Index(es) On 2 Columns Used By &"between.. And&"
Apr 8, 2008
Hi experts
I have a big table with one clustered index on one of its columns "SerialNumber". Each row of this table holds one card's information. The query on this table is SELECT * FROM TBL1 WHERE SerialNumber = @parmSerialNumber. The query speed is pretty good at the moment thanks to its clustered index.
Now I want to change this table to have 2 extra columns "FromSerialNumber" and "ToSerialNumber" and remove the "SerialNumber" column. In that case, earh row of this table will hold a batch of cards' information. After the change, the query will become SELECT * FROM TBL1 WHERE @parmSerialNumber BETWEEN FromSerialNumber AND ToSerialNumber
Now my quesiton is : How should I apply index(es) on those 2 new columns? a composit index including both columns or creating a non-clustered index on each of them?
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 24, 2007
Hi, all experts here,
Thanks a lot for your kind attention.
As I am creating the non-clustered indexes for the tables, I dont quite understand how dose it really matter to put the columns in the index key columns or put them into the included columns of the index?
I am really confused about that and I am looking forward to hearing from you and thank you very much again for your advices and help.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2005
How do you index through a set of Columns Programmatically using SQL. I have a Table all the columns have the same data for different dates. Column names are Col_0, Col_1, Col_2,.....Col_100, Col_101. I need to perform the same calculation on each column to manipulate the data into a different table. Is it possible to do a While loop that changes the Column name in a SELECT statement. I have tried to do this but can't seem to get it to work. Please help !
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2005
I am trying to index through the columns of MyTable so I can do the same work on all columns. I know how to get the column names from MyTable but when I use @MyColName in the SELECT statement to get MyTable Column 0 Row values I get a table with the column name in each row cell. I can't get the syntax correct to return the value in each cell for that column.
This is a extremely simplified example !!!!!!DECLARE @MyColName nvarchar(30)
--Get the MyTable Column 0 NameSELECT @MyColName = Col_Name(Object_ID('MyTable'), 0)
--Display the MyTable Column 0 Row valuesSELECT @MyColName FROM MyTable --This is the syntax I can not get correct
Can anyone help ?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2013
I find to be able to have multiple NULL entries in the following constraint:
Code:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX my_uidx ON my_table(my_col1,my_col2) WHERE ??? IS NOT NULL;
But is not possible to check multiple columns in "WHERE".
I using SQL Server 2012 Express
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2013
I want to make an index with the following columns, actually together they constitute the PK of the table so the index is created automatically.
The question is witch sort order is the best to have if I want to fetch all rows for one date and one resource? And why?
WHERE Resource = "Car 1" AND Date = "2013-03-03"
Resource, Date, Time
Or
Date, Time, Resource
Below is an example with tree resources, but in reality there can be a lot more and also years of dates.
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 10.00
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 11.00
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 12.00
Car 1, 2013-03-04, 10.00
[Code] ......
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2008
Is there a dynamic management view or system procedure which I can use to find out what columns are in an index, what columns are as an INCLUDE in the index and whether or not the column(s) are ascending or descending. This is excluding the utilities I already know about below:
sys.indexes
sys.index_columns
sp_helpindex
dm_db_index_physical_stats
dm_db_index_operational_stats
I only ask because it is a pain to look through the sys.indexes and sys.index_columns tables every time I want to know about what columns are in the index created. I also know that scripting the index would give me the information I need but there must be a better way.
Many Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
I'm using sys.dm_db_missing_index_details to find missing indexes on a database that is currently in testing. After running a bunch of our reports, there are several suggested indexes on 3 or 4 columns that have 15 - 20 included columns. The included columns are mostly varchars ranging from 1 to 150 characters along with a couple of date columns. My index size on that table is already nearly twice the size of the data.
I don't think it's a good idea to add an index with that many columns, but the information I've read on included columns is very general. I'm wondering if there is something about them that I don't understand that would make this a good idea.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2006
my table :
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[users] (
[ID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[A1] [nvarchar] (100) NULL ,
[A2] [nvarchar] (100) NULL ,
[A3] [nvarchar] (100) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
i must keep ID columns as primary key
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[users] WITH NOCHECK ADD
CONSTRAINT [PK_users] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID]
) ON [PRIMARY]
but now A1+A2 must be unique
how can i do it ?
thank you
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2014
When creating a column store index, are there any reasons not to include all columns, besides index size of course? i.e. will the index be more versatile with more columns or should I treat it exactly like its a standard index, putting only necessary columns, in the correct order?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2005
Table DDL below:The tables I have contain Timesheet information. Each row in thetblTSCollected table contains an entry for an employee into thetimesheet system, specifically by scanning the barcode on their badge.A whole bunch of business logic periodically attempts to "pair" theseinto logically matched scans. For example, some employees will scan inand out of a single place of work. For these there will be a rowwritten to the tblTSRuleApplied table which contains, inter alia andsome redundant data, the fldCollectedID for the two rows. The earlierwill be put into the fldStartTimeCollectedID, and the later into thefldEndTimeCollectedID. Some employees will clock on at their base,then perform sub-duties at different locations during the day, andclock off at their home base at the end of their shift. For these, thesystem would identify the outer records as a matching pair, and thenpair up inner records by location.However, if the employee fails to enter a valid "clocking in and out"pair (for example, if they clock in at the wrong location) the systemneeds to generate a "dummy" "clocking in and out" record for thepayroll department. Ideally, this would have NULL values in thefldStartTimeCollectedID and fldEndTimeCollectedID columns. This wouldalert a user in a different part of the system, where missingtimesheets were being arbitrated, that an employee appeared to havefailed to clock in for that day. Of course, the user could seeon-screen that they had clocked in, but at an incorrect location.Unfortunately, the database designer is not here for the moment (he wasknocked off his bicycle recently), but he put a unique index on thetblTSRuleApplied table that prevents the same value being entered intothe fldStartTimeCollectedID and fldEndTimeCollectedID columns. This isgenerally A Good Thing, since we don't want the same timesheet scan toform both a "clocking on" event and a "clocking off" event.So, is there any way of retaining the requirement that thefldStartTimeCollectedID and the fldEndTimeCollectedID columns may notcontain the same value in a single row, UNLESS that value is NULL inwhich case all is hunky dory. I should add that the clients don't muchcare for Triggers (and neither do I for that matter).Many thanks if you are able to help.Edwardif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollected]') andOBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsForeignKey') = 1)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] DROP CONSTRAINTFK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollectedGOif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollected1]') andOBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsForeignKey') = 1)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] DROP CONSTRAINTFK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollected1GOif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[FK_tblTSArbAccept_tblTSRuleApplied]') andOBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsForeignKey') = 1)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSArbAccept] DROP CONSTRAINTFK_tblTSArbAccept_tblTSRuleAppliedGOif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[FK_tblTSCollected_tblTSRuleApplied]') andOBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsForeignKey') = 1)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSCollected] DROP CONSTRAINTFK_tblTSCollected_tblTSRuleAppliedGOif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[tblTSCollected]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id,N'IsUserTable') = 1)drop table [dbo].[tblTSCollected]GOif exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id =object_id(N'[dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id,N'IsUserTable') = 1)drop table [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied]GOCREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblTSCollected] ([fldCollectedID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[fldEmployeeID] [int] NULL ,[fldLocationCode] [varchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASNULL ,[fldTimeStamp] [datetime] NULL ,[fldRuleAppliedID] [int] NULL ,[fldBarCode] [varchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL,[fldProcessed] [smallint] NOT NULL) ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] ([fldEmpRuleID] [int] NOT NULL ,[fldRuleAppliedID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[fldStartTime] [datetime] NULL ,[fldEndTime] [datetime] NULL ,[fldStartTimeCollectedID] [int] NULL ,[fldEndTimeCollectedID] [int] NULL ,[fldStartArbStatus] [smallint] NULL ,[fldEndArbStatus] [smallint] NULL ,[fldDurationArbStatus] [smallint] NULL ,[fldPrimary] [smallint] NOT NULL ,[fldDateEntered] [datetime] NULL ,[fldEnteredBy] [int] NULL) ON [PRIMARY]GOALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSCollected] WITH NOCHECK ADDCONSTRAINT [DF_tblTSCollected_fldProcessed] DEFAULT (0) FOR[fldProcessed],CONSTRAINT [PK_tblTimesheetCollected] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([fldCollectedID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]GOALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] WITH NOCHECK ADDCONSTRAINT [DF_tblTSRuleApplied_fldPrimary] DEFAULT (1) FOR[fldPrimary],CONSTRAINT [PK_tblTSRuleApplied] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([fldRuleAppliedID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY] ,CONSTRAINT [IX_tblTSRuleApplied_1] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED([fldStartTimeCollectedID],[fldEndTimeCollectedID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]GOALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSCollected] ADDCONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSCollected_tblEmployee1] FOREIGN KEY([fldEmployeeID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblEmployee] ([fldEmployeeID]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSCollected_tblLocation] FOREIGN KEY([fldLocationCode]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblLocation] ([fldLocationCode]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSCollected_tblTSRuleApplied] FOREIGN KEY([fldRuleAppliedID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] ([fldRuleAppliedID])GOALTER TABLE [dbo].[tblTSRuleApplied] ADDCONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollected] FOREIGN KEY([fldStartTimeCollectedID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSCollected] ([fldCollectedID]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSCollected1] FOREIGN KEY([fldEndTimeCollectedID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSCollected] ([fldCollectedID]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSDurationStatus] FOREIGN KEY([fldDurationArbStatus]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSDurationStatus] ([fldStatus]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSEmpRules] FOREIGN KEY([fldEmpRuleID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSEmpRules] ([fldEmpRuleID]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSTimeStatus] FOREIGN KEY([fldStartArbStatus]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSTimeStatus] ([fldStatus]),CONSTRAINT [FK_tblTSRuleApplied_tblTSTimeStatus1] FOREIGN KEY([fldEndArbStatus]) REFERENCES [dbo].[tblTSTimeStatus] ([fldStatus])GO
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi,I would like to add a unique index that consists of two fields in atable.e.g. tbl_A (field1,field2) -- field1 & field2 Indexed and combinationmust be Unique.Can anyone tell me the actual sql syntax to create this index?Thanks,June.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2007
I have 2 columns in a table namely ColA and ColB.all DML operations are through views n every view has
Where clause i.e where ColA=€?€? with check option .
All most all my DML queries are using where clause on ColB
Where ColB=€?€?
Now my question is I have a clusted index on both ColA and ColB.in which order I have to create cluster index .
i.e ColA ASC,ColB ASC or ColB ASC,ColA ASC.
Is there any performance gain we can achieve with their order
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2007
I am upgrading from Access, where you can only have 10 fields in a primary key or unique index. Is this also the limit in SQL Server? If not, what is the limit?
Thanks for any help on this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2008
Hello, I will explain myself further. I want to make my table in such a way that no two colums have the same value for example:
Row 1 - Column 1 = "cool"
Row 1 - Column 3 = 91
Row 3 - Column 1 = "cool"
Row 3 - Column 3 = 91
I dont care about one column having duplicate values, I want to protect against Column 1 and 3 having the same values on other rows. Is this possible to do in sql server?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2001
I'm looking for a query that will return all index names, the table the index is on and the columns in the index...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2005
Hello all,
how can I select one or more columns from a table by column-index and NOT by columnname?
e.g.:
SELECT tbl1.[1], tbl1.[2], tbl1.[3] FROM Orders AS tbl1
and NOT like this:
SELECT tbl1.OrderNo, tbl1.ProductNo, tbl1.Price FROM Orders AS tbl1
Is that possible in MS-SQL 2000?
Thanks a lot in advance
kind regards
Otto
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2014
I am trying to tune a process that is running slowly. I analyzed the process using the Database Engine Tuning Advisor, and it recommended the creation of 3 indexes, all non-clustered:
1) ColA, include ColB
2) ColA, include ColC
3) ColA, include ColD
So... I created a single non-clustered index on:
4) ColA, include ColB, ColC, ColD
That should do the same thing, right? A look at my execution plan shows that the index I created is being scanned -- 3 times. What is puzzling me, though, is that the Database Engine Tuning Advisor is still recommending I create these 3 separate indexes, even with the index (4) that I created in existence.
If it matters, ColA, ColB, ColC and ColD are all int FKs.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2008
Hi,
SQL Server 2005 has a new very useful feature for creating non-clustered indexes called INCLUDE <columns> which are very helpful when trying to create covering indexes.
Does anyone know of a way to retrieve these INCLUDE columns through any of the system metadata tables? The sp_helpIndex stored procedure is what I currently use but that only returns the (sorted) index columns and not the include columns.
Thanks in advance,
Gordon Radley
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2014
I have a table with clustered index on that. I have only 5 columns in that table. Execution plan is showing that Index scan occurred. What are the cause of the Index scan how can we change that to index seek?
I am giving that kind of similar query below
SELECT @ProductID= ProductID FROM Product WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE SalesID= '@salesId' and Product = 'Clothes '
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2015
Does including non-key columns work for the performance of an index?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2015
I used following query to identify missing indexes:
SELECT mid.statement , mid.included_columns, mid.equality_columns, mid.inequality_columns,
migs.avg_total_user_cost * (migs.avg_user_impact / 100.0) * (migs.user_seeks + migs.user_scans) AS improvement_measure,
'CREATE INDEX [NCIX_' + CONVERT (varchar, mig.index_group_handle) + '_' + CONVERT (varchar, mid.index_handle)
+ '_' + LEFT (PARSENAME(mid.statement, 1), 32) + ']'
+ ' ON ' + mid.statement
[Code] ....
I think I need to only create few if an index is covering all columns then I do not need to create more indexes for separate columns or should I create separate index as suggested?
Similarly:
CREATE INDEX [NCIX_20187_20186_TL_SRV_Stationary_Stock_Transact] ON [TL_SRV_Stationary_Stock_Transaction] ([SerialNo],[StationaryStatus]) GO
CREATE INDEX [NCIX_20189_20188_TL_SRV_Stationary_Stock_Transact] ON [TL_SRV_Stationary_Stock_Transaction] ([StationaryStatus]) INCLUDE ([SerialNo]) GO
[Code] ....
Should I create all indexes above or use minimum number of indexes which covers all columns as mentioned in above create index statements?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2007
Hi
If I delete 5 or more columns from a table I get the error "Index was outside the bounds of the array", OK is the only response. I then have to close the report and then open it again.
Easy fix is don't delete more than 5 columns, but my template is setup with 15 columns as it's far quicker to delete them as it is to add them 1 by 1 each time. I've finally got around to looking for a hotfix or something similar but can find no mention of this exact error relating to table column deleting.
Anyone else experience this or know if there is a hotfix for it?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2011
I would like to know the impacts (if any) of adding nonclustered index with included columns on large tables (these tables are populated by bulk insert from text files).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2014
Usually it is better to include the columns in the index that are in where clause, select list and join.I am thinking that the columns in the selected list is better to keep as index columns and the columns that are in the where clause is better to keep in key columns.Where do we use join column is it better to create as main key column or included column.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2015
We are on SQL 2014...we have a bunch of views in a database where we are trying to find the views which have more than 16 columns max for unique index/constraint...this is needed so we can convert them to indexed views...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2007
I hope i'm in the right place, but thanks anyway....
Actually i have 2 questions (regarding sql-server Indices/Keys):
1) I have an index, which is consisted of 4 columns.
I've read elsewhere that this index functions (as well) as an index (single column
index) on the first column of this multi-column index.
Does this mean that if i'd like to have (in addition) Indices on all of the 4 columns
seperately i need to define only 3???
2) I have a unique key consisted of multiple columns.
I'd like to save an index to this combination of columns as well (to speed up
things in DB...).
Does the definition of a multiple-columns key free me from defining the multiple-
columns index???
can anyone explain the main diference between Keys and Indices???
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2007
I hope i'm in the right place, but thanks anyway....
Actually i have 2 questions (regarding sql-server Indices/Keys):
1) I have an index, which is consisted of 4 columns.
I've read elsewhere that this index functions (as well) as an index (single column
index) on the first column of this multi-column index.
Does this mean that if i'd like to have (in addition) Indices on all of the 4 columns
seperately i need to define only 3???
2) I have a unique key consisted of multiple columns.
I'd like to save an index to this combination of columns as well (to speed up
things in DB...).
Does the definition of a multiple-columns key free me from defining the multiple-
columns index???
can anyone explain the main diference between Keys and Indices???
thanks,
Ran Kizi
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2015
In SQL 2012.A query that joins 2 table, with order by clause doesn't get sorted and the result set is not ordered. This happens when some of the columns in the where criteria are in a unique index which is the index that is used for the join between the 2 tables, and all the columns in the unique index are in the where criteria.In the query plan there is no component for sort.The work around was to drop the unique index, or change it to a non-unique index. Once this was done, the execution plan was changed to add the sort component (even when the index was changed to non-unique and the join was still using this index).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2015
I am really puzzled by an apparent difference between table index key column order and its statistics order. I was under understanding that index statistics mirror index definition. However, in my db 2470 index ordinal definitions match statistics definition but 66 do not. I also can reproduce such discrepancy in 2008 R2, 2012 and 2014.
As per definition,
stats_column_id
int
1-based ordinal within set of stats columns
This script duplicates this for me.
BEGIN TRAN
GO
use tempdb
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ItemProperties](
[itmID] [int] NOT NULL,
[cpID] [smallint] NOT NULL,
[ipuID] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
The result I get is this:
object_id      stats_name                                    Â
stats_column_list
1525580473 PK_ItemProperties_itmID_ipuID_cpID itmID, cpID, ipuID,
and
object_id      index_name                                    Â
index_column_list
1525580473 PK_ItemProperties_itmID_ipuID_cpID itmID, ipuID, cpID,
Also a query I used to discover this in my db is:
WITH stat AS
(
SELECT
s.object_id
,s.name as stats_name
,(
SELECT
c.name + ', ' as [data()]
FROM sys.stats_columns as sc
[Code] .....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2006
please explain the differences btween this logical & phisicall operations that we can see therir graphical icons in execution plan tab in Management Studio
thank you in advance
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
Hello:
I am running into an issue with RS2k PDF export.
Case: Exporting Report to PDF/Printing/TIFF
Report: Contains 1 table with 19 Columns. 1 column is static, the other 18 are visible at the users descretion. Report when printed/exported to pdf spans 2 pages naturally, 16 on the first page, 3 on the second, and the column widths have been adjusted to provide a perfect page span .
User A elects to hide two of the columns, and show the rest. The report complies and the viewable version is perfect, the excel export is perfect.. the PDF export on the first page causes every fith column, starting with the last column that was hidden to be expanded to take up additional width. On the spanned page, it renders the first column on that page correctly, then there is a white space gap equal to the width of the hidden columns and then the rest of the cells show with the last column expanded to take up the same width that the original 2 columns were going to take up, plus its width.
We have tried several different settings to see if it helps this issue or makes it worse. So far cangrow/canshrink/keep together have made no impact. It is not possible to increase the page size due to limited page size selection availablility for the client. There are far too many combinations of what the user can elect to show or hide to put together different tables to show and hide on the same report to remove this effect.
Any help or suggestion on this issue would be appreciated
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2007
I have a table<table1> with 804668 records primary on table1(col1,col2,col3,col4)
Have created non-clustered index on <table1>(col2,col3,col4),to solve a performance issue.(which is a join involving another table with 1.2 million records).Seems to be working great.
I want to know whether this will slow down,insert and update on the <table1>?
View 2 Replies
View Related
