Licensing Options
May 29, 2008
Hello all,
Just wanted to get some feedback on this scenario. I will be developing an ASP.net application for our local intranet that employees will have access to. It may also be implmented to allow employees to access this ASP site from home as well. I would be using SQL Server 2000 as the backend DB and wondered what type of licensing would best fit this scenario?
Sorry if this is double posted....seemed to be having some issues with posting.
Thank you!
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 13, 1999
Is it necessary to reinstall SqlSvr 6.5 in order to chance
from 'per server' to 'per seat' licensing ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2007
Is there a way to get Licensing information(product key) off an installed version of SQL Server 2005? Most Microsoft Software has the product key in the about dialog box, but SQL Server doesn't have this anywhere.
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2000
Help me please!!!
I'm going crazy trying to find out the license deal for SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition. It seems that here (in the UK) the Developer edition exists and you can buy it but, Micrisoft (UK) and various resellers etc don't know the licensing deal!!!
Now, i've read a snippet somewhere about the developer edition that for a fixed price of around $499 you get a server license limited to 8 connections and you don't have to buy any CALs! However my reseller thinks that you still have to buy CALs up to maximum of 8? Well, i don't think so!!
Has anyone got this edition and know the deal?
Many thanks...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2001
We are about to deploy an application that uses SQL Server 7.0. Enterprise edition running on a dual processor machine. We expect a maximum concurrent usage of about 500 users, normally about 150/200. Could anyone advise me what the cheapest license arrangement would be, I've had conflicting views from Microsoft and two third party software suppliers? We intend to use the machine in future for other applications but as yet have very little idea of usage.
Joe
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2008
Can any one please clear my confusion. when we install 2000 it always give option ofr licence (processor or per seat) but i installed 2005 couple of times but can' see any option in whole installation about type of licenscing. any one have any idea where and how to choose type of licence for SQL Server 2005.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2006
greetings,
I have several servers running sql enterprise. how do I tell version, licensing model, and client licensing(cal) installed on the server.
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2007
Hi SQL TEAM
I'm in a bit of a situation.
Please bare with me as i explain.
We would like to host a web server
Web Server = Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition running IIS
All the website hosted on this server will be available to the public.
Question 1.How do i licenses Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition?
Question 2.Do i need a CAL for every single person browsing to any of the websites hosted on the above server.
As far as i know you can not get a PER CPU license for Windows 2003 Server, is this true.
Question 3. Where would a CAL be required.
Question 4. How about remote desktop to the above server? that requires a CAL.
Thanks in advance for any replies
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I know that I can have up to 2 GB RAM for the Standard Edition of SQLServer, but if I had two instances, can I have 2 GB per instance, say for 2instances which would equal 4 GB, or is it 2 GB for that installation of SQLServer and all of it's instances?Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2008
Hello
We have a sql server 2005 Enterprise Edition installed on one of our servers where we gor processor license.
The question is can i install a second instance of Sql Server 2000 with out buying any extra licenses or should we buy licenses for this second instance seperately.
Thanks in Advance...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2006
Obviously I'm missing something here (Like a brain??), but from the documentation I'm somewhat confused as to the licensing aspect of the everywhere edition.
Scenario: I have a client (small business for example) and I'm updeating their MS Access application, currently having the front and back ends seperate. May I substitute SQL Everywhere edition in place of the data back-end without further licensing, or will a CAL be required?
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2006
The company I work for has the latest MSDN subscription which has the SQL 2005 Standard edtion, as well as others, and I am trying to figure out what the license is for the SQL. I.E. Processor or what. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
LPATTERSON
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2007
I have a multiple processor server. Can I intall a single processor sql server 2005 on that machine and limit it to one processor only?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2007
Hi,
I need to know if I have to buy an extra license for my subscriber server in the following two scenarios. I have checked similar threads in the forum but could not find an exact answer.
Scenario 1 :
Server A : Publisher - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition.
Server B : Subscriber - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition
Server B has ONLY the replica of one or more DBs of Server A
I have already purchased SQL Server processor license for Server A
Replication Type : Transaction Replication
Scenario 2 :
Server A : Publisher - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition.
Server B : Subscriber - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition
Server B has the replica of one or more DBs of Server A plus one or more operational (mostly reporting) DBs
I have already purchased SQL Server processor license for Server A
Replication Type : Transaction Replication
Thanks
Hamed
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2003
Very often, when I generate SQL scripts for a table, I forget to go to Option tab to click the pk, default, index boxes. Is there a way to permernatly set the whole sql server generate sql scripts options ONCE?
thanks
David
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2006
HiI have created a Sql Script through Enterprise Manager for Drop acolumn. By default its creating lot of 'SET' commands. I doubt allthese SET options are required or not. Pls comment on this issueBEGIN TRANSACTIONSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONSET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLESET ARITHABORT ONSET NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT OFFSET CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL ONSET ANSI_NULLS ONSET ANSI_PADDING ONSET ANSI_WARNINGS ONCOMMITBEGIN TRANSACTIONALTER TABLE EmployeeDROP COLUMN OrderDetails_IDGOCOMMITDil
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2008
Hi ,
I could do with a couple of pointers to the best options to acheive my goal, I'm pretty close with the way I've done it, but I feel there is a more elegant solution out their so your help would be most appreciated.
The problem is finding the best way of moving some SQL Server 2000 changed data into sql server 2005. We are only interested in some tables in 2000 (and sometimes just subsets of those). Because there are quite a few tables and the we want to set up a schedule to run periodically, we chose SSIS. The main reason for this is to utilise a for each loop that pulls each tables name from a one column staging table of table names. (that way we can do more or less comparisons by simply adding and removing from the staging table) Also in this loop, using the table name as a variable, we run an exec sql task along the lines of 'SELECT * from varTable EXCEPT SELECT * from varTable_tracker' which gives us the difference beteween the two tables (where the tracker table is a copy of the data table which is sychronised at the end of the job run). So far so good. Now the tricky bit, EXCEPT only works under 2005, the tables are in 2000 so we ended up having a linked server in 2005 back to the 2000 table. Is there a way of acheiving the same result without involving the linked server - or is there a task (script?) we can run to verify the linked server is up before we excecute the job -we already run checks on Connection Managers to see if they are up but never tried linked servers? Lastly, will performance be an issue
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2006
Hi...First, I am not sure whether I put this post correctly or not. My issue is I developed one simple web application with using ASP.Net 2.0, VB 2005 and SQL express. I wonder that if i install it to my customer's pc, do they need to pay for SQL express's licensing since it is free now.. Thanks in advance.Regards, Anson
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2004
The MSDE licence says that it can be used for up to 5 concurrent users. My app is an ASP.NET app, so won't I just be using one user - the ASP.NET account? I'm wondering whether we can get away with just buying a new server and sticking MSDE on it rather than shelling out for another £5000 SQL server licence...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2004
I expected to find loads of posts regarding licensing but surprising not.
I have SQL Server Developer Edition, which I believe gives me the right to build and distribute applications which use MSDE (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp).
Is there any requirement for the end user to purchase any microsoft product or license?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2005
Quick licensing question...If I am developing an asp.net application using sql server 2005...what is the licensing situation? Do I need just the one CAL for the server with IIS that is hosting the application? or is it one CAL per database connection? One CAL for every person using my application? I'm not sure and I want to make sure that I comply with the licensing for my application. Thanks in advance!Phil
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2001
Hello all,
I did explore the archives on this one, but could'nt find anything that closely matched my issue. I'm running SQL 7.0 Server (Desktop version) on my
laptop and when I try to use DTS to transfer data from a SQL Server 7.0 running on NT Server 4.0 in the SAME NT domain. The error I get says that the
licensing arrangement I have does not permit me to use DTS.
Please help!
Regards
Uday
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2001
In a replication environment:
Does SQL 2000 standard edition support replication if it would be configured as a subscriber.
Is SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition required for a Publisher and Distributor or can you get away with standard edition.
In a web site environment how many CALs are needed when users access the database via webservers and middleware.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2000
Hi there,
I've got 5 user licensing with MS SQL Server 7. I would like to know does the licensing refer to the connection with SQL Server. I've developed an application using VB which have multiple connection (more then 5) with SQL Server. Will there be any problem?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2000
I have a laptop that currently runs Windows 98. I have loaded SQL Server 7.0 Desktop Edition onto this computer. I am getting a DTS licensing error when I attempt to transform data using DTS between remote SQL Servers. The only workaround I have found is to create a DTS package and perform the transformations using transfer manager. This works for me now, but I am wondering how I might go about solving this license problem. It is my belief that a demo version of SQL server 7.0 might have existed on this machine long before I loaded my installation. If this is the case, how can I straighten out the registry to fix my licensing problem?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2002
If SQL Server 2000 is loaded onto a 8 processor machine, can I legitimately
load Standard Edition, which will only use 4 of the 8 processors, or as
some interpretations of the license suggest, must I purchase Enterprise
Edition (i.e. you are not permitted to load SQL Server on a machine which
has more processors than the Product is capable of using) ?.
I know the "reasonable" answer, but what is the legal position ?
Ian
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 1999
I have an SMS 2.0 site set up on one server and SQL 7.0 installed on another server. I have 288 users and have 288 SMS client license and one SMS server license. My question is do I need to have client access licenses for my 288 users for SQL or is the SQL 7.0 licenses included in the SMS package as long as I only use SQL for SMS?
Also does anyone know if SQL 7.0 ask for the number of license that I have during the installation process?
I would appreciate any input anyone may have on this.
Thanks,
Myron
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 1999
I know that PerSeat is each individual computer that accesses SQL Server
and PerServer is the number of concurrent connections to the server.
Is Client Access Licenses the same as PerSeat?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2002
At installation I erred in specifying per seat licensing when the server I'm working on is actually a per processor license. Can I change this or must I reinstall SQL 2K?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2002
At installation I erred in specifying per seat licensing when the server I'm working on is actually a per processor license. Can I change this or must I reinstall SQL 2K?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2001
Can the licencing mode of SQL Server 2000 be changed after it is installed or do we need to reinstall.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2004
I have three heavy duty servers with 32-bit dual P4 CPUs, 4GB RAM, SCSI boot drive, fibrechannel RAID (40+ spindle).
I want to purchase SQL Server licenses for these machines. SQL Server 2000 standard edition seems perfect except it only supports 2GB of RAM and from my understanding, to utiliize the /3GB switch in boot.ini, you need to use Enterprise Edition. You use AWE if you have more than 4GB (which we currently don't).
Is there any way to get standard edition to use a full 3GB?
Anyone know what kind of upgrade path will be provided from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005 licenses?
Will SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition utilize 3-4GB of RAM?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2006
do I require a license to install an outlook client on the DB server if I want to use sql mail, or is it included with sql server?
also is there any benefit to using outlook 2000 over 2003?
thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
