I have some data that looks like this
Col1 Col2 SumCol
XXX,YYY, 5
XXX,ZZZ,6
ZZZ,XXX,7
YYY,XXX,2
I want to do a inner join on that data so I get this
XXX,YYY, 7
XXX,ZZZ,13
Right now I'm using a CTE set to do that, is there a better way??
Hello
Im searching for a solution to set all matrix row or cell the same height.
it schoud looks like this example:
This is a simple matrix
test a
text b
text c
text d
text e
text f
text g
This is a matrix with all the same row-height.
test a
text b
.
text c
.
.
text d
text e
text f
text g
.
.
Thx you a lot
We are using a presence checker to register when our employees show up at work, when they leave and whenever they change their working section.
The raw data has this format:
TABLE
-----
TIMESTAMP USERID SECTION INCIDENCE
------------------------------------------------------
2014-06-27 14:52:40.000 77675669 7 0
2014-06-27 15:08:33.000 77675669 6 8
2014-06-27 15:30:58.000 77675669 7 12
2014-06-27 18:52:00.000 77675669 11 15
2014-06-27 19:47:38.000 77675669 7 12
2014-06-27 23:30:18.000 77675669 7 0
In order to determine the exact time people had been working in the sections I have to match every record with the record of the successive timestamp I do:
SELECT TIMESTAMP as START, USERID, SECTION, INCIDENCE, MIN(TIME_END) as STOP
FROM (
SELECT *, TABLE2.TIMESTAMP as TIME_END
FROM TABLE
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE as TABLE2 on TABLE.USERID = TABLE2.USERID and
TABLE2.TIMESTAMP > Table.TIMESTAMP and
[Code] ....
How do I get the incidence of the successive timestamp in my query?
The key trick is that I first do a self join which increases the amount of records, including senseless matches from the first timestamp with the last one of that day. Afterwards I group by all columns of TABLE in order to get only the successive timestamp.
But once I include TABLE2.INCIDENCE in the GROUP BY clause, of course the query stops working correctly.
I can't use the TIMESTAMP isself as it is not singular (there are several terminals in the plant); and I prefer not to use Timestamp in combination with Userid, as the userid is actually not stored directly and has to be retrieved through a couple of joined tables. Any smarter way to include a second column once the successive timestamp has been determined.
Hi ,
I've got two tables.. the first table carried a ProductID, and amongst other things a TradePrice
The other tbl carries a ProductID, a IndivPrice and a CustomerID
The second tbl lists prices for products for indiv Customers.
My Query needs to bring back ALL the products from the first tbl...
It also needs to show the TradePrice for that product.
I need to join my query to the second tbl...
And finally, if the second tbl has a price for that product AND the customerID is the same as one I pass into the query.. show that price also..
So here's my first query:
SELECT dbo.Products.ProductID, ProductName, ProductTradePrice, IndivPrice, dbo.Trade_PriceLists.CustomerID AS PLCustomerID FROM dbo.Products LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Trade_PriceLists ON dbo.Products.ProductID = dbo.Trade_PriceLists.ProductID WHERE (ProductType = 'Trade' OR ProductType = 'Both') AND (Replace(Lower(ProductBrand),' ','') = 'brandname') AND (CustomerID IS NULL OR CustomerID = 'teste' OR CustomerID = '') ORDER BY TradeOrder
I thought that would work, but what happens is that, if that particular customer has no indiv prices set.. then it only shows the ones that have no records at all in that second tbl..
So unless there is a record for a particular product in that second tbl and it doesn't have a CustomerID assigned to (which would never happen as that tbl is only every for indiv customer prices) then it doesn't show.
Examples:
First Tbl
ProductID Name TradePrice
1 Jumper £1.00
2 Jeans £3.00
3 Shoes £5.00
4 Hat £2.00
Second Tbl
ProductID CustomerID IndivPrice
1 teste £0.50
2 othercustomer £2.50
3 teste £4.50
What I want in the results is:
ProductID ProductName TradePrice IndivPrice CustomerID (PLCustomerID)
1 Jumper £1.00 £0.50 teste
2 Jeans £3.00
3 Shoes £5.00 £4.50 teste
4 Hat £2.00
See? - The 2nd product should not get an indiv price as although it's in that second tbl, the customerID assigned to it is different. The 4th product should not get an indiv price as it's not in that second tbl at all.
however, with my query above I'd only get Products 1and 3... and if I did a query on a customer with no indiv prices I'd only get product 4 as it's not in the indiv at all...
HELP!!!!!
I have 2 tables:
create table #InsuredLoc (
PolGK int,
InsuredLocGK varchar(20),
InsuredLocEffDt datetime,
InsuredLocType varchar(20),
InsuredLocStatus varchar(20),
InsuredLocAddress varchar(50),
PolEdrGk varchar(20),
[Code] ...
I will need to join the #InsuredLoc table to the #PolicyEndorsement table using PolGk and PolEdrGk and get the min(BkgDt) and min(PolEdrRowUpdateDt) for the distinct list of InsuredLocType, InsuredLocStatus, and InsuredLocAddress fields from the #InsuredLoc table above.
 I will also need the min(InsuredLocEffDt) and the max(InsuredLocUpdateDt) from the #InsuredLoc table for those records. So after the first run, i should get the following:
I tried to use CTE's with ranking, but some records are dropping off and I'm not sure why. Â
I am having problem with Inner joining of tables
my query is..
Select j.jobSubject,e.eOrganization ,jv.JobClick,j.jobID from dbo.tbl_Jobs jinner join dbo.tbl_Employer e on e.mId=j.jobCreatedByIDinner join dbo.tbl_JobView jv on jv.JobID=j.jobID
order by jv.JobClick desc This query returns 1 to many records
But I need the query should return 0 to many record . .yes I have already know inner join does not handle my problem so plz suggest me which type of join would solve my problem
If there is 13 million records in one table and 40 thousand records in another table then what is the fastest way of joining these two tables????
This was a question to me from somebody to which i cudn't answer back properly. Cud anybody tell the answer with properreasons behind the answer??????
Thanx.
I have my SQL call:
SELECT CallLog.CallID, Journal.HEATSeqFROM CallLog INNER JOIN Journal ON CallLog.CallID = Journal.CallID
There are multiple enteries in the Journal table for every entry in the CallLog table, so I receive multiple records:
CallID HEATSeq00000164 983290904 00000164 983291548 00000164 983295209 00000231 984818271 00000231 985194317 00000231 985280248
I only want to return the LAST record in the Journal table, so the output will be:
CallID HEATSeq00000164 983295209 00000231 985280248
Can this be done directly in the SQL call?
Hi All,
I need a bit of help with a join. I have 2 tables :
TradeSummary
has fields : SymbolID, CurrentPrice, TotalValue
Trades
has fields : SymbolID, TradeID, ExecutionTime, TradeValue
TradeSummary has one entry for each SymbolID, while Trades contains one or more entries per SymbolID
and what I want to retreive is :
For every item in TradeSummary get CurrentPrice, TotalValue from TradeSummary
and also get TradeValue from Trades for the record for max(ExecutionTime)
tables are joined on TradeSummary.SymbolID = Trades.SymbolID
Every attempt of mine so far returns multiple rows for each SymbolID - I want only one row per SymbolID
thanks in advance
[URL]
I had a problem before of not been able to find the rows with 0 values. I've now managed this although it's brought up duplicate rows due to the discounts been different on the same Mfr_part_number. I tried using the max function on the isnull (Exhibit_Discount.Discount, 0.00) AS Discount instead but to no success. i think i maybe something to do with PK keys not been used in the set-up of the database.
Use Sales_Builder
Go
SELECT DISTINCT
GBPriceList.[Mfr_Part_Num],
[Code]....
Is there a way to create one field from multiple records using sql.For exampleTable 1John 18Peter 18David 18Now I want an sql query that when executed will return a field thatlooks like thisQuery1John Peter DavidSo basically it will return one record with all the name in one field
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have the folowing 3 (SS2005) tables:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblSubscription](
[SubscriptionID] [int] IDENTITY(1000000,1) NOT NULL,
[SubscriberID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Status] [int] NOT NULL,
[JournalID] [int] NOT NULL,
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblTransaction](
[TransactionID] [bigint] IDENTITY(100000000,1) NOT NULL,
[TransactionTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[SubscriptionID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblMailing](
[MialingID] [bigint] IDENTITY(1000000000,1) NOT NULL,
[SubscriptionID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MailTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MailDate] [datetime] NOT NULL
So for each subscription there can be 1 or more transactions and 0 or
more mailings, and the mailings are not necassarily related to the
transactions. What I am having difficulty doing is this:
I wish to select tblMailing.MailingID, tblMailing.MailDate,
tblMailing.SubscriptionID (or tblSubscription.SubscriptionID),
tblSubscription.SubscriberID, tblSubscription.Status,
tblTransaction.TransactionID, tblTransaction.Created, but I only wish
to retrieve rows from the transaction table where
tblTransaction.Created is the latest dated transaction for that
subscription.
I.E. (maybe this makes more sense..:) I wish to select all rows from
tblMailing along with each mailing's relevent subscription details,
including details of the LATEST TRANSACTION for each of those
subscriptions.
I am currently working along the lines of MAX(tblTransaction.Created)
and possibly GROUP BY in a subquery, but cannot quite figure out the
logic.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks, KoG
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me which of the following is the most efficient query if i have huge tables.
SELECT *FROM Tab1 Inner join Tab2 ON Tab1.Col1 = Tabl2.Col1 AND Tab1.Col1 = 5
OR
SELECT *FROM Tab1 Inner join Tab2 ON Tab1.Col1 = Tabl2.Col1WHERE Tab1.Col1 = 5
As long as i explored this, Sql Server Query Execution Plan shows the similar cost for both cases. Is there any difference?
If yes why?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sulaman Riaz
SELECThorse1.horse_name AS Child_Horse,
horse2.horse_name AS Sire_Horse,
event.event_name
FROMhorse AS horse1 INNER JOIN horse AS horse2 ON horse1.sire = horse2.horse_id,
entry,
event
WHEREhorse1.horse_id = entry.horse_id
ANDentry.event_id = event.event_id
[Code] ....
I need to list the names of the horses that has entered in the same event as its sire and above is the result that I've got.I'm meant to get only the first two lines of the result since Boxer is father of Flash and Star and they all entered the same event called Dressage. (below is the evidence and refer to the first three rows)
SELECTentry.event_id,
entry.horse_id,
horse.horse_name
FROMentry,
horse
WHEREhorse.horse_id = entry.horse_id
[Code] ....
with my code in the first box, what should I add in order to get the result that I want?
Hi, all experts here,
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
I got a problem with the records returned by inner join query. It is weird as in table a I with records r1, and in table b with records r2 (r1>r2), but the returned record number r3 is greater than r1? That is so strange. As the reasonable records returned should be less than r1?(inner join on attribute a). What probably is the cause of the problem? I am looking forward to hearing from you and thank you very much.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
I have a sql statement that joins two tables and I get back a few thousand records when I run it in query tool in management studio.
But when I use SSIS merge join to join the two tables my output is 0 records.
I did sort the key column in both tables by setting 'sortkeyposition' property to 1 in advanced editor for output of both tables.
however the merge join returns nothing to my destination tables. Also I am doing a inner join. The task runs without error but returns nothing as well.. any ideas?
I have 100k + records in table usr_table and I want to select all of them that do not have the same ID as the ID's indicated in table Usr_Type_Data
Select * From usr_table As t1 Join Company_Sales.dbo.Usr_Type_Data As t2 ON t2.user_id = t1.user_id Where CustomerTypeId <> 7
I get 0 returned.
If I change it to:
Select * From usr_table As t1 Join Company_Sales.dbo.Usr_Type_Data As t2 ON t2.user_id = t1.user_id Where CustomerTypeId = 7
I get all records from table Usr_Data_Type returned.
Do I need to specify a special Join type?
Or perhaps change the T-SQL around?
How to return only non matching left join records. Currently I am doing a traffic management database to learn sql.
I am checking for all parishes with no associated drivers. Currently I only have 2 of such.
The regular left join
select parish.name, driver.fname from parish left join driver on driver.parish=parish.name
Returns the all the names of the parishes and the first name of the associated drive, followed by the matches, however the two parishes with no matches have null for the first name.
Hi
I have 2 tables with more then million records in each and I have to perform full outer join.
The problem is that the join clause contains 2 different parameters (int and string) like this:
Select *
From a full outer join b
On a.cli = b.cli OR a.reference = b.reference
Because of the OR in the clause and the million records the query is infinite. If I change to one rule only then it works fine.
How can I join these 2 big tables with 2 rules?
Thanks
Itay
Hi,
I have a merge (SQL 2005 Standard -> Express) topolgoy which is having problems
The main problem is that the join filters don't seem to work for one area and I am hoping someone can help me with some troubleshooting advice
There are 140+ tables in the topology but the ones causing particular pain are a parent child relationship where the child is actually a bridge/linking table to another table.
Therefore although it is a parent child in the replication filters it is the reverse. i.e. the child has the paramterised filter on it and the parent is one level down joined by it's id. There are other tables joined to this parent table but it stays at three levels deep. The @join_unique_key therefore is set to 0 as is the partition options for the parent /child relationship.
However, when we synchronise we have a problem. The rows get inserted in to the database in RI order but only the child records are replicated down to the subscriber.
The child table with the parameterised filter has 13 articles joined to it in total and one of the other branches of join filters go down as deep as four levels. Most though do not.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to why this might be happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, James
P.S. I should add this problem only occurs when the edits are made at the publisher. If new records are added at the subscriber everything is fine.
Hi folks. Thanks for the opportunity to get a bit of help here.
I've got two tables. Say, table "foo" and table "bar".
I LEFT JOIN them on a key, say, foo.id and bar.fooid.
For some reason, when I do this join, I get only records from "foo" which have a mate in "bar".
What I really need is all records from "foo", but the columns from bar when there is a match. I don't want to exclude records from "foo" just because they don't have a match from "bar".
Am I just misusing LEFT JOIN?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
I have 2 tables GLSUMMARY and GLBUDGET, they are identical.
I am joining them together with a left outer join from the SUMMARY to the BUDGET but when I dont have a matching BUDGET record on the join the SUMMARY gets dropped as well :eek:
Any help will be appreciated!
Here is the query!
SELECT s.conu as CoNu, s.deptnu as DeptNu,
s.fundnu as FundNu, s.acctnu as AcctNu,
Sum(isNull(Amt01,0)) as Amt01,
Sum(isNull(Amt02,0)) as Amt02,
Sum(isNull(Amt03,0)) as Amt03,
Sum(isNull(Amt04,0)) as Amt04,
Sum(isNull(Amt05,0)) as Amt05,
Sum(isNull(Amt06,0)) as Amt06,
Sum(isNull(Amt07,0)) as Amt07,
Sum(isNull(Amt08,0)) as Amt08,
Sum(isNull(Amt09,0)) as Amt09,
Sum(isNull(Amt10,0)) as Amt10,
Sum(isNull(Amt11,0)) as Amt11,
Sum(isNull(Amt12,0)) as Amt12,
Sum(isNull(Amt13,0)) as Amt13,
Sum(isNull(Bud01,0)) as Bud01,
Sum(isNull(Bud02,0)) as Bud02,
Sum(isNull(Bud03,0)) as Bud03,
Sum(isNull(Bud04,0)) as Bud04,
Sum(isNull(Bud05,0)) as Bud05,
Sum(isNull(Bud06,0)) as Bud06,
Sum(isNull(Bud07,0)) as Bud07,
Sum(isNull(Bud08,0)) as Bud08,
Sum(isNull(Bud09,0)) as Bud09,
Sum(isNull(Bud10,0)) as Bud10,
Sum(isNull(Bud11,0)) as Bud11,
Sum(isNull(Bud12,0)) as Bud12,
Sum(isNull(Bud13,0)) as Bud13
FROM shelbydb.shelby.GLSummary S
left OUTER JOIN shelbydb.shelby.GLBudget B
on
(s.begindate = b.begindate)
and (s.acctnu = b.acctnu)
and (s.conu = b.conu)
and (s.deptnu = b.deptnu)
and (s.fundNu = b.fundNu)
WHERE
(s.begindate = '1/1/2004'
and b.begindate = '1/1/2004')
group by
S.conu, S.deptnu, S.fundnu, S.acctnu,
b.conu, b.deptnu, b.fundnu, b.acctnu
i have Two tables... with both the table having LastUpdated Column. And, in my Select Query i m using both the table with inner join.And i want to show the LastUpdated column which has the maxiumum date value. i.e. ( latest Updated Column value).
View 5 Replies View RelatedHello All,
We all were new at one point.... any help is appreciated.
Objective:
Combining two 49,000 row tables and remove records where there is only 1 column difference. (keeping the specified column value removing the one with a blank.)
Reason:
I have 2 people going through a list, coding a specific column with a single letter value. They both have different progress on each sheet. Hence I am trying to UNION them and have a result of their combined efforts without duplicates.
My progress/where I'm stuck:
Here is my first query/union:
SELECT * FROM [Eds table]
UNION SELECT * FROM [Vickis table];
As shown above, I have unioned these 2 tables and my results removed th obvious whole record duplicates, but since 1 column is different on these, a union without criteria considers them unique.....
an example of duplicates that I must remove are as follows:
142301 - Product 5000 - 150# - S (Keep)
142031 - Product 5000 - 150# - "" <--- Blank (Remove)
I am trying to run another query on my first query results so I don't mess my first query up. Here it is:
SELECT DISTINCT [Prod #], [Prod Name], [Prod Description], [Product Type]
FROM [Combined Tables]
WHERE [Product Type]<>" ";
Please Help! Thank you in advance.
--------------------
5 minutes away from pulling my last one!
BaldNAskewed
Is there anyway I can return only the last row of a query, like TOP does for the top most items?I would like to return something like this:SELECT BOTTOM 1 Column_CFROM Table1WHERE Column_A = somethingAny help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
View 3 Replies View Related1. Is there a stored procedure, or a way to reverse engineer a database in SQL Server 6.0?
2. I need to create a recovery system for all datbases. I know SP_HELP_REVDATABASE dbname
works for sql server 6.5 but does not for sql server 6.0
Thanks
Rajiv
Does anyone know of a way to determine the code of a stored procedure that was built with encryption? I inherited a db with many of these and we are not sure which version of the source code exists on the server. Alternatively, can I compile a new SP and compare it to the old one in any way other than testing lots of data?
thanks in advance.
If I want to query the db and pull the records in reverse how can I do that?
Here, It looks something like this.
sql = " SELECT "
sql = sql & "ID, from_, subject, comments, "
sql = sql & "msgtime, msgdate, repto, followups "
sql = sql & "FROM " & TABLE_NAME & ""
sql = sql & " WHERE (repto < 1);"
sql = sql & " Order by ID" <-I want to get this starting with the largest ID #
Any Idea's?
Thanks in advance.
Mike
Is is possible to write a query that does the reverse of a cross tab query, I have a table that is mirrored for our Main frame, the table contains a item number a warehouse number and a date field and then 43 fields like field01 thru field43 which store quantities, each field out from 01 is another date our from the date field and I need to look for the item, warehouse and return a date where one of the many field is greater than or equal to the quantity I am looking for, I obviously will have to calculate the date field but thought If I could do the reverse of a cross tab giving a resuld set of 43 records for everyone in the first file I could do a quick update for item number, warehouse match and quantity field greater than what i need returning the date
blah blah blah , sorry I made it sound so confusing
THANKS IN ADVANCE
Hi . My database seems to be somehow encrypted by the software I used. When I try to export my data some fields are encrypted like this:
1 => 31911
2 => 63758
3 => 95540
4 => 127258
5 => 158912
6 => 190504
7 => 222032
8 => 253498
I'm really sure it's not some complicated formula (because I managed to recover other fields) . I just want to reverse the formula used to "encrypt" this data.
Thank you. Excuse my english.
HI, I'm using Visual Web Developer and SQL Server 2005 Express Editions. I have a database with two tables, say AccountsTable and PersonsTable, with a one to many relationship respectively.
Given a particular selected record in PersonsTable, I need to look up the corresponding master record in AccountsTable. Here's what I've done:
SqlDataSource1 has a "SELECT * FROM PersonsTable" and a GridView1 which uses this as its datasource and the 'enable Selection' checkbox is On. This works fine.
Then, I create a second SqlDataSource2. When I click on the WHERE button in the Configure Data Source page, I have chosen the following parameters:
Column:PrimaryKeyField; Operator:=; Source=Control; ControlID=GridView1; Default Value='I left this blank' but the Value field shows GridView1.SelectedValue when I click the ADD button.
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource2" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:bizConnectionString %>"
SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [AccountsTable] WHERE ([AccountNumber] = @AccountNumber)">
<SelectParameters>
<asp:ControlParameter ControlID="GridView1" Name="AccountNumber" PropertyName="SelectedValue"
Type="Int32" />
</SelectParameters>
</asp:SqlDataSource>
I have bound DetailsView1 to SqlDataSource2. When I run the page, the GridView1 is shown with Persons records OK. Then I click the 'Select' next to a record in the Gridview expecting the corresponding lookup to the master record (Account) to be shown in the DetailsView, but it does not show anything.
What am I doing wrong? Is there a better way of doing this?
Your help is much appreciated. Thank you.
PS. I could find Tutorials showing Master/Details retrieving records in a top down fashion (1:n), but I could not find the reverse (n:1)
I have a friend who has installed MSDE over SQL Server 6.5 - by doing so he broke some other apps that required a SQL 6.5 DB, he realises now it was a mistake on his part and would like to revert to SQL 6.5 again and recover his data, is this possible or has he lost all his old data?
BTW Backups weren't completed....
If anyone can help please let me know.
Two Question
1. Is there a stored procedure, or a way to reverse engineer a database? I have a lot of legacy dbs that I have inherited that I need to create a recovery system for. Part of this is creating the scripts to build all of the tables and I would like to automate it.
2. How can I output the results of a stored procedure to a text file? When I run sp_configure I would like that information to go to a text file.
Thanks in advance
Ken Earley