Hi!
I need to refresh an entire database.
I can recompile SPs with sp_recompile (or DBCC FLUSHPROCINDB), and
refresh views with sp_refreshView, but I cannot find any way to
refresh my user-defined functions (some of them are like views, with
parameters).
Any help appreciated :) !
Ben
Is there a way (command or stored procedure) to RECOMPILE or REFRESH a USER DEFINED FUNCTION? I can recompile SPs with sp_recompile and refresh views with sp_refreshView, but I could not find any way to refresh User-defined functions (some of them are like views, with parameters).
Environment: SQL 2005 SP2.
Thanks !
I know that all the documentation always tells you that sp_recompile will force a stored procedure to recompile the next time it is executed. However, I am not seeing the recompiles in a SQL Trace, when capturing SP: Recompile events. I have tried this on many different database servers, using sp_recompile and also the WITH RECOMPILE option when creating the proc.
Can anyone explain this?
How would I go about tracing UDF performance in profiler? I'd like to
specifically know the impact of the UDF without having to dig into the
execution plan of the statement containing it. Is this possible?
Can changes made to replicated stored procedures (and User-defined Functions) on the Publisher update the Subscriber database?
If I ALTER a SP (or UDF) on Database1 with peer-to-peer Transaction Replication to Database2, will the alter replicate to the Subscriber(s)?
Thomas
ThomBeaux
I know there is a lot of information already out there on this topic,but given the following scenario...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Create a view like so ( pardon the pseudo-code )...CREATE View vwContactAddressesSelect * FROM Contact INNER JOIN Address ON Contact.ContactID =Address.ContactIDAnd then do a sargable select from the view using a stored procedureCREATE STORED PROCEDURE spSelect_ContactAddresses@ContactID intASSelect * FROM vwContactAddresses WHERE ContactID = @ContactID--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In my understanding, "vwContactAddresses" would be substituted with theactual SQL join statement when the view is accessed.So for the stored procedure in question an execution plan for"Select * FROM Contact INNER JOIN Address ON Contact.ContactID =Address.ContactID WHERE ContactID = @ContactID" would be cached.Correct?With regards to execution plan caching, is this not the same ascreating an inline UDF that takes parameters or just creating a storedprocedure that would do the join w/out the view reference?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
What is the difference between a computed column and a UDF?
Is a computed column the same as the "Formula" field under Design Table in Enterprise Manager?
Also, what is the proper syntax for the Formula field? Can I use regular SQL on it or is there more to it?
thanks,
Frank
-- Author: Igor Nikiforov, Montreal, EMail: udfs@sympatico.ca
-- GETWORDCOUNT() User-Defined Function Counts the words in a string.
-- GETWORDCOUNT(@cString[, @cDelimiters])
-- Parameters
-- @cString nvarchar(4000) - Specifies the string whose words will be counted.
-- @cDelimiters nvarchar(256) - Optional. Specifies one or more optional characters used to separate words in @cString.
-- The default delimiters are space, tab, carriage return, and line feed. Note that GETWORDCOUNT( ) uses each of the characters in @cDelimiters as individual delimiters, not the entire string as a single delimiter.
-- Return Value smallint
-- Remarks GETWORDCOUNT() by default assumes that words are delimited by spaces or tabs. If you specify another character as delimiter, this function ignores spaces and tabs and uses only the specified character.
-- If you use 'AAA aaa, BBB bbb, CCC ccc.' as the target string for dbo.GETWORDCOUNT(), you can get all the following results.
-- declare @cString nvarchar(4000)
-- set @cString = 'AAA aaa, BBB bbb, CCC ccc.'
-- select dbo.GETWORDCOUNT(@cString, default) -- 6 - character groups, delimited by ' '
-- select dbo.GETWORDCOUNT(@cString, ',') -- 3 - character groups, delimited by ','
-- select dbo.GETWORDCOUNT(@cString, '.') -- 1 - character group, delimited by '.'
-- See Also GETWORDNUM() User-Defined Function
-- UDF the name and functionality of which correspond to the same built-in function of Visual FoxPro
CREATE function GETWORDCOUNT (@cSrting nvarchar(4000), @cDelimiters nvarchar(256) )
returns smallint
as
begin
-- if no break string is specified, the function uses spaces, tabs and line feed to delimit words.
set @cDelimiters = isnull(@cDelimiters, space(1)+char(9)+char(10))
declare @p smallint, @end_of_string smallint, @wordcount smallint
select @p = 1, @wordcount = 0
select @end_of_string = 1 + datalength(@cSrting)/(case SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@cSrting,'BaseType') when 'nvarchar' then 2 else 1 end) -- for unicode
while dbo.CHARINDEX_BIN(substring(@cSrting, @p, 1), @cDelimiters, 1) > 0 and @end_of_string > @p -- skip opening break characters, if any
set @p = @p + 1
if @p < @end_of_string
begin
set @wordcount = 1 -- count the one we are in now count transitions from 'not in word' to 'in word'
-- if the current character is a break char, but the next one is not, we have entered a new word
while @p < @end_of_string
begin
if @p +1 < @end_of_string and dbo.CHARINDEX_BIN(substring(@cSrting, @p, 1), @cDelimiters, 1) > 0 and dbo.CHARINDEX_BIN(substring(@cSrting, @p+1, 1), @cDelimiters, 1) = 0
select @wordcount = @wordcount + 1, @p = @p + 1 -- Skip over the first character in the word. We know it cannot be a break character.
set @p = @p + 1
end
end
return @wordcount
end
GO
-- Author: Igor Nikiforov, Montreal, EMail: udfs@sympatico.ca
-- GETWORDNUM() User-Defined Function
-- Returns a specified word from a string.
-- GETWORDNUM(@cString, @nIndex[, @cDelimiters])
-- Parameters @cString nvarchar(4000) - Specifies the string to be evaluated
-- @nIndex smallint - Specifies the index position of the word to be returned. For example, if @nIndex is 3, GETWORDNUM( ) returns the third word (if @cString contains three or more words).
-- @cDelimiters nvarchar(256) - Optional. Specifies one or more optional characters used to separate words in @cString.
-- The default delimiters are space, tab, carriage return, and line feed. Note that GetWordNum( ) uses each of the characters in @cDelimiters as individual delimiters, not the entire string as a single delimiter.
-- Return Value nvarchar(4000)
-- Remarks Returns the word at the position specified by @nIndex in the target string, @cString. If @cString contains fewer than @nIndex words, GETWORDNUM( ) returns an empty string.
-- See Also
-- GETWORDCOUNT() User-Defined Function
-- UDF the name and functionality of which correspond to the same built-in function of Visual FoxPro
CREATE function GETWORDNUM (@cSrting nvarchar(4000), @nIndex smallint, @cDelimiters nvarchar(256) )
returns nvarchar(4000)
as
begin
-- if no break string is specified, the function uses spaces, tabs and line feed to delimit words.
set @cDelimiters = isnull(@cDelimiters, space(1)+char(9)+char(10))
declare @i smallint, @j smallint, @p smallint, @q smallint, @qmin smallint, @end_of_string smallint, @LenDelimiters smallint, @outstr nvarchar(4000)
select @i = 1, @p = 1, @q = 0, @outstr = ''
select @end_of_string = 1 + datalength(@cSrting)/(case SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@cSrting,'BaseType') when 'nvarchar' then 2 else 1 end) -- for unicode
select @LenDelimiters = datalength(@cDelimiters)/(case SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@cDelimiters,'BaseType') when 'nvarchar' then 2 else 1 end) -- for unicode
while @i <= @nIndex
begin
while dbo.CHARINDEX_BIN(substring(@cSrting, @p, 1), @cDelimiters, 1) > 0 and @end_of_string > @p -- skip opening break characters, if any
set @p = @p + 1
if @p >= @end_of_string
break
select @j = 1, @qmin = @end_of_string -- find next break character it marks the end of this word
while @j <= @LenDelimiters
begin
set @q = dbo.CHARINDEX_BIN(substring(@cDelimiters, @j, 1), @cSrting, @p)
set @j = @j + 1
if @q > 0 and @qmin > @q
set @qmin = @q
end
if @i = @nIndex -- this is the actual word we are looking for
begin
set @outstr = substring(@cSrting, @p, @qmin-@p)
break
end
set @p = @qmin + 1
if (@p >= @end_of_string)
break
set @i = @i + 1
end
return @outstr
end
GO
-- Is similar to the built-in function Transact-SQL charindex, but regardless of collation settings,
-- executes case-sensitive search
-- Author: Igor Nikiforov, Montreal, EMail: udfs@sympatico.ca
CREATE function CHARINDEX_BIN(@expression1 nvarchar(4000), @expression2 nvarchar(4000), @start_location smallint = 1)
returns nvarchar(4000)
as
begin
return charindex( cast(@expression1 as nvarchar(4000)) COLLATE Latin1_General_BIN, cast(@expression2 as nvarchar(4000)) COLLATE Latin1_General_BIN, @start_location )
end
GO
Hi,
I have written an udf that checks for validations of an email address and returns 0 / 1 as per the validations. I came across an artical on MSDN that describes the steps to make my own system udf. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsqlpro01/html/sql01l1.asp
with help of that artical, I made my udf as a system udf. and now I can use it as follows.
select * , fn_isvalidemail(email) from #tp
now, I wanted to use this as a declarative check constraints in my tables. so I tried
create table testtable
( email_addr varchar (255) null CONSTRAINT CK_email_chk CHECK ( fn_isvalidemail(email) = 1) )
although this is syntax is logically correct, it does not get compiled
it gives me an error saying,
Server: Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Line 2
'fn_isvalidemail' is not a recognized function name.
the strange part is that i made the function as another normal udf, It works in declarative constraints.
create table testtable
( email varchar (255) null CONSTRAINT CK_1p12 CHECK ( dbo.isvalidemail(email) = 1) )
Any thoughts on this ?
- Amit
I have always learn that UDFs are not Pre-Compiled while Stored procedures are. But I always had this questions why are UDFs are not Pre-Compiled.
I searched online for the answer but dint get an concrete justification on the same.
Hello,
How can I call UDFs on linked servers in SQL Server 2005?
More details:
I have some UDFs on Instance "VAXPServerA" in Database "DB1", for example "getSomething(number)".
It might look like this (for example):
----
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[getSomething] (
@theNumber int
)
RETURNS int AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @result int
SET @result = theNumber * 5
RETURN @result
END
----
I can call this function inside of the DB by typing:
----
SELECT dbo.getSomething(5)
----
I also can call the function from another DB on instance "VAXPServerA" by typing:
----
SELECT DB1.dbo.getSomething(5)
----
I have a second instance called "VAXPServerB", and "VAXPServerA" is a linked server in "VAXPServerB". I can do selects and stuff, it works fine.
But when I want to call the function...
----
SELECT [VAXPServerA].DB1.dbo.getSomething(5)
----
I obtain the next error:
Msg. 207, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The column name 'VAXPServerA' is not valid.
Any hint?
Thanks in advance
David
I have a bunch of SPs that all rely on a UDF that parses a commadelimitted list of numbers into a table. Everything was working fine,but now my application is growing and I'm starting to approach the 8000character limit of the varChar variable used to store the list.I would like to change the UDF only and avoid having to dig through allof my stored procedures. I was hoping to use the text datatype toallow for much larger lists, but I am unable to perform anymanipulations necessary to parse the list into a table. I have triedPATINDEX, but it alone is not enough without the text maniuplations andI don't think the sp_xml_preparedocument can be used in a UDF.Anyone with any thoughts on managing large arrays in t-sql?thanks,Matt Weiner
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello Folks,I encountered a problem with SQL server 2000 and UDFs.I have a scalar UDF and a table UDF where I would like the scalar UDFto provide the argument for the table UDF like in:SELECT*FROMtransaction_tWHEREtrxn_gu_id in (select get_trxns_for_quarter(get_current_quarter( GetDate() ) ))'get_current_quarter' returns an integer which is a GUID in a tablecontaining business quarter definitions, like start date, end date.'get_current_quarter' is a scalar UDF.'get_trxns_for_quarter' will then get all transctions that fall intothat quarter and return their GUID's in a table.'get_trxns_for_quarter' is a table UDF.This doesn't seem to work at all. Regardless whether I provide thenamespace (schema) calling the scalar UDF or not. Error message isjust different.Both functions operate correctly invoked un-nested.The whole expression does work fine if I turn 'get_trxns_for_quarter'into a scalar UDF as well, e.g. by returning just one trxn_gu_id withe.g. MAX() in a scalar datatype. But of course that's no good to me.It also works fine if I select the result of 'get_current_quarter'into a variable and pass that variable into 'get_trxns_for_quarter'.But that's no good to me either since then I cannot use the wholething embedded into other SELECT clauses.Both UDF's are non-deterministic but I couldnt see how that would havean impact anyway.Never mind the syntax on that example or anyhting, I tried all theobvious and not so obvious stuff and it really seems to come down tothe fact that one UDF is scalar and the other one is not. However, Idid not come across any type of information saying that this cannot bedone.Have you any ideas?Any help would be greatly appreciated.Carsten
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of building my first "large scale" database system (after 15+ years of developing Windows Apps and Web Apps) - so I am very VERY "Green" when it comes to Database development & SQL et al.
A little context setting: I am building a multi-tier Statistical Analysis & Reporting system where the "end product" will be Reports created in Reporting Services. There are a ton of business rules that I am implementing in a Business Logic Tier (hidden from the "end user" by a Data Access Tier) comprised of SQL in the form of UDFs (scalar) and Views.
The question: I have been reading that UDFs cause a performance hit compared to things like in-line functions. Alot of the Rules (implemented as Scalar UDFs) build on each other so that the output of UDF #1 is used as input to UDF #2.
So far I am implementing the Business Logic as a hierarchy of Views (7 Views to be exact) with each view implementing multiple Rules; each Rule basically a Scalar UDF. Below is an example of what I am doing:
Example
View #1 -> Select A, B, C, funcX1(A) as ValueX1, funcY1(B, C) as ValueY1 FROM someView
Then
View #2 -> Select A, B, C, ValueX1, ValueY1, funcX2 (ValueX1) as ValueX2, funcY2(ValueY2) as ValueY2 FROM View#1
Currently I have a hierarchy of 7 views that each use UDFs to implement the Business Rules, where the value calculated from a UDF in one View is used as input to UDF in a View further down the Hierarchy.
Is there a better way of implementing all of the Rules instead of using multiple Views with a bunch of UDFs?
The "end product" dataset is then exposed as a Stored Procedure to the reports in Reporting Services.
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
Thanks!
- marty
There is something very strange going on here. Tested with ADO 2.7 andMSDE/2000. At first, things look quite sensible.You have a simple SQL query, let's sayselect * from mytab where col1 = 1234Now, let's write a simple VB program to do this query back to anMSDE/2000 database on our local machine. Effectively, we'llrs.open sSQLrs.closeand do that 1,000 times. We wont bother fetching the result set, itisn't important in this example.No problem. On my machine this takes around 1.6 seconds and modifyingthe code so that the column value in the where clause changes eachtime (i.e col1 = nnnn), doesn't make a substantial difference to thistime. Well, that all seems reasonable, so moving right along...Now we do it with a stored procedurecreate procedure proctest(@id int)asselect * from mytab where col1 = @idand we now find that executingproctest nnnn1,000 times takes around 1.6 seconds whether or not the argumentchanges. So far so good. No obvious saving, but then we wouldn'texpect any. The query is very simple, after all.Well, get to the point!Now create a table-returning UDFcreate function functest(@id int) returns table asreturn(select * from mytab where col1 = @id)try calling that 1,000 times asselect * from functest(nnnn)and we get around 5.5 seconds on my machine if the argument changes,otherwise 1.6 seconds if it remains the same for each call.Hmm, looks like the query plan is discarded if the argument changes.Well, that's fair enough I guess. UDFs might well be more expensive...gotta be careful about using them. It's odd that discarding the queryplan seems to be SO expensive, but hey, waddya expect?. (perhaps theUDF is completely rebuilt, who knows)last test, then. Create an SP that calls the UDFcreate procedure proctest1(@id int)asselect * from functest(@id)Ok, here's the $64,000 question. How long will this take if @idchanges each time. The raw UDF took 5.5 seconds, remember, so thisshould be slightly slower.But... IT IS NOT.. It takes 1.6 seconds whether or not @id changes.Somehow, the UDF becomes FOUR TIMES more efficient when wrapped in anSP.My theory, which I stress is not entirely scientific, goes somethinglike this:-I deduce that SQL Server decides to reuse the query plan in thiscircumstance but does NOT when the UDF is called directly. This iscounter-intuitive but it may be because SQL Server's query parser istuned for conventional SQL i.e it can saywell, I've gotselect * from mytab WHERE [something or other]and now I've gotselect * from mytab WHERE [something else]so I can probably re-use the query plan from last time. (I don't knowif it is this clever, but it does seem to know when twotextually-different queries have some degree of commonality)Whereas withselect * from UDF(arg1)andselect * from UDF(arg2)it goes... hmm, mebbe not.... I better not risk it.But withsp_something arg1andsp_something arg2it goes... yup, i'll just go call it... and because the SP was alreadycompiled, the internal call to the UDF already has a query plan.Anyway, that's the theory. For more complex UDFs, by the way, theperformance increase can be a lot more substantial. On a big complexUDF with a bunch of joins, I measured a tenfold increase inperformance just by wrapping it in an SP, as above.Obviously, wrapping a UDF in an SP isn't generally a good thing; theidea of UDFs is to allow the column list and where clause to filterthe rowset of the UDF, but if you are repeatedly calling the UDF withthe same where clause and column list, this will make it a *lot*faster.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have migrated a database (myDb2014)Â to a SQL Server 2014 instance. We have another on a 2008R2 instance (myDb2008). Both on the same server.
I have setup a linked server to the 2014 instance from the 2008R2 one.
I have a number of sprocs on myDb2008 that call TVFs and sprocs on myDb2014. This worked fine when they were both on the same instance.
Now however, I have an issue where I would have to update all the references in each calling query.
I looked into creating Synonyms but this only works for Tables/Views.
Is there a workaround to querying myDb2014 TVFs/sprocs without having to update each calling query in myDb2008?
How can I list the stored procedures and user-defined functions that reference a given column? I could search ROUTINE_DEFINITION in INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES for '%MyColumnName%' but MyColumnName is not always unique.
Thanks.
We have lots of stored procedures containing temporary tables. In SQL 6.5 every thing was great. But in 7.0, it's doing a lot of recompile while executing. Tried trace flag 8720, didn't work..
Basically I am talking abt this problem :
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q224/5/87.ASP
Let me know if any ideas/Remedies ??? How did any of you tackled this behaviour.
Hi,
What is equivalent to OPTION (RECOMPILE) in SQl Server 2000.
Create table #Employee
(
EmpId int IDENTITY,EmpName varchar(30)
)
insert into #Employee(EmpName )
select EmpName from AllEmployees
OPTION (RECOMPILE)
What exactly does WITH RECOMPILE do? I read that it will create a new plan. I guess the next question is, what is the purpose behind that?
Can someone explain to me?
Thanks
Does someone know whether it is better to drop and reload or sp_recompile a stored procedure to get a new, recompiled execution plan? I have another DBA telling me it is better to drop and reload the stored procedure rather than use sp_recompile. I would think that sp_recompile would be the preferred method.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello:The installation details:W2K SP4, SQL Server 2000 Ent with 1GB RAM. It is a Bi-P3.When I run the Profiler to trace Stored Procedure performance, I get abunch of SP:CacheMiss for couple of stored procedure I invoke quiteoften in a web app.But I do not see SP:Recompile.Here are my questions:i) If the plan is not in the Cache, why am I not see SP: Recompile.Where else can it be tugged.ii) What are the other counters I need to monitor to see if I need morememory.Thanks in advance for any leads on this.Regards:
View 4 Replies View Related
(From an exchange originally posted on SQLServer.com, which wasn't resolved...)
To return views tailored to the user, I have a simple users table that holds user IDs, view names, parameter names, and parameter values that are fetched based on SUSER_SNAME(). The UDF is called MyParam, and takes as string arguments, the name of the view in use, and a parameter name. (The view the user sees is really a call to a corresponding table returning UDF, which accepts some parameters corresponding to the user.)
But the performance is very dependent on the nature of the function call. Here are two samples and the numbers reported by (my first use of) the performance monitor:
Call to table returning UDF, using local variables:
declare @orgauth varchar(50)
set @orgauth = dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'OrgAuth')
declare @since datetime
set @since = DATEADD(DAY,-1 * dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'DaysAgo'),CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
select * from deptAwardsfn(@orgauth,@since)
[187 CPU, 16103 Reads, 187 Duration]
Call to same table returning UDF, using scalar UDFs in parameters:
SELECT *
from deptAwardsFn (
dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'OrgAuth')
,DATEADD(DAY,-1 * dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'DaysAgo'),CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
)
[20625 CPU, 1709010 Reads, 20632 Duration]
(My BOL documentation claims the CPU is in milliseconds and the Duration is in microseconds -- which I question.) Regardless of the unit of measure, it takes a whole bunch longer in the second case.
My only guess is that T-SQL is deciding that the parameter values (returned by dbo.MyParam) are nondeterministic, and continually reevaluates them somehow or other. (What ever happened to call by value?)
Can anyone shed some light on this strange (to me) behavior?
----- (and later, from me)---
(I have since discovered that the reference to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in the function argument is the cause, but I suspect that is an error -- it should only capture the value of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP once, when making the function call IMHO.)
If my data structure never changes, just the data itself, is
there a need to use the "with recompil option" on stored
procedures? Isn't there a performance hit having it in
the stored procedure?
Thanks
What's the performance hit for using 'WITH RECOMPILE' in a stored procedure? I'm not a serious DBA, nor do I pretend to be one, but I'm writing a sp_ to be used with both insert and updates. I'm using a variable that defines the operation (IF @operation = 'Update'...) which will be passed at run-time from ColdFusion. Do I need to use the 'WITH RECOMPILE' clause to keep the sp_ kosher with respect to the operation being performed? And what's the damage in resources?
Thanks,
John E.
How to recompile a stored procedure automatically in SQL server 6.5?
Thanks in advance
Stella
Does the SQL Server 6.5 system recompile all stored procedures automatically when the server is restarted?
Thanks.
Stella
Hi,
currently i am working on performance tuning on some stored procedure and found that most of the stored procedure include with recompile on top of it.
i try to remove it and now it improve a lot on speed tuning. However, for those stored procedure which is using dynamic sql, is it a must to include recompile in our stored procedure?
Hi,I have a question in SQL Server 2K, I use SQL Profile to trace, andfind Stored Procedure was auto recompiled, like this row in thetrace:SP:Recompile151680762004-02-27 16:01:11.610How can I stop the auto recompile.ThanksHarold
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe are developing a production/management solution for the photo finishing sector. We need a performance of 1 order priced per second.
If we run the procedure once we dont have a dramatical performance loss due to recompilation of the stored procs.
If we have about 3 consecutive sessions we find the performance loss to be at a rate of about 200 - 500 %.
We can't afford this. On the site of msdn we found some reasons why sql server needs to recompile, but since the structure of our db can't be changed in such a manner that this would resolve the problem we need an alternative.
All help is greatly appriciated.
Hi ,
what would be correct way to recompile
all user objects ?
Developers working by using alter create and rename on udf and stored procedure, dependecicies window in EM does not repesent correct info.
If I want to see up to date all dependedcies of every user defined object in db
Thank you
Alex
Hey all,
We have a problem with one of our MS SQL 2000 databases and some stored procedures.
I'm not sure exactly what the problem is, but these are the symptons....
The stored procedure runs without problems for a period of time. Abruptly, without warning it begins to time out when called from our web application.
Calling it through the query analyzer it runs within a second.
Forcing the stored procedure to recompile allows the web application to start calling it again without it timing out.
We have a DTS package that runs over night and imports a number of records (not sure on the exact numbers, but definately enough to make a difference to indexes) so this could be part of the problem although when I force a recompile I do not do any update stats or anything else.
I wrote a test script to call the stored procedure when it was timing out to ensure it wasn't a web application problem and the procedure continued to time out until the forced recompile. So I don't think the problem is there.
The stored procedure returns multiple results sets and when it starts timing out it is while it is returning the second results sets.
The code for the second results set is...
Select avg(round(p.PricingValue, 5)) as Average, stdev(round(p.PricingValue, 5)) as StdDev, min(p.CaptureDate) as FromDate, max(p.CaptureDate) as ToDate
From Pricing p
Inner Join Security s
On p.SecurityID = s.SecurityID
Left Outer Join Issuer i
On s.IssuerID = i.IssuerID
WHERE p.PricingTypeID = @PricingType
And p.TenorTypeID = @TenorType
And p.CaptureDate Between @DateFrom And @DateTo
AND p.SecurityID IN ( SELECT SecurityId FROM UserResult ur WHERE ur.UserResultSelected = 1 AND ur.UserID = @userID )
Does anyone have any idea what might be going on here?
Regards
Shaun
Hi,
I increased one of my base tables column which is referenced in view
I noticed sql server didn't recognized this change and its still showing old field size in the view.
I can simply drop and create it again. But wanted to know if there is any way (command/sp) to recompile the view which will be easy to deploy in production as patch.
Thanks
- D