=========================Aug 200478Sep 2004105Oct 2004121Nov 2004106Dec 200475Jan 200582Feb 200571Mar 200594Apr 200533What is desired isMonthOpenedCancelled============================Aug 200450378Sep 2004752105Oct 2004828121Nov 2004658106Dec 200453375Jan 200573682Feb 200570771Mar 200579794Apr 200541233Any assistance would be appreciated.Cheers;Bill
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
What is the best way to go about merging the results of two fields inthe same table?I have two different fields that hold lists of names, some of themidentical, some different. From those I'd like to generate a mergedlist with all the distinct names.For example:Field1 contains: Jack, Joe, Jim, PaulField2 contains: Peter, Paul, Joe, JimThe result should be: Jack, Joe, Jim, Peter, Paul
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2012
Customers order a product and enter in a source code (sourceCd). This sourceCd is tied to a marketing program. Idea being we can see that 100 customers ordered from this promo, 200 from this catalog, etc etc. The sourceCd that a customer enters is not always accurate so there is a magic process that adjusts this OrigSourceCd into a final SourceCd, that may or may not be the same.
I am trying to generate a result set of customer count by sales program based on both the original and final source code. Problem is, I have to do each query separately because in one, I have to join SourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with that SourceCd and in the other i have to join OrigSourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with the original sourceCd. There are some programs is one results set that are not in the other, and vice versa.
I'm trying to generate a list of that shows customer counts before and after for each program, some which may be null for one, but have counts for the other. I have tries creating 2 separating views and joining them but that doesn't work because it only returns the ones they have in common.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2012
I am running a SQL stored procedure which runs 3 queries on 3 different SQL tables. What is my best option to export the results of these 3 queries to excel?
If it matters they are all SELECT queries, and at most will return < 500 rows.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2015
I have made a couple of queries I want to use into a Visual studio project, Now is my problem:
All my queries have different statements. I believe the best is to show the results in a Datagridview
How to view them there? I know how to do it... but I have got about 30 queries
Here is my code so far:
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
ComboBox1.DataSource = MyDB_DevDataSet.DataSetName.
Dim connectionString As String = "Data Source=myDBmySRV;Initial Catalog=Teknotrans_dev;Integrated Security=True"
Dim sql As String = "SELECT * FROM CompanyMain"
[Code] ....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2005
Hello,I am trying to create a view that shows the followingField1: Sum of Amounts from Table AField2: Count of Amounts from Table AField3: Sum of of Amounts from Table BField4: Count of Amounts from Table B......Field3: Sum of of Amounts from Table HField4: Count of Amounts from Table H......Things are a bit more complex but this is the gist.I am using SQL 2000.I know how to do this pretty easily using a stored procedure. But howcan I do it in a view? A SQL server won't meet my needs in thissituation.I tried OpenQuery ('myserver', 'exec myprocedure') but get the messagethat my server is not configured for data access. I tried the systemstored procedure to set data access to true but nothing seemed tohappen.I also tried Select * from (Select Statement1, select statement2)but got syntax error at the comma between statement1 and statement2.Trying to use select Statement1 as ABC to does not seem to work either.Is there a way to do what I want without making 15 views and then afinal view that shows them all together? I know I could probably dosomething by creating a ton of functions, but it really seems thisshould not be that hard...I am definitely open to any easy suggestions!Thanks,Ryan
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Hi,
We have a client who runs SQL Server 2000 queries on one database server and performance is approx. 4 seconds. If the database is backed up, no tables in the query or indexes on these tables are modified (we may run a small script that affects stored procedures, views, etc.) the query can run virtually forever.
The customer is runing a cluster and we are running a stand-alone. Although, the two environments that they run in and have these wildly different results in are the same.
The queries are not worth listing (join a couple of tables and views, select a few columns, put on a few conditions--nothing crazy).
Is this normal behavior for MS SQL Server?
I've personally seen where a database is backed up and query plans and performance are different from one server to another, but we are looking at extreme cases here. In fact, on the second server, the majority of the queries are faster and only a couple run very slowly.
Also, the query optimizer seems to be making poor decisions at this custoemer. For example, two tables will be cross joined (forming over 200 million records) and then table scans ensue. The process in some cases will take a 4 second query to 45 minutes.
To me none of this makes any sense. I've been working with SQL Server since 1997 and have not experienced any type of performance problems or variances of this magnitude. Although this is a 6GB database, SQL Server 7 ran on a terabyte without even blinking, so I wouldn't understand why this would have anything to do with it.
Also hampering our efforts is that we do not have easy access to this SQL Server database to get our hands on it and debug these issues.
Does anyone know of a way to examine these issues in a "system wide" manner to determine what the problems could be since the problems are not specific to the database (i.e. .bak file) but seem to be specific to the server?
They have also had database corruption (an index that wouldn't update) and had to roll back the database. Would that indicate that the MDF/LDF's are unstable? Is there a way to figure out if there is some type of MDF/LDF file structure corruption?
Thanks,
Henry.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
I'm having difficulty coming up with the right syntax for a query. Suppose I have a database containing a Stores table, an ProductInventory table, and a Customers table. The Stores table has an ID field that serves as a foreign key in both the ProductInventory table and in the Customers table. I'm trying to write a query that, for each Store record, will return the total number of records in the ProductInventory table and the total number of records in the Customers table.
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the ProductInventory table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the Customers table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
I combined the two queries:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
LEFT JOIN Customers ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
When I run this last query, however, I get an "Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int" error. Using COUNT_BIG instead of COUNT eliminates the error, but the numbers that are generated are astronomical in size. This indicates to me that there is a *lot* more table joining going on than I expected
What is the correct syntax to produce the desired results? I have a few other tables similar to ProductInventory and Customers; I'm hoping to extend the correct syntax so as to be able to get a comprehensive record count list for each store. Thanks for your help!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2014
So I'm trying out full-text indexing for the first time and, in particular, FileTables in SQL Server 2012. I've followed a Microsoft walkthrough and everything seems to be ok. However, when I query the table using the CONTAINS keyword, I get no results (a regular query to make sure there are records in the table returns the expected number of results).
I'm now trying to troubleshoot, and have been using the FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY function, but I don't understand the results.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatlogName',N'ItemCount'), I get a result of 51. There are 96 documents in the NTFS folder where the documents are stored, and the table has 96 records, so I don't know where 51 is coming from. 55 of the documents are .DOC files, the rest are .PDF, and some (or maybe all) of the PDFs are scanned images of documents, which I don't expect to be indexed, so maybe that explains it. And in another thread in these forums, a poster suggests that the result for this function should be either 0 or 1, with 0 meaning that no documents are pending indexing, but maybe I've misunderstood that.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatalogName',N'UniqueKeyCount'), I get a result of 2. I have got two full-text indexes in this catalog (one on the FileTable, one on a regular table with FT enabled). Is this result therefore expected? Again, reading online seems to suggest that a result of 0 is desirable, but I don't understand why, and if it is I don't understand why my result is 2!
I've now also run SELECT* FROM sys.dm_fts_index_keywords(DB_ID('DatabaseName'), Object_ID('dbo.FileTableName)), which I believe is supposed to list all of the indexed words from the table specified. I get one row returned, as follows:
keyword: 0xFF
display_term: END OF FILE
column_id: 2
document_count: 40
So basically, it's not indexed any words at all. And why is the document count only 40 when there are 96 documents in the folder and table?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2015
I have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2015
I want to get output of below query in single row.
Select 'Name'
Select 'Surname'
Expected output is Name,Surname
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2014
In the T-SQL below, I retrieved data from two queries and I've tried to join them to create a report in SSRS 2008 R2. The SQL runs, but I can't create a report from it. (I also couldn't get this query to run in an Excel file that connects to my SQL Server data base. I've used other T-SQL queries in this Excel file and they run fine.) I think that's because I am creating temporary tables. How do I modify my SQL so that I can get the same result without creating temporary tables?
/*This T-SQL gets the services for the EPN download from WITS*/
-- Select services entered in the last 20 days along with the MPI number and program code.
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.group_session_client.note, dbo.group_session_client.error_note, dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id,
dbo.group_session_client.group_session_client_id, dbo.group_session.signed_note, dbo.group_session.unsigned_note
into #temp_group_sessions
FROM dbo.group_session_client, dbo.group_session
WHERE dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id = dbo.group_session.group_session_id
-- Select group notes
SELECT DISTINCT
dbo.client_ssrs.state_client_number, dbo.delivered_service_detail.program_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_date,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_time,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.service_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.cpt_code, dbo.delivered_service_detail.icd9_code_primary,
[code]....
-- Form an outer join selecting all services with any group notes attached to them.
select * from #temp_services
LEFT OUTER JOIN #temp_group_sessions
on #temp_services.group_session_client_id = #temp_group_sessions.group_session_client_id
;
-- Drop temporary tables
DROP TABLE #temp_group_sessions;
DROP TABLE #temp_services;
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
Hi All,
I have two SQL queries that we would like to automate. Ideally we want them to both be scheduled to run and dump their results to a single Excel spreadsheet with two workbooks, one for each query
Is it possible to do this? If not, sending each query to a seperate XLS or CSV file would be OK
Here are the queries:
SELECT p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_type, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.date_created, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number, po_line.created_by, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_desc, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_received, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_vouched, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.order_date, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.location_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_name, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.extended_cost_home
FROM P21.dbo.p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report, P21.dbo.po_line po_line
WHERE po_line.po_no = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no AND po_line.line_no = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number
and
SELECT p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_type, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.date_created, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no, contacts.last_name, p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.buyer_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_desc, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_received, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_vouched, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.order_date, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.location_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_name, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.extended_cost_home
FROM P21.dbo.contacts contacts, P21.dbo.p21_view_inventory_return_hdr p21_view_inventory_return_hdr, P21.dbo.p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report
WHERE p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.return_number = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no AND contacts.id = p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.buyer_id
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2007
Hi
I have a strange issue here.
Both the input datasets of the merge join are sorted . Everything works fine if the dataset doesn't contain speacial characters like - (hipen).
This is the sorted dataset.ASI311_3ASI311_3ASI312ASI311ASIKit1ASIKit1
Merge Joiner has to look for ASI311 and finds it in the list and everything works as expected. But if the dataset is changed to
ASI311_3ASI311_3ASI-312ASI311ASIKit1ASIKit1
Then it doesn't find the ASI311 in the above dataset ?
Only change between the two datasets is the - (hipen) which is added in one of the field. Does SSIS has a differenent precedence of the special characters than that of the Database. Both the datasets are on SQLServer.
Can anyone point out the issue here?
Thankyou
Vidya
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2005
I have implemented replication between 2 servers (SERVER1 AND SERVER2) and for test purposes i just have 1 table(Table1) in the publisher.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I have database on SQL Server 2000 set up with a merge publication.This publication is configured with a number of dynamic filters toreduce the amount of data sent to each client. Each client has ananonymous pull subscription. The merge process can be triggered by thewindows sync manager and my application.To improve performance I have created some helper tables to hold themapping between user login and primary keys of selected entities.For the replicated data to be correct the contents of the helper tablesneeds to be up to date.I need to fire off a stored procedure on the publisher beforereplication starts to verify that this data is up to date. I can notsee any documented way of doing this however I have been experimentingwith some unorthodox systems.Firstly has anyone any ideas?I have been considering adding a trigger to some of the tables used bythe Microsoft replication code - yes I know this is very nasty.My problems arise because executing this stored procedure will causesome data to be updated. In updating data we could create a newgeneration in the database. I must therefore run my stored procedurebefore any the Microsoft code makes any generation checks / updates.Anyone done anything similar, Anyone have any better ideas?Any comments would be gratefully received.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2004
Hi,
I'm using merge replication to maintain a backup copy of my main (publisher)MSDE database. A push subscription periodically (1 per minute) updates the backup DB.
It's intended that if the main db goes down then the backup (subscription) db can be configured as a publisher. This must all be performed via scripting.
The initial configuration of the main publisher and subscription is controlled via scripting, which works fine.
The problems occur when I try to configure the subsciber to become a publisher. A script is executed on the subscriber but fails at the point when it's configuring the publisher detail. The error is something like "unable to configure a publication for a database setup as an anonymous subscription".
I'm guessing that there are subscritpion artifacts added to the database which need to be removed before it can be configured as a new publisher.
Please help,
Jez W
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2007
hi, like, if i need to do delete some items with the id = 10000 then also need to update on the remaining items on the with the same idthen i will need to go through all the records to fetch the items with the same id right? so, is there something that i can use to hold those records so that i can do the delete and update just on those records and don't need to query twice? or is there a way to do that in one go ?thanks in advance!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2015
I have four tables: Customer (CustomerId INT, CountyId INT), County (CountyId INT), Search(SearchId INT), and SearchCriteria (SearchCriteriaId INT, SearchId INT, CountyId INT, [others not related to this]).
I want to search Customer based off of the Search record, which could have multiple SearchCriteria records. However, if there aren't any SearchCriteria records with CountyId populated for a given Search, I want it to assume to get all Customer records, regardless of CountyId.
Right now, I'm doing it this way.
DECLARE @SearchId INT = 100
SELECT * FROM Customer WHERE
CountyId IN
(
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS(SELECT CountyId FROM SearchCriteria WHERE SearchId = @SearchId)
THEN SearchCriteria.CountyId
[Code] .....
This works; it just seems cludgy. Is there a more elegant way to do this?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2008
Hello. I currently have a website that has a table on one webpage. When a record is clicked, the primary key of that record is transfered in the query string to another page and fed into an sql statement. In this case its selecting a project on the first page, and displaying all the scripts for that project on another page. I also have an additional dropdownlist on the second page that i use to filter the scripts by an attribute called 'testdomain'. At present this works to an extent. When i click a project, i am navigated to the scripts page which is empty except for the dropdownlist. i then select a 'testdomain' from the dropdownlist and the page populates with scripts (formview) for the particular test domain. what i would like is for all the scripts to be displayed using the formview in the first instance when the user arrives at the second page. from there, they can then filter the scripts using the dropdownlist.
My current SQL statement is as follows.
SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [TestScript] WHERE (([ProjectID] = @ProjectID) AND ([TestDomain] = @TestDomain))"
So what is happening is when testdomain = a null value, it does not select any scripts. Is there a way i can achieve the behaivour of the page as i outlined above? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
James.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
Hi All,
I have a stored proc which is executing successfully...but the results of that stored proc are displaying in the Messages Tab instaed of results Tab. And in the Results Tab the results shows as 0..So, Any clue friends..it is very urgent..I am trying to call this stored proc in my Report in SSRS as well but the stored proc is not displaying there also...Please help me ASAP..
Thanks
dotnetdev1
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2008
Hi all, I have the following SQLDataSource statement which connects to my Gridview:<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSourceStandings" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString %>" SelectCommand="SELECT P.firstName, P.lastName, T.teamName, IsNull(P.gamesPlayed, 0) as gamesPlayed, IsNull(P.plateAppearances,0) as plateAppearances, IsNull( (P.plateAppearances - (P.sacrifices + P.walks)) ,0) as atbats, IsNull(P.hits,0) as hits, P.hits/(CONVERT(Decimal(5,2), IsNull(NullIF(P.atbats, 0), 1))) AS [average], (P.hits + P.walks)/(CONVERT(Decimal(5,2), IsNull(NullIF( (P.atbats + P.sacrifices + P.walks) , 0), 1))) AS [OBP], (P.hits - (P.doubles + P.triples + P.homeRuns) + (2 * P.doubles) + (3 * P.triples) + (4 * P.homeRuns)) / (CONVERT(Decimal(5,2), IsNull(NullIF(P.atbats, 0), 1))) AS [SLG], P.singles, P.doubles, P.triples, P.homeRuns, P.walks, P.sacrifices, P.runs, P.rbis FROM Players P INNER JOIN Teams T ON P.team = T.teamID ORDER BY P.firstName, P.lastName"></asp:SqlDataSource>There are 8 teams in the database, and somehow the average and obp results are as expected for all teams except where T.teamID = 1. This doesn't make sense to me at all! For example, I get the following results with this same query: First NameLast NameTeamGPPAABHAVGOBPSLG1B2B3BHRBBSACRRBI
BrianAustinHope83432230.7187500.7352941.15625014612201221
GabrielHelbigSafe Haven62119141.0000000.9375002.1428576404111519
MarkusJavorSafe Haven82927200.8695650.8000001.21739114501021218
RobBennettMelville83029240.8275860.8333331.55172411904102117
AdamBiesenthalSafe Haven82929210.9130430.9130431.56521712631001015
ErikGalvezMelville82625180.7200000.7307691.24000011322101015 As you can see, all teams except for Safe Haven's have the correct AVG and OBP. Since AVG is simply H/AB, it doesn't make sense for Gabriel Helbig's results to be 1.00000. Can anyone shed ANY light on this please?Thank you in advance,Markuu ***As a side note, could anyone also let me know how I could format the output so that AVG and OBP are only 3 decimal places? (ex: 0.719 for the 1st result)***
View 2 Replies
View Related
