Kb934459 Has Anyone Applied This Post Sp2 Hotfix??
Aug 28, 2007I'm running sql server 2005 servicepack 2 build 3042 (32bit)
has anyone had any problems with this hotfix????
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934459
ADVERTISEMENT
KB934459 Has Anyone Had Problems With This Hotfix?
Aug 28, 2007I'm running sql server 2005 servicepack 2 build 3042 (32bit)
has anyone had any problems with this hotfix????
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934459
Post SP4 Hotfix
Aug 21, 2007Can anyone help me to get the hotfix SQL Server 2000 build 8.00.2215 ?
As i do not find any download link.
Post Hotfix Error
Nov 13, 2006I am getting the following (MOM) error on 3 of my databases anytime I initiate a backup of the mdf. The database seems to backup as expected. The one thing that has recently changed is I implemented MS Hotfix 2187 on my SQl cluster over the weekend.
Severity: Critical Error
Status: New
Source: MSSQLSERVER
Name: Commit record has already been distributed. Check DBTABLE
Description: Unable to expand message 17055 [-1073724769] 18264 Database backed up: Database: XX03PLUS, creation date(time): 2005/12/06(18:38:50), pages dumped: 23026, first LSN: 18761:44:1, last LSN: 18761:46:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK: {'G: empar03PLUS_fromVCforK1.bak'}).
thanks in advance,
Jerry
Installation Of SQL Server 2005 Post-SP1 Hotfix 918222 (Build 2153) Fails At Copyengine.cpp Line: 689
Feb 5, 2007I believe that I mistakenly attempted to apply the Analysis Services component of this update before applying the SQL Server component. The update now fails continuously with the following message:
02/05/2007 17:58:24.990 ================================================================================
02/05/2007 17:58:25.021 Hotfix package launched
02/05/2007 17:58:27.615 Product discovery successfully completed during the install process for MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 17:58:27.630 SP Level check successfully completed during the install process for MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 17:58:27.646 Product language check successfully completed during the install process for MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 17:58:27.661 Product version check successfully completed during the install process for MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 17:58:27.677 Command-line instance name check completed during the install process
02/05/2007 17:58:27.693 Baseline build check completed during the install process
02/05/2007 17:58:34.864 Attempting to install instance: MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 17:58:34.974 Attempting to install target: CHARLIDEVSRV
02/05/2007 17:58:35.005 Attempting to check for locked files: sqlrun_sql.msp
02/05/2007 17:58:35.052 Attempting to check for locked files: \CHARLIDEVSRVf$44923e05996203228c1608bea1hotfixsqlFilessqlrun_sql.msp
02/05/2007 17:58:35.067 Creating MSP locked file check log at: C:WINDOWSHotfixSQL9LogsSQL9_Hotfix_KB918222_sqlrun_sql.msp.out
02/05/2007 18:01:52.978 MSP returned 1635: This patch package could not be opened. Verify that the patch package exists and is accessible, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid Windows Installer patch package.
02/05/2007 18:01:53.009 Unable to check MSP file: \CHARLIDEVSRVf$44923e05996203228c1608bea1hotfixsqlFilessqlrun_sql.msp
02/05/2007 18:01:53.025 The following exception occurred: Unable to install Windows Installer MSP file Date: 02/05/2007 18:01:53.025 File: depotsqlvaultstablesetupmainl1setupsqlsesqlsedllcopyengine.cpp Line: 689
02/05/2007 18:01:53.212 Failed to install instance: MSSQLSERVER
02/05/2007 18:01:53.259
02/05/2007 18:01:53.259 Product Status Summary:
02/05/2007 18:01:53.290 Product: SQL Server Database Services 2005
02/05/2007 18:01:53.306 MSSQLSERVER - Failure
02/05/2007 18:01:53.321
The update fails although I have cleaned the registry of any reference to it. Another article indicated that the hotfix may delete registry keys required, for instance, to operated SSIS if applied in the wrong order. Here, it appears to be preventing the hotfix from being reapplied. I have ensured that all necessary permissions are available and the services are running in domain user accounts with the necessary rights. I'm the administrator on the machine.
Is there a way to get this hotfix applied without having to completely rip and rebuild my server instance?
Cant Install KB934459 On Sql Express
Dec 12, 2007Hi,
Does anybody knows about this issue?
At first I had the issue described here for sp1 but with this hotfix but the mentioned resolution did not work. I found out that changing back %ProgramFiles% to c:program files allows me to start the installation program, but it crashes later on. In the crash dump I see that the log file to be sent is c:program filesmicrosoft sql server90setup... but my sql install is in d:microsoft sql server...
Thanks,
Charles
Refering To Distinct Values Post(My Other Post)
Oct 22, 2007---------------------------------------------------------------
My Original Post
I have to query n table(NLRImports) using the Distinct keyword, to retrieve a set of ID numbers. ( "Select DISTINCT id_nbr from NLRImport" ).
Now i want to use those values i retrieved, to process the records in the table(NLRImports) 1 by 1. How do i use those ID no's i retrieved as Variables or parameters for my next query?? If this makes sense?
----------------------------------------------------------------
First, thanks for the response.... now here is what im trying to do.
I created a simple application in delphi to import information to a table in MSSql2005. This is some of the resulting columns...
date | id_nbr | account_nbr | sub_account_nbr | ... etc
-------------------------------------------------------------
Now there will be several entries with the same id no but on different dates, so i take it dates would rather be my pkey.
Then i need to take one person's entries(i work on id_nbr) and go thru all the entries taking the earliest date and comparing all the other entries for that person to the first date and select all the dates more than 19 days after the first date and less than 91 days from first date and place it in a new table.
I used cursor s and while loops to kind of get it going but i know that cursors are not really recommended use but the performance implications dont bother with this particular job.
What other ways should i be using to accomplish this?
thanks, i hope this is clear...
DDL Statements Should Be Applied To All 25 Servers
Aug 7, 2002Hi All,
We have a development server and about 25 Production servers. Whenever we did any DDL modification to development, it should be applied to all 25 different servers. I am trying to find a way to apply the changes to these servers from Development server without going to each server and run the script. Is there any way I can automate this action. There is no replication in all these servers. Can you please advise me on how to do this. This is a high priority task i have been assigned and I would appreciate any comments asap.
Thanks in advance.
--Jay
How Do I Tell What Hotfixes Have Been Applied To An Instance?
Aug 31, 2007
How do I tell what hotfixes have been applied to an instance?
Thanks
Subset_filterclause Not Applied At The Subscriber
Nov 6, 2006I am using merge replication between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Express. Some of the articles in my publication have filter conditions. Changes to subscription databases are being applied to the publication database without regard to these filters.
The easiest way to see this problem is to create a merge publication with a single table article with @subset_filterclause of '0 = 1'. Any inserts to the publication database will not be propagated to the subscription database, but inserts to the subscription database will be propagated to the publication database. Can this be right?
Row Count AFTER Filter Has Been Applied.
May 7, 2008
Is there a way to get a count of all the rows (total) after a filter has been applied at the row level?
Ie. Revenue has 11 rows but once the 6 blank ones are filtered count the total number of rows. So it should return 5.
Foreach Variable Cannot Be Applied
Apr 30, 2007I have created a foreach container to capture values from a query and run a script for each line. For some reason though I can't get past the variable mapping.
The SQL Task that is linked to the Foreach container is somthing like this:
SELECT str1, str2, str2, nValue1, nValue2
FROM MyTable
In the SQL Task I've set the following
ResultSet = Full Result Set
Connection Type = OLE DB
Result Name = 0
I've created the following Variables with a Package scope
s1 as String
s2 as String
s3 as String
n1 as Double
n2 as Double
When I run the package I get the following errors
Foreach variable mapping number 4 to variable "User : : n1" cannot be applied
Foreach variable mapping number 5 to variable "User : : n2" cannot be applied
The data type of nValue1 and nValue2 in MyTable are both numeric(19,4)
In setting the variable types in the package it seems that the closest to numeric(19,4) would be double. Is this why it is failing? Is there any way around it? I just need to pass the variables which are numeric and have decimal places.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Bill
Subscriptions Invalid After SP Applied
Aug 29, 2006Hello,
I finished applying SP 1 to sql2k5. Under the replication monitor all of the subscriptions now look like [].databasename when they were originally [subscriber1].databasename. Under Mgmt Studio I see the subscriptions correctly. When I try and replicate I get the message "The subscription to publication 'pub_databasename has expired or does not exist." I have tried to reinitialize the subscriptions but it doesn't work. Is there a way to solve this without have to drop the subscriptions and add them again as I do not want to lose the changes that were made on the subscriptions. We are using merge replication. Thanks.
John
How Is 4GB Max Database Size Applied?
Oct 11, 2006Is the 4GB Database size calculated by totalling up the size of all the databases in an instance OR against each individual DB in an instance (e.g. you can have an unlimited number of DB each up to 4GB in size)?
TIA
Antony
SQL Fails After SP3a Has Been Applied. Slammer?
Jul 23, 2005A Win2k, SQL2k machine with SP2 that only just now has been updated to SP3afails in different ways. Among other things, when I now start EnterpriseManager, I get a message saying "rebbrui.rll" is missing and the snap-infails to initiate. But then the Manager starts anyway.But the SQL application does not work. I searched around the net, and Ifound that it looks as if SQL Slammer has been on the server. I can tell bythe similar symptoms other users have had, allthough I am not sure. Anyway,when I run some online virusscans and the Symantec SQLexp-tool to removeSlammer, I am told that the system is virusfree. Is that because SP3a toSQL2000 automatically got rid of the virus (if any)?But how do I get the SQL to run without any errors again?The server also runs in Terminal Application Mode.Regards, Lars.
View 4 Replies View RelatedRecovery :: Undo Applied Transaction Log?
Oct 21, 2015USE [master]
RESTORE DATABASE [EmployeeRecovered] FROM Â DISK = N'D:BackupsNormalEmployeeFULL.BAK' WITH Â FILE = 1, Â
MOVE N'Employee' TO N'D:MSSQLDATAEmployeeRecovered1.mdf', Â
MOVE N'Employee_log' TO N'D:MSSQLLOGEmployeeRecovered1_log.ldf', Â
NOUNLOAD, Â STATS = 5, NORECOVERY
[Code] ....
Now I realze the recovery point is somewhere in TranBackup2.trn and need to go back to the state where only TranBackup1.trn is applied. How can i do this ?
TFS Transaction Log Backups Failing After SQL/SP2 Applied
May 29, 2007The SQL server transition log backups for the ReportServer and ReportServerTempDB databases have stopped working ever since I applied SQL Server SP2 to my TFS. I know this because I know the date the SQL SP was applied and I see that my transaction logs started to fail immediately after application of the SP. This is noted because the backup logs for SQL server start to contain the failure immediately after SP2 application. The failure is because the databases are now set to the simple recovery model (or they were set to the simple model before application of SP2 and the previous SQL server allowed or properly ignored transaction log backups with the simple database recovery model). Why is this failing since the backup task indicates that databases with simple recovery are automatically excluded? Is the reportserver and reportservertempdb both supposed to be simple recovery? I thought reportserver was usually full recovery.
Here's the contents of TfsTransactionLogBackup_20070308160004.txt before the SP2 application:
Code SnippetMicrosoft(R) Server Maintenance Utility (Unicode) Version 9.0.2047
Report was generated on "TEAMSERVER".
Maintenance Plan: TfsTransactionLogBackup
Duration: 00:00:00
Status: Succeeded.
Details:
Here's the contents of TfsTransactionLogBackup_Subplan_20070308180007.txt immediately after application of SP2:
Code Snippet
NEW COMPONENT OUTPUT
Microsoft(R) Server Maintenance Utility (Unicode) Version 9.0.3042
Report was generated on "TEAMSERVER".
Maintenance Plan: TfsTransactionLogBackup
Duration: 00:00:05
Status: Warning: One or more tasks failed..
Details:
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-03-08T18:00:02.
Task end: 2007-03-08T18:00:02.
Failed:(0) Database 'ReportServer' will not be backed up because it does not have its recovery model set to Full or BulkLogged.
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-03-08T18:00:02.
Task end: 2007-03-08T18:00:02.
Failed:(0) Database 'ReportServerTempDB' will not be backed up because it does not have its recovery model set to Full or BulkLogged.
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-03-08T18:00:03.
Task end: 2007-03-08T18:00:03.
Failed:(-1073548784) Executing the query "BACKUP LOG [ReportServer] TO DISK = N'E:\SQL Server\Database Services\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Backup\ReportServer_backup_200703081800.trn' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N'ReportServer_backup_20070308180002', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
" failed with the following error: "The statement BACKUP LOG is not allowed while the recovery model is SIMPLE. Use BACKUP DATABASE or change the recovery model using ALTER DATABASE.
BACKUP LOG is terminating abnormally.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
Command:BACKUP LOG [ReportServer] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupReportServer_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''ReportServer_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [ReportServerTempDB] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupReportServerTempDB_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''ReportServerTempDB_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsWorkItemTracking] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsWorkItemTracking_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsWorkItemTracking_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsIntegration] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsIntegration_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsIntegration_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsVersionControl] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsVersionControl_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsVersionControl_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsActivityLogging] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsActivityLogging_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsActivityLogging_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsBuild] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsBuild_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsBuild_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [STS_Config_TFS] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupSTS_Config_TFS_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''STS_Config_TFS_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [STS_Content_TFS] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupSTS_Content_TFS_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''STS_Content_TFS_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TFSWarehouse] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTFSWarehouse_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TFSWarehouse_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-03-08T18:00:03.
Task end: 2007-03-08T18:00:03.
Failed:(-1073548784) Executing the query "BACKUP LOG [ReportServerTempDB] TO DISK = N'E:\SQL Server\Database Services\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Backup\ReportServerTempDB_backup_200703081800.trn' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N'ReportServerTempDB_backup_20070308180002', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
" failed with the following error: "The statement BACKUP LOG is not allowed while the recovery model is SIMPLE. Use BACKUP DATABASE or change the recovery model using ALTER DATABASE.
BACKUP LOG is terminating abnormally.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
Command:BACKUP LOG [ReportServer] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupReportServer_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''ReportServer_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [ReportServerTempDB] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupReportServerTempDB_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''ReportServerTempDB_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsWorkItemTracking] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsWorkItemTracking_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsWorkItemTracking_backup_20070308180002'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsIntegration] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsIntegration_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsIntegration_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsVersionControl] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsVersionControl_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsVersionControl_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsWorkItemTrackingAttachments_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsActivityLogging] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsActivityLogging_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsActivityLogging_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TfsBuild] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTfsBuild_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TfsBuild_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [STS_Config_TFS] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupSTS_Config_TFS_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''STS_Config_TFS_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [STS_Content_TFS] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupSTS_Content_TFS_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''STS_Content_TFS_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
GO
BACKUP LOG [TFSWarehouse] TO DISK = N''E:SQL ServerDatabase ServicesMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupTFSWarehouse_backup_200703081800.trn'' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N''TFSWarehouse_backup_20070308180003'', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
And here it is after the KB934458 has been applied:
Code Snippet
NEW COMPONENT OUTPUT
Microsoft(R) Server Maintenance Utility (Unicode) Version 9.0.3054
Report was generated on "TEAMSERVER".
Maintenance Plan: TfsTransactionLogBackup
Duration: 00:00:06
Status: Warning: One or more tasks failed..
Details:
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-05-01T08:00:03.
Task end: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Failed:(0) Database 'ReportServer' will not be backed up because it does not have its recovery model set to Full or BulkLogged.
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-05-01T08:00:03.
Task end: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Failed:(0) Database 'ReportServerTempDB' will not be backed up because it does not have its recovery model set to Full or BulkLogged.
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Task end: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Failed:(-1073548784) Executing the query "BACKUP LOG [ReportServer] TO DISK = N'E:\SQL Server\Database Services\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Backup\ReportServer_backup_200705010800.trn' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N'ReportServer_backup_20070501080004', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
" failed with the following error: "The statement BACKUP LOG is not allowed while the recovery model is SIMPLE. Use BACKUP DATABASE or change the recovery model using ALTER DATABASE.
BACKUP LOG is terminating abnormally.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
Back Up Database (Transaction Log) (TEAMSERVER)
Backup Database on Target server connection
Databases that have a compatibility level of 70 (SQL Server version 7.0) will be skipped.
Databases: All user databases
Type: Transaction Log
Append existing
Task start: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Task end: 2007-05-01T08:00:04.
Failed:(-1073548784) Executing the query "BACKUP LOG [ReportServerTempDB] TO DISK = N'E:\SQL Server\Database Services\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Backup\ReportServerTempDB_backup_200705010800.trn' WITH NOFORMAT, NOINIT, NAME = N'ReportServerTempDB_backup_20070501080004', SKIP, REWIND, NOUNLOAD, STATS = 10
" failed with the following error: "The statement BACKUP LOG is not allowed while the recovery model is SIMPLE. Use BACKUP DATABASE or change the recovery model using ALTER DATABASE.
BACKUP LOG is terminating abnormally.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly
.
Can't Open Encrypted Package After SP1 Applied
Jun 2, 2006I have a problem where after applying SQl Server 2005 SP1 to my workstation, where it presumably updates Visual Studio, I cannot open a package that is password protected and was created before applying SP1. My colleague has not applied SP1 and can still open the package, but I don't even get prompted for the password.
Has anyone else come across this?
Hotfix On Sp2
Mar 14, 2007Hello,
Just want to know if anybody else has problems with the hotfix ?
I have a sqlserver 2005 on my desktop.
I installed the sp2 before 5th march.
Recently Microsoft changed the sp2 and released a hotfix for sp2 installed(downloaded) before 5th march.
I installed the hotfix but it failed to update the sqlserver engine.
Very weird.
I uninstalled sqlserver 2005, applied the new sp2 (which was smaller compared with previous one)
Today i still received a critical update in windows update.
I installed it, but i still don't trust these updates.
How can i investigate all went well ?
Applied Math Problem - Creating A Cut List
Jan 28, 2008I realize this gets into business logic, but a DB based solution might be best. Possibly some pre-calculated measurement tables.
Business problem: Creating a cut list for a window covering (blinds) system. It's preferably a fast calculation I could execute while the user awaits "order confirmation and pricing". A .5 second delay per order would be acceptable.
An order can have unlimited number of line items, but typically between 1 and 20 (number of windows in a single house).
(For this problem) the raw material is man-made, and therefore is always the same length for a particular pattern/color (take 12' for this example; we stock patterns in 9', 12', or 16' but it's always the same for a given pattern/color). I need to tell the cutters how to use the rawmaterial with minimal waste. Note: The saw blade takes 1/16th inch.
For each line item; I have pre-calculated the exact cut size and number of slats. Measurements are in inches at 1/8 (.125) inch increments. The length of raw material length we stock for this pattern is an easy link.
The goal is to average less than 6 inches waste per 12' piece of raw material.
Example order:
5 line items for pattern/color FAUX/white, stocked in 12' lengths.
Line 1: 34 slats at 35.125 inches.
Line 2: 36 slats at 36.875 inches.
Line 3: 50 slats at 42 inches.
Line 4: 55 slats at 70 inches.
Line 5: 52 slats at 30 inches.
The resulting cut-list-workorder would evaluate all lines together and tell them how many 12' slats to pull and how to cut them with minimal material waste.
My question:
I'm left wondering if a database style pre-populated answer list (or some other database based solution) might be a lot faster and simpler than some chess-style complex trial-and-error array based VB algorythm (that I haven't even begun to imagine how to write). If so; how would it look?
In addition; the cutters get something like $10/hr so we can't make it too complex. I'd rather waste a little material and avoid undue confusion, but not much. With $5+ million in this material per year, excess waste can really add up. Imagine the difference between 12% and 15% waste. It's an area worth investing in.
Sorry; I know it's not a simple question. Someone might find it interesting enough to solve, or at least provide hope for a DB solution. At present; I just can't imagine it.
SQL 2012 :: Last Cumulative Update Applied To SSMS
Mar 4, 2014What's the most straight forward to determine what the last cumulative update was that was applied to SSMS?
I know that CU8 is out for SQL Server 2012, I just need to confirm which (if any) update was last applied to SSMS I'm currently looking at.
SQL 2012 :: Get Order In Which Foreign Keys Are Applied
Sep 10, 2015Probably not the best "Subject Title", but no the less what I am looking for is a way to get the order in which I should insert data into a table that has 10 FK's to it. I have queries that list them out for me, but they do that in what seems to be alphabetical order. You can also right click the table in question and select view dependencies, but that as well appears to be in alphabetical order.
Is there any query or any way to see what order I should be inserting and/or deleting data into FK tables?
Report Server Errors After DST Patch Applied
Mar 12, 2007After applying the DST (daylight savings time) fix by METHOD-2 in the following KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/914387
We are receiving the following error for all reports we currently serve:
aspnet_wp!webserver!3c88!03/12/2007-08:44:53:: e ERROR: Internal error: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values.
Parameter name: date
at System.Web.HttpCachePolicy.UtcSetLastModified(DateTime utcDate)
at System.Web.HttpCachePolicy.SetLastModified(DateTime date)
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.ReturnResponseHeaders(HttpClientRequest sessionManager, RSStream result, HttpResponse resp)
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ResponseHeaderData.ReturnResponseHeaders()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.HttpResponseStream.InternalFlush(Boolean finalFlush)
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.HttpResponseStream.Close()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.HttpResponseStreamFactory.CloseAllOpenStreams()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.RenderReport()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.RenderItem(ItemType itemType)
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.RenderItem()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.RenderPageContent()
at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportServiceHttpHandler.RenderPage()
Reporting Services Version: Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Version 8.00.1042.00
SQL Server Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)
We are using the work around specified in the following post to fix this issue:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs/browse_thread/thread/3f2b4854dc79e5e8/1b8261f4cf149078?lnk=st&q=Reporting+Services+dst+error&rnum=2&hl=en#1b8261f4cf149078
Any Help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
ML
Will SQL And Windows Authetication Applied During Setup Has Other Implications?
Mar 28, 2006I choose SQL and windows authetication during SQL Express 2005 install. Will this has any impact on the connection string in my Visual Studio 2005 environment?
View 3 Replies View RelatedBackup Secondary Server After Log Shipping Applied
Feb 13, 2008I have setup Log shipping between two SQL 2005 servers, and everything seems to be working well. The files are transferring and restoring correctly.
My question is whether I need to add any backup procedures for the secondary server to prevent the secondary server's log file size from growing continuously. Should I be doing a transaction log backup on the secondary server? Or will that break the Log chain?
If it makes a difference, the secondary server is in Standby mode after applying the logs.
Any advice would be appreciated,
~ Michelle
Which Hotfix To Apply?
Oct 14, 2007We would like to apply a hotfix to solve the issue that brought our server down. The hotfix we are trying to apply is in Build 3175. But the latest Cumulative Update 3 Package is Build 3186. Should we apply 3175? Or we can go for the latest build 3186? Which is recommended?
View 6 Replies View RelatedSelect All Hotfix.
May 16, 2008Hi,
Is there anyone know where to get the hotfix to put the "Select All" option back on multi-value parameter list after SP1?
The reason why I didn't install SP2 because it requires to install print control on client side. At the moment our company try to avoid it.
Or is there a way to avoid this print control?
I hope to see some responses from MSFT support team.
Cheers,
XL
SP1 Hotfix 919478
Feb 12, 2007I have SP1 on most of my servers. My users however do not. They have been developing using "select all" and are now ready to deploy a major project, I am in the process of installing the hotfix so my question is "they do not have SP1 and I have SP1 along with the hotfix" will that work or does this hot fix require that the client tools have SP1 and the hotfix applied as well"? They do not want to change their development environment since they are so close to deployment of their reports. Thank you!!
View 1 Replies View RelatedNeed HotFix For BUG#124525
Feb 20, 2007Hi Guys,
Iam at the completion of my project and iam facing a crash from the sql server 2005 .....Microsoft have agreed it to be their bug in the following article
http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124525
I have searched for any fix in the site but unable to find that..........So please give me the fix Iam in emergency and also client is on my neck....Please help me out
Thanks in advance,
Phani
Problem With Hotfix
Mar 31, 2008Right now my SQL Server 2005 is on build 3054.I am trying to apply patch SQLServer2005-KB934459-x86-ENU.I am getting error like failed to apply hotfix.
Can you please tell me the exact steps so I can troubleshoot and I can upgrade sql server to build 3159.
SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Articles Not Being Applied To The Subscriber
Jul 21, 2015I have been adding a lot of Articles for Publication.
They make it to the distributer but they do not make it to the subscriber.
If I add articles before the previous batch of articles get applied to the subscriber could that cause a problem and for replication to become out of sync?
It is a pull transactional replication.
I have had to generate a snapshot for the problem to go away but it keeps happening.
Fortunately it is not in production yet.
[URL]
SQL Server 2005, Parameterized Filter: Snapshot Could Not Be Applied
Sep 28, 2005Hi
View 8 Replies View RelatedHow Can I Be Assured That I Do Have SP1 Applied Correctly In SQL 2005 Developer Edition
Feb 9, 2007I installed my SQL 2005 Developer edition and applied the SP1. I didn€™t have a time to wait the installation to complete (I needed to reboot) so I cancelled the SP1 which was downloaded from Windows Update.
Now, my development PC says that SQL 2005 SP1 is applied but I am not sure if it€™s applied correctly. I tried to reinstall SP1 in order to be assured but I can€™t get it reinstalled. I get error message saying that you already have SP1 2047 ENU applied.
I just don€™t want (have a time) to troubleshoot some possible upcoming issues in development because of this. So, how can I be assured that I do have SP1 applied correctly?